The present invention relates generally to stringed musical instrument pickups and more specifically to improved design of pickup saddles.
Stringed musical instruments, such as guitars, violins, basses (guitar and upright), etc., typically include a set of strings that are struck or manipulated in some way and thereby produce sound as they vibrate. In some instruments the strings run over a saddle which provides an endpoint. Saddles can be provided for individual strings or for multiple strings. An electromechanical transducer can be placed underneath a saddle as a pickup to generate a signal from the vibrational energy of the contacting string. Many conventional pickup saddles follow a design such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,218,159 to McClish (the McClish patent). A pickup saddle such as one in the McClish patent is illustrated in
Pickup saddles for stringed instruments utilizing interference fit in accordance with embodiments of the invention are disclosed. In several embodiments, a pickup saddle for a stringed instrument includes a U-shaped top cap having two legs, each leg including a receiving portion configured to mate with a mating portion of a base, a base fitted to the interior of the top cap, where two surfaces of the base include a mating portion matching with and affixed to a receiving portion of the top cap, a piezoelectric transducer placed between the top cap and the base and electrically connected to the base, a positive wire connected to the piezoelectric transducer, and a ground wire connected to the base.
The pickup saddle of claim 1, wherein the receiving portion of each leg of the top cap includes a receiving cavity for an interference fit and where each mating portion of the base includes a protrusion for an interference fit formed to fit a corresponding receiving cavity on the top cap.
In additional embodiments, the interference fits are dovetail joints.
In further embodiments, the dovetail joint is tapered toward the top of the pickup saddle.
In several additional embodiments, the pickup saddle also includes a tune-o-matic bridge and at least one other pickup saddle within the tune-o-matic bridge.
In several further embodiments, the bottom surface of the base is convex shaped front-to-back.
In some more embodiments, the pickup saddle also includes at least one additional top cap attached to the base and a piezoelectric transducer under each additional top cap.
In yet additional embodiments, the ground wire is connected to the base by solder.
In further additional embodiments, the piezoelectric transducer is affixed to the underside of the top cap and connected to a positive wire facing downward from the piezoelectric transducer.
In yet more embodiments, the positive wire passes through a hole in the base and exits the underside of the base.
In the course of exploring aspects of embodiments of the invention, it was found that there are at least two primary modes of failure in traditional pickups such as the types disclosed in the McClish patent. First, the positive wire often will detach from the positive electrode of the piezo or the piezo will separate from the string contact. Second, the top cap that holds the piezo to the base often can shear or break loose from the crimps or other retaining mechanisms attempting to hold it in place relative to the piezo and the base due to repeated vibration and/or age weakening the material. Additionally, these types of pickups often exhibit large differences in string-to-string balance because of preload or distortion of the embedded transducer. There can be 6-9 dB difference in signal between sets of binned pickups and/or 3-4 dB of difference between pickups in a set. Some of this is due to the sensitivity of piezo pickups, but also a mechanical preload such as the force of the top cap being crimped to the body will further alter efficiency. A primary cause of many of these issues is the way these types of pickups are assembled. In a typical configuration, the base has two tabs or other retaining mechanisms that wrap around and over the top of the top cap. The tabs are crimped or bent into place to hold down the top cap. Not only does this often impart a preload onto the piezo, it can allow for movement of the top cap and/or separation of the top cap from the base if the crimp fails.
Pickups in accordance with embodiments of the invention can alleviate some of the negative aspects of traditional pickup saddles mentioned above. First, securing the top cap and the base together with a mechanism such as using an interference fit can reduce the mechanical preload on the transducer that can cause large differences in sensitivity as well as the likelihood of the two parts separating from one another. With an interference fit, friction along mating surfaces hold the base to the top cap securely and with minimal potential movement of the two pieces in relation to one another and minimal forces pressing them together. Second, the interference fit is a more reliable mechanical connection which can reduce strain on wires exiting the transducer, thereby reducing the likelihood of breakage. Some other embodiments secure the top cap and the base together with mechanisms (e.g., adhesive, weld, solder, etc.) other than an interference fit that also does not impart a preload to the transducer. Many embodiments include a piezoelectric transducer or other type of electromechanical transducer that provides an electrical signal representative of audio, although one skilled in the art will recognize that other types of transducers may be utilized as appropriate to a particular application.
Construction
In several embodiments, the outer shape and profile of the assembled pickup saddle is similar to a traditional saddle as a generally rectangular prism, although other shapes are possible. A pickup saddle in accordance with many embodiments of the invention includes at least a top cap, a base, and a transducer pickup sensor. A top cap portion of a pickup saddle in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in a side view in
In several embodiments of the invention, the top surface 12 of the top cap 10 has a string resting surface configured for a string to rest on it, for example with a notch or groove. The groove can have a width that matches the string gauge. A piezoelectric transducer 14 can be placed on the underside of a top cap, for example, within a shallow recess or pocket 16. In many embodiments, the piezoelectric transducer 14 can be affixed in any of a variety of ways, including but not limited to, soldering or conductive epoxy. In some embodiments, the positive terminal of the piezoelectric transducer faces down away from the top of the top cap. In several embodiments, the transducer may fit at least partially within a shallow recess 16 that can help it to stay in place.
In many embodiments, the top cap 10 is U-shaped with mating surfaces on the inner sides of the two “legs” 18, 20 of the “U” to match mating surfaces a base that can be introduced into the inner space of the “U.” In several embodiments, the mating surfaces include female mating features 22, 24 that provide an interference fit by forming receiving portions into which protruding male mating features on a base can fit. In various embodiments, the female and male portions can be switched from top cap to base as may be appropriate. In further embodiments, the mating surfaces utilize other fastening mechanisms that place little or no preload onto the transducer enclosed within the pickup saddle, such as adhesive, weld, solder, etc.
In additional embodiments, the top cap can have multiple U's such that it forms a “W” or a comb shape. In such embodiments, a base can be inserted into each U cavity and a string may pass over the top of the top cap at the area opposing each U cavity.
In several embodiments, the inference fit or other fastening mechanism is designed to hold the base in place within the “U” using friction without distorting either the U or base parts or the piezoelectric transducer. In this way, minimal or zero preload is applied to the piezoelectric transducer. As mentioned further above, preload on a piezoelectric transducer can cause high variation in output levels between transducers because the amount of preload is difficult to predict and/or control. Furthermore, the interference fit is a better mechanical connection which can decrease the likelihood of the transducer detaching from the top cap or wires to break due to tension and/or movement.
In some embodiments, the interference fit is provided by a dovetail joint at each of the mating surfaces. In other embodiments, the interference fit is provided by a dowel and rail joint or a T joint. In additional embodiments, the thickness and/or taper of the beam (i.e., male portion of joint) and/or flutes can be tuned to control the resonant frequency. In several embodiments, the joint shape forming the interference fit is slightly tapered toward the top.
The interference fit can also allow the top of the top cap to remain flexible without requiring a crimp to keep the top cap and base together. Any loading on the top would be minimal and consistent.
The interference fit can also provide a strong ground connection and strain relief by reducing degrees of freedom in movement of the top cap relative to the base.
A base portion of a pickup saddle in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in a side view in
The base in the illustrated embodiment includes an electrical ground connection for the embedded transducer, which can be, for example, a soldered connection of the ground braid of a coaxial cable (e.g., an outer braid layer in many typical coaxial cables).
In several embodiments, a ground braid of a coaxial cable is pre-soldered to base. When the base is assembled together with the top cap, the inner wire of the coaxial cable is positioned to mate with the piezoelectric transducer as the base is inserted into the “U” area of the top cap. For example, the inner wire can be started with 45 degree bend in the wire and pushing the base into the top cap causes the wire to further bend into place and contact the transducer in the top cap. Epoxy (conductive or not) on the positive lead of the transducer can be positioned to capture the inner wire of coaxial cable.
The improvements discussed herein provide for reliability and consistency and ease of assembly.
Another pickup saddle in accordance with several embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
Yet another pickup saddle in accordance with some embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
In order to properly function as a pickup, at least the portions of the surfaces of the top cap and base surrounding the piezoelectric transducer (if not the entire surfaces) should be electrically conductive. In many embodiments, the top cap and base are at least partially formed of electrically conductive material. The resting surface for the string can be of another material, conductive or non-conductive. Although specific configurations of a pickup saddles are described above with respect to
The structures and principles discussed above can be implemented in any of a number of styles of pickup saddles for stringed instruments. Additional styles of pickup saddles often sense vibration and output electrical signals in the same manner, but may be placed in slightly different locations or be mounted or fastened in a different way to the instrument.
Tune-o-Matic Bridge
Pickups in accordance with embodiments of the invention can be implemented in a style of bridge and saddle system referred to as tune-o-matic bridges. Tune-o-matic bridges are most often, but not exclusively, used on electric guitars. They usually do not incorporate pickups and the pickups are mounted to another part of the guitar body under the strings, although pickups can be built into the saddles as will be discussed below.
In additional embodiments of the invention, pickup saddle utilizing interference fit may be utilized in a tune-o-matic type bridge. One embodiment is illustrated in
The construction of a saddle insert 700 is illustrated in
The intonation adjustment screw 606 acts as an opposing force to the string tension pulling the saddle toward the head of the guitar. As the intonation adjustment screw is moved in or out, the corresponding saddle insert can rock forward or backward slightly due to looseness in the threads of the screw. If the bottom surface of the saddle insert is flat, the portion of the surface in contact with the bridge can shift from the front edge (toward the head of the guitar) to the rear edge (toward the bottom of the guitar). This alternating from one contact edge to the other can shift the intonation drastically.
In several embodiments of the invention, the bottom surface 802 of the saddle insert(s) 804 is slightly curved (or convex) front to back as illustrated in
Although specific configurations of a tune-o-matic pickup bridges are described above with respect to
Cartridge Pickup
In additional embodiments of the invention, multiple top caps, such as that illustrated in
RMC Pickup
In further embodiments of the invention, an RMC style pickup may utilize interference fit per the principles discussed further above. As opposed to the other configurations discussed above, a traditional RMC style pickup has prongs on the base that reach over and capture the ends of the top cap, as in the McClish patent. The prongs in a traditional RMC style pickup are typically crimped and over time can fail as previously discussed.
An RMC style pickup in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should not be limited to the specific embodiments illustrated.
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Patent Application No. 62/821,346, filed Mar. 20, 2019, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2324024 | Ream | Jul 1943 | A |
2420864 | Constantin | May 1947 | A |
2456995 | Robinson | Dec 1948 | A |
2769867 | Crownover et al. | Nov 1956 | A |
3070775 | Andrews, Jr. | Dec 1962 | A |
3291887 | Carman et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3325580 | Barcus et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3538232 | Bachtig et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3600497 | Zanessi | Aug 1971 | A |
3712951 | Rickard | Jan 1973 | A |
3725561 | Paul | Apr 1973 | A |
3792204 | Murayama et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3858480 | Schneider et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
4135426 | Rickard | Jan 1979 | A |
4147084 | Underwood | Apr 1979 | A |
4160401 | Tomioka | Jul 1979 | A |
4189969 | Katayama | Feb 1980 | A |
4230013 | Wellings | Oct 1980 | A |
4278000 | Saito et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4290331 | Izdebski | Sep 1981 | A |
4314495 | Baggs | Feb 1982 | A |
4356754 | Fishman | Nov 1982 | A |
4491051 | Barcus | Jan 1985 | A |
4501186 | Ikuma | Feb 1985 | A |
4514247 | Zola | Apr 1985 | A |
4580480 | Turner | Apr 1986 | A |
4581974 | Fender | Apr 1986 | A |
4581975 | Fender | Apr 1986 | A |
4633121 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634917 | Dvorsky et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4657114 | Shaw | Apr 1987 | A |
4688460 | McCoy | Aug 1987 | A |
4727634 | Fishman | Mar 1988 | A |
4774867 | Fishman | Oct 1988 | A |
4785704 | Fishman | Nov 1988 | A |
4815353 | Christian | Mar 1989 | A |
4944209 | Fishman | Jul 1990 | A |
4975616 | Park | Dec 1990 | A |
5012086 | Barnard | Apr 1991 | A |
5027691 | Kennedy | Jul 1991 | A |
5029375 | Fishman | Jul 1991 | A |
5155285 | Fishman | Oct 1992 | A |
5168117 | Anderson | Dec 1992 | A |
5189771 | Fishman | Mar 1993 | A |
5218159 | McClish | Jun 1993 | A |
5319153 | Fishman | Jun 1994 | A |
5322969 | Aaroe | Jun 1994 | A |
5410101 | Sakurai | Apr 1995 | A |
5455381 | Juszkiewicz | Oct 1995 | A |
5463185 | Fishman | Oct 1995 | A |
5539147 | Hoshino | Jul 1996 | A |
5670733 | Fishman | Sep 1997 | A |
5817966 | Fishman | Oct 1998 | A |
6023019 | Baggs | Feb 2000 | A |
6078006 | Raisanen | Jun 2000 | A |
6336367 | Raisanen | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6605771 | Baggs | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6822156 | Lazarus et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7135638 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7157640 | Baggs | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7943838 | Dunwoodie | May 2011 | B2 |
8969702 | Takabayashi | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9796065 | Urban | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10636403 | Clark | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10991353 | Baker | Apr 2021 | B1 |
20040134328 | Yeakel | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040159224 | Raisanen | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040255763 | Baggs | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050109197 | Garrett et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20100307324 | Takabayashi | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120103171 | Lashbrook | May 2012 | A1 |
20130019736 | Finkle | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20190348017 | Clark | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200302904 | Baggs | Sep 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3100326 | Nov 1984 | DE |
3402463 | Jun 1985 | DE |
3536921 | Apr 1987 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200302904 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62821346 | Mar 2019 | US |