This patent application claims priority to International Application PCT/EP01/08104 filed on Jul. 13, 2001.
This invention relates to the field of loudspeakers, and in particular to a planar loudspeaker comprising a light, thin soundboard that may be energized to produce multiple-reflected bending waves. A surrounding frame holds this board in an articulated manner, At least one driver is connected to and energizes the soundboard, and at least one bridge rigidly connects the at least one driver to the frame.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,701,359 discloses a rigid-panel-type loudspeaker that functions on the principle of a free piston, wherein the sound-radiating surface (e.g., a diaphragm) is rigid (e.g., like a piston). The sound-radiating surface does not effect any significant flexural vibrations in the operating frequency range, and the rigid panel provided as the sound-radiating surface is free (i.e., open and not enclosed by a cabinet in an airtight manner).
WO 97/09842 discloses multiresonance loudspeakers, wherein weakly attenuated bending waves occurring in the operating frequency range are reflected at the panel edges such that the diaphragm becomes a multiresonator in response to the formation of standing waves. Such multiresonance loudspeakers are also referred to as “multiresonance soundboards”, “bending-wave loudspeakers” or “distributed mode speakers.” In multiresonance loudspeakers the panel is usually also independent (i.e., not a component of a closed box).
The remaining types of electrodynamic panel drivers (see, for example, DE 199 409 30) may in principle be fixed to the panel in a floating design (i.e., without being supported by a frame). The mass of the magnet system then forms the dynamic counter-support for the application of force to the panel to be driven (principle of “seismic mass”).
If the panel is driven in such a way that the panel normal is oriented approximately vertically relative to gravity, then the heavy magnet systems of the drivers apply gravitational force to the panel through their crimps. Due to the low rigidity of the crimps, these undergo a creeping settling motion over time in response to gravity, thereby causing an eccentrically acting, irreversible misalignment of the voice coils. Although a settling of this type also occurs even in horizontal assemblies, such as in cover panels, the settling direction here is not in an eccentric (radial) direction but in the direction of the voice coil axis.
In order to prevent this destructive, eccentric creeping effect, the drivers in vertically operating planar loudspeakers are attached to so-called “bridges” in such a way that their weight is unable to exert any shear force on the panel. These bridges (also referred to as “traverses,” or “gantries”) are attached to frames, which in turn support the panel by its rim in a shear-resistant articulated manner.
Due to their relatively large span, a bridge of this type usually acts like a flat spring that forms a low-damping, spring-mass vibrational system. In the resonance frequency located in the bass range, this vibrational system (bridge resonator) exerts strong deflections without radiating any noticeable sound. The strong deflections in bridge resonance are able to overload the voice coil centering and ultimately destroy the driver.
Therefore, there is a need for a planar loudspeaker with protection against settling in which the dynamic side-effects of this settling protection are avoided.
A planar loudspeaker includes a bridge that is connected to a damping board. The bridge supports a driver and the damping board. The damping board is preferably rigid.
The bridge resonance frequency may be tuned here by, for example, adjusting mass. Specifically, the bridge resonance may be determined by the ratio of the spring constant to the total bridge mass including all elements attached to it. Independently of the damping provided by the board surface of the damping board, the mass may be modified by changing the thickness or the density of the damping board in such a way that the radiative contribution of the damping board integrates in a positive manner into the acoustic spectrum of the multiresonance loudspeaker.
In an example of an alternative approach, the bridge resonance frequency may be tuned by adjusting the spring. Independent of the damping provided by the board surface, the planar moment of inertia, and thus the spring constant, may, for example, be adjusted by modifying the cross-sectional profile of the bridge in such a way that the resonance zone of the bridge integrates in a positive manner into the acoustic spectrum of the multiresonance loudspeaker.
In a preferred approach, at least one bridge is created in the form of an air-permeable rigid frame. The at least one bridge may, however, also be created in the form of an airtight flat box cover.
The damping board preferably has a smaller area than the soundboard. In addition, a preferred approach implements the damping board using a light, extremely flexurally rigid sandwich construction. A sandwich construction of this type is known, for example, from EP 0 924 959.
In addition, the connection points between the bridge(s) and damping board may be located in the region of the node lines for the first two vibrational modes of the damping board. The damping board itself may also be an integral component of the at least one bridge.
The at least one bridge may be composed of a prismatic rod, wherein the bridge does not completely cover the area opposite the soundboard provided by the frame. In addition, the at least one bridge may be created in the form of a regular lattice and/or perforated panel.
In another modification of the invention, the at least one bridge may be elastically compliant and an integral component of an airtight flat box in which all external components of this flat box are themselves airtight, as well as interconnected in an airtight manner. The flat box here may have a bass reflex port (or also a bass reflex tube). At least one bridge may be in the form of a rigid panel and be connected to the damping board by a surrounding bridge crimp.
A chamber may also be attached to the flat box, wherein the chamber may also have a bass reflex port (or also a bass reflect tube). Alternatively, the chamber may also be airtight. In addition, the chamber may also have a passive radiator. In terms of its acoustic effect, the planar loudspeaker according to the invention may also be an asymmetric two-panel loudspeaker since the principal front soundboard facing the listener forms an acoustic multiresonance soundboard, while the smaller rear damping board facing away from the listener is, acoustically speaking, a rigid panel.
The degree of damping here may be directly adjusted by the surface area of the damping board. The larger the board, the greater the damping. Additional enhancement of the low-frequency sound radiation by the planar loudspeaker may be achieved by designing the damping board as a rigid panel, thereby not only damping the bridge resonance vibration but also simultaneously contributing to sound radiation in the low-frequency range. In free multiresonance soundboards, the low-frequency range is always degraded by a dipole short circuit. The additional sound radiation partially compensates this dipole short circuit.
A particular advantage of the asymmetrical two-panel loudspeaker relates to its simple driving technology. Whereas known monopole drivers (see DE 198 218 62) are composed of back-to-back single drivers, alternative side-by-side single drivers, or complex double voice-coil systems, a loudspeaker according to an aspect of the invention requires only at least one known conventional panel driver.
If the frame supporting the bridge(s) and soundboard is acoustically open, then in response to a counter-acting pumping motion of the two panels, the compressed or decompressed air flows through the frame openings so as to equalize the pressure. If alternatively, however, the frame is sealed such that the soundboard and damping board create radiative surfaces of an otherwise closed flat box, then the two panels work in a counter-acting manner in the low-frequency range. The arrangement of the two panels then forms a “low-frequency monopole radiator,” that is, a breathing sphere with partially inactive zones.
A preferred embodiment of such a flat-box arrangement ventilates the box in a controlled manner. To this end, one or more bass reflex ports are provided through which the interior air is able to exit in phase so as to obtain an improvement in the bass response. The ventilation of the flat box simultaneously avoids the negative effect of excessively rigid air compliance.
In another preferred embodiment, the seal of the rigid damping board, located in the plane of the rear flat-box wall and originally not provided to effect sound radiation, may be in the form of an extended flat spring, thereby achieving an enlarged radiative surface along with an accompanying increase in radiative damping. This extended flat spring detunes the spring constant of the original bridge, a factor which must be considered during resonance tuning.
An advantage of the invention includes the fact that a settling protection that exhibits almost no damaging dynamic side-effects is able to be realized with relatively little complexity and expense. In addition, the implementation according to the invention generates an additional acoustic radiation in an otherwise inadequately provided bass frequency range.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The asymmetrical two-panel loudspeaker 1 also includes a damping board 14 that is attached to the bridge 5 and opposite soundboard 2. The large planar surface of the damping board 14 is aligned in a plane roughly parallel to the large planar surface of the soundboard 2.
Instead of using a bass reflex tube 23, the second chamber 28 may be closed, or have a passive radiator 29.
The illustrations have been discussed with reference to functional blocks identified as modules and components that are not intended to represent discrete structures and may be combined or further sub-divided. In addition, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the invention is not restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP01/08104 | 7/13/2001 | WO | 00 | 8/9/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/013186 | 2/13/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5701359 | Guenther et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6275598 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6622817 | Bachmann et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6925191 | Petroff et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956957 | Azima et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19940930 | Mar 2001 | DE |
1052879 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2000050384 | Feb 2000 | JP |
WO 9952322 | Oct 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050031155 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |