1. Technical Field
This disclosure relates generally to optical communication systems and, more specifically to planar waveguides that include in-line mirrors, beam splitters and anti-reflective films formed using voids or slits cut in the waveguide structure and transverse to the axis of the waveguide.
2. Description of the Related Art
The demand for increased bandwidth in fiber optic telecommunications has driven the development of sophisticated transmitter lasers suitable for dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) that require the concurrent propagation of multiple data streams through a single optical fiber. Each data stream is created by a modulated output of a semiconductor laser at a specific channel frequency or wavelength. The multiple modulated outputs are combined onto the single fiber.
The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) presently requires channel separations of approximately 0.4 nanometers, or about 50 GHz, which allows up to 128 channels to be carried by a single fiber within the bandwidth range of currently available fibers and fiber amplifiers. Greater bandwidth requirements will likely result in smaller channel separations in the future.
DWDM systems for telecommunications have largely been based on distributed feedback (DFB) lasers. DFB lasers are stabilized by a non-adjustable wavelength selective grating. Unfortunately, statistical variations associated with the manufacture of individual DFB lasers results in a distribution of wavelength channel centers. Hence, to meet the demands for operation and temperature sensitivity during operation on the fixed grid of telecom wavelengths complying with the ITU grid, DFBs have been augmented by external reference etalons or filters and require feedback control loops. Variations in DFB operating temperatures permit a range of operating wavelengths enabling servo control. However, conflicting demands for high optical power, long lifetime, and low electrical power dissipation have prevented use of DFB's in applications that require more than a single channel or a small number of adjacent channels.
Continuously tunable external cavity lasers (ECL) or external cavity diode lasers (ECDL) have been developed to overcome the limitations of individual DFB devices. Many laser tuning mechanisms have been developed to provide external cavity wavelength selection, such as mechanically tuned gratings used in transmission and reflection. External cavity laser tuning must be able to provide a stable, single mode output at a selected wavelength while effectively suppressing lasing associated with external cavity modes that are within the gain bandwidth of the cavity. Achieving these goals typically has resulted in increased, size, cost, complexity and sensitivity in tunable external cavity lasers.
DBR lasers are very similar to DFB lasers. The major difference is that where DFB lasers have a grating within the active region of the cavity, DBR lasers have a partitioned cavity with the grating in a region that is not active (i.e., amplifying). While this provides some isolation from the chirp effect inherent with DFB designs, the tuning characteristics of tunable DBR lasers still leave much to be desired.
The inherent advantage of the ECDL design over the highly integrated DFB and DBR designs is the fact that the tunable filter of the ECDL is decoupled from the gain region, and therefore can be made very stable. As a result, unlike DFB and DBR lasers, ECDL's may not require external wavelength lockers. The separate tuner in an ECDL may be controlled with essentially no cross-talk to other controlled parameters, such as laser diode current, and this can lead to simplified and more robust tuning algorithms than are typical of fully-integrated tunable lasers.
On the other hand, the lack of integration in the conventional ECDL design leads to additional parts or components and makes manufacturing of ECDL more labor-intensive and costly. In addition, phase control of existing ECDL designs is slow with respect to requirements for next-generation fast-tuning lasers.
Further, common waveguide splitters or combiners are of two distinct forms. First, gratings can be formed by manipulating waveguide dimensions and therefore alternating the propagation constant. The second type is or waveguide couplers which require significant space on a chip to avoid radiation losses due to bending. Gratings are limited to the small index contrast that is available, which can lead to a grating that is very low in reflectivity or which has a narrow bandwidth.
Mirrors or reflective surfaces are also very difficult to incorporate onto a chip as they present significant alignment problems. Specifically, it is very difficult to install and align conventional reflective devices in a ECL or ECDL device.
Various aspects and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will become apparent upon reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like or similar parts throughout the various views unless otherwise specified:
Embodiments of laser apparatuses that employ a semi-integrated designs including integrated structures with in-waveguide mirrors, beam splitters and anti-reflection membranes and methods for manufacturing the integrated structures are described herein. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide an understanding of disclosed embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the disclosed embodiments can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of this disclosure.
The disclosed embodiments described below employ a semi-integrated design for tunable lasers, such as external cavity tunable lasers. In order to better understand and appreciate aspects of these embodiments, a brief discussion of the operation and design of conventional external cavity tunable lasers is now presented.
Discrete wavelength tunable diode lasers typically comprise a semiconductor gain medium, two reflectors, and an intra-cavity tuning mechanism. For example, as an overview, a generalized embodiment of an external cavity diode laser (ECDL) 100 configured for optical communication is shown in
In addition to the ECDL cavity elements, a conventional communication laser of this type employs several output side elements used for isolation and data modulation. The output side elements illustrated in
The basic operation of ECDL 100 of
Light comprising the photons that exit the laser cavity through partially-reflective front facet 104 passes through diode output collimating lens 116, which collimates the light into a light beam 136. The output beam then passes through optical isolator 118. The optical isolator is employed to prevent back-reflected light from being passed back into the external laser cavity, and is generally an optional element. After the light beam passes through the optical isolator, it is launched into fiber pigtail 122 by fiber focusing lens 120. Generally, output fiber 122 may comprise a polarization-preserving type or a single-mode type such as SMF-28.
Through appropriate modulation of the input current (generally for communication rates of up to 2.5 GHz) or through modulation of an external element disposed in the optical path of the output beam (e.g., modulator 128, as shown in
The lasing mode of an ECDL is a function of the total optical path length between the cavity ends (the cavity optical path length); that is, the optical path length encountered as the light passes through the various optical elements and spaces between those elements and the cavity ends defined by partially-reflective front facet 104 and reflective element 114. This includes diode gain chip 102, diode intracavity collimating lens 108, tuning filter elements 110, plus the path lengths between the optical elements (i.e., the path length of the transmission medium occupying the ECDL cavity, which is typically a gas such as air). More precisely, the total optical path length is the sum of the path lengths through each optical element and the transmission medium times the coefficient of refraction for that element or medium. As discussed above, under a lasing mode, photons pass back and forth between the cavity end reflectors at a resonance frequency, which is a function of the cavity optical path length. In fact, without the tuning filter elements, the laser would resonate at multiple frequencies, producing a multi-mode output signal. Longitudinal laser modes occur at each frequency where the roundtrip phase accumulation is an exact multiple of 2π. For simplicity, if we model the laser cavity as a Fabry-Perot cavity, these frequencies can be determined from the following equation:
where λ=wavelength, L=optical length of the cavity, x=an arbitrary integer −1, 2, 3, . . . , and n=refractive index of the medium. The average frequency spacing can be derived from equation (1) to yield:
where v=c/λ and c is the speed of light. The number of resonant frequencies is determined from the width of the gain spectrum. The corresponding lasing modes for the cavity resonant frequencies are commonly referred to as “cavity modes,” an example of which is depicted by cavity modes 200 in
Semiconductor laser gain media typically have broad gain spectra and therefore require spectral filtering to achieve single longitudinal mode operations (i.e., operations at a single wavelength or frequency). In order to produce an output at a single frequency, filtering mechanisms are employed to substantially attenuate all lasing modes except for the lasing mode corresponding to the desired frequency. As discussed above, in one scheme a pair of etalons, depicted as a grid generator 111 and a channel selector 112 in
Ideally, during operation the transmission peaks remained fixed, hence the term “static” etalon; in practice, it may be necessary to employ a servo loop (e.g., a temperature control loop) to maintain the transmission peaks at the desired location. Since the cavity length for the grid generator is less than the cavity length for the laser cavity, the spacing (in wavelength) between the transmission peaks is greater for the grid generator than that for the cavity modes. A set of transmission peaks 202 corresponding to an exemplary etalon grid generator is shown in
A channel selector, such as an adjustable etalon, is employed to select the lasing mode of the laser output. For illustrative purposes, in one embodiment channel selector 112 may comprise an etalon having a width substantially less than the etalon employed for the grid generator. In this case, the FSR of the channel selector is substantially larger than that of the grid generator; thus the band pass waveform of the channel selector is broadened, as illustrated by channel selector band pass waveform 204 having a single transmission peak 206. In accordance with this channel selection technique, a desired channel can be selected by aligning the single transmission peak of the channel selector (e.g. 206) with one of the transmission peaks of the grid generator. For example, in the illustrated configuration depicted in
In addition to the foregoing scheme, several other channel selecting mechanisms may be implemented, including rotating a diffraction grating; electrically adjusting a tunable liquid crystal etalon; mechanically translating a wedge-shaped etalon (thereby adjusting its effective cavity length); and “Vernier” tuning, wherein etalons of the same finesses and slightly different FSRs are employed, and a respective pair of transmission peaks from among the transmission peaks defined by the etalons are aligned to select the channel in a manner similar to that employed when using a Vernier scale.
As discussed above, other types of tunable laser designs have been considered and/or implemented. In addition to DFB lasers, these include Distributed Bragg Reflector (DBR) lasers. Both DBR and DFB lasers are considered “integrated” lasers because all of the laser components are integrated in a common component. While this is advantageous for manufacturing, an integrated scheme means tuning is coupled to laser diode operation. This results in lower tuning quality when compared with ECDLs.
For example, DFB lasers have a problem with aging. More specifically, as a DFB laser is used, the characteristics of the gain section change over time. This phenomena is known as “aging.” Aging results in a wavelength shift, since the frequency reference and the active gain section are coupled in one chip. In contrast, the frequency reference (i.e., filter elements) are de-coupled from the gain chip for ECDL's, providing improved frequency stability over time. Another advantage of ECDLs over DFB lasers is spectral characteristics. The much longer lasing cavity in ECDLs provides very narrow line width and very good side-mode suppression ratios.
In general, the set of ECDL cavity element 304 will be substantially analogous to those discussed above with reference to
The outputs side elements 306 for the semi-integrated ECDL laser 302 is analogous to those described above with reference to
Still referring to
The integrated structure 302 includes a non-reflective front facet 411 and a non-reflective rear facet 412. To make the facets non-reflective, an appropriate anti-reflective coating 414 is applied to each of non-reflective facets 411 and 412 in a manner similar to that discussed above for non-reflective facet 106 of
The integrated structure 302 share similar qualities with respect to how the waveguide 406 is configured at the junctions between the phase control (if included), gain, mirror, and modulator sections. In particular, the configuration of the waveguide 406 is such that it is angled (i.e., non-perpendicular) relative to each of front and rear facets 411 and 412, and at the junctions between the various sections. Furthermore, the integrated structure 302 employs a tilted waveguide geometry. That is, in this configuration the plane in which mirror 410 is formed is tilted at an angle relative to the crystalline plane structure of the substrate material from which integrated structure 302 is formed.
The angled and perpendicular waveguide/facet interfaces are configured as such to take advantage of well-known optical phenomena. More specifically, the optical phenomena concern the behavior of light as it passes between two materials having different indexes of refraction. Depending on the difference between the refractive indexes and angle of incidence, varying amounts of incident power will be reflected back. In the case of normal incidence, substantially all the reflected light is coupled into the waveguide while in the case of the angled incidence (optimum is about 6°) most of the reflected light leaves the waveguide (gets scattered) and therefore does not interact with the cavity light.
With the foregoing optical phenomena in mind, the embodiment of
In the meantime, it is not desirable to have additional mirror elements in the laser cavity. Such elements may produce phase interferences, among other problems. Therefore, the angle of waveguide 406 is selected to be non-perpendicular at front and rear facets 411 and 412. In practice, a small portion of light is reflected at the interface plane between materials having dissimilar refractive indexes when the waveguide is tilted or bent. However, the angle tilt with respect to the facet planes provides mode mismatch for the reflected light, and thus doesn't create an interference with the lasing mode to which the laser is tuned.
In an embodiment, the mirror 408 may be formed by using a focused ion beam (FIB). FIB systems operate in a similar fashion to a scanning electron microscope (SEM) except, rather than using a beam of electrons, FIB systems use a finely focused beam of gallium ions that can be operated at low beam currents for imaging or high beam currents for site specific sputtering or milling.
The results of an exemplary FIB milling process that is employed to form a 0.06 micrometer (μm) gap in the ridge waveguide of a gain medium structure is shown in
FIB systems employ a sputtering technique for performing machining of substrates. The gallium (Ga+) primary ion beam hits the substrate surface and sputters a small amount of material, which leaves the surface as either secondary ions (i+ or i−) or neutral atoms (n0). The primary beam also produces secondary electrons (e−). At low primary beam currents, very little material is sputtered; under this type of operation, an FIB system may be used for imaging, and can achieve 5 nm imaging resolution. At higher primary currents, a great deal of material can be removed by sputtering, allowing precision milling of the specimen down to a sub-micron scale.
FIB systems are able to produce material “cuts” with very-high aspect ratios (cut depth vs. width). However, the sputtering technique does not produce a perfect high-aspect ratio cut. Rather, a kerf is formed, having a greater width at the top of the cut, with the kerf becoming narrower with increasing depth. Ideally, the sidewalls formed by the FIB cut should be (substantially) perpendicular proximate to the section of the cut passing through the waveguide, although some imperfections are tolerable.
Another technique for producing an in-waveguide mirror is to define one or more low-aspect ratio “trenches” through the core of the waveguide, and then backfill the trenches with a material having an appropriate (selectable) index of refraction. As discussed in co-pending application Ser. No. 11/023,711, the number of trenches will generally be dependent on the selected backfill material in view of the desired level of reflectivity to be obtained and the waveguide geometry.
The approach illustrated in
Thus, as shown in
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternative embodiments and various modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
This is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/023,711, filed on Dec. 28, 2004, still pending.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11023711 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11171135 | Jun 2005 | US |