The present invention relates generally to an acoustic transducer or loudspeaker and, more particularly, to planar loudspeakers for use in suspended ceilings.
Advances in dynamic loudspeakers have been provided by the advent of planar diaphragm loudspeakers. Examples of such planar loudspeakers are shown and described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,003,449 and 4,997,058, both issued in the name of Jose J. Bertagni. Further examples are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,425,107, 5,539,835 and 5,693,917 issued to Alejandro Bertagni et al.
Planar loudspeakers can be manufactured in various shapes and sizes, and used in a multitude of applications. For example, planar loudspeakers have been used in suspended ceiling structures of the type found in commercial buildings. Such suspended ceilings typically comprise a series of metallic runners and tees forming a 2′×2′ or 2′×4′ grid onto which multiple acoustic ceiling tiles are placed, allowing for a uniform, uninterrupted surface appearance. When used in commercial ceiling structures, advantages by planar diaphragm loudspeakers over loudspeakers utilizing conventional cone-type diaphragms include greater dispersion of sound, economy of manufacture, ease of installation and improved aesthetic appearance. Conventional, cone-type loudspeakers have been used in commercial ceiling structures for decades. Their intended applications encompass paging, background or foreground music. Such cone-type devices require a metallic or plastic grille in the front side in order to conceal the cone—and in certain cases its hardware or a ported hole—from plain sight. Such grille is often perceived as visually unpleasant and also disrupts the continuity of the ceiling surface.
In prior planar loudspeaker approaches, two-dimensional representations have been used to mimic three-dimensional surface textures. For example, it has been previously known to have planar loudspeakers in the apparent shape of a ceiling tile which have a painted or screen-printed front surface in order to match the color and/or pattern design of the surrounding ceiling tiles, giving the installation an unobtrusive look. It is also known that a pre-printed sheet of paper can be applied over the front surface of the loudspeaker to obtain similar aesthetic results. Such example has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,596,733 and 3,779,336, both issued to Jose J. Bertagni. It has also been known to have planar loudspeakers with a stretched, pre-printed fabric over the exposed front surface of the diaphragm. Such fabric is to be used for decorative purposes, and could also be screen-printed to match certain ceiling tile patterns. Such example is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,596,733 and 3,779,336, both issued in the name of Jose J. Bertagni.
A recent interpretation of the latter is found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,386,315 issued to Kenneth P. Roy et al., though the fabric is stretched in front of the diaphragm but not in contact with its surface, therefore narrowing the application to acoustically transparent fabrics and therefore limiting its advantage. Although the surface finishes abovementioned have been used in commerce, they are limited to a two-dimensional representation of a three-dimensional surface, which in many cases is not completely adequate or, even more, not substantially similar to the surrounding surface of the ceiling where the loudspeaker is intended to be installed.
A further known concept is a planar-type loudspeaker with a sheet of pre-molded polymer material bonded against the front surface of the loudspeaker, intended to simulate a ceiling tile. Although it could be considered as an improvement over two-dimensional methods previously cited, the added mass and rigidity of such sheet and the lamination effect caused by the bond between the diaphragm and the decorative sheet drastically deteriorates the overall performance of the loudspeaker. The foregoing, along with the added material cost, does not seem to provide an advantage over previous embodiments. Such example can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,312 issued to Amel Hill.
Yet, a further known method provides for molding the front surface of the diaphragm to take on the appearance of an acoustic tile, permitting unobtrusive installation of the loudspeaker in ceilings of commercial structures formed of like-appearing ceiling tiles. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,425,107, 5,539,835 and 5,693,917 issued to Alejandro Bertagni et al. This alternative does not affect the performance of the planar loudspeaker, and it is more cost-effective than the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,312 cited above, it does limit the ability to adapt the loudspeaker's appearance for a variety of acoustic tile configurations. Nonetheless, these prior approaches have a number of shortfalls, including sound reproduction, manufacturing and material costs, and integration into the ceiling.
Accordingly, there is a need for a planar diaphragm loudspeaker for use in a suspended ceiling grid that overcomes the aforementioned difficulties and allows for unobtrusive integration. The present invention fulfills this need.
Briefly, and in general terms, the present invention resides in a planar diaphragm loudspeaker suitable for unobtrusive integration in a suspended ceiling having a plurality of ceiling tiles. Preferably, the planar diaphragm of the loudspeaker has a textured outer surface configured to resemble the tiles of the suspended ceiling. The textured planar diaphragm is configured to provide high quality sound reproduction and is relatively easy and cost-effective to manufacture. The invention also resides in related methods of manufacturing.
More specifically, in a presently preferred embodiment, by way of example and not limitation, the diaphragm includes regions having densities to provide improved sound reproduction across the audio frequency spectrum, to include low, high and very high frequencies, and to further provide sufficient structural stiffness to the outside perimeter of the diaphragm, thereby eliminating the need of an outer frame and resilient suspension.
In another detailed aspect of a preferred embodiment, the loudspeaker is configured to be selectably flush mounted or tegular-drop mounted within the suspended ceiling, as needed. For example, the shroud and the diaphragm are each provided with a pattern of protuberances and indentations on their facing surfaces such that, when the shroud and diaphragm are mated in a first orientation, the loudspeaker is configured for flush mounting, and when the shroud and diaphragm are mated in a second orientation, the loudspeaker is configured for tegular-drop mounting.
For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages achieved over the prior art, certain advantages of the invention have been described herein above. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope of the invention herein disclosed. These and other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments having reference to the attached figures, the invention not being limited to any particular preferred embodiment disclosed.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
The invention will now be described with reference to the presently preferred embodiments shown in the drawings, which are provided only as examples to illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The embodiments are not shown or described in more detail than necessary to describe the invention, and the manner and process of making and using it, to those skilled in the art. In the drawings:
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
In other exemplary embodiments, the planar diaphragm can be suitably constructed of closed-cell extruded or foamed polymer materials, either with or without additional skins, or only skinned on the exposed surface. Examples of polymer composite materials currently available in the market and suitable for use as a diaphragm are Kapa-Bloc® (expanded polyurethane core), Sintra® (expanded polyvinyl-chloride core), Foam-X® (extruded polystyrene core), Fome-Cor® (extruded polystyrene core), Gator-Flex® (extruded polystyrene core), Gator-Foam® (polystyrene foam core), Gator-Lite® (polystyrene foam core), Gator-Plast® (polystyrene foam core), Jet-Mount® (polystyrene foam core), Jet-Print® (polystyrene foam core) and ValuBoard® (extruded polystyrene core), available from Alcan Composites Inc. of Statesville, N.C. Skin materials for these polymers include but are not limited to paper, wood veneer, melamine and polystyrene. Other types of foamed polymer materials—either with or without skins—include expanded polyethylene foam, phenolic foam, polyisocyanurate foam, polyolefin foam, semi-rigid polyurethane foam with integral skins and microcellular foams. Most of these materials can be shape-formed and are also available in sheet-form of various sizes, thickness and densities for further machining to specific shapes, if required. Examples of such materials include: Airex® (polyetherimide closed cell thermoplastic foam core), Airlite-Herex® (cross-linked polyvinyl chloride closed-cell foam core) and Kapex® (modified polyurethane closed cell foam core) available from Alcan/Baltek Corp. of Northvale, N.J.; Klegcell® (cross-linked polyvinyl chloride rigid closed cell foam), Divinycell® (cross-linked polyvinyl chloride rigid closed cell foam) and TBR® (cross-linked polyvinyl chloride rigid closed cell foam) available from DIAB International of DeSoto, Tex.; PolyCore® (rigid polyisocyanurate foam core), Thermo-Cor® (rigid closed cell phenolic foam) and Epoxycore® (cross-linked novolacepoxy resin (hybrid phenolic/urethane)) available from American Foam Technologies of Lewisburgh, W. Va.; Last-A-Foam® (closed cell, flame retardant foam) available from General Plastics Manufacturing Co. of Tacoma, Wash.; Plasticell® (closed cell phenolic foam), Permaglass® (fire resistant glass fiber/phenolic laminate) available from Permali Gloucester Ltd. of Gloucester, UK; and Wilsonart® (solid phenolic core panels) available from Wilsonart International of Temple, Tex.
A. Textured Front Surface
1. Textured Impressions
In various exemplary methods of manufacture, a blank diaphragm with a substantially solid and uniform front surface is subjected to a secondary operation. Such operation produces a series of perforations and/or indentations in the form of holes and/or grooves, which are intended to imitate the perforated and/or fissured patterns generally found on commercial ceiling tiles. The exemplary methods to achieve such surface condition encompass a fixture in which the planar loudspeaker diaphragm is fixed with its exposed surface in an upwards position.
One approach is to place the fixture on a guided conveyor moving at particular speed and advances under a cylindrical barrel that rolls around its axis, whereas the barrel contains the reversed pattern over its surface. When the barrel surface becomes in contact with the diaphragm it transfers its pattern to the diaphragm surface, ultimately in the form of holes and/or grooves. Such pattern may be detachably fastened to the barrel surface and can be interchangeable, allowing for various designs to be used in the same equipment, as well as facilitating eventual repair. In addition, each pattern design can be made of a plurality of smaller components placed one against each other, but ultimately providing the same result as if it was a single component.
In another approach, the fixture is placed under an embossing press containing a plate. Such plate carries the reverse pattern over its surface. When the plate is actuated so as to move downwards and its surface becomes in positive contact with the diaphragm, it transfers its pattern to the diaphragm surface, ultimately in the form of holes and/or grooves. Obviously, a combination of a moving base and a smaller pressing plate may be desired to reduce equipment costs or to lessen the force applied to the diaphragm surface at a single time. As previously cited, such pattern or patterns may be detachably fastened to the pressing plate surface and are interchangeable, for the same reasons explained above.
The desired pattern may be placed on a template facing upwards, while the diaphragm is placed over this template with the exposed surface facing down. Subsequently, a plate located above the diaphragm moves down until it applies a certain amount of pressure over the rear of the diaphragm, which in turn transfers the pattern design into the diaphragm's front surface. The benefits of interchangeability or multiple pattern components hereby apply for the same reasons previously explained above.
The isometric sketch of
An additional method, depicted in
As shown on
2. Paste-Like Application of Textured Material
With reference to
The application procedures depicted in
3. Painted Application of Textured Material
A third method to provide a textured diaphragm comprises a flat diaphragm with a substantially solid and uniform front surface to which a water-based adhesive is sprayed-on or applied by roller or brush over the front surface. After the application of such adhesive and before the adhesive dries, a powdery or fiber-like compound is evenly dispersed over the entire front surface of the diaphragm, becoming permanently adhered to the contact surface. Such powdery compound can be a granular, pebbled-like powder substance, crushed mineral rock, sand, perlite, gypsum or other inorganic materials, as well as other lightweight artificial products. Such fiber-like compound may be chopped glass fibers or mineral fiber strands. The combination of compound size and density of application establish the desired surface texture. Once the adhesive is fully dried, the excess compound that did not adhere to the diaphragm surface is removed, and subsequently the new textured surface is painted to match the desired color.
Additionally, and as shown here in
As previously explained, the compound 37 can be granular or pebbled-like powder, crushed minerals or other inorganic materials, chopped glass fibers, mineral fiber strands or lightweight artificial products. The desired texture can be obtained by combining more than one of the materials, by increasing or decreasing the density of application of the compound over the surface—either by varying the size of the screen or mesh of the compound application container or by multiple passes over the surface—or by using different fiber or granule sizes.
4. Etching Solvent
A fourth method to obtain a textured three-dimensional appearance over the exposed surface of the loudspeaker's diaphragm is to spray a solvent-based emulsion that etches the surface to be treated and consequently takes on the appearance of other textured materials. Once the desired texture is attained, which can be controlled by the mix-ratio between the etching solvent and a neutral carrier, the surface can be finished with latex-based paint to obtain the desired color.
Referring to
5. Machine Etching
A fifth method described to obtain a three-dimensional appearance over the exposed surface of the loudspeaker's diaphragm comprises a fixture that holds the diaphragm in place with its exposed surface in an upwards position, while a computer-controlled routing machine with interchangeable tooling pieces is supported by a gantry over the fixture and moves along the “x” and “y” axis, and where such routing machine can also move over the “z” axis allowing for precise, elaborate geometric designs to be made over the diaphragm's surface.
An alternative procedure adopted to create a specific geometric design over the front surface 14 of a planar diaphragm 10 as shown in FIG. 10—or as previously shown on FIGS. 3E/3F—involves a table 60 containing a fixture 61 that holds the planar diaphragm 10 with the exposed front surface 14 facing upwards, and where a computer-controlled routing machine 62 with interchangeable tooling pieces 63 is mounted on a gantry 64 over the part to be routed, and where such gantry 64 moves along the “x” axis 65 and “y” axis 66, and where such routing 62 machine can also move over the “z” axis 67 allowing for precise, elaborate geometric designs to be made over the diaphragm surface 14. Within the scope of this embodiment, such geometric design can be implemented in the same manner herein explained, but instead, on a thin sheet of polymer material 41 which is further adhesively and permanently applied over the diaphragm surface 14. Examples of such geometric designs can be found on FIG. 3E and
The surface treatment example shown on
6. Secondary Sheets
In yet another embodiment, a thin sheet of polymeric cellular material such as expandable polystyrene is applied of over the exposed surface of the diaphragm. In this particular embodiment, such sheet has been previously perforated and/or indented or routed, by one of the process previously explained (refer to the first method) and thereafter is adhesively applied over the flat, untreated front surface of the speaker's diaphragm. Although the process to perforate, indent or route the material surface and the ending result may be similar, this approach allows for an alternative method that may be more suitable for particular manufacturing procedures, and with no substantial detriment of sound reproduction.
Additionally, a surface treatment for a planar loudspeaker is depicted in
It also has to be noted that any of above-explained three-dimensional surface treatments renders a surface that is less reflective than a painted or paper-faced planar loudspeaker front surface. Such three-dimensional surface reduces environmental noise reverberation and improves workspace effectiveness in open plan offices. Therefore, it can be said that an outcome from the basic objective of this invention is also a contributing factor to the acoustical properties of a room, when compared to prior planar loudspeaker art.
Finally,
Yet another method hereby characterized not only renders an aesthetic advantage over prior art but an acoustic solution as well, in which a non-woven, sound absorptive fabric adhesively applied over the exposed surface of the diaphragm. Although the concept of applying fabric over the diaphragm's surface has been contemplated in the prior art (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,596,733 and 3,779,336) such fabric was intended to be used for decorative purposes only. The current alternative defines the use of fabric to aesthetically match the surrounding ceiling tiles, while at the same time the non-woven, sound absorptive fabric applied over the diaphragm's exposed surface improves the acoustic properties of the room where the loudspeaker is installed. Such improvement is manifest as a better noise reduction coefficient and speech articulation in open plan offices.
Essentially, the above-explained methods are advantageous for many reasons. For example, a three-dimensional diaphragm surface that accurately replicates the surrounding ceiling tiles, regardless of the method hereby described to obtain such appearance, is more desirable than a painted or screen-printed surface. Furthermore, applying the three-dimensional surface treatment directly over a plain diaphragm simplifies the manufacture and stocking of parts, since a single, plain diaphragm can be converted into a variety of available patterns or textures on an “as-needed” basis.
B. Loudspeaker Shroud
In reference to FIG. 14A and
Installation of the loudspeaker is in compliance with the requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC) to protect building occupants from electrical shock in case of building collapse, among other things, and the provisions of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 90-A and in compliance with UL Standard 2043. Without further explanation or details as to such requirements and/or standards—which are hereby mentioned just for reference—it must be noted that ceiling loudspeakers may require a metallic enclosure behind the ceiling surface to be in compliance with local building, electrical and/or fire codes. A planar speaker installed in a ceiling that is part of an air-handling system may or may not need an enclosure depending on the materials employed to manufacture such product, and the product of combustion (flammability, smoke and heat release) of such materials.
Such indentations 71 are arranged in two pentagons, being one of them of a smaller radius. The loudspeaker diaphragm 100 has a set of indentations 101 and protuberances 102 that match the position of the indentations 71 formed in the shroud 70. The latter are arranged in an array with 72 degrees angular offset. To achieve the desired flush or tegular-drop effect once a speaker is installed in a ceiling, both components—diaphragm 100 and shroud 70—need to be specifically oriented one respect to the other so as to match the proper combination of indentations. Rotating the diaphragm 100 at 90° intervals allows for multiple settings, as further explained. On a first embodiment, an integrated enclosure 104 and shroud 105 covers the entire rear of the loudspeaker—as shown on FIG. 15A—and also contains the indentations 71 required to allow the loudspeaker to be further installed flush-mounted or at pre-determined tegular-drop settings.
An alternative embodiment is presented—FIG. 15B—where the enclosure is a separate component from the shroud 70 that covers the rear of the loudspeaker. Such embodiment not only allows the same flush-mount or tegular-drop options mentioned before, but also permits the use of different enclosures 106-107, giving more flexibility or installation options.
Typically, suspended ceilings grids have two types of exposed tees, as shown in the enlarged views of FIG. 16A. Such are known as 9/16″ tees 97 or 15/16″ tees 98, whereas the dimension indicates the width of the tee profile (in inches) and whereas each type is to be interfaced with the corresponding ceiling tile profile for a proper match. The flush-mount or tegular drop settings explained herein are applicable to either type of tee profiles.
Going back to the flush or tegular-drop settings that can be obtained by particularly arranging the indentations 71 of the shroud 70 or the indentations 71 of the integrated enclosure and shroud 105 respect to the recesses 101 or protuberances 102 in the rear surface 103 of the diaphragm 100, a first position is identified where the loudspeaker is to be set for a flush-mount 110 installation. Such setting is illustrated on FIG. 16B and FIG. 16C.
By rotating the shroud 70 or integrated enclosure and shroud 105 90° with respect to the diaphragm position (a second position), the loudspeaker front surface now matches a ceiling system with a tegular-drop 111 of ⅛″. Such setting is illustrated on FIG. 16D and FIG. 16E. By rotating the shroud 70 or integrated enclosure and shroud 105 another 90° clockwise (a third position), the loudspeaker front surface now matches a ceiling system with a tegular-drop 112 of ¼″. Such setting is illustrated on FIG. 16F and FIG. 16G. By rotating the shroud 70 or integrated enclosure and shroud 105 another 90° clockwise (a fourth position), the loudspeaker front surface now matches a ceiling system with a tegular-drop 113 of ⅜″. Such setting is illustrated on FIG. 16H and FIG. 16J.
C. Diaphragm Densities
As previously mentioned, the diaphragm may include regions of different densities. Beneficially, multiple densities provide improvements in sound quality in the low and high frequency portions of the audio bandwidth. In addition, the diaphragm may include an outer region, having a density of at least 5 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) about the periphery region of the diaphragm to provide structural stiffness, thus eliminating the need of an outer frame and resilient suspension. Moreover, related methods of manufacture provide a product that is easier and less costly to manufacture, while it has a reduced component count.
Alternatively,
The present invention has been described above in terms of presently preferred embodiments so that an understanding of the present invention can be conveyed. However, there are other methods, finishes and/or configurations for planar diaphragm loudspeakers not specifically described herein for which the present invention is applicable. Therefore, the present invention should not to be seen as limited to the form shown, which is to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive. Accordingly, the invention is defined only by the claims set forth below.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/421,718, filed Oct. 28, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1990409 | Lawrance | Feb 1935 | A |
2531634 | Lawrance | Nov 1950 | A |
2657758 | Varnet | Nov 1953 | A |
3046362 | White | Jul 1962 | A |
3073411 | Bleazey et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3596733 | Bertagni | Aug 1971 | A |
3674109 | Murase | Jul 1972 | A |
3722617 | Bertagni | Mar 1973 | A |
3737005 | Tontini | Jun 1973 | A |
3779336 | Bertagni | Dec 1973 | A |
3792394 | Bertagni | Feb 1974 | A |
3801943 | Bertagni | Apr 1974 | A |
3834486 | Tsuge et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3912865 | Seebinger | Oct 1975 | A |
3991286 | Henricksen | Nov 1976 | A |
4003449 | Bertagni | Jan 1977 | A |
4013846 | Krawczak et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4040213 | Capaul | Aug 1977 | A |
4138593 | Hasselbach et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4184563 | Bertagni | Jan 1980 | A |
4252211 | Matsuda et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4257325 | Bertagni | Mar 1981 | A |
4328400 | Shimada et al. | May 1982 | A |
4413160 | Ohyaba et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4760510 | Lahti | Jul 1988 | A |
4769188 | Graham et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4820077 | Sawada et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4837838 | Thigpen et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4850023 | Yarush | Jul 1989 | A |
4891842 | Green | Jan 1990 | A |
4926962 | Graham et al. | May 1990 | A |
4928312 | Hill | May 1990 | A |
4933975 | Button | Jun 1990 | A |
4997058 | Bertagni | Mar 1991 | A |
5007707 | Bertagni | Apr 1991 | A |
5425107 | Bertagni et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5539835 | Bertagni et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5574796 | Keezer | Nov 1996 | A |
5690423 | Hentz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693917 | Bertagni et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5937073 | Van Gieson | Aug 1999 | A |
6015025 | McGrath et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6386315 | Roy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411723 | Lock et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6481173 | Roy et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510919 | Roy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
20030081800 | Klasco et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
59004400 | Jan 1984 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040129492 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60421718 | Oct 2002 | US |