The present invention relates to analog to digital conversion.
To meet the ever-present demand for increased speed and accuracy in analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), techniques such as time-interleaving have become increasingly popular. Referring to
Gain mismatch in sub-ADCs 91 and timing offsets in the clock signals 94 used to trigger time-interleaved conversion operations can limit the performance of a time-interleaved ADC, even if the slower sub-ADCs are of sufficient accuracy. Thus, techniques for eliminating or minimizing such gain mismatches and timing offsets can be critical.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Self-calibrating analog-to-digital conversion devices and systems are disclosed herein in various embodiments. In one embodiment, a predetermined-frequency sine wave, referred to herein as a pilot tone, is added to a signal of interest as a calibration reference. The resulting composite signal is input to a time-interleaved ADC having multiple component ADCs (or sub-ADCs) that are triggered by a phase-staggered set of timing signals to generate respective digital samples of the input signal. Each of the digital samples is transformed to a frequency-domain representation in a fast-Fourier transform (FFT) operation performed on the output of each component ADC so that, for N component ADCs, as many as N FFT operations are performed. The transforms or FFTs that result from the FFT operations are supplied to correction logic which evaluates the relative amplitudes and phases of spectral components of the portion of the transforms that correspond to the pilot tone (i.e., the pilot transforms). Because the amplitudes of the pilot transforms should match one another (i.e., because the FFT operations are performed on time-offset samples of the same pilot sinusoid), any differences between the pilot transform amplitudes are deemed to result from gain mismatch in the component ADCs and thus may be used to adjust the gains of the component ADCs as necessary to establish equal or substantially equal gains. Similarly, because the phases of the pilot transforms should be equally offset from one another within a cycle time of the timing signals (e.g., the timing signals oscillate at the same frequency in one embodiment and therefore share the same cycle time, but have different phase offsets within the cycle time), pilot transforms exhibiting phase offsets that deviate from their expected phase angles are deemed to result from phase error in one or more of the timing signals. Accordingly, such phase deviations may be used to adjust the phase of the timing signals as necessary to correct the phase errors and thus establish a desired distribution of phase offsets in the pilot transforms.
In one embodiment, a summing circuit 111 (which may be a simple wired summation) is provided to generate the input signal 102 by summing a signal of interest 104 with one or more sinusoidal signals of predetermined frequency, referred to herein as pilot tones or pilot signals 106. The pilot signals 106 may be generated either externally or by circuitry disposed on the same integrated circuit die (or within the same integrated circuit package) as the time-interleaved ADC 100 and, at least in one embodiment, are harmonically related to the sampling clock frequency.
The outputs of the component ADCs 1011-101N are supplied to a fast-Fourier transform (FFT) engine, illustrated in
In one embodiment, the FFT engine 103 and correction logic 105 is implemented at least in part by a programmed processor which may be, for example and without limitation, a digital signal processor (DSP) or general purpose processor. In alternative embodiments, the FFT engine and/or correction logic or any portion thereof may be implemented by a state machine or hardwired circuitry, including circuitry specifically designed to carry out the phase and gain correction operations described herein.
Numerous changes may be made to the gain correction approach of
Turning to the clock phase correction operation of
The clock phase correction operation described in reference to
PhaseError(i)=|ph(PTT(i)−(ExpectedPhase(i)−ph(PT(1))|, where
ExpectedPhase(i)=(i−1)*2π/N.
Also, the threshold comparison at decision block 179 may be omitted so that, instead of the deadband effect provided by the threshold comparison, a phase correction is performed in each iteration of the phase correction operation. Further, in alternative embodiments, the phase of a given timing signal may be adjusted by incrementing or decrementing a phase correction value by a predetermined or programmed stepsize. Also, instead of adjusting the phase angles of the sampling clock signals, a sampling delay within the component ADCs themselves may be increased or decreased. More generally, any technique for adjusting the phase of the sampling times within the component ADCs based on the relative phase angles of the pilot transforms may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Alternative clock generating circuits may be used to implement the clock generator 107 of
It should be noted that the pilot tones and their associated transforms can be used to support self-calibration within a time-interleaved ADC in a number of ways. For example, in applications where injecting a pilot tone might corrupt the signal, the pilot tone can be turned on to support self-calibration when the ADC is powered up, and then shut down or otherwise disabled from reaching the ADC input after the self-calibration is completed. Alternatively, in applications where continuous presence of the pilot tone can be tolerated, the pilot can be continuously supplied in the input signal, allowing the ADC to continuously self-calibrate and thus apply gain and timing signal corrections as necessary to avoid drift (e.g., as may result from changes in voltage and temperature). Such continuous self-calibration operation is particularly well-suited to frequency-division systems such as OFDM (orthogonal frequency division multiplexing), cellular, radio and television. Furthermore, the self-calibration techniques described above may be applied in combination with other calibration schemes, such as the use of background pseudo-noise calibration signals and static capacitor ratio calibrations.
It should be noted that the various circuits disclosed herein may be described using computer aided design tools and expressed (or represented), as data and/or instructions embodied in various computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, transistor, layout geometries, and/or other characteristics. Formats of files and other objects in which such circuit expressions may be implemented include, but are not limited to, formats supporting behavioral languages such as C, Verilog, and HLDL, formats supporting register level description languages like RTL, and formats supporting geometry description languages such as GDSII, GDSIII, GDSIV, CIF, MEBES and any other suitable formats and languages. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media) and carrier waves that may be used to transfer such formatted data and/or instructions through wireless, optical, or wired signaling media or any combination thereof. Examples of transfers of such formatted data and/or instructions by carrier waves include, but are not limited to, transfers (uploads, downloads, e-mail, etc.) over the Internet and/or other computer networks via one or more data transfer protocols (e.g., HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.).
When received within a computer system via one or more computer-readable media, such data and/or instruction-based expressions of the above described circuits may be processed by a processing entity (e.g., one or more processors) within the computer system in conjunction with execution of one or more other computer programs including, without limitation, net-list generation programs, place and route programs and the like, to generate a representation or image of a physical manifestation of such circuits. Such representation or image may thereafter be used in device fabrication, for example, by enabling generation of one or more masks that are used to form various components of the circuits in a device fabrication process.
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention. For example, the interconnection between circuit elements or circuit blocks may be shown or described as multi-conductor or single conductor signal lines. Each of the multi-conductor signal lines may alternatively be single-conductor signal lines, and each of the single-conductor signal lines may alternatively be multi-conductor signal lines. Signals and signaling paths shown or described as being single-ended may also be differential, and vice-versa. Similarly, signals described or depicted as having active-high or active-low logic levels may have opposite logic levels in alternative embodiments. With respect to terminology, a signal is said to be “asserted” when the signal is driven to a low or high logic state (or charged to a high logic state or discharged to a low logic state) to indicate a particular condition. Conversely, a signal is said to be “deasserted” to indicate that the signal is driven (or charged or discharged) to a state other than the asserted state (including a high or low logic state, or the floating state that may occur when the signal driving circuit is transitioned to a high impedance condition, such as an open drain or open collector condition). A signal driving circuit is said to “output” a signal to a signal receiving circuit when the signal driving circuit asserts (or deasserts, if explicitly stated or indicated by context) the signal on a signal line coupled between the signal driving and signal receiving circuits. A signal line is said to be “activated” when a signal is asserted on the signal line, and “deactivated” when the signal is deasserted. Additionally, the prefix symbol “/” attached to signal names indicates that the signal is an active low signal (i.e., the asserted state is a logic low state). A line over a signal name (e.g., ‘
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/232,580 filed Sep. 21, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,283,074, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/120,439 filed May 2, 2005, and also claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/612,109, filed Sep. 21, 2004. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/232,580 and U.S. Provisional Application 60/612,109 are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4612533 | Evans | Sep 1986 | A |
4763105 | Jenq | Aug 1988 | A |
6384756 | Tajiri et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414612 | Quesenberry | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6522282 | Elbornsson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553066 | Pollet et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6701297 | Main | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6801145 | Asami | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7049984 | Wood et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7084793 | Elbornsson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7336729 | Agazzi | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7408495 | Stein et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7425908 | Gremillet | Sep 2008 | B2 |
20020007386 | Martin et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020106009 | Harrison et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020186799 | Sayeed | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030076899 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030118127 | Petting | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030231726 | Schuchert et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040082300 | Scheck | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050071403 | Tauntion | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050219091 | Wood et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO0207399 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080030387 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60612109 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11232580 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 11871953 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11120439 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11232580 | US |