The subject of the invention is a pitch control ring for a stator vanes stage.
Variable stator vanes are characterised by a variable orientation depending on speed of the machine of which they form part, to optimise operation, particularly of compressors. The angular pitch is fixed by rotating a ring surrounding the stator, to which levers fixed to vane pivots are articulated. The ring rotation is controlled by a device typically comprising an actuator fixed to the stator, an actuator movements transmission that may include a bellcrank (triangular part articulated at its vertices) and a turnbuckle or rod articulated to a clevis at the periphery of the ring.
It has been found that the mechanical load on the control ring is asymmetric depending on the direction of angular displacement imposed on it, for two reasons. The first reason is related to the gas flow in the machine, that applies a lateral thrust and a rotation moment on the vanes and their pivots, therefore tending to rotate the ring in one direction with the result that the force to be applied by the control mechanism to move the ring is much lower in one direction than in the other; the second reason is that since the ring is free to rotate about the stator casing, the forces necessary to rotate it displace it in translation and make it touch the stator casing at opposite portions depending on the direction of the force, and that produce different bending deformations around the ring.
This asymmetry is responsible for a degradation of the precision of the angular pitch of the vanes. This can be overcome by increasing the stiffness of the ring to make it less deformable, or to have it simultaneously controlled by several turnbuckle mechanisms distributed around its circumference. Such arrangements, and especially the latter, have the disadvantage that they increase the weight of the device, that can become unacceptable for small-size machines, for which low weight is essential.
The invention relates to a stator vane pitch control ring that is not very sensitive to operating asymmetries depending on the direction of rotation imposed on it, and that is less heavy than known improvements.
In its general form, the ring according to the invention is composed of two halves having structures with different stiffnesses, located on each side of an articulation clevis of a control mechanism.
The reason for this arrangement is explained as follows. In the direction of rotation for which the force to be applied is lowest, the load and the contact of the ring on the stator casing do not produce any major deformations of the ring; in the other direction of rotation in which the control force must be much higher and the side opposite the ring is pressed on the casing more strongly, a more rigid structure is necessary at least on the side of the ring that is opposite the bearing portion, while the side of the ring that is bearing on the casing is less exposed to these deformations, and therefore the light structure is sufficient for it.
In other words, the half of the ring that bears on the rotor casing in the direction of rotation corresponding to large forces, but is freed from it in the other direction for which forces are lower, can be lighter than the other half.
The first of the halves (corresponding to the light part of the ring) is advantageously composed of a unit section beam, the other half can be composed of a structure formed by two concentric sections connected together by connecting sections.
The unit section beam can be composed of straight segments joined to each other forming a portion of a regular polygon, and control lever articulation bushings can be arranged at the junctions of these segments.
The ring is advantageously controlled by a single mechanism. Another aspect of the invention is a turbomachine compressor comprising such a ring.
The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the following figures:
and
The first half 15 is a relatively lightweight and relatively flexible structure, composed of a beam, in other words a profile with a unit section. The cross-section of the beam is a classical shape such as L, T, etc. or as in this case an I. It may be constructed by bending an initially straight section into a regular polygon sector of which the bushings 9 are at the vertices and that connect segments 17 of the section that remained straight. A profile with an open cross-section, apart from being lighter weight and less rigid, is very suitable for this type of fabrication.
The second half 16 is formed, at least at a central part comprising the part 13, from a more massive structure and therefore more rigid that the first part, in this case composed of two web profiles made of flat sections 18 and 19 curved into arcs of a circle and arranged concentrically, and lateral profiles 20 connecting the web sections 18 and 19 forming different angles with them to form a very rigid lattice structure.
This second half is less regular than the other half. The ring 8 must be reinforced firstly in the part 13 furthest from the part 14 in contact on the casing 2. It can be seen that a part 21 of the second half 16 connecting the central part 13 to the first half 15 becomes less and less rigid relative to the first part, because it corresponds to a sector of the ring 8 with less and less load with increasing distance from the clevis 7 and reducing distance from the first half 15: it comprises firstly a sub-part 22 comprising only the web sections 18 and 19, and then a sub-part 23 comprising only the web section 18; on the other side of the central part 13, a part 25 of the junction to clevis 7 nevertheless remains latticed, since it is subject to high bending forces in the situation in
Although the ring structure 8 is heterogeneous, it is recommended that its material should be homogeneous or even that the halves 15 and 16 should be composed of two materials with the same thermal expansion characteristics (the same coefficient), so as not to introduce new control imprecisions due to differential thermal expansion (that could also embrittle assemblies between different materials).
The structure of the ring 8 is inert and static, in other words its properties do not vary as a function of mechanisms associated with the ring 8 to assume variable control states, when only the usual mechanism for rotating the ring 8 is present. In particular, the shape, dimensions and stiffness of the ring 8 and its individual parts remain invariable (for example neglecting deformations due to forces and temperature variations).
The lengths of the halves 15 and 16 are not necessarily equal.
They are connected to each other, opposite the clevis 7, and to the ends of the clevis 13, by bolted assemblies 24.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17 00227 | Mar 2017 | FR | national |