Pile driving in water produces extremely high sound levels in the surrounding environment in air and underwater. For example, underwater sound levels as high as 220 dB re 1 μPa are not uncommon ten meters away from a steel pile as it is driven into the sediment with an impact hammer.
Reported impacts on wildlife around a construction site include fish mortality associated with barotrauma, hearing impacts in both fish and marine mammals, and bird habitat disturbance. Pile driving in water is therefore a highly regulated construction process and can only be undertaken at certain time periods during the year. The regulations are now strict enough that they can severely delay or prevent major construction projects.
There is thus significant interest in reducing underwater noise from pile driving either by attenuating the radiated noise or by decreasing noise radiation from the pile. As a first step in this process, it is necessary to understand the dynamics of the pile and the coupling with the water as the pile is driven into sediment. The process is a highly transient one, in that every strike of the pile driving hammer on the pile causes the propagation of deformation waves down the pile. To gain an understanding of the sound generating mechanism, the present inventors have conducted a detailed transient wave propagation analysis of a submerged pile using finite element techniques. The conclusions drawn from the simulation are largely verified by a comparison with measured data obtained during a full scale pile driving test carried out by the University of Washington, the Washington State Dept. of Transportation, and Washington State Ferries at the Vashon Island ferry terminal in November 2009.
Prior art efforts to mitigate the propagation of dangerous sound pressure levels in water from pile driving have included the installation of sound abatement structures in the water surrounding the piles. For example, in Underwater Sound Levels Associated With Pile Driving During the Anacortes Ferry Terminal Dolphin Replacement Project, Tim Sexton, Underwater Noise Technical Report, Apr. 9, 2007 (“Sexton”), a test of sound abatement using bubble curtains to surround the pile during installation is discussed. A bubble curtain is a system that produced bubbles in a deliberate arrangement in water. For example, a hoop-shaped perforated tube may be provided on the seabed surrounding the pile, and provided with a pressurized air source, to release air bubbles near or at the sediment surface to produce a rising sheet of bubbles that act as a barrier in the water. Although significant sound level reductions were achieved, the pile driving operation still produced high sound levels.
Another method for mitigating noise levels from pile driving is described in a master's thesis by D. Zhou entitled Investigation of the Performance of a Method to Reduce Pile Driving Generated Underwater Noise (University of Washington, 2009). Zhou describes and models a noise mitigation apparatus dubbed Temporary Noise Attenuation Pile (TNAP) wherein a steel pipe is placed about a pile before driving the pile into place. The TNAP is hollow-walled and extends from the seabed to above the water surface. In a particular apparatus disclosed in Zhou, the TNAP pipe is placed about a pile having a 36-inch outside diameter (O.D.). The TNAP pipe has an inner wall with a 48-inch O.D., and an outer wall with a 54-inch O.D. A 2-inch annular air gap separates the inner wall from the outer wall.
Although the TNAP did reduce the sound levels transmitted through the water, not all criteria for noise reduction were achieved.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A pile configured to produce lower noise levels during installation includes a driving shoe, and an elongate tube that is configured to have an low effective Poisson's ratio such that the amplitude of longitudinal radial expansion waves resulting from hammering or driving the pile into the ground are substantially prevented from being transmitted into the ground. The tube may have a circular or a non-circular cross section.
A pile configured for noise abasement includes a driving shoe and a tube or rod with a distal end that engages the driving shoe and a proximal end that is configured to be driven with a pile driver. The tube incorporates geometric features, for example, longitudinal slots, and/or longitudinal grooves on the inner and/or outer surface of the tube, that attenuate the radial amplitude of traveling compression waves by providing space for circumferential expansion. The longitudinal features may be aligned with the axis of the tube, and may be provided intermittently. In an embodiment, the intermittent slots or grooves are offset. In another particular embodiment, grooves are provided on both the inner and outer surfaces of the tube.
In an embodiment, the pile further comprises a second tube disposed radially outwardly from the first tube, with a gap therebetween. The first tube is configured to be driven, for example, by extending upwardly beyond the second tube. The tubes may be circular and concentric, and the gap may define an annular tubular space. In an embodiment, the annular tubular space is partially or substantially filled with a compressible filler, for example, a polymeric foam. The filler may have linear or non-linear deformation characteristics. In an embodiment, the second tube is fixed to the drive shoe and configured to be pulled into the ground by the drive shoe, which is driven into the ground through the first tube.
In an embodiment, the first tube is removably attached to the drive shoe and is configured to be removed after driving in the pile, such that the first tube functions as a mandrel.
In an embodiment, the drive shoe extends radially outwardly from the first tube, and if present, the second tube, thereby reducing the coupling between the ground and the tube. In an embodiment, the drive shoe defines a radially outward ledge, and the pile further comprises an annular plenum with a plurality of apertures and connected to a high pressure air source, wherein the plenum is disposed on the ledge that is thereby driven into the ground with the drive shoe. The plenum is configured to generate bubbles during the driving process, further decoupling the tube from the ground.
A method for driving piles into the ground includes providing a pile, for example, a pile as described above, configured to attenuate the radial amplitude of traveling compression waves, positioning the pile at a desired position, and driving the pile with a pile driver.
In an embodiment, the pile is configured with geometric features that encourage circumferential expansion in the elongate tube, for example, a plurality of longitudinal slots or grooves, which may be intermittent and offset.
In an embodiment, the pile further is formed in a double-shell configuration, defining an annular space between first and second tubes. The annular space may be partially filled with an elastic material, for example, a polymeric foam. In an embodiment, the inner tube is removed after driving in the pile.
In an embodiment, the drive shoe extends radially outward from the tube(s) defining a ledge. A bubble generator may be disposed on the ledge to generate a bubble curtain adjacent the pile while driving the pile.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
To investigate the acoustic radiation due to a pile strike, an axisymmetric finite element model of a 30-inch (0.762 m) radius, 32 m long hollow steel pile with a wall thickness of one inch submerged in 12.5 m of water was created and modeled as driven 14 m into the sediment. The radius of the water and sediment domain was 10 m. Perfectly matched boundary conditions were used to prevent reflections from the boundaries that truncate the water and sediment domains. The pile was fluid loaded via interaction between the water/sediment. All domains were meshed using quadratic Lagrange elements.
The pile was impacted with a pile hammer with a mass of 6,200 kg that was raised to a height of 2.9 m above the top of the pile. The velocity at impact was 7.5 m/s, and the impact pressure as a function of time after impact was examined using finite element analysis and approximated as:
P(t)=2.7*108 exp(−t/0.004)Pa (1)
The acoustic medium was modeled as a fluid using measured water sound speed at the test site, cw, and estimated sediment sound speed, cs, of 1485 m/s and 1625 m/s, respectively. The sediment speed was estimated using coring data metrics obtained at the site, which is characterized by fine sand, and applied to empirical equations.
The present inventors conducted experiments to measure underwater noise from pile driving at the Washington State Ferries terminal at Vashon Island, Wash., during a regular construction project. The piles were approximately 32 m long and were set in 10.5 to 12.5 m of water, depending on tidal range. The underwater sound was monitored using a vertical line array consisting of nine hydrophones with vertical spacing of 0.7 m, and the lowest hydrophone placed 2 m from the bottom. The array was set such that the distance from the piles ranged from 8 to 12 m.
Pressure time series recorded by two hydrophones located about 8 m from the pile showed the following key features:
1. The first and highest amplitude arrival is a negative pressure wave of the order 10-100 kPa;
2. The main pulse duration is ˜20 ms over which there are fluctuations of 10 dB; during the next 40 ms the level is reduced by 20 dB; and
3. There are clearly observable time lags between measurements made at different heights off the bottom. These time lags can be associated with the vertical arrival angle.
The finite element analysis shows that the generation of underwater noise during pile driving is due to a radial expansion wave that propagates along the pile after impact. This structural wave produces a Mach cone in the water and the sediment. An upward moving Mach cone produced in the sediment after the first reflection of the structural wave results in a wave front that is transmitted into the water. The repeated reflections of the structural wave cause upward and downward moving Mach cones in the water. The corresponding acoustic field consists of wave fronts with alternating positive and negative angles. Good agreement was obtained between a finite element wave propagation model and measurements taken during full scale pile driving in terms of angle of arrival. Furthermore, this angle appears insensitive to range for the 8 to 12 m ranges measured, which is consistent with the wave front being akin to a plane wave.
The primary source of underwater sound originating from pile driving is associated with compression of the pile. Refer to
Note that this is the angle formed between the vertically oriented pile 90 and the wave front associated with the Mach cone; it is measured with a vertical line array, and here it will be manifested as a vertical arrival angle with reference to horizontal. This angle only depends on the two wave speeds and is independent of the distance from the pile. As illustrated in
As the wave in the pile reaches the pile 90 terminal end, it is reflected upwards (
Based on finite element analyses performed to model the transient wave behavior generated from impacts generated when driving a pile 90, the generation of underwater noise during pile 90 driving is believed to be due to a radial expansion wave that propagates along the pile after impact. This structural wave produces a Mach cone in the water and the sediment. An upwardly moving Mach cone produced in the sediment after the first reflection of the structural wave results in a wave front that is transmitted into the water. Repeated reflections of the structural wave causes upward and downward moving Mach cones in the water.
It is believed that prior art noise attenuation devices, such as bubble curtains and the TNAP discussed above, have limited effectiveness in attenuating sound levels transmitted into the water because these prior art devices do not address sound transmission through the sediment. As illustrated most clearly in
The important aspect of the sound generation mechanism described above is that a significant source of the sound is transmitted from the sediment to the water. Therefore, it is not possible to significantly attenuate the noise by simply surrounding the portion of the pile that extends above the sediment. For effective sound reduction, it is necessary to attenuate the upward traveling Mach cone that emanates from the sediment.
I. Double Shell Piles
A family of novel noise-attenuating piles are disclosed below wherein an inner tube or rod extends through a generally concentric outer tube that is attached to a driving shoe at the distal end of the pile. The inner tube is hammered to drive the pile into the sediment, and the outer tube is configured to not be hammered. For example, the upper end of the inner tube may extend above the upper end of the outer tube. The outer tube is thereby pulled into the ground by the shoe. The inner tube, which is hammered and therefore conducts the compression waves discussed above, is largely isolated from the water and sediment by the outer tube, and therefore the radial expansion wave caused by the hammering is largely shielded from the environment. The inner tube or rod essentially operates as a mandrel extending through the outer tube to the shoe.
The noise-attenuating pile 100 includes a structural outer tube 102, a generally concentric inner tube 104, and a tapered driving shoe 106. In a current embodiment, the outer tube 102 is sized and configured to accommodate the particular structural application for the pile 100, e.g., to correspond to a conventional pile. In one exemplary embodiment, the outer tube 102 is a steel pipe approximately 89 feet long and having an outside diameter of 36 inches and a one-inch thick wall. Of course, other dimensions and/or materials may be used and are contemplated by the present invention. The optimal size, material, and shape of the outer tube 102 will depend on the particular application. For example, hollow concrete piles are known in the art, and piles having non-circular, cross-sectional shapes are known. As discussed in more detail below, the outer tube 102 is not impacted by the driving hammer 90, and is pulled into the sediment 92 rather than being driven directly into the sediment. This aspect of the noise-attenuating pile 100 may facilitate the use of non-steel structural materials for the outer tube 102, such as reinforced concrete, fiber reinforced composite materials, carbon-fiber reinforced polymers, etc.
The inner tube 104 is generally concentric with the outer tube 102 and is sized to provide an annular space 103 between the outer tube 102 and the inner tube 104. The inner tube 104 may be formed from a material similar to the outer tube 102, for example, steel, or may be made of another material, such as concrete. It is also contemplated that the inner tube 104 may be formed as a solid elongate rod rather than being tubular. In a particular embodiment, the inner tube 104 comprises a steel pipe having an outside diameter of 24 inches and a ⅜-inch wall thickness, and the annular space 103 is about six inches thick.
In a particular embodiment, the outer tube 102 and the inner tube 104 are both formed of steel. The outer tube 102 is the primary structural element for the pile 100, and therefore the outer tube 102 may be thicker than the inner tube 104. The inner tube 104 is structurally designed to transmit the impact loads from the driving hammer 98 to the driving shoe 106.
The driving shoe 106 in this embodiment is a tapered annular member having a center aperture 114. The driving shoe 106 includes a frustoconical distal portion, with a wedge-shaped cross section tapering to a distal end defining a circular edge, to facilitate driving the pile 100 into the sediment 92. In a current embodiment, the driving shoe 106 is steel. The outer tube 102 and inner tube 104 are fixed to the proximal end of the driving shoe 106, for example, by welding 118 or the like. Other attachment mechanisms may alternatively be used; for example, the driving shoe 106 may be provided with a tubular post portion that extends into the inner tube 104 to provide a friction fit. The maximum outside diameter of the driving shoe 106 is approximately equal to the outside diameter of the outer tube 102, and the center aperture 114 is preferably slightly smaller than the diameter of the axial channel 110 defined by the inner tube 104. It will be appreciated that the center aperture 114 permits sediment to enter into the inner tube 104 when the pile 100 is driven into the sediment 92. The slightly smaller diameter of the driving shoe center aperture 114 will facilitate sediment entering the inner tube 104 by reducing wall friction effects within the inner tube 104.
It will be appreciated from
At or near the upper end of the pile 100, a compliant member 116, for example, an epoxy or elastomeric annular sleeve, may optionally be provided in the annular space 103 between the inner tube 104 and the outer tube 102. The compliant member 116 helps to maintain alignment between the tubes 102, 104, and may also provide an upper seal to the annular space 103. Although it is currently contemplated that the annular space 103 will be substantially air-filled, it is contemplated that a filler material may be provided in the annular space 103, for example, a spray-in foam or the like. The filler material may be desirable to prevent significant water from accumulating in the annular space 103, and/or may facilitate dampening the compression waves that travel through the inner tube 104 during installation of the pile 100.
The advantages of the construction of the pile 100 can now be appreciated with reference to the preceding analysis. As the inner tube 104 is impacted by the driver 98, a deformation wave propagates down the length of the inner tube 104 and is reflected when it reaches the driving shoe 106, to propagate back up the inner tube 104, as discussed above. The outer tube 102 portion of the pile 100 substantially isolates both the surrounding water 94 and the surrounding sediment 92 from the traveling Mach wave, thereby mitigating sound propagation into the environment. The outer tube 102, which in this embodiment is the primary structural member for the pile 100, is therefore pulled into the sediment by the driving shoe 106, rather than being driven into the sediment through driving hammer impacts on its upper end.
A second embodiment of a noise-attenuating pile 200 in accordance with the present invention is shown in cross-sectional view in
It is contemplated that in an alternate similar embodiment, an outer tube may be formed of concrete, and an inner tube or solid member may be formed from steel or a similarly suitable material.
In the embodiment of
Although a flange and recess connection is shown in
Although the piles are shown in a vertical orientation, it will be apparent to persons of skill in the art, and is contemplated by the present invention, that the piles may alternatively be driven into sediment at an angle.
II. Low Effective Poisson'S Ratio Piles
A conventional steel pile typically includes a metal tube that is fixed to a driving shoe, and driven or hammered into the ground. As discussed above and illustrated in
When a conventional material is compressed, it tends to expand in the directions perpendicular to the direction of compression. This is called the Poisson effect, and Poisson's ratio quantifies the tendency of the material to expand. The Poisson effect has a physical interpretation: A cylindrical rod of isotropic elastic material will respond to an axial compression force by decreasing in length and increasing in radius. Poisson's ratio is defined, in the limit of a small compressive force, as the ratio of the relative change in radius to the relative change in length. Poisson's ratio of steel, for example, is typically about 0.26-0.31. Certain non-isotropic composite materials and metamaterials are known that have a Poisson's ratio that is near zero or even negative. A material having a negative Poisson's ratio is referred to as an auxetic material. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,320, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Typically steel has a Poisson's ratio between about 0.27 and 0.3, and concrete has a Poisson's ratio of about 0.2. As used herein, “low-Poisson's ratio” is defined to be a Poisson's ratio less than 0.1. It is also possible to substantially reduce the radial amplitude caused by the compression (or tension) wave by reducing the effective Poisson's ratio of the pile. As used herein, a pile having an effective Poisson's ratio of zero is defined to mean a pile that does not expand radially in response to the axial compressions applied by the pile driver. Such a pile would substantially mitigate coupling the compression waves generated by the hammer with the surrounding sediment and water.
A pile 300 with a low effective Poisson's ratio in accordance with another aspect of the present invention, and which attenuates radial compression waves, is illustrated in
A cross-sectional view of the pile 300 through section 8-8 is shown in
Although the slots 303 are illustrated as vertically aligned and with neighboring columns vertically offset, this particular arrangement is not intended to be restrictive, and other suitable configurations will be apparent to persons of skill in the art. For example, it is contemplated that the slots 303 may not be arranged in vertically aligned columns, and a less regular arrangement may be preferable. It may be preferred to circumferentially offset each row of slots 303 by a small amount to further disrupt the ability for the radial component of the compression wave to travel vertically along the length of the tube 302. It is also contemplated that the slots 303 may alternatively be arranged at an angle and/or with some curvature.
Another novel aspect of the pile 310 is the enlarged-diameter driving shoe 316, which extends radially beyond the diameter of the outer tube 314. It will be appreciated that when a conventional pile is driven into the sediment, it becomes increasingly difficult to drive the pile due to forces exerted by the sediment 92 on the pile. In particular, as the pile is driven into the sediment 92, the sediment bed behaves in part elastically, and sediment 92 is urged or pressed inwardly by elastic forces in the media, applying a clamping-like force to the pile. The deeper the conventional pile is driven in, the greater the frictional forces exerted by the sediment 92 on the pile.
The pile 310 shown in
In this embodiment, the inner tube 312 further includes an upper flange 324 that extends radially outwardly without engaging the outer tube 314, and the outer tube 314 includes a lower flange 325 that extends radially inwardly without engaging the inner tube 312. A filler material or sleeve 329 is disposed between the upper flange 324 and the lower flange 325. The sleeve 329 may be formed from a material having variable or non-liner stiffness properties. In this embodiment, the sleeve 329 and flanges 324, 325 may permit a design amount of compression of the inner tube 312 with relatively lower axial coupling with the outer tube 314. As the sleeve 329 compresses further the axial coupling between the tubes 312, 314 will increase.
It is contemplated that in some embodiments the inner tube 312 or the outer tube 314, or portions thereof, may be removable during any point of the installation process.
Another embodiment of a pile 320 in accordance with the present invention is shown in
In the pile 320, the bubbles 93 are generated from the plenum 328 near or adjacent the outer perimeter of the pile tube 322 and attached to the driving shoe 326. Therefore, the bubbles 93 are generated from below the sediment floor 92 and extend further into the sediment 92 as the pile 320 is driven in. The bubble plenum 328 receives high pressure air from a source (not shown). The bubbles 93 therefore provide some noise abatement, and importantly aid in reducing the friction between the pile tube 322 and the sediment 92. By reducing the friction, the bubbles 93 also advantageously reduce the shear waves transmitted into the sediment 92, which is particularly important when pile driving on land close to buildings.
In exemplary embodiments, the slots 303, 303′, 303″ have a length in the range of three to twenty-four inches, and a width in the range of one-sixteenth to one-half inch. The circumferential or angular spacing of the slots may be in the range of a few degrees to sixty degrees. In a particular embodiment, the slots 303 are about eighteen inches long and one-eighth inch wide. The tube 302 is one-inch thick steel with a circumference of 36 inches, and slots 303 are provided every five degrees. In another exemplary embodiment, the slots 303 are only provided along a portion of the length of the tube 302, for example, along the upper or lower half of the tube 302. Although slots or grooves are currently preferred for attenuating the radial amplitude of the compression waves, it is contemplated that other means for allowing and encouraging circumferential expansion may be used. For example, elongate features similar to the slots or grooves described above may be accomplished by heat treating longitudinal sections of the tube, such that relatively “soft” elongate features permit circumferential expansion. Similarly, non-homogeneous material properties may be achieved by forming the tube with different materials, for example, including elongate longitudinal portions comprising a softer or more compressible material.
Other mechanisms for reducing the effective Poisson's ratio, i.e., reduce the radial expansion in the pile, are contemplated. For example, the pile may be wound by a tension cable on the outside.
While illustrative embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/063430 | 11/2/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/067438 | 5/10/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
790910 | McClintock | May 1905 | A |
2972871 | Foley, Jr. | Jan 1957 | A |
3261412 | Lob | Jul 1966 | A |
3779025 | Godley et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4808037 | Wade | Feb 1989 | A |
4817734 | Kuehn | Apr 1989 | A |
5282701 | An | Feb 1994 | A |
5320453 | Bullivant | Jun 1994 | A |
5494378 | Hanson | Feb 1996 | A |
6042304 | Manning | Mar 2000 | A |
6047505 | Willow | Apr 2000 | A |
6123485 | Mirmiran et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6264403 | Hall et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6354766 | Fox | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6409433 | Hubbell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6568881 | Long | May 2003 | B2 |
7037045 | Jones | May 2006 | B2 |
7226247 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7338233 | Barrett et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7517174 | Wolynski et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8622658 | Reinhall et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020159843 | Hubbell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030082012 | Clark | May 2003 | A1 |
20090110488 | Pearson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20130011203 | Reinhall et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140086693 | Reinhall et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
62-170612 | Jul 1987 | JP |
07-286324 | Oct 1995 | JP |
08-260499 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-0543727 | Jan 2006 | KR |
10-0657176 | Dec 2006 | KR |
10-0841735 | Jun 2008 | KR |
2004053237 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2011-091041 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 3, 2011, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2011/021723, filed Jan. 19, 2011, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140056650 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61555336 | Nov 2011 | US |