The invention relates to a pistol with a rotary barrel according to the preamble of claim 1.
Pistols with a rotary barrel are known per se but are not very widespread. Firstly, they are considered as shooting particularly quietly and are therefore desirable since the barrel carries out a movement only about its axis or the bore axis, whereas, for example in the case of drop barrel pistols, the center of gravity of the barrel carries out a vertical movement to which a rotational movement about a transverse axis of the weapon is also added, which makes the weapon noisy per se. Since, however, on the other hand, in the case of the rotary barrel, the components necessary for carrying out and limiting the rotational movement are subjected to extremely hard stresses and experience a high degree of wear, which in practice time and again leads to problems in the reliability of such weapons, pistols with a rotary barrel have not really taken off.
As an example of pistols with a rotary barrel, reference is made to EP 359 715, corresponding to U.S. Pat. No. 4,984,504, the content of said US document is incorporated by reference into the content of the present application for jurisdictions in which this is possible. According to these documents, the rotational movement of the barrel is brought about by a correspondingly contoured block which is inserted around the restoring spring in the handle piece. Apart from the complicated production and the not entirely straightforward installation and removal, the high dynamic shock-type forces which are to be transmitted upon each shot are not introduced into the handle part directly, but rather via said block, as a result of which great problems relating to the wear and the accuracy of the movement occur.
A weapon of this type can also be found on the internet at www.bing.com/videos with a date of 13 Sep. 2015 by searching the keywords ‘beretta,’ ‘px4,’ and ‘storm,’ or found in the EPO library under XP054976549, and also an identical or similar weapon under XP054976552, or on the internet at www.youtu.be/DOvDmZVOunM.
A firearm which is entirely separate in many details from 1924, which, although it does not have a rotary barrel, does contain a rotatable breech, is known from DE 459 454 and its additional patent corresponding to DE 478 630, overall corresponding to U.S. Pat. No. 1,637,400. The content of said US document is incorporated by reference into the content of the present application for jurisdictions in which this is possible. The weapon disclosed there has a barrel which is movable rectilinearly for a short distance along its axis and moves to the rear together with the carriage and the breech after discharging a shot. Upon reaching its end position, the barrel imparts an additional impulse via a lever to the carriage and therefore accelerates the latter beyond the speed of the breech. At the same time, a control surface of the carriage also comes into contact with a projection of the breech, rotates said projection, as a result of which the form-fitting locking thereof with the barrel is released and the breech moves further rearwards together with the carriage, as a result of which the chamber is finally opened. The necessary correct sequence of the movements requires an accuracy in production which even today cannot be achieved in an economically expedient manner, and there is no mention at all of problems with wear and the risk of soiling and the problematic maintenance. Whether this weapon has ever been provided in practice is unclear.
U.S. Pat. No. 1,427,966 from 1921, the content of said US document is incorporated by reference into the content of the present application for jurisdictions in which this is possible, going back to four German applications from 1915, describes kinematics which are inverse thereto and in which, for the unlocking-locking of the connection between barrel and breech, the barrel is rotated and this is undertaken by means of contact surfaces firstly on the barrel and secondly on the handle part. The same problems as in the previously mentioned construction therefore occur. This weapon has never taken off in practice.
In contrast thereto, pistols with a drop barrel are widespread a million times; in this connection, reference is made, for example, to U.S. Pat. No. 4,539,889, U.S. Pat. No. 4,825,744 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,893,546 which describe such weapons in detail. The content of said documents is incorporated by reference into the content of the present application for jurisdictions in which this is possible.
There is therefore a need to provide a pistol with a rotary barrel that does not have the disadvantages mentioned, but rather is as robust as a pistol with a drop barrel and nevertheless has the advantages associated with the rotary barrel.
It is an aim of the invention to specify such a weapon.
According to the invention, these aims are achieved by a weapon which has the features specified in the characterizing part of claim 1. In other words, the barrel is guided in a form-fitting manner both in its longitudinal movement along the bore axis and in its rotational movement about the bore axis over the entire length of the movement, and it is particularly important that, during the engagement, the beginning of the rotational movement of the barrel is brought about by the interaction of control surfaces on barrel and carriage. By means of this permanent and positive guidance, the mechanical stability which has been lacking in weapons of this type in the prior art is achieved.
The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to the drawings, which depict an exemplary embodiment:
In the description and the claims, the terms “front”, “rear”, “top”, “bottom” and so on are used in the general form and with reference to a pistol which is held in the customary manner. That is to say that the muzzle of the barrel is at the “front”, that the slide or carriage is moved to the “rear” by the explosion gases, etc.
A weapon 1 has a frame 2 which, in integral or constructed form, also comprises a handle in which a magazine is inserted. The illustration of the magazine spring shows that the section is undertaken schematically and not strictly geometrically. A striking pin is illustrated in the slide 3 and a trigger mechanism in the frame 2. This is all prior art and does not require any further explanation. A barrel 4 is mounted in the slide (carriage) 3, as will be described below.
The following geometrical and therefore also dynamic characteristic features (can also be readily seen perspectively in
In “axial direction” should be understood as meaning the direction of the barrel axis or bore axis 10 that should be regarded as defined by the frame for the purposes of the description.
Furthermore, the barrel 4 has a control stud 8 which protrudes into a control groove 9 of the frame 2 (not of the slide 3!). Said control groove 9 has an oblique central region, the one end of which, the front end, is adjoined by a locking region which projects in the axial direction and in which the control stud 8 is located in the position shown in
As a comparison of
This situation can readily be seen in
The final rotational position is illustrated in
It should also be noted that the lateral surface of the control stud 8 (parallel to the bore axis 10), by means of the contact of which with the lateral surface of the control groove 9 the rotational movement of the barrel 4 is ended, leads to a flat contact and therefore creates stable mechanical relationships. Furthermore, it should be pointed out that, in this position, the front surface of the control stud 8, which surface runs normally to the bore axis 10, is at a small distance from the retaining surface 17 (also
Subsequently, the slide 3 is fetched forward again by the restoring spring 5 (
A special characteristic of the invention consists here in that, during the forward motion of the slide (when a cartridge is supplied), the control stud 8 of the barrel 4 is pressed onto the retaining surface 17 of the control groove 9 (in the frame 2), which retaining surface runs normally to the bore axis 10, as a result of which the rotational movement of the barrel 4 does not take place by means of this cooperation which is affected by tolerances, but rather is introduced by the interaction of the contact surface 18 of the associated locking stud 6 of the barrel 4 with the guide-rail-like stop surface 11 (see in particular in
The beginning of the rotational movement of the barrel is therefore brought about by this control surface, the stop surface 11, which is located substantially more precisely with respect to the barrel than every possible component which would be provided fixedly on the frame 2. For this reason and by means of the matching of the shape of the associated locking stud 6 to the shape of the stop surface 11, a reliable and mechanically stable guide is produced which does not show any noticeable wear over the service life of the weapon.
This particular shape of the associated locking stud 6 consists substantially in that the end surface which is at the front in the direction of rotation, the contact surface 18, coincides in its inclination with respect to the bore axis with the inclination of the stop surface 11, and therefore a flat contact connection occurs. The static pressures and the dynamic loadings are therefore reduced by orders of magnitude in comparison to those which occur in the prior art.
During the forward motion, the introduction of the rotation therefore takes place via a flat contact connection of components which are provided and guided with low tolerances with respect to one another, and not via a linear contact between components which are guided highly imprecisely with respect to one another and essentially only indirectly, via the slide 3, as is the case in the prior art.
Only after this introduction of the rotational movement does the further and complete locking of the barrel in the slide take place by means of the control stud 8 in interaction with the control groove 9 in the frame 2, as emerges from
After this complete locking, the two components, slide 3 and barrel 4, run forward together and already locked to each other over the short axial distance (already mentioned above) in the control groove 9 in the direction of the bore axis 10 on the frame 2, as illustrated in
By means of the initiation according to the invention of the beginning of the locking of the barrel by introduction of the rotational movement not by means of the control stud 8 (control cam) in interaction with the frame 2, but rather by the contact surface 18 and a striking surface, the stop surface 11, between slide and barrel, this movement is completely defined and, as appropriate to the circumstances, is initiated in a shock-free manner and by means of flat contact. Furthermore, the relationship between control stud and control groove is designed to be mechanically substantially more compatible than is possible in the prior art and thus ensures the long service life which up to now has not been achieved in the case of pistols with a rotary barrel.
A refinement of the invention that further increases the mechanical stability is apparent from looking at the individual “d” illustrations together: the slide 3 has a shape in the axial direction between the locking grooves 7 and the breech face 13 (
The assembly of such a slide is clear from
The invention is not restricted to the exemplary embodiment illustrated and described, but rather may be modified in different ways. It is thus possible to provide the studs and grooves with a different shape and/or dimension, and the position thereof with respect to the frame, the slide and the barrel may be different than illustrated.
An essential factor during the forward motion is that the beginning of the rotational movement of the barrel with respect to the slide takes place by means of the contact of a stop surface located on the breech, on the one hand, and a mating surface located on the barrel, on the other hand. One of the surfaces here is preferably, but not necessarily, provided on one of the locking studs since the latter have to be present in any case. Simply because of a symmetrical introduction of force, the surface on the slide is preferably arranged in the region which lies opposite the frame and therefore substantially in the plane of symmetry of the weapon in the upper, inner wall region of the slide.
The guidance of the barrel by means of the longitudinal guides 19 is also designed in such a manner that said longitudinal guides do not interact with the two locking studs, but rather with one of the locking studs and the control stud.
The materials to be used are the same as in customary weapons and do not require any further explanation here, likewise the production methods and other technological details.
In summary, it can therefore be stipulated that the invention relates to a pistol 1 with a frame 2, a slide 3 which is movable thereon and a rotary barrel 4 which is located in the slide. The rotary barrel is rotated and is moved axially with respect to the slide between a locked position and an open position by means of cams and grooves.
In order to avoid the wear which is customary in weapons of this type, it is provided that the slide 3 has a stop surface 11 running obliquely with respect to the bore axis, and the barrel has a corresponding contact surface 18. During the locking by the flat contact between said surfaces 11, 18, the beginning of the relative rotational movement is thus initiated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15199414 | Dec 2015 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1427966 | Nickl | Sep 1922 | A |
1637400 | Josef Lovasz | Aug 1927 | A |
2107359 | Altenburger | Feb 1938 | A |
2817174 | Liedke | Dec 1957 | A |
3745881 | Roy | Jul 1973 | A |
4539889 | Glock | Sep 1985 | A |
4825744 | Glock | May 1989 | A |
4893546 | Glock | Jan 1990 | A |
4984504 | Beretta | Jan 1991 | A |
5050481 | Knight, Jr. | Sep 1991 | A |
5585589 | Leiter | Dec 1996 | A |
5649383 | Wesp et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6234059 | Fuchs | May 2001 | B1 |
6314859 | Weichert | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7103998 | McGarry | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7823314 | Wheatley | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8061255 | Boberg | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8807010 | Bubits | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8950100 | Nebeker et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9568262 | Bantle et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20090199450 | Storch | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100275491 | Leiter | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120085225 | Vanek | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20140196337 | Bandini | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20160316336 | Krenz | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170191784 | Kroger | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
459454 | May 1928 | DE |
478630 | Jun 1929 | DE |
D359715 | Mar 1990 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Beretta PX4 Storm review on YouTube at https://youtu.be/wrd2mjVFNoM, published Sep. 13, 2015. |
Grand Power X-Calibur—Competition Ready 9mm review on YouTube at https://youtu.be/DOvDmZVOunM, published Oct. 8, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170198993 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |