Multi-stage card games have gained some popularity in gambling establishments because the stages add variety, increase opportunities for players to win wagers, and increase opportunities for the gaming establishment to collect bets. Typically during play of a multi-stage card game, bets apply to the outcome of selected stages of the game flow, according to relevant payout schedules customized for each stage.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,389,990 to Mourad entitled, “Method of Playing a Card Game Involving a Dealer” describes a multi-stage card game in which the dealer controls the cards dealt and played at each stage. What is needed is a multi-stage card game in which the player has more freedom and latitude over the elements of chance inherent in card games.
A multi-stage card game includes stages at which each player selects which unrevealed cards are to be played. In one implementation, bets are received for at least some stages of a multi-stage poker-like game. Cards are dealt into an unrevealed dealer hand and an unrevealed player hand for each player. For at least one of the stages, each player selects one of the cards from the player's unrevealed hand to reveal in order to access a progression of payout schedules. Each player's hand accumulates player-selected cards across the stages of the game and across associated payout schedules, until all cards are revealed. A player's poker hand is then compared to the dealer's poker hand for potential payout. Opportunities for bonus bets are also interjected into implementations of the game.
This summary section is not intended to give a full description of Pick-It Poker, or to provide a list of features and elements. A detailed description of example embodiments follows.
This disclosure describes Pick-It Poker games. Pick-It Poker is a moniker given to variations of a betting game that may use real or virtual playing cards. In one implementation, the Pick-It Poker game is a multi-stage poker game in which players select or “pick” which cards in their unrevealed card hands are to be played at certain stages of the game. Different stages may have different payout schemes, various betting options, and various game flow branches. The stages of the game are directed to forming a final poker hand, which under certain conditions determines a payout based on the ante by comparing the player's poker hand to the dealer's poker hand and applying a payout scheme. Other payout schemes are applied to at least some of the stages that precede formation of the final poker hand.
Versions of the Pick-It Poker game may be played manually or on a computing device, such as on an electronic game table that uses real or virtual playing cards and/or real or virtual betting chips. Example game devices and electronic game tables on which the Pick-It Poker game can be played are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,586,766 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,934,998 to Forte et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,165,069, U.S. Pat. No. 7,048,629, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,255,642 to Sines et al., each of these incorporated herein by reference.
Exemplar Implementations of the Pick-It Poker Game
In one implementation, Pick-it Poker is a house-banked five card poker game involving a dealer hand and at least one player hand. In other implementations, the Pick-It Poker game can be played with other size hands, such as two-card, three card, four card, six card, or seven card hands.
At block 102, bets are received for at least some stages of the multi-stage poker game.
At block 104, cards are dealt to create an unrevealed dealer hand and an unrevealed player hand. Multiple players can play, and in some implementations, at some stages of the game, the players play their respective hands against the dealer's hand.
At block 106, for at least one of the stages of the game, a player's selection of a card to reveal from the player's unrevealed hand is received by the dealer, or by a game processor. The dealer or processor reveals the card. In some implementations, the player reveals the player's own selected card.
At block 108, a bet associated with the game stage at which the player's card was revealed is settled. Settlement of the bet may depend on the card meeting a threshold, or the dealer's hand or revealed cards meeting a threshold. If the player's revealed card meets the threshold, then a payout scheme is applied, but if not then the player's bet is collected by the house. In one implementation, if the dealer's hand does not meet a threshold, then the settlement of the bet for that particular game stage may be pushed, i.e., skipped. When settlement of the bet is pushed, then it is as though the bet had not been placed—no money is transferred in either direction.
In one implementation, one or more players place bets 202 for at least some of multiple stages of the game. For each stage 204, 206, . . . , 208 each player picks a card (or cards) from their own unrevealed hand to reveal 206. In each game stage, the bets placed for that stage are settled according to respective payout schemes 210, 212, 214 as applied to the card or cards revealed for that stage, or to the cards revealed cumulatively across the current and preceding game stages.
At block 302, the players place bets for at least some stages of the game, similar to steps 102 and 202 in
At block 314, an equal number of cards are dealt “face down” to the dealer and to each player, as shown in
At block 316, in a five card hand implementation of the method 300, the dealer reveals the first two-cards of the dealer's hand, as shown in
At block 318, after the dealer has revealed, for example, the first two-cards of the dealer's hand, players may choose a further betting option 318 to double the ante 320 based on the dealer's showing cards. The stages of the game are directed to forming a final poker hand that determines the fate of the antes. Thus, at this step (318), each player may judge that the first two-cards of the dealer's hand appear weak, and choose to double the ante bet accordingly 320.
At block 322, each player selects a first card to reveal from the player's hand. The player is free to select any of the cards in the player's hand, because at this point none of the player's cards are yet revealed. In one scenario, all the participating players select a card to reveal from their hands before any of the players' cards are revealed. For example, in an electronic game table implementation, each player designates a first card to reveal and then the dealer actuates a switch or a touch screen icon to reveal all the players' selected cards at once.
At block 324, the card selected by each player is revealed, as shown in the example hand in
At block 326, the first-card-reveal bet 306 is settled according to a first pay scheme. In one implementation, the first-card-reveal pay scheme is a payout based on a threshold. For example, if the revealed card has a denomination of “9” or higher, then the card pays 1:1 of the amount bet in the first-card-reveal bet 306, as shown in the first pay scheme below:
At block 328, each player selects a second card to reveal from the as-yet unrevealed cards in the player's hand. The player is free to select any of the cards remaining unrevealed in the player's hand. In one scenario, all the participating players select a second card to reveal from their hands (e.g., four remaining unrevealed cards) before any of the players' cards are revealed. For example, in an electronic game table implementation, each player designates a second card to reveal and then the dealer actuates a switch or a touch screen icon to reveal all the players' selected cards at once.
At block 330, the second card selected by each player is revealed, as shown in
At block 332, the second-card-reveal bet is settled according to a second pay scheme. Since there are now two playing cards revealed in the player's hand, the payout scheme can be more elaborate than when only one card was revealed. In one implementation, the player's two revealed cards are not compared with the dealer's two revealed cards, but are compared with a payout schedule that applies to the player's two revealed cards themselves. An example second pay scheme is shown below, and is applied to the second-card-reveal bet 308:
At block 334, the remaining cards are revealed, as shown in
At block 340, the ante bet 304 is settled according to the best poker hand held by the dealer or the player. When there are multiple players, some players' poker hands may beat the dealer's poker hand, and some may not. In one implementation, a player's winning poker hand pays 1:1 of the amount of the ante bet 304. In another or the same implementation, the dealer's poker hand must be at least king-high in order for the dealer's hand to qualify for settlement of the ante bet 304. If the dealer's hand is unqualified, then the ante bet 304 is pushed and optional doubled ante bets 304 are also pushed. An example final-hand payout scheme is shown below:
At block 342, the optional doubled ante bet 320 is also settled in the same manner as the regular ante bet 304. That is, if the player's poker hand beats the dealer's poker hand, then the player wins 1:1 on the doubled ante bet, instead of winning 1 to 1 of the regular ante bet 304.
Again, when the dealer's poker hand is not qualified (e.g., is not king-high) then the regular ante bet 302 or the doubled ante bet 320 are pushed (i.e., ignored—as if the ante bet or double ante bet were not placed).
At block 344, the optional final-hand-bonus bet 312, if placed by a player, is settled according to a third pay scheme. In one implementation, settlement of the final-hand-bonus bet 312 typically does not depend on a comparison of the player's hand to the dealer's hand, but instead is based on a third pay scheme, such as the following:
This pay scheme is only one example, many other final-hand bonus bet pay schemes can be used. In most implementations, only the single highest payout amount that a player qualifies to win under the final-hand bonus bet pay scheme is paid to the player. In the player's hand shown in
Although exemplary systems have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed systems, methods, and structures.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2519681 | Mages | Aug 1950 | A |
3049001 | Mackay et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
3070087 | Sittel | Dec 1962 | A |
3181351 | Stauffer | May 1965 | A |
3796433 | Fraley et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
4072310 | Beam | Feb 1978 | A |
4294451 | Wollner | Oct 1981 | A |
4380334 | Minkoff et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4531187 | Uhland | Jul 1985 | A |
4614342 | Takashima | Sep 1986 | A |
4636951 | Harlick | Jan 1987 | A |
4760527 | Sidley | Jul 1988 | A |
4813675 | Greenwood | Mar 1989 | A |
4926327 | Sidley | May 1990 | A |
5022653 | Suttle et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5033744 | Bridgeman et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5046736 | Bridgeman et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5098107 | Boylan et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5141234 | Boylan et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5224706 | Bridgeman et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5242163 | Fulton | Sep 1993 | A |
5255915 | Miller | Oct 1993 | A |
5332219 | Marnell, II et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5377973 | Jones | Jan 1995 | A |
5377993 | Josephs | Jan 1995 | A |
5393057 | Marnell, II | Feb 1995 | A |
5407199 | Gumina | Apr 1995 | A |
5423551 | Stavinsky | Jun 1995 | A |
5496032 | Okada | Mar 1996 | A |
5511781 | Wood et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5531440 | Dabrowski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531448 | Moody | Jul 1996 | A |
5586766 | Forte et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586936 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613912 | Slater | Mar 1997 | A |
5630586 | Lowden | May 1997 | A |
5636843 | Roberts | Jun 1997 | A |
5651548 | French et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655966 | Werdin et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669817 | Tarantino | Sep 1997 | A |
5674128 | Holch et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687968 | Tarantino | Nov 1997 | A |
5735742 | French | Apr 1998 | A |
5743800 | Huard et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766076 | Pease et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770533 | Franchi | Jun 1998 | A |
5779546 | Meissner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788230 | Krise et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5788574 | Ornstein et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803808 | Strisower | Sep 1998 | A |
5831527 | Jones, II et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839960 | Parra et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845907 | Wells | Dec 1998 | A |
5868392 | Kraft | Feb 1999 | A |
5879233 | Stupero | Mar 1999 | A |
5909876 | Brown | Jun 1999 | A |
5919090 | Mothwurf | Jul 1999 | A |
5934672 | Sines et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5934998 | Forte et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944315 | Mostashari | Aug 1999 | A |
5944316 | Hernandez | Aug 1999 | A |
5951397 | Dickinson | Sep 1999 | A |
6010404 | Walker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6093101 | Mourad | Jul 2000 | A |
6099408 | Schneier et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6158741 | Koelling | Dec 2000 | A |
6165069 | Sines et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6186895 | Oliver | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200218 | Lindsay | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203008 | Krise et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203009 | Sines et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217447 | Lofink et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6270404 | Sines et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
6419225 | Sines et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6419226 | Krise et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6481718 | Koelling et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6575467 | Kal | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6619659 | Krise et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641137 | Sines et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651985 | Sines et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6722974 | Sines et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6896259 | Sines et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
RE38982 | Forte et al. | Feb 2006 | E |
7048629 | Sines et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7255642 | Sines et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7389990 | Mourad | Jun 2008 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2117546 | Oct 1983 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100090404 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |