Not applicable.
The subject matter of the present application is in the field of tables, and more particularly in the field of separable tables that nest or stack.
Nesting and stacking tables are known. Modular tables that can be connected together for use as a single larger table are also known. These prior stackable or modular tables generally are not attractive, not sturdy in one or more of their modular configurations, and/or not convenient to manipulate. If made of quality materials they are often overly complex and correspondingly expensive to manufacture.
I previously invented a modular pivoting table, and entered it in a design competition at a retail store in Chicago in approximately 2005 or 2006. This table was called “Fan Tables”, and consisted of three tables each having a triangular shape with rounded sides, somewhat like a guitar pick, with a base side supported by an arcuate leg or base formed from bent wire or rod. The three tables were each of different height, and pivotally connected by nesting tubular corner legs spaced from their inner corners by circular connectors projecting radially from the corners. The circular connectors in turn were connected to and spaced from the tables by contiguous extensions of the wire base legs running beneath the table tops and projecting from the inner corners. When the tubular corner legs were nested, the three tables effectively shared a single central leg spaced from the tables, with their three nested connectors forming a visible external hub about which they could pivot between a closed position (in which the three tables were vertically aligned or “nested”) and an open position (in which the three tables were fanned apart in a cloverleaf structure). The table top of the upper table had an area larger than the area of the table tops on the lower tables, so that when the nested tables were rotated closed, the upper table surface covered the lower two tables. The tables could also be separated and used independently.
The central pivot legs and connector structures were complex, difficult and expensive to manufacture, and to my eyes not ideally attractive since the connecting and pivoting structures were exposed and visually distracting. The inner corners of the tables were also structurally weaker than the bases of the tables.
I have invented a nesting, pivoting, modular table system that improves on my earlier Chicago Fan Tables design with a simpler, cleaner, less expensive, more attractive, more functional, and more robust nesting/pivot connection.
The system comprises two or more tables each capable of being used independently, but also capable of being used in multiple pivot-adjusted configurations when nested. The tables of the system each comprise a generally flat table top having an outer “base” side or end, and an inner “corner”. The base is supported by a multi-point leg structure or equivalent (including single wide legs or two or more separate legs) extending to the floor, and the inner corner is supported by a single inner leg extending to the floor. The inner leg supporting the inner corner extends from a lower surface of the table top, beneath the table rather than beyond the table, within the periphery of the table top. In the illustrated example, all of the inner legs are tubular legs.
The tubular leg of the second (upper) table nests vertically inside the hollow tubular leg of the first (lower) table through an opening in the lower table top adjacent the inner corner of the lower table. The upper or topmost table may or may not have an opening in the table top. The nested tables pivot via the nested tubular legs beneath the table surfaces, without any projecting or intervening connecting structure and with a pivot point defined below and within the edges of the table surfaces.
The present pivot connection produces a stronger, more stable table than my earlier design. The pivot connection is also hidden from view in both the nested and separated configurations of the tables, and throughout the entire range of adjustment of the tables when nested. The affect on the visual appearance of the tables is striking and significant in both the nested and separated configurations, as well.
The term “corner” as used herein can be applied not only to polygonal table tops with true corners, but also to table tops of any shape in which an outer or edge portion of the table top is supported by a single underlying tubular leg. This includes circular and oval table top shapes, where an outer, near-edge portion (“corner”) of the circle or an end of the oval is supported by a tubular leg.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the detailed description below, in light of the accompanying drawings.
Referring first to
Referring to
Base legs 26 are formed from bent wire or rod in the illustrated embodiment, with an arcuate base defining at least two spaced points 26b in contact with the floor, and upper ends 26a (
Tubular (inner) legs 30 are cylindrical in the illustrated embodiment and, in at least the lower tables 40 and 60, hollow. Tubular legs 30 are formed from hollow steel or aluminum tubing in the illustrated example, although other materials are possible. Legs 30 preferably have open lower ends, and the length of the inner legs 30 on each upper table is successively longer, so that the lower end of each tubular leg in system 10 rests on the floor when the tables 20, 40 and 60 are nested. The uppermost table in system 10, however, may have a tubular leg with a closed lower end 30b. Legs 30 have upper ends 30a (
It is possible to form some or all of tubular legs 30 with other than cylindrical cross-sections, either interior or exterior. For example, the lowermost cylindrical leg on table 60 might have a cylindrical interior diameter to accept the cylindrical tubular leg of table 40 in a rotating fit, but a non-circular exterior geometry. Another possibility would be to size the interior cylindrical diameter of a lower tubular leg 30 in the system to rotatably accept the non-cylindrical exterior of an upper tubular leg. Tubular legs 30 may also be tapered from top to bottom. Tubular legs 30 may also have variable exterior shapes or cross-sections along their lengths: e.g., a triangular section changing to a circular section, or tapered or twisted sections. “Tubular” should be understood herein to mean a shape wherein an upper leg is capable of rotatably nesting in the hollow interior of a lower leg; it may be that only the lower leg or legs in the tables of system 10 are hollow, and that an upper “tubular” leg might be solid.
The materials used for tables 20, 40 and 60 may vary, including but not limited to combinations of wood, metal, glass and/or plastic. For example, while the illustrated tables 20, 40, and 60 are shown with metal legs 24 and 30 and wood table tops 22, the legs or table tops could be formed from plastic materials. The tables may also be made from a single material—all wood, all plastic, all metal.
Referring to
While tables 20, 40 and 60 are shown as having a substantially identical shape, they may have different shapes provided they maintain a base with a multi-point (two or more points or equivalent) leg support and an inner corner with a single tubular leg.
The dimensions and proportions of the tables 20, 40 and 60 may vary, and are not limited to those illustrated.
Description of Use
In
Referring to
In the closed configuration of
In
In
It should be understood that while three tables of substantially identical form are shown in the illustrated example, the tables may have differently-shaped table tops or base legs, provided they are still able to nest and rotate via the tubular legs 30. Also, the different tables 20, 40 and 60 in a set comprising system 10 could be made from different materials—for example, one with a wood top, one with a metal top, and one with a glass top.
It will finally be understood that the disclosed embodiments represent presently preferred examples of how to make and use the invention, but are intended to enable rather than limit the invention. Variations and modifications of the illustrated examples in the foregoing written specification and drawings may be possible without departing from the scope of the invention. It should further be understood that to the extent the term “invention” is used in the written specification, it is not to be construed as a limiting term as to number of claimed or disclosed inventions or discoveries or the scope of any such invention or discovery, but as a term which has long been conveniently and widely used to describe new and useful improvements in science and the useful arts. The scope of the invention should accordingly be construed by what the above disclosure teaches and suggests to those skilled in the art, and by any claims that the above disclosure supports in this application or in any other application claiming priority to this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2988413 | Bergen | Jun 1961 | A |
3538862 | Patriarca | Nov 1970 | A |
D244075 | Imber et al. | Apr 1977 | S |
D262169 | Sonder et al. | Dec 1981 | S |
D284339 | Berry, Jr. | Jun 1986 | S |
D284340 | Berry, Jr. | Jun 1986 | S |
4938364 | Stadelman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5400719 | Santapa et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5666887 | Grabowski et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5775233 | Kendall | Jul 1998 | A |
5810181 | Emalfarb et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5842425 | van der Aa | Dec 1998 | A |
6550402 | Stone et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Entry |
---|
Paul C. Evans, Fan Tables, drawings submitted for Design Within Reach (DWR) retail design competition, 2005-2006, 4 pages, Paul C. Evans/DWR, Chicago, U.S. |
Paul C. Evans, Bloom fan table, photo of prototype submitted for Design Within Reach (DWR) retail design competition, 2005-2006, 1 page, Paul C. Evans/DWR, Chicago, U.S. |
Paul C. Evans, Fan Tables, drawings submitted for Design Within Reach (DWR) retail design competition, 2005-2006, 1 page (p. 5 of 5), Paul C. Evans/DWR, Chicago, U.S. |