This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2004/003824, filed on Feb. 6, 2004, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference to its entirety.
The present disclosure relates to liquid dispensing systems capable of delivering, with great precision, very small volumes, typically from 1 nanoliter to several milliliters.
The present disclosure concerns, more particularly, a pipette verification device and a pipette fitted with the same.
The pipettes currently available on the market, often called micropipettes, are syringes including a cylinder extended by a shaft and a dispensing tip and a piston sliding in the cylinder. This piston can be actuated, manually or by a motor, over a travel determined by the operator using a suitable counter.
During operation, the piston is pushed down to its end position, the dispensing tip mounted at the end of the shaft is dipped into the liquid to be sampled, then the piston is moved up by a distance corresponding to the volume of liquid displayed on the counter. The upward movement of the piston causes the desired volume of liquid to be aspirated only into the tip, the liquid being then able, via another downward movement of the piston, to be discharged into a target reserved therefore.
Pipettes of this type, both manual and motorized, are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,983,733, 6,170,343 and 6,254,832. Multishaft pipettes are also disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,779,467 and 5,456,879.
According to the requirements of the “Good Laboratory and Manufacturing Processes” applied to pipettes, monitoring and recording measures should be taken regarding the volume of liquid dispensed. Malfunction of a pipette means that all the tests carried out with the instrument may have to be reconsidered, which constitutes an expensive operation.
Moreover, the quality of a pipette's performance may necessarily fall off over time. After a certain number of operations, each pipette may have to undergo a preventive maintenance procedure. Operators thus have not only to determine after how many pipetting operations such maintenance has to be carried out, but may also keep pipette calibration records.
Finally, account may have to be taken of the fact that the accuracy of the pipette also depends on the operator, who may be more or less skilled and who determines the temperature of the instrument, which influences the volume of aspirated air.
It is an object of the present disclosure to meet the quality control requirements that have just been mentioned.
More precisely, the present disclosure relates to a verification device for a pipette with a piston for aspirating then dispensing, using a shaft, a determined volume of liquid. This device may include:
first means for supplying a displaced volume measurement, comparing this measurement to a desired value and generating an indication of the difference between the measured volume and the desired value; and
second means, responding to the first means, for delivering an information relating to the indication.
The device defined hereinbefore may also include one or more of the following main features:
The present disclosure also relates to a pipette integrating a verification device as previously defined.
The present disclosure further relates to a control and recording unit for managing a plurality of pipettes fitted with the verification device disclosed hereinbefore. This unit may include a computer that can be reduced, more simply, to a microprocessor device dedicated to this function, and a transceiver capable of making the computer communicate with the transceiver of each of the pipettes.
Advantageously, the computer of this unit may be programmed such that the following operations are carried out:
Other features and advantages of the present disclosure will appear from the following description, made with reference to the annexed drawings, in which:
The pipette shown in
Piston 11 can also be actuated by a motor, which replaces the action exerted manually by the operator.
The peculiarity of this pipette lies in the fact that it may be provided with a verification module 16, which, in the example shown, occupies the extension of cylinder 10 and may include:
Sensor 17 may include two chambers inserted in series, via a fluid restrictor, on the path of the fluid that flows into the shaft and provided with an elastically deformable wall. Two electromechanical transducers respectively associated with the elastic wall of each chamber may supply an electric signal representative of the pressure prevailing therein. A temperature sensor may be arranged in proximity to the restrictor. This device may be implemented in accordance with that disclosed in document WO 02/071001 to which reference can be made for a complete description.
Finally, transceiver 23 may communicate, at short distance, outside the pipette, with another transceiver 25 associated with a computer 26, which form a central control and recording unit capable of managing a plurality of pipettes. The word “computer” used in the present document can also designate any microprocessor device dedicated to the unit. The communication function between the pipettes and the central unit may be achieved by any appropriate means known to those skilled in the art, such as hard-wired, infrared or radio (IEEE 802.15 or Bluetooth) transmissions.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, verification module 16 can either form an integral part of the pipette, or be added to a conventional existing pipette. In the first case, only sensor 17 has to be placed along shaft 13, the other components being able to be incorporated in the body of the pipette and interconnected by any means available to those skilled in the art. In the second case, module 16 can either be inserted between the end of shaft 13 and its tip 14, or be incorporated in an assembly linking together piston 11 and shaft 13.
Reference will now be made to
When the operator wishes to carry out a series of liquid sampling and deposits, he may begin, at 27, on computer 26, by identifying himself and indicating the time and date of his intervention, then by specifying, for example, the following parameters:
Fewer parameters or more parameters may, of course, be specified.
Once the identified pipette has been switched on using control button 22, the command can be given, at 28, to start operations. Computer 26 may then send the necessary instructions to the pipette, at 29.
These instructions may be received, at 30, by microprocessor 18 of the pipette, which may then be ready to operate.
After having adjusted counter 15 to the value of the volume to be dispensed, the operator then may take a sample of the liquid, which takes place, by aspiration, in tip 14 of the pipette.
During this operation, microprocessor 18 may receive from sensor 17 signals representative of the temperature and pressures in its two chambers. These three items of information allow it to calculate, at 31, the fluid flow rate into shaft 13, then, by integration, the volume of liquid aspirated into its tip 14.
The next operations may include, at 32, comparison of the measured volume with the desired value received from the computer, then, at 33, display on LCD 20 of a message indicating that the aspirated volume is—or is not—within the imposed tolerance limits.
If the desired value has been respected, the operator can then actuate his pipette to eject the liquid into the target intended therefore. If, conversely, the desired value has not been respected, acoustic alarm 21 may be actuated.
Microprocessor 18 may also send to the computer, at 34, the result of the comparison, which may be received at 35 then processed, at 36, so as to carry out a quality check in accordance with the rules of the “Good Laboratory and Manufacturing Processes”.
Typically, the information elaborated and stored at 36 by computer 26 for a determined pipette are as follows (non exhaustive list):
The next operation, at 7, may be to determine whether the operation is a success or failure.
In the event of a failure, computer 26 may send the pipette, at 38, the command, received at 30, to remedy the defect that caused the failure and to take another sample of liquid.
When the operation has been successful, computer 26 may determine, at 39, whether the operations defined in the protocol have finished.
If this is not the case, computer 26 may send the pipette, at 40, the command, received at 30, to continue operations. If, conversely, the protocol has finished, the computer may return to 27 to begin a new series of liquid sampling and deposits.
In the case of a pipette whose piston is driven by an actuator, such as a motor, the pipette microprocessor 18 may optionally use the result of its comparison 32 between the measured volume and the desired value to carry out, at 41, enslavement of the actuator which may drive the piston such that its travel allows the volume of liquid imposed by the desired value to be aspirated.
Reference will be made, in conclusion, to the alternative embodiment of
Thus, there is proposed an intelligent pipette design, provided with a device for verifying its operations and benefiting from the assistance of a central unit that controls and monitors it. All of the requirements of a modern and efficient quality system are thus satisfied.
Needless to mention that the design of the invention can apply both to single shaft pipettes and multiple shaft pipettes.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/003824 | 2/6/2004 | WO | 00 | 8/7/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/085775 | 9/15/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4779467 | Rainin et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4780833 | Atake | Oct 1988 | A |
4790176 | Marteau d'Autry | Dec 1988 | A |
4976161 | Czernecki et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5456879 | Suovaniemi | Oct 1995 | A |
5750881 | Dorenkott et al. | May 1998 | A |
5857893 | Olsen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5983733 | Strandberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998218 | Conley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6060320 | Dorenkott et al. | May 2000 | A |
6170343 | Conley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6254832 | Rainin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6553824 | Lutze | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20030019305 | Richter et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040020938 | Boillat et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 02071001 | Sep 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070056351 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |