This application is the U.S. National Phase of PCT Application No. PCT/DE2020/100180 filed on Mar. 12, 2020, which claims priority to DE 10 2019 106 498.8 filed on Mar. 14, 2019, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
This disclosure relates to a pilot-controlled valve which controls the flow of coolant through an engine block of an internal combustion engine.
Such a coolant valve is known from an unpublished application having the file number DE 10 2017 122 271.5. When the control opening is closed, the permanent connection between the stagnation pressure chamber and the in-flow causes the closing piston to pause in the closed position, i.e. in sealing contact with the valve seat, only due to the pressure of the coolant. The closing movement of the closing piston from the open to the closed valve position is generated by the difference in static pressures which act on the respective axial end side of the closing piston on the part of the stagnation pressure chamber and—to a lesser extent due to the flow—on the part of the through-flow chamber.
The amount of this pressure difference decreases as the volumetric flow over the through-flow chamber decreases to the extent that the hydrodynamically constrained compressive forces acting on the closing piston within the working range of smaller volumetric flows are no longer sufficient to close the coolant valve or close it sufficiently fast enough. This is particularly true in the case in which the closing piston is loaded in the opening direction with the force of a return spring.
Further pilot-controlled valves are known from US 2017/0284277, EP 2 778 364 B1, DE 11 2013 004 902 T5, and DE 10 2004 014 068 A1.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,152,088 A discloses a cooling system of an internal combustion engine.
The object of the present disclosure is to improve a pilot-controlled coolant valve of the aforementioned type in terms of design such that the coolant valve closes sufficiently quickly enough even when there are small volumetric flows and accordingly small differential pressures at the closing piston.
The object is achieved by means of the features described herein. Accordingly, the coolant valve can comprise the following:
Consequently, the coolant valve according to the disclosure differs from the coolant valve mentioned at the outset in that the plunger not only stroke-actuates the control piston but also the closing piston. The equally mechanical actuation of the closing piston by the actuator supplements the pressure difference at the closing piston which is insufficient for closing the valve or the closing rate thereof with small volumetric flows and is enabled in that the closing piston closes the control opening, except for a radial sealing gap between the outer casing surface of the control piston and the inner casing surface of the control opening, and simultaneously or subsequently stroke-actuates the closing piston in the direction of the valve seat.
The mechanical actuation of the closing piston can take place, as a function of the balance of forces and pressures acting on the closing piston:
Further features of the disclosure result from the following description and the figures, in which an exemplary embodiment of a coolant valve according to the disclosure is shown partially schematically. In the figures:
The coolant valve 1 shown in
The pilot control takes place by means of an actuator 11, which is an electrically actuated solenoid and comprises a plunger 12 moving in the pressure release chamber 8, which plunger stroke-actuates a control piston 13 in the direction of the control opening 9 and the in-flow 2. The control piston 13 is formed as a single piece with the plunger 12 and impacted with a spring force of a control spring 14, which spring force is directed opposite the solenoid.
A closing piston 15, arranged coaxially relative to the plunger 12 and the control piston 13, moves in the pressure chamber 7. Axial end side 16 of the closing piston 15 delimits a stagnation pressure chamber 18 on one side, into which the control opening 9 feeds. Axial end side 17 of the closing piston 15 delimits a through-flow chamber 19 on the other side, into which the in-flow 2 feeds. The closing piston 15 is guided in the pressure chamber 7 via a sealing gap between the outer casing surface 20 of the closing piston 15 and the inner casing surface 21 of the pressure chamber 7. A pressure channel 22 passing through the closing piston 15 permanently (or continuously fluidly) connects the stagnation pressure chamber 18 to the in-flow 2, the feed-in of which in the through-flow chamber 19 is delimited by a valve seat 23. The cross-sectional surface delimited by the valve seat 23 is less than the cross-sectional surface of the pressure chamber 7.
In the closed state of the coolant valve 1, the closing piston 15 sealingly rests on the valve seat 23, and interrupts the connection between the through-flow chamber 19 and the in-flow 2. A piston spring 24 impacts the closing piston 15 in the opening direction thereof with a spring force directed away from the in-flow 2.
The function of the coolant valve 1 is explained by means of
In the exemplary embodiment shown, the control opening 9 is being closed by the control piston 13, while the position of the closing piston 15 resting on the separating wall 26 remains unchanged as compared to
When the control opening 9 is closed, the difference in static pressures hydrodynamically constrained by the coolant flow over the through-flow chamber 19 means that end side 16 of the (still) open closing piston 15 delimiting the stagnation pressure chamber 18 is impacted with a higher pressure than end side 17 delimiting the through-flow chamber 19, and consequently the closing piston 15 is impacted with compressive force in the closing direction as related to the valve seat 23. If the coolant flow is insufficient, however, this pressure difference can become too small to extend the closing piston 15 opposite the spring force of the piston spring 24 (not shown in the section), the frictional forces, and also the stagnation pressure forces from the flowing coolant and to move it into sealing contact with the valve seat 23.
In the event that the compressive force in the stagnation pressure chamber 18 alone suffices for keeping the closing piston 15 in its closed position, the electromagnetic actuation force acting on the closing piston 15 can be removed by retracting the control piston 13 into a position in which the control opening 9 is closed as before.
The closing piston 15, impacted by the spring force of the piston spring 24 (not shown in the section) and by the coolant pressure in the in-flow 2, moves back into its open position according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 106 498.8 | Mar 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2020/100180 | 3/12/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/182257 | 9/17/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
338771 | Soden | Mar 1886 | A |
3818927 | Zeuner | Jun 1974 | A |
5803556 | Weis | Sep 1998 | A |
6152088 | Occella et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152420 | Hohl | Nov 2000 | A |
7028713 | Koyama | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20140264101 | Perotto | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160169407 | Aguilar et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170284277 | Wardle et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101270825 | Sep 2008 | CN |
108713118 | Oct 2018 | CN |
102004014068 | Oct 2004 | DE |
112013004902 | Jun 2015 | DE |
102017122271 | Mar 2019 | DE |
2778364 | Oct 2015 | EP |
3273124 | Jan 2018 | EP |
2853795 | Dec 2018 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220163981 A1 | May 2022 | US |