The present invention relates to scanning radar systems, more particularly to an articulating radar antenna array which does not utilize traditional rotational movement.
Radar systems typically utilize a large scanning antenna array mounted on a rotating platform to revolve the antenna array in the azimuth direction. These rotatable platforms allow the array to be oriented at a particular azimuth angle, or to sweep the array through an entire range of azimuth angles at a predetermined angular rate. In traditional rotating radar systems, one end of the antenna array is pivotally mounted to the rotating platform, forming a cantilevered arrangement in which the array can be tilted to a desired elevation angle with respect to the ground by, for example, a hydraulic linear actuator. In this cantilevered configuration the antenna array often has a center of mass offset vertically and/or horizontally from the center of the rotating platform. The hydraulic actuator and tilting arrangement used to set the tilt angle can create in inaccuracies in the positioning of the antenna array. This is known as the system's pointing error.
Traditional approaches used to rotate the platforms include various conventional drive systems supported by numerous rolling element bearings. These bearings, most notably the main support bearings of the rotatable platforms, are subject to significant load from both the weight of the cantilevered antenna arrays, as well as the large forces acting thereon from dynamic imbalances and wind/ice/snow acting on the exposed surfaces of the antenna array due to above-described offset of the center of mass. These forces can result in the fatigue and eventual failure of the bearings and other driveline components.
Further, the rotational motion of the antenna arrays necessitates the use of components such as slip-rings, for providing the array with power, as well as rotary joints for providing liquid coolant. In addition to reliability issues, slip-rings impose significant power limitations on the system. Likewise, rotary fluid joints are prone to leaking.
Accordingly, a system which eliminates the inherent drawbacks of rotating antenna arrangements is desired, as well as a system that eliminates the need for the typical separate subsystems for leveling the radar base, tilting the antenna array, and rotating it.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a radar system includes an antenna array pivotally mounted to a first end of a center support. A second end of the center support is attached to a base portion. At least two actuators are attached to the antenna array and configured to pivot the antenna array around the center support, altering both its angle of tilt with respect to the ground as well as its azimuth position with respect to the center support. The antenna array is capable of achieving 360° of azimuth revolution by way of this pivoting motion.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The antenna array 12 is pivotally attached to the center support 16 via a spherical bearing 14, such as a pedestal air bearing. The use of the spherical bearing 14 provides for low friction operation, a high degree of articulation in all directions between the center support 16 and the antenna array 12, and a high load-carrying capacity. While the use of a spherical bearing is preferred, it is envisioned that other connection means may be utilized between the antenna array 12 and the center support 16 to provide a similarly pivotal arrangement. For example, flexures, hinges, or bushings may all be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.
In a preferred embodiment, the center support 16 is the primary support means for the antenna array 12. The center support 16 may comprise a telescoping or otherwise extendable member moveable between a first retracted position, a second extended position, and any intermediate position therebetween. This moveable arrangement provides for both compact positioning of the antenna array 12 during storage or transportation in the first position (
Antenna array 12 may be supported and sustained in a tilted position, so that the axis “A” is maintained at a constant tilt angle α with respect to a horizontal plane formed generally parallel to the base 20. (
In a preferred embodiment, the antenna array 12 is both tilted and oriented in the azimuth direction by a first and second actuator 24,25 arranged between the base portion 20 and the antenna array 12. In order to achieve the desired 360° of azimuth coverage and desired tilt angle α, the antenna array 12 is pivotable about both an x and y axis (shown in
The actuators 24,25 are preferably telescoping, electromechanical linear actuators. In a preferred embodiment, the actuators 24,25 comprise lead screw-type actuators. As requirements for improved radar accuracy and the ability to detect smaller and smaller targets increase, so does the need for increased control of the antenna array positioning. Accordingly, lead-screw actuators with precise position monitoring are desirable as a result of their superior control and inherent reliability. However, other embodiments may utilize any suitable type of actuator, such as piston-cylinder arrangements that may be electrically, pneumatically, or hydraulically powered, by way of example only.
The position monitoring of the antenna array 12 may be accomplished by, for example, encoders placed on the actuators 24,25. Moreover, at least one sensor and/or an inertial navigation unit (INU) located within the antenna array 12 may be provided for monitoring the angular position of the antenna array 12. A controller is provided which alters the position of the actuators 24,25. The controller may utilize an array mapping routine to correlate the antenna array's rotational orientation to the system's reference coordinate system.
The drive actuators 24,25 may be coupled to the antenna array 12 by any conventional means. In a preferred embodiment of the radar system 10, the drive actuators 24,25 are coupled to the antenna array 12 by bushings, such as elastomeric bushings 28. Elastomeric bushings 28 provide structural integrity and high-load carrying capabilities, durability, and a 360° range of motion to facilitate multi-axis articulation between the antenna array 12 and the drive actuators 24,25 as the antenna array 12 is moved between various azimuth and tilt positions. In alternative embodiments, the drive actuators 24,25 may be coupled to the antenna array 12 by other means, for example spherical bearings, hinges, or flexures to achieve the multi-axis articulation required for proper operation.
While the exemplary figures show the actuators 24,25 arranged generally vertically, or perpendicular to the base 20, other configurations may warrant different orientations. For example, the actuators 24,25 could be arranged perpendicularly to the antenna array 12, with the elastomeric bushing arranged on the base 20. Further still, the actuators 24,25 could be pivotally connected to both the base 20 and the antenna array 12 using elastomeric bushings on both ends of the actuators 24,25. In this way, the actuators 24,25 may provide a more advantageous load path between the antenna array 12 and the base 20, improving the structural support provided to the antenna array 12, therefore replacing the stay braces or back stays used on radar systems of the prior art.
As described above, the system 10 of the present invention provides the same radar coverage of convention rotating radar systems, without resorting to traditional rotational movement, and thus the above-described drawbacks associated with the components required to achieve said rotation. Further, both the tilt angle α of the antenna array 12 and the azimuth position are controlled by the same components. This is unlike traditional systems which employ separate systems, for example a set of at least three linear actuators to level the radar base, a linear actuator to control the tilt of the antenna array, and a rotational drive mechanism to alter the azimuth orientation. In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, complexity, cost, and weight reductions may be realized over the prior art arrangements.
Referring again to
The counterbalances 30,31 may be most effectively arranged proximal to the outer edges of antenna array 12, supporting the portions of the antenna array 12 likely to experience the most deflection. However, the counterbalances 30,31 may be placed anywhere support is deemed most effective, and/or dictated by packaging constraints. As described above with respect to the actuators 24,25, the counterbalances 30,31 may be mounted in various orientations with respect to the base and the antenna array beyond the generally vertical position shown in order to improve the support provided. The counterbalances 30,31 may comprise linear actuators like those used for the drive actuators 24,25, but may also comprise dampeners, springs, or other suitable components, preferably with telescoping ability.
In an alternative arrangement, the counterbalances 30,31 may be utilized to provided additional motion control, for example, dampening the motion of the antenna array 12 as it is pivoted. This may be particularly important during high-speed sweeps of the antenna array 12, wherein the forces generated in the antenna due to quickened acceleration and deceleration of the antenna array 12 are greater. In either configuration, the use of counterbalances 30,31 provides for the active dynamic adjustment of the antenna array 12, providing significant tuneability and stability control over the arrangements of the prior art.
Still referring to
Referring generally to
While two actuators 24,25 are shown in
While the foregoing describes exemplary embodiments and implementations, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3296621 | Lapp | Jan 1967 | A |
5469182 | Chaffee | Nov 1995 | A |
6111542 | Day et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6218999 | Bousquet et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6404385 | Croq et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407714 | Butler et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6486845 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6512490 | Lee | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6812904 | Tietjen | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6911950 | Harron | Jun 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110234464 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |