Plant gene conferring resistance to Tospoviruses

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0003] The present invention relates to a plant nucleic acid which confers resistance to plants to Tospoviruses, and uses thereof.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0004] Tospoviruses are thrips-transmitted viruses that belong to the genus Tospovirus (family Bunyaviridae) and cause substantial yield loss to ornamental and vegetable crops in several areas of the world (German et al., “Tospoviruses: Diagnosis, Molecular Biology, Phylogeny, and Vector Relationships,” Annu. Rev. of Phytopathol 30:315-348 (1992); Peters et al., “Vector Relations in the Transmission and Epidemiology of Tospoviruses. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:29-42 (1996)). The members of this genus are characterized by a genome comprised of three separate single stranded RNAs (S, M, and L RNAs) enveloped in a lipidic membrane and associated with two glycoproteins, G1 and G2 (German et al., “Tospoviruses: Diagnosis, Molecular Biology, Phylogeny, and Vector Relationships,” Annu. Rev. of Phytopathol 30:315-348 (1992); van Poelwijk et al., “Replication and Expression of the Tospovirus Genome. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tospovirus and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:201-208 (1996)). Based on serological properties, vector specificity, host range, and nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the nucleoprotein gene, several species have been established in the genus Tospovirus (de Ávila et al., “Classification of Tospoviruses Based on Phylogeny of Nucleoprotein Gene Sequences,” J. Gen. Virol 74:153-159 (1993); Goldbach et al., “Introduction. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:21-26 (1996); Peters et al., “Vector Relations in the Transmission and Epidemiology of Tospoviruses. In:

[0005] International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:29-42 (1996)). Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), tomato chlorotic spot virus (TCSV), impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV), and groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV) are the Tospovirus species commonly associated with important yield losses in the tomato crop. TSWV, the type species of the genus, has a worldwide distribution, whereas GRSV and TCSV have, thus far, only been identified on tomatoes grown in Brazil and Argentina (Dewey et al., “Molecular Diversity of Tospovirus in Argentina: A Summary. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:261-263 (1996); Peters et al., “Vector Relations in the Transmission and Epidemiology of Tospoviruses. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:29-42 (1996); Resende et al., “New Tospovirus Species Found in Brazil. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:78-89 (1996)). In Brazil, new tospovirus species that infect tomato are also being characterized (Resende et al., “New Tospovirus Species Found in Brazil. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:78-89 (1996)).

[0006] Because genetic resistance offers the best means of protecting crop plants against tospovirus infection, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of resistant varieties (Cho et al., “Conventional Breeding: Host-Plant Resistance and the Use of Molecular Markers to Develop Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Vegetables. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:367-378 (1996); Roselló et al., “Genetics of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus Resistance Coming From Lycopersicon peruvianum,” Eur. J. of Plant Path. 104:499-509 (1998)). Naturally occurring host resistance to tospoviruses has been reported in many Lycopersicon species (Finlay, “Inheritance of Spotted Wilt Resistance in Tomato. II. Five Genes Controlling Spotted Wilt Resistance in Four Tomato Types,” Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 6:153-163 (1953); Cho et al., “Conventional Breeding: Host-Plant Resistance and the Use of Molecular Markers to Develop Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Vegetables. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:367-378 (1996); Krishna Kumar et al., “Evaluation of Lycopersicum Germplasm for Tomato Spotted Wilt Tospovirus Resistance by Mechanical and Thrips Transmission,” Plant Dis. 77:938-941 (1993); Paterson et al., “Resistance in Two Lycopersicon Species to an Arkansas Isolate of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus,” Euphytica 43:173-178 (1989); Roselló et al., “Viral Diseases Causing the Greatest Economic Losses to the Tomato Crop. I. The Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus-A Review,” Scientia Horticulturae 67:117-150 (1996); Stevens et al., “Evaluation of Seven Lycopersicon Species for Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV),” Euphytica 80:79-84 (1994)). However, in many cases, this resistance is species and/or isolate specific and therefore not very useful for breeding purposes. Broad spectrum tospovirus resistance was found in the L. esculentum cultivar ‘Stevens’ (van Zijl et al., “Breeding Tomatoes for Processing in South Africa,” Acta Horticulturae 194:69-75 (1986)). The TSWV resistance of this cultivar, introgressed from an unknown L. peruvianum accession, is conferred by a single gene, Sw-5, which is incompletely dominant (Stevens et al., “Inheritance of a Gene for Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) From Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill,” Euphytica 59:9-17 (1992)). This gene also seems to provide resistance to TCSV and GRSV (Boiteux et al., “Genetic Basis of Resistance Against Two Tospovirus Species in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum),” Euphytica 71:151-154 (1993)).

[0007] Genes conferring resistance to different isolates of the same pathogen or different pathogens are often organized in the plant genome as tandem arrays of homologues (Hammond-Kosack et al., “Plant Disease Resistance Genes,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:575-607 (1997)). Therefore, the multiple resistances conferred by Sw-5 raise the question of whether the Sw-5 locus consists of a cluster of tightly linked genes, each gene having its own virus specificity, or whether it encodes a single gene product capable of recognizing several tospovirus isolates and species. In addition, the physiological mechanism by which Sw-5 provides resistance is unclear. In tomato plants carrying Sw-5, the virus cannot spread systemically throughout the plant; and, in many cases, the inoculated leaves do not show any macroscopic symptoms. However, for some tospovirus isolates and/or under high inoculum pressure, local and systemic necrotic lesions appear on the inoculated plants, suggesting that Sw-5 resistance can elicit a hypersensitive response (Stevens et al., “Inheritance of a Gene for Resistance to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) From Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill,” Euphytica 59:9-17 (1992); Brommonschenkel et al., “Map-based Cloning of the Tomato Genomic Region that Spans the Sw-5 Tospovirus Resistance Gene in Tomato,” Mol. Gen. Genet. 256:121-126 (1997); Roselló et al., “Genetics of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus Resistance Coming From Lycopersicon peruvianum,” Eur. J. of Plant Path. 104:499-509 (1998)). Sw-5 may also be developmentally regulated, as the resistance gene does not appear to provide tospovirus resistance in tomato fruits (de Haan et al., “Transgenic Tomato Hybrids Resistant to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus Infection. In: International Symposium on Tospoviruses, and Thrips of Floral and Vegetable Crops,” Acta Horticulturae 431:417-426 (1996)).

[0008] These unusual characteristics of Sw-5 and its tight linkage to RFLP marker CT220 on the long arm of tomato chromosome 9 led to the isolation of this gene via map-based cloning. By high resolution-genetic linkage analysis of Sw-5 recombinant plants and chromosome walking, it was demonstrated that the Sw-5 locus resides in a 100 kb genomic region spanned by 10 overlapping plant transformation-competent cosmid clones (Brommonschenkel et al., “Map-based Cloning of the Tomato Genomic Region that Spans the Sw-5 Tospovirus Resistance Gene in Tomato,” Mol. Gen. Genet 256:121-126 (1997); Tanksley et al, “High Density Molecular Linkage Maps of the Tomato and Potato Genomes,” Genetics 132:1141-1160 (1992)).

[0009] Tospoviruses causes substantial yield losses to ornamental and vegetable crops worldwide. TSWV is especially damaging to tomatoes in South America, Africa, and certain parts of Asia. No genes conferring resistance to this virus have been isolated. It would be useful to have a Tospovirus resistance gene in order to engineer virus resistant tomatoes and other crops.

[0010] The present invention is directed to overcoming this and related deficiencies in the art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0011] The present invention relates to an isolated plant nucleic acid molecule which imparts resistance in plants to Tospoviruses.

[0012] The present invention also relates to a protein, which may be purified or recombinant, which is encoded by the isolated nucleic acid of the present invention.

[0013] The present invention also relates to a method of imparting to a plant resistance to a Tospovirus which involves transforming a plant with a nucleic acid molecule under conditions effective to impart to the plant resistance to a Tospovirus.

[0014] The present invention also relates to a method of eliciting a hypersensitive response in a plant. This involves providing a transgenic plant which has been transformed with a nucleic acid molecule which imparts resistance in plants to Tospoviruses, and expressing the nucleic acid under conditions to elicit a hypersensitive response in the plant.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] FIGS. 1A-B show the positional cloning of the Sw-5 Tospovirus resistance locus. FIG. 1A shows the alignment of cosmid clones in the chromosome region around the RFLP marker CT220 that contains Sw-5, based on high resolution genetic linkage analysis. Horizontal lines represent the cosmid inserts contained within 10 overlapping cosmid clones. The circled letters R and S identify cosmid clones that either confer resistance (R) or fail to confer resistance (S) to tospoviruses upon mechanical inoculation. FIG. 1B shows fine mapping of Sw-5 inside cosmid TC134 by complementation analysis. Cosmid clone TC53 that overlaps with TC134 and lacks the TCD1-homologous region (horizontal line) fails to complement the susceptible phenotype of Moneymaker. Later sequence analysis showed that the genomic region containing Sw-5 (shown as diagonal lines) is truncated in both non-complementing cosmids TC53 and TC55.

[0016]
FIG. 2 shows genetic complementation with Cosmid Clone TC134. Symptoms of a systemic infection in an untransformed Moneymaker plant are shown in the plant on the left, and resistance response of a Moneymaker plant transformed with cosmid TC 134 can be seen in the plant on the right.

[0017]
FIG. 3 is a Southern blot analysis of cDNA clone TCD1. Genomic DNA from tomato cultivars SW99-1 (R) and Piedmont (S) was isolated from leaves. Aliquots of 3 μg were digested with the indicated enzymes, separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, blotted onto Hybond N+ membrane and hybridized with radiolabeled TCD1 insert. The first line (M) represents the molecular length standard λ Hind III.

[0018] FIGS. 4A-C show expression and structure of the Sw-5 gene. FIG. 4A is blot analysis of Sw-5 RNA. Polyadenylated RNA from leaves of the cultivars SW-99-1 (R, 10 μg) and Piedmont (S, 10 μg) were fractionated on a 1.3% agarose gel containing formaldehyde, blotted onto Hybond N+ membrane, hybridized with radiolabeled TCD 1 insert and exposed to Kodak X-AR film for 7 days. FIG. 4B shows the Sw-5 homologous genomic region of cosmid TC134 and transcript represented as solid black boxes. The angled lines indicate the intron. FIG. 4C shows the deduced Sw-5 protein sequence (SEQ. ID. No. 2). Boundaries of the NBS conserved region are indicated. The polypeptide regions corresponding to kinase-1a, kinase-2, and kinase-3 motifs and two other conserved domains discussed in the text are underlined. The leucine-rich repeat (“LRR”) region is represented in italics.

[0019] FIGS. 5A-C show a detailed analysis of the Sw-5 deduced protein structure. FIG. 5A is a amphiphilicity profile of the Sw-5 protein. FIG. 5B shows a comparison of the conserved centrally located Sw-5 NBS domain (SEQ. ID. No. 3) with: Mil.2 (SEQ. ID. No. 4), Prf (SEQ. ID. No. 5), Rx (SEQ. ID. No. 6), I2C-1 (SEQ. ID. No. 7), and I2C-2 (SEQ. ID. No. 8) and RPM1 (SEQ. ID. No. 9). The conserved kinase-1a, kinase-2, kinase-3a and the conserved hydrophobic domain are indicated. FIG. 5C shows comparisons of the LRR domains of Sw-5 (SEQ. ID. No. 10), Mi-1.2 (SEQ. ID. No. 11), and Prf (SEQ. ID. No. 12). Black boxes in a column indicate identical or similar amino acids.

[0020]
FIG. 6 shows linkage maps of chromosome 9 and 12 showing the distribution of Sw-5 homologues in the tomato genome.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0021] The present invention relates to an isolated plant nucleic acid molecule which imparts resistance in plants to Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus. One suitable form of the nucleic acid of the present invention is the SW-5 gene isolated from tomato which has a nucleic acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 1 as follows:

1atggctgaaa atgaaattga ggaaatgtta gagcacctga gaaggatcaa gagtggaggt60gatctggatt ggctcgacat attgcgaatt gaagaacttg aaatggtgct aagagttttt120agaaccttta caaagtatca tgatgttctt ttgcctgatt ccttagtcga actcacaaag180agggccaaat tgactgggga aatacttcac cgggtgttgg gtaggattcc acataaatgt240aaaactaacc ttaatctgga aaggctagaa tcacatttgt tggaattctt tcaaggtaat300acggcaagtt taagtcacaa ttatgagttg aatgattttg atctgtcgaa atatatggat360tgtctggaaa attttctaaa tgatgtactg atgatgttct tgcaaaagga taggttcttc420cattccagag aacaacttgc aaaacatcga tcaataaagg aactgaaaat tgttcaaaag480aaaataagat ttttgaaata catatatgcc acagagataa atggttatgt cgactatgag540aagcaggaat gtttggagaa tcgaattcag ttcatgacta acactgtggg acaatattgt600ttggcagtat tagattatgt cactgagggt aaacttaatg aagaaaatga caactttagt660aaacctcctt acctattatc attgattgtg ttagtggagc tggaaatgaa gaagattttt720catggtgaag taaaggcttc aaagtttact caatcaaaaa ctttcaagga caagaaatta780ccaaaaggat tttcacatca tctccacaat ctgttgatgt atctcagaaa caaaaagctc840gagaattttc ctaataatat cgctgctcaa aatattgatg tggcaataga gttcttgttg900gttttccttg atgctgatgt gtcaaatcat gttattaatg gtaactggtt gaaaaaggtc960ttgttaaagg ttggagctat agcgggtgat attctatatg taattcaaaa gcttcttcct1020agatcaataa acaaagatga aactagcaac ataagtcttt gctcaataca gatattggag1080aagactaaag atctgaaggc acaagttgag acgtactaca aatccttaaa atttactcca1140tctcagttcc ccacctttgg tggattgagc tttctgaatt ctcttttaag gaaactgaat1200gagatgtcga catctaagtc cggattaggt ttcctgatga aacctctttt agggaatttg1260gagaaagagc tatcatctct tacatccatt ttagagaagg agctctcatc cattttccgt1320gatgtcgtgc accatgaaca taacattcct aaagatcttc agaggcgtac catcaatttg1380tcatatgagg ctgaggttgc tattgattct attcttgctc agtataatgc ttttttgcat1440attttttgct cacttcctac aattgtaaaa gagatcaagc aaattaatgc agaggtgact1500gagatgtggt cagcggacat tcctcttaat cctcactatg tggctgctcc attaaaacat1560ctgccggatc gacatagcaa tcttgtaact gatgaggagg tagtgggttt tgagaataaa1620gcagaagaac taattgatta tctgattaga ggtacaaatg agctagacgt tgtcccaatt1680gtaggcatgg gaggacaagg gaaaacgaca attgctagaa agttgtacaa taatgacatt1740attgtttctc gctttgatgt tcgagcatgg tgcatcattt ctcaaacgta taatcggaga1800gagttattac aagatatttt cagtcaagtt acaggttccg acgacaatgg agctacggtt1860gatgttcttg ccgacatgtt gaggagaaaa ttaatgggaa agagatatct cattgtattg1920gatgatatgt gggattgtat ggtatgggat gacttaaggc tttcttttcc agatgatgga1980attagaagca gaatagtcgt aacaactcga cttgaagaag tgggtaagca agtcaagtac2040catactgatc cttattctct tccattcctc acaacagaag agagttgcca attgttgcag2100aaaaaagtgt ttcaaaagga agattgcccg cctgaactac aagatgtgag tcaagcagta2160gcagaaaaat gcaaaggact gcccctagtg gttgtcttgg tagctggaat aatcaaaaaa2220aggaaaatgg aagaatcttg gtggaatgag gtgaaagatg ctttatttga ctatcttgac2280agtgagttcg aagaatacag tctggcaact atgcagttga gttttgataa cttaccccac2340tgtttaaagc cttgtcttct ttatatggga atgttttcgg aggacgcaag aattccagca2400tctacattga taagtttatg gattgctgaa ggattcgtgg agaacactga atctgggaga2460ttaatggaag aggaagctga aggttacttg atggatctca ttagcagtaa cttggtaatg2520ctttcaaaga gaacttataa gggtagagtc aaatactgtc aggttcatga tgttgtgcat2580cacttttgct tggaaaagag tagagaagca aagtttatgc ttgcagtgaa gggtcaatat2640atccattttc aaccttcgga ttggaaggga actcgagtga gcttcagttt tagtgaagag2700ctttccaagt ttgcatctct ggtctccaaa acacagaagc ctttccatca acacttgagg2760tcattgataa cgaccaatcg agcaaaatct attaatgata ttttctcctg tcagattagt2820gaattgcgac ttcttaaagt cttggatttg agttcttata ttgtggagtt tttgtcgtta2880gctacattca aaccactaaa tcagctgaag tacctcgcag ttcaggcttt tgaattctat2940tttgatccag gatcacatct tccccatata gaaactttca ttgtaatgaa tcttccttat3000tatgatatat tgttaccagt gtctttttgg gaaatgaaaa aattaaggca tgctcatttt3000ggtaaggctg aatttgacaa gcaggggctc tctgaaggat cctctaaatt ggaaaatttg3120aggatattaa agaatattgt tggatttgat agggtggatg tgttatcaag gaggtgtcct3180aatcttcaac aacttcaaat cacatatttt gggaataatg aagagccttt ttgtcccaaa3240ttggagaatc ttacccagct tcaacaactt caactttcct ttgcgcgtcc ccgcactcta3300tccgggttac agttgccttc aaatttaaat aagttggtac ttgaaggaat tcatatagaa3360agtgttattc ccttcattgc gggactacca agcctggaat atctccaatt acaggatgtg3420tgttttcctc aatcagaaga gtggtgcctt ggagatatca cgttccataa acttaagttg3480ttgaaactgg taaagttaaa tatatcaagg tgggatgtct cagaggaatc atttccgttg3540cttgaaacac tcgttataaa gaagtgcatt gacctagagg agatcccact tagctttgct3600gatattccaa cattggaaca gattaaattg attgggtcct ggaaagtatc tctggaggat3660tcagctgtga gaatgaagga agaaatcaaa gacactgaag gatgtgatcg tttacacctc3720gtcaaacaac gctcagattg a3741

[0022] The present invention also relates to a protein encoded by the plant nucleic acid molecule, which, in accordance with the present invention, imparts resistance in plants to Tospoviruses. An example of such a protein is the SW-5 protein, encoded by the nucleotide corresponding to SEQ. ID. NO. 1. This protein has an amino acid sequence corresponding to SEQ. ID. No. 2, as follows:

2Met Ala Glu Asn Glu Ile Glu Glu Met Leu Glu His Leu Arg Arg Ile 1 5 10 15Lys Ser Gly Gly Asp Leu Asp Trp Leu Asp Ile Leu Arg Ile Glu Glc 20 25 30Leu Glu Met Val Leu Arg Val Phe Arg Thr Phe Thr Lys Tyr His Asp 35 40 45Val Leu Leu Pro Asp Ser Leu Val Gln Leu Thr Lys Arg Ala Lys Leu 50 55 60Thr Gly Glu Ile Leu His Arg Val Leu Gly Arg Ile Pro His Lys Cys 65 70 75 80Lys Thr Asn Leu Asn Leu Gln Arg Leu Glu Ser His Leu Leu Glu Phe 85 90 95Phe Gln Gly Asn Thr Ala Ser Leu Ser His Asn Tyr Glu Leu Asn Asp 100 105 110Phe Asp Leu Ser Lys Tyr Met Asp Cys Leu Gln Asn Phe Leu Asn Asp 115 120 125Val Leu Met Met Phe Leu Gln Lys Asp Arg Phe Phe His Ser Arg Gln 130 135 140Gln Leu Ala Lys His Arg Ser Ile Lys Gln Leu Lys Ile Val Gln Lys145 150 155 160Lys Ile Arg Phe Leu Lys Tyr Ile Tyr Ala Thr Gln Ile Asn Gly Tyr 165 170 175Val Asp Tyr Glu Lys Gln Glu Cys Leu Glu Asn Arg Ile Gln Phe Met 180 185 190Thr Asn Thr Val Gly Gln Tyr Cys Leu Ala Val Leu Asp Tyr Val Thr 195 200 205Gln Gly Lys Leu Asn Glu Glu Asn Asp Asn Phe Ser Lys Pro Pro Tyr 210 215 220Leu Leu Ser Leu Ile Val Leu Val Gln Leu Glu Met Lys Lys Ile Phe225 230 235 240His Gly Gln Val Lys Ala Ser Lys Phe Thr Gln Ser Lys Thr Phe Lys 245 250 255Asp Lys Lys Leu Pro Lys Gly Phe Ser His His Leu His Asn Leu Leu 260 265 270Met Tyr Leu Arg Asn Lys Lys Leu Gln Asn Phe Pro Asn Asn Ile Ala 275 280 285Ala Gln Asn Ile Asp Val Ala Ile Gln Phe Leu Leu Val Phe Leu Asp 290 295 300Ala Asp Val Ser Asn His Val Ile Asn Gly Asn Trp Leu Lys Lys Val305 310 315 320Leu Leu Lys Val Gly Ala Ile Ala Gly Asp Ile Leu Tyr Val Ile Gln 325 330 335Lys Leu Leu Pro Arg Ser Ile Asn Lys Asp Gln Thr Ser Asn Ile Ser 340 345 350Leu Cys Ser Ile Gln Ile Leu Glu Lys Thr Lys Asp Leu Lys Ala Gln 355 360 365Val Gln Thr Tyr Tyr Lys Ser Leu Lys Phe Thr Pro Ser Gln Phe Pro 370 375 380Thr Phe Gly Gly Leu Ser Phe Leu Asn Ser Leu Leu Arg Lys Leu Asn385 390 395 400Gln Met Ser Thr Ser Lys Ser Gly Leu Gly Phe Leu Met Lys Pro Leu 405 410 415Leu Gly Asn Leu Gln Lys Gln Leu Ser Ser Leu Thr Ser Ile Leu Gln 420 425 430Lys Glu Leu Ser Ser Ile Phe Arg Asp Val Val His His Glu His Asn 435 440 445Ile Pro Lys Asp Leu Gln Arg Arg Thr Ile Asn Leu Ser Tyr Glu Ala 450 455 460Glu Val Ala Ile Asp Ser Ile Leu Ala Gln Tyr Asn Ala Phe Leu His465 470 475 480Ile Phe Cys Ser Leu Pro Thr Ile Val Lys Glu Ile Lys Gln Ile Asn 485 490 495Ala Glu Val Thr Glu Met Trp Ser Ala Asp Ile Pro Leu Asn Pro His 500 505 510Tyr Val Ala Ala Pro Leu Lys His Leu Pro Asp Arg His Ser Asn Leu 515 520 525Val Thr Asp Glu Glu Val Val Gly Phe Glu Asn Lys Ala Glu Glu Leu 530 535 540Ile Asp Tyr Leu Ile Arg Gly Thr Asn Glu Leu Asp Val Val Pro Ile545 550 555 560Val Gly Met Gly Gly Gln Gly Lys Thr Thr Ile Ala Arg Lys Leu Tyr 565 570 575Asn Asn Asp Ile Ile Val Ser Arg Phe Asp Val Arg Ala Trp Cys Ile580 585 590Ile Ser Gln Thr Tyr Asn Arg Arg Glu Leu Leu Gln Asp Ile Phe Ser 595 600 605Gln Val Thr Gly Ser Asp Asp Asn Gly Ala Thr Val Asp Val Leu Ala 610 615 620Asp Met Leu Arg Arg Lys Leu Met Gly Lys Arg Tyr Leu Ile Val Leu625 630 635 640Asp Asp Met Trp Asp Cys Met Val Trp Asp Asp Leu Arg Leu Ser Phe 645 650 655Pro Asp Asp Gly Ile Arg Ser Arg Ile Val Val Thr Thr Arg Leu Gln 660 665 670Gln Val Gly Lys Gln Val Lys Tyr His Thr Asp Pro Tyr Ser Leu Pro 675 680 685Phe Leu Thr Thr Gln Glu Ser Cys Gln Leu Leu Gln Lys Lys Val Phe 690 695 700Gln Lys Glu Asp Cys Pro Pro Glu Leu Gln Asp Val Ser Gln Ala Val705 710 715 720Ala Glu Lys Cys Lys Gly Leu Pro Leu Val Val Val Leu Val Ala Gly 725 730 735Ile Ile Lys Lys Arg Lys Met Gln Glu Ser Trp Trp Asn Glu Val Lys 740 745 750Asp Ala Leu Phe Asp Tyr Leu Asp Ser Glu Phe Glu Glu Tyr Ser Leu 755 760 765Ala Thr Met Gln Leu Ser Phe Asp Asn Leu Pro His Cys Leu Lys Pro 770 775 780Cys Leu Leu Tyr Met Gly Met Phe Ser Gln Asp Ala Arg Ile Pro Ala785 790 795 800Ser Thr Leu Ile Ser Leu Trp Ile Ala Glu Gly Phe Val Gln Asn Thr 805 810 815Gln Ser Gly Arg Leu Met Glu Glu Glu Ala Gln Gly Tyr Leu Met Asp 820 825 830Leu Ile Ser Ser Asn Leu Val Met Leu Ser Lys Arg Thr Tyr Lys Gly 835 840 845Arg Val Lys Tyr Cys Gln Val His Asp Val Val Val His His Phe Cys 850 855 860Leu Glu Lys Ser Arg Glu Ala Lys Phe Met Leu Ala Val Lys Gly Gln865 870 875 880Tyr Ile His Phe Gln Pro Ser Asp Trp Lys Gly Thr Arg Val Ser Phe 885 890 895Ser Phe Ser Glu Glu Leu Ser Lys Phe Ala Ser Leu Val Ser Lys Thr 900 905 910Gln Lys Pro Phe His Gln His Leu Arg Ser Leu Ile Thr Thr Asn Arg 915 920 925Ala Lys Ser Ile Asn Asp Ile Phe Ser Cys Gln Ile Ser Glu Leu Arg 930 935 940Leu Leu Lys Val Leu Asp Leu Ser Ser Tyr Ile Val Glu Phe Leu Ser945 950 955 960Leu Ala Thr Phe Lys Pro Leu Asn Gln Leu Lys Tyr Leu Ala Val Gln 965 970 975Ala Phe Glu Phe Tyr Phe Asp Pro Gly Ser His Leu Pro His Ile Glu 980 985 990Thr Phe Ile Val Met Asn Leu Pro Tyr Tyr Asp Ile Leu Leu Pro Val 995 1000 1005Ser Phe Trp Glu Met Lys Lys Leu Arg His Ala His Phe Gly Lys Ala 1010 1015 1020Glu Phe Asp Lys Gln Gly Leu Ser Glu Gly Ser Ser Lys Leu Glu Asn1025 1030 1035 1040Leu Arg Ile Leu Lys Asn Ile Val Gly Phe Asp Arg Val Asp Val Leu 1045 1050 1055Ser Arg Arg Cys Pro Asn Leu Gln Gln Leu Gln Ile Thr Tyr Phe Gly 1060 1065 1070Asn Asn Glu Glu Pro Phe Cys Pro Lys Leu Glu Asn Leu Thr Gln Leu 1075 1080 1085Gln Gln Leu Gln Leu Ser Phe Ala Arg Pro Arg Thr Leu Ser Gly Leu 1090 1095 1100Gln Leu Pro Ser Asn Leu Asn Lys Leu Val Leu Glu Gly Ile His Ile1105 1110 1115 1120Glu Ser Val Ile Pro Phe Ile Ala Gly Leu Pro Ser Leu Glu Tyr Leu 1125 1130 1135Gln Leu Gln Asp Val Cys Phe Pro Gln Ser Glu Glu Trp Cys Leu Gly 1140 1145 1150Asp Ile Thr Phe His Lys Leu Lys Leu Leu Lys Leu Val Lys Leu Asn 1155 1160 1165Ile Ser Arg Trp Asp Val Ser Glu Glu Ser Phe Pro Leu Leu Glu Thr 1170 1175 1180Leu Val Ile Lys Lys Cys Ile Asp Leu Glu Glu Ile Pro Leu Ser Phe1185 1190 1195 1200Ala Asp Ile Pro Thr Leu Glu Gln Ile Lys Leu Ile Gly Ser Trp Lys 1205 1210 1215Val Ser Leu Glu Asp Ser Ala Val Arg Met Lys Glu Glu Ile Lys Asp 1220 1225 1230Thr Glu Gly Cys Asp Arg Leu His Leu Val Lys Gln Arg Ser Asp 1235 1240 1245

[0023] Also suitable for use in the present invention are variants of the nucleic acid molecule shown above. An example of a suitable nucleic acid is a nucleic acid molecule which has a nucleotide sequence which hybridizes to the nucleotide sequence of SEQ. ID. No. 1 under stringent conditions comprising 37° C. in a hybridization buffer of 0.9M sodium citrate.

[0024] Fragments of the above protein are also encompassed by the present invention. Suitable fragments can be produced by several means. In the first, subclones of the gene encoding the protein of the present invention are produced by conventional molecular genetic manipulation by subcloning gene fragments. The subclones then are expressed in vitro or in vivo in bacterial cells to yield a smaller protein or peptide.

[0025] In another approach, based on knowledge of the primary structure of the protein of the present invention, fragments of the gene of the present invention may be synthesized by using the PCR technique together with specific sets of primers chosen to represent particular portions of the protein. These then would be cloned into an appropriate vector for increased expression of an accessory peptide or protein.

[0026] Chemical synthesis can also be used to make suitable fragments. Such a synthesis is carried out using known amino acid sequences for the protein of the present invention. These fragments can then be separated by conventional procedures (e.g., chromatography, SDS-PAGE) and used in the methods of the present invention.

[0027] Variants may also (or alternatively) be prepared by, for example, the deletion or addition of amino acids that have minimal influence on the properties, secondary structure, and hydropathic nature of the polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide may be conjugated to a signal (or leader) sequence at the N-terminal end of the protein which co-translationally or post-translationally directs transfer of the protein. The polypeptide may also be conjugated to a linker or other sequence for ease of synthesis, purification, or identification of the polypeptide.

[0028] Another aspect of the present invention is an expression vector containing a DNA molecule encoding an SW-5 protein. The nucleic acid molecule of the present invention may be inserted into any of the many available expression vectors and cell systems using reagents that are well known in the art. In preparing a DNA vector for expression, the various DNA sequences may normally be inserted or substituted into a bacterial plasmid. Any convenient plasmid may be employed, which will be characterized by having a bacterial replication system, a marker which allows for selection in a bacterium, and generally one or more unique, conveniently located restriction sites. Numerous plasmids, referred to as transformation vectors, are available for plant transformation. The selection of a vector will depend on the preferred transformation technique and target species for transformation. A variety of vectors are available for stable transformation using Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a soilbome bacterium that causes crown gall. Crown gall are characterized by tumors or galls that develop on the lower stem and main roots of the infected plant. These tumors are due to the transfer and incorporation of part of the bacterium plasmid DNA into the plant chromosomal DNA. This transfer DNA (T-DNA) is expressed along with the normal genes of the plant cell. The plasmid DNA, pTI, or Ti-DNA, for “tumor inducing plasmid,” contains the vir genes necessary for movement of the T-DNA into the plant. The T-DNA carries genes that encode proteins involved in the biosynthesis of plant regulatory factors, and bacterial nutrients (opines). The T-DNA is delimited by two 25 bp imperfect direct repeat sequences called the “border sequences.” By removing the oncogene and opine genes, and replacing them with a gene of interest, it is possible to transfer foreign DNA into the plant without the formation of tumors or the multiplication of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Fraley, et al., “Expression of Bacterial Genes in Plant Cells,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci., 80:4803-4807 (1983), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

[0029] Further improvement of this technique led to the development of the binary vector system. Bevan, M., “Binary Agrobacterium Vectors for Plant Transformation,” Nucleic Acids Res. 12:8711-8721 (1984), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In this system, all the T-DNA sequences (including the borders) are removed from the pTi, and a second vector containing T-DNA is introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens. This second vector has the advantage of being replicable in E. coli as well as A. tumefaciens, and contains a multiclonal site that facilitates the cloning of a transgene. An example of a commonly used vector is pBin19. Frisch, et al., “Complete Sequence of the Binary Vector Bin19,” Plant Molec. Biol. 27:405-409 (1995), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Any appropriate vectors now known or later described for genetic transformation are suitable for use with the present invention.

[0030] U.S. Pat. No. 4,237,224 issued to Cohen and Boyer, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes the production of expression systems in the form of recombinant plasmids using restriction enzyme cleavage and ligation with DNA ligase. These recombinant plasmids are then introduced by means of transformation and replicated in unicellular cultures including procaryotic organisms and eukaryotic cells grown in tissue culture.

[0031] In one aspect of the present invention, the nucleic acid molecule of the present invention is incorporated into an appropriate vector in the sense direction, such that the open reading frame is properly oriented for the expression of the encoded protein under control of a promoter of choice.

[0032] Certain “control elements” or “regulatory sequences” are also incorporated into the vector-construct. Those non-translated regions of the vector, promoters, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions-which interact with host cellular proteins to carry out transcription and translation. Such elements may vary in their strength and specificity. Depending on the vector system and host utilized, any number of suitable transcription and translation elements, including constitutive and inducible promoters, may be used.

[0033] A constitutive promoter is a promoter that directs expression of a gene throughout the development and life of an organism. Examples of some constitutive promoters that are widely used for inducing expression of transgenes include the nopaline synthase (NOS) gene promoter, from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, (U.S. Pat. 5,034,322 to Rogers et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S and 19S promoters (U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,605 to Fraley et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), those derived from any of the several actin genes, which are known to be expressed in most cells types (U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,068 to Privalle et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), and the ubiquitin promoter, which is a gene product known to accumulate in many cell types.

[0034] An inducible promoter is a promoter that is capable of directly or indirectly activating transcription of one or more DNA sequences or genes in response to an inducer. In the absence of an inducer, the DNA sequences or genes will not be transcribed. The inducer can be a chemical agent, such as a metabolite, growth regulator, herbicide or phenolic compound, or a physiological stress directly imposed upon the plant such as cold, heat, salt, toxins, or through the action of a pathogen or disease agent such as a virus or fungus. A plant cell containing an inducible promoter may be exposed to an inducer by externally applying the inducer to the cell or plant such as by spraying, watering, heating, or by exposure to the operative pathogen. An example of an appropriate inducible promoter for use in the present invention is a glucocorticoid-inducible promoter (Schena et al., “A Steroid-Inducible Gene Expression System for Plant Cells,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:10421-5 (1991), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). Expression of the Sw-5 protein is induced in the plants transformed with the Sw-5 gene when the transgenic plants are brought into contact with nanomolar concentrations of a glucocorticoid, or by contact with dexamethasone, a glucocorticoid analog. Schena et al., “A Steroid-Inducible Gene Expression System for Plant Cells,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10421-5 (1991); Aoyama et al., “A Glucocorticoid-Mediated Transcriptional Induction System in Transgenic Plants,” Plant J. 11: 605-612 (1997), and McNellis et al., “Glucocorticoid-Inducible Expression of a Bacterial Avirulence Gene in Transgenic Arabidopsis Induces Hypersensitive Cell Death, Plant J. 14(2):247-57 (1998), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. In addition, inducible promoters include promoters that function in a tissue specific manner to regulate the gene of interest within selected tissues of the plant. Examples of such tissue specific promoters include seed, flower, or root specific promoters as are well known in the field (U.S. Pat. No. 5,750,385 to Shewmaker et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety).

[0035] The DNA construct of the present invention also includes an operable 3′ regulatory region, selected from among those which are capable of providing correct transcription termination and polyadenylation of mRNA for expression in the host cell of choice, operably linked to a DNA molecule which encodes for a protein of choice. A number of 3′ regulatory regions are known to be operable in plants. Exemplary 3′ regulatory regions include, without limitation, the nopaline synthase 3′ regulatory region (Fraley, et al., “Expression of Bacterial Genes in Plant Cells,” Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 80:4803-4807 (1983), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) and the cauliflower mosaic virus 3′ regulatory region (Odell, et al., “Identification of DNA Sequences Required for Activity of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S Promoter,” Nature 313(6005):810-812 (1985), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). Virtually any 3′ regulatory region known to be operable in plants would suffice for proper expression of the coding sequence of the DNA construct of the present invention.

[0036] The vector of choice, promoter, and an appropriate 3′ regulatory region can be ligated together to produce the plasmid of the present invention using well known molecular cloning techniques as described in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Press, NY (1989), and Ausubel, F. M. et al. (1989) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

[0037] Once the DNA construct of the present invention has been prepared, it is ready to be incorporated into a host cell. Recombinant molecules can be introduced into cells via transformation, particularly transduction, conjugation, mobilization, or electroporation. The DNA sequences are cloned into the host cell using standard cloning procedures known in the art, as described by Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Springs Laboratory, Cold Springs Harbor, N.Y. (1989), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Suitable host cells include, but are not limited to, bacteria, virus, yeast, mammalian cells, insect, plant, and the like. Preferably the host cells are either a bacterial cell or a plant cell.

[0038] Accordingly, another aspect of the present invention relates to a method of making a recombinant cell. Basically, this method is carried out by transforming a plant cell with the nucleic acid of the present invention under conditions effective to yield transcription of the nucleic acid molecule in the plant cell. Preferably, the nucleic acid molecule of the present invention is stably inserted into the genome of the recombinant plant cell as a result of the transformation.

[0039] One approach to transforming plant cells with the nucleic acid molecule of the present invention is particle bombardment (also known as biolistic transformation) of the host cell. This can be accomplished in one of several ways. The first involves propelling inert or biologically active particles at cells. This technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,945,050, 5,036,006, and 5,100,792, all to Sanford, et al., which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Generally, this procedure involves propelling inert or biologically active particles at the cells under conditions effective to penetrate the outer surface of the cell and to be incorporated within the interior thereof. When inert particles are utilized, the vector can be introduced into the cell by coating the particles with the vector containing the heterologous DNA. Alternatively, the target cell can be surrounded by the vector so that the vector is carried into the cell by the wake of the particle. Biologically active particles (e.g., dried bacterial cells containing the vector and heterologous DNA) can also be propelled into plant cells. Other variations of particle bombardment, now known or hereafter developed, can also be used.

[0040] Transient expression in protoplasts allows quantitative studies of gene expression since the population of cells is very high (on the order of 106). To deliver DNA inside protoplasts, several methodologies have been proposed, but the most common are electroporation (Fromm et al., “Expression of Genes Transferred Into Monocot and Dicot Plants by Electroporation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5824-5828 (1985), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) mediated DNA uptake (Krens et al., “In Vitro Transformation of Plant Protoplasts with Ti-Plasmid DNA,” Nature 296:72-74 (1982), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). During electroporation, the DNA is introduced into the cell by means of a reversible change in the permeability of the cell membrane due to exposure to an electric field. PEG transformation introduces the DNA by changing the elasticity of the membranes. Unlike electroporation, PEG transformation does not require any special equipment and transformation efficiencies can be equally high. Another appropriate method of introducing the gene construct of the present invention into a host cell is fusion of protoplasts with other entities, either minicells, cells, lysosomes, or other fusible lipid-surfaced bodies that contain the chimeric gene (Fraley, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79:1859-63 (1982), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety).

[0041] Stable transformants are preferable for the methods of the present invention. An appropriate method of stably introducing the DNA construct into plant cells is to infect a plant cell with Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes previously transformed with the DNA construct. Under appropriate conditions known in the art, the transformed plant cells are grown to form shoots or roots, and develop further into plants. In one embodiment of the present invention transformants are generated using the method of Frary et al, Plant Cell Reports 16: 235 (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, to transform seedling explants.

[0042] Plant tissues suitable for transformation include, but are not limited to, floral buds, leaf tissue, root tissue, meristems, zygotic and somatic embryos, megaspores, and anthers.

[0043] After transformation, the transformed plant cells can be selected and regenerated. Preferably, transformed cells are first identified using a selection marker simultaneously introduced into the host cells along with the DNA construct of the present invention. The most widely used reporter gene for gene fusion experiments has been uidA, a gene from Escherichia coli that encodes the β-glucuronidase protein, also known as GUS. Jefferson et al., “GUS Fusions: βGlucuronidase as a Sensitive and Versatile Gene Fusion Marker in Higher Plants,” EMBO Journal 6:3901-3907 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. GUS is a 68.2 kd protein that acts as a tetramer in its native form. It does not require cofactors or special ionic conditions, although it can be inhibited by divalent cations like Cu2+ or Zn2+. GUS is active in the presence of thiol reducing agents like β-mercaptoethanol or dithiothreitol (DTT).

[0044] Other suitable selection markers include, without limitation, markers encoding for antibiotic resistance, such as the nptII gene which confers kanamycin resistance (Fraley, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:4803-4807 (1983), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) and the dhfr gene, which confers resistance to methotrexate (Bourouis et al., EMBO J. 2:1099-1104 (1983), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety).

[0045] Once a recombinant plant cell or tissue has been obtained, it is possible to regenerate a full-grown plant therefrom. Means for regeneration vary from species to species of plants, but generally a suspension of transformed protoplasts or a petri plate containing transformed explants is first provided. Callus tissue is formed and shoots may be induced from callus and subsequently rooted. Alternatively, embryo formation can be induced in the callus tissue. These embryos germinate as natural embryos to form plants. The culture media will generally contain various amino acids and hormones, such as auxin and cytokinins. It is also advantageous to add glutamic acid and proline to the medium, especially for such species as corn and alfalfa. Efficient regeneration will depend on the medium, on the genotype, and on the history of the culture. If these three variables are controlled, then regeneration is usually reproducible and repeatable.

[0046] Plant regeneration from cultured protoplasts is described in Evans, et al., Handbook of Plant Cell Cultures Vol. 1: (MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, 1983); and Vasil I. R. (ed.), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Acad. Press, Orlando, Vol. I, 1984, and Vol. III (1986), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

[0047] It is known that practically all plants can be regenerated from cultured cells or tissues, including but not limited to, all major species of rice, wheat, barley, rye, cotton, sunflower, peanut, corn, potato, sweet potato, bean, pea, chicory, lettuce, endive, cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, turnip, radish, spinach, onion, garlic, eggplant, pepper, celery, carrot, squash, pumpkin, zucchini, cucumber, apple, pear, melon, strawberry, grape, raspberry, pineapple, soybean, tobacco, tomato, sorghum, and sugarcane.

[0048] After the nucleic acid molecule of the present invention is stably incorporated in transgenic plants, it can be transferred to other plants by sexual crossing or by preparing cultivars. With respect to sexual crossing, any of a number of standard breeding techniques can be used depending upon the species to be crossed. Cultivars can be propagated in accord with common agricultural procedures known to those in the field. Alternatively, transgenic seeds are recovered from the transgenic plants. The seeds can then be planted in the soil and cultivated using conventional procedures to produce transgenic plants.

[0049] Another aspect of the present invention is a method of conferring resistance to Tospoviruses. This involves transforming plants with the nucleic acid molecule of the present invention under conditions effective to impart to the plant resistance to Tospoviruses. Transfection, transformation, and regeneration of plants containing the nucleic acid of the present invention can be carried out as described above.

[0050] Another aspect of the present invention is a method of eliciting a hypersensitive response in plants. This involves transforming plants with a nucleic acid molecule of the present invention, as described above, and expressing the nucleic acid under conditions effective to elicit a hypersensitive response. The hypersensitive response is a rapid, localized necrosis that is associated with the active defense of plants against many pathogens (Kiraly, Z., “Defenses Triggered by the Invader: Hypersensitivity,” pages 201-224 in: Plant Disease: An Advanced Treatise, Vol. 5, J. G. Horsfall and E. B. Cowling, ed. Academic Press New York (1980); Klement, Z., “Hypersensitivity,” pages 149-177 in: Phytopathogenic Prokaryotes, Vol. 2, M. S. Mount and G. H. Lacy, ed. Academic Press, New York (1982), which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety). The localized cell death contains the infecting pathogen from spreading further.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Complementation Experiments: Location of the Sw-5 Locus Within a 20 kb Cosmid Clone

[0051] Earlier work narrowed down the location of Sw-5 to a 100 kb segment of tomato chromosome 9 spanned by the 10 overlapping plant transformation-competent cosmid clones shown in FIG. 1A (Brommonschenkel et al., “Map-based Cloning of the Tomato Genomic Region that Spans the Sw-5 Tospovirus Resistance Gene in Tomato,” Mol. Gen. Genet 256:121-126 (1997); Tanksley et al, “High Density Molecular Linkage Maps of the Tomato and Potato Genomes,” Genetics 132:1141-1160 (1992), which are hereby incorporated by reference it their entirety). To further refine the position of Sw-5 within this contig, the cosmid clones were transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens and used to transform the TSWV susceptible tomato cultivar ‘Moneymaker.” For each cosmid, 3 to 10 independent transformants were generated. The primary transformants were selfed and 20-30 progeny of each T1 plant were screened separately for resistance to TSWV, GRSV, and TCSV isolates in the greenhouse. All of the progeny plants, except those derived from transgenic plants carrying cosmid TC134 (insert ˜20 kb), were completely susceptible to the tospovirus species and isolates. In contrast, progeny plants derived from Moneymaker: TC 134 transformants showed a hypersensitive-like response to TSWV and no symptoms to GRSV and TCSV on inoculated leaves. These transgenic plants, resembled the control plants carrying Sw-5 in that systemic, invasion did not occur, as seen in FIG. 2. DAS-ELISA tests using uninoculated apical leaf samples from these plants confirmed the absence of the viruses. PCR analysis indicated a perfect correlation between tospovirus resistance and the presence of TC 134 cosmid sequences. Progeny plants that were not carrying TC 134 (due to normal segregation) showed typical tospovirus symptoms such as stunting and general necrosis. Overall, these results indicate that all Sw-5 specificity resides on the cosmid TC134.

Example 2

Molecular Cloning of the Sw-5 Gene

[0052] To identify candidates for the Sw-5 gene from the TC 134 genomic region, a leaf cDNA library constructed from the susceptible cultivar Mogeor was probed with TC134 subclones. Two different cDNAs were obtained, TCD1 (˜2.2 kb) and TCD 11 (˜1.2 kb). Sequence analysis revealed that the predicted TCD 1 protein product has regions of homology with known plant disease resistance proteins; showing the greatest similarity to the tomato gene Prf(Salmeron et al., “Tomato Prf is a Member of the Leucine-Rich Repeat Class of Plant Disease Resistance Genes and Lies Embedded Within the Pto Kinase Gene Cluster,” Cell 86:123-133 (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety. In contrast, TCD11 showed no homology with known plant resistance (R) genes. DNA gel blot analysis, shown in FIG. 3, demonstrated that while TCD11 is single copy, numerous TCD1-related sequences are present in the tomato genome. This result suggested that TCD1 was a member of a multigene family. This finding correlates well with previous studies which indicate that plant R genes often occur in gene families (Hammond-Kosack et al., “Plant Disease Resistance Genes,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:575-607 (1997); Staskawicz et al., “Molecular Genetics of Plant Disease Resistance,” Science 268(5211):661-667 (1995), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety). From these two lines of evidence, TCD1 appeared to be the most likely candidate for Sw-5. To prove that TCD1 was indeed derived from the Sw-5 locus, additional transformation experiments were performed with another cosmid clone, TC53, which does not cross hybridize to TCD1 but does contain the remainder of the genomic DNA in TC134 (FIG. 1B). Three independent transgenic Moneymaker plants were obtained, selfed, and their progenies analyzed for tospovirus, resistance. All plants were found to be completely susceptible, leading to the conclusion that Sw-5 lies in the region corresponding to TCD1.

Example 3

Expression and Structure of the Sw-5 Gene

[0053] Gel blots containing poly(A)+ RNA isolated from the leaves of susceptible and resistant tomato lines were hybridized with TCD1. FIG. 4A shows that a weakly expressed transcript of ˜4.4 kb was detected in both resistant and susceptible plants. Given that the TCD1 cDNA is only 2.2 kb, this result suggests that TCD1 is derived from a truncated Sw-5 transcript. Sequencing of the region of the TC134 cosmid which hybridizes to TCD1 and an additional ˜4.0 kb upstream of the 5′ end of this cDNA, identified only one large, intronless, open reading frame (ORF) of 3738 base pairs (bp), encoding a putative hydrophilic polypeptide of 1246 amino acid residues with a relative molecular mass of 144 kDa (FIG. 4B).

[0054] The complete structure of Sw-5 was determined by characterizing additional cDNAs derived from a size-selected unidirectional cDNA library constructed from leaf tissue of the Sw-5 homozygous line SW99-1. After screening 3×106 primary cDNA clones using TCD1 as a probe, 16 hybridizing cDNA clones were identified. Isoline DNA blotting analysis, restriction mapping, and sequence analysis revealed that six clones corresponded to Sw-5, whereas the other ten corresponded to at least three additional genes with a similar sequence. The longest Sw-5 cDNA clone was 3.9 kb. The longest insert in the other five Sw-5 homologous cDNA clones was only 2.6 kb. However, when organized together, these cDNA clones produce a deduced transcribed sequence of ˜4172 bp, which is close to the size of the Sw-5 mRNA as determined by RNA blot analysis, shown in FIG. 4A. Comparison of the cDNA and genomic sequences revealed the presence of an intron (˜1075 nt) in the 5′ untranslated region of Sw-5, shown in FIG. 4B. Thus, the processed transcript has a 5′ untranslated region of ˜234 nucleotides. The length of the 5′ untranslated region is 160 nucleotides. The nucleotides flanking the putative Sw-5 translation start site (GAAAATGGC) are consistent with the consensus sequence for translation initiation in plants (AACAAUGGC; Lütcke et al., “Selection of AUG Initiation Codons Differs in Plants and Animals,” EMBO J. 6:43-48 (1987), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety, and several in-frame stop codons are located upstream of the start codon. A typical TATA box sequence is present 1523 bases upstream of the start codon. The polyadenylation signal is located 135 nucleotides downstream of the termination codon.

[0055] The deduced amino acid sequence of Sw-5 is shown in FIG. 4C.

[0056] The Sw-5 sequence shows the greatest similarity to the amino acid sequence of the nematode resistance protein Mi and the protein required for Pseudomonas resistance and fenthion sensitivity, Prf. The Sw-5 protein contains many motifs found in previously cloned R genes: a putative nucleotide binding site (“NBS”) composed of kinase-1a (or P loop, amino acids 562 to 571), kinase-2a (amino acids 634 to 644), and putative kinase-3a (amino acids 663 to 670) domains 20 (Grant et al., “Structure of the Arabidopsis RPMI Gene Enabling Dual Specificity Disease Resistance,” Science 269:843-846 (1995); Hammond-Kosack et al., “Plant Disease Resistance Genes,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:575-607 (1997), which are hereby incorporated by reference it their entirety). An additional motif of unknown function is present (amino acids 774 to 785) that 25 is well-conserved in the products of other R genes (Grant et al., “Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 Gene Enabling Dual Specificity Disease Resistance,” Science 269:843-846 (1995); Hammond-Kosack et al., “Plant Disease Resistance Genes,” Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:575-607 (1997), which are hereby incorporated by reference it their entirety). The C-terminal region of Sw-5 is composed of 14 imperfect LRRs, beginning at amino acid 916, as shown in FIG. 4C.

[0057] FIGS. 5A-C show a detailed analysis of the Sw-5 deduced protein structure. FIG. 5A is a amphiphilicity profile of the Sw-5 protein. FIG. 5B shows a comparison of the conserved centrally located Sw-5 NBS domain (SEQ. ID. No. 3) with other known resistance genes: tomato Mi-1.2 (SEQ. ID. No. 4) (Milligan et al., “The Root Knot Nematode Resistance Gene Mi from Tomato Is A Member of the Leucine Zipper, Nucleotide Binding, Leucine-Rich Repeat Family of Plant Resistance Genes, Plant Cell 10: 1307-1319 (1998), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), tomato Prf (SEQ. ID. No. 5) (Salmeron et al., “Tomato Prf is a Member of the Leucine-Rich Repeat Class of Plant Disease Resistance Genes and Lies Embedded Within the Pto Kinase Gene Cluster,” Cell 86:123-133 (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), potato virus X resistance gene Rx (SEQ. ID. No. 6) (van der Voort et al., “Tight Physical Linkage of the Nematode Resistance Gene Gpa2 and the Virus Resistance Gene Rx On A Single Segment Introgressed From the Wild Species Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena CPC 1673 Into Cultivated Potato,” Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 12:197-206 (1999), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), tomato I2C-1 (SEQ. ID. No. 7) and I2C-2 (SEQ. ID. No. 8) (Ori et al., “The I2C Family From the Wilt Disease Resistance Locus I2 Belongs to the Nucleotide-Binding, Leucine-Rich Repeat Family of Plant Resistance Genes,” Plant Cell 9(4):521-32 (1997), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) and Arabidopsis RPM1 (SEQ. ID. No. 9) (Grant et al., “Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 Gene Enabling Dual Specificity Disease Resistance,” Science 269:843-846 (1995) which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). The conserved kinase-1a, kinase-2, kinase-3a and the conserved hydrophobic domain are indicated. FIG. 5C shows comparisons of the LRR domains of Sw-5 (SEQ. ID. No. 10), Mi-1.2 (SEQ. ID. No. 11), and Prf (SEQ. ID. No. 12). Black boxes in a column indicate identical or similar amino acids.

Example 4

Mechanism of TSWV resistance

[0058] The NBS-LRR class of R proteins have one common feature: they mediate the development of cell death at sites of infection. Thus, the similarity of Sw-S to these proteins supports the possibility that the mechanism of TSWV resistance involves the elicitation of a hypersensitive response. For example, the resistance to root knot provided by the Mi gene, which is the R gene with the greatest similarity to Sw-5, is characterized by a localized necrosis near the site where feeding cells would normally be initiated (Dropkin, “Physiology of Nematodes of the Soil,” An. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 139(1):39-52 (1966), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety). The fact that the hypersensitive response is not always observed in a Sw-5 background may be due to differences in the affinity of the tospovirus elicitor to Sw-5 and/or differences in the timing of the interaction.

[0059] The Sw-5 protein is remarkably similar to the Mi protein. With the exception of the four heptad amphiphatic leucine zippers at the N-terminus that are not evident in Sw-5, the similarity is dispersed over the entire molecule. It seems reasonable to hypothesize that the functionally and structurally related Sw-5 and Mi proteins may act through a common signal transduction pathway. As root-knot nematodes (Williamson et al., “Nematode Pathogenesis and Resistance in Plants,” Plant Cell 8(10):1735-1745 (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety) and viruses probably secrete/produce several proteins inside the plant cell as part of their life cycles/pathogenic strategies, the similarity of Sw-5 to Mi is not surprising and probably reflects the remarkable epitope-recognition ability and signal transduction activation of NBS-LRR proteins.

Example 5

Genomic Distribution of the Sw-5 Gene Family

[0060] Cosmid DNA blot analysis did not reveal any additional copies of Sw-5 in the 150 kb cosmid contig around the Sw-5 locus (Brommonschenkel et al., “Map-based Cloning of the Tomato Genomic Region that Spans the Sw-5 Tospovirus Resistance Gene in Tomato,” Mol. Gen. Genet 256:121-126 (1997); Tanksley et al, “High Density Molecular Linkage Maps of the Tomato and Potato Genomes,” Genetics 132:1141-1160 (1992); Tanksley et al., “Seed Banks and Molecular Maps: Unlocking Genetic Potential from the Wild,” Science 277(5329):1063-1066 (1997), which are hereby incorporated by reference it their entirety). Because the cDNA screening and isoline DNA blot analysis suggested that Sw-5 was a member of a multigene family, the chromosomal positions of the homologous sequences were assessed by RFLP mapping in an L. esculentum×L. pennellii F2 mapping population (Tanksley et al, “High Density Molecular Linkage Maps of the Tomato and Potato Genomes,” Genetics 132:1141-1160 (1992), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety). As shown in FIG. 6, most of the Sw-5 homolog sequences are dispersed on tomato chromosome 9. Four Sw-5 homolog sequences map to the telomeric region of chromosome 9: Sw-5.1, Sw-5.2 and Sw-5.3 map 3.6, 5.7, and 6.3 cM below CT220, respectively. This is the site of the Globodera pallida resistance gene Gpa6 in the homologous potato genome (van der Voort, “Mapping Genetic Factors Controlling Potato/Cyst Nematode Interactions, Ph.D. Thesis,” Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands (1998), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety). The fourth homolog, Sw-5. 4, cosegregates with CT71, located 2.7 cM above CT220. Two other two homologs map on chromosome 9 in the vicinity of the TM2a tobacco mosaic virus R gene (Pillen et al, “Construction of a High-Resolution Genetic Map and YAC-Contigs in the Tomato Tm-2a Region,” Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:998-233 (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety): Sw-5.5 cosegregates with CD3, just below the centromeric region and Sw-5.6 maps with TG551 further down the long arm of chromosome 9. The Sw-5.7 homolog maps to chromosome 12, cosegregating with TG360, the same region where the powdery mildew resistance gene Lv has been mapped (Chunwongse et al., “High Resolution Map of the Lv Resistance Locus in Tomato,” Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:220-223 (1997), which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety). Clearly, Sw-5 is a member of a multigene family whose members are dispersed throughout the tomato genome and may be conferring resistance to a variety of pathogens.

Example 6

Tospovirus Resistance Evaluation

[0061] Tospovirus resistance was evaluated by mechanical inoculations. The tospovirus strains used for the inoculation tests were: BR-01, ‘HR’ (TSWV), V1-3 and BR-03 (TCSV), and SA-05 (GRSV). The original inoculum was kept at −80° C. and thawed prior to multiplication in Nicotiana tabacum cv Havana 425. Inoculum was prepared by macerating young, newly infected Havana 425 leaves with a mortar and pestle in 0.1M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 0.01M sodium sulfite. The leaves of tomato plants at the 3- to 5-leaf stage (approximately 30-37 days after germination) were dusted with 600 mesh carborundum powder and the inoculum was applied with cheesecloth. A second inoculation was done 2 to 3 days after the first. Plants were evaluated weekly for symptoms and held in the greenhouse for at least 6 weeks after infection. Inoculations consistently resulted in 100% infection of the susceptible tomato control cv. ‘Piedmont’.

[0062] All inoculated plants were assayed for the presence of the virus using the double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) (Cho et al., 1988, which is hereby incorporated by reference it its entirety) and species-specific polyclonal antisera. Symptomatic tissues from plants were sampled and tested for tospovirus. Plants not exhibiting systemic infection were held in the greenhouse for 6 weeks after which time leaf samples from the middle and top of the plants were removed and tested for tospovirus infection.

Example 7

RFLP Analysis

[0063] The standard F2 mapping population (VF36 Tm2a×Lycopersicon pennellii) was employed in determining the map location of TCD1 homologous sequences essentially as described by Tanksley et al, “High Density Molecular Linkage Maps of the Tomato and Potato Genomes,” Genetics 132:1141-1160 (1992), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Example 8

DNA Sequencing and Computer Analysis

[0064] DNA sequences were determined from double-stranded plasmid DNA by the dideoxy chain termination method using Sequenase 2.0 (USB, Cleveland, Ohio). Sequencing reaction products were run on a automated sequencer (ABI 310 and ABI 377 Sequencer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The DNA sequences were assembled using MacVector (International Biotechnology). Homology searches of GeneBank database were performed using the BLAST 2.0 algorithm (Altschul et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs,” Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402 (1997), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). Alignments with other sequences were performed using the MegAlign program (DNASTAR).

Example 9

Plant Transformation

[0065] Cosmid clones were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 by triparental mating or electroporation. Transformation of excised cotyledons from susceptible tomato cultivar Moneymaker was conducted essentially as described by Frary et al., “An Examination of Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Tomato,” Plant Cell Rep. 16:235-240 (1996), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Transgenic plants were identified by resistance to kanamycin and confirmed by PCR assays using specific primers that distinguished between the transgenic cosmid insert and endogenous sequences. Positive transformants, were transferred to the greenhouse and selfed. The T1 progeny were analyzed for virus resistance by mechanical inoculation.

Example 10

cDNA Library Construction and Screening

[0066] Total RNA was isolated from unchallenged leaves of the Sw99-1 line and poly(A)+ RNA was purified using the Oligotex mRNA maxi-preparation kit (QIAgen, Germany). Double stranded cDNA was synthesized using oligo(dT) as primer. After addition of EcoRI linkers, the cDNA molecules were size fractionated. Pools that contained molecules longer than 2.0 kb were combined and ligated to λZapII vector linearized with EcoRI and XhoI, encapsidated in vitro and amplified in E. coli strain XL1-Blue according to the supplier's instructions (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.).

[0067] Approximately 3×106 primary recombinants were screened using the cDNA clone TCD1 as a probe. Hybridizations were performed at 65° C. according to the method of Church and Gilbert, “Genomic Sequencing,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 81(7): 1991-1995 (1984), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). Filters were washed three times at 65° C., once with 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, once with 1× SSC, 0.1% SDS and once with 0.5% SSC, 0.1% SDS, for 20 min. each. After plaque purification, selected positive phage clones were converted to pBluescript SK-phagemid clones using helper phage and following the supplier's instructions (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.).

Example 11

RNA Gel Blot Analysis

[0068] RNA was fractionated on a 1% agarose-0.66 M formaldehyde gel. RNA species were transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond-N+, Amersham, UK) by capillary action using 10× SSC. After NaOH fixation, filters were hybridized at 65° C. according to the method of Church et al., “Genomic Sequencing,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81(7):1991-1995 (1984), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). Filters were washed three times at 65° C., once with 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, once with 1× SSC, 0.1% SDS and once with 0.5% SSC, 0.1% SDS, for 20 min. each. A 0.24 to 9.5-kb RNA ladder (Gibco-BRL, Bethesda, Md.) was used as the size reference.

[0069] Although preferred embodiments have been depicted and described in detail herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that various modifications, additions, substitutions, and the like can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention and these are therefore considered to be within the scope of the invention as defined in the claims which follow.

Plant gene conferring resistance to Tospoviruses

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

CPC

US Classifications

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

Government Interests

Provisional Applications (1)