Trenchless pipe replacement is useful for replacement of pipes without the need to excavate the length of the pipe to be replaced. An example of trenchless pipe replacement includes pulling a cutting blade with an expander through the pipe to be replaced, and attaching a new pipe behind the cutting blade. The pipe to be replaced is split, and pushed into the surrounding soil, and the new pipe, of equal or larger diameter, is pulled into the new space within the split pipe. Splitter are commonly used for small diameter pipes, and for pipes of a material that lends itself to splitting. Another example of trenchless pipe replacement includes pipe bursting.
Gas lines are one example of pipes where splitting is useful in pipe replacement. An example includes high density polyethylene (HDPE) gas pipe. Large quantities of 2 inch diameter HDPE gas pipes are currently in need of replacement. 300 miles of gas pipe in a single city in need of replacement is not uncommon. Given the desirability of minimizing trenches, it is also desirable to minimize the size of entry and exit pits for operating trenchless equipment. Cutting pipes in small entry and exit pits can be a challenge due to the small amount of available space to operate cutting tooling.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In the drawings, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments may be utilized and mechanical, structural, or logical changes, etc. may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
A cutter 114 is shown coupled to the front end 113 of the expander 112. In one example, the cutter 114 includes a jointed cutter that is allowed to pivot at the front end 113 of the expander 112. In one example, a ball joint 111 is included between the cutter 114 and the expander 112 to better navigate the pipe replacement device 100 through a pipe to be replaced. One particularly useful example is in trenchless replacement of polymeric pipe, such as buried natural gas lines.
In selected operations, such as splitting some types of polymeric pipe, a jointed cutter is advantageous. For example, selected polymeric pipe was placed in the ground by unrolling the pipe off a spool and loosely laying the pipe in a trench. When the pipe is later covered with dirt, a number of small curves may remain in the pipe as a result of shape memory from the spool which the pipe was unrolled from. These small curves can be difficult to navigate in a subsequent splitting operation of a trenchless replacement operation.
In one example, the ball joint 111 between the cutter 114 and the expander 112 is held together by pressure, and aligned by the towing cable 102. This configuration also makes modular substitution of components of the pipe replacement device 100. For example, a second cutter 116 is shown as an optional component for use with smaller diameter pipe. In one example, the second cutter 116 includes a tapered portion 115 that bridges a taper dimension between the cutter blades 117 and the starting diameter of the expander 112.
In one example, a floating cutter 120 is included in the pipe replacement device 100.
The floating cutter 120 allows great flexibility to split and/or weaken the pipe to be replaced ahead of the expander 112 and reciprocating hammer 110. Because the floating cutter is only constrained by the flexible towing cable 102, the floating cutter 120 more easily navigates curves in the pipe to be replaced, such as an uncoiled polymeric pipe as described above. Further, the floating cutter 120 is not constrained at the front of the expander 112 in the way that the cutter 114 is constrained. Because the floating cutter 120 is not coupled to a ball joint, or other joint, the only constraint on the floating cutter 120 is its connection to the towing cable 102. One technical challenge with trenchless replacement in curvy pipes is the length of the reciprocating hammer 110 which tends to direct the expander in a straight line. The addition of the floating cutter 120 in front of the expander 112 and reciprocating hammer 110 overcomes this challenge.
A lateral insertion pocket 214 is shown coupled to the opening 202. The lateral insertion pocket 214 is adapted to accept a removable anchor block 220 illustrated in place in
Due to high puling forces during a trenchless replacement operation, it can be difficult to remove a cable from the pipe replacement device 200 once the replacement is complete. Using configurations shown in the present disclosure, after a replacement operation, the removable anchor block 220 can be removed from the lateral insertion pocket 214 and disengaged from the cable with ease.
An attachment device 221 is shown within the removable anchor block 220. In one example, the attachment device 221 includes a tapered wedge tightener. In one example, the attachment device 221 is an active tapered wedge tightener, in contrast to a passive tapered wedge tightener that is tightened by pulling on the cable with friction to move the wedge segments. An actuator, such as the threaded fitting 224 is shown in
In one example, the lateral insertion pocket 214 is located within a taper region of the expander 212. In the example shown, the removable anchor block 220 includes a surface 225 that aligns with a taper of the expander 212. In this configuration, expansion of the pipe to be replaced is more consistent due to the surface 225, and debris is substantially prevented from falling into the lateral insertion pocket 214.
Also shown in
In one example, the cutting blades 600 are attached within the pockets 404 using an adhesive such as epoxy. In practice, if a cutting blade is to be replaced, a punch or other small tool is inserted within one or more holes 406 opposite the cutting blade 600. The bond between the cutting blade 600 and the pocket 404 can then be broken by hammering or otherwise driving the cutting blade 600 out of the pocket 404 from the back side.
As discussed above, splitting curved pipes such as polymeric natural gas lines can be problematic, and present a number of technical challenges. Curves in the pipe to be replaced cause increases in friction within the pipe and surrounding soil, and may require large pulling forces to advance a pipe replacement device such as described in embodiments above. Features such as a reciprocating hammer, a towing cable, jointed cutters, and floating cutters all provide enhancements to more effectively split old pipe, and advance new pipe into place as pulled behind the reciprocating hammer.
In selected embodiments, the reciprocating hammer is a pneumatically driven hammer, with a supply of compressed air being supplied from a pneumatic supply hose located within the pipe to be replaced. In selected embodiments, a lubricant is also supplied from a lubricant supply hose routed alongside the pneumatic supply hose.
As illustrated in
In one example, a motor 708 is located on the frame 704 of the supply device 700 to drive the reel 702 as needed. In one example, the motor 708 includes a hydraulic motor. A hydraulic motor is useful because other equipment located at the job site may also use hydraulic fluid for power. For example, a winch used to pull the towing cable may also use hydraulic drive.
In one example, a guide 706 is coupled to the frame 704 to direct the replacement pipe 750 from off of the reel 702 into an entry pit where the splitting and replacement operation begins. The guide 706 may include one or more rollers 707 to lower friction as the replacement pipe 750 is moved off the reel 702.
Because the pneumatic supply line 712 and the lubricant supply line 722 are located within the hub 703 of the reel 702, compressed air and lubricant can be delivered as needed, while replacement pipe is spooled off the reel, to pipe replacement devices such as examples 100, 200 described above.
Although a particularly useful example of splitting old curved polymeric natural gas lines is used as an example in selected descriptions above, the invention is not so limited. Other trenchless replacement operations with other pipe materials such as copper, lead, or other metals are also possible.
While a number of advantages of embodiments of the invention are described, any lists of above mentioned advantages are not intended to be exhaustive. Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiment shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present invention. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention includes any other applications in which the above structures and methods are used. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application is Divisional of U.S. Pat. No. 10,253,916, filed Dec. 29, 2017, which is a is Continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 9,885,441, filed Apr. 6, 2015, which is a Continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,998,538, filed Dec. 20, 2012, which is a Non Provisional of and claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e), to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/577,951, filed on Dec. 20, 2011, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3934647 | Bokenkamp | Jan 1976 | A |
4309128 | Williams | Jan 1982 | A |
4340322 | Springett et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4674914 | Wayman et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4719991 | Diehn et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4732222 | Schmidt | Mar 1988 | A |
4738565 | Streatfield et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4745879 | Shishkin et al. | May 1988 | A |
4776370 | Long, Jr. | Oct 1988 | A |
4930542 | Winkle et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4983071 | Fisk et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5076731 | Luksch | Dec 1991 | A |
5078546 | Fisk et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5112158 | Mcconnell | May 1992 | A |
5482404 | Tenbusch, II et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5544977 | Cravy et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5628585 | Parish, II et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636648 | O'brien et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5782311 | Wentworth | Jul 1998 | A |
5876152 | Hesse | Mar 1999 | A |
5984582 | Schwert | Nov 1999 | A |
6039505 | Tenbusch, II | Mar 2000 | A |
6092553 | Hodgson | Jul 2000 | A |
6098708 | Jenne | Aug 2000 | A |
6357967 | Putnam | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6382877 | Hodgson | May 2002 | B1 |
6588983 | Tenbusch, II | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6969216 | Driver | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969427 | Noles, Jr. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7086808 | Wentworth et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7384214 | Tjader | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398797 | Kamiyama et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7578636 | Tjader | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7624817 | Putnam | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641756 | Schwert | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7918626 | Venable | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8328468 | Tjader | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8403250 | Callahan | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8414225 | Tjader | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8596918 | Tjader | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8998538 | Tjader | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9885441 | Tjader | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20020102136 | Holland | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030017008 | Robinson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030044238 | Wentworth | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084764 | Wentworth | May 2003 | A1 |
20030178520 | Wivagg | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040218982 | Wentworth | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228691 | Tjader | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238675 | Banaszkiewicz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050051344 | Goss | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060088384 | Putnam | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070036613 | Tjader | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048091 | Tjader | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090285635 | Tjader | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100150659 | Kamiyama et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178113 | Tjader | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110079126 | Tjader | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081205 | Tjader | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110081206 | Tjader | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110206462 | Sutton | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110250020 | Carter | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130156507 | Tjader | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150098765 | Randa | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150198279 | Randa | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150211672 | Tjader | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150337895 | Bauck et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20180119867 | Tjader | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3902081 | Jul 1989 | DE |
3903864 | Jul 1989 | DE |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Advisory Action dated Sep. 4, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Advisory Action dated Sep. 30, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 4, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Response filed Apr. 15, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Response filed Aug. 18, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,004, Response filed Sep. 18, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Advisory Action dated Jul. 10, 2017”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Final Office Action dated May 31, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 25, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Response filed Jan. 23, 2017 to Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Response filed Jun. 19, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Response filed Mar. 14, 2016 to Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/679,384, Response filed Sep. 30, 2016 to Final Office Action dated May 31, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,120, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2018”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,120, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,120, Response filed Sep. 24, 2018 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190195414 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61577951 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15859120 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16287855 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14679384 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15859120 | US | |
Parent | 13722004 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14679384 | US |