More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 7,969,269. The other reissue application is U.S. application Ser. No. 14/529,939, filed Oct. 31, 2014, which is a reissue divisional of this reissue application. This reissue application is an application for reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 7,969,269, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. Pat. No. 7,969,269 claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to New Zealand Patent Application No. 546955, filed May 2, 2006.
This invention relates to a power pick-up apparatus for use in an Inductive Power Transfer (IPT) system.
In existing Inductive Power Transfer (IPT) applications using a flat pick-up on a floor or roadway, there are two pick-up geometries in common use.
The first arrangement is used with Automated Guided Vehicles (AGV's), and is sensitive to the vertical component of the magnetic flux produced by the currents in the primary conductors (commonly known as the track conductors). Ideally it sits directly above the track conductors, giving the maximum output when the pick-up coil is perfectly aligned between the track conductors. Any misalignment of the pick-up reduces the output from the pick-up coil, which falls to zero at a misalignment of roughly half of the distance between the track conductors.
The second arrangement is sensitive to the horizontal component of the flux produced by the current in the track, and gives the maximum output when the coil is directly over either one of the track conductors. The output falls to zero when the coil is approximately mid-way between the conductors.
When the IPT application is a moving vehicle, neither of these pick-up geometries is ideal as relatively small alignment errors cause the output to fall so that power to the vehicle is lost.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved IPT pick-up apparatus which is less susceptible to alignment errors, or at least to provide the public with a useful choice.
Accordingly in one aspect the invention may broadly be said to consist in Inductive Power Transfer (IPT) pick-up apparatus including:
Preferably the first directional component is a vertical component of magnetic flux and the second directional component is a horizontal component of magnetic flux.
Preferably the first and second coils are wound orthogonally to each other such that one coil is most sensitive to the first directional component of magnetic flux, and the other coil is most sensitive to the second directional component of magnetic flux.
Alternatively the first coil may comprise a first pair of half-coils, and the second coil may comprise a second pair of half-coils.
Preferably the core is constructed with a flat E cross-section.
Preferably the core is constructed from a permeable ferrous material, most preferably ferrite.
Preferably each coil is independently tuned with one or more capacitors.
Preferably the apparatus includes an electrical circuit to independently rectify the current induced in each coil.
Preferably the apparatus includes an electrical circuit to sum and regulate the rectified output from the coils such that the total output power is essentially constant over a wide range of lateral movement of the apparatus relative to the source of magnetic flux.
In a further aspect the invention may broadly be said to consist in inductive power transfer pick-up apparatus including:
Preferably at least one of the part-coils of the first set and at least one of the part-coils of the second set is provided on one of the connection regions and at least one of the part-coils of each set is provided on one or more other connection portions.
Preferably one or more separate tuning capacitors are provided for each coil set.
In a further aspect the invention broadly consists in a IPT system including a pick-up as set forth in any one of the preceding statements of invention and a track having one or more primary conductors, the one or more primary conductors being capable of providing the magnetic flux.
Further aspects of the invention will become apparent form the following description.
A number of embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings in which:
Throughout the description like reference numerals will be used to refer to like features in different embodiments.
Referring first to
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the directional components of magnetic flux will vary dependent on the orientation of the system. For ease of description, the terms vertical and horizontal are used to describe direction in relation to examples in which the primary conductors providing the magnetic flux are laid on or in a floor, and the pick-up is designed to travel over the floor, intercepting magnetic flux generated by the conductors which are energized in the known way.
The apparatus in this embodiment comprises a core 1 having an E-shaped cross-section (preferably constructed of magnetically-permeable ferrite or a material having similar desirable magnetic properties), with three substantially parallel vertical legs and orthogonal connection regions connecting adjacent legs to each other. A core of this geometry may be referred to as a Flat E Core.
The core 1 is provided with a first coil 2 wound around a vertical axis and a second coil 3 wound around a horizontal axis of the core. The pick-up is shown positioned so that the coil is situated between the two track conductors 4 and 5 with current flowing in opposing directions, producing anticlockwise and clockwise magnetic fields, respectively. In this configuration, the current induced in the coil 2 is maximum when the coil is positioned between the two track conductors 4 and 5 (as illustrated), and drops to zero as the coil is moved directly above either of the two conductors. Conversely, the current induced in the coil 3 is maximum when the coil is positioned directly above either of the track conductors 4 or 5, and drops to zero as the coil approaches the midpoint between the two conductors. Therefore, coil 2 is most sensitive to magnetic flux in one direction (a vertical direction as shown in
Series tuning capacitors may also be provided if required for each coil to ensure that the effective short circuit current and open circuit voltage outputs of both the first and second coils can be matched, thereby ensuring a power profile that is as even as possible across the width of a track.
Typically, track conductors for floor mounted AGVs are 100 mm apart and a misalignment of the order of 25 mm will reduce the power to a level so low as to be impractical using existing circuits. However, with a pick-up such as that shown in
The number of conducting tracks may be increased to allow a wider range of motion of the pick-up, for example the use of two track circuits is shown in
The associated power profile for the two pairs of single phase tracks of
The tuning capacitors in
From the foregoing it will be seen that the pick-up apparatus increases the useful range of lateral movement while still achieving useful power outputs with little change or added cost to the electronic control circuitry. In at least one practical-IPT application, these circuits are particularly useful with simple single circuit tracks and typically increase the useful range of lateral movement from 50 mm to 150 mm while still achieving useful power outputs.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description the words “comprise”, “comprising”, and the like, are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense, that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to”.
Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to specific components or integers of the invention having known equivalents, then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth.
Although this invention has been described by way of example and with reference to possible embodiments thereof, it is to be understood that modifications or improvements may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
546955 | May 2006 | NZ | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NZ2007/000097 | 5/2/2007 | WO | 00 | 5/22/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/126321 | 11/8/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3990030 | Chamberlin | Nov 1976 | A |
4665369 | Faller | May 1987 | A |
5293308 | Boys et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5426409 | Johnson | Jun 1995 | A |
5469036 | Eto | Nov 1995 | A |
5524723 | Gramling | Jun 1996 | A |
5528113 | Boys et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5821638 | Boys et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831841 | Nishino | Nov 1998 | A |
6089362 | Takasan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6317338 | Boys | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6456069 | Scarzello et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6483202 | Boys | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489771 | Farque | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499701 | Thornton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6978873 | Ishioka | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7969269 | Boys et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20030062980 | Scheible et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19926799 | Dec 2000 | DE |
329195 | Dec 1998 | NZ |
329195 | Jul 2000 | NZ |
WO-9511545 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO2004105207 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2004105207 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005124962 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2005124962 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-03096361 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/226,956, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/226,956, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/226,956, Notice of Allowance dated May 11, 2011”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/226,956, Response filed Nov. 29, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939 Non-Final Office Action Response, dated Sep. 4, 2011”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2015”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Response filed Sep. 4, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 11, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Response filed May 16, 2016 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2016”, 13 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 07793941.1, Extended European Search Report Mar. 3, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Final Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2015”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2016”, 22 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Preliminary Amendment dated Oct. 31, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Response filed Dec. 31, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Amendment and Response to Final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2016, 10 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2016, 29 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2017, 31 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2017, 16 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Response filed Aug. 3, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2017, 12 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Non Final Office Action dated May 1, 2018, 10 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Response filed Mar. 26, 2018 to Final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2017, 9 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Ex Parte Quayle Action dated Nov. 21, 2018, 9 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 10, 2019, 5 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Response filed Feb. 21, 2019 to Ex Parte Quayle Action dated Nov. 21, 2018, 14 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/529,939, Response filed Nov. 1, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated May 1, 2018, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12226956 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 13930505 | US |