The present invention relates to a watercraft, and particularly, to a watercraft hull having a very high deadrise central planing hull portion including longitudinal flat planing steps or panels.
Watercraft which are designed to operate in the planing mode are well known. Empirical evidence based on naval architecture and hydro-dynamic research, testing and experimentation has established beneficial performance attributes from three important features of such watercraft.
First, flat bottom planing hull surfaces with 0 degree deadrise angles are known to achieve the most efficient planing lift forces when operating at optimal trim angles. A watercraft utilizing flat planing surfaces will therefore generate more efficient planing lift than one with planing surfaces with higher deadrise. However, conventional wisdom is that a watercraft with exclusively flat planing surfaces cannot achieve high seakeeping and seakindliness in rough seas.
Watercraft with a relatively flat or shallow V planing hull bottom, as measured relative to the horizontal, have efficient planing lift and are very stable, but have very poor seakeeping in rough seas, i.e., they also lack seakindliness and directional stability in rough seas.
Consequently, watercraft with a deep V hull bottom were developed to introduce better seakeeping and directional stability. The hulls of such boats, as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,237,581 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,085,535, are typically “V” shaped in cross section, with each leg of the V being generally flat and forming an angle to the horizontal, known as the deadrise angle, of approximately 20 to 30 degrees. The deadrise increases toward the forward end of the boat, and as a general rule, has a deadrise greater than 43 degrees at the bow to provide a fine entry. As such boats move forward in the water the narrow bow entry slices through the water, while the flatter surfaces aft provide some planing area, providing a balance between planing lift and seakeeping.
The planing lift for conventional deep-V hulls is typically augmented by the provision of running strakes on the hull surfaces as shown in
Despite the improvements found with the deep V hull design, planing boats can provide uncomfortable rides. With too high a running trim, the bow pitches up over the crest of the wave, then plunges downward slamming back to the free surface. Another type of slamming occurs when the hull completely leaves the water, and is called re-entry slamming.
Conventional deep-V hulls will have excellent seakeeping if they can be controlled to run at speed with low trim while remaining upright (i.e., not heeled to either side). The stable mode of operation with the waterflow along the hull is shown in
When a deep-V boat heels to either side, its effective deadrise is decreased by the heel angle such that it loses the low slamming benefits of a deep-V hull. For example, a 24 degree deadrise hull heeled over by 10 degrees becomes a 14 degree deadrise hull normal to the water surface. In very high seas, it is not atypical for a small craft to experience up to 15 degrees of heeling so that the effective 9 degree deadrise surface is relatively flat to the water and pounds in waves, as illustrated in
A particularly dangerous condition in which to have excessive roll is when turning in rough seas from a head to a quartering to a beam sea. Heeling over during this maneuver causes excessive pounding and uncomfortable to dangerous levels of roll.
A steeper deadrise than conventional deep V hulls would greatly improve the seakeeping and seakindliness of the hull. Even when heeled over, the surface of a deeper V hull will retain a significant deadrise relative to the water surface and thus cushion any impacts. Furthermore, the higher deadrise hull has less pitch excitation, thus allowing the hull forebody to penetrate the wave rather than kiting off of it. One such example is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,415,213. However, it appears that several problems must be resolved before a planing monohull with an extremely high deadrise can be successfully reduced to practice. For example, an extremely deep V hull has greater stability problems than a deep V being even more tender in roll. Further, although the orientation of its surfaces relative to the water improves its seakeeping and seakindliness, an extremely deep V hull also produces far less dynamic lift than a flatter hull. The inadequate planing lift of a deeper V makes getting over critical speed, also called hump speed, more difficult, reduces the payload capacity, and increases operating draft. In addition, the limited hull width of an extremely deep V restricts arrangements and has low internal volume.
Also, narrow watercraft hulls with ultra high deadrise angles greater than 50 degrees and typically greater than 60 degrees in forward sections are known to transit through waves by penetrating and slicing into them with less heave and pitch vertical motion excitation than a hull with lesser deadrise, thereby improving a watercraft's seakeeping and seakindliness. The hull can have sufficient vertically arranged and increasing buoyant volume to provide progressive lift to counter hull plunging motions when transiting through wave troughs; however, conventional wisdom on these vessels is that a watercraft with ultra high deadrise panels cannot achieve high lift and planing efficiencies.
Finally, monohulls, with higher fineness ratios, improve seakeeping of watercraft but can have static and dynamic stability issues as well as non-optimal running trims. However, conventional wisdom is that a narrow planing hull is not as efficient as a wider hull and cannot carry as heavy loads. But, watercraft with entrapment tunnels and amas improve a narrow vessel's stability at rest or at speed and improve the vessel's ability to achieve critical planing speeds and carry high loads.
It is an object of this invention to provide a novel watercraft planing hull with improved seakeeping and seakindliness (in rough seas), seaworthiness, stability, planing efficiency, and payload capacity.
It is also an object of this invention to improve boat handling by providing a planing hull that produces fully banked turns and eliminates heeling and chine walking.
It is another object of the invention to provide a watercraft hull that will operate with substantially lower slamming than a conventional deep-V hull, especially when the hull hits the water surface heeled to a side when the hull is not symmetrically upright.
Such a craft could find use in military, commercial, and recreational boating markets, or in other words, applications that require a high seakeeping, high payload capacity craft that is able to maintain its speed and course in a seaway without excessive slamming or discomfort to the crew.
The subject of this invention is a watercraft hull formed with at least one pair of flat planing panels, also referred to herein as a “longitudinal step”, which have substantially 0 degree deadrise angles and at least a pair of ultra high deadrise (UHD) panels associated therewith and connected to a pad keel, with a fine bow entry, and hard chine. The watercraft hull may also include a pair of outboard amas or sponsons that are symmetric about the hull centerline.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention an entrapment tunnel monohull watercraft is provided that has a central hull portion formed of at least a pair of relatively flat panels having substantially 0 degree deadrise on opposite sides of the hull's centerline and a pair of ultra high deadrise panels associated therewith having deadrise of 50° or greater throughout the length of the hull. The ultra high deadrise panel arrangement improves seakeeping and seakindliness while maintaining the directional stability and performance for which entrapment tunnel hulls are well known.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention the described hull may include relatively flat panels (when viewed in transverse cross section), referred to herein as “fillet panels”, bridging the flat 0 degree deadrise panels defining the longitudinal steps and adjacent ultra high deadrise panels and whose deadrise is between 20 degrees and 35 degrees at the transom. These fillet panels taper to blend into the UHD panels and the flat panels or longitudinal steps going forward to provide more width for more favorable arrangements and better maneuvering capabilities, while staying consistent with the seakeeping and seakindliness features of the hull.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention the described hull features longitudinal steps that are relatively flat and substantially wide planing panels as integral parts of the hull having deadrise of about 0 degrees and variable widths in order to augment planing lift, improve seakindliness, and optimize efficiency.
A still further aspect of this invention is a planing watercraft with a hull form designed to be seaworthy, seakindly, stable and efficient when operating in rough seas that is comprised of generally flat panels to form planing surfaces with approximately 0 degree deadrise to which panels having ultra high deadrise angles greater than approximately 50 degrees are attached. The watercraft is symmetric about its hull centerline longitudinal axis with a fine entry bow, transom stern, hard chines with large planing flats, and a flat pad keel tapered towards the bow. The 0 degree deadrise surface defines at least one longitudinal hull step on each side of the hull configured between the pad keel and hard chines. Unlike existing planing craft, the planing stagnation lift line achieved by the hulls of the present invention is not a continuous line but rather a segmented one since the ultra high deadrise panels between stagnation planing lift surfaces provide relatively very little lift. It has been found that such a lift discontinuity can cause insufficient planing lift stability to the watercraft unless there are at least two stagnation lift planing surfaces between the pad keel and chine planing flats and the vertical offset between any two planing surfaces along the planing stagnation line is less than 6 inches. With the aforementioned longitudinal hull steps as the first stagnation lift planing surfaces, the second stagnation lift planing surface can be another longitudinal hull step with planing flats, triangular shaped running strakes or simple flat plate strips attached to the hull.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, high deadrise fillet panels 41 with deadrise angles between 20 and 35 degrees are attached between the ultra high deadrise panels that are attached to the sides of the pad keel and the lowest longitudinal hull step planing flats. The fillet panels 41 are employed to reduce peak slamming pressures attributable to the longitudinal step planing surface and reduce hull wetted surface area frictional drag and are tapered into wedges at their forward end to blend into the adjacent hull panels. In addition ventilated aft swept flow interrupters (VASFI) may be installed in the hull fillet panels 41 to improve seakeeping by maintaining an optimal running trim, to improve hull loading lift efficiency, to reduce hull wetted surface area frictional drag and to improve the watercraft's turning capabilities.
Still further, the watercraft may have one or more ventilated transverse hull steps. The steps improve seakeeping by maintaining an optimal running trim, improve hull loading lift efficiency and reduce hull wetted surface area frictional drag. Transverse steps that incorporate an aft sweep will also improve the watercraft's turning capabilities.
Transverse stability improving means may also be symmetrically attached to the watercraft outboard of the chine. The transverse stability improving means alternatives include entrapment tunnels, struts, amas, sponsons, demi-hulls, hydrofoils, lifting bodies, buoyancy collars including types that are inflatable, double chine hull panels and/or a combination thereof.
In another aspect of the invention, two or more hulls made according to the invention can be joined by a cross structure to form a multi-hulled watercraft.
In another aspect of the invention, the hull can be separated into two half hulls along the centerline longitudinal axis and each half made watertight. The two halves can be separated transversely from each other and joined by a cross structure to form an asymmetric catamaran.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent in the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments thereof when read in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
a is a front view of the hull of
b is also a front view of the hull of
a is a side view of a watercraft hull designed in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;
b is a front view of the watercraft hull shown in
c is a bottom view of the hull shown in
d is a bottom perspective view of the hull shown in
e is an aft view of the hull shown in
a is a side view of another embodiment of the present invention;
b is a front view of the embodiment of
c is a bottom view of the hull of
d is a bottom perspective view of the embodiment of
a is a side view of a third embodiment of the invention;
b is a bottom view of the embodiment of
c is a bottom exploded perspective view of the embodiment of
d is a transverse cross-section of the bottom of the hull of the embodiment of
e is a transverse cross-section of the forebody of the embodiment of
a is a side view of a fourth embodiment of the invention;
b is a bottom view of the embodiment of
c is a bottom exploded perspective view of the embodiment of
d is a transverse cross-section of the bottom of the hull of the embodiment of
e is a transverse cross-section of the forebody of the embodiment of
a and 8b are schematic cross-sectional views at the transom of a watercraft according to the present invention, similar to
c and 8d are similar views taken midship of the embodiment of
e and 8f are similar views to
a and 9b are bottom plan views of hull pressure patterns for hulls designed in accordance with the embodiments of the invention, shown in
a and 10b are bottom views of the hull wetting distribution on the hull bottoms of the embodiments of
a and 11b are bottom views of the hull wetting patterns for the embodiments of
a and 12b and 13a and 13b are respectively side and bottom views of the embodiments of
a and 14b are profile and bottom plan views, respectively, of a multi-hull watercraft designed in accordance with another embodiment of the invention, featuring a twin hull or catamaran using the hull structure of the embodiment of
a and 15b are profile and bottom plan views, respectively, of a multi-hull watercraft designed in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, featuring two half hull structures according to the embodiment of
Referring now to the drawings in detail,
As noted above, contemporary deep V hulls possess relatively good seakeeping characteristics; however, their abilities are limited and need much improvement. Seakeeping of such hulls remains acceptable when the conventional hull is controlled to run at speed with low trim while remaining upright as shown in
It has been found that at high speeds a deadrise between 50 and 65 degrees is required to mitigate slamming, particularly in the uppermost hull panels. In accordance with the present invention, the hull deadrise angle of the central planing hull portion is increased along its entire length such that it has enough deadrise to mitigate high speed slamming. In addition longitudinal planing steps are provided to provide planing lift surfaces.
a, 3b, 3c, 3d, and 3e, provide various views of a first embodiment of a watercraft hull 10 according to the present invention. Multiple embodiments of the invention are described hereinafter and common reference numerals are used in the specification and drawings to indicate like parts.
Hull 10 has a bottom 12 including a substantially flat pad keel portion 30 and a pair of angularly related flat panels 31, immediately outboard and adjacent to the pad keel 30, which are symmetric about the hull centerline 14. The flat pad keel has a generally uniform width in the aft half of the hull having a width of about 15 to 25% of the hull width at the outer hull chines as measured at the transom. The pad keel tapers from about amidship forward to its apex 40 and curves upwardly. The panels 31 possess an Ultra High Deadrise (UHD) significantly greater than a conventional V hull and they extend the full length of the pad keel 30 from the transom 16 to the pad keel apex 40 (
Hull 10 also includes one or more pairs of additional upper UHD panels which also are symmetrically located about the hull centerline. In the embodiment seen in
Watercraft hull 10 of this invention also includes a first pair of longitudinal steps, including longitudinal step 32 located immediately outboard and adjacent to the upper ends of UHD panels 31 symmetrically about the hull centerline. This first pair of longitudinal steps, including longitudinal step 32, form flat planing surfaces and have a deadrise of approximately 0 degrees at the transom and along their entire length. The width dimension of each step in the first pair of longitudinal steps, including longitudinal step 32, will vary with the length and width of the hull and their combined width may be 14% to 20% of the width at the hull chines as measured at the transom 16, and vertically spaced a dimension D (
As seen in
The innovative use of UHD panels and first pair of longitudinal steps and second pair of longitudinal steps, including longitudinal step 32 and longitudinal step 33, respectively as described above allows for the vessel to provide superior seakeeping, while maintaining turning and maneuvering capabilities and providing more width for favorable arrangements.
This is shown, for example, with reference to
As also seen in
An improved form of an entrapment tunnel was proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,418,915. The hull disclosed in that patent includes outboard amas which provide the benefits of mitigation of capsizing, efficient progressive lift, and improved directional stability for navigation course keeping.
An entrapment tunnel is formed in this embodiment between the hard chine 37 on the hull, the tunnel ceiling, and a depending ama. These surfaces may be shaped using a pair of splined curve shapes, or they may be constructed of relatively flat or curved panels 50, 51 (as shown in
Both the amas and both pairs of longitudinal steps, including longitudinal steps 32 and 33 provide transverse stability to help keep the hull upright both at rest and underway in tough seas. As noted above, a hull that remains upright provides superior seakeeping and seakindliness.
It is also noted that in this embodiment the roof of the tunnel 39 terminates in a step several feet forward of the transom 16 to allow for the placement of trim tabs in the aft end of the tunnels.
Referring now to
A further variation is also shown in
Referring now to
a-5e illustrate a preferred embodiment of the present invention in which the hull's hard chine and the forward end of the amas are carried forward to the bow to a straight bow portion at the top of the bow as seen in
d and 5e illustrate how the deadrise of the UHD panels and the width of the both pairs of longitudinal steps, including longitudinal steps 32 and 33, may vary moving forward in the hull.
a-6e illustrate another smaller embodiment of the invention whose pad keel 30 terminates forward of transom 16 defining an aft step 32′. At the transom the hull has a single UHD panel 34 on each side of the hull. At the step 32′ the pad keel 30 begins, as does the UHD panel 32 longitudinal step 33 and fillet panels 41. In this embodiment the forward portion of the hull includes the strakes 31′ previously described. In addition, because the height of the UHD panel 34 is greater than 6 inches between the step 33 and the chine 37 (but preferably less than 12 inches) an additional longitudinal strake 35 is provided to mitigate slamming as described above. In this case the strake is illustrated, as a flat plate member extending laterally from the hull with zero deadrise midway between chine 37 and step 33 from the bow to the transom.
As also seen in
c-8f are similar to previously described
a and 9b are bottom views of the hulls of
a and 10b are similar bottom views showing the wetted surface areas on the hulls of
As seen in
a and 11b are similar to
a and 12b and
A further variation of this invention includes multi-hull watercraft comprised of two or more hull structures designed according to this invention. For example,
Although illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described herein, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these specifically disclosed embodiments, but that various changes and modifications may be effected therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/439,105 filed Feb. 3, 2011 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/231,238 filed Sep. 13, 2011; the disclosures of both which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/231,238.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
928579 | Apel | Jul 1909 | A |
1559660 | Ward | Nov 1925 | A |
1656411 | Baldwin | Jan 1928 | A |
2020792 | Maynard et al. | Nov 1935 | A |
2735392 | Cox | Feb 1956 | A |
2989939 | Tatter | Jun 1961 | A |
3085535 | Hunt | Apr 1963 | A |
3148652 | Canazzi | Sep 1964 | A |
3203389 | Cale | Aug 1965 | A |
3237581 | Moesly | Mar 1966 | A |
3376840 | Zaphiriou et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3415213 | Nemetz | Dec 1968 | A |
3450090 | Best, Jr. | Jun 1969 | A |
3515087 | Stuart | Jun 1970 | A |
3702598 | Szptyman | Nov 1972 | A |
3709179 | Payne | Jan 1973 | A |
3760756 | Boden | Sep 1973 | A |
3796177 | Szpytman | Mar 1974 | A |
3937164 | Austin | Feb 1976 | A |
4022143 | Krenzler | May 1977 | A |
D244841 | Nescher | Jun 1977 | S |
D245902 | Rogers | Sep 1977 | S |
4091761 | Fehn | May 1978 | A |
D252507 | Wood | Jul 1979 | S |
4159691 | Paxton | Jul 1979 | A |
4263866 | Shirley | Apr 1981 | A |
4348972 | Parsons | Sep 1982 | A |
D267866 | Parsons | Feb 1983 | S |
D283416 | Carlson | Apr 1986 | S |
4584959 | Allison | Apr 1986 | A |
D285190 | Pipkorn | Aug 1986 | S |
D286870 | Fairchild | Nov 1986 | S |
4813366 | Elder | Mar 1989 | A |
4862817 | Hornsby, Jr. et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4989534 | Field | Feb 1991 | A |
D318041 | Meredith | Jul 1991 | S |
5140930 | Lund | Aug 1992 | A |
5163377 | Calderon et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5191849 | Labrucherie et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5237953 | Mannerfelt | Aug 1993 | A |
5265554 | Meredith | Nov 1993 | A |
D355881 | Carlson | Feb 1995 | S |
5402743 | Holderman | Apr 1995 | A |
5458078 | Perette | Oct 1995 | A |
5474014 | Russell | Dec 1995 | A |
5544609 | Miller | Aug 1996 | A |
5622130 | Calderon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5934218 | Chen | Aug 1999 | A |
5983823 | Allison | Nov 1999 | A |
6116180 | Thompson | Sep 2000 | A |
6186086 | Zender et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216622 | Lindstrom et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250245 | Robinson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6345584 | Mascellaro | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6526903 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
7201111 | Burkett | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7305926 | Seider | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7418915 | Campbell | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7845301 | Loui et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20010052314 | Chrunyk | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040103836 | Burkett | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2928634 | Nov 1980 | DE |
0058716 | Mar 1981 | DE |
0298050 | Jun 1988 | EP |
1047765 | Jul 1953 | FR |
1083742 | Jun 1954 | FR |
2078967 | Oct 1971 | FR |
1545900 | Jul 1976 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Triton Marine Brochure; copyright 1982; 4 pages. |
Powerboat Magazine, Sep. 1982; pp. 68-71; p. 98. |
Yacht and Boat Owner; Jun. 1981; Vortex a unique design concept; pp. 72-73. |
Practical Boat Owner, Aug. 1983; Get Up and Go!; pp. 50-51. |
Motor Boat and Yachting Jul. 1978; Blagg 480, p. 85. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120291686 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61439105 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13231238 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13445368 | US |