The field is internal combustion engines. Particularly the field is related to constructions for thermal management of pistons. In some aspects, the field includes internal combustion engines in which the end surface of a piston crown is insulated from the ring area of the piston. In some other aspects, the field includes high compression diesel engines, particularly opposed-piston diesel engines.
During operation of an internal combustion engine, combustion of an air/fuel mixture occurs in cylinder space defined by the end surface on the crown of at least one piston reciprocating in the cylinder. For example, in an opposed-piston engine, combustion occurs in the cylinder space defined between the end surfaces on the crowns of two opposed pistons near respective top dead center positions in a cylinder. The heat of air compressed between the end surfaces of the crowns causes fuel injected into the heated air to burn. The cylinder space where fuel combusts is typically referred to as a “combustion chamber”.
In order to maximize the conversion of the energy released by combustion into motion, it is desirable to prevent heat from being conducted away from the combustion chamber through the piston. Reduction of heat lost through the piston increases the engine's operating efficiency. Typically, heat transfer through the piston is reduced or blocked by insulating the piston crown from the body of the piston. However, it is also the case that retention of the heat of combustion at the end surface of the piston can cause thermal damage to the piston crown and nearby piston elements.
Piston thermal management is a continuing problem, especially given the ever-increasing loads expected from modern internal combustion engines. In a typical piston, at least four areas are of concern for thermal management: the piston crown, the ring grooves, the piston under-crown, and the piston/wristpin interface. The piston crown can be damaged by oxidation if its temperature rises above the oxidation temperature of the materials of which it is made. Mechanical failure of piston elements can result from thermally-induced material changes. The rings and ring grooves and the lands that border the ring grooves can suffer from carbon build-up caused by oil heated above the coking temperature. As with the ring grooves the under surface of the piston crown can also suffer from oil coking.
A recent study indicates that an opposed-piston engine two-stroke cycle engine exhibits increased thermal efficiency when compared with a conventional six-cylinder four-cycle engine. (Herold, R., Wahl, M., Regner, G., Lemke, J. et al., “Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2216, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2216.) The opposed-piston engine achieves thermodynamic benefits by virtue of a combination of three effects: reduced heat transfer due to a more favorable combustion chamber area/volume ratio, increased ratio of specific heats from leaner operating conditions made possible by the two-stroke cycle, and decreased combustion duration achievable at the fixed maximum pressure rise rate arising from the lower energy release density of the two-stroke engine. With two pistons per cylinder, an opposed-piston engine can realize additional thermodynamic benefits with enhanced piston thermal management.
Enhanced thermal management of the pistons of an opposed-piston engine is realized by provision, in each piston of a pair of opposed pistons, of an annular cavity positioned between the end surface of the piston's crown and the top ring groove of the piston. During engine operation, this cavity reduces the transfer of heat from the piston crown to the piston body, while at the same time reducing or preventing thermal damage to the rings and coking of lubricant in the ring grooves.
The end surface structure of each piston has a periphery surrounding a bowl defining a concave surface. The concave surface includes a first portion curving away from a plane containing the periphery surface toward the interior of the piston and a second portion curving away from the first portion and protruding outwardly in part from the plane. A convex surface opposite the bowl curves away from the periphery and protrudes outwardly from the plane. The convex surface meets the second portion of the concave surface to form a ridge therewith. Preferably, but not necessarily, the bowl has a semi-ellipsoidal shape. The end surface structure is provided on both pistons and the pistons are disposed in the bore of a ported cylinder with their end surfaces oriented to place complementary curved surfaces of the end surface structures in opposition in order to define a combustion chamber. Preferably, but not necessarily, the combustion chamber space defined between these two end surfaces is, or is very close to, an elongated ellipsoidal cylinder, providing a generally symmetrical geometry to reinforce and sustain the tumble motion. This combustion chamber structure adds a tumble to the bulk motion of air in the combustion chamber, thereby increasing turbulence which enhances air/fuel mixing.
The structures of the piston end surfaces that define the combustion chamber are essentially identical to each other; accordingly, the piston 280 shown in
Referring now to
As per
The thermal resistance of the cavity will cause the crown 281 to become hotter, thereby increasing the possibility of oxidation. This can be handled in several ways. One is to manufacture the crown out of a material with a higher oxidizing temperature such as a stainless steel or nickel alloy. The other is to use standard piston materials and apply a surface treatment which increases the surface oxidation temperature of the material. Material properties also degrade with temperature. If standard piston materials are used, the piston can be designed with low enough stress to still satisfy fatigue limits.
In some aspects, provision can be made to cool the interior of each piston by means of liquid coolant that circulates into the piston, across the backside of the crown, and out the bottom of the piston body. For example, with reference to
Although a piston having a cavity to block transfer of heat from the crown to the lower part of the piston has been described with reference to presently preferred embodiments, it should be understood that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the described principles. For example, the piston can have a bowl of various other shapes than as described and illustrated herein. Accordingly, the principles are limited only by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/891,523, filed May 10, 2013, titled, “Piston Thermal Management in an Opposed-Piston Engine”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,464,592 on Oct. 11, 2016, which in turn claims priority to US provisional application 61/646,784, filed May 14, 2012, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. This application contains subject matter related to that of commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/066,589, filed Apr. 18, 2011, for “Combustion Chamber Constructions for Opposed-Piston Engines”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,800,528 on Aug. 12, 2014, and commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/136,955, filed Aug. 15, 2011, for “Piston Constructions for Opposed-Piston Engines”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,163,505 on Oct. 20, 2015.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1584265 | Williams | May 1926 | A |
2494748 | Ernestus | Jan 1950 | A |
3190273 | Bachle et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
4253430 | Garter et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4270494 | Garter et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4356800 | Moebus | Nov 1982 | A |
4553472 | Munro et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4614150 | Deutschmann | Sep 1986 | A |
4651631 | Avezou | Mar 1987 | A |
4870733 | Kawabata et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5724933 | Silvonen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6003479 | Evans | Dec 1999 | A |
6244161 | Myers | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6904876 | Hofbauer et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6938604 | Gabriel et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7458358 | Lineton | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7654240 | Jarrett et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669560 | Elsbett | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7743745 | Scharp | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7900551 | Benz et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7938093 | Rasmussen | May 2011 | B2 |
7987831 | Seifried | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8001946 | Leitl | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8544441 | Azevedo | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8800528 | Fuqua et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9163505 | Dion et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9464592 | Dion et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20070209614 | Scharp | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080134876 | Scharp | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134879 | Hofbauer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100218673 | Ribeiro | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110271932 | Fuqua et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120037113 | Scharp | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120073526 | Dion et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102947545 | Feb 2013 | CN |
3447394 | Jun 1986 | DE |
2577015 | Nov 2013 | EP |
325194 | Feb 1930 | GB |
1028847 | May 1966 | GB |
2209014 | Apr 1989 | GB |
60173346 | Sep 1985 | JP |
WO-2006056315 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2011131266 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Herold, R., Wahl, M.W,, Regner, G., and Lemke, J,U., “Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engines”, SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2216, 2011, doi: 4271/2011-01-2216. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/037289, dated Aug. 20, 2014. |
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017, for Chinese Patent Application No. 2014800260168. |
Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2018, issued by the Japanese Patent Office for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-513066. |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Mar. 20, 2018, issued by the European Patent Office for European Patent Application No. 14731104.7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170009700 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61646784 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13891523 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 15276671 | US |