Pipelined forward error correction for vector signaling code channel

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11804855
  • Patent Number
    11,804,855
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 17, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 31, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
Decoding sequentially received vector signaling codewords to obtain sequential sets of data bits, wherein elements of each vector signaling codeword are received in parallel over a plurality of wires, generating an incremental update of a plurality of error correction syndrome values based on each sequential set of data bits according to a check matrix, and upon decoding of a final vector signaling codeword, performing a final incremental update of the plurality of error correction syndrome values and responsively modifying data bits within the sequential sets of data bits by selecting a set of data bits from the sequential sets of data bits according to a symbol position index determined from the plurality of error correction syndrome values, the selected set of data bits altered according to a bit error mask determined from a first error correction syndrome value of the plurality of error correction syndrome values.
Description
REFERENCES

The following prior applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes:

  • U.S. Pat. No. 9,288,089 of application Ser. No. 12/784,414, filed May 20, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling” (hereinafter “Cronie I”).
  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/154,009, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,667,379, granted Dec. 8, 2011 and filed Jun. 5, 2011, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Error Control Coding for Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling” (hereinafter “Cronie II”).
  • U.S. Pat. No. 8,296,632 of application Ser. No. 12/479,605, filed Jun. 5, 2009, naming Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Encoding and decoding of generalized Reed-Solomon codes using parallel processing techniques” (hereinafter “Shokrollahi I”).
  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/612,241, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,100,232, granted Aug. 6, 2015 and filed Aug. 4, 2015, naming Amin Shokrollahi, Ali Hormati, and Roger Ulrich, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Low Power Chip-to-Chip Communications with Constrained ISI Ratio”, hereinafter identified as [Shokrollahi II].


The following additional references to prior art have been cited in this application:

  • “FEC Codes for 400 Gbps 802.3bs”, by Sudeep Bhoja, Vasu Parthasarathy, and Zhongfeng Wang, IEEE 802 Standards Working Group presentation archived at: www<dot>ieee802.org/3/bs/public/14_11/parthasarathy_3bs_01a_1114.pdf and herein identified as [Bhoja et al].


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Present embodiments relate to communications systems circuits generally, and more particularly to reduction of communication errors over a high-speed multi-wire interface used for chip-to-chip communication.


BACKGROUND

In modern digital systems, digital information is processed in a reliable and efficient way. In this context, digital information is to be understood as information available in discrete, i.e., discontinuous values. Bits, collection of bits, but also numbers from a finite set can be used to represent digital information.


In most chip-to-chip, or device-to-device communication systems, communication takes place over a plurality of wires to increase the aggregate bandwidth. A single or pair of these wires may be referred to as a channel or link and multiple channels create a communication bus between the electronic components. At the physical circuitry level, in chip-to-chip communication systems, buses are typically made of electrical conductors in the package between chips and motherboards, on printed circuit boards (“PCBs”) boards or in cables and connectors between PCBs. In high frequency applications, microstrip or stripline PCB traces may be used.


Common methods for transmitting signals over bus wires include single-ended and differential signaling methods. In applications requiring high speed communications, those methods can be further optimized in terms of power consumption and pin-efficiency, especially in high-speed communications. More recently, vector signaling methods have been proposed to further optimize the trade-offs between power consumption, pin efficiency and noise robustness of chip-to-chip communication systems. In such vector signaling systems, digital information at the transmitter is transformed into a different representation space in the form of a vector codeword that is chosen in order to optimize the power consumption, pin-efficiency and speed trade-offs based on the transmission channel properties and communication system design constraints. Herein, this process is referred to as “encoding”. The encoded codeword is communicated as a group of signals from the transmitter to one or more receivers. At a receiver, the received signals corresponding to the codeword are transformed back into the original digital information representation space. Herein, this process is referred to as “decoding”.


BRIEF DESCRIPTION

In conventional bit-serial communications systems, data words provided by a transmitting or source process are serialized into a sequential stream of bits, in one exemplary embodiment using a digital shift register. At the receiver, sequentially detected bits are deserialized using comparable means, so that a receiving or destination process may be presented with complete data words equivalent to those provided at the transmitter. Vector signaling code communication systems perform comparable operations, although in these embodiments the serialization process generally breaks words into symbol groups (e.g. into five bit elements for a CNRZ-5 system) and the equivalent deserialization process assembles received groups (of five bits, continuing the same example) into words again.


Forward Error Correction (FEC) methods have been developed which introduce redundancy into such transmitted data streams as part of a check code that both detects and facilitates correction of errors. In cases where the native communications link has relatively low uncorrected BER (e.g., 1×10−9 to 1×10−10 and the target BER is of the order of 1×10−15 to 1×10−20, a novel solution is described that can be computed at transmission during the serialization of emitted values, and can be verified during reception during deserialization, so that in the non-error case little or no additional latency is introduced into the communications path.


In some embodiments, a method includes decoding, using a vector signal code receiver, a predetermined number of sequentially received vector signaling codewords to obtain sequential sets of data bits, wherein elements of each vector signaling codeword are received in parallel over a plurality of wires, generating, using a FEC check circuit, an incremental update of a plurality of error correction syndrome values based on each sequential set of data bits according to a check matrix, and upon decoding of a final vector signaling codeword of the predetermined number of received vector signaling codewords, performing a final incremental update of the plurality of error correction syndrome values and responsively modifying data bits within the sequential sets of data bits by selecting a set of data bits from the sequential sets of data bits according to a symbol position index determined from the plurality of error correction syndrome values, the selected set of data bits altered according to a bit error mask determined from a first error correction syndrome value of the plurality of error correction syndrome values.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a prior art communications system to transmit data S from a transmitter 110 over a set of 125 collectively comprising the communications medium 120 to a receiver 130 outputting received data R.



FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of a transmitter incorporating the described Forward Error Correction in a data path utilizing multiple processing phases.



FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of a receiver incorporating the described Forward Error Correction in a data path utilizing multiple processing phases.



FIGS. 4A-4C are block diagrams for CRC word calculation, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIGS. 5A and 5B are block diagrams illustrating components of an error correction circuit, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 6 is a block diagram for identifying an erroneous data word position, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method, in accordance with some embodiments.



FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method of iteratively updating error correction syndrome values, in accordance with some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As described in [Cronie I], [Cronie II], and [Shokrollahi II], vector signaling codes may be used to produce extremely high bandwidth data communications links, such as between two integrated circuit devices in a system. As illustrated by the embodiment of FIG. 1, a data communications channel 120 composed of multiple wires 125 carries symbols of the vector signaling code, acting together to communicate codewords of the vector signaling code. Depending on the particular vector signaling code used, the number of channels including a communications link may range from two to eight or more, and may also communicate one or more clock signals on separate communications channels or as subchannel components of the vector signaling code. In the example of FIG. 1, communication link 120 is illustrated as being composed of eight wires 125, collectively communicating five data values 100 and one clock 105 between transmitter 110 and receiver 130. Further descriptions of such communications links are provided in [Shokrollahi II].


Individual symbols, e.g. transmissions on any single communications channel, may utilize multiple signal levels, often three or more. Operation at channel rates exceeding 10 Gbps may further complicate receive behavior by requiring deeply pipelined or parallelized signal processing. Embodiments described herein may also be applied to prior art permutation sorting methods not covered by the vector processing methods of [Shokrollahi II]. More generally, embodiments may apply to any communication or storage methods requiring coordination of multiple channels or elements of the channel to produce a coherent aggregate result.


Due to the characteristic of transmitting multiple symbols essentially in parallel, vector signaling codes are generally considered as communicating data in symbol groups, for example in five-bit increments for the CNRZ-5 code (also known as Glasswing Code) of [Shokrollahi II]. Thus, this document may subsequently describe transport as occurring in increments of K*n bits, where n is that code's symbol group or payload size. That reference additionally notes, however, that the encoded subchannels transporting individual bits are mathematically distinct, and in certain embodiments may be treated as independent transport channels.


Serialization and Deserialization


In conventional bit-serial communications systems, data words provided by a transmitting or source process are serialized into a sequential stream of bits, in one exemplary embodiment using a digital shift register. At the receiver, sequentially detected bits are deserialized using comparable means, so that a receiving or destination process may be presented with complete data words equivalent to those provided at the transmitter. Vector signaling code communication systems perform comparable operations, although in these embodiments the serialization process generally breaks words into symbol groups (e.g. into five bit elements for a CNRZ-5 system) and the equivalent deserialization process assembles received groups (of five bits, continuing the same example) into words again.


As is readily apparent, serialization and deserialization introduce latency into the communication channel, with the amount of latency dependent on the number of transmitted elements into which a given data word is serialized, as the entire word is not available until its last-transmitted element has been received and the received word fully reassembled.


In some high-speed communications systems, serialization and deserialization may additionally incorporate multiple processing phases operating essentially in parallel, to provide additional processing time within each phase and/or to permit processing operation using a lower clock rate to reduce power consumption. In one representative embodiment, data words presented by the transmission or source process are broken into words, with consecutive words being assigned to sequentially chosen processing phases which perform the necessary encoding, formatting, etc. As each processing phase completes its operations, the processed results are transferred to an output driver for transmission over the communications medium. Thus, in the case where four processing phases are used, each phase will have approximately four transmit unit intervals of time to perform the necessary operations. Similar multiphase processing may occur at the receiver; consecutively received words being detected by sequentially assigned processing phases and reassembled into output words.


Embodiments incorporating multiple processing phases are used herein as descriptive examples, so as to provide the broadest and most complete illustration of features and behaviors. Other embodiments may utilize fewer or more processing phases, including a single instance, and may incorporate greater or lesser amount of transmit and/or receive processing into the essentially parallel processing phases, with no limitation implied by these examples.


Link Error Correction


Communications system designs emphasize error-free transport of data, despite the inevitable presence of noise and other signal disruptions. Error probabilities over the communications path are expressed as a Bit Error Rate (BER), representing the ratio of bit errors received to overall bits transmitted.


Solutions to detect bit errors, including cyclic check codes, parity, and redundant transmission, are known in the art. Similarly, solutions are known for correction of errors, most notably the closed-loop retransmission methods of the TCP/IP protocol suite, in which a receiver detects an error, uses a return channel to request a retransmission by the transmitter, and then transparently inserts the corrected data into its output stream. Further, the term of art “cyclic redundancy check (CRC)” is used herein to describe any set of computed bits augmenting a data stream to enable error identification and correction.


Forward Error Correction


Where use of a return channel is impossible or the round-trip latency of waiting for a retransmission is unacceptable, Forward Error Correction (FEC) methods have been developed which introduce redundancy into the transmitted data stream as part of a check code that both detects and facilitates correction of errors. The more redundancy introduced into the transmitted data stream (e.g. by use of a longer FEC sequence) the greater the ability of the FEC to correct bit errors, but also the greater the protocol overhead, presenting itself as a lower effective data transmission rate.


As noted in [Bhoja et al.], several FEC techniques have been proposed for use over high speed communications links, including the KR4 and KP4 codes as defined for 802.3bj, as well as BCH codes, for example of length 2864 and dimension 2570. Further examples include the Reed-Solomon codes described in [Shokrollahi I] and the Hamming, Hadamard, Reed-Muller, Golay, and Low-Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes of [Cronie II]. These error correction methods target communications links with relatively high uncorrected BER (on the order of 1×10−5 to 1×10−3) while delivering corrected error rates on the order of 1×10−15, thus they rely on computing a relatively long check sequence over a large block of data. The resulting error correction latencies are on the order of many tens of nano-seconds (e.g. 100 ns, as reported by [Bhoja et al.]) with correspondingly large computational power consumption.


In cases where the native communications link has relatively low uncorrected BER (e.g., 1×10−9 to 1×10−10) and the target BER is of the order of 1×10−15 to 1×10−20, other solutions can be found with much lower latency. This is the case, for example, for in-package die-to-die links that use vector signaling codes, such as the Glasswing or CNRZ-5 code of [Shokrollahi II].


For vector signaling codes transmitting n bits at a time over m wires, it is advantageous to work with an FEC operating in the Galois field GF(2n) since an error in the communication link is likely to cause errors on all n bits.


Pipelining Error Correction Processing


One embodiment of a link-optimized Forward Error Correction uses sequential data word transmission by the transport level vector signaling code to minimize perceived error correction latency. In such an embodiment, a vector signaling code transport communicates groups of n bits over m wires. Transmission of N consecutive groups thus transfers N*n bits, consisting of K*n data bits and R*n CRC bits for error correction. At the transmitter, a data source provides the K*n data bits, typically as multiple transfers over a wide parallel interface, with a similar interface delivering the received K*n data bits to a data sink at the receiver.


As a specific example offered without implying limitation, we consider n=5 and m=6 for a CNRZ-5 transport and N=32 a typical message length. This may equivalently be interpreted as 5 simultaneous streams each transmitting 32 consecutive bits. A Forward Error Correction code over GF(2n) operating on 5-bit words will be capable of correcting one bit error. If p is the input BER, and assuming random and independent errors on every stream from UI to UI (but not independent among the 5 bits making up the word in every UI), then the output BER after decoding is at most










1
+

q

N

-


(

1
-
q

)

N

-

2

N



q

(

1
-
q

)


N
-
1



-

q
N


N




(

Eqn
.

1

)








where q=1−(1−p)5, and N=32. To achieve an output BER of 1×10−15, an input BER p of 8×10−10 is sufficient. The rate of this code is 15/16=93.75%, hence the rate loss is 6.25%. In such embodiments, at 26.66 Gbaud, the interface may transmit 5*26.66*0.9375=125 Gbps of data over 6 wires.


Transmission with FEC


At the transmitter, this embodiment performs the following operations:


The 5 bits to be transmitted at each Unit Interval (UI) are treated as elements of the field GF(32). For example, If n0, n1, n2, n3, n4 denote the 5 bits, wherein n0 is the lowest significant bit of n and n4 is the highest significant bit, then n corresponds to the element

n0+n1*x+n2*x2+n3*x3+n4*x4 mod f(x)  (Eqn. 2)

and f(x) is the polynomial x5+x3+1


A check matrix of elements of GF(32) with 2 rows and 30 columns is used. In one embodiment, the elements in column j of this matrix are 1 and aj, where the element aj of GF(32) is the binary expansion of an integer j, that is, aj is represented as the binary vector [j0 j1 j2 j3 j4], where j0+2*j1+4*j2+8*j3+16*j4=j. While other embodiments may use alternate check matrices, use of the check matrix using the binary expansion of the integer j as the second row of elements results in efficiencies in calculating the error position vector that identifies which received symbol contains the error(s). In particular, this obviates the need to use the Berlekamp Massey algorithm (including the associated Chien search). In addition, directly calculating the bit error mask using the row of 1's in the check matrix obviates the need to use Forney's formula to determine the error magnitude. Equation 3 for calculating r0 and r1 using the check matrix described above is given below:











[



1


1





1


1





a
0




a
1







a

2

8





a

2

9





]

·

[




m
0






m
1











m
28






m
29




]


=

[




r
0






r
1




]





(

Eqn
.

3

)







In equation 3, the check matrix including two rows of constants (one row of all 1's and one row of a0-a29) is modulo-multiplied by a vector including the 30 data symbols m0-m29 to generate the CRC words r0 and r1.


If the incoming 30 5-bit data words (the bits of which will be communicated essentially simultaneously on the 5 CNRZ-5 sub-channels) are denoted by m0, m1, . . . , m29, then the two CRC 5-bit words, denoted r0 and r1, are obtained as r0=m0⊕m1⊕ . . . ⊕m29 and r1=a0·m0⊕a1·m1⊕ . . . ⊕a29·m29 wherein a b denotes the multiplication of a and b in the field GF(32) and ⊕ denotes the bit-wise XOR operation. Thus, r1 may be generated by incrementally updating the previously stored value of r1 in the jth unit interval by providing a bit-wise XOR of the previously stored value of r1 with the modulo-multiplied result of aj·mj, and the final value of r1 is generated upon the final incremental update.


The message data m0, m1, . . . m29 corresponds to 5-bit words at time instance 0, 1, . . . , 29; therefore, the computation of CRC words r0, r1 can be done incrementally, as the data becomes available. The computation is equivalent to


Set r0=r1=0


For j from 0 to 29 do

r0[i]=r0[i]⊕mj[i]
r1=r1⊕aj·mj



FIG. 4A includes a schematic for calculating values of r0, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, a given value of r0 is updated by XORing 403 the previously stored value 402 of r0 with a corresponding bit in an associated position of data word mj. For example, r0 [0] may be XOR'd with mj[0], r0 [1] may be XOR'd with mj[1], etc. Thus for index i, with 0≤i≤4, r0[i]=m0[i]⊕m1[i]⊕ . . . ⊕m29[i]. Such an embodiment may operate recursively, e.g. when each bit mj[i] becomes available. In such an embodiment, each data bit mj[i] may be provided via a shift register, for example. Alternatively the computation may be performed all at once when all of the data words are available, using a logical XOR tree shown in FIG. 4B for example.


As described above, calculating r1 includes modulo-reduced multiplication of a aj element from the GF(32) matrix with a corresponding data word mj, and XORing the results together. In some embodiments, an FEC encoder may form an XOR tree 404 as shown in FIG. 4B. Such an XOR tree may be formed using a known logic combination, such as the combinations for calculating r0 and r1 given in Appendix A. Such an embodiment may obtain all the data bits (150 in the above examples) prior to performing the calculation using an XOR tree. FIG. 4B illustrates one particular example for calculating r1[0]. In such an embodiment, the inputs 405 may be predetermined, and selected according to the bits used to update r1[0] according to Appendix A.



FIG. 4C is a schematic of an alternative logic circuit for incrementally updating a given bit r1[0] as part of CRC word r1, in accordance with some embodiments. In the schematic of FIG. 4C, the values of r1 may be incrementally updated according to CRC calculations corresponding to a modulo-multiplications of a set of data bits of a given symbol with a symbol index from the check matrix. In such an embodiment, the updating may be performed as the bits from each set of data bits of symbols m0-m29 becomes available, thus reducing latency. As shown, FIG. 4C includes a storage element 407 holding a current value of r1[0]. The current value r1[0] is XOR'd 410 with a sequence of the K*n data bits determined by the CRC calculation, the ith bit of the FEC data bits denoted as inp[i]. The notational sequence inp[i] represents the input data being processed, where inp[0 . . . 4] are the 5 bits of data word m0, inp[5 . . . 9] are the 5 bits of data word m1, inp[145 . . . 149] are the 5 bits of symbol m29 using the above embodiment having K=30 sets of n=5 data bits.


The current value r1[0] may not be updated for every bit of the K*n data bits, thus an associated enable signal EN is used to selectively update the current value of r1[0] according to a predetermined set of bits (See Appendix A). As shown, the K*n data bits are serially input into the XOR 410 using a shift register 415, which may obtain the bits from data buffer 210 in the transmitter, in some embodiments (not shown).


In receiver embodiments calculating r1′, shift register 415 may be connected to processing phases 330, as shown in FIG. 4C. Alternatively, each phase may have a corresponding shift register, all of which may be multiplexed (not shown). In some embodiments, shift register 415 may be parallel loaded. In such embodiments, shift register 415 may include a plurality of D Flip-Flops that may be loaded in parallel, and serially shifted out to XOR 410. Block 417 illustrates one storage element of shift register 415, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, storage element 417 is connected to the outputs of MIC0 of each of the four processing phases 330, denoted here as p0[0]-p3[0] Further, a phase selection signal denoted ‘phase_sel’ is used to select which phase to load the storage element 417 with. In some embodiments, the selected phase may be provided to the block via a multiplexor accepting the phases, and the select signal may take the form of a two-bit clock counter to select which phase loads the register (not shown). While storage element 417 receives outputs from MIC0 of each processing phase, each other storage element of the shift register 415 may similarly receive a corresponding MIC output of the plurality of processing phases. For example, storage element 419 may receive the output of MIC1 of each processing phase.



FIG. 4C further includes a counting circuit used to generate partial enable signals, including partial enable signals 4, 5, and 7, which may then be combined to form a corresponding global enable signal EN for bit r1[0]. As shown, the counting circuit includes a counter 420 and a plurality of AND logic gates 422a, 422b, and 422c. In some embodiments, the counter is configured to count from i=0 to i=K*n−1, i being an index associated with a corresponding data bit inp[i] of the K*n data bits. The output of the current value i of the counter 420 may be represented as a set of bits (shown as X, Y, Z in FIG. 4C). AND logic gates 422a-c receive bits X, Y, Z, each AND gate 422a-c having a corresponding combination of inverting and non-inverting inputs such that for each count value i, only one of the partial enable signals is logic ‘1’ at a given count value, and all the rest are logic ‘0’. In some embodiments, a respective global enable signal EN for each bit of the CRC words r1 is formed by OR'ing 425 the partial enable signals associated with the indices i of the bits in the predetermined set of known bits. In the illustrative example of FIG. 4C, r1[0] is only updated using bits inp[4] and inp[7]. Thus, the global enable EN is formed by OR'ing partial enables 4 and 7, and r1[0] is updated when count i=4 and 7, using bits inp[4] and inp[7], respectively. For illustrative purposes only, counter 420 only shows 3 bits X, Y, Z forming a binary count value i, however it should be noted counter 420 may include any number of bits. For example, in the examples given above and in Appendix A, the counter may form count values i having 8 bits to count from i=0 to i=149 (resetting at 1=149), to update the bits of CRC word r1.


The embodiments illustrated by FIGS. 4A-4C are just some examples of a logic circuit that may be hardwired to implement the calculation of each bit of the CRC words r0 and r1. There may be various other logic designs to perform such a calculation. For example, alternative embodiments may utilize a processor running a software application to calculate the variables.


Once the incoming data is processed completely CRC words r0 and r1 are transmitted as the last two words, herein identified as m30 and m31. In an alternative embodiment, the transmitter may first calculate r0 and r1 based on the available buffered transmit data and transmit the five bits of r0 and the five bits of r1 using the first and second vector signaling codewords. In this embodiment, the decoder may then advantageously initialize the decoding circuit (FEC check circuit used to calculate syndrome values) using those two check values.


Since the elements a0, a1, . . . , a29 are known in advance, whereas m0, m1, . . . , m29 are variable, each of the multiplications in GF(32) can be done through a sequence of XOR operations on the 5 bits. This is done via a “regular representation of the field GF(32)” as is known to those of skill in the art. In this representation, each of the elements a0, a1, . . . , a29 is represented as a 5×5 matrix of bits, and the multiplication a[j]·m[j] then corresponds to the multiplication of this matrix with the vector representing m[j].


One embodiment of a sequence of such operations is provided in Appendix A for a particular regular representation of GF(32), without implying limitation. Many other representations can also be used which would lead to similar results.


The computations at the transmitter are preferably done concurrently with the serialization step; that is, as each incremental data group becomes available and is prepared for transmission. This “pipelining” of the FEC computation avoids the additional latency that is often encountered when using forward error correction techniques. In embodiments utilizing multiple essentially parallel processing phases in the transmission process, elements of the computation of r0, r1 can be done within each processing phase. In some embodiments, at least one such processing phase incorporates XOR logic to facilitate at least a portion of such computation.



FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a transmitter using the CNRZ-5 code of [Shokrollahi II.] Transmit Data is accepted into Data Buffer 210; typically, the source of this data will preferentially transfer data as words of, as examples offered without limitation, 16, 32, or 64 bits. Data Buffer 210 accepts these input word transfers, and outputs symbols m0, m1, . . . m29 corresponding to sets of data bits (in this example, each symbol corresponding a set of five data bits) with successive symbol distributed 215 to processing phases phase0, phase1, phase2, phase3, and so on in a circular sequence over all processing phases 220. Within each processing phase 220, the previously described FEC computation 221 is performed on each set of five data bits, as they are simultaneously CNRZ-5 Encoded 222. Under control of Clock Generator 250, each processing phase produces a result that is selected by multiplexor 230, with the output symbols 235 presented to Line Driver 240 to be emitted over the communications channel comprised of wires W0-W7. As described in [Shokrollahi II], Tx Clock 255 is also produced by Clock Generator 250 and emitted by Line Drivers 240 as part of the transmitted output on wires W6 and W7 in the example of FIG. 2.


The multiple instances of FEC computation 221 may access a common set of registers or storage elements to update CRC words r0, r1 during processing of the first 30 output words utilizing data obtained from Data Buffer 210, following which a FEC processing element in a processing phase will output r0 as the 31st output word to be encoded by encoder 222, and a FEC processing element in the next selected processing phase will output r1 as the 32nd output word to be encoded by vector signal encoder 222.


Reception and Error Correction


At the receiver, a compatible embodiment performs a similar set of CRC computations. 32 5-bit words are received one after another, with the first 5-bit word, called m0 arriving at time 0, and the 32nd 5-bit word, called m31, arriving at time (UI*31), where UI is the transport's unit interval for symbol transmission. In such an embodiment, local CRC words r0′ and r1′ are generated, and error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″ are finalized by comparing local CRC words r0′ and r1′ to received CRC words r0 and r1. Alternatively, FEC check circuit 332 may be initialized by receiving CRC words r0 and r1 from the transmitter first, and incrementally updating the plurality of error correction syndrome values initialized by received CRC words r0 and r1 according to the sequential sets of data bits.


In a first step of receive error correction, the operations in Appendix A are executed, preferably concurrent with the deserialization step for the first 30 data words, to incrementally calculate values for local CRC words r0′ and r1′. As with the transmitter, each of these incremental calculations is performed using only the 5 bit word value received and the values being incrementally computed. As described for the transmitter, one embodiment incorporates XOR logic to perform at least part of this computation in at least one of multiple receive processing phases. In some embodiments, similar circuits as shown in FIGS. 4A-4C may be used to calculate the values of r0′ and r1′. In some embodiments, local CRC words r0′ and r1′ may be calculated as bits from the data words m0-m29 become available, while alternative embodiments may calculate r0′ and r1′ once all of the data words have been received.


Once the first 30 received sets of data bits are processed to incrementally update a plurality of error correction syndrome values, preferably during the deserialization step, r0′ is XOR'd with the received CRC word m30 (r0) and r1′ is XOR'd with the received CRC word m31 (r1) to generate error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″, respectively. For the purposes of description, r0″ and r1″ may be referred to both as error correction syndrome values (upon the final incremental update), as well as syndrome words At this point, r0″ and r1″ contain the so-called “syndromes” of the forward error correcting code. If either r0″ or r1″ is zero, then there has been no error among the transmitted sets of data bits m0, . . . , m29, and no further processing is necessary. It is possible that there could have been an error among these words that was not caught by the incremental updates of the error correction syndrome values, but the frequency of such undetected errors is within the corrected BER as calculated above. At least one embodiment utilizes multiple receive processing phases, each receive processing phase incorporating logic configured to perform at least a portion of the operations in Appendix A or their logical equivalent, and configured to perform the described XOR operations to obtain the FEC syndromes.


In some embodiments, the plurality of error correction syndrome values of the FEC circuit at the receiver may be initialized by receiving CRC words r0 and r1 from the transmitter in the first two unit intervals, and thus r0″ and r1″ can be calculated directly due to the incremental updates based on the obtained sequential sets of data bits. In some embodiments, the FEC check circuit may perform bit-wise iterative calculations in the circuit, as shown in FIG. 4C, however, alternative embodiments may implement predetermined combinatorial logic circuits based on logical expressions, e.g., those listed in Appendix A, to update the error correction syndrome values using one or more of the set of decoded data bits. Such a circuit may be similar to the combinatorial logic circuit of FIG. 4B, however as not all the data bits may not be available to the receiver at one time, the combinatorial logic circuit may be hardcoded to update the error correction syndrome values using bits selected according to the index of the current received set of data bits in the current received symbol. For example, error correction syndrome value r1[1] may be updated using one bit of symbol m0 (inp[1] of Appendix A), and then r1[1] may subsequently be updated using three bits of symbol m1 (inp[5], inp[6], and inp[7]). A control logic may be hardcoded according to Appendix A to provide such incremental updates. Alternatively, a control logic may be coded to implement binary modulo arithmetic according to the algorithm for calculating r1 described in the pseudocode above.


If both error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″ are non-zero, the received data bits are corrected for errors; r0″ is the 5-bit error mask, and the symbol position index of the symbol containing the error is determined by the vector r1″/r0″, where division is interpreted in the field GF(32). The error correction operations of computing the error index r1″/r0″ and the XOR of the error mask onto the word mt may occur after the deserialization step. Here symbol position index t=pos−1, where pos is the integer representation of r1″/r0″. In one embodiment offered as an example without implying limitation after pos=r1“/r0” is computed, a barrel shifter performs a bit-wise XOR function by applying the bit error mask r0″ to values of the selected set of data bits mt.


More precisely, the decoding can be described by the following pseudo-code:


IF r0″≠0 AND r1″≠0 THEN






    • Compute x[0], . . . , x[4] via the procedure in Appendix B

      Set pos=x[0]+2x[1]+4x[2]+8x[3]+16x[4]
      Set t=pos−1
      Set mt[0]:=mt[0]⊕r0″[0]
      Set mt[1]:=mt[1]⊕r0″[1]
      Set mt[2]:=mt[2]⊕r0″[2]
      Set mt[3]:=mt[3]⊕r0″[3]
      Set mt[4]:=mt[4]⊕r0″[4]





As stated above, r1″ is divided by r0″ in order to obtain the symbol position index (represented in the following equation 4 as b):










[




r
0







r
1





]

=


err
[



1




b



]

=

[




e

r

r






e

r


r

(
b
)





]






(

Eqn
.

4

)








FIG. 5A is a block diagram of one embodiment of an error correction circuit 560 connected to FEC check circuit 510, in accordance with some embodiments. In some embodiments, error correction circuit 560 may correspond to error correction 360 shown in FIG. 3. As shown, FEC check circuit 510 sequentially obtains the 150 data bits from the thirty decoded 5-bit data words, and 10 bits making up the received CRC words r0, and r1. The FEC check circuit 510 generates incremental updates to a plurality of error correction syndrome values. In some embodiments, error correction syndrome values in the FEC check circuit are initialized to be quiescent (all zeroes), and the FEC check circuit generates local CRC words r0′, r1′ based on the received data bits, and in the final incremental update, the FEC check circuit XORs r0⊕r0′ and r1⊕r1′ to generate error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″, respectively. Alternatively, as previously described, the CRC words r0 and r1 may be received from the transmitter in the first unit intervals, and the error correction syndrome values may be initialized with the received CRC words. The FEC check circuit 510 may then subsequently generate incremental updates to the error correction syndrome values, and upon the final incremental update, the error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″ are complete without the need to perform the additional XOR step of the previous embodiment. In some embodiments, the FEC check circuit 510 may operate similarly to the CRC word generators shown in FIGS. 4A-4C, with the added functionality of generating the error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″. Then, the error correction circuit 560 may use the completed error correction syndrome values to identify if an error is present. As mentioned above, if either r0″ or r1″ are 0, then no error correction is performed by the error correction circuit. If error mask r0″ is “00000”, then an XOR of the selected symbol is unchanged, while r1″ being “00000” indicates the error is in the received CRC words r0 or r1, and thus the correction circuit may disregard this scenario, and there is no correction of the data bits. If both of the error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″ are non-zero, the location of the set of data bits of the symbol containing the error is determined by performing the above-mentioned r1″/r0″ to identify a 5 bit symbol position index x[0]-x[4] used to identify the symbol position containing the error. In FIG. 5A r1″/r0″ is performed by calculating






r



1


·

1

r


0










by finding the bit-representation of the reciprocal of r0″. In some embodiments, the conversion 520 may be done using a lookup table. Following this conversion, r1″ may be multiplied 525 by






1

r


0








using modulo reduction techniques to find the symbol position index x[0]-x[4] of the erroneous data word. As described above, the decimal representation of symbol position index x[0]-x[4] may be referred to below as pos, and continuing the above example, 1≤pos≤30.


The bits x[0]-x[4] of the symbol position index, the bit error mask r0″, and the sequential sets of data bits of the received data may be provided to a set of registers 565 to provide the error correction by altering a selected set of data bits. FIG. 5B illustrates a set of registers 565, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, registers 565 include a first register 530 holding the sequential sets of data bits corresponding to received data. A second register 535 contains the bit error mask r0″ used to correct a set of data bits of the received data in a position determined by the bits x[0]-x[4] of the symbol position index, and the rest of the second register 535 includes logic zero values so as to not alter any other bits of the received data. The first and second registers may be element-wise XOR'd in order to produce a corrected set of data in a third register 540, which may then be output from the system. In the example of FIG. 5B, the symbol position index identifies that the set of data bits corresponding to symbol m14 need to be corrected, and the received set of bits corresponding to symbol m14 are XOR'd with the bit error mask corresponding to error correction syndrome value r0″.


As described above, a LUT may be implemented to find the reciprocal of r0″. An example LUT performing such a function is given in Appendix C. Once the reciprocal of r0″ is obtained, it can be multiplied by r1″ to obtain the values of x[0]-x[4] discussed above. The following logical circuit-based operation may perform such a multiplication, in some embodiments, where inv_r0″ is the reciprocal (or multiplicative inverse) of r0″ obtained using the LUT of Appendix C, the “&” symbol represents a logical AND, and the “⊕” symbol represents the logical XOR:

x[1]=inv_r0″[0]&r1″[0]⊕(inv_r0″[4]&r1″[1]⊕(inv_r0″[3]&r1″[2]⊕(inv_r0″[2]&r1″[3]⊕(inv_r0 [1]⊕inv_r0″[4])&r1″[4])));
x[1]=inv_r0″[1]&r1″[0]⊕(inv_r0″[0]&r1″[1]⊕(inv_r0″[4]&r1″[2]⊕(inv_r0″[3]&r1″[3]⊕inv_r0″[2]&r1″[4])));
x[2]=inv_r0″[2]&r1″[0]⊕((inv_r0″[1]⊕inv_r0″[4])&r1″[1]⊕((inv_r0″[0]⊕inv_r0″[3])&r1″[2]⊕((inv_r0″[2]⊕inv_r0″[4])&r1″[3]⊕(inv_r0″[1]⊕(inv_r0″[3]⊕inv_r0″[4]))&r1″[4])));
x[3]=inv_r0″[3]&r1″[0]⊕(inv_r0″[2]&r1″[1]⊕((inv_r0″[1]⊕inv_r0″[4])&r1″[2]⊕((inv_r0″[0]⊕inv_r0″[3])&r1″[3]⊕(inv_r0″[2]⊕inv_r0″[4])&r1″[4])));
x[4]=inv_r0″[4]&r1″[0]⊕(inv_r0″[3]&r1″[1]⊕(inv_r0″[2]&r1″[2]⊕((inv_r0″[1]⊕inv_r0″[4])&r1″[3]⊕(inv_r0″[0]⊕inv_r0″[3])&r1″[4])));


The above computation and the associated LUT describe only one possible embodiment of the error correction circuit, and many alternative logic functions performing equivalently the same functions may be used. In some embodiments of the error correction circuit, the above may be implemented through the use of a physical logic circuit, while alternative embodiments may perform the calculations using software running on a processor.


Once the error correction circuit obtains the location pos−1 of the erroneous data word and the bit error mask r0″, the error correction circuit aligns the error mask with the correct symbol in the received data 530, using e.g., registers, and perform an XOR operation. FIG. 5B illustrates a correction of symbol m14. As shown, the bit error mask r0″ may be loaded into a location of a correction register 535, the location determined by a symbol position index associated with symbol m14. In at least one embodiment, the starting bit of the selected set of data bits corresponding to the erroneous data word may be the length of each received data word ‘n’ times the symbol position index (pos−1). Lastly, a data register 530 containing the 150 bits of received data and the correction register 535 including the bit error mask r0″ and the rest logic zero values may be XOR'd together to obtain a set of corrected data bits 540, which may then be output from the system.



FIG. 6 illustrates one particular example of a logic circuit for implementing division block 515 of error correction circuit 560. As shown, the logic circuit is configured to calculate a portion x[k] of the symbol position index pos of the erroneous data word in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, FIG. 6 includes storage element 605 holding a current value, shown as x[0] in this example. The value x[0] is updated by XOR'ing 610 the current value of x[0] with a selected combination of bits of the error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″. In some embodiments, the process is hard-coded using a multiplexor 615 connected to an AND gate network 620, and a selection signal (a simple count for example) incrementally selects a combination of bits of error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″. In at least one embodiment, the sequence of logic combinations provided to the XOR gate 610 selected by the select signal to update x[0] may be pre-determined according to the incremental process of Appendix B. Further, a similar logic circuit may implement respective predetermined updating sequences for the other bits of index x[k] The logic circuit of FIG. 6 is simply one example of how a given bit of x[k] may be generated, there may be alternative circuit implementations that accomplish the same goal. Alternatively, a processor may run a software algorithm to implement the process of Appendix B.


Because some of the error correction processing occurs outside of deserialization, it is desirable to reduce the total delay caused by these operations as much as possible to minimize the impact on perceived latency. Such design optimization may be addressed using known art design automation tools. However, it may be beneficial to furnish such a tool with a good starting point for the search of a representation that minimizes the logic depth of the computation, and one suitable embodiment is given in Appendix B. Without further optimization, the logic depth of that embodiment is at most 7. Embodiments described above may be useful in correcting errors caused by bursts of energy hitting the wires of the multi-wire bus. For example, if a burst of electromagnetic energy hits one or more wires on the multi-wire bus, it could introduce one or more errors into bits of a decoded data word. These errors may be identified by a bit error mask at the output, the bit error mask used to correct the one or more bit errors in a selected erroneous data word identified by so-called error correction syndrome values.



FIG. 3 illustrates a typical CNRZ-5 vector signal code receiver embodiment utilizing Multi-Input Comparators 320 to detect five data results MIC0-MIC 4 and one received clock CK. Wire signals W0-W5 are equalized by Continuous Time Linear Equalizer (CTLE) 310, and presented to the set of MICs 320 described by [Shokrollahi II], producing the detected data values MIC0-MIC4. Furthermore, wires W6 and W7 may also be equalized by CTLE 310 (not shown) As shown in FIG. 3, the set of MICs 320 includes five comparator circuits, each MIC corresponding to a linear amplifier circuit performing a linear combination of wire signals present on wires W0-W5 only, the wire signals corresponding to symbols of a vector signaling codeword of a vector signaling code. As described in [Shokrollahi II], each MIC may perform a respective linear combination defined by a respective sub-channel of a plurality of mutually orthogonal sub-channels, that may be defined by a receiver matrix. In FIG. 3 wires W6 and W7 are wires dedicated to carrying a differential clock signal, and differential comparator 340 operates on wires W6 and W7 to generate the received clock signal CK. Other embodiments may forego using dedicated wires W6 and W7 to carry a differential clock signal and may transmit a clock using a dedicated sub-channel of the aforementioned mutually orthogonal sub-channels, e.g., as output MIC4. Alternatively, a clock signal may be extracted using transition information from the detected data outputs MIC0-MIC4 (i.e., data-derived clock recovery).


The detected data values MIC0-MIC4 are presented to four processing phases 330, each of which processes the received data for one unit interval, and the received clock CK is presented to Clock Recovery 390, which in turn produces generates four sequential clock phases ph000, ph090, ph180, ph270 that collectively coordinates operation of processing phases 330. Within each processing phase, comparator outputs MIC0-MIC4 are Sampled 331 at the time determined by that phase's clock, producing sequential sets of five-bit words m0-m29 and received CRC words (r0 and r1) which are presented to Buffer 370. The receiver of FIG. 3 also includes an FEC check circuit 332 configured to incrementally update a plurality of error correction syndrome values based on each sequential set of data bits. In some embodiments, the plurality of error correction syndrome values are initialized to logic zero values, and FEC check circuit generates a set of n-bit local CRC words r0′, r1′ based on the received sequential sets of data bits, and forms n-bit error correction syndrome values (r0″ and r1″) upon decoding of a final vector signaling codeword by forming a comparison of the local CRC words r0′, r1′ to the received CRC words r0, r1. The error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″ identify if an error is present. In alternative embodiments, the transmitter may transmit CRC words r0 and r1 first to initialize the plurality of error correction syndrome values and may subsequently transmit the plurality of sets of data bits. In such an embodiment, upon the decoding of the final vector signaling codeword, the plurality of error correction syndrome values r0″ and r1″ are complete, and thus the final comparison step may be omitted. As in the transmitter, receiver Buffer 370 accepts five bit received data values from processing phases 330 and assembles them into data words Receive Data Out. The receiver further includes an Error Correction circuit 360 configured to alter bits received in error within buffer 370 as described by the error correction algorithm of Appendix B. In some embodiments, in response to there being an error present, Error Correction circuit 360 generates a corrected set of data bits by correcting one or more errors in a selected set of data bits associated with a symbol position index determined from the plurality of error correction syndrome values, the one or more errors corrected using a bit error mask determined from a first error correction syndrome value r0″.



FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method 700, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, method 700 includes receiving, at step 702, a sequence of codewords having m symbols, and responsively forming a plurality of sets of n comparator outputs at step 704, wherein n is an integer greater than or equal to 3. At step 706, the comparator outputs are sampled, and a plurality of n-bit words are detected 706, the plurality of n-bit words including data words and cyclic-redundancy check (CRC) words. At step 708, a set of n-bit local CRC words are generated based on the received data words. At step 710, n-bit syndrome words (e.g., the aforementioned error correction syndrome values) are formed based on (i) a set of local CRC calculations determined according to the received plurality of n-bit data words, and (ii) the received CRC words, the syndrome words identifying if an error is present. In response to an error being present, the method corrects 712 one or more errors in an erroneous data word having an index identified by a combination of the n-bit syndrome words, the one or more errors corrected using a bit error mask corresponding to one of the syndrome words.


In some embodiments, generating the local CRC words includes performing logical XOR functions on bits of the data words. In some embodiments, performing the logical XOR includes generating bits in position index i of a first local CRC word by XORing bits in position index i of each data word, wherein 0≤i≤n−1. In some embodiments, generating at least one local CRC word includes performing a modulo-reduced multiplication of each data word and a corresponding index of the data word, and recursively performing a logic XOR of each modulo-reduced multiplied data word.


In some embodiments, the set of local CRC words are updated recursively as each data word is received. Alternatively, the local CRC words may be generated subsequent to all of the data words being received.


In some embodiments, an error is present if each syndrome word is non-zero.


In some embodiments, identifying the index of the erroneous data word includes forming a binary reciprocal of the bit-error mask representing one of the syndrome words, and forming a modulo-reduced multiplication with a second syndrome word. In some embodiments, the binary reciprocal may be formed using a lookup table (LUT). In some embodiments, correcting the error comprises XORing the erroneous data word with the bit-error mask.



FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method 800, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, method 800 includes decoding 802, using a vector signal code receiver, a predetermined number of sequentially received vector signaling codewords to obtain sequential sets of data bits, wherein elements of each vector signaling codeword are received in parallel over a plurality of wires. Incremental updates of a plurality of error correction syndrome values are generated 804 by an FEC check circuit based on each sequential set of data bits according to a check matrix. Upon decoding of a final vector signaling codeword of the predetermined number of received vector signaling codewords and performing a final incremental update of the plurality of error correction syndrome values, data bits are modified within the sequential sets of data bits by selecting 806 a set of data bits from the sequential sets of data bits according to a symbol position index determined from the plurality of error correction syndrome values, and altering 808 the selected set of data bits according to a bit error mask determined from a first error correction syndrome value of the plurality of error correction syndrome values.


In some embodiments, generating the incremental updates of the plurality of error correction syndrome values includes performing a logical XOR operation on a previously-stored error correction syndrome value based on a given set of data bits. In some embodiments, the logical XOR operation is performed by performing a bit-wise XOR of the previously stored error correction syndrome value with the given set of data bits. Such an operation may be applicable when incrementally updating error correction syndrome values corresponding to r0″. Alternatively, the logical XOR operation is performed by performing a logical XOR of the previously stored error correction syndrome value with bits determined by a CRC calculation corresponding to a result of a modulo-multiplication of the given set of data bits of a received data word mj with a binary expansion of symbol index integer j. Such an XOR operation may be applicable when incrementally updating error correction syndrome values corresponding to r1″. For example, CRC calculation may include modulo-multiplying the 5-bit data word m13 by the 5-bit binary expansion of the integer j=‘13’, the CRC calculation subsequently XOR'd with the previously stored 5 bit r1 error correction syndrome value may.


In some embodiments, the plurality of error correction syndrome values are initialized to logic zero values, and wherein performing the final incremental update of the plurality of error correction syndrome values includes comparing the plurality of error correction syndrome values to a plurality of received CRC words. Alternatively, the plurality of error correction syndrome values are initialized according to a plurality of received CRC words prior to generating the incremental updates of the plurality of error correction syndrome values.


In some embodiments, the symbol position index is determined by forming a binary reciprocal of the first error correction syndrome value, and forming a modulo-reduced multiplication with a second error correction syndrome value of the plurality of error correction syndrome values. In some embodiments, the binary reciprocal is formed using a lookup table (LUT), such as the LUT of Appendix C.


In some embodiments, the first error correction syndrome value is updated by performing a logical XOR function on bits of the sequential sets of data bits sharing a common bit position.


In some embodiments, the selected set of data bits is altered by performing a bit-wise XOR of the selected set of data bits with the bit error mask to create a corrected set of data bits. In some embodiments, the sequential sets of data bits are stored in a first register, and wherein the bit error mask is stored in a second register, and wherein the corrected set of data bits are stored in a third register. In such embodiments, the symbol position index may identify a location in the second register to store the bit error mask.


As will be well understood by one familiar with the art, the methods used to buffer and reformat data in transmitter and receiver may utilize a variety of known art methods, including storage in random access memory, in a collection of data latches, or FIFO buffer elements. Conversion between data words and transmission-unit-sized bit groups may be facilitated by digital multiplexors, shift registers or barrel shifters, or dual-ported memory structures, either as stand-alone elements or integrated with the aforementioned storage elements. As previously mentioned, data path widths described in the above examples are based on the descriptive example offered without limitation of CNRZ-5 transport, with other data path widths and transport media being equally applicable. Similarly, an example set of four processing phases was used without implying limitation for both transmitter and receiver; other embodiments may utilize more or fewer processing instances without limit, including a single instance.


Appendix A—Incremental Computation of r0, r1

One embodiment of the computation of r0 and r1 may be performed by execution of the following sequence of operations, which are organized such that consecutive elements of the transmitted data stream may be processed in transmit order and grouping, with the processing delay of those operations pipelined or overlapped with transmission.


In the descriptive notation below, r0[i] is bit i of r0, similarly r1[i] is bit i of r1. The notational sequence inp[ ] represents the input data being processed, wherein inp[0 . . . 4] are the bits of m0, inp[5 . . . 9] are the bits of m1, . . . , inp[145 . . . 149] are the bits of m29.⊕ denotes the Boolean XOR operator.

r0=0;
r1=0;
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[6];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[0];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[0];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[7];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[7];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[1];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[7];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[1];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[7];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[2];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[8];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[2];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[8];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[3];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[9];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[3];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[9];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[4];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[4];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[10];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[10];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[5];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[10];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[5];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[10];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[5];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[10];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[5];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[11];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[6];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[11];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[6];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[11];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[6];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[11];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[6];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[12];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[22];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[12];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[22];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[12];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[22];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[22];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[13];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[13];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[23];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[13];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[23];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[23];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[14];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[14];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[24];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[14];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[24];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[24];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[15];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[15];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[25];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[15];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[25];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[15];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[25];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[15];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[25];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[16];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[26];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[16];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[26];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[26];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[17];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[26];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[17];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[17];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[27];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[27];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[18];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[27];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[18];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[27];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[18];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[27];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[18];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[27];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[19];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[28];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[19];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[28];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[28];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[20];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[20];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[29];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[20];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[29];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[20];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[29];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[21];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[30];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[21];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[30];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[21];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[30];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[31];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[40];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[31];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[40];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[31];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[40];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[40];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[32];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[32];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[41];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[32];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[41];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[32];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[41];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[32];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[42];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[33];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[42];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[33];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[42];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[42];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[34];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[34];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[43];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[34];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[43];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[34];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[43];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[43];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[35];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[35];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[44];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[35];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[44];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[44];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[36];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[44];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[36];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[44];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[36];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[36];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[45];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[45];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[37];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[37];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[46];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[37];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[46];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[37];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[46];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[37];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[46];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[38];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[47];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[38];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[47];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[38];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[48];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[39];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[48];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[39];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[48];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[39];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[48];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[39];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[49];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[49];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[57];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[49];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[58];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[50];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[58];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[50];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[58];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[50];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[58];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[58];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[51];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[58];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[51];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[51];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[59];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[51];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[59];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[51];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[59];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[52];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[60];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[52];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[60];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[52];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[61];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[53];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[61];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[53];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[61];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[53];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[61];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[53];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[53];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[62];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[62];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[54];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[62];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[54];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[62];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[54];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[54];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[63];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[63];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[55];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[63];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[55];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[63];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[55];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[63];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[56];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[64];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[56];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[64];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[56];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[64];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[56];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[64];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[56];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[65];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[57];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[65];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[57];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[65];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[57];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[65];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[57];
r1 [3]=r[3]⊕inp[65];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[65];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[75];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[75];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[66];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[75];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[66];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[66];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[76];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[76];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[67];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[76];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[67];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[76];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[76];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[68];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[68];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[77];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[68];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[77];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[68];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[77];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[68];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[77];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[69];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[78];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[69];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[78];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[78];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[70];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[78];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[70];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[78];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[70];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[70];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[79];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[70];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[79];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[79];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[71];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[71];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[80];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[71];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[80];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[71];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[80];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[80];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[72];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[72];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[81];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[72];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[81];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[81];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[73];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[81];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[73];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[81];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[73];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[81];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[73];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[82];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[74];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[82];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[74];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[82];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[74];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[82];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[82];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[92];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[83];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[83];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[93];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[83];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[93];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[83];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[93];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[84];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[94];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[84];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[94];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[94];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[85];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[85];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[95];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[95];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[86];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[95];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[86];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[95];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[86];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[95];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[87];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[96];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[87];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[96];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[87];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[96];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[87];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[96];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[87];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[97];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[88];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[97];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[88];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[88];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[98];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[88];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[98];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[89];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[99];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[89];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[99];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[89];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[99];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[89];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[99];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[90];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[100];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[90];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[100];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[90];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[100];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[100];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[91];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[91];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[101];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[101];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[92];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[101];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[92];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[101];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[92];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[101];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[111];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[102];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[111];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[102];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[102];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[112];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[112];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[103];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[103];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[113];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[103];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[113];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[113];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[104];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[113];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[104];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[104];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[114];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[114];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[105];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[114];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[105];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[114];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[105];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[105];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[115];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[115];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[106];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[115];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[106];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[106];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[116];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[106];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[116];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[116];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[107];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[116];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[107];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[107];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[117];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[117];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[108];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[117];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[108];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[117];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[108];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[118];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[109];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[118];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[109];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[118];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[109];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[118];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[109];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[118];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[109];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[119];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[110];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[119];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[110];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[119];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[110];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[119];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[119];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[111];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[119];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[129];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[120];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[129];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[120];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[129];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[120];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[120];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[130];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[130];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[121];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[130];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[121];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[121];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[131];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[131];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[122];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[131];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[122];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[122];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[132];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[132];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[123];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[132];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[123];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[132];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[123];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[123];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[133];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[133];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[124];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[133];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[124];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[124];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[134];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[124];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[134];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[124];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[134];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[134];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[125];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[125];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[135];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[135];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[126];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[135];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[126];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[135];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[135];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[127];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[127];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[136];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[127];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[136];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[136];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[128];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[128];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[137];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[128];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[137];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[128];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[137];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[137];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[129];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[129];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[138];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[138];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[144];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[144];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[139];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[144];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[139];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[139];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[145];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[139];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[145];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[139];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[145];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[145];
r0 [0]=r0 [0]⊕inp[140];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[140];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[146];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[140];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[146];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[140];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[146];
r0 [1]=r0 [1]⊕inp[141];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[147];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[141];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[147];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[147];
r0 [2]=r0 [2]⊕inp[142];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[142];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[148];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[142];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[148];
r1 [2]=r1 [2]⊕inp[148];
r0 [3]=r0 [3]⊕inp[143];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[143];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[149];
r1 [3]=r1 [3]⊕inp[143];
r1 [0]=r1 [0]⊕inp[149];
r1 [1]=r1 [1]⊕inp[149];
r0 [4]=r0 [4]⊕inp[144];
r1 [4]=r1 [4]⊕inp[149];


Appendix B—Error Correction

Given a nonzero element of the finite field GF(32) in its 5-bit representation r0″[0], . . . , r0″[4] and another element r1″[0], . . . , r1″[4], the following procedure computes the bit representation of the element x=r1″/r0″ in GF(32), that is, the bits x[0], . . . , x[4]. In the notation used below, ⊕ denotes the Boolean XOR and & the Boolean AND operator.

x[0]=r0″[0]&r1″[0];
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[0 0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]3(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]®@(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[0]=x[0]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=r0″[0]&r1″[1];
x[1]=x[1]®@(r0″[0]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[1]=x[1]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=r0″[0]&r1″[3];
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[2]=x[2]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=r0″[0]&r1″[1];
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[3]=x[3]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[3]=x[3]®@(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[3]=x[3]⊕(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=r0″[0]&r1″[2];
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[1]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[2]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[2]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]®@(r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[4=[4]⊕(r″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[4]);
x[4=[4]⊕(r″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[4=[4]⊕(r″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[4=[4]⊕(r″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[2]&r0″[4]&r1″[4]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[1]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[3]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[0]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[2]);
x[4]=x[4]⊕(r0″[0]&r0″[2]&r0″[3]&r0″[4]&r1″[1]);












Appendix C - Inverse Lookup Table










r0″
1/r0″






00000
00000



00001
00001



00010
10010



00011
11100



00100
01001



00101
10111



00110
01110



00111
01100



01000
10110



01001
00100



01010
11001



01011
10000



01100
00111



01101
01111



01110
00110



01111
01101



10000
01011



10001
11000



10010
00010



10011
11101



10100
11110



10101
11010



10110
01000



10111
00101



11000
10001



11001
01010



11010
10101



11011
11111



11100
00011



11101
10011



11110
10100



11111
11011








Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: sequentially receiving a plurality of data symbols, and storing each data symbol as a set of bits in a corresponding deserialization buffer location defined by a unique symbol position index;generating a first syndrome value from a first pair of multi-bit check words generated by performing bitwise XOR operations on the plurality of data symbols, the first syndrome value corresponding to a bit-error mask of a data symbol having an error;generating a second syndrome value from a second pair multi-bit check words generated by performing bitwise XOR operations on modulo-multiplied data symbols, each data symbol modulo-multiplied by the unique symbol position index, the second syndrome value corresponding to a modulo-multiplication of the bit-error mask with the unique symbol position index of the data symbol having the error;calculating the symbol position index of the data symbol having the error by dividing the second syndrome value by the bit-error mask; andgenerating a corrected set of output bits by applying the bit-error mask to the stored set of bits in the deserialization buffer location identified by the symbol position index of the data symbol having the error.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each syndrome value comprises n bits, and wherein the plurality of data symbols comprises 2n−2 data symbols.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data symbols are orthogonal differential vector signaling (ODVS) codewords of an ODVS code, and wherein generating each set of output bits comprises decoding the ODVS codewords.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein dividing the second syndrome value by the bit-error mask comprises forming a binary reciprocal of the bit-error mask, and modulo-multiplying the binary reciprocal of the bit-error mask by the second syndrome value.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the binary reciprocal of the bit-error mask is obtained from a lookup table.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second pairs of multi-bit check words each comprise a local multi-bit check word generated from the received plurality of data symbols.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the local multi-bit check words are incrementally updated responsive to each received plurality of data symbols.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the first and second pairs of multi-bit check words each comprise a received multi-bit check word generated from a plurality of transmitted data symbols.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the first syndrome value is generated by comparing the local and received multi-bit check words of the first pair of multi-bit check words, and wherein the second syndrome value is generated by comparing the local and received multi-bit check words of the second pair of multi-bit check words.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the bit-error mask to the set of output bits in the deserialization buffer location comprises performing a bit-wise XOR of the set of output bits in the deserialized buffer location with the bit-error mask to generate the corrected set of output bits.
  • 11. An apparatus comprising: a deserialization buffer configured to sequentially receive a plurality of data symbols, and to store each data symbol as a set of bits in a corresponding deserialization buffer location defined by a unique symbol position index;a forward error correction (FEC) circuit configured to: generate a first syndrome value from a first pair of multi-bit check words generated by performing bitwise XOR operations on the plurality of data symbols, the first syndrome value corresponding to a bit-error mask of a data symbol having an error;generate a second syndrome value from a second pair multi-bit check words generated by performing bitwise XOR operations on modulo-multiplied data symbols, each data symbol modulo-multiplied by the unique symbol position index, the second syndrome value corresponding to a modulo-multiplication of the bit-error mask with the unique symbol position index of the data symbol having the error; andcalculate the symbol position index of the data symbol having the error by dividing the second syndrome value by the bit-error mask; andthe deserialization buffer configured to generate a corrected set of output bits by applying the bit-error mask to the stored set of bits in the deserialization buffer location identified by the symbol position index of the data symbol having the error.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein each syndrome value comprises n bits, and wherein the plurality of data symbols comprises 2n−2 data symbols.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the plurality of data symbols are orthogonal differential vector signaling (ODVS) codewords of an ODVS code, and wherein the apparatus further comprises a plurality of multi-input comparators (MICs) configured to generate each set of output bits by decoding the ODVS codewords.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the FEC circuit is configured to divide the second syndrome value by the bit-error mask by forming a binary reciprocal of the bit-error mask, and modulo-multiplying the binary reciprocal of the bit-error mask by the second syndrome value.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the FEC comprises a lookup table configured to receive the bit-error mask and to output the binary reciprocal of the bit-error mask.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the first and second pairs of multi-bit check words each comprise a local multi-bit check word generated from the received plurality of data symbols.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the FEC circuit is configured to incrementally update the local multi-bit check words responsive to each received data symbol of the plurality of data symbols.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the first and second pairs of multi-bit check words each comprise a received multi-bit check word generated from a plurality of transmitted data symbols.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the FEC circuit is configured to generate the first syndrome value by comparing the local and received multi-bit check words of the first pair of multi-bit check words, and to generate the second syndrome value by comparing the local and received multi-bit check words of the second pair of multi-bit check words.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the deserialization buffer is configured to apply the bit-error mask to the set of output bits in the deserialization buffer location by performing a bit-wise XOR of the set of output bits in the deserialized buffer location with the bit-error mask to generate the corrected set of output bits.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/883,763, entitled “Pipelined Forward Error Correction for Vector Signaling Code Channel,” filed May 26, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/954,138, entitled “Pipelined Forward Error Correction for Vector Signaling Code Channel,” filed Apr. 16, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,666,297 granted May 26, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/485,677, entitled “Pipelined Forward Error Correction for Vector Signaling Code Channel,” filed Apr. 14, 2017, all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (292)
Number Name Date Kind
3196351 David Jul 1965 A
3629824 Bossen Dec 1971 A
3965418 Bauer et al. Jun 1976 A
3970795 Allen Jul 1976 A
4112264 Abramson et al. Sep 1978 A
4163258 Ebihara et al. Jul 1979 A
4486739 Franaszek et al. Dec 1984 A
4499550 Ray et al. Feb 1985 A
4772845 Scott Sep 1988 A
4864303 Ofek Sep 1989 A
5053974 Penz Oct 1991 A
5166956 Baltus et al. Nov 1992 A
5168509 Nakamura et al. Dec 1992 A
5311516 Kuznicki et al. May 1994 A
5331320 Cideciyan et al. Jul 1994 A
5412689 Chan et al. May 1995 A
5449895 Hecht et al. Sep 1995 A
5553097 Dagher Sep 1996 A
5566193 Cloonan Oct 1996 A
5825808 Hershey et al. Oct 1998 A
5856935 Moy et al. Jan 1999 A
5875202 Venters et al. Feb 1999 A
5881130 Zhang Mar 1999 A
5982954 Delen et al. Nov 1999 A
6005895 Perino et al. Dec 1999 A
6084883 Norrell et al. Jul 2000 A
6084958 Blossom Jul 2000 A
6097732 Jung Aug 2000 A
6111895 Miller et al. Aug 2000 A
6119263 Mowbray et al. Sep 2000 A
6128330 Schilling Oct 2000 A
6154498 Dabral et al. Nov 2000 A
6175230 Hamblin et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188497 Franck et al. Feb 2001 B1
6226330 Mansur May 2001 B1
6278740 Nordyke Aug 2001 B1
6317465 Akamatsu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6359931 Perino et al. Mar 2002 B1
6404820 Postol Jun 2002 B1
6452420 Wong Sep 2002 B1
6473877 Sharma Oct 2002 B1
6483828 Balachandran et al. Nov 2002 B1
6504875 Perino et al. Jan 2003 B2
6556628 Poulton et al. Apr 2003 B1
6621427 Greenstreet Sep 2003 B2
6621945 Bissessur Sep 2003 B2
6650638 Walker et al. Nov 2003 B1
6661355 Cornelius et al. Dec 2003 B2
6690739 Mui Feb 2004 B1
6766342 Kechriotis Jul 2004 B2
6865234 Agazzi Mar 2005 B1
6865236 Terry Mar 2005 B1
6876317 Sankaran Apr 2005 B2
6898724 Chang May 2005 B2
6954492 Williams Oct 2005 B1
6963622 Eroz et al. Nov 2005 B2
6973613 Cypher Dec 2005 B2
6976194 Cypher Dec 2005 B2
6982954 Dhong et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990138 Bejjani et al. Jan 2006 B2
6999516 Rajan Feb 2006 B1
7023817 Kuffner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039136 Olson et al. May 2006 B2
7057546 Secatch et al. Jun 2006 B1
7075996 Simon et al. Jul 2006 B2
7080288 Ferraiolo et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082557 Schauer et al. Jul 2006 B2
7127003 Rajan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142612 Horowitz et al. Nov 2006 B2
7167523 Mansur Jan 2007 B2
7180949 Kleveland et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184483 Rajan Feb 2007 B2
7231558 Gentieu et al. Jun 2007 B2
7269130 Pitio Sep 2007 B2
7269212 Chau et al. Sep 2007 B1
7335976 Chen et al. Feb 2008 B2
7346819 Bansal et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356213 Cunningham et al. Apr 2008 B1
7358869 Chiarulli et al. Apr 2008 B1
7362130 Broyde et al. Apr 2008 B2
7362697 Becker et al. Apr 2008 B2
7370264 Worley et al. May 2008 B2
7496130 Rumney Feb 2009 B2
7633850 Ahn Dec 2009 B2
7643588 Visalli et al. Jan 2010 B2
7656321 Wang Feb 2010 B2
7694204 Schmidt et al. Apr 2010 B2
7698088 Sul et al. Apr 2010 B2
7706456 Laroia et al. Apr 2010 B2
7734191 Welch et al. Jun 2010 B1
7746764 Rawlins et al. Jun 2010 B2
7868790 Bae Jan 2011 B2
7869546 Tsai Jan 2011 B2
7882413 Chen et al. Feb 2011 B2
7899653 Hollis Mar 2011 B2
7933770 Krueger et al. Apr 2011 B2
8050332 Chung et al. Nov 2011 B2
8055095 Palotai et al. Nov 2011 B2
8091006 Prasad et al. Jan 2012 B2
8149906 Saito et al. Apr 2012 B2
8159375 Abbasfar Apr 2012 B2
8159376 Abbasfar Apr 2012 B2
8185807 Oh et al. May 2012 B2
8199849 Oh et al. Jun 2012 B2
8199863 Chen et al. Jun 2012 B2
8209580 Varnica et al. Jun 2012 B1
8218670 Abou Jul 2012 B2
8233544 Bao et al. Jul 2012 B2
8245094 Jiang et al. Aug 2012 B2
8245102 Cory et al. Aug 2012 B1
3279957 Tsai et al. Oct 2012 A1
8279094 Abbasfar Oct 2012 B2
8279745 Dent Oct 2012 B2
8279976 Lin et al. Oct 2012 B2
8284848 Nam et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289914 Li et al. Oct 2012 B2
8295250 Gorokhov et al. Oct 2012 B2
8341492 Shen et al. Dec 2012 B2
8365035 Hara Jan 2013 B2
8429492 Yoon et al. Apr 2013 B2
8429495 Przybylski Apr 2013 B2
8462891 Kizer et al. Jun 2013 B2
8472513 Malipatil et al. Jun 2013 B2
8498368 Husted et al. Jul 2013 B1
8520493 Goulahsen Aug 2013 B2
8521020 Welch et al. Aug 2013 B2
8539318 Shokrollahi et al. Sep 2013 B2
8577284 Seo et al. Nov 2013 B2
8578246 Mittelholzer et al. Nov 2013 B2
8588254 Diab et al. Nov 2013 B2
8588280 Oh et al. Nov 2013 B2
8593305 Tajalli et al. Nov 2013 B1
8601340 Farhoodfar et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620166 Guha Dec 2013 B2
8644497 Clausen et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649445 Cronie et al. Feb 2014 B2
8687968 Nosaka et al. Apr 2014 B2
8693570 Wang et al. Apr 2014 B2
8711919 Kumar Apr 2014 B2
8718184 Cronie et al. May 2014 B1
8731039 Sarrigeorgidis et al. May 2014 B1
8755426 Cronie et al. Jun 2014 B1
8773964 Hsueh et al. Jul 2014 B2
8775892 Zhang et al. Jul 2014 B2
8780687 Clausen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8831440 Yu et al. Sep 2014 B2
8879660 Peng et al. Nov 2014 B1
8938171 Tang et al. Jan 2015 B2
8949693 Ordentlich et al. Feb 2015 B2
8989317 Holden et al. Mar 2015 B1
8996740 Wiley et al. Mar 2015 B2
9015566 Cronie et al. Apr 2015 B2
9071476 Fox et al. Jun 2015 B2
9077386 Holden et al. Jul 2015 B1
9100232 Hormati et al. Aug 2015 B1
9152495 Losh et al. Oct 2015 B2
9172412 Kim et al. Oct 2015 B2
9178536 Lee et al. Nov 2015 B2
9183085 Northcott Nov 2015 B1
9197470 Okunev Nov 2015 B2
9246713 Shokrollahi Jan 2016 B2
9251873 Fox et al. Feb 2016 B1
9288082 Ulrich et al. Mar 2016 B1
9288089 Cronie et al. Mar 2016 B2
9300503 Holden et al. Mar 2016 B1
9331962 Lida et al. May 2016 B2
9362974 Fox et al. Jun 2016 B2
9363114 Shokrollahi et al. Jun 2016 B2
9385755 Petrov Jul 2016 B2
9401828 Cronie et al. Jul 2016 B2
9432082 Ulrich et al. Aug 2016 B2
9444654 Hormati et al. Sep 2016 B2
9450612 Hu et al. Sep 2016 B2
9455744 George et al. Sep 2016 B2
9461862 Holden et al. Oct 2016 B2
9479369 Shokrollahi Oct 2016 B1
9509437 Shokrollahi Nov 2016 B2
9537644 Jones et al. Jan 2017 B2
9564926 Farhoodfar et al. Feb 2017 B2
9608669 Song Mar 2017 B2
9634797 Benammar et al. Apr 2017 B2
9667379 Cronie et al. May 2017 B2
9710412 Sengoku Jul 2017 B2
9852806 Stauffer et al. Dec 2017 B2
10055372 Shokrollahi Aug 2018 B2
10396819 Myung et al. Aug 2019 B1
10873373 Suh et al. Dec 2020 B2
20010000219 Agazzi et al. Apr 2001 A1
20010006538 Simon et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010055294 Motoyoshi Dec 2001 A1
20020044316 Myers Apr 2002 A1
20020152340 Dreps et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154633 Shin et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163881 Dhong et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174373 Chang Nov 2002 A1
20020181607 Izumi Dec 2002 A1
20030016770 Trans et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030086366 Branlund et al. May 2003 A1
20030087634 Raghavan et al. May 2003 A1
20030185310 Ketchum et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040057525 Rajan et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040146117 Subramaniam et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040155802 Lamy et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040161019 Raghavan et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040239374 Hori Dec 2004 A1
20050213686 Love et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060013331 Choi et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060056538 Nam et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060126751 Bessios Jun 2006 A1
20060159005 Rawlins et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060245757 Elahmadi et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060251421 Arnon Nov 2006 A1
20060291571 Divsalar et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060291589 Eliezer et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070030796 Green Feb 2007 A1
20070070967 Yang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070076871 Renes Apr 2007 A1
20070204205 Niu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070283210 Prasad et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080016432 Lablans Jan 2008 A1
20080043677 Kim et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080104374 Mohamed May 2008 A1
20080192621 Suehiro Aug 2008 A1
20080316070 Van Acht et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090046009 Fujii Feb 2009 A1
20090059782 Cole Mar 2009 A1
20090110106 Wornell et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090141827 Saito et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150754 Dohmen et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090154604 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090316730 Feng et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100046644 Mazet Feb 2010 A1
20100054355 Kinjo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100081451 Mueck et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100146363 Birru et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100215112 Tsai et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100235673 Abbasfar Sep 2010 A1
20100287438 Lakkis Nov 2010 A1
20100296556 Rave et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100309964 Oh et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014865 Seo et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110018749 Muto et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110051854 Kizer et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110072330 Kolze Mar 2011 A1
20110122767 Dent May 2011 A1
20110134678 Sato et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110235501 Goulahsen Sep 2011 A1
20110268225 Cronie et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110286497 Nervig Nov 2011 A1
20110299555 Cronie et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302478 Cronie et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120036415 Shafrir et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120213299 Cronie et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120257683 Schwager et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120272117 Stadelmeier et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130010892 Cronie et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013870 Cronie et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130114392 Sun et al. May 2013 A1
20130202001 Zhang Aug 2013 A1
20130259113 Kumar Oct 2013 A1
20130315264 Srinivasa et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130315501 Atanassov et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130346830 Ordentlich et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140006649 Wiley et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140068385 Zhang et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140068391 Goel Mar 2014 A1
20140079394 Xie et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140177645 Cronie et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140254642 Fox et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150070201 Dedic et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150078479 Whitby-Strevens Mar 2015 A1
20150092532 Shokrollahi et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150222458 Hormati et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150236885 Ling et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150249559 Shokrollahi et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150333940 Shokrollahi Nov 2015 A1
20150349835 Fox et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150365263 Zhang et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150380087 Mittelholzer et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150381315 Thomson et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150381768 Fox et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160020796 Hormati et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160020824 Ulrich et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160036616 Holden et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160119118 Shokrollahi et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160218894 Fox et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160338040 Lee et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160380787 Hormati et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170272285 Shokrollahi et al. Sep 2017 A1
20190103903 Yang Apr 2019 A1
20200321778 Gharibdoust et al. Oct 2020 A1
20210297292 Hormati Sep 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
1671092 Sep 2005 CN
1864346 Nov 2006 CN
101854223 Oct 2010 CN
101820288 Jan 2013 CN
1926267 May 2008 EP
2003163612 Jun 2003 JP
4394755 Oct 2009 JP
2005002162 Jan 2005 WO
2005032000 Apr 2005 WO
2009084121 Jul 2009 WO
2010031824 Mar 2010 WO
2019241081 Dec 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
Abbasfar, Aliazam , “Generalized Differential Vector Signaling”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC '09, Jun. 14, 2009, 1-5 (5 pages).
Anonymous , “Constant-weight code”, Wikipedia.org, retrieved on Feb. 6, 2017, (3 pages).
Belogolovy, A. , et al., “Forward Error Correction for 10GBASE-KR PHY”, IEEE 802.3ap-00/0000r4, Nov. 2005, 1-13 (13 pagges.
Ben-Neticha, Zouhair , et al., “The “Stretched”-Golay and Other Codes for High-SNR Finite-Delay Quantization of the Gaussian Source at 1/2 Bit Per Sample”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, New York, US, vol. 38, No. 12, XP000203339, Dec. 1990, 2089-2093 (5 pages).
Burr, A.G. , “Spherical Codes for M-ARY Code Shift Keying”, Second IEE National Conference on Telecommunications, University of York, UK, Apr. 2, 1989, 67-72 (6 pages).
Counts, Lew , et al., “One-Chip “Slide Rule” Works with Logs, Antilogs for Real-Time Processing”, Analog Devices, Computational Products 6, Reprinted from Electronic Design, May 2, 1985, 3-9 (7 pages).
Dasilva, Victor , et al., “Multicarrier Orthogonal CDMA Signals for Quasi-Synchronous Communication Systems”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, No. 5, Jun. 1994, 842-852 (11 pages).
Ericson, Thomas , et al., “Spherical Codes Generated by Binary Partitions of Symmetric Pointsets”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, No. 1, Jan. 1995, 107-129 (23 pages).
Farzan, Kamran , et al., “Coding Schemes for Chip-to-Chip Interconnect Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, Apr. 2006, 393-406 (14 pages).
Giovaneli, Carlos Lopez, et al., “Space-Frequency Coded OFDM System for Multi-Wire Power Line Communications”, Power Line Communications and Its Applications, 2005 International Symposium on Vancouver, BC, Canada, IEEE XP-002433844, Apr. 6-8, 2005, 191-195 (5 pages).
Healey, Adam , et al., “A Comparison of 25 Gbps NRZ & PAM-4 Modulation used in Legacy & Premium Backplane Channels”, Tyco Electronics Corporation, DesignCon 2012, Jan. 2012, 1-16 (16 pages).
Holden, Brian , “An exploration of the technical feasibility of the major technology options for 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, Geneva, CH, Jul. 16, 2013, 1-18 (18 pages).
Holden, Brian , “Simulation results for NRZ, ENRZ & PAM-4 on 16-wire full-sized 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, York, UK, Sep. 2, 2013, 1-19 (19 pages).
Holden, Brian , “Using Ensemble NRZ Coding for 400GE Electrical Interfaces”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, May 17, 2013, 1-24 (24 pages).
Jiang, Anxiao , et al., “Rank Modulation for Flash Memories”, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, vol. 55, No. 6, Jun. 2009, 2659-2673 (16 pages).
Oh, Dan , et al., “Pseudo-Differential Vector Signaling for Noise Reduction in Single-Ended Signaling Systems”, DesignCon 2009, Rambus Inc., Jan. 2009, (22 pages).
Penttinen, Jyrki , et al., “Performance Model for Orthogonal Sub Channel in Noise-limited Environment”, Sixth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications, 2010, 56-61 (6 pages).
Poulton, John , “Multiwire Differential Signaling”, UNC-CH Department of Computer Science Version 1.1, Aug. 6, 2003, 1-20 (20 pages).
She, James , et al., “A Framework of Cross-Layer Superposition Coded Multicast for Robust IPTV Services over WiMAX”, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Apr. 15, 2008, 3139-3144 (6 pages).
Skliar, Osvaldo , et al., “A Method For the Analysis of Signals: the Square-Wave Method”, Revista de Matematica: Teoria y Aplicationes, vol. 15, No. 2, Mar. 2008, 109-129 (21 pages).
Slepian, David , “Permutation Modulation”, Proceedings of the IEE, vol. 53, No. 3, Mar. 1965, 228-236 (9 pages).
Wada, Tadahiro , et al., “A Study on Orthogonal Multi-Code CDMA Systems Using Constant Amplitude Coding”, Technical Report of IEICE, vol. 97, No. 132, Jun. 24, 1997, 19-24 (6 pages).
Wang, Xin , et al., “Applying CDMA Technique to Network-on-Chip”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 15, No. 10, Oct. 1, 2007, 1091-1100 (10 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220286145 A1 Sep 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62485677 Apr 2017 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16883763 May 2020 US
Child 17746778 US
Parent 15954138 Apr 2018 US
Child 16883763 US