Patent Grant
7156188
This invention relates to pile drivers and, more particularly, to pile drivers with control systems.
Pile drivers are used in the construction industry to drive piles, also known as posts, into the ground. Piles are used to support massive structures such as bridges, towers, dams and skyscrapers. Piles, or posts, may be made of timber, steel, concrete or composites. To drive a pile into the ground requires high impact energy to overcome the soil resistance. However, the impact energy must not be so large as to damage the post during installation.
Impact stresses are directly related to the impact energy delivered to the pile. During impact, the energy transferred to the pile is a function of force, F(t), and velocity, v(t), both of which vary in time. The impact energy as a function of time, E(t), is calculated as follows:
E(t)=∫F(t)v(t)dt
The impact energy may be approximated to be the kinetic energy of the hammer just before it impacts the pile head, i.e. E=½mv2. However, not all of this kinetic energy is transferred to the pile because of the inelasticity of the collision, which results in deformation and energy dissipation in the form of heat and sound.
There are a variety of pile-driving machines currently known in the industry. There are simple drop-hammer pile drivers that use a cable, winch and crane to raise a mass above the pile and simply let the hammer free-fall onto the top of the pile (also known as the pile head), as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,660,655 (Wilner). Sometimes the drop hammer has a vertical guide or rail to ensure greater accuracy during the drop. These guided drop hammers are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,749 (Likins, Jr. et al.) and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,301,551 (Piscalko et al.). Pile drivers may also be hydraulically actuated as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,485 (Pomonik et al.) or pneumatically driven as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,508,181 (Jenne). There are also diesel-powered pile drivers (which are also known as free piston internal combustion pile drivers). The diesel pile driver uses the piston as the impacting hammer. This type of pile driver is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,727,639 (Jeter).
One of the main recurrent problems in pile driving is controlling the impact of the hammer on the pile. If the impact energy is too little, the pile does not penetrate the soil and time and energy is lost. If the impact energy is too great, the pile may be damaged or broken. Indeed, concrete piles are susceptible to cracking if the impact stresses are too large.
Traditionally, foundation engineers have relied on static or dynamic analyses, probe piles and static testing to ensure a safe and efficient installation. However, the dynamic formulae are intrinsically inaccurate because the dynamic modeling of the hammer, driving system, pile and soil is based on simplifications and assumptions that do not always simulate reality. Even if dynamic models were further refined, they would still not be able to account for the fact that soil conditions may vary with depth or may change due to repetitive impacting. Recent attention has been paid to the question of measuring the impact energy transferred from the hammer to the pile. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,749, Likins Jr. discloses a system for recording data from sensors. The impact energy for the subsequent impact is then manually adjusted, for example, by varying the drop height of the drop-hammer pile driver or by throttling the diesel pile driver to vary the ram stroke. Likewise, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,301,551 (Piscalko et al.), a pile driver analyzer (PDA) collects data from sensors located on the pile itself. However, certain drawbacks are evident from the prior art design. The manual control of the impact energy is both time-consuming and inaccurate. Accordingly, an improved means of controlling the impact energy of the hammer in a pile driver is needed.
It is thus the object of the present invention to provide an improved control system for a pile driver.
As embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention provides a pile-driving apparatus comprising a hammer for driving a pile (or other foundation element) into the ground; a velocity sensor for measuring the velocity of the hammer; and a control system for controlling the velocity of the hammer based on the velocity measured by said velocity sensor.
After measuring the impact velocity, the control system will compute the impact energy and then compare this with the desired impact energy for the given soil conditions and pile type. The control system will automatically adjust the impact energy for the subsequent hammer stroke based on the readings from the velocity sensor. This automated, velocity-feedback pile driver thus drives piles more efficiently, adjusting itself to the soil conditions and pile type without the need for constant manual readjustment. The impact energy delivered to the pile is thus more optimal than in prior art pile drivers.
Preferably, the pile-driving apparatus further comprises a strain gauge and an accelerometer located on the pile for measuring the strain and acceleration, respectively, of the pile during impact. The strain gauge and accelerometer provide signals to the control system, for determining if a maximum allowable impact energy has been exceeded in which case the control system reduces the velocity of the hammer for the subsequent impact.
The presence of an optional pile driving analyzer uses strain and acceleration data to determine whether the stress imposed on the pile exceeds the maximum allowable stress given the dimensions and Young's modulus of the pile. If the stress is too high, the control system will intervene to reduce the hammer stroke to avoid breaking or damaging the pile. Damage to a pile is, of course, costly and time-consuming, especially when the pile is nearly fully installed. Alternatively, the control system will stop the hammer altogether so that a pile cushion may be installed atop the pile head. Overstressing of piles is thus averted. For example, the U.S. Federal Highway Administration specifies that the stresses in a pile must not exceed a certain limit. The PDA readings thus help to ensure compliance with design requirements and building codes.
Examples of embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
In the drawings, preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of examples. It is to be expressly understood that the description and drawings are only for the purpose of illustration and are an aid for understanding. They are not intended to be a definition of the limits of the invention.
Referring to
Located on the hammer 12 is a velocity sensor 20 that is capable of measuring the velocity of the hammer 12 just before it impacts the pile 14. The velocity sensor 20 is preferably comprised of two magnetic proximity switches (not shown). The pair of magnetic proximity switches is located on the side of the hammer 12. The proximity switches are set to close approximately 1 inch above impact. The time elapsed between the closing of the magnetic proximity switches is transduced into a velocity reading. Alternatively, the velocity sensor 20 could be radar, such as a Doppler radar, which uses the phase shift of the return signal to compute the velocity of the hammer 12.
The velocity sensor 20 sends a signal 22 to an energy display and user input unit 24. The energy display and user input 24 may be a personal computer with a keyboard and monitor. A user would input a target impact energy into the user input 24 based on soil conditions and the type of pile to be driven. The energy display and user unit 24 interfaces with control logic 26. The control logic 26 controls a hydraulic control system 28, which derives its hydraulic power from a hydraulic reservoir 30. The hydraulic control system 28 regulates the hydraulic pressure in a hydraulic control line 32. The hydraulic control line 32 is connected to a fuel system throttle 34, which opens and closes in response to variations in hydraulic pressure in the hydraulic control line 32. The opening and closing of the fuel system throttle 34 regulates the stroke output of the diesel pile driver, thereby causing the hammer 12 to move faster or slower. The control logic 26 thus regulates the fuel system throttle 34 and hence the velocity of the hammer 12 based on the signal 22 from the velocity sensor 20. Therefore, the pile driver 10 can be said to incorporate a velocity-feedback control system to ensure that the correct impact energy is imparted to the pile 14.
In operation, the velocity sensor 20 measures the velocity of the hammer 12 and sends a signal 22 to the control logic 26 via the energy display and user input 24. The control logic 26 computes the actual impact energy based on the velocity reading and compares the actual impact energy with the target impact energy set by the user. If the actual impact energy exceeds the target impact energy, then the control logic intervenes by reducing the velocity of the hammer for the subsequent hammer stroke. To reduce the velocity of the subsequent hammer stroke, the control logic sends a signal to the hydraulic control system 28 which in turn adjusts the pressure in the hydraulic control line 32. The variation in pressure in the hydraulic control line 32 will cause the fuel system throttle 34 to open or close. This will cause the diesel pile driver to increase or decrease its hammer stroke, thereby augmenting or diminishing the impact energy of the subsequent hammer stroke.
Further refinements to the embodiment shown in
The functioning of the hydraulic control system 28 is also depicted in
The system may be used to drive any elements into the ground, including piles, posts, and any deep foundation elements.
The above description of preferred embodiments should not be interpreted in a limiting manner since other variations, modifications and refinements are possible within the spirit and scope of the present invention. The scope of the invention is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/469,415, filed on 12th May, 2003, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2804856 | Spurlin | Sep 1957 | A |
| 3747693 | Kummel et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 4096916 | Hennecke et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4365306 | House et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4508181 | Jenne | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4586366 | Milberger | May 1986 | A |
| 4660655 | Wilner | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4860835 | Mauch | Aug 1989 | A |
| 5090485 | Pomonik et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5303162 | Yoon | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5548397 | Kool et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5581013 | Frederick | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5610818 | Ackroyd et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5727639 | Jeter | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5978749 | Likins, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6301551 | Piscalko et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6533502 | McVay et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050023014 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60469415 | May 2003 | US |
