A portion of the material in this patent document is subject to copyright protection under the copyright laws of the United States and of other countries. The owner of the copyright rights has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the United States Patent and Trademark Office publicly available file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. The copyright owner does not hereby waive any of its rights to have this patent document maintained in secrecy, including without limitation its rights pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.14.
The present disclosure is related to to micromachined ultrasonic transducers (MUTs) and more particularly to the design of piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (PMUT) devices and associated electronic circuitry used to transmit and receive ultrasound signals.
The following is a tabulation of some art that appears relevant to the present disclosure:
Piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers (PMUTs) are ultrasonic transducers used to transmit and receive ultrasound. The optimal design of a PMUT includes electrical, mechanical, and manufacturing considerations. Considering electrical design, there is a need to design an appropriate electrode structure that reduces the PMUTs sensitivity to noise arising from electromagnetic interference and allows the PMUT to generate a large acoustic output signal. Considering mechanical design, a PMUT transmits and receives ultrasound in a frequency band centered at its flexural resonance frequency. Variations in the resonance frequency due to residual stress, packaging stress, and thermal stress should be minimized. Considering manufacturing, it is desirable to minimize the number of electrical connections to the PMUT in order to reduce manufacturing cost and package size, particularly when arrays of PMUTs are to be fabricated on a common substrate.
US Patent Application 20100117485 (Martin et al.) and U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,579,753 and 7,538,477 (Fazzio et al.) disclose various electrode designs for piezoelectric transducers. The common concept behind these designs is illustrated in
In an alternative embodiment described by Martin et al, the two piezoelectric transducers 101 and 102 are located on a single flexural membrane, as shown in top view in
Finally, Martin et al. focus exclusively on the electrical performance of the transducer as a receiver (e.g. a microphone). Because a PMUT is used both to receive and transmit ultrasound, an electrode and circuit design is needed to address the performance of the PMUT as both a transmitter and a receiver.
It is within this context that aspects of the present disclosure arise.
The invention will be more fully understood by reference to the following drawings which are for illustrative purposes only:
Although the description herein contains many details, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. Therefore, it will be appreciated that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art.
This application discloses a piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (PMUT) device and associated circuitry used to transmit and receive ultrasound signals. It will be appreciated that the following embodiments are provided by way of example only, and that numerous variations and modifications are possible. For example, while circular embodiments are shown, the PMUT may have many different shapes such as square, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal, and so on. Furthermore, while PMUTs are shown having a unimorph construction, consisting of a single piezoelectric layer on a passive layer, bimorph and multimorph PMUTs having multiple piezoelectric layers and various electrode patterns are possible. All such variations that would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure. It will also be appreciated that the drawings are not necessarily to scale, with emphasis being instead on the distinguishing features of the PMUT device disclosed herein.
PMUTs are resonant devices wherein ultrasound is transmitted and received in a frequency band centered at the PMUTs flexural resonance frequency. For manufacturability, it is desirable for a PMUT design to have a resonant frequency that is insensitive to fabrication variations, such as residual stress. In prior art, such as the transducer design shown in
The preferred new ring PMUT also shows better operational frequency bandwidth, when compared with the prior art PMUT. The bandwidth Δω0 is a function of the membrane damping b and mass m: Δω0∂b/m. The damping b is the same for both designs, since it is a function of the membrane area. However the mass m is lower for the new ring pMUT, since the piezoelectric material is removed in the center of the membrane. The ring PMUT will then have higher bandwidth, inversely proportional to its reduced mass.
All cited references are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In addition to any other claims, the applicant(s)/inventor(s) claim each and every embodiment of the invention described herein, as well as any aspect, component, or element of any embodiment described herein, and any combination of aspects, components or elements of any embodiment described herein.
The appended claims are not to be interpreted as including means-plus-function limitations, unless such a limitation is explicitly recited in a given claim using the phrase “means for.” Any element in a claim that does not explicitly state “means for” performing a specified function, is not to be interpreted as a “means” or “step” clause as specified in 35 USC § 112, ¶6. In particular, the use of “step of” in the claims herein is not intended to invoke the provisions of 35 USC § 112, ¶6.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2895062 | Abbott | Jul 1959 | A |
4276491 | Daniel | Jun 1981 | A |
5101133 | Schafer | Mar 1992 | A |
5298828 | Radovanovich | Mar 1994 | A |
6379510 | Kane | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6661285 | Pompei | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673016 | Bolorforosh et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20060004290 | Smith | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070106159 | Iwama | May 2007 | A1 |
20100041093 | Hering | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100150381 | Lee | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100246332 | Huang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100327702 | Martin | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110285244 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20170021391 | Guedes et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170128983 | Horsley et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170194934 | Shelton et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180287503 | Despesse | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2017095396 | Jun 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/053606 dated Feb. 10, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/625,421, filed Jun. 16, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62058941 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2015/053606 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15466040 | US |