Pipelined systolic finite impulse response filter

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9379687
  • Patent Number
    9,379,687
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 28, 2014
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 28, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
A systolic FIR filter circuit includes a plurality of multipliers, a plurality of sample pre-adders, each respective one of the sample pre-adders connected to a sample input of a respective multiplier, and an output cascade adder chain including a respective output adder connected to a respective multiplier. The output cascade adder chain includes a selectable number of delays between adjacent output adders. An input sample chain has a first leg and a second leg. Each respective one of the sample pre-adders receives a respective input from the first leg and a respective input from the second leg. The input sample chain has, between adjacent sample points in at least one of the legs, a selectable number of sample delays related to the selectable number of output delays. Connections of inputs from the input sample chain to the sample pre-adders are adjusted to account for the selectable number.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to implementation of a pipelined systolic finite impulse response (FIR) filter, and particularly to implementation of such a filter as a variable-latency filter in an integrated circuit device, especially a programmable integrated circuit device.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Symmetrical FIR filters have a sample chain with forward and reverse branches. For each filter tap, samples from both branches are combined (e.g., added together). Proper operation of the filter depends on known delay relationships between the samples in the branches of the sample chain. If the circuit is pipelined in order to increase the operating frequency of the device on which the circuit is implemented, the introduction of pipeline registers in the sample chain can affect those delay relationships.


The potential impact of pipelining may be felt in a fixed device such as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) device, but may be felt even more acutely in a programmable integrated circuit device such as a programmable logic device (PLD), of which field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) are one type, because there frequently is a greater need in such devices for deeper pipelining to meet the operating frequency (Fmax) requirements of such devices.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the sample path of a systolic FIR filter is adjusted along with the delays introduced by pipelining to maintain the correct sample relationships even in a pipelined implementation of a systolic FIR filter.


In accordance with some embodiments, the connection pattern of the sample path is altered to account for delays introduced by pipelining. Such embodiments are particularly suited to a filter circuit implemented in an ASIC or other fixed device.


In accordance with other embodiments, both branches of the sample path run in the same direction, with the sample signal injection point located accordingly, and delays are implemented using addressable memories, such as FIFO memories, where addressing is used to maintain correct sample relationships, accounting for pipelining and other delays.


Therefore, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention there is provided a systolic FIR filter circuit including a plurality of multipliers, each respective one of the multipliers having a respective coefficient input, a respective sample input, and a respective multiplier output, a plurality of sample pre-adders, each respective one of the sample pre-adders connected to a sample input of a respective one of the multipliers, and an output cascade adder chain including a respective output adder connected to each respective one of the multipliers, each respective output adder having a first input receiving the respective multiplier output, and, except for a first output adder in the output cascade adder chain, having a second input receiving an output of a previous one of the output adders. The output cascade adder chain further includes a selectable number of output delays between adjacent ones of the output adders. An input sample chain has a first leg and a second leg. Each respective one of the sample pre-adders receives a respective input from a respective sample point in the first leg and a respective input from a respective sample point in the second leg. The second leg has, between adjacent sample points, a selectable number of sample delays related to the selectable number of output delays. Connections of inputs from the input sample chain to the sample pre-adders are adjusted to account for the selectable number.


There is also provided a systolic FIR filter circuit including an input sample chain having a first leg and a second leg. The filter has a plurality of taps, each of the taps combining a sample from a respective sample point in the first leg and a sample from a respective sample point in the second leg. The input sample chain has an input at a point common to both legs. For each of the taps, the respective sample point in the first leg and the respective sample point in the second leg are separated from the common point by an identical number of sample points.


A programmable integrated circuit device configured as such a filter, and a method of configuring a programmable integrated circuit device as such a filter, are also provided.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:



FIG. 1 shows an example of a known four-tap even-symmetric FIR filter;



FIG. 2 shows the result of attempting to add one systolic delay between each pair of adjacent adders in the output cascade chain of the filter of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 shows one solution according to one embodiment of the present invention for the problem illustrated in FIG. 2;



FIG. 4 shows the result of attempting to add two systolic delays between each pair of adjacent adders in the output cascade chain of the filter of FIG. 1;



FIG. 5 shows one solution according to a second embodiment of the present invention for the problem illustrated in FIG. 4;



FIG. 6 shows the result of attempting to add three systolic delays between each pair of adjacent adders in the output cascade chain of the filter of FIG. 1;



FIG. 7 shows one solution according to a third embodiment of the present invention for the problem illustrated in FIG. 6;



FIG. 8 shows a fourth embodiment of the present invention in which both legs of the input sample chain flow in the same direction;



FIG. 9 shows a first particular implementation of the embodiment of FIG. 8;



FIG. 10 shows a second particular implementation of the embodiment of FIG. 8;



FIG. 11 shows a third particular implementation of the embodiment of FIG. 8;



FIG. 12 shows an implementation of one tap of a filter according to the present invention;



FIG. 13 is a simplified block diagram of an exemplary system employing a programmable logic device incorporating the present invention; and



FIG. 14 is a flow diagram of a method according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 1 shows an example of a basic, known, four-tap even-symmetric FIR filter 100. Samples are input at 111 to sample chain 101, which includes a forward leg or “forward sample chain” 102 and a reverse leg or “reverse sample chain” 103. Each register 104 in sample chain 101 provides a single clock delay. Each tap of filter 100 is the output of one of multipliers 105, which has as inputs a respective stored coefficient 115 (coefficient storage is not shown), and a respective pre-adder which adds together two samples—one from forward sample chain 102 and one from reverse sample chain 103. Cascaded adders 132 from an output adder cascade chain 133 that provides filter output 130. Of course, while four taps are shown in this drawing, the number of taps is arbitrary.


In this example 100, pre-adder 106 adds two samples 121, 131, which are separated by two delays. Pre-adder 107 adds two samples 141, 151, which are separated by four delays. Pre-adder 108 adds two samples 161, 171, which are separated by six delays. Pre-adder 109 adds two samples 181, 191, which are separated by eight delays. These differences 110 in delay (labeled Δ2, Δ4, Δ6, Δ8 in the four-tap example of this drawing, it being understood that the series would continue for delay differences for a greater number of taps) between successive symmetric taps should be consistently applied to provide proper filter function.



FIG. 2 shows the result of attempting to add one systolic delay 201 between each pair of adjacent adders 132 in output cascade chain 133. To maintain timing, corresponding delays 202 are added to input sample chain 101. However, the result is that instead of differences of Δ2, Δ4, Δ6, Δ8 in delay between the between successive symmetric taps, the differences in delay are Δ2, Δ5, Δ8, Δ11. But the Δ2, Δ4, Δ6, Δ8 pattern is required for proper filter function. Thus, while timing is maintained, the filter function is not.



FIG. 3 shows a solution according to one embodiment of the present invention for the problem illustrated in FIG. 2. In filter 300, the input sample chain 301 is rewired so that the samples in forward sample chain 302 reach respective pre-adders 107, 108, 109 later, to account for the added delays 201, 202 in output cascade chain 333 and reverse sample chain 303, thus restoring proper filter function.



FIG. 4 shows the result of attempting to add two systolic delays 401, 402 between each pair of adjacent adders in output cascade chain 133. To maintain timing, corresponding delays 403, 404 are added to input sample chain 101. However, the result is that instead of differences of Δ2, Δ4, Δ6, Δ8 in delay between the pairs of samples at the respective pre-adders, the differences in delay are Δ2, Δ6, Δ10, Δ14. Once again, while timing is maintained, the filter function is not.



FIG. 5 shows a solution according to another embodiment of the present invention for the problem illustrated in FIG. 4. In filter 500, the input sample chain 501 is rewired so that the samples in forward sample chain 502 reach respective pre-adders 107, 108, 109 later, to account for the added delays 401-404 in output cascade chain 533 and reverse sample chain 503, thus restoring proper filter function.



FIG. 6 shows the result of attempting to add three systolic delays 601-603 between each pair of adjacent adders in output cascade chain 133. To maintain timing, corresponding delays 604-606 are added to input sample chain 101. However, the result is that instead of differences in delay of Δ2, Δ4, Δ6, Δ8 between the pairs of samples at the respective pre-adders, the differences in delay are Δ2, Δ7, Δ12, Δ17. Once again, while timing is maintained, the filter function is not.



FIG. 7 shows a solution according to another embodiment of the present invention for the problem illustrated in FIG. 6. In filter 700, the input sample chain 701 is rewired so that the samples in forward sample chain 702 reach respective pre-adders 107, 108, 109 later, to account for the added delays 601-606 in output cascade chain 733 and reverse sample chain 703, thus restoring proper filter function.


Each of the solutions in the embodiments of FIGS. 3, 5 and 7 could be implemented easily in a fixed device such as an ASIC. However, even in fixed devices, it can be seen that the solution becomes increasingly complex as the number of systolic delays increases, with ever greater numbers of conductors used.


Moreover, some of the heaviest uses of FIR filters are in programmable devices such as FPGAs. For example, in radiofrequency applications such as Remote Radio Head applications, FIR filters may constitute the single largest resource use on a device. On such a device, in some implementations, even where digital signal processing (DSP) blocks are provided for implementation of FIR filters, up to 70% of the registers in the device may be used to support FIR functions. On a programmable device, it would be difficult to provide enough optional conductors to allow for any arbitrary systolic filter implementation using custom wiring patterns as in the foregoing embodiments.


Therefore, in accordance with a further embodiment 800, as illustrated in FIG. 8, samples are injected into input sample chain 801 at a common point 811—e.g., in the “center”—between the two legs 802, 803 of sample chain 801. Thus, in this embodiment 800, both legs of the sample chain flow in the same direction, which is right-to-left in this drawing, corresponding to the “reverse” sample chains of the earlier embodiments. However, the designations “forward” and “reverse” have little significance in this embodiment.


Because both legs of the sample chain flow in the same direction, the samples in one leg would require negative delay to maintain the proper relationship between the two legs of the sample chains. Negative delays, while theoretically calculable, are physically unattainable. However, as pipelining is introduced, the positive delays introduced by for pipelining cancel the negative delays. Therefore, as long as the depth of pipelining is sufficient, this structure can function. In fact, the minimum necessary systolic delay is 1, which results in one leg of the sample chain becoming a conductor, with no delays, as shown in FIG. 11, below. The minimum systolic delay that allows both parts of the sample chain to travel in the same direction, with delays, as in FIG. 8, is 2.


To maintain the ability to configure filter 800 arbitrarily, memories 840 are used to implement both the systolic delays and the pipeline registers. By maintaining proper spacing between the write address and the read address, as input at 841, whatever non-negative delay is desired can be implemented. Memories 840 could be random access memory such as is provided in many programmable integrated circuit devices, such as in the FPGAs available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif. Alternatively, memories 840 could be shift registers.


In a generalized case, for a single channel, if the total number of delays 831 between adjacent adders 832 in the adder chain 833 (including both systolic delays and pipeline delays) is N, then the number of delays between taps in one leg of the sample chain is N+a−1, and the number of delays between taps in the other leg of the sample chain is N+a+1, where a is any non-negative integer. In the most basic case, a=0, so that if the total number of delays 831 between adjacent adders 832 in the adder chain is N, then the number of delays between taps in one leg of the sample chain is N−1, and the number of delays between taps in the other leg of the sample chain is N+1.


In any case, as noted above, the proper delay is achieved by properly adjusting the read addresses and the write addresses of the FIFO memories 840. For example, if N=1, then we would want 0 delays in the upper leg 802 of sample chain 801, and 2 delays in the lower leg 803 of sample chain 801. In one example of an addressing scheme to achieve that result, the write address sequence would be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . , the read address sequence (assuming a zero-latency memory) for upper leg 802 of sample chain 801 would be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, . . . , and the read address sequence for lower leg 803 of sample chain 801 would be x, x, 0, 1, 2, . . . . However, this is only one example.


This further generalizes in a multichannel case, where the filter is time-shared across multiple channels and the input is an interleaved stream of samples from the different channels (number of channels=Nch) to, if the total number of delays 831 between adjacent adders 832 in the adder chain 833 is N, then the number of delays between taps in one leg of the sample chain is N−Nch, and the number of delays between taps in the other leg of the sample chain is N+Nch, with the depths of the memories adjusted to match the number of channels Nch. For both legs of the sample chain to run in the same direction, N must be greater than Nch. For N=Nch, the top chain would become a conductor as described below in connection with FIG. 11 for a single-channel case, and for N<Nch, the two legs of the sample chain would run in opposite directions as in the single-channel embodiments of FIGS. 1-7.



FIG. 9 shows a single-channel case 900 where the delay 931 between adders 932 in the output cascade adder chain 933 is N, apportioned between 2 pipeline delays and N−2 systolic delays. In this case 900, the delay between taps in the upper leg 902 of sample chain 9001 is N−1, apportioned between 1 pipeline delay and N−2 systolic delays, and the delay between taps in the lower leg 903 of sample chain 901 is N+1, apportioned between 1 pipeline delay and N systolic delays. Although the pipeline delays and the systolic delays are drawn separately in FIG. 9, that distinction is conceptual, and at least in input sample chain 901 (if not in adder chain 932), both the pipeline delays and the systolic delays are implemented using memories 840 with proper addressing 841 as described above.


Similarly, FIG. 10 shows a single-channel case 1000 where the delay 1031 between adders 1032 in the output cascade adder chain 1033 is N, including only 2 pipeline delays and no systolic delays (N=2). In this case 1000, the delay 1012 between taps in the upper leg 1002 of sample chain 1003 is N−1=1, including only 1 pipeline delay, and the delay 1013 between taps in the lower leg 1003 of sample chain 1001 is N+1=3, apportioned between 1 pipeline delay and 2 systolic delays. Although the pipeline delays and the systolic delays are drawn separately in FIG. 10, that distinction is conceptual, and at least in input sample chain 1001 (if not in adder chain 1032), both the pipeline delays and the systolic delays are implemented using memories 840 with proper addressing 841 as described above.



FIG. 11 shows a special single-channel case 1100 where the delay 1131 between adders 1132 in the output cascade adder chain 1133 is N=1. In this case 1100, the delay 1104 between taps in the lower leg 1103 of sample chain 1101 is N+1=2, and the delay between taps in the upper leg 1102 of sample chain 1103 is N−1=0, so the upper leg 1102 of sample chain 1103 collapses to a conductor. This is a particularly efficient case in a programmable device having dedicated DSP blocks that can be used to implement FIR filters, but where some of the filter, such as the memories for the delays, may be outside the DSP blocks. In this case, conductor 1102 can be outside the DSP blocks.



FIG. 12 shows a repeating unit 1200 of a filter implemented in accordance with embodiments of this invention. One or more occurrences of all or part of filter unit 1200 can be implemented in a digital signal processing block, or other specialized processing block, of a programmable device such as an FPGA, incorporating one or more multipliers 1201 along with adders 1204 and memories 1205-1208. Connections 1210 to the preceding and subsequent instances of DSP block 1200 could be direct connections, but also could be made using programmable interconnect resources of the programmable device. Similarly, one or both of sample memories 1205, 1206, as well as conductors 1202, 1203 for the legs of the input sample path, can be either inside DSP block 1200, or in the programmable resources of the programmable device.


It will be apparent that for the first of units 1200 in a filter, samples will be input at 1211 and selected by multiplexers 1212, 1213 instead of selecting the previous DSP block, while multiplexer 1214 will select a ‘0’ input for the output cascade adder chain rather than selecting the output of the previous DSP block. Similarly, for the last of units 1200 in a filter, the output will be taken at 1215, rather than being cascaded at 1233. It will further be apparent that while the input sample chains are shown propagating from right to left in previous drawings, in this drawing the flow is from left to right.


It will be appreciated that because structures as described above include sample chains that need not loop back on themselves, the input and output need not be on the same side of the circuit. The structure can be pipelined by the optimal amount of registers. Moreover, in the case of N=1, as described above, one leg of the sample chain collapses to a conductor, allowing efficient mapping into DSP blocks of a programmable device. And for N>1, the structure allows the building of efficient chains of elements that can be configured into filters, which can be pipelined to arbitrary N to achieve any desired speed.


It should be noted that while the foregoing example implementations are for an even symmetric FIR filter, the present invention also may be used to implement an odd symmetric FIR filter, where the delays between the upper and lower sample chains for the first four taps are Δ1, Δ3, Δ5, Δ7 (and so on for higher taps).


A PLD 140 configured to include a systolic FIR filter according to an implementation of the present invention may be used in many kinds of electronic devices. One possible use is in an exemplary data processing system 1400 shown in FIG. 13. Data processing system 1400 may include one or more of the following components: a processor 1401; memory 1102; I/O circuitry 1403; and peripheral devices 1404. These components are coupled together by a system bus 1405 and are populated on a circuit board 1406 which is contained in an end-user system 1407.


System 1400 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, Remote Radio Head (RRH), or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 140 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 140 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 1401. PLD 140 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 1400. In yet another example, PLD 140 can be configured as an interface between processor 1401 and one of the other components in system 1400. It should be noted that system 1400 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.


Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 140 as described above and incorporating this invention.


One implementation of a method 1500 for configuring a programmable integrated circuit device as a systolic FIR filter circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is diagrammed in FIG. 14. Method 1500 begins at 1501 where a plurality of multipliers are configured. At 1502, a plurality of sample pre-adders are configured, connecting each respective one of the sample pre-adders to a sample input of a respective one of the multipliers. At 1503, an output cascade adder chain is configured, connecting a respective output adder to the respective multiplier output of each respective one of the multipliers, with each respective output adder (except the first) having a second input receiving an output of a previous one of the output adders. At 1504, a selectable number of output delays are configured between adjacent ones of the output adders. At 1505, an input sample chain is configured having a first leg and a second leg, such that each respective one of the sample pre-adders receives a respective input from a respective sample point in the first leg and a respective input from a respective sample point in the second leg. At 1506, a selectable number of sample delays, related to the selectable number of output delays in the input sample chain are configured between adjacent sample points in at least one of the legs, using on-board memories of the programmable integrated circuit device. At 1507, the selectable number of sample delays is adjusted relative to the selectable number of output delays to maintain timing in the systolic FIR filter circuit. At 1508, the results are incorporated into a configuration bitstream, along with other user configuration selections for the programmable device, and the method ends.


Thus it is seen that a systolic FIR filter in which the sample path can be adjusted along with the delays introduced by pipelining to maintain the correct sample relationships even in a pipelined systolic FIR filter has been provided.


It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the various elements of this invention can be provided on a PLD in any desired number and/or arrangement. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A systolic FIR filter circuit comprising: a plurality of multipliers, each respective one of said multipliers having a respective coefficient input, a respective sample input, and a respective multiplier output;a plurality of sample pre-adders, each respective one of said sample pre-adders connected to a sample input of a respective one of said multipliers;an output cascade adder chain comprising a respective output adder connected to a respective multiplier output of each respective one of said multipliers, each respective output adder having a first input receiving said respective multiplier output, and, except for a first output adder in said output cascade adder chain, having a second input receiving an output of a previous one of said output adders, said output cascade adder chain further comprising a selectable number of output delays between adjacent ones of said output adders; andan input sample chain having a first leg and a second leg; wherein:each respective one of said sample pre-adders receives a respective input from a respective sample point in said first leg and a respective input from a respective sample point said second leg;said input sample chain has, between adjacent sample points in at least one of said legs, a selectable number of sample delays related to said selectable number of output delays; andconnections of inputs from said input sample chain to said sample pre-adders are adjusted to account for said selectable number.
  • 2. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 1 wherein said connections are adjusted by varying patterns of wiring from said input sample chain to said sample pre-adders.
  • 3. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 1 wherein said connections are adjusted by varying delays in at least one of said legs.
  • 4. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 3 wherein: said delays comprise memories; andsaid delays are varied by adjusting read addresses relative to write addresses.
  • 5. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 4 wherein: said systolic FIR filter circuit is a multichannel filter circuit having a number of channels; andeach of said memories has a depth equal to said number of channels.
  • 6. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 3 wherein samples are input at a common point of said first leg and said second leg.
  • 7. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 1 wherein samples are input at one end of said first leg.
  • 8. A programmable integrated circuit device configured as a systolic FIR filter circuit, said configured programmable integrated circuit device comprising: a plurality of multipliers, each respective one of said multipliers having a respective coefficient input, a respective sample input, and a respective multiplier output;a plurality of sample pre-adders, each respective one of said sample pre-adders connected to a sample input of a respective one of said multipliers;an output cascade adder chain comprising a respective output adder connected to the respective multiplier output of each respective one of said multipliers, each respective output adder having a first input receiving said respective multiplier output, and, except for a first output adder in said output cascade adder chain, having a second input receiving an output of a previous one of said output adders, said an output cascade adder chain further comprising a selectable number of output delays between adjacent ones of said output adders; andan input sample chain having a first leg and a second leg; wherein:each respective one of said sample pre-adders receives a respective input from a respective sample point in said first leg and a respective input from a respective sample point in said second leg;said input sample chain has, between adjacent sample points in at least one of said legs, a selectable number of sample delays related to said selectable number of output delays;said sample delays are implemented by on-board memories of said programmable integrated circuit device; andsaid selectable number of sample delays are adjusted relative to said selectable number of output delays to maintain timing in said systolic FIR filter circuit.
  • 9. The configured programmable integrated circuit device of claim 8 wherein said selectable number of sample delays are adjusted relative to said selectable number of output delays by adjusting read addresses relative to write addresses.
  • 10. The configured programmable integrated circuit device of claim 8 wherein samples are input at a common point of said first leg and said second leg.
  • 11. The configured programmable integrated circuit device of claim 8 wherein: said systolic FIR filter circuit is a multichannel filter circuit having a number of channels; andeach of said memories has a depth equal to said number of channels.
  • 12. The configured programmable integrated circuit device of claim 8 wherein at least one of (a) said plurality of multipliers, (b) said plurality of pre-adders, and (c) said output cascade adder chain, is implemented in one or more specialized processing blocks on said programmable integrated circuit device.
  • 13. The configured programmable integrated circuit device of claim 12 wherein: said number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said second leg is one more than said number of output delays; andsaid number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said first leg is one less than said number of output delays.
  • 14. The configured programmable integrated circuit device of claim 13 wherein: said number of output delays is 1;said number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said second leg is 2; andsaid first leg is a conductor.
  • 15. The configured programmable integrated circuit device of claim 14 wherein said conductor is outside said one or more specialized processing blocks.
  • 16. A method of configuring a programmable integrated circuit device as a systolic FIR filter circuit, said method comprising: configuring a plurality of multipliers with, each respective one of said multipliers having a respective coefficient input, a respective sample input, and a respective multiplier output;configuring a plurality of sample pre-adders, by connecting each respective one of said sample pre-adders to a sample input of a respective one of said multipliers;configuring an output cascade adder chain by connecting a respective output adder to the respective multiplier output of each respective one of said multipliers, each respective output adder having a first input receiving said respective multiplier output, and, except for a first output adder in said output cascade adder chain, having a second input receiving an output of a previous one of said output adders, and further configuring a selectable number of output delays between adjacent ones of said output adders; andconfiguring an input sample chain having a first leg and a second leg; wherein:each respective one of said sample pre-adders receives a respective input from a respective sample point in said first leg and a respective input from a respective sample point in said second leg; andsaid input sample chain has, between adjacent sample points in at least one of said legs, a selectable number of sample delays related to said selectable number of output delays; said method further comprising:implementing said sample delays using on-board memories of said programmable integrated circuit device; andadjusting said selectable number of sample delays relative to said selectable number of output delays to maintain timing in said systolic FIR filter circuit.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 wherein adjusting comprises adjusting read addresses relative to write addresses.
  • 18. The method of claim 16 further comprising configuring a sample input at a common point of said first leg and said second leg.
  • 19. The method of claim 16 wherein: said systolic FIR filter circuit is a multichannel filter circuit having a number of channels; said method further comprising:configuring each of said memories to have a depth equal to said number of channels.
  • 20. The method of claim 16 comprising implementing at least one of (a) said plurality of multipliers, (b) said plurality of pre-adders, and (c) said output cascade adder chain, in one or more specialized processing blocks on said programmable integrated circuit device.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 further comprising: implementing said number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said second leg as one more than said number of output delays; andimplementing said number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said first leg as one less than said number of output delays.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein: said number of output delays is 1; said method further comprising:implementing said number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said second leg as 2; andimplementing said first leg as a conductor.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein said conductor is outside said one or more specialized processing blocks.
  • 24. A systolic FIR filter circuit comprising: an input sample chain having a first leg and a second leg; anda plurality of taps, wherein for each of said taps, a sample from a respective sample point in said first leg is combined with a sample from a respective sample point in said second leg; wherein:said input sample chain has an input at a point common to both said legs; andfor each of said taps, said respective sample point in said first leg and said respective sample point in said second leg are separated from said common point by an identical number of sample points.
  • 25. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 24 wherein said first leg and said second leg extend parallel to one another.
  • 26. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 24 wherein: outputs of said taps are combined in an output cascade adder chain comprising a respective adder for each of said taps and a selectable number of output delays between each of said adders; andsaid input sample chain has, between adjacent sample points, a selectable number of sample delays related to said selectable number of output delays.
  • 27. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 26 wherein: said number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said second leg is one more than said number of output delays; andsaid number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said first leg is one less than said number of output delays.
  • 28. The systolic FIR filter circuit of claim 27 wherein: said number of output delays is 1;said number of sample delays between adjacent sample points of said second leg is 2; andsaid first leg is a conductor.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This claims the benefit of commonly-assigned U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/927,112, filed Jan. 14, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (235)
Number Name Date Kind
3473160 Wahlstrom Oct 1969 A
4156927 McElroy et al. May 1979 A
4179746 Tubbs Dec 1979 A
4212076 Conners Jul 1980 A
4215406 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4215407 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4422155 Amir et al. Dec 1983 A
4484259 Palmer et al. Nov 1984 A
4521907 Amir et al. Jun 1985 A
4597053 Chamberlin Jun 1986 A
4623961 Mackiewicz Nov 1986 A
4682302 Williams Jul 1987 A
4718057 Venkitakrishnan et al. Jan 1988 A
4727508 Williams Feb 1988 A
4791590 Ku et al. Dec 1988 A
4799004 Mori Jan 1989 A
4823295 Mader Apr 1989 A
4839847 Laprade Jun 1989 A
4871930 Wong et al. Oct 1989 A
4912345 Steele et al. Mar 1990 A
4967160 Quievy et al. Oct 1990 A
4982354 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1991 A
4994997 Martin et al. Feb 1991 A
5122685 Chan et al. Jun 1992 A
5128559 Steele Jul 1992 A
5175702 Beraud et al. Dec 1992 A
5208491 Ebeling et al. May 1993 A
RE34363 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5267187 Hsieh et al. Nov 1993 A
5296759 Sutherland et al. Mar 1994 A
5338983 Agarwala Aug 1994 A
5339264 Said Aug 1994 A
5349250 New Sep 1994 A
5357152 Jennings, III et al. Oct 1994 A
5371422 Patel et al. Dec 1994 A
5381357 Wedgwood et al. Jan 1995 A
5388062 Knutson Feb 1995 A
5404324 Colon-Bonet Apr 1995 A
5424589 Dobbelaere et al. Jun 1995 A
5446651 Moyse et al. Aug 1995 A
5451948 Jekel Sep 1995 A
5452231 Butts et al. Sep 1995 A
5452375 Rousseau et al. Sep 1995 A
5457644 McCollum Oct 1995 A
5465226 Goto Nov 1995 A
5465375 Thepaut et al. Nov 1995 A
5483178 Costello et al. Jan 1996 A
5497498 Taylor Mar 1996 A
5500828 Doddington et al. Mar 1996 A
5523963 Hsieh et al. Jun 1996 A
5528550 Pawate et al. Jun 1996 A
5537601 Kimura et al. Jul 1996 A
5546018 New et al. Aug 1996 A
5550993 Ehlig et al. Aug 1996 A
5559450 Ngai et al. Sep 1996 A
5563526 Hastings et al. Oct 1996 A
5563819 Nelson Oct 1996 A
5570039 Oswald et al. Oct 1996 A
5570040 Lytle et al. Oct 1996 A
5572148 Lytle et al. Nov 1996 A
5581501 Sansbury et al. Dec 1996 A
5590350 Guttag et al. Dec 1996 A
5594366 Khong et al. Jan 1997 A
5594912 Brueckmann et al. Jan 1997 A
5596763 Guttag et al. Jan 1997 A
5606266 Pedersen Feb 1997 A
5617058 Adrian et al. Apr 1997 A
5633601 Nagaraj May 1997 A
5636150 Okamoto Jun 1997 A
5636368 Harrison et al. Jun 1997 A
5640578 Balmer et al. Jun 1997 A
5644522 Moyse et al. Jul 1997 A
5646545 Trimberger et al. Jul 1997 A
5648732 Duncan Jul 1997 A
5652903 Weng et al. Jul 1997 A
5655069 Ogawara et al. Aug 1997 A
5664192 Lloyd et al. Sep 1997 A
5689195 Cliff et al. Nov 1997 A
5696708 Leung Dec 1997 A
5729495 Madurawe Mar 1998 A
5740404 Baji Apr 1998 A
5744980 McGowan et al. Apr 1998 A
5744991 Jefferson et al. Apr 1998 A
5754459 Telikepalli May 1998 A
5761483 Trimberger Jun 1998 A
5764555 McPherson et al. Jun 1998 A
5768613 Asghar Jun 1998 A
5777912 Leung et al. Jul 1998 A
5784636 Rupp Jul 1998 A
5790446 Yu et al. Aug 1998 A
5794067 Kadowaki Aug 1998 A
5801546 Pierce et al. Sep 1998 A
5805477 Perner Sep 1998 A
5805913 Guttag et al. Sep 1998 A
5812479 Cliff et al. Sep 1998 A
5812562 Baeg Sep 1998 A
5815422 Dockser Sep 1998 A
5821776 McGowan Oct 1998 A
5825202 Tavana et al. Oct 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5841684 Dockser Nov 1998 A
5847579 Trimberger Dec 1998 A
5859878 Phillips et al. Jan 1999 A
5869979 Bocchino Feb 1999 A
5872380 Rostoker et al. Feb 1999 A
5874834 New Feb 1999 A
5878250 LeBlanc Mar 1999 A
5880981 Kojima et al. Mar 1999 A
5892962 Cloutier Apr 1999 A
5894228 Reddy et al. Apr 1999 A
5898602 Rothman et al. Apr 1999 A
5931898 Khoury Aug 1999 A
5942914 Reddy et al. Aug 1999 A
5944774 Dent Aug 1999 A
5949710 Pass et al. Sep 1999 A
5951673 Miyata Sep 1999 A
5956265 Lewis Sep 1999 A
5959871 Pierzchala et al. Sep 1999 A
5960193 Guttag et al. Sep 1999 A
5961635 Guttag et al. Oct 1999 A
5963048 Harrison et al. Oct 1999 A
5963050 Young et al. Oct 1999 A
5968196 Ramamurthy et al. Oct 1999 A
5970254 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
5978260 Trimberger et al. Nov 1999 A
5982195 Cliff et al. Nov 1999 A
5986465 Mendel Nov 1999 A
5991788 Mintzer Nov 1999 A
5991898 Rajski et al. Nov 1999 A
5995748 Guttag et al. Nov 1999 A
5999015 Cliff et al. Dec 1999 A
5999990 Sharrit et al. Dec 1999 A
6005806 Madurawe et al. Dec 1999 A
6006321 Abbott Dec 1999 A
6009451 Burns Dec 1999 A
6020759 Heile Feb 2000 A
6021423 Nag et al. Feb 2000 A
6029187 Verbauwhede Feb 2000 A
6031763 Sansbury Feb 2000 A
6041340 Mintzer Mar 2000 A
6052327 Reddy et al. Apr 2000 A
6052755 Terrill et al. Apr 2000 A
6064614 Khoury May 2000 A
6065131 Andrews et al. May 2000 A
6066960 Pedersen May 2000 A
6069487 Lane et al. May 2000 A
6072994 Phillips et al. Jun 2000 A
6073154 Dick Jun 2000 A
6075381 LaBerge Jun 2000 A
6084429 Trimberger Jul 2000 A
6085317 Smith Jul 2000 A
6091261 DeLange Jul 2000 A
6091765 Pietzold, III et al. Jul 2000 A
6094726 Gonion et al. Jul 2000 A
6097988 Tobias Aug 2000 A
6098163 Guttag et al. Aug 2000 A
6107820 Jefferson et al. Aug 2000 A
6107821 Kelem et al. Aug 2000 A
6107824 Reddy et al. Aug 2000 A
6130554 Kolze et al. Oct 2000 A
6140839 Kaviani et al. Oct 2000 A
6154049 New Nov 2000 A
6157210 Zaveri et al. Dec 2000 A
6163788 Chen et al. Dec 2000 A
6167415 Fischer et al. Dec 2000 A
6175849 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6208687 Clemow Mar 2001 B1
6215326 Jefferson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226735 Mirsky May 2001 B1
6242947 Trimberger Jun 2001 B1
6243729 Staszewski Jun 2001 B1
6246258 Lesea Jun 2001 B1
6279021 Takano et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286024 Yano et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314442 Suzuki Nov 2001 B1
6314551 Borland Nov 2001 B1
6321246 Page et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323680 Pedersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6351142 Abbott Feb 2002 B1
6359468 Park et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362650 New et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366944 Hossain et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367003 Davis Apr 2002 B1
6407576 Ngai et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407694 Cox et al. Jun 2002 B1
6438570 Miller Aug 2002 B1
6453382 Heile Sep 2002 B1
6467017 Ngai et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480980 Koe Nov 2002 B2
6483343 Faith et al. Nov 2002 B1
6531888 Abbott Mar 2003 B2
6538470 Langhammer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542000 Black et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556044 Langhammer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6557092 Callen Apr 2003 B1
6571268 Giacalone et al. May 2003 B1
6573749 New et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574762 Karimi et al. Jun 2003 B1
6591283 Conway et al. Jul 2003 B1
6591357 Mirsky Jul 2003 B2
6600788 Dick et al. Jul 2003 B1
6628140 Langhammer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6700581 Baldwin et al. Mar 2004 B2
6725441 Keller et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728901 Rajski et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731133 Feng et al. May 2004 B1
6744278 Liu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6745254 Boggs et al. Jun 2004 B2
6774669 Liu et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781408 Langhammer Aug 2004 B1
6781410 Pani et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788104 Singh et al. Sep 2004 B2
6836839 Master et al. Dec 2004 B2
6874079 Hogenauer Mar 2005 B2
6904471 Boggs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924663 Masui et al. Aug 2005 B2
6971083 Farrugia et al. Nov 2005 B1
7120656 Lam Oct 2006 B1
7127481 Lam Oct 2006 B1
20010029515 Mirsky Oct 2001 A1
20020089348 Langhammer Jul 2002 A1
20030088757 Lindner et al. May 2003 A1
20040064770 Xin Apr 2004 A1
20040083412 Corbin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040178818 Crotty et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193981 Clark et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050144215 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050166038 Wang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187999 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050267926 Al-Khoraidly et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060075012 Minz et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070185951 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185952 Langhammer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080133627 Langhammer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20100228806 Streicher et al. Sep 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
0 158 430 Oct 1985 EP
0 380 456 Aug 1990 EP
0 411 491 Feb 1991 EP
0 461 798 Dec 1991 EP
0 498 066 Aug 1992 EP
0 555 092 Aug 1993 EP
0 606 653 Jul 1994 EP
0 657 803 Jun 1995 EP
0 660 227 Jun 1995 EP
0 668 659 Aug 1995 EP
0 905 906 Mar 1999 EP
0 909 028 Apr 1999 EP
0 927 393 Jul 1999 EP
0 992 885 Apr 2000 EP
1 031 934 Aug 2000 EP
1 058 185 Dec 2000 EP
1 220 108 Jul 2002 EP
2 283 602 May 1995 GB
2 286 737 Aug 1995 GB
2 318 198 Apr 1998 GB
61-237133 Oct 1986 JP
7-135447 May 1995 JP
WO9527243 Oct 1995 WO
WO9628774 Sep 1996 WO
WO9708606 Mar 1997 WO
WO9812629 Mar 1998 WO
WO9832071 Jul 1998 WO
WO9838741 Sep 1998 WO
WO9922292 May 1999 WO
WO9931574 Jun 1999 WO
WO9956394 Nov 1999 WO
WO0051239 Aug 2000 WO
WO0052824 Sep 2000 WO
WO0113562 Feb 2001 WO
WO2005101190 Oct 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (71)
Entry
Amos, D., “PLD architectures match DSP algorithms,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 17, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 30, 32.
Analog Devices, Inc., The Applications Engineering Staff of Analog Devices, DSP Division, Digital Signal Processing Applications Using the ADSP-2100 Family (edited by Amy Mar), 1990, pp. 141-192).
Andrejas, J., et al., “Reusable DSP functions in FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 456-461.
Aoki, T., “Signed-weight arithmetic and its application to a field-programmable digital filter architecture,” IEICE Transactions on Electronics 1999 , vol. E82C, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 1687-1698.
Ashour, M.A., et al., “An FPGA implementation guide for some different types of serial-parallel multiplier-structures,” Microelectronics Journal, vol. 31, No. 3, 2000, pp. 161-168.
Berg. B.L., et al.“Designing Power and Area Efficient Multistage FIR Decimators with Economical Low Order Filters,” ChipCenter Technical Note, Dec. 2001.
Bursky, D., “Programmable Logic Challenges Traditional ASCI SoC Designs”, Electronic Design, Apr. 15, 2002.
Chhabra, A. et al., Texas Instruments Inc., “A Block Floating Point Implementation on the TMS320C54x DSP”, Application Report SPRA610, Dec. 1999, pp. 1-10.
Colet, p., “When DSPs and FPGAs meet: Optimizing image processing architectures,” Advanced Imaging, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 14, 16, 18.
Crookes, D., et al., “Design and implementation of a high level programming environment for FPGA-based image processing,” IEE Proceedings-Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 4, Aug. 2000, pp. 377-384.
Debowski, L., et al., “A new flexible architecture of digital control systems based on DSP and complex CPLD technology for power conversion applications,” PCIM 2000: Europe Official Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh International Intelligent Motion Conference, Jun. 6-8, 2000, pp. 281-286.
Dick, C., et al., “Configurable logic for digital communications: some signal processing perspectives,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 107-111.
Do, T.-T., et al., “A flexible implementation of high-performance FIR filters on Xilinx FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications: From FPGAs to Computing Paradigm. 8th International Workshop, FPL'98. Proceedings, Hartenstein, R.W., et al., eds., Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1998, pp. 441-445.
“DSP Blocks in Arria GX Devices,” Arria GX Device Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 10-1 through 10-32, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, May 2008.
“DSP Blocks in Stratix & Stratix GX Devices,” Stratix Device Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 6-1 through 6-28, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, Jul. 2005.
“DSP Blocks in Stratix II and Stratix II GX Devices,” Stratix II Device Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 6-1 through 6-34, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, Jan. 2008.
“DSP Blocks in Stratix III Devices,” Stratix III Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 5-1 through 5-50, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, Oct. 2007.
“DSP Blocks in Stratix III Devices,” Stratix III Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 5-1 through 5-40, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, May 2009.
“DSP Blocks in Stratix IV Devices,” Stratix IV Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 4-1 through 4-44, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, May 2008.
“DSP Blocks in Stratix IV Devices,” Stratix IV Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 4-1 through 4-34, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, Nov. 2008.
“DSP Blocks in Stratix IV Devices,” Stratix IV Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 4-1 through 4-36, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, Nov. 2009.
“Embedded Multipliers in Cyclone III Devices,” Cyclone III Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 5-1 through 5-8, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, Jul. 2007.
“Embedded Multipliers in Cyclone III Devices,” Cyclone III Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 4-1 through 4-8, Altera Corporation, San Jose, CA, Jul. 2009.
Gaffar, A.A., et al., “Floating-Point Bitwidth Analysis via Automatic Differentiation,” IEEE Conference on Field Programmable Technology, Hong Kong, Dec. 2002.
Guccione, S.A., “Run-time Reconfiguration at Xilinx,” Parallel and distributed processing: 15 IPDPS 2000 workshops, Rolim, J., ed., May 1-5, 2000, p. 873.
Hauck, S., “The Future of Reconfigurable Systems,” Keynote Address, 5th Canadian Conference on Field Programmable Devices, Jun. 1998, http://www.ee.washington.edu/people/faculty/hauck/publications/ReconfigFuture.PDF.
Heysters, P.M., et al., “Mapping of DSP algorithms on field programmable function arrays,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 400-411.
Huang, J., et al., “Simulated Performance of 1000BASE-T Receiver with Different Analog Front End Designs,” Proceedings of the 35th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 4-7, 2001.
Lattice Semiconductor Corp, ORCA® FPGA Express™ Interface Manual: isp:LEVER® Version 3.0, 2002.
Lucent Technologies, Microelectronics Group,“Implementing and Optimizing Multipliers in ORCA™ FPGAs,”, Application Note.AP97-008FGPA, Feb. 1997.
“Implementing Multipliers in FLEX 10K EABs”, Altera, Mar. 1996.
“Implementing Logic with the Embedded Array in FLEX 10K Devices”, Altera, May 2001, ver. 2.1.
Jinghua Li, “Design a pocket multi-bit multiplier in FPGA ” 1996 2nd International.Conference on ASIC Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.96TH8140), Oct. 21-24, 1996, pp. 275-279.
Jones, G., “Field-programmable digital signal conditioning,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. C36-C38.
Kiefer, R., et al., “Performance comparison of software/FPGA hardware partitions for a DSP application,” 14th Australian Microelectronics Conference. Microelectronics: Technology Today for the Future. Micro '97 Proceedings, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 88-93.
Kramberger, I., “DSP acceleration using a reconfigurable FPGA,” ISIE '99. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No.99TH8465), vol. 3 , Jul. 12-16, 1999, pp. 1522-1525.
Langhammer, M., “How to implement DSP in programmable logic ” Elettronica Oggi, No. 266 , Dec. 1998, pp. 113-115.
Langhammer, M., “Implementing a DSP in Programmable Logic,” Online EE Times, May 1998, http://www.eetimes.com/editorial/1998/coverstory9805.html.
Lazaravich, B.V., “Function block oriented field programmable logic arrays,” Motorola, Inc. Technical Developments, vol. 18, Mar. 1993, pp. 10-11.
Lund, D., et al., “A new development system for reconfigurable digital signal processing,” First International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (Conf. Publ. No. 471), Mar. 27-29, 2000, pp. 306-310.
Miller, N.L., et al., “Reconfigurable integrated circuit for high performance computer arithmetic,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEE Colloquium on Evolvable Hardware Systems (Digest), No. 233, 1998, pp. 2/1-2/4.
Mintzer, L., “Xilinx FPGA as an FFT processor,” Electronic Engineering, vol. 69, No. 845, May 1997, pp. 81, 82, 84.
Faura et al., “A Novel Mixed Signal Programmable Device With On-Chip Microprocessor,” Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Santa Clara, CA, USA, May 5, 1997, pp. 103-106.
Nozal, L., et al., “A new vision system: programmable logic devices and digital signal processor architecture (PLD+DSP),” Proceedings IECON '91. 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation(Cat. No.91CH2976-9), vol. 3, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 2014-2018.
Papenfuss, J.R, et al., “Implementation of a real-time, frequency selective, RF channel simulator using a hybrid DSP-FPGA architecture,” RAWCON 2000: 2000 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.00EX404), Sep. 10-13, 2000, pp. 135-138.
Parhami, B., “Configurable arithmetic arrays with data-driven control,” 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 89-93.
“The QuickDSP Design Guide”, Quicklogic, Aug. 2001, revision B.
“QuickDSP™ Family Data Sheet”, Quicklogic, Aug. 7, 2001, revision B.
Rangasayee, K., “Complex PLDs let you produce efficient arithmetic designs,” EDN (European Edition), vol. 41, No. 13, Jun. 20, 1996, pp. 109, 110, 112, 114, 116.
Rosado, A., et al., “A high-speed multiplier coprocessor unit based on FPGA,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 48, No. 11-12, 1997, pp. 298-302.
Santillan-Q., G.F., et al., “Real-time integer convolution implemented using systolic arrays and a digit-serial architecture in complex programmable logic devices,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Design of Mixed-Mode Integrated Circuits and Applications (Cat. No. 99EX303) Jul. 26-28, 1999, pp. 147-150.
Stratix III Device Handbook, vol. 1, pp. 5-22 through 5-23, Altera Corporation, San Jose CA, Nov. 2006.
Texas Instruments Inc., “TMS320C54x DSP Reference Set, vol. 1: CPU and Peripherals”, Literature No. SPRU131F, Apr. 1999, pp. 2-1 through 2-16 and 4-1 through 4-29.
Tisserand, A., et al., “An on-line arithmetic based FPGA for low power custom computing,” Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 9th International Workshop, FPL'99, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1673), Lysaght, P., et al., eds., Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 1999, pp. 264-273.
Tralka, C., “ Symbiosis of DSP and PLD,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 14 , Jul. 11, 2000, pp. 84-96.
Valls, J., et al., “A Study About FPGA-Based Digital Filters,” Signal Processing Systems, 1998, SIPS 98, 1998 IEEE Workshop, Oct. 10, 1998, pp. 192-201.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Jan. 25, 2001, module 2 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 1 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 2 of 4.
“Virtex-5 XtremeDSP Design Considerations,” User Guide, UG193 (v1.3), pp. 71-72, Xilinx Corporation, Jul. 28, 2006.
Walters, A.L., “A Scaleable FIR Filter Implementation Using 32-bit Floating-Point Complex Arithmetic on ,a FPGA Based Custom Computing Platform,” Allison L. Walters, Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Jan. 30, 1998.
Weisstein, E.W., “Karatsuba Multiplication ” MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource (Dec. 9, 2007), accessed Dec. 11, 2007 at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KaratsubaMultiplication.html.
Wenzel, L., “Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to replace digital signal processor integrated circuits,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 5, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 78-86.
“Xilinx Unveils New FPGA Architecture to Enable High-Performance, 10 Million System Gate Designs”, Xilinx, Jun. 22, 2000.
“Xilinx Announces DSP Algorithms, Tools and Features for Virtex-II Architecture”, Xilinx, Nov. 21, 2000.
Xilinx Inc., “Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Advance Product Specification, DS031-2 (v1.9), Nov. 29, 2001, Module 2 of 4, pp. 1-39.
Xilinx Inc., “Using Embedded Multipliers”, Virtex-II Platform FPGA Handbook, UG002 (v1.3), Dec. 3, 2001, pp. 251-257.
Xilinx, Inc., “A 1D Systolic FIR,” copyright 1994-2002, downloaded from http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/˜aboulham/F6221/Xilinx%20A%201D%20systolic%20FIR.htm.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Future of FPGA's,” White Paper, available Nov. 14, 2005 for download from http://www.xilinx.com/prs—rls,5yrwhite.htm.
“XtremeDSP for Spartan-3A DSP,” User Guide, UG431 (v1.0), pp. 29-30, Xilinx Corporation, Apr. 2, 2007.
“XtremeDSP for Virtex-4 FPGAs,” User Guide, UG073 (v2.4), pp. 35-36, Xilinx Corporation, Jan. 8, 2007.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61927112 Jan 2014 US