This invention relates to a visual perception device and to a method of creating an image.
Visual perception devices that provide a rendered image have become popular for computing, entertainment and other purposes. A visual perception device is usually a wearable device with a display for rendering the image.
The invention provides a visual perception device including a data store, relational gain data stored in the data store and representing a plurality of reference locations and a plurality of gain values, each gain value corresponding to a respective reference location, a video data receiver connectable to a video data channel to receive video data including a plurality of pixels, a correlator connected to the relational gain data and the video data receiver and operable to correlate each pixel with a reference location in the relational gain data to find a gain value corresponding to the respective pixel, a beam modulator connected to the video data receiver and the correlator and operable to modify an intensity value of the respective pixel based on the gain value for the respective pixel to determine a modulated intensity value for the respective pixel and a laser projector connected to the beam modulator and operable to generate a respective beam of light corresponding to the modulated intensity value of each respective pixel and transmit the beams of light in a pattern wherein the beams of light are spatially separated.
The invention also provides a method of creating an image including storing relational gain data representing a plurality of reference locations and a plurality of gain values, each gain value corresponding to a respective reference location, receiving video data including a plurality of pixels over a video data channel, correlating each pixel with a reference location in the relational gain data to find a gain value corresponding to the respective pixel, modifying an intensity value of the respective pixel based on the gain value for the respective pixel to determine a modulated intensity value for the respective pixel, generating a respective beam of light corresponding to the modulated intensity value of each respective pixel and transmitting the beams of light in a pattern wherein the beams of light are spatially separated.
The invention is further described by way of examples with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A data entry in video data is referred to herein as a “pixel”. The term “pixel” is also used to refer to one location in a two-dimensional pattern where light is created for display to a user. The data entry in the video data includes an intensity value that influences an intensity of the light in the two-dimensional pattern. The term “pixel” is also sometimes used to refer to a particular transformation that happens at a moment in time between when the “pixel” is in the video data and when the “pixel” refers to light in the two-dimensional pattern. In other instances, for example when the video data is used to generate laser light, the term “pixel” may not be used because the focus of the description may be on other aspects such as the functioning of one or more lasers or other light sources.
“Intensity” is used herein to refer to the power coming from a single pixel. “Brightness” is used to refer to the power of multiple pixels, or regions of the viewable image as seen by a user, and depends at least in part on the density of the pixels. In some embodiments, other factors such as relay optics design, environmental lighting conditions, background scene colors and patterns can affect perceived brightness or brightness uniformity of an image. Although more “intensity” of individual pixels will result in more overall brightness over an area, it will be more understandable herein to exclude “intensity” of individual pixels from the definition of “brightness”. As such, “brightness” will be primarily discussed in the context of areas that are brighter or darker due differences in pixel density.
The laser driver chip 12 includes a video data receiver 26, a beam modulator 28, a look-up table 30 holding relational pattern-based gain data 32, further look-up tables holding relational pupil-based gain data 34 and 36, an eye analyzer 38, a write/read alternator 40, and a correlator in the form of a pixel counter 42.
The video data receiver 26 is connected to the video data channel 16. The beam modulator 28 is connected to the video data receiver 26 and provides an output to the laser projector 18.
The relational pattern-based gain data 32 includes a plurality of reference locations and corresponding gain values. Each reference location corresponds to a particular position of a pattern that is inherent in the functioning of a fiber scanner of the laser projector 18. Each reference location includes gain values for a plurality of colors, in the present example for red, green and for blue. The pixel counter 42 is connected to the video data receiver 26 and to the look-up table 30. The beam modulator 28 is connected to the look-up table 30 and the pixel counter 42.
The relational pupil-based modifying data 34 and 36 are connected to the write/read alternator 40. The write/read alternator 40 is connected to the pixel counter 42 and provides an output to the beam modulator 28. The write/read alternator 40 is connected to the eye analyzer 38 to receive an input from the eye analyzer 38.
The off-chip support system 14 includes a table holding relational background-based gain data 46 and a background analyzer 48. The relational background-based gain data 46 is connected to the pixel counter 42. The background analyzer 48 is connected to the relational background-based gain data 46. The beam modulator 28 is connected to the relational background-based gain data 46.
The laser projector 18 includes a plurality of lasers, which can include including red, green, blue and infrared (IR) lasers 50A, 50B, 50C, and 50D, respectively. The laser projector 18 may activate the lasers 50A to 50D in a sequence based on the image data. For purposes of further discussion, a two-dimensional pattern that is created by one of the lasers, for example, the red laser 50A, is discussed. It will however be understood that each laser 50A to 50D will create a selected pattern, but in a different color. If the patterns for the different colors are the same, then it is likely that their intensity values may differ from color to color.
The laser projector 18 includes an optical fiber scanner 52 that is in communication with the lasers 50A to 50D. An actuator (not shown) may move the optical fiber scanner 52 in two dimensions according to a selected scan pattern. Light received by the optical fiber scanner 52 from the lasers 50A to 50D leaves the optical fiber scanner 52 and is projected to form a two-dimensional pattern 54. The laser light is passed through a lens system (not shown) to prepare it for injection into the image relay 20.
The present embodiment includes a laser projector 18 that generates laser light. Another embodiment may use a different system, for example a light emitting diode-based system, that may generate light other than laser light.
The laser projector 18, eye tracking camera 24, image relay 20 and background camera 22 are all mounted to a common frame and are thus stationary relative to one another. The frame can be worn by a person. The image relay 20 is then located in front of an eye 56 of the person. In the present example, the image relay 20 is a selectively transparent member. Light from a background 58 and objects in the background 58 transmits through the image relay 20 to the eye 56. The person can thus see the background 58 and the objects in the background 58 through the image relay 20. The image relay may be of the kind described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/331,218, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The laser projector 18 is mounted in a position wherein the optical fiber scanner 52 is directed at the image relay 20. The optical fiber scanner 52 is actuated such that the output end follows a selected scan pattern and creates an image by projecting light along scan pattern to create the pattern 54 of projected light in an x-y plane. The image is projected either directly or through a lens system into the image relay 20. Light from the pattern 54 then transmits through a reflective path through the image relay 20 and exits the image relay 20 near the eye 56. Only one light path of one pixel is shown in a y-z plane although it should be understood that each dot, or pixel, in the pattern 54 travels in x-y-z dimensions before leaving the image relay 20. The pattern 54 that is created by the projection of light from optical fiber scanner 52 is the same pattern that makes up the virtual component of the total image received by a user's eye and is viewable by the eye 56 after the light leaves the image relay 20. The eye 56 thus receives real world light from the background 58 and light from the optical fiber scanner 52 via the image relay 20 simultaneously. An augmented reality system is provided wherein a scene of real world objects that the person sees in the background 58 is augmented with rendered content such as a two-dimensional or three-dimensional an image or a video created by light from the laser projector 18. In such a scene the rendered content may be displayed in a manner that gives the perception that rendered content is located on a real world object such as on a real world table or against a real world object such as against a real world wall, or may be displayed in a manner that gives the perception that the rendered content is floating in space in front of the scene of real world objects.
For purposes of explanation, all pixels in the given example have intensity values that are more than zero, although it will be understood that some pixels may have intensity values of zero so that no light is created for those pixels. While the pattern 54 shows pixels being projected over a majority of the field of view, it is possible to only project a limited number of pixels in a desired area of the pattern such that a virtual image smaller than the entire field of view that is projected toward the image relay 20.
The eye tracking camera 24 is mounted in a position to capture images of the eye 56. The eye tracking camera 24 may, for example, receive light from the eye 56. Alternatively, an infrared emitter may emit infrared light that is reflected by the eye 56 and is captured by the eye tracking camera 24. The eye analyzer 38 is connected to the eye tracking camera 24.
Light from the background 58 is captured by the background camera 22. The background camera 22 may, for example, have a detector that detects environmental light in two dimensions transmitted from the background 58. The background analyzer 48 is connected to the background camera 22.
In use, the look-up table 30 including the relational pattern-based gain data 32 is stored in a data store on the laser driver chip 12 (see also
The beam modulator 28 determines the intensity for each color of a pixel from the video data 68) and provides the data to the laser projector 18. By way of example, the laser projector 18 activates the red laser 50A. The red laser 50A provides red laser light to the optical fiber scanner 52. When the laser light exits the optical fiber scanner 52, the laser light couples into the image relay 20, either directly or indirectly through relay optics, lenses, scanning mirrors, or folding mirrors, at a particular location that depends on the location of the optical fiber scanner 52 at that particular moment in time. The beam modulator 28 may provide green, blue and optionally IR pixel data, including color designation for each pixel, and intensity value to the laser projector 18 in the same way. The beam modulator 28 then provides the second red pixel and its corresponding intensity value to the laser projector. The red laser 50A then creates a red laser light and provides the red laser light to the optical fiber scanner 52. The red laser light leaves the optical fiber scanner 52 and couples into the image relay 20 at a different location than where the first red pixel coupled into the image relay 20. The red laser 50A is repeatedly activated while the optical fiber scanner 52 continues to move in two dimensions. Red laser light couples into the image relay 20 and creates the pattern 54, which is a two-dimensional pattern in an x-y plane. By way of example, the pattern 54 is created by actuating the optical fiber scanner 52 in a scan pattern. As shown, the scan pattern may include a spiral pattern that starts with a small circular shape and then continues to grow larger by increasing the scan radius over time over a two-dimensional area.
The respective beams of laser light of the pattern 54 couple into the image relay 20 at different angles then reflect within the image relay 20, whereafter the beams exit the image relay 20 and the same pattern 54 is viewable by the eye 56.
Furthermore, the design of the image relay 20 may cause individual pixels in certain areas of the pattern to be brighter than pixel in other areas of the pattern when the pixels are outcoupled to the user's eye. In
Referring again to
The pixel counter 42 has a number of different functions, including (i) holding a number (ii) incrementing the number (iii) look-up (iv) forwarding a value and (v) reset. These functions are not shown as separate modules in the apparatus drawing of
The pixel counter 42 includes a number that is initially set to zero (80). The pixel counter 42 then counts the pixels that are received by the video data receiver 26 such that, each time a new pixel is received by the video data receiver 26, the pixel counter 42 increases the previously stored number by one (82). The pixel counter 42 then uses the number to find the reference location within the relational pattern-based gain data 32 corresponding to the number tracked by the pixel counter 42. For the first number, the pixel counter 42 finds the first reference location. The pixel counter 42 thus serves as a correlator that is operable to correlate each pixel with a reference location in the relational pattern-based gain data 32. The pixel counter 42 then extracts the corresponding gain value for the reference location that it has found. The gain value represents a pattern-based gain that is determined from the respective number (86).
For purposes of illustration,
The beam modulator 28 multiplies the intensity value from the video data 68 with the gain value from the pixel counter 42 as determined from the relational pattern-based gain data 32. The beam modulator 28 thus calculates a combined intensity value for the respective pixel (88) and a modified intensity value, namely the original intensity value in the video data as modified by the combined gain value. The beam modulator 28 then provides that modified intensity value to the laser projector 18 and the laser projector 18 activates the red laser 50A to an output light level that corresponds to the modified intensity value (90).
When the video data receiver 26 receives the second pixel, the pixel counter 42 increases the reference number by one (82). Each time that another pixel is received, the beam modulator 28 calculates a combined intensity value using the intensity value provided with the video data 68 and the gain value stored in the look-up table 30 associated with the number of the pixel as determined by the reference number stored in the pixel counter 42. The process is repeated until the last pixel in the pattern has been counted. In the case of a spiral pattern, the last pixel may correspond to the outermost pixel in the spiral pattern; however, any pixel can be associated with the beginning, and therefore end, of the pixel counter reference number series. The pixel counter 42 determines that the last pixel has been counted (84). If the last pixel has been counted, the pixel counter 42 resets the number to zero (80) and the scan pattern of the optical fiber 52 is ready to begin again for a subsequent image frame.
The fiber scanner has now reached the outermost point in its spiral pattern and subsequently returns to its original position by following a path that spirals inward from the outermost point back to its original location. The inward and outward spirals are formed at the same resonant frequency, although in some embodiments fewer revolutions are required to return the fiber scanner to its original position than when spiraling outward.
An optical fiber scanner has an optical fiber that bends so that a tip of the optical fiber follows a spiral pattern. The spiral pattern begins at a center point and revolves around the center point with an increasing radius. The scan pattern may include many revolutions about the center point. Each revolution may be formed at a frequency that is substantially constant. Each revolution is thus formed in approximately the same length of time. Because outer revolutions cover a longer distance than inner revolutions, the tip of the optical fiber has more velocity when forming the outer revolutions than when forming the inner revolutions. Due to changes in velocity of the scanner, some pixels appear brighter than other pixels. In particular, areas of an image where the scanning beam has a higher velocity results in pixels, or regions of the image, with less brightness. Referring back to
For a number of reasons, pixels near a center of the spiral pattern are more densely spaced than pixels in an outer region, resulting in more overall brightness in the center than in an outer region. One reason why pixels in an inner region are more closely spaced is because the optical fiber travels faster when forming the outer circles than when forming the inner circles and pixels are created at a rate that remains substantially constant. Another reason is that, for reasons that are particular to a spiral pattern, there is more path per unit area in a center of a spiral pattern than in an outer region of the spiral pattern and a space between two inner circles may not be any wider than a space between outer circles.
In the pattern on the right of
In the pattern on the right of
The gain values of
In some embodiments, additional gain values are used to further adjust the intensity of one or more pixels produced by a laser projector. Referring back to
The pixel counter 42 is connected to the relational background-based gain data 46 to determine a gain value corresponding to the reference number of the pixel counter and thus determines a background-based gain for the pixel associated with the reference number (98). The pixel counter 42 provides the background-based gain value for the number to the beam modulator 28. The beam modulator 28 includes the background-based gain value in the product of the combined gain value (88) used to adjust pixel intensity. An output of the beam modulator 28 to the laser projector 18 thus includes a factor that is a compensation based on lighter or darker areas of the background 58.
In some embodiments, additional gain adjustment may be provided in response to a user's pupil location relative to the optical relay 20. Multiple tables of the pupil-based gain data 34 and 36 may be stored within the laser driver chip 12 at the same time that the look-up table 30 is stored within the laser driver chip 12 (104). One or more eye tracking camera 24 captures video data of the eye 56 (106).
Every time that the gaze direction of the eye 56 changes, or after a predetermined time increment, the eye analyzer 38 provides the new gaze direction to the write/read alternator 40. The write/read alternator 40 selects a particular table that holds a respective set of relational pupil-based modifying data 34 or 36 based on the gaze direction received from the eye analyzer 38 (128). Only two sets of relational pupil-based modifying data 34 or 36 are shown, although many more tables may be included, each for holding gain values when a respective gaze angle is calculated. Three of the sets of relational pupil-based gain data hold gain values that modify intensity values as shown in
In
In
In
The video data 68 is provided through a fast interface and allows from 8 to 10 bit data at video rates. A gain value 140 to the second current driver 132 and a threshold data 142 to the first current driver 130 are sent through slow interfaces, typically less than 1 MHz update rate and cannot be varied at video rates. The gain value 140 sets the maximum current output for the specific laser such that the video scales over the required current range and yields the maximum number of color values. In effect the video current is equal to the intensity value in video data 68 times the gain value 140.
The drive channel further has a gain-setting DAC (GDAC) 146 connected to the second current driver 132 to provide the gain value 140. A multiplier 148 is used to multiply separate gains for each pixel from the look-up table 30 and from the video data 68 are multiplied by an overall gain 150 that is used for ambient light or overall brightness adjustments. The result is converted to an analog voltage and used as the gain (reference) input to the second current driver 132.
The optical fiber follows a pattern from left to right and then returning from right to left on some slightly lower path and proceeds in this manner until it has completed its lowest path. When the optical fiber has completed its lowest path, it proceeds to follow pattern from left to right and then from right to left on a slightly higher path and proceeds in this manner until it reaches its original starting position at the top.
The invention may find application when using scanners other than optical fiber scanners, for example when using a MEMS scanner. A MEMS scanner has a MEMS mirror that reflects laser light. The MEMS mirror rotates about one or more axes so that the laser light that reflects from the MEMS mirror follows a path that has a predetermined pattern. The MEMS mirror typically resonates at a frequency. Because of the way that the MEMS mirror is configured, the pattern may or may not be a spiral pattern or a raster scan pattern as discussed above with respect to the path that is created with an optical fiber scanner. A MEMS scanner may create a pattern at frequency that results in differences in intensities between pixels and differences in densities of pixels.
As described, one or more lasers are used to generate red, green, blue and optionally infrared light. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may also find application when a superluminescent light emitting diode (LED) or other laser or laser-like system is used.
The laser driver chip 12 includes a data store 160 and its own processor 162. The exemplary computer system 900 includes a processor 902 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU) or both), a main memory 904 (e.g., read only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic random access memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM (RDRAM), etc.), and a static memory 906 (e.g., flash memory, static random access memory (SRAM), etc.), which communicate with each other via a bus 908.
The computer system 900 may further include a disk drive unit 916, and a network interface device 920.
The disk drive unit 916 includes a machine-readable medium 922 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions 924 (e.g., software) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The software may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 904 and/or within the processor 902 during execution thereof by the computer system 900, the main memory 904 and the processor 902 also constituting machine-readable media.
The software may further be transmitted or received over a network 928 via the network interface device 920.
While the machine-readable medium 922 is shown in an exemplary embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic media, and carrier wave signals.
While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative and not restrictive of the current invention, and that this invention is not restricted to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described since modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/256,961, filed on Dec. 29, 2020, which is a National Phase of International Patent Application No: PCT/US2019/040324, filed on Jul. 2, 2019, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/693,228, filed on Jul. 2, 2018, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4344092 | Miller | Aug 1982 | A |
4652930 | Crawford | Mar 1987 | A |
4810080 | Grendol et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4997268 | Dauvergne | Mar 1991 | A |
5007727 | Kahaney et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5074295 | Willis | Dec 1991 | A |
5240220 | Elberbaum | Aug 1993 | A |
5251635 | Dumoulin et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5410763 | Bolle | May 1995 | A |
5455625 | Englander | Oct 1995 | A |
5495286 | Adair | Feb 1996 | A |
5497463 | Stein et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5659701 | Amit et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682255 | Friesem et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689669 | Lynch | Nov 1997 | A |
5826092 | Flannery | Oct 1998 | A |
5854872 | Tai | Dec 1998 | A |
5864365 | Sramek et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5937202 | Crosetto | Aug 1999 | A |
6002853 | de Hond | Dec 1999 | A |
6012811 | Chao et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016160 | Coombs et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6064749 | Hirota et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076927 | Owens | Jun 2000 | A |
6079982 | Meader | Jun 2000 | A |
6117923 | Amagai et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119147 | Toomey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6124977 | Takahashi | Sep 2000 | A |
6179619 | Tanaka | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191809 | Hori et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219045 | Leahy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243091 | Berstis | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6271843 | Lection et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6362817 | Powers et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375369 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385735 | Wilson | May 2002 | B1 |
6396522 | Vu | May 2002 | B1 |
6414679 | Miodonski et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6538655 | Kubota | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541736 | Huang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570563 | Honda | May 2003 | B1 |
6573903 | Gantt | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6590593 | Robertson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6621508 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6690393 | Heron et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6757068 | Foxlin | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6784901 | Harvfey et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6961055 | Doak | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7046515 | Wyatt | May 2006 | B1 |
7051219 | Hwang | May 2006 | B2 |
7076674 | Cervantes | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7111290 | Yates, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119819 | Robertson et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7219245 | Raghuvanshi | May 2007 | B1 |
7382288 | Wilson | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7414629 | Santodomingo | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7431453 | Hogan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7467356 | Gettman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7542040 | Templeman | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573640 | Nivon et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7653877 | Matsuda | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7663625 | Chartier et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7724980 | Shenzhi | May 2010 | B1 |
7746343 | Charaniya et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7751662 | Kleemann | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758185 | Lewis | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788323 | Greenstein et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804507 | Yang et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814429 | Buffet et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817150 | Reichard et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7844724 | Van Wie et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8060759 | Arnan et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8120851 | Iwasa | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8214660 | Capps, Jr. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8246408 | Elliot | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8353594 | Lewis | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8360578 | Nummela et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8508676 | Silverstein et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8547638 | Levola | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8605764 | Rothaar | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8619365 | Harris et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8696113 | Lewis | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698701 | Margulis | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8733927 | Lewis | May 2014 | B1 |
8736636 | Kang | May 2014 | B2 |
8759929 | Shiozawa et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8793770 | Lim | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8823855 | Hwang | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8847988 | Geisner et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8874673 | Kim | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9010929 | Lewis | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015501 | Gee | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9086537 | Iwasa et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9095437 | Boyden et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9239473 | Lewis | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9244293 | Lewis | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9244533 | Friend et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9383823 | Geisner et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9489027 | Ogletree | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9519305 | Wolfe | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9581820 | Robbins | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9582060 | Balatsos | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9658473 | Lewis | May 2017 | B2 |
9671566 | Abovitz et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9671615 | Vallius et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9696795 | Marcolina et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9798144 | Sako et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9874664 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9880441 | Osterhout | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9918058 | Takahasi et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9955862 | Freeman et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9978118 | Ozgumer et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9996797 | Holz et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10018844 | Levola et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10082865 | Raynal et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10151937 | Lewis | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10185147 | Lewis | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10218679 | Jawahar | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10241545 | Richards et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10317680 | Richards et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10436594 | Belt et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10516853 | Gibson et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10551879 | Richards et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10578870 | Kimmel | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10698202 | Kimmel et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10856107 | Mycek et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10825424 | Zhang | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10987176 | Poltaretskyi et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11190681 | Brook | Nov 2021 | B1 |
11209656 | Choi | Dec 2021 | B1 |
11236993 | Hall | Feb 2022 | B1 |
20010010598 | Aritake et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018667 | Kim | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020007463 | Fung | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020108064 | Nunally | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020063913 | Nakamura et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071050 | Homberg | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095463 | Matsuda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020113820 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122648 | Mule′ et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140848 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030028816 | Bacon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048456 | Hill | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067685 | Niv | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077458 | Korenaga et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080976 | Satoh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115494 | Cervantes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030218614 | Lavelle et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030219992 | Schaper | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226047 | Park | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001533 | Tran et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021600 | Wittenberg | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040025069 | Gary et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042377 | Nikoloai et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073822 | Greco | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073825 | Itoh | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111248 | Granny et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113887 | Pair et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040174496 | Ji et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186902 | Stewart | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193441 | Altieri | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201857 | Foxlin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040238732 | State et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040240072 | Schindler et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040246391 | Travis | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268159 | Aasheim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001977 | Zelman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050034002 | Flautner | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050093719 | Okamoto et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128212 | Edecker et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050157159 | Komiya et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177385 | Hull | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050231599 | Yamasaki | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273792 | Inohara et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013435 | Rhoads | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015821 | Jacques Parker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019723 | Vorenkamp | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060038880 | Starkweather et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050224 | Smith | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060090092 | Verhulst | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060126181 | Levola | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129852 | Bonola | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132914 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179329 | Terechko | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060221448 | Nivon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228073 | Mukawa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250322 | Hall et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259621 | Ranganathan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268220 | Hogan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070058248 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070103836 | Oh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124730 | Pytel | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159673 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070188837 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198886 | Saito | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204672 | Huang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213952 | Cirelli | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070283247 | Brenneman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002259 | Ishizawa et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080002260 | Arrouy et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030429 | Hailpern | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043334 | Itzkovitch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046773 | Ham | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063802 | Maula et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068557 | Menduni et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080125218 | Collins | May 2008 | A1 |
20080146942 | Dala-Krishna | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173036 | Willaims | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177506 | Kim | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183190 | Adcox et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205838 | Crippa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215907 | Wilson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225393 | Rinko | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235570 | Sawada et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080246693 | Hailpern et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080316768 | Travis | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090076791 | Rhoades et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091583 | McCoy | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153797 | Allon et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090224416 | Laakkonen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245730 | Kleemann | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287728 | Martine et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300528 | Stambaugh | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310633 | Ikegami | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005326 | Archer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019962 | Fujita | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100056274 | Uusitalo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063854 | Purvis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070378 | Trotman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079841 | Levola | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115428 | Shuping et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153934 | Lachner | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100194632 | Raento et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205541 | Rappaport et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214284 | Rieffel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232016 | Landa et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232031 | Batchko et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244168 | Shiozawa et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274567 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274627 | Carlson | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277803 | Pockett et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284085 | Laakkonen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287485 | Bertolami et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296163 | Sarikko | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309687 | Sampsell et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110010636 | Hamilton, II et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021263 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022870 | Mcgrane | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110041083 | Gabai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050640 | Lundback et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050655 | Mukawa | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064268 | Cobb et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110122240 | Becker | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145617 | Thomson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170801 | Lu et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110218733 | Hamza et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110286735 | Temblay | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291969 | Rashid et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011389 | Driesen | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120050535 | Densham et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075501 | Oyagi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081392 | Arthur | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120089854 | Breakstone | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113235 | Shintani | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127062 | Bar-Zeev et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120154557 | Perez et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120215094 | Rahimian et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218301 | Miller | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120246506 | Knight | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249416 | Maciocci et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249741 | Maciocci et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260083 | Andrews | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120307075 | Margalitq | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120307362 | Silverstein et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314959 | White et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120320460 | Levola | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326948 | Crocco et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130021486 | Richardon | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130050258 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050642 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050833 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051730 | Travers et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130061240 | Yan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077049 | Bohn | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077170 | Ukuda | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130094148 | Sloane | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130129282 | Li | May 2013 | A1 |
20130162940 | Kurtin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169923 | Schnoll et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130205126 | Kruglick | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222386 | Tannhauser et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268257 | Hu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278633 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130314789 | Saarikko et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318276 | Dalal | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336138 | Venkatraman et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342564 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342570 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342571 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343408 | Cook | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002329 | Nishimaki et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013098 | Yeung | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140016821 | Arth et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140022819 | Oh et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140078023 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082526 | Park et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140119598 | Ramachandran et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126769 | Reitmayr et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140653 | Brown et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149573 | Tofighbakhsh et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140168260 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140244983 | McDonald et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140266987 | Magyari | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267419 | Ballard et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274391 | Stafford | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282105 | Nordstrom | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292645 | Tsurumi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313228 | Kasahara | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140340498 | Plagemann et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359589 | Kodsky et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140375680 | Ackerman et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005785 | Olson | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009099 | Queen | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150077312 | Wang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097719 | Balachandreswaran | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150123966 | Newman | May 2015 | A1 |
20150130790 | Vazquez, II et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150134995 | Park et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138248 | Schrader | May 2015 | A1 |
20150155939 | Oshima et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150168221 | Mao et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150205126 | Schowengerdt | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150235427 | Nobori et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150235431 | Schowengerdt | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150253651 | Russell et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256484 | Cameron | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150269784 | Miyawaki et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150294483 | Wells et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150301955 | Yakovenko et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310657 | Eden | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150338915 | Publicover et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355481 | Hilkes et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160004102 | Nisper et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160015470 | Border | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027215 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160033770 | Fujimaki et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160051217 | Douglas et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160077338 | Robbins et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160085285 | Mangione-Smith | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160085300 | Robbins et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160091720 | Stafford et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160093099 | Bridges | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160093269 | Buckley | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160103326 | Kimura et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160123745 | Cotier et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160139402 | Lapstun | May 2016 | A1 |
20160139411 | Kang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160155273 | Lyren et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180596 | Gonzalez del Rosario | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187654 | Border et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191887 | Casas | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160202496 | Billetz et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217624 | Finn et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160266412 | Yoshida | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160267708 | Nistico et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160274733 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287337 | Aram et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160300388 | Stafford et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160321551 | Priness et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327798 | Xiao et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334279 | Mittleman et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160357255 | Lindh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160370404 | Quadrat et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160370510 | Thomas | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170038607 | Camara | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170060225 | Zha et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170061696 | Li et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170064066 | Das et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170100664 | Osterhout et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170102544 | Vallius et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170115487 | Travis | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170122725 | Yeoh et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170123526 | Trail et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170127295 | Black et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170131569 | Aschwanden et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170147066 | Katz et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170160518 | Lanman et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170161951 | Fix et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170185261 | Perez et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192239 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170201709 | Igarashi et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170205903 | Miller et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206668 | Poulos et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170213388 | Margolis et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214907 | Lapstun | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219841 | Popovich et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170232345 | Rofougaran et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170235126 | DiDomenico | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170235129 | Kamakura | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170235142 | Wall et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170235144 | Piskunov et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170235147 | Kamakura | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243403 | Daniels et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170246070 | Osterhout et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170254832 | Ho et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170256096 | Faaborg et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170258526 | Lang | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170266529 | Reikmoto | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170270712 | Tyson et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170281054 | Stever et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170287376 | Bakar et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170293141 | Schowengerdt et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170307886 | Stenberg et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170307891 | Bucknor et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170312032 | Amanatullah et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322418 | Liu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322426 | Tervo | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170329137 | Tervo | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170332098 | Rusanovskyy et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170336636 | Amitai et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170357332 | Balan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170363871 | Vallius | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170371394 | Chan | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170371661 | Sparling | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180014266 | Chen | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180024289 | Fattal | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180044173 | Netzer | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180052007 | Teskey et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180052501 | Jones, Jr. et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180059305 | Popovich et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180067779 | Pillalamarri et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180070855 | Eichler | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082480 | White et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180084245 | Lapstun | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180088185 | Woods et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180102981 | Kurtzman et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180108179 | Tomlin et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114298 | Malaika et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180129112 | Osterhout | May 2018 | A1 |
20180131907 | Schmirler et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180136466 | Ko | May 2018 | A1 |
20180144691 | Choi et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180150971 | Adachi et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180151796 | Akahane | May 2018 | A1 |
20180172995 | Lee et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180188115 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180189568 | Powderly et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190017 | Mendez et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180191990 | Motoyama et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180217395 | Lin et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180218545 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250589 | Cossairt et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180260218 | Gopal | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180284877 | Klein | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180292654 | Wall et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180299678 | Singer et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180357472 | Dreessen | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190005069 | Filgueiras de Araujo et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190011691 | Peyman | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190056591 | Tervo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190087015 | Lam et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190101758 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190107723 | Lee et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190137788 | Suen | May 2019 | A1 |
20190155034 | Singer et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190155439 | Mukherjee et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190158926 | Kang | May 2019 | A1 |
20190162950 | Lapstun | May 2019 | A1 |
20190167095 | Krueger | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190172216 | Ninan et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190178654 | Hare | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190182415 | Sivan | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190196690 | Chong et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190206116 | Xu et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190219815 | Price | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190243123 | Bohn | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190287270 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190318502 | He et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190318540 | Piemonte et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190321728 | Imai et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190347853 | Chen et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190380792 | Poltaretskyi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190388182 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200066045 | Stahl et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200098188 | Bar-Zeev et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200100057 | Galon et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200110928 | Al Jazaery et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200117267 | Gibson et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200117270 | Gibson et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200184217 | Faulkner | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200184653 | Faulker | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200202759 | Ukai | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200242848 | Ambler et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200309944 | Thoresen et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200356161 | Wagner | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200368616 | Delamont | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200391115 | Leeper et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200409528 | Lee | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210008413 | Asikainen et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210033871 | Jacoby et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210041951 | Gibson et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210053820 | Gurin et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210093391 | Poltaretskyi et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210093410 | Gaborit et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210093414 | Moore et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210097886 | Kuester et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210124901 | Liu et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210132380 | Wieczorek | May 2021 | A1 |
20210141225 | Meynen et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210142582 | Jones et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210158023 | Fu et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210158627 | Cossairt et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210173480 | Osterhout | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20220366598 | Azimi et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100416340 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101449270 | Jun 2009 | CN |
103460255 | Dec 2013 | CN |
104040410 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104603675 | May 2015 | CN |
105938426 | Sep 2016 | CN |
106662754 | May 2017 | CN |
107683497 | Feb 2018 | CN |
109223121 | Jan 2019 | CN |
105190427 | Nov 2019 | CN |
0504930 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0535402 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0632360 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1215522 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1494110 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1938141 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1943556 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2290428 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2350774 | Aug 2011 | EP |
1237067 | Jan 2016 | EP |
3139245 | Mar 2017 | EP |
3164776 | May 2017 | EP |
3236211 | Oct 2017 | EP |
2723240 | Aug 2018 | EP |
2896986 | Feb 2021 | EP |
2499635 | Aug 2013 | GB |
2542853 | Apr 2017 | GB |
938DEL2004 | Jun 2006 | IN |
H03-036974 | Apr 1991 | JP |
H10-333094 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2002-529806 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-029198 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-141574 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-228027 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-329873 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2005-303843 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007-012530 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-86696 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-273733 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008-257127 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2009-090689 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009-244869 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010-014443 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2010-139575 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2011-033993 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011-257203 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2011-530131 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-015774 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-235036 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2013-525872 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2013-206322 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2014-500522 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-192550 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2015-191032 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2016-502120 | Jan 2016 | JP |
2016-85463 | May 2016 | JP |
2016-516227 | Jun 2016 | JP |
2016-126134 | Jul 2016 | JP |
2017-015697 | Jan 2017 | JP |
2017-153498 | Sep 2017 | JP |
2017-531840 | Oct 2017 | JP |
2017-535825 | Nov 2017 | JP |
6232763 | Nov 2017 | JP |
6333965 | May 2018 | JP |
2005-0010775 | Jan 2005 | KR |
10-2006-0059992 | Jun 2006 | KR |
10-2011-0006408 | Jan 2011 | KR |
10-1372623 | Mar 2014 | KR |
10-2017-0017243 | Feb 2017 | KR |
201219829 | May 2012 | TW |
201803289 | Jan 2018 | TW |
1991000565 | Jan 1991 | WO |
2000030368 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2002071315 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2004095248 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2006132614 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007041678 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007037089 | May 2007 | WO |
2007085682 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007102144 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008148927 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009101238 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010015807 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2014203440 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2012030787 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2013049012 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013062701 | May 2013 | WO |
2013145536 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014033306 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015079610 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015143641 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015143641 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015194597 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016054092 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2017004695 | Jan 2017 | WO |
2017044761 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017049163 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017051595 | Mar 2017 | WO |
2017120475 | Jul 2017 | WO |
2017176861 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2017203201 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017203201 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018008232 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018031261 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018022523 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018044537 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018039273 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018057564 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018085287 | May 2018 | WO |
2018087408 | May 2018 | WO |
2018097831 | May 2018 | WO |
2018166921 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018166921 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018236587 | Dec 2018 | WO |
2019040493 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019148154 | Aug 2019 | WO |
2020010226 | Jan 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“ARToolKit: Hardware”, https://web.archive.org/web/20051013062315/http://www.hitl.washington.edu:80/artoolkit/documentation/hardware.htm (downloaded Oct. 26, 2020), Oct. 13, 2015, (3 pages). |
“Communication according to Rule 164(1) EPC dated Feb. 23, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20753144.3 , (11 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Sep. 4, 2019”, European Patent Application No. 10793707.0 , (4 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 25, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 18885707.2 , (5 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jan. 4, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20154070.5 , (8 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated May 30, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19768418.6 , (6 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 21, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 16207441.3 , (4 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Rule 164(1) EPC dated Jul. 27, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19833664.6 , (11 pages). |
“European Search Report dated Oct. 15, 2020”, European Patent Application No. 20180623.9 , (10 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated May 20, 2020”, European Patent Application No. 20154070.5 , (7 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 22, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 18890390.0 , (11 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2020”, European Patent Application No. 18885707.2 , (7 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 30, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19811971.1 , (9 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19768418.6 , (9 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2020”, European Patent Application No. 20190980.1 , (14 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 24, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20846338.0 , (13 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 8, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19898874.3 , (8 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 8, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20798769.4 , (13 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20770244.0 , (23 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 12, 2017”, European Patent Application No. 16207441.3 , (8 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19815876.8 , (9 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 4, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19815085.6 , (9 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 16, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19810142.0 , (14 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19839970.1 , (7 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 19, 2020”, European Patent Application No. 20154750.2 , (10 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 22, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19843487.0 , (14 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated May 16, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19871001.4 , (9 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated May 30, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20753144.3 , (10 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 27, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19833664.6 , (10 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 20, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19851373.1 , (8 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 28, 2021”, European Patent Application No. 19845418.3 , (13 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/225,961 , (13 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2019”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/564,517 , (15 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Feb. 19, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/552,897 , (17 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/748,193 , (23 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/864,721 , (36 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/262,991 , (18 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/928,313 , (42 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,575 , (29 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/530,776 , (25 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/435,933 , (44 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,782 , (44 pages). |
“First Examination Report dated Jul. 27, 2022”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980036675.2 , (5 pages). |
“First Examination Report dated Jul. 28, 2022”, Indian Patent Application No. 202047024232 , (6 pages). |
“First Examination Report dated May 13, 2022”, Indian Patent Application No. 202047026359 , (8 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2022 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880079474.6 , (11 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2022 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980063642.7 , (7 pages). |
“FS_XR5G: Permanent document, v0.4.0”, Qualcomm Incorporated, 3GPP TSG-SA 4 Meeting 103 retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Meetings%5F3GPP%5FSYNC/SA4/Docs/S4%2DI90526%2Ezip [retrieved on Apr. 12, 2019] , Apr. 12, 2019 , (98 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 12, 2021”, International Application No. PCT/US20/60555 , (25 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 12, 2020”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/67919 , (14 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/33987 , (20 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 15, 2020”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/017023 , (13 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43097 , (10 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/36275 , (10 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 16, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43099 , (9 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 17, 2016”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/FI2016/050172 , (9 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2021”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US20/60550 , (9 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 22, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43751 , (9 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 23, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/44953 , (11 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 23, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US18/66514 , (17 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/40544 , (12 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2019”, International PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/035245 , (8 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 27, 2019”, International Application No. PCT/US19/47746 , (16 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 3, 2020”, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/43596 , (25 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 30, 2019”, International Patent Application No. PCT/US19/40324 , (7 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 4, 2020”, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/31036 , (13 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2020”, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/19871 , (9 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/034763 , (8 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/41151 , (7 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 9, 2020”, International Application No. PCT/US19/55185 , (10 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2019”, International Patent Application No. PCT/US18/64686 , (8 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 7, 2020”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/061265 , (11 pages). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 11, 2019”, International PCT Application No. PCT/US19/22620 , (7 pages). |
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Aug. 15, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/36275 , (2 pages). |
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Sep. 24, 2020”, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/043596 , (3 pages). |
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Oct. 22, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/47746 , (2 pages). |
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Apr. 3, 2020”, International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/17023 , (2 pages). |
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Oct. 17, 2019”, International PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/44953 , (2 pages). |
“Multi-core processor”, TechTarget , 2013 , (1 page). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/256,961 , (65 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,782 , (52 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/262,991 , (60 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2019”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/564,517 , (14 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/864,721 , (21 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/357,795 , (63 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,866 , (8 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/928,313 , (33 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/225,961 , (15 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 26, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/098,059 , (28 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/435,933 , (16 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/002,663 , (43 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/833,093 , (47 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,782 , (40 Pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/682,911 , (22 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/225,961 , (35 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,588 , (58 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,337 , (41 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/257,814 , (60 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/870,676 (57 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated May 10, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/140,921 , (25 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated May 17, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/748,193 (11 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated May 26, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,575 , (19 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/530,776 , (45 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/214,575 , (40 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/263,001 , (14 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/105,848 , (56 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2021”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/748,193 , (62 pages). |
“Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 25, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/564,517 , (11 pages). |
“Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 5, 2020”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/682,911 , (27 pages). |
“Notice of Reason for Rejection dated Oct. 28, 2022 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-531452 , (3 pages). |
“Notice of Reason of Refusal dated Sep. 11, 2020 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-140435 , (6 pages). |
“Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2022 with English Translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-533730 , (11 pages). |
“Phototourism Challenge”, CVPR 2019 Image Matching Workshop. https://image matching-workshop. github.io. , (16 pages). |
“Second Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2022 with English Translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880079474.6 , (10 pages). |
“Second Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2022 with English Translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880089255.6 , (14 pages). |
“Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC mailed on Jul. 15, 2019”, European Patent Application No. 15162521.7 , (7 pages). |
Aarik, J. , et al. , “Effect of crystal structure on optical properties of TiO2 films grown by atomic layer deposition”, Thin Solid Films; Publication [online). May 19, 1998 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040609097001351 ?via%3Dihub>; DOI: 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00135-1; see entire document , (2 pages). |
Altwaijry , et al. , “Learning to Detect and Match Keypoints with Deep Architectures”, Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), BMVA Press, Sep. 2016, [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 (Jan. 1, 2021 )] < URL: http://www.bmva.org/bmvc/2016/papers/paper049/index.html >, en lire document, especially Abstract. |
Anonymous , “Koi Pond: Top iPhone App Store Paid App”, https://web.archive.org/web/20080904061233/https://www.iphoneincanada.ca/reviews /koi-pond-top-iphone-app-store-paid-app/—[retrieved on Aug. 9, 2022]. |
Arandjelović, Relja , et al. , “Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval”, CVPR, 2012 , (8 pages). |
AZOM , “Silica—Silicon Dioxide (SiO2)” , AZO Materials; Publication [Online]. Dec. 13, 2001 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?Article1D=1114>. |
Azuma, Ronald T. , “A Survey of Augmented Reality”, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4 (Aug. 1997), 355-385; https://web.archive.org/web/20010604100006/http://www.cs.unc.edu/˜azuma/ARpresence.pdf (downloaded Oct. 26, 2020). |
Azuma, Ronald T. , “Predictive Tracking for Augmented Reality”, Department of Computer Science, Chapel Hill NC; TR95-007, Feb. 1995 , 262 pages. |
Battaglia, Peter W, et al. , “Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks”, arXiv:1806.01261, Oct. 17, 2018 , pp. 1-40. |
Berg, Alexander C , et al. , “Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondences”, In CVPR, 2005 , (8 pages). |
Bian, Jiawang , et al. , “GMS: Grid-based motion statistics for fast, ultra-robust feature correspondence.”, In CVPR (Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), 2017 , (10 pages). |
Bimber, Oliver , et al. , “Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds”, https://web.media.mit.edu/˜raskar/book/BimberRaskarAugmentedRealityBook.pdf; published by A K Peters/CRC Press (Jul. 31, 2005); eBook (3rd Edition, 2007) , (393 pages). |
Brachmann, Eric , et al. , “Neural-Guided RANSAC: Learning Where to Sample Model Hypotheses”, In ICCV (International Conference on Computer Vision ), arXiv:1905.04132v2 [cs.CV] Jul. 31, 2019 , (17 pages). |
Butail , et al. , “Putting the fish in the fish tank: Immersive VR for animal behavior experiments”, In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. May 18, 2012 (May 18, 2012) Retrieved on Nov. 14, 2020 (Nov. 14, 2020) from <http:/lcdcl.umd.edu/papers/icra2012.pdf> entire document. |
Caetano, Tibério S , et al. , “Learning graph matching”, IEEE TPAMI, 31(6):1048-1058, 2009. |
Cech, Jan , et al. , “Efficient sequential correspondence selection by cosegmentation”, IEEE TPAMI, 32(9):1568-1581, Sep. 2010. |
Chittineni, C. , et al. , “Single filters for combined image geometric manipulation and enhancement”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 1903, Image and Video Processing, Apr. 8, 1993, San Jose, CA. (Year: 1993) , pp. 111-121. |
Cuturi, Marco , “Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport”, NIPS, 2013 , (9 pages). |
Dai, Angela , et al. , “ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes”, In CVPR, arXiv:1702.04405v2 [cs.CV] Apr. 11, 2017 , (22 pages). |
Deng, Haowen , et al. , “PPFnet: Global context aware local features for robust 3d point matching”, In CVPR, arXiv:1802.02669v2 [cs.CV] Mar. 1, 2018 , (12 pages). |
Detone, Daniel , et al. , “Deep image homography estimation”, In RSS Work-shop: Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning in Robotics, arXiv:1606.03798v1 [cs.CV] Jun. 13, 2016 , (6 pages). |
Detone, Daniel , et al. , “Self-improving visual odometry”, arXiv:1812.03245, Dec. 8, 2018 , (9 pages). |
Detone, Daniel , et al. , “SuperPoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description”, In CVPR Workshop on Deep Learning for Visual SLAM, arXiv:1712.07629v4 [cs.CV] Apr. 19, 2018 , (13 pages). |
Dusmanu, Mihai , et al. , “D2-net: A trainable CNN for joint detection and description of local features”, CVPR, arXiv:1905.03561v1 [cs.CV] May 9, 2019 , (16 pages). |
Ebel, Patrick , et al. , “Beyond cartesian representations for local descriptors”, ICCV, arXiv:1908.05547v1 [cs.CV] Aug. 15, 2019 , (11 pages). |
Fischler, Martin A , et al. , “Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography”, Communications of the ACM, 24(6): 1981 , pp. 381-395. |
Gilmer, Justin , et al. , “Neural message passing for quantum chemistry”, In ICML, arXiv:1704.01212v2 [cs.LG] Jun. 12, 2017 , (14 pages). |
Giuseppe, Donato , et al. , “Stereoscopic helmet mounted system for real time 3D environment reconstruction and indoor ego—motion estimation”, Proc. SPIE 6955, Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XIII: Design and Applications, SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, 2008, Orlando, Florida, United States , 69550P. |
Goodfellow , “Titanium Dioxide—Titania (TiO2)” , AZO Materials; Publication [online]. Jan. 11, 2002 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?Article1D=1179>. |
Hartley, Richard , et al. , “Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision”, Cambridge University Press, 2003 , pp. 1-673. |
Jacob, Robert J.K. , “Eye Tracking in Advanced Interface Design”, Human-Computer Interaction Lab, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., date unknown. 2003 , pp. 1-50. |
Lee , et al. , “Self-Attention Graph Pooling”, Cornell University Library/Computer Science/ Machine Learning, Apr. 17, 2019 [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 from the Internet< URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08082 >, entire document. |
Lee, Juho , et al. , “Set transformer: A frame-work for attention-based permutation-invariant neural networks”, ICML, arXiv:1810.00825v3 [cs.LG] May 26, 2019 , (17 pages). |
Leordeanu, Marius , et al. , “A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints”, Proceedings of (ICCV) International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1482-1489, Oct. 2005 , (8 pages). |
Levola, T. , “Diffractive Optics for Virtual Reality Displays”, Journal of the SID Eurodisplay 14/05, 2005, XP008093627, chapters 2-3, Figures 2 and 10 , pp. 467-475. |
Levola, Tapani , “Invited Paper: Novel Diffractive Optical Components for Near to Eye Displays—Nokia Research Center”, SID 2006 Digest, 2006 SID International Symposium, Society for Information Display, vol. XXXVII, May 24, 2005, chapters 1-3, figures 1 and 3 , pp. 64-67. |
Li, Yujia , et al. , “Graph matching networks for learning the similarity of graph structured objects”, ICML, arXiv:1904.12787v2 [cs.LG] May 12, 2019 , (18 pages). |
Li, Zhengqi , et al. , “Megadepth: Learning single- view depth prediction from internet photos”, In CVPR, fromarXiv: 1804.00607v4 [cs.CV] Nov. 28, 2018 , (10 pages). |
Libovicky , et al. , “Input Combination Strategies for Multi-Source Transformer Decoder”, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation (WMT). vol. 1: Research Papers, Belgium, Brussels, Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 2018; retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 (Jan. 8, 2021 ) from < URL: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-64026 >, entire document. |
Loiola, Eliane Maria, et al. , “A survey for the quadratic assignment problem”, European journal of operational research, 176(2): 2007 , pp. 657-690. |
Lowe, David G , “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2): 91-110, 2004 , (28 pages). |
Luo, Zixin , et al. , “ContextDesc: Local descriptor augmentation with cross-modality context”, CVPR, arXiv:1904.04084v1 [cs.CV] Apr. 8, 2019 , (14 pages). |
Memon, F. , et al. , “Synthesis, Characterization and Optical Constants of Silicon Oxycarbide”, EPJ Web of Conferences; Publication [online). Mar. 23, 2017 [retrieved Feb. 19, 2020).<URL: https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/08/epjconf_nanop2017 _00002.pdf>; DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201713900002 , (8 pages). |
Molchanov, Pavlo , et al. , “Short-range FMCW monopulse radar for hand-gesture sensing”, 2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon) (2015) , pp. 1491-1496. |
Mrad , et al. , “A framework for System Level Low Power Design Space Exploration”, 1991. |
Munkres, James , “Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems”, Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 5(1): 1957 , pp. 32-38. |
Ono, Yuki , et al. , “LF-Net: Learning local features from images”, 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2018), arXiv:1805.09662v2 [cs.CV] Nov. 22, 2018 , (13 pages). |
Paszke, Adam , et al. , “Automatic differentiation in Pytorch”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA , (4 pages). |
Peyré, Gabriel , et al. , “Computational Optimal Transport”, Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 11(5-6):355-607, 2019; arXiv:1803.00567v4 [stat.ML] Mar. 18, 2020 , (209 pages). |
Qi, Charles Ruizhongtai, et al. , “Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space.”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA., Jun. 7, 2017 , (10 pages). |
Qi, Charles R , et al. , “Pointnet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation”, CVPR, arXiv:1612.00593v2 [cs.CV] Apr. 10, 2017 , (19 pages). |
Radenović, Filip , et al. , “Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarking”, CVPR, arXiv:1803.11285v1 [cs.CV] Mar. 29, 2018 , (10 pages). |
Raguram, Rahul , et al. , “A comparative analysis of ransac techniques leading to adaptive real-time random sample consensus”, Computer Vision—ECCV 2008, 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, Oct. 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part I , (15 pages). |
Ranftl, René , et al. , “Deep fundamental matrix estimation”, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018 , (17 pages). |
Revaud, Jerome , et al. , “R2D2: Repeatable and Reliable Detector and Descriptor”, In NeurIPS, arXiv:1906.06195v2 [cs.CV] Jun. 17, 2019 , (12 pages). |
Rocco, Ignacio , et al. , “Neighbourhood Consensus Networks”, 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2018), Montréal, Canada, arXiv:1810.10510v2 [cs.CV] Nov. 29, 2018 , (20 pages). |
Rublee, Ethan , et al. , “ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2564-2571. 2011; 10.1109/ICCV.2011.612654 , (9 pages). |
Sarlin , et al. , “SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networks”, Cornell University Library/Computer Science/ Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nov. 26, 2019 [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2021 from the Internet< URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11763 >, entire document. |
Sattler, Torsten , et al. , “SCRAMSAC: Improving RANSAC's efficiency with a spatial consistency filter”, ICCV, 2009: 2090-2097. , (8 pages). |
Schonberger, Johannes Lutz, et al. , “Pixelwise view selection for un-structured multi-view stereo”, Computer Vision—ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Oct. 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part III, pp. 501-518, 2016. |
Schonberger, Johannes Lutz, et al. , “Structure-from-motion revisited”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 4104-4113 , (11 pages). |
Sheng, Liu , et al. , “Time-multiplexed dual-focal plane head-mounted display with a liquid lens”, Optics Letters, Optical Society of Amer i ca, US, vol. 34, No. 11, Jun. 1, 2009 (Jun. 1, 2009), XP001524475, ISSN: 0146-9592 , pp. 1642-1644. |
Sinkhorn, Richard , et al. , “Concerning nonnegative matrices and doubly stochastic matrices.”, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 1967 , pp. 343-348. |
Spencer, T. , et al. , “Decomposition of poly(propylene carbonate) with UV sensitive iodonium 11 salts”, Polymer Degradation and Stability; (online]. Dec. 24, 2010 (retrieved Feb. 19, 2020]. , (17 pages). |
Tanriverdi, Vildan , et al. , “Interacting With Eye Movements in Virtual Environments”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Tufts University; Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 2000 , pp. 1-8. |
Thomee, Bart , et al. , “YFCC100m: The new data in multimedia research”, Communications of the ACM, 59(2):64-73, 2016; arXiv:1503.01817v2 [cs.MM] Apr. 25, 2016 , (8 pages). |
Torresani, Lorenzo , et al. , “Feature correspondence via graph matching: Models and global optimization”, Computer Vision—ECCV 2008, 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, Oct. 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part II , (15 pages). |
Tuytelaars, Tinne , et al. , “Wide baseline stereo matching based on local, affinely invariant regions”, BMVC, 2000 , pp. 1-14. |
Ulyanov, Dmitry , et al. , “Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization”, arXiv:1607.08022v3 [cs.CV] Nov. 6, 2017 , (6 pages). |
Vaswani, Ashish , et al. , “Attention is all you need”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA; arXiv:1706.03762v5 [cs.CL] Dec. 6, 2017 , (15 pages). |
Veli{hacek over (c)}kovi{hacek over (c)}, Petar , et al. , “Graph attention networks”, ICLR, arXiv:1710.10903v3 [stat.ML] Feb. 4, 2018 , (12 pages). |
Villani, Cédric , “Optimal transport: old and new”, vol. 338. Springer Science & Business Media, Jun. 2008 , pp. 1-998. |
Wang, Xiaolong , et al. , “Non-local neural networks”, CVPR, arXiv:1711.07971v3 [cs.CV] Apr. 13, 2018 , (10 pages). |
Wang, Yue , et al. , “Deep Closest Point: Learning representations for point cloud registration”, ICCV, arXiv:1905.03304v1 [cs.CV] May 8, 2019 , (10 pages). |
Wang, Yue , et al. , “Dynamic Graph CNN for learning on point clouds”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, arXiv:1801.07829v2 [cs.CV] Jun. 11, 2019 , (13 pages). |
Weissel , et al. , “Process cruise control: event-driven clock scaling for dynamic power management”, Proceedings of the 2002 international conference on Compilers, architecture, and synthesis for embedded systems. Oct. 11, 2002 (Oct. 11, 2002) Retrieved on May 16, 2020 (May 16, 2020) from <URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/581630.581668>. |
Yi, Kwang Moo, et al. , “Learning to find good correspondences”, CVPR, arXiv:1711.05971v2 [cs.CV] May 21, 2018 , (13 pages). |
Yi, Kwang Moo , et al. , “Lift: Learned invariant feature transform”, ECCV, arXiv:1603.09114v2 [cs.CV] Jul. 29, 2016 , (16 pages). |
Zaheer, Manzil , et al. , “Deep Sets”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA; arXiv:1703.06114v3 [cs.LG] Apr. 14, 2018 , (29 pages). |
Zhang, Jiahui , et al. , “Learning two-view correspondences and geometry using order-aware network”, ICCV; aarXiv:1908.04964v1 [cs.CV] Aug. 14, 2019 , (11 pages). |
Zhang, Li , et al. , “Dual graph convolutional net-work for semantic segmentation”, BMVC, 2019; arXiv:1909.06121v3 [cs.CV] Aug. 26, 2020 , (18 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 14, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20886547.7, (8 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 19885958.9, (9 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2022”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/098,059, (32 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2022 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880089255.6, (17 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/429,100, (16 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,965, (32 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/497,940, (10 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Feb. 28, 2023”, European Patent Application No. 19845418.3 , (6 Pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Jul. 28, 2023”, European Patent Application No. 19843487.0 , (15 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated May 23, 2023”, European Patent Application No. 18890390.0 , (5 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 6, 2023”, European Patent Application No. 19851373.1 , (6 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Rule 164(1) EPC dated Feb. 23, 2022”, European Patent Application No. 20753144.3 , (11 pages). |
“Decision of Rejection dated Jan. 5, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201880079474.6 , (10 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 8, 2024”, European Patent Application No. 23195266.4 , (8 pages). |
“Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 5, 2023”, European Patent Application No. 20888716.6 , (11 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/098,043 , (7 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/357,795 , (18 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/357,795 , (15 pages). |
“Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-566620 , (18 pages). |
“First Examination Report dated Aug. 8, 2023”, Australian Patent Application No. 2018379105 , (3 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-509779 , (26 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-545712 , (8 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Jul. 4, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-505669 , (6 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980090867.1 , (16 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2023 with English Translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-567766 , (7 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2022 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980061450.2 , (11 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-549034 , (7 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980082951.9 , (5 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-567853 , (7 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-566617 , (6 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2023 with English translation”, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7019685 , (7 pages). |
“First Office Action dated May 26, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-500607 , (6 pages). |
“First Office Action dated May 30, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-519873 , (8 pages). |
“First Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2023-10887 , (5 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 19. 2019”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/355,611 , (31 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/098,043 , (7 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/807,600 , (25 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/650,188 , (11 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/516,483 , (10 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/046,739 , (34 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated May 11, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/822,279 , (24 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/268,376 , (8 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/416,248 , (17 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2023”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/259,020 , (21 pages). |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 27, 2023 with English translation”, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7019685 , (4 pages). |
“Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2023 with English Translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-535716 , (15 pages). |
“Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-533730 , (13 pages). |
“Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-526564 , (13 pages). |
“Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-505884 , (6 pages). |
“Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-503762 , (6 pages). |
“Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-566620 , (10 pages). |
“Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2023 with English translation”, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2023-7036734 , (5 pages). |
“Penultimate Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-509779 , (5 pages). |
“Second Office Action dated May 2, 2023 with English Translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-549034 , (6 pages). |
“Second Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2023 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-567853 , (8 pages). |
“Wikipedia Dioptre”, Jun. 22, 2018 (Jun. 22, 2018), XP093066995, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Dioptre&direction=next&oldid=846451540 [retrieved on Jul. 25, 2023] , (3 pages). |
Li, Yujia , et al. , “Graph Matching Networks for Learning the Similarity of Graph Structured Objects”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, XP081268608. |
Luo, Zixin , et al. , “ContextDesc: Local Descriptor Augmentation With Cross-Modality Context”, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, XP033686823, DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00263 [retrieved on Jan. 8, 2020] , pp. 2522-2531. |
Zhang, Zen , et al. , “Deep Graphical Feature Learning for the Feature Matching Problem”, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), IEEE, XP033723985, DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00519 [retrieved on Feb. 24, 2020] , pp. 5086-5095. |
“First Office Action mailed Dec. 20, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980050600.X, (21 pages). |
“First Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980075942.7, (7 pages). |
“Office Action mailed on Nov. 8, 2023 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980060018.1, (12 pages). |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed on Feb. 21, 2024”, European Patent Application No. 20770244.0, (8 pages). |
“First Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2024 with English translation”, Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-553297, (5 pages). |
“First Office Action mailed on Feb. 1, 2024 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 202080018865.4, (9 pages). |
“Non Final Office Action mailed on Feb. 26, 2024”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/046,739, (48 pages). |
“Office Action mailed on Feb. 19, 2024 with English translation”, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7020552, (18 pages). |
“Office Action mailed on Feb. 26, 2024 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980069194.1, (11 pages). |
“Office Action mailed on Mar. 6, 2024 with English translation”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201980053016.X, (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230161152 A1 | May 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62693228 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17256961 | US | |
Child | 18151763 | US |