The present invention generally relates to interactive game play. More specifically, the present application relates to placement of user-generated content to aid a user with interactive game play.
Improvements in processing power and graphics quality have led to increasingly complex interactive gaming environments. For example, the PlayStation®3's RSX graphics processor allows for freedom of graphics expression in creating next-generation, real-time 3D imagery. Working in tandem with Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.'s Cell Broadband Engine™ Architecture, RSX processor rendered graphics are unparalleled in quality and realism.
Increasingly complex gaming environments have, in turn, resulted in more complex story lines, game play objectives, missions and tasks, and capabilities associated with game play avatars. As a result, interactive game play has become more challenging even for experienced game players. If a game becomes too challenging, however, game players may forsake future game play out of frustration.
To help game players overcome obstacles or achieve goals in a variety of interactive games, various content providers have begun publishing game magazines. These magazines provide game players with a ‘walk thru’ that tell the reader/game player where to go and what to do in order to ‘win’ the game or obtain the highest possible score. Hints or suggestions with respect to special moves or avatar capabilities may also be described in these gaming magazines.
While these magazines may be informative, they suffer from a number of drawbacks. If the magazine is not published by an official source (e.g., an official partner of the game developer), the magazine may omit essential information. In some instances, an unofficial magazine may publish incorrect information. Incorrect information may also result from the tendency to rush and publish these magazines concurrently with the release of an interactive game title to allow for concurrent purchase—even if the magazine is published by an official source.
Game players may also discover ‘Easter Eggs’ or other secrets during the course of game play. These secrets may not be a part of even an official magazine due to the fact that some game design engineers ‘slip in’ these Easter Eggs without the knowledge of the magazine publisher. Many interactive games also allow for the creation of special moves that may not have initially been conceived of by the game developer. As a result, these special moves are not a part of the game play magazine—official or otherwise—as their development occur after the magazine and associated game has gone to market.
Once game play magazines publish, subsequent editions tend not to be published. The lack of subsequent, updated editions may further the information that may be withheld from game players. Unique game play situations or circumstances may not become apparent until the interactive game is played by a large number of game players. These situations and circumstances may not be addressed in the gaming magazine thereby leaving game players at a loss as to how they may properly address the same.
In contrast, the Internet offers the opportunity for endless publishing and republishing of information. Notwithstanding endless publishing possibilities, websites on the Internet are often decentralized and unorganized. In some instances, there is no ‘official website’ as game developers may wish for game players to purchase a ‘for fee’ official magazine rather than access a free on-line website. Additionally, one website may offer one solution for one particular game play situation whereas another website may offer a solution for another situation. In order for a game player to obtain a complete ‘walk thru’ of a particular interactive game, the user may have to visit multiple websites on the Internet. Since these websites tend to be ‘unofficial,’ there is often an issue with the veracity or accuracy of the information displayed on these websites.
A further lacking in the aforementioned prior art solutions is the fact that this information—regardless of source, thoroughness, or quality—is that the information lacks contextual relevance. Some game play environments include a variety of ‘acts’ or ‘levels’ of game play; these scenes or levels often include a variety of subsidiary ‘scenes’ or ‘stages.’ For example, a game based on the D-Day military offensive may involve four scenes: crossing the English Channel; advancing up Omaha Beach; taking artillery positions at the head of the beach; and securing numerous military objectives in the French countryside. Game play advice concerning how to best maneuver an LCM Landing Craft while crossing the English Channel has no value to the game player that currently needs advice on how to best conduct a room-to-room search in the bombed out buildings of the nearby town of Bayeux. Locating the contextually appropriate game play advice may be time consuming if not confusing to a game player in the ‘heat of battle.’
The aforementioned prior art game play advice solutions are also wanting for lack of real-time provisioning of information. Many of today's interactive games are incredibly realistic, action-intensive simulations such as Warhawk from Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. A game player often finds themselves ‘in the zone’ with respect to game play. If a game player is continually forced to interrupt game play (e.g., ‘pausing’ the game) in order to flip through pages of a game play magazine or click-thru various pages of content on the Internet, the game player will quickly find themselves losing their rhythm. In such complex game play environments, loss of that rhythm may be to the detriment of continued game play regardless of any hints or information that may have been acquired during the interruption.
Many games are also network or community-based with multiple players located around the country or around the world. Such games may occur in real-time. In certain of these games, the interruption of game play through ‘pause’ functionality may not be an option as may be available in a single-player game environment. The game player may be forced to drop out of a particular network game because the gaming environment cannot both exist in a timed-out/paused state for one game player yet continue in real-time for all others.
While some network or community-based games may allow for a ‘pause’ or other ‘time out’ feature, doing so may be to the detriment of the player invoking the interruption. In some games, for example, other game players may continue to advance through the game play environment by obtaining objects of value or reaching objectives within the environment. In other games, competing and non-paused players may position themselves to take retributive action on the ‘paused’ game player when they re-enter the gaming environment. For example, a non-paused player may sneak up behind a ‘paused’ player in a combat environment and assassinate the ‘paused’ player at point-blank range as the ‘paused’ player is unable to observe or react to events in the game environment while in a paused state.
There is a need in the art for game play advice that is complete and up-to-date regardless of when a particular interactive gaming title is released. Further, there is a need for game play advice that is pervasive and easily accessible to game players. There is a still further need for game play advice that is contextually appropriate and provided in real-time when such information is needed most.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a system and methods for placement of user-generated content to aid a user with interactive game play.
A first claimed embodiment of the present invention includes a method for managing user-generated game play advice. An indication of a location within a game space using a virtual coordinate system is received. The location corresponds to the desirability for rendering of game play advice. Game play advice is received from a user and assigned to a location within a game space previously identified as desirous of game play advice by using a virtual coordinate system. Game play advice is then displayed during subsequent game play at the same location within the game space using the virtual coordinate system, the game play advice displayed in a manner that is appropriate with respect to a present context of game play.
A further claimed embodiment of the present invention includes a computer-readable storage medium having embodied thereon a program. The program is executable by a computer to perform a method like that described above.
In a third claimed embodiment, a system for managing user-generated game play advice is described. The system includes a content submission engine for receiving game play advice over a network and a virtual coordinate system engine for assigning the game play advice to a particular location within a game space. A context engine identifies a context of an event during game play. The context of the event corresponds to game play advice associated with the particular location within the game space. A display engine displays game play advice corresponding to the context of the event identified by the context engine and at the location of the event as identified by the virtual coordinate system.
The present invention allows for the generation, association, and display of in-game tags. Such tags introduce an additional dimension of community participation to both single and multiplayer games. Through such tags, players are empowered to communicate through filtered text messages and images as well as audio clips that other game players, including top rated players, have generated and placed at particular coordinates and/or in context of particular events within the game space. The presently described in-game tags and associated user generated content further allow for label based searches with respect to game play.
In this context, the elements identified throughout are exemplary and may include various alternatives, equivalents, or derivations thereof. Various combinations of hardware, software, and computer-executable instructions may be utilized. Program modules and engines may include routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that effectuate the performance of particular tasks when executed by a processor, which may be general purpose or application specific. Computer-executable instructions and associated data structures stored in a computer-readable storage medium represent examples of programming means for executing the steps of the methods and/or implementing particular system configurations disclosed herein.
System 100 may be implemented in a network environment such as the Internet, a proprietary communications environment, or a combination of the two. In one example, system 100 is an integrated component of the PlayStation® Network. System 100 (or components thereof) may communicate with the network environment utilizing any number of network interfaces as are known in the art. Examples of such interfaces include a 1000BASE-T Ethernet port or an IEEE 802.11 b/g network WiFi interface.
System 100 may be implemented in a computing device such as a server dedicated to managing user-generated content including maintenance of various databases. Alternatively, system 100 may be implemented in a computing device hosting a number of applications such as community maintenance, admission, and network game data distribution. System 100 may be dedicated to a single network game, a genre of games, or any number of games having no particular affiliation at all.
System 100 may also be implemented in a distributed peer-to-peer environment. In such an implementation, certain applications and/or responsibilities may be managed by a group of computing devices in the environment.
Various engines may be distributed to a community of users (e.g., players of a particular game or users in a general gaming network) through a push operation from a tasked server in the game community. Alternatively, various engines may be embodied in a computer-readable storage medium that also includes a particular game application (e.g., a disc). Distributed applications and engines may communicate directly via a group of peers or may be administered by a management server.
Content submission engine 110 is executable to allow a user to communicate with the system 100 over network for generation of in-game tags and the corresponding submission of user generated content. In-game tags include custom information placed by a user during game play and can include text messages, web links, images, audio or video clips, and user profile information. In-game tags rely upon virtual space coordinates, which are governed by the virtual spatial coordinate engine 130 and described in further detail below, which allow for consistent positional information pertaining to the game space to be assigned to an in-game tag.
Execution of content submission engine 110 may generate a user-interface for allowing user interaction with the system 100. The interface allows a user to assign user generated information to a particular virtual space coordinate (VSC) and a corresponding tag within the game space. The interface specifically allows for allocation of user generated content as might contemporaneously or previously have been stored in content database 120.
During game play, a user may navigate a particular portion of a game environment such as a particular passageway as illustrated in
Through depressing a particular button on a control device (or combination of buttons) used in conjunction with game play, a tag is assigned to that particular locale in the game space. Other means of assigning a tag are envisioned including gesture based assignment in those games utilizing motion based or gesture recognition controls. Audio commands may likewise be used to assign a tag in those games utilizing voice commands or having voice recognition capabilities (e.g., ‘drop tag’ or ‘assign tag’).
The particular locale in the game space has a VSC, which is the in-game equivalent to a global positioning system location. Through the use of a VSC, and as further described with respect to VSC engine 130, the particular tag will consistently be correlated to that portion of the game space. Whenever another game player (or the same game player) passes by that VSC after the tag has been assigned, the tag and any corresponding information in the content database 120 will be made accessible for review and study.
Content submission engine 110 allows a user to assign user generated information to a tag that was ‘dropped’ in the game space. It is difficult, if not impossible, to provide detailed information, hints, or other data during the course of game play. The content submission engine 110 provides the interface environment that allows for casual entry of that information following the completion of game play. The content submission engine 110 provides a post-game play listing of all tags that were dropped or assigned during game play and allows the user the means to provide an associated set of information to be stored in or retrieved from content database 120.
Through an interface generated by the content submission engine 110, a user may provide a detailed text message concerning information about the game play environment. The content may further include links to web pages concerning game play, that provide further related information, or information concerning upcoming tournaments, clans, and discussion groups. A tag might also be associated with screen shots or other images related to game play and that might prove useful such as maps or of interest such as ‘kill shots.’ A tag can also be assigned to audio and video clips generated by a user and that might provide a ‘replay’ of a particular portion of the game or verbal coaching as to game play. Profile information of the user providing the tag and corresponding user information may also be associated with a tag.
Entry of the game play information may be textual where a user enters a written description of the game play advice (e.g., ‘watch out for this guy’ or ‘through this door’ as shown in
In some embodiments, the content submission engine 110 allows the user to re-trace game play and generate tags after the completion of game play. Some games might be so intense that even the act of generating a mere tag might interfere with optimal game play. In such a game, the user can execute the content submission engine 110 after game play is complete and ‘re-trace’ their steps, as the game will have tracked what portions of the environment were and were not accessed during play. The user may then assign tags to particular portions of the game space using a VSC system and the information associated therewith.
Submission of game play advice may also be contextually relevant. As many games are dynamic, especially first-person shooter type games, a particular scenario encountered in a particular environment during one round of game play (e.g., particular enemies) may differ significantly from a subsequent encounter albeit in the exact same game space depending on a particular scenario generated by the game play intelligence. In such an instance, providing a tag indicative of game play advice to a subsequent user when the event giving rise to the tag is not at hand may be distracting and actually detract from effective game play.
Game event and context engine 140 may track these particular nuanced events and, in conjunction with the matching and display engine 150, ensure that only contextually relevant tags are displayed. Information concerning context may be automatically be displayed by the content submission engine 110. Alternatively, a user might identify specific contextually specific limitations during the information provisioning process.
In order to avoid inconsistent naming protocols and that might otherwise complicate presentation of context sensitive game play advice, the content submission engine 110 may indicate that hints related to storming the beach at Omaha in a World War II combat simulation are all provided under the category of ‘Omaha Beach’ instead of a series of user generated titles such as ‘storming the beach,’ ‘Omaha,’ ‘chapter II,’ and others. The content submission engine 110 may work in conjunction with the game event and context engine 140 with respect to providing naming protocols.
The content submission engine 110 may also allow for user corrections or annotations of game play advice. For example, a previous user might provide information concerning accessing a particular weapon, but erroneously identifies the particular weapon or provides some other contextually inappropriate information. A subsequent user (or users) receiving that contextually inappropriate information may recognize the error or that the information might be better presented in a subsequent stage or area of game play (or simply correct an otherwise minor error). The subsequent user may lodge a complaint or suggest that an entity tasked with quality assurance of game play advice review the submission and/or context of the same.
Content database 120 may store all game play advice received through an interface generated by content submission engine 110. Alternatively, certain game play advice may expire over time or upon the occurrence of certain events. For example, the content database 120 may only retain the top-100 ranked game play advice submissions (as described in further detail herein). Once a particular instance of game play advice falls below a top-100 threshold, that particular instance may be deleted from the content database 120. Expiration may be temporal such that instances of game play advice that are not accessed for a particular period of time are removed from the content database 120. Instances of game play advice may also be removed from the game play advice content database 120 a predetermined number of days after having been submitted to the system 100.
Content database 120 may store all game play advice received through an interface generated by content submission engine 110. Alternatively, certain game play advice may expire over time or upon the occurrence of certain events. For example, the database 120 may only retain the top-100 ranked game play advice submissions (as described in further detail herein). Once a particular instance of game play advice falls below a top-100 threshold, that particular instance may be deleted from the database 120. Expiration may be temporal such that instances of game play advice that are not accessed for a particular period of time are removed from the database 120. Instances of game play advice may also be removed from the game play advice database 120 a predetermined number of days after having been submitted to the system 100.
System 100 may include a ranking engine (not shown) to manage the ranking of game play advice stored in content database 120. As described in co-pending patent publication numbers U.S. 2010-0041475 A1 for “Real-Time, Contextual Display of Ranked, User-Generated Game Play Advice” and U.S. 2009-0063463 A1 for “Ranking of User-Generated Game Play Advice,” the disclosures of each being incorporated herein by reference, when new game play advice is received, a ranking engine may assign a default ranking to a new instance of game play advice. This default ranking and any other ranking (including those generated as a result of user feedback) may be measured utilizing any rubric capable of distinguishing one instance of user-generated game play advice from another. In conjunction with a feedback engine and optional weighting engine, both of which are described in the aforementioned publications, the perceived quality of game play advice as adjudicated by a community of users may be more readily identified.
Virtual spatial coordinate engine 130, as noted above, operates as a global positioning system for a particular game space. Depending on the particular layout of the game environment, the VSC engine 130 may identify an X, Y, and (if appropriate) Z coordinate for the game space. This coordinate in the game space is then associated with individual instances of in-game tags such that the tags are consistently provided in the same game space as when they were originally assigned. The VSC engine 130 not only provides consistent presentation of information, but also accurate presentation as more general descriptions such as ‘hallway by the door,’ ‘on the beach,’ or ‘Level II’ as might otherwise be utilized may not provide the specificity required to render useful game play advice. The VSC engine 130 may operate in conjunction with information concerning the rendering and tracking of user information for a particular game title and may thus be agnostic as to any particular game title.
Information concerning VSC data may be provided to the content submission engine 110 to allow for generation of content and matching to in-game tags. VSC data from engine 130 may likewise be provided to content database 120 to allow for proper retrieval and display of user content and in-game tags by matching and display engine 150. VSC data may also be used by game event and context engine 140 to assign proper game context to tags and associated content vis-à-vis the submission engine and the matching/display engine 150.
Game event and context engine 140 is tasked with providing game play advice in an appropriate context of game play such that it may be appropriately displayed by the matching and display engine 150. Content submission engine 110 allows for annotation of appropriate contexts of game play advice by means of an in-game tag. The game event and context engine 140 may identify the context of game play that would be appropriate for game play advice. For example, walking down an alleyway without threats, obstacles, or other encounters that would require tactical game play are not likely to warrant the need for hints or advice. Advancing up the beaches of Normandy on D-Day with heavy gun fire from German forces, obstacles and landmines on the beach, and advancing troops and equipment from the English Channel would clearly require quick and strategic thinking. In this instance, the game event and context engine 140 would, in conjunction with the matching and display engine 150, identify that tags providing game play advice are appropriate and feed that tag information to the display engine 150 such that tags may be displayed and content eventually accessed in content database 120.
A game developer may make initial determinations as to whether a particular task or level will provide certain challenges thus making advice warranted. The game event and context engine 140 may be programmed to correspond to such determinations. Further, the game developer may allow for the introduction of user generated game play advice in those contexts where the game developer provides their own default game play advice; these points may likewise be introduced into the game event and context engine 140. Game developers, too, may study game play feedback in network games with respect to identifying choke points or other areas where particular obstacles might prove to be more challenging in actual game play implementation than those obstacles were during the course of pre-release testing. A game developer may release an update to the game event and context engine 140 over a network that allows for introduction of user advice post-release. The content submission engine 110 may then access the game event and context engine 140 to allow for users to provide this information. These points may be with respect to levels, obstacles, events, enemies, and so forth.
As noted with respect to the content submission engine 110, the game event and context engine 140 may identify certain points of game play related to objects, challenges, or enemies as well as levels or stages as a whole. Game code or other metadata may be flagged with respect to objects or enemies and these flags may be recognized by the game event and context engine 140 upon execution of the game code by a gaming system or processing device. These flags or metadata may be tied to allowing for entry of game play advice. For example, in a World War II simulation, a player might be crossing a field. The field, without any enemies present, may not warrant the need for game play advice—submissions or providing of the same. Later in that same game environment (the field) a tank may enter the scene and begin firing upon the game player. With the introduction of the tank, providing or receiving game play advice may now be warranted. For the tank to appear in the scene would require the execution of code related to the tank. The code for introducing and intelligently controlling the tank by the game platform may be flagged or identified by the aforementioned metadata. Once that flagged code or metadata is recognized by the game event and context engine 140, a user may provide advice or receive the same.
The game event and context engine 140, in this regard, is not only responsible for identifying those points or instances of game play where a user may provide advice, but also those instances where providing advice is appropriate. For example, in the previously mentioned alleyway example, no challenges are present thus making the introduction of advice by the system inappropriate or unnecessary. Should a sniper suddenly begin firing upon the game player, then advice on how to deal with the sniper may be appropriate for the user to consider. The game event and context engine 140 may recognize that providing information related to the sniper is appropriate based on the game platform loading flagged code related to the sniper. Similar provisioning of advice may occur with respect to encountering objects and the like. The game event and context engine 140 may be tied to the game play advice display engine 150 to allow for timely and contextually appropriate display of that advice.
Game play advice display engine 150 is configured to allow for the eventual display of user-generated game play advice via in-game tags and VSC data. Display of this advice may be in further accordance with a ranking result generated by a ranking engine and in further consideration of determinations made by the game event and context engine 140. Game play advice display engine 150 acquires information from the game play advice content database 120 (the advice) and a ranking database (if appropriate), which has ranked game play advice as determined by a ranking engine, and displays the game play advice (or makes available the game play advice) in accordance with the VSC data from engine 130 as well as the game event and context engine 140's determination that the display of advice related to a particular in-game tag and aspect of game play is appropriate.
By working in conjunction with the game event and context engine 140, the display engine 150 may display the highest ranked information but do so in the most appropriate context. For example, displaying information about a particular enemy may be inappropriate when the user has not encountered that enemy notwithstanding the fact that the user providing the information previously encountered that enemy at the same VSC coordinates.
The display engine 150 may utilize an asynchronous programming language to provide real-time (or substantially near real-time) updates to ranked game play advice for display to a community of users. The display engine 150 may, therefore, utilize a ladder ranking of game play advice with respect to determining which in-game tags to display. In such an embodiment, the highest quality advice is presented as that advice ranks at the top of a ladder. In some embodiments, the particular arrangement of the advice as it corresponds to a given tag may be subject to user or system preferences such as particular tags searched by a user or identified as being desirable by a user.
For example, a user may consistently experience difficulty using a particular weapon during game play (e.g., a sniper rifle). Prior to game play, a user seeking advice may, through a corresponding search engine or other interface, inform system 100 that only those in-game tags and corresponding advice with respect to user of the sniper-rifle is wanted. In this manner, the user is not inundated with data concerning the use of grenades, hand guns, and rocket launchers—all weapons with which the user might be quite prolific and for which advice is not needed.
Similar searching and screening of tags may be used with respect to advice from particular users or particular clans. This information may be derived from profile information provided during tag and advice generation. In some instances, a user providing game play advice may limit the accessibility of that advice to a limited number of users. A user wishing to access device from a particular providing user may need to have been identified in advance of in-game tag access or otherwise provide a password or some indicia indicating that they are authorized to access in-game tags and corresponding advice generated by a particular user.
Display engine 150 may display advice in the context of a real-world virtual environment and/or a first- or third-person avatar. Game play advice may be expressly provided via an in-game tag as shown in
In step 210, user-generated game play advice is received from a user in the community via an interface generated by the content submission engine 110. Upon receipt of the user-generated advice in step 210, the advice is processed by the system 100 as described in the context of
In step 220, the user-generated game play advice, which is associated with a tag, is assigned a particular context either by the user submitting the advice or by the game event and context engine 140 as well as being matched with a given tag using VSC coordinates. In some instances, the game event and context engine 140 may control the available contexts that a user assigns to the advice. In other instances, the game event and context engine 140 may make a determination as to the specific context of advice.
Following subsequent game play (230), the same or a different game player may be navigating a particular game space. A previously generated tag may be identified by means of VSC coordinates at step 240 (i.e., a tag exists as to some particular game play advice at this particular locale in the game space). The context of a game event is then identified in step 250. Identification step 250 occurs as a result of the joint operation of the game event and context engine 140 and display engine 150 and may be similar to identification of an initial context of game play advice as occurs in the context of step 230 (but not otherwise displayed in
The method 200 of
Updating of information displayed in
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Various alternative systems may be utilized to implement the various methodologies described herein and various methods may be used to achieve certain results from the aforementioned systems.
The present continuation application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 12/777,268 filed on May 11, 2010 and titled, “Placement of User Information in a Game Space,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3147341 | Gibson, Jr. | Sep 1964 | A |
3200193 | Biggs et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3717345 | Banville | Feb 1973 | A |
3943277 | Everly et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4051491 | Toyoda | Sep 1977 | A |
4051520 | Davidse et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4068847 | Lukkarila et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4090216 | Constable | May 1978 | A |
4116444 | Mayer et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4133004 | Fitts | Jan 1979 | A |
4166429 | Smorzaniuk | Sep 1979 | A |
4166430 | Johnson, Jr. | Sep 1979 | A |
4203385 | Mayer et al. | May 1980 | A |
4241341 | Thorson | Dec 1980 | A |
4321635 | Tsuyuguchi | Mar 1982 | A |
4355334 | Fitzgibbon et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4361850 | Nishimura | Nov 1982 | A |
4448200 | Brooks et al. | May 1984 | A |
4514727 | Van Antwerp | Apr 1985 | A |
4533937 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4646075 | Andrews et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4649504 | Krouglicof et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4658247 | Gharachorloo | Apr 1987 | A |
4672564 | Egli et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675562 | Herlein et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677569 | Nakano et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4683466 | Holtey et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4685054 | Manninen et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4685146 | Fenster et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4709231 | Sakaibara et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4727365 | Bunker et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4737921 | Goldwasser et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4757525 | Matthews et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4764727 | McConchie, Sr. | Aug 1988 | A |
4807158 | Blanton et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817005 | Kubota et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4843568 | Krueger et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4860197 | Langendorf et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864515 | Deck | Sep 1989 | A |
4866637 | Gonzalez-Lopez et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4901064 | Deering | Feb 1990 | A |
4905147 | Logg | Feb 1990 | A |
4905168 | McCarthy et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4933864 | Evans, Jr. et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934908 | Turrell et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4942538 | Yuan et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943938 | Aoshima et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4952917 | Yabuuchi | Aug 1990 | A |
4956794 | Zeevi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4962540 | Tsujiuchi et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969036 | Bhanu et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4980823 | Liu | Dec 1990 | A |
4991223 | Bradley | Feb 1991 | A |
4992972 | Brooks et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5014327 | Potter et al. | May 1991 | A |
5034986 | Karmann et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5045843 | Hansen | Sep 1991 | A |
5057744 | Barbier et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064291 | Reiser | Nov 1991 | A |
5067014 | Bergen et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5128671 | Thomas, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
5128794 | Mocker et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5162781 | Cambridge | Nov 1992 | A |
5194941 | Grimaldi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208763 | Hong et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212888 | Cary et al. | May 1993 | A |
5222203 | Obata | Jun 1993 | A |
5227985 | DeMenthon | Jul 1993 | A |
5230623 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5253339 | Wells et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261820 | Slye et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265888 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268996 | Steiner et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5269687 | Mott et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274560 | LaRue | Dec 1993 | A |
5297061 | Dementhon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305389 | Palmer | Apr 1994 | A |
5307137 | Jones et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5335557 | Yasutake | Aug 1994 | A |
5351090 | Nakamura | Sep 1994 | A |
5354202 | Moncrief et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361147 | Katayama et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363120 | Drumm | Nov 1994 | A |
5366376 | Copperman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367615 | Economy et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5369737 | Gholizadeh et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5377997 | Wilden et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5387943 | Silver | Feb 1995 | A |
5405151 | Naka et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5446714 | Yoshio et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446798 | Morita et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448687 | Hoogerhyde et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450504 | Calia | Sep 1995 | A |
5469193 | Giobbi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473736 | Young | Dec 1995 | A |
5526041 | Glatt | Jun 1996 | A |
5534917 | MacDougall | Jul 1996 | A |
5537638 | Morita et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548667 | Tu | Aug 1996 | A |
5550960 | Shirman | Aug 1996 | A |
5555532 | Sacha | Sep 1996 | A |
5557684 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559950 | Cannon | Sep 1996 | A |
5563989 | Billyard | Oct 1996 | A |
5572261 | Cooper | Nov 1996 | A |
5574836 | Broemmelsiek | Nov 1996 | A |
5577179 | Blank | Nov 1996 | A |
5577913 | Moncrief et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586231 | Florent et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590248 | Zarge et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598297 | Yamanaka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611000 | Szeliski et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616078 | Oh | Apr 1997 | A |
5617407 | Bareis | Apr 1997 | A |
5630033 | Purcell et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631697 | Nishimura et al. | May 1997 | A |
5647019 | Iino et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649032 | Burt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659671 | Tannenbaum et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660547 | Copperman | Aug 1997 | A |
5668646 | Katayama et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672820 | Rossi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673374 | Sakaibara et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5680487 | Markandey | Oct 1997 | A |
5684887 | Lee et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699497 | Erdahl et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704024 | Voorhies et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717848 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734384 | Yanof et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748865 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748867 | Cosman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751928 | Bakalash | May 1998 | A |
5756354 | Tzidon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757360 | Nitta et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760781 | Kaufman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761401 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764803 | Jacquin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769718 | Rieder | Jun 1998 | A |
5774124 | Itoh et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781194 | Ponomarev et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786801 | Ichise | Jul 1998 | A |
5793376 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796952 | Davis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798519 | Vock et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805170 | Burch | Sep 1998 | A |
5805745 | Graf | Sep 1998 | A |
5805782 | Foran | Sep 1998 | A |
5808617 | Kenworthy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808619 | Choi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812136 | Keondjian | Sep 1998 | A |
5812141 | Kamen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818424 | Korth | Oct 1998 | A |
5818553 | Koenck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825308 | Rosenberg | Oct 1998 | A |
5831623 | Negishi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838366 | Snape et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852443 | Kenworthy | Dec 1998 | A |
5854632 | Steiner | Dec 1998 | A |
5856844 | Batterman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864342 | Kajiya et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864742 | Gasper et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870097 | Snyder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870098 | Gardiner | Feb 1999 | A |
5880736 | Peercy et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880856 | Ferriere | Mar 1999 | A |
5889505 | Toyama et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890122 | Van Kleeck et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894308 | Isaacs | Apr 1999 | A |
5899810 | Smith | May 1999 | A |
5903318 | Demay et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905894 | De Bonet | May 1999 | A |
5912830 | Krech, Jr. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913727 | Ahdoot | Jun 1999 | A |
5914724 | Deering et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915972 | Tada | Jun 1999 | A |
5917937 | Szeliski et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923318 | Zhai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923381 | Demay et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929860 | Hoppe | Jul 1999 | A |
5933150 | Ngo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933535 | Lee et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935198 | Blomgren | Aug 1999 | A |
5949424 | Cabral et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953485 | Abecassis | Sep 1999 | A |
5959673 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963209 | Hoppe | Oct 1999 | A |
5964660 | James et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966133 | Hoppe | Oct 1999 | A |
5977977 | Kajiya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982352 | Pryor | Nov 1999 | A |
5982390 | Stoneking et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986668 | Szeliski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987164 | Szeliski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990901 | Lawton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002738 | Cabral et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009188 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009190 | Szeliski et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010403 | Adam et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016150 | Lengyel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018347 | Willis | Jan 2000 | A |
6018349 | Szeliski et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023523 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026182 | Lee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031934 | Ahmad et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034691 | Aono et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6034692 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6034693 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035067 | Ponticos | Mar 2000 | A |
6037947 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040842 | Wavish et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044181 | Szeliski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046744 | Hoppe | Apr 2000 | A |
6049619 | Anandan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049636 | Yang | Apr 2000 | A |
6058397 | Barrus et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072494 | Nguyen | Jun 2000 | A |
6072504 | Segen | Jun 2000 | A |
6081274 | Shiraishi | Jun 2000 | A |
6100898 | Malamy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101289 | Kellner | Aug 2000 | A |
6112240 | Pogue et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6121953 | Walker | Sep 2000 | A |
6127936 | Gendel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130673 | Pulli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137492 | Hoppe | Oct 2000 | A |
6141013 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141041 | Carlborn et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155924 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6157386 | Wilde | Dec 2000 | A |
6162123 | Woolston | Dec 2000 | A |
6172354 | Adan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175367 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181384 | Kurashige et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181988 | Schneider et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199093 | Yokoya | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200138 | Ando et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201581 | Moriwake et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203426 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208347 | Migdal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220962 | Miyamoto et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222555 | Christofferson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229553 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233291 | Shukhman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252608 | Snyder et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6268875 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273814 | Komoto | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288730 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313841 | Ogata et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313842 | Tampieri | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319129 | Igarashi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320580 | Yasui et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323838 | Thanasack | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330000 | Fenney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331851 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342885 | Knittel et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348921 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353272 | van der Hoeven | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356263 | Migdal et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6356272 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356288 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361438 | Morihira | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366272 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392647 | Migdal et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396490 | Gorman | May 2002 | B1 |
6400842 | Fukuda | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6411298 | Goto et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414960 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417836 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421057 | Lauer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426720 | Ross et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426755 | Deering | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456977 | Wang | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476807 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488505 | Hightower | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6489955 | Newhall, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496189 | Yaron et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496598 | Harmon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504538 | Freund et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529206 | Ohki et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529875 | Nakajima et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538666 | Ozawa et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545663 | Arbter et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554707 | Sinclair et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563499 | Waupotitsch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571208 | Kuhn et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572475 | Okabe et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6573890 | Lengyel | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577312 | Deering et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578197 | Peercy et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585599 | Horigami et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594388 | Gindele et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597363 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609976 | Yamagishi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611265 | Hong et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6639594 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639609 | Hayashi | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6646639 | Greene et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646640 | Nagy | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650329 | Koike | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652376 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664955 | Deering | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664959 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680746 | Kawai et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686924 | Mang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6714236 | Wada et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717576 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6717579 | Deslandes et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6717599 | Olano | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720949 | Pryor et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738059 | Yoshinaga et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744442 | Chan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6750867 | Gibson | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753870 | Deering et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755654 | Hightower | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764403 | Gavin | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771264 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6771813 | Katsuyama | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778181 | Kilgariff et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781594 | Day | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795068 | Marks | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798411 | Gorman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6803910 | Pfister et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803964 | Post et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807296 | Mishima | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6825851 | Leather | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6850236 | Deering | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850243 | Kilgariff et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6853382 | Van Dyke et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6854632 | Larsson | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6864895 | Tidwell et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6903738 | Pfister et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912010 | Baker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917692 | Murching et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928433 | Goodman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956871 | Wang et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962527 | Baba | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6995788 | James | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006101 | Brown et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7072792 | Freifeld | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079138 | Day | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081893 | Cerny | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085722 | Luisi | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101284 | Kake et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113193 | Marks | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7162314 | Fay et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7180529 | Covannon et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194539 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7214133 | Jen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233904 | Luisi | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7251315 | Quinton | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7293235 | Powers et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304667 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7333150 | Cooper | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339589 | Annunziata | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7589723 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7636126 | Mallinson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7777746 | Annunziata | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7877262 | Luisi | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880746 | Marks et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7916215 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920209 | Mallinson | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7965338 | Chen | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8133115 | Campbell | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8204272 | Marks | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8243089 | Marks et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284310 | Mallinson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289325 | Green et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8798401 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
10786736 | Weising | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20010048434 | Brown | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020018063 | Donovan et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020041335 | Taraci et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047937 | Wells | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020068626 | Takeda et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080136 | Kouadio | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107070 | Nagy | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130866 | Stuttard | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140703 | Baker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162081 | Solomon | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167518 | Migdal et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030009748 | Glanville et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043163 | Day | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030045359 | Leen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050112 | Leen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058238 | Doak et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030104868 | Okita et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112238 | Cerny et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117391 | Olano | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142232 | Albean | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030179220 | Dietrich et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216177 | Aonuma et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003370 | Schenk et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040051716 | Sevigny | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056860 | Collodi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040100582 | Stanger | May 2004 | A1 |
20040130550 | Blanco | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040130552 | Duluk, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040166935 | Gavin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040219976 | Campbell | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040263636 | Cutler et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268413 | Reid et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001836 | Day | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019020 | Sato et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024379 | Marks | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050026689 | Marks | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050078116 | Sloan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090302 | Campbell | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090312 | Campbell | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050243094 | Patel et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246638 | Whitten | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253965 | Cooper | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060015348 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060039017 | Park | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047704 | Gopalakrishnan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071933 | Green et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060209210 | Swan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214943 | Day | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238549 | Marks | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060290810 | Mallinson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070035831 | Gutierrez Novelo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070094335 | Tu | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106760 | Houh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070168309 | Tzruya et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191097 | Johnson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070257928 | Marks et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279427 | Marks | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080070655 | Tanabe | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080215994 | Harrison | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080268956 | Suzuki | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268961 | Brook et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274798 | Walker et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090007186 | Hartwell | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090017908 | Miyamoto | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040222 | Green et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063463 | Turner et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088233 | O'Rourke | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118015 | Chang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131177 | Pearce | May 2009 | A1 |
20090193453 | Cansler et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209337 | Vrignaud et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227368 | Wyatt | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100029387 | Luisi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041475 | Zalewski | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053430 | Mallinson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100179857 | Kalaboukis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110181776 | Mallinson | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205240 | Marks et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110249072 | Marks | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281648 | Weising | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130129142 | Miranda-Steiner | May 2013 | A1 |
20140087877 | Krishnan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
112012028924 | Feb 2021 | BR |
1201180 | Dec 1998 | CN |
1369849 | Sep 2002 | CN |
1652063 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1806236 | Jul 2006 | CN |
1910619 | Feb 2007 | CN |
1317666 | May 2007 | CN |
101198277 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101375596 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101401081 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101553862 | Oct 2009 | CN |
103002960 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103706117 | Apr 2014 | CN |
103002960 | Nov 2016 | CN |
103706117 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106964155 | Jul 2017 | CN |
107491701 | Dec 2017 | CN |
106964155 | Oct 2020 | CN |
107491701 | Oct 2020 | CN |
19905076 | May 2000 | DE |
60235994.508 | Apr 2010 | DE |
0448411 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0553973 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0615386 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0789296 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0850673 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0947948 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1029569 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1176559 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1229499 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1419481 | May 2004 | EP |
1479421 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1541207 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1541208 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1630754 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1650706 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1419481 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2569063 | Mar 2013 | EP |
3608003 | Feb 2020 | EP |
1419481 | Apr 2010 | FR |
2351637 | Jan 2001 | GB |
2411065 | Aug 2005 | GB |
1419481 | Apr 2010 | GB |
9902CHENP2012 | Apr 2014 | IN |
S59002040 | Jan 1984 | JP |
S59202779 | Nov 1984 | JP |
S61131110 | Jun 1986 | JP |
H01229393 | Sep 1989 | JP |
H01308908 | Dec 1989 | JP |
H04151780 | May 1992 | JP |
H0527779 | Apr 1993 | JP |
H05336540 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H06089342 | Mar 1994 | JP |
H06266854 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2006301474 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H06301474 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H07160412 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H07253774 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H07271999 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H07334664 | Dec 1995 | JP |
H08112449 | May 1996 | JP |
H08155140 | Jun 1996 | JP |
H09047576 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H09178426 | Jul 1997 | JP |
H09265379 | Oct 1997 | JP |
H10055454 | Feb 1998 | JP |
H10165649 | Jun 1998 | JP |
H11070273 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11179050 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000020193 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000070546 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000137828 | May 2000 | JP |
2000157724 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000311251 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000218036 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000233072 | Aug 2000 | JP |
3384978 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000237453 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000338993 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000339491 | Dec 2000 | JP |
3244798 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001029649 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001198350 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002052256 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002140705 | May 2002 | JP |
2002153676 | May 2002 | JP |
2002159749 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002177547 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002304637 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2001079263 | Mar 2003 | JP |
3588351 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004321797 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005500629 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005125095 | May 2005 | JP |
2005125098 | May 2005 | JP |
2006178948 | Jul 2006 | JP |
3821822 | Sep 2006 | JP |
3901960 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007136215 | Jun 2007 | JP |
3971380 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2008165784 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008278937 | Nov 2008 | JP |
4381371 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010088694 | Apr 2010 | JP |
4616330 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2013528432 | Jul 2013 | JP |
5889876 | Mar 2016 | JP |
20000072753 | Dec 2000 | KR |
20020065397 | Aug 2002 | KR |
100606653 | Jul 2006 | KR |
1020130118209 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020170091779 | Aug 2017 | KR |
101881787 | Jul 2018 | KR |
561448 | Nov 2003 | TW |
191667 | Mar 2004 | TW |
WO1994018790 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO1998002223 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO1998053443 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO2000010130 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO2001029768 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2001082626 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO2003017200 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO2005040900 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2006033360 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006041993 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2007001633 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2008018943 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2008058271 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008058271 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2011142857 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Dec. 15, 2003 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2002/026360. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 2, 2004 in EP Application No. EP02001875.0. |
Communication from Examining Division dated May 24, 2007 in EP Application No. 02001875.0. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Jun. 17, 2009 in EP Application No. 02001875.0. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2006 in EP Application No. 02768608.8. |
Mark et al. “Compiling to a VLIW Fragment Pipeline.” In Proceedings of 2001 SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Workshop on Graphics Hardware, pp. 47-55. 9 pages. |
Arvo, J. “Backward Ray Tracing.” In Developments in Ray Tracing, Computer Graphics, Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 86 Course Notes, vol. 12, Aug. 1986. pp. 259-263. Retyped from original. 2 pages. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 6, 2006 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/035947. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Jan. 12, 2007 in EP Application No. 02768608.8. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Nov. 12, 2009 regarding Intention to Grant a European Patent in EP Application No. 02768608.8. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Mar. 18, 2010 regarding Decision to Grant a European Patent in EP Application No. 02768608.8. |
Partial European Search Report dated Jul. 19, 2007 in EP Application No. EP01306264.1. |
European Search Report dated Oct. 12, 2007 in EP Application No. EP01306264.1. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Jul. 8, 2008 in EP Application No. 01306264.1. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Oct. 16, 2009 in EP Application No. 01306264.1. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Jan. 2, 2014 in EP Application No. 11780949.1. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Dec. 22, 2004 regarding European Search Report—Search Not Possible in EP Application No. 04256331.2. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Nov. 7, 2008 in EP Application No. 04256331.2. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Jul. 27, 2010 in EP Application No. 04256331.2. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 7, 2007 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/017574. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Dec. 22, 2004 regarding European Search Report—Search Not Possible 4 in EP Application No. 04256342.9. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Apr. 28, 2006 in EP Application No. 04256342.9. |
International Search Report dated Mar. 31, 2011 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/023780. |
European Search Report dated Aug. 20, 2004 for EP Application No. EP04251842.3. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Apr. 28, 2005 in EP Application No. 04251842.3. |
Communication from the Examining Division dated Jun. 14, 2006 regarding Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings for EP Application No. 04251842.3. |
Communication from Examining Division dated Feb. 1, 2007 regarding Decision to Refuse the Application in EP Application No. 04251842.3. |
Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2014 in Chinese Application No. 201180034304.4 filed Jan. 11, 2013. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2015 in Japanese Application No. 2013-510086 filed Feb. 4, 2011. |
Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2015 in Chinese Application 201180034304.4 filed Feb. 4, 2011. |
Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2016 in Chinese Application 201310484667.9 filed Oct. 17, 2013, 11 pages. |
Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2016 in Chinese Application 201180034304.4 filed Feb. 4, 2011, 4 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2016 in Korean Application 10-2012-7032205 filed Feb. 4, 2011, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 4, 2016 in Chinese Application 201180034304.4 filed Feb. 4, 2011, 5 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, Chinese Patent Application No. 201310484667.9, dated Sep. 5, 2016, 5 pages. |
“Office Action,” European Patent Application No. 11780949.1, dated Feb. 13, 2017, 7 pages. |
Korean Application No. 10-2012-7032205, “Office Action,” dated Dec. 26, 2016, 3 pages [6 pages including translation]. |
Chinese Application No. 201280033005.3, “Office Action,” dated Feb. 28, 2017, 3 pages [5 pages including translation]. |
“Office Action,” South Korea Patent Application No. 1020127032205, dated Apr. 28, 2017, 4 pages [8 pages including translation]. |
“Office Action,” South Korea Patent Application No. 1020177021490, dated Sep. 20, 2017, 5 pages [10 pages including translation]. |
“Office Action,” South Korea Patent Application No. 1020177021490, dated Mar. 30, 2018, 4 pages [8 pages including translation]. |
“Notice of Allowance,” South Korea Patent Application No. 1020177021490, dated May 8, 2018, 2 pages [3 pages including translation]. |
“Summons,” European Patent Application No. 11780949.1, Feb. 14, 2019, 9 pages. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2015 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/050908, 11 pages. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 11, 2015 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/050870, 13 pages. |
“Office Action,” Brazil Patent Application No. BR1120120289241, dated Aug. 2, 2019, 4 pages. |
“Office Action,” India Patent Application No. 9585/CHENP/2012, dated Oct. 22, 2019, 6 pages. |
“Minutes of Oral Proceeding”, European Patent Convention Application No. 11780949.1, Oct. 25, 2019, 4 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report,” European Application No. 19197482.3, dated Nov. 6, 2019, 10 pages. |
“Decision to Refuse,” European Patent Convention Application No. 11780949.1, dated Nov. 4, 2019, 16 pages. |
“Office Action,” China Patent Application No. 201610912795.2, dated Oct. 21, 2019, 5 pages (11 pages including translation). |
Aguilera et al. “Impaired Persons Facilities Based on a Multi-Modality Speech Processing System.” In Proceedings on Speech & Language Technology, 1993. 4 pages. |
Arons, B. “Authoring and Transcription Tools for Speech-Based Hypermedia.” In Proceedings of American Voice I/O Society, 1991. 5 pages. |
Arons, B. “Hyperspeech: Navigating in Speech-Only Hypermedia.” In Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Conference on Hypertext, ACM, 1991. pp. 133-146. |
Bennacef, S.K. “A Spoken Language System for Information Retrieval.” In ICSLP, vol. 94, pp. 1271-1274. 1994. 4 pages. |
Gauvain et al. “Speech recognition for an Information Kiosk.” In Spoken Language, 1996. ICSLP 96. Proceedings. Fourth International Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 849-852. IEEE, 1996. |
Gauvain et al. “Spoken Language Component of the MASK Kiosk.” In Human Comfort and Security of Information Systems, pp. 93-103. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997. 11 pages. |
Gauvain et al. “The LIMSI Continuous Speech Dictation System.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology, pp. 319-324. Association for Computational Linguistics, Apr. 1994. 6 pages. |
Gauvain et al. “The LIMSI Continuous Speech Dictation System: Evaluation on the ARPA Wall Street Journal Task.” In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1994. ICASSP-94., 1994 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 1, IEEE, 1994, 4 pp. |
Goddeau et al. “Galaxy: A Human-Language Interface to On-Line Travel Information.”In Third International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 1994, pp. 707-710. |
House, D. “Spoken-Language Access to Multimedia (SLAM): Masters Thesis.” Oregon Graduate Inst., Dept. of CS and Eng., 1995. 59 pages. |
Lamel et al. “Recent Developments in Spoken Language Systems for Information Retrieval.” In Spoken Dialogue Systems—Theories and Applications. 1995, 4 pages. |
Language Industry Monitor, “Janet Baker's Optimism.” 1992. [retrieved on Oct. 25, 2011]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.lim.nl/monitor/dragon.html>, 2 pages. |
Mostow et al. “Towards a Reading Coach That Listens: Automated Detection of Oral Reading Errors.” Proc. of the 11th Ntl. Conf. on A.I., 1993, pp. 392-397. |
Russell et al. “Applications of Automatic Speech Recognition to Speech and Language Development in Young Children.” In Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language, 1996. ICSLP 96. Vol. 1, pp. 176-179. IEEE, 1996. 4 pages. |
“Office Action,” Brazil Patent Application No. BR1120120289241, dated Mar. 11, 2020, 4 pages [8 pages including translation]. |
“Notice of Allowance,” China Patent Application No. 201610912795.2, dated Jul. 6, 2020, 2 pages (5 pages including translation). |
Agui et al. “Computer Graphics.” Shokodo Co., Ltd., Jul. 1992, 1st ed., pp. 80-101 (Environment Mapping). |
Auslander et al. “Fast, Effective Dynamic Compilation.” In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 149-159. ACM, 1996. 11 pages. |
Balakrishnan et al. “Exploring Interactive Curve and Surface Manipulation Using a Bend and Twist Sensitive Input Strip.” In Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp. 111-118. ACM, 1999. 9 pages. |
Balakrishnan et al. “Performance Differences in the Fingers, Wrist, and Forearm in Computer Input Control.” In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 303-310. ACM, 1997. 10 pages. |
Balakrishnan et al. “The PadMouse: Facilitating Selection and Spatial Postioning for the Non-Dominant Hand.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 9-16. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1998. 9 pages. |
Balakrishnan et al. “Exploring Bimanual Camera Control and Object Manipulation in 3D Graphics Interfaces.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 56-62. ACM, 1999. 8 pages. |
Beshers et al. “Generating Efficient Virtual Worlds for Visualization Using Partial Evaluation and Dynamic Compilation.” In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 107-115. ACM, 1997. 9 pages. |
Blinn et al. “Texture and Reflection in Computer Generated Images.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, ACM, Oct. 1, 1976, pp. 542-547, vol. 19, No. 10, New York, NY USA. |
Blinn, J.F. “Light Reflection Functions for Simulation of Clouds and Dusty Surfaces.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, pp. 21-29, vol. 16, Issue 3, Jul. 1982. |
Blinn, J.F. “Models of Light Reflection for Computer Synthesized Pictures.” In ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 192-198. ACM, 1977. |
Calvert, J. “SCEE announces EyeToy:Chat.” Game Spot, May 5, 2004. [retrieved Jun. 5, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6095429.html.>. |
Chan et al. “Efficient Partitioning of Fragment Shaders for Multipass Rendering on Programmable Graphics Hardware.” In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Conference on Graphics Hardware. pp. 69-78, 156. Eurographics Association, 2002 (Sarrbrucken, Germany, Sep. 1-2, 2002). |
Davenport et al. “Cinematic Primitives for Multimedia.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (Aug. 1991), vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 67-74. |
Dorsey et al. “Design and Simultaion of Opera Lighting and Projection Effects.” In ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 41-50. ACM, 1991. |
European Search Report dated Jul. 27, 2010 in EP Application No. 04256331.2, filed Oct. 14, 2004. 4 pages. |
Fernando et al. “The Cg Tutorial: The Definitve Guide to Programmable Real-Time Graphics.” Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. CH. 1 sections 1.2 and 1.4; Appendix C section C.2. 40 pages. |
Fitzmaurice et al. “Sampling, Synthesis, and Input Devices.” Communications of the ACM, pp. 55-63. Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 55-63. Aug. 1999. |
Foley et al. “Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice.” Second Edition in C, Oct. 1996, pp. 721-745. |
Shiu et al. “Pose Determination of Circular Cylinders Using Elliptical and Side Projections.” In Systems Engineering, 1991. IEEE International Conference on. New York, IEEE, USA. p. 265-268. |
Nicewarner et al. Vision-Guided Grasping of a Strut for Truss Structure Assembly. In Intelligent Robotic Systems for Space Exploration, 1992. Proceedings. Fourth Annual Conference on, pp. 86-93. IEEE, 1992. |
Gueziec et al. “Simplicial Maps for Progressive Transmission of Polygonal Surfaces.” In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on the Virtual Reality Modeling Language ACM, 1998, pp. 25-31, 131, New York, NY, USA. |
Hayano et al. “Mesh Simplification Using Edge Operation with Feature Detection.” Inf. Proc. Soc. of Japan SIG Technical Report, Feb. 27, 1998, vol. 98, No. 16, pp. 72-76. |
Konma, T. “Rendering and Texture: Introduction to CG Creation in the Multimedia Age.” Nikkei Bus. Pub., Inc. Nov. 1996, No. 122, pp. 237 (Bump Mapping). |
Nilsson, “ID3 Tag Version 2.3.0.” ID3v2: The Audience is Informed, Feb. 3, 1999; [retrieved on Oct. 26, 2011]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.id3.org/id3v2.3.0>. |
Matsushita, Yasuyuki, “Special Effects: Interobject Reflection Effect: Starting OpenGL Programming with Mesa 3D.” Itsutsubachi Res. Co., Ltd., Jan. 2000, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 148-153. 6 pages. |
McCool et al. “Texture Shaders.” In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Workshop on Graphics Hardware, pp. 117-126. ACM, 1999. 11 pages. |
Akenine-Möller et al. “Real-time rendering.” 1999, pp. 68-81, A.K. Peters Ltd. 2008. |
Nakamura et al. “Adaptive Transmission of Polygonal Patch Datasets Taking into Account Shape and Color Distribution Features.” Inf. Proc. Soc. of Japan SIG Technical Report, Sep. 8, 2000, vol. 2000, No. 8, pp. 25-30. |
Nayar et al. “Lighting Sensitive Display.” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Oct. 2004, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 963-979, New York. |
NVIDIA Corporation, “User Guide CgFX Plug-In for 3ds Max.” Nov. 13, 2002, 26 pp. |
Palmer et al. “Tile Based Games FAQ.” GAMEDEV, Aug. 31, 2000. [retrieved on Oct. 25, 2011]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.ggdn.net/GameDev/3d/BlockGames/article728.asp.htm>. |
Peercy et al. “Interactive Multi-Pass Programmable Shading.” In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 425-432. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 2000. 8 pages. |
Phong, Bui Tuong, “Illumination for Computer Generated Pictures.” Communications of the ACM, 18(6), pp. 311-317, Jun. 1975. |
Pratt, David R., “A Software Architecture for the Construction and Management of Real-Time Virtual Worlds”, Disertation, Naval Post Graduate School, Monterey, California, Jun. 1993, pp. 62-67. |
Proudfoot et al. “A Real-Time Procedural Shading System for Programmable Graphics Hardware.” In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 159-170. ACM, Aug. 2001. 12 pages. |
Rushmeier et al. “Extending the Radiosity Method to Include Specularly Reflecting and Translucent Materials.” ACM Transaction on Graphics, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-27, Jan. 1990. |
Schlick, C. “A Survey of Shading and Reflectance Models.” In Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 121-131. Blackwell Science Ltd., 1994. 10 pages. |
Schlick, C. “A Fast Alternative to Phong's Specular Model.” In Graphics Gems IV, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 385-386, Academic Press Professional, Inc., 1994. |
Segen et al. “Gesture VR: Vision-Based 3D Hand Interface for Spatial Interaction.” In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 455-464. ACM, 1998. |
Pearce, A. “Shadow Attenuation for Ray Tracing Transparent Objects.” In Graphics Gems, pp. 397-399. Academic Press Professional, Inc., 1990. |
Tang et al. “Blending Structured Graphics and Layout.” In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 167-173. ACM, 1994. 8 pages. |
Taylor, Philip, “The MSDN Shader Workshop Application, Part 1.” Microsoft Corporation, Mar. 25, 2002. [retrieved on Oct. 26, 2011]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms810474(d=printer)>. |
Magnenat-Thalmann et al. “Interactive Computer Animation.” No. VRLAB-BOOK-2007-003. pp. 182-186. Prentice Hall, 1996. |
The PlayStation 2 Books Riding Spirits Official Complete Guide (graphics), Japan, SoftBank Publishing, Sep. 6, 2003, First Edition, 5 pages. |
Voorhoies et al. “Reflection Vector Shading Hardware.” In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 163-166. ACM, 1994. 4 pages. |
Ware et al. “Reaching for Objects in VR: Displays: Lag and Frame Rate.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 1, No. 4, Dec. 1994: 331-356. |
White, S. “The Technology of Jak & Daxter.” Game Developer's Conference, Mar. 6, 2003, [retrieved on Mar. 29, 2007]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.gamasutra.com/gdcarchive/2003/White_Stephen.ppt>. |
Woo et al. “A Survey of Shadow Algorithms.” Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 10, No. 6 (1990): 13-32. |
Ohashi et al. “A Gesture Recognition Method for a Stick Input System .” Transactions of the Information Processing Society of Japan 40, No. 2 (1999) [retrieved on Mar. 19, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110002764810>. 12 pages. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 4, 2003 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2002/026360. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210001224 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12777268 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 17029990 | US |