The invention relates to a plasma cutting arrangement which can in particular be used for simultaneous plasma cutting using plasma cutting torches and in particular for the simultaneous forming of chamfers at cutting edges or a simultaneous heat treatment. It equally relates to the use of wear parts in the plasma cutting torch arrangement.
Plasma cutting is used for cutting metals. Plasma cutting torches are used for this. In machine cutting, they can be guided by a guide system such as a CNC controlled xy coordinate cutting machine or an industrial robot.
Plasma cutting torches as a rule comprise a torch shaft and a torch head. The connections for the media which are required for operating a plasma cutting torch, e.g. for the gas (plasma gas), the power (cutting power), the cooling (cooling medium, cooling water), the ignition voltage and/or pilot current, are located in the torch shaft. The connections can also be combined, e.g. power and cooling medium in one connection. These connections are connected to hoses which can be combined to form a so-called hose package. Solenoid valves for switching the gases can also be accommodated in the torch shaft. These connections, hoses and components require a volume which determines the size of the plasma torch shaft. Such shafts are typically configured in cylindrical shape with a specific outer diameter, whereby the construction size is determined. Starting from the end or tip of the plasma cutting torch, a circular outer shape is selected in this respect such as can be seen from
The described construction shape has disadvantages, in particular when a plurality of plasma cutting torches are to be operated as close as possible next to one another and/or are to be used inclined with respect to one another or to the workpiece surface.
There is also equally a disadvantage when particularly deep cuts, which are deeper than the maximum material thickness which can be cut as a maximum with the plasma cutting torch, are to be introduced into a material.
One application is the cutting of chamfers at metal plates which are required when the metal plates are to be welded after the cutting to shape. There are different chamfer shapes or weld seam preparations (DIN EN ISO 9692-1) for this in dependence on the metal plate thickness and on the welding method. For specific applications (DY seam, Y seam), a plurality of chamfers are required at a metal plate edge. A plurality of plasma cutting torches which are differently inclined with respect to the upper edge of the metal plate can cut and can form chamfers simultaneously here. This is called multi-chamfer cutting. It is also possible to cut individual chamfers after one and other using one and the same plasma cutting torch. The longer cutting time is disadvantageous here since the individual cuts are carried out after one another and the risk is very large that distortion or displacements in the metal plate occur between the cuts and the desired geometry of the component to be cut is no longer reached.
The multi-chamfer cutting is not possible or only incompletely possible with conventional plasma cutting torches. In particular when a plurality of plasma cutting torches are to be arranged close next to one another and/or are to be used inclined with respect to one another or to the workpiece surface.
The smallest spacing between the plasma jets exiting the nozzle which can be realized is then equal to the outer diameter of the plasma torch shaft plus a safety spacing between the plasma torch shafts, which can amount, for example, to 1 to 5 mm, when the plasma cutting torches are to be operated in parallel next to one another.
Plasma cutting torches are known which can be used for cutting chamfers. In this respect, the outer diameter of the torch head tapers in its width over a certain length in the region of the nozzle from which the plasma exits. A pointed construction shape is thus achieved and the formation of chamfer cuts thus becomes possible with limitations. There is, however, the disadvantage due to the cylindrical round shape of the plasma torch shaft having a corresponding outer diameter that a plurality of plasma cutting torches cannot be pivoted past one another with a small spacing. Chamfer angles which are in particular variable can thus not be formed simultaneously using a plurality of plasma torches during one cut. The tips or nozzle bores of the plasma cutting torches directed toward the workpiece to be cut should in this respect, however, be positioned as closely as possible to one another, which is, however, limited by the diameter of the plasma torch shaft on pivot movements of the plasma cutting torches. These disadvantages also occur on the use of a plurality of plasma cutting torches when they are to be used simultaneously and close to one another for different thermal machining processes which are, for example, to be carried out after one another along a kerf to be formed.
It is therefore the object of the invention to improve the conditions and the production precision on the use of a plurality of plasma cutting torches which are to be operated simultaneously and close to one another.
This object is achieved in accordance with the invention by a plasma cutting torch having the features of claim 1. Claim 15 relates to the use of wear parts. Advantageous embodiments and further developments of the invention can be realized using features designated in subordinate claims.
In the plasma cutting torch arrangement in accordance with the invention, at least one plasma cutting torch is present which is formed with a torch body, an electrode and a nozzle having a nozzle bore. In this respect, an outer contour of the plasma cutting torch is present in cross-section with respect to a longitudinal axis which is aligned perpendicular through the nozzle bore and the torch body, in which outer contour a smallest spacing c is observed in at least one axial direction between the longitudinal axis extending through the center of the nozzle bore of the nozzle and the radially outer margin of the outer contour which corresponds to a maximum of ¾ of the length of a largest spacing d between the central longitudinal axis extending through the center of the nozzle bore of the nozzle and radial outer margin of the outer contour AK. A smallest spacing c can, however, also correspond to a maximum of ⅜ of the length of a largest distance b between two points of the outer margin of the outer contour AK whose virtual straight connection line extends through the central longitudinal axis M1, M2, M3 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4.
The outer contour is therefore not rotationally symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal axis extending through the center of the nozzle bore.
In an advantageous embodiment, a smallest spacing c should be observed along a common axis guided in two opposite directions starting from the longitudinal axis extending through the center of the nozzle bore of the nozzle up to the radially outer margin of the outer contour. It is thereby possible to arrange a respective plasma cutting torch at two oppositely disposed sides of a plasma cutting torch formed in this manner very close thereto in simultaneous operation, at the sides at which a smallest spacing is observed.
There is the possibility that at least one smallest spacing c is observed over the total length of a plasma cutting torch or is not exceeded in this respect. In this form, plasma cutting torches can be operated arranged very close next to one another in a parallel arrangement.
A smallest spacing c should, however, be observed or not exceeded at least over the total length of the nozzle, of the nozzle cap, of a nozzle protective cap and, optionally, of a nozzle protective cap holder.
A smallest spacing c can also be observed over a length I which corresponds to at least 1.4 times the maximum width b (largest spacing between two points of the outer margin of the outer contour AK whose virtual straight connection line extends through or intersects the central longitudinal axis M1, M2, M3 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4) of a plasma cutting torch in the region in which a smallest spacing c is observed. A length I can thus have been observed, for example, with a maximum width b of 50 mm (d=25 mm) or a length I of 98 mm with a maximum width b of 70 mm (b=35 mm).
There is the possibility in an embodiment that the center of the nozzle bore is arranged eccentrically within the outer contour. In this case, all the elements or a very large number of elements of the plasma cutting torch, for example the shaft, the nozzle, the nozzle holder, etc., otherwise have a rotationally symmetrical cross-section and a smallest spacing c is nevertheless observed at one side.
It is advantageous if a smallest spacing c is observed of a maximum of ⅓, preferably of a maximum of ¼, and particularly preferably of a maximum of ⅙ of the largest spacing b.
It is advantageous if a smallest spacing c is observed of a maximum of ⅔, preferably of a maximum of ½, and particularly preferably of a maximum of ⅓ of the largest spacing d.
A smallest spacing c can be observed in at least one angular range α of a maximum of 120°, preferably of a maximum of 70°, starting about the longitudinal axis. The peripheral surface at which a smallest spacing c is observed is thereby larger, and plasma torch cutters arranged next to one another and in parallel with one another can thus be arranged and operated closely next to one another.
There is the possibility that the outer contour has at least one largest spacing b directed radially to the nozzle bore, between two points of the outer contour, and its virtual straight connection line intersects the virtual longitudinal axis extending through the center of the nozzle bore of the nozzle, in the angular range rotated between a minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120° axially to the nozzle bore to the right or to the left with respect to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c or with respect to the virtual connection line which is arranged at half the angular range α of the smallest spacing c or has at least one largest spacing d directed radially to the nozzle bore between the central longitudinal axis extending through the center of the nozzle bore of the nozzle and the radially outer margin of the outer contour AK.
A smallest spacing c of a maximum of 20 mm, preferably a maximum of 15 mm, and particularly preferably of a maximum of 12.5 mm, can be observed.
The outer contour can have a circular, polygonal, curved, semi-circular, oval or elliptical shape or a combination thereof. Corners of polygonal outer contours can be rounded.
At least one smallest spacing c of an outer contour in the direction of at least one further plasma torch operated next to the plasma torch should be observed at a plasma torch.
With a plurality of plasma cutting torches operated next to one another and simultaneously, a maximum spacing z1, z2 of 42 mm, advantageously of 32 mm, and particularly advantageously of 27 mm should be observed between virtually extended longitudinal axes of the respective nozzle bores of the nozzles of plasma cutting torches arranged next to one another. A plasma cutting torch can also be arranged having its longitudinal axis during plasma cutting inclined with respect to a perpendicular to a component surface by an angle in the range between 45° and 135°.
A plurality of plasma cutting torches can therefore be operated simultaneously and very closely next to one another using an arrangement in accordance with the invention and there is nevertheless sufficient construction space available for the accommodation of the components required for operation.
In the invention, the ratio of the largest spacing b between two points of the outer margin of the outer contour AK to the smallest spacing b between two points of the outer margin of the outer contour AK, whose respective virtual connection line extends through the central longitudinal axis (M1, M2, M3) extending through the center of the nozzle bore (4.1) of the nozzle (4), should not be larger than 4.
Workpieces having a larger thickness can in particular also be cut using the plasma cutting torch arrangement in accordance with the invention. In this respect, the electrical currents required for this purpose of at least 200 A and also nozzle openings having diameters of at least 2 mm can be used without problems. Oxygen or gas mixtures containing oxygen can be used as the plasma gas. The electrode comprises an emission insert of high-melting metal, e.g. hafnium, tungsten or an alloy thereof, and the electrode holder comprises a material with good heat conductivity, e.g. copper, silver or an alloy thereof.
The wear parts of the plasma torch such as the electrode, the nozzle, the nozzle cap and/or the nozzle protective cap are liquid-cooled.
A plurality of plasma cutting torches of an arrangement in accordance with the invention can be moved by a guide system or by at least one industrial robot for the formation of kerfs.
The invention will be explained in more detail in the following with reference to examples. The features associated with the individual examples are not to be restricted to the respective example. Such features can rather be combined with one another in the most varied form in the invention.
There are shown:
In
In
A smallest space a (here 2*c by way of example), here 28 mm by way of example, directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 between two points of the outer contour AK is equally shown whose virtual straight connection line runs virtually through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and intersects the longitudinal axis M1. This smallest spacing a extends over an angular range α, here 67° by way of example. In a region between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120° rotated offset axially to the nozzle bore 4.1 to the right to the virtual connection line which lies at half (α/2) of the angular range of the smallest spacing a, a largest spacing b directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1, here dimensioned with 70 mm by way of example, is observed between two points of the outer contour AK whose virtual straight connection line intersects the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4.
The region designated by a is shown at the left in
In contrast to the plasma cutting torch in accordance with the prior art (
In
In
A smallest spacing a, here 28 mm by way of example, directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 between two points of the outer contour AK is equally shown whose virtual straight connection line intersects the virtual longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4. In a region between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120° rotated offset axially to the nozzle bore 4.1 to the right to the virtual connection line, a largest spacing b directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1, here at the right and dimensioned with 70 mm by way of example, is shown between two points of the outer contour AK whose virtual straight connection line intersects the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4.
In
A smallest spacing a, here 28 mm by way of example, directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 between two points of the outer contour AK is equally shown whose virtual straight connection line intersects the longitudinal axis M1 virtually extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4. In a region between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120° rotated offset axially to the nozzle bore 4.1 to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing a, a largest spacing b directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1, here at the left and dimensioned with 70 mm by way of example, is shown between two points of the outer contour AK whose virtual straight connection line intersects the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4.
In
The angular range α is only to the left of the nozzle bore 4.1 in
Exactly one respective smallest spacing c is observed to the left and to the right of the nozzle bore 4.1 in
Only a smallest spacing c to the left of the nozzle bore 4.1 is observed in
Equally embodiments are shown in
The plasma gas PG flows through the bores 3.1 of the gas passage 3 into the inner space 4.2 between the electrode 2 and the nozzle 4 and exits the nozzle bore 4.1.
The nozzle 4 is fastened to the nozzle holder 6. The nozzle 4 has a section tapering conically at the angle γ4, here 48° by way of example, toward the nozzle tip in the direction toward the nozzle bore 4.1.
The electrode 2 is directly liquid-cooled; this means it is in direct contact by touching with a cooling liquid, in the simplest case water. The cooling liquid flows through the cooling pipe 10 into the inner space of the electrode 2 (coolant feed WV1) and back again through the intermediate space between the cooling pipe 10 and the electrode 2 (coolant return WR1). The electrode 2 here consists of an emission insert 2.2 and an electrode holder 2.1. The emission insert 2.2 comprises a high-melting material, e.g. hafnium, tungsten or an alloy thereof; and the electrode holder 2.1 is formed from a material with good heat conductivity, e.g. copper, silver or alloys thereof. This ensures an effective cooling of the electrode 2.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c4 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 is observed above and below the nozzle bore 4.1. This means that in this example of an arrangement exactly two smallest spacings c4 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 are observed between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK4.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK of the arrangement is configured such that the smallest spacing c4 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that the arrangement only has one smallest spacing c4 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 in one direction. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK4 has at least one largest spacing d4 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK4 which is directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle bore 4.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c4 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c4 here amounts by way of example to 12 mm and the largest spacing d4 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c4 thus amounts to less than ⅔ of the largest spacing d4.
The nozzle bore here has a minimum diameter d4.1 of 2.4 mm and is suitable for the cutting with currents of at least 200 A or even more than 250 A.
The outer surface of the nozzle 4 has a section tapering conically at the angle γ4, here 80° by way of example, toward the nozzle tip in the direction toward the nozzle bore 4.1.
The outer surface of the nozzle cap 5 has a section tapering conically at the angle γ5, here 48° by way of example, toward the nozzle cap tip in the direction of the nozzle cap bore 5.1.
Since the centers of the nozzle bore 4.1 and of the nozzle cap bore 5.1 coincide in this exemplary arrangement, reference is only made to the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 and the to the longitudinal axis M1.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c5 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 is observed above and below the nozzle bore 4.1. This means that in this example in the arrangement exactly two smallest spacings c5 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 are observed between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK5.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK of the arrangement is configured such that the smallest spacing c5 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that exactly one smallest spacing c5 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 is observed between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 in the arrangement. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK5 has at least one largest spacing d5 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK4 which is directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially in the nozzle bore 4.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c5 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c5 here amounts by way of example to 12 mm and the largest spacing d5 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c5 thus amounts to less than ⅔ of the largest spacing d5.
The nozzle bore here has a minimum diameter d4.1 of 2.4 mm and is suitable for the cutting with currents of at least 200 A or even more than 250 A.
The plasma gas PG flows through the bores 3.1 of the gas passage 3 into the space 4.2 between the electrode 2 and the nozzle 4 and exits the nozzle bore 4.1 and then the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1.
The secondary gas SG flow through the bores 7.1 of the gas passage 7 into the space 8.2 between the nozzle cap 5 and the nozzle protective cap 8 and exits the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1.
The nozzle 4 is fastened to the nozzle holder 6 with the aid of the nozzle cap 5.
The nozzle protective cap 8 is fastened to the nozzle cap 5 by way of example here. It is also possible that the nozzle protective gap 8 is fastened to the torch body 10.1, to the nozzle holder 6 or to another part of the plasma cutting torch 1. As a rule, a fastening takes place which allows an electrical insulation of the nozzle protective cap 8 with respect to the nozzle 4.
The outer surface of the nozzle 4 has a section tapering conically at the angle γ4, here 80° by way of example, toward the nozzle tip in the direction toward the nozzle bore 4.1.
The outer surface of the nozzle cap 5 has a section tapering conically at the angle γ5, here 100° by way of example, toward the nozzle cap tip in the direction of the nozzle cap bore 5.1.
The outer surface of the nozzle protective cap 8 has a section tapering conically at the angle γ8, here 100° by way of example, toward the nozzle protective cap tip in the direction of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1.
Otherwise the embodiment in this example corresponds to the examples shown in
Since the centers of the nozzle bore 4.1 and of the nozzle cap bore 5.1 and of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 coincide in this exemplary arrangement, reference is only made to the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 and to the longitudinal axis M1.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c8 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 is observed above and below the nozzle bore 4.1. This means that in this example in the arrangement exactly two smallest spacings c8 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 are observed between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK8.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour of the arrangement is configured such that the smallest spacing c8 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that only a smallest direction c8 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 is observed in one direction. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK8 has at least one largest spacing d8 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK8 which is directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle bore 4.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c8 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c8 here amounts by way of example to 14 mm and the largest spacing d8 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c8 thus amounts to less than ¾ of the largest spacing d8.
The nozzle bore 4.1 here has a minimum diameter d4.1 of 2.4 mm and is suitable for the cutting with currents of at least 200 A or even more than 250 A.
The difference from
The statements made under
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c4 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 is observed above and below the nozzle bore 4.1. This means that in this example the arrangement has exactly two smallest spacings c4 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK4.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK4 is configured such that the smallest spacing c4 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, preferably of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that the nozzle 4 observes exactly one smallest spacing c4 directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK4 has at least one largest spacing d4 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4 and the outer contour AK4 which is directed radially to the nozzle bore 4.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle bore 4.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c4 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c4 here amounts by way of example to 12 mm and the largest spacing d4 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c4 thus amounts to less than ⅔ of the largest spacing d4.
The outer contour AK4 of the nozzle 4 is not circular/rotationally symmetrical about the longitudinal axis M1.
The nozzle bore here has a minimum diameter d4.1 of 2.4 mm and is suitable for the cutting with currents of at least 200 A or even more than 250 A.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c5 directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 is observed above and below the nozzle cap bore 5.1. This means that in this example exactly two smallest spacings c5 directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 are observed between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle cap bore 5.1 of the nozzle cap 5 and the outer contour AK5.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK5 is configured such that the smallest spacing c5 is observed in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that the nozzle cap 5 has exactly one smallest spacing c5 directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 in one direction. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced analog to
The outer contour AK5 has at least one largest spacing d5 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle cap bore 5.1 of the nozzle cap 5 and the outer contour AK5 which is directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c5 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c5 here amounts by way of example to 12 mm and the largest spacing d5 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c5 thus amounts to less than ⅔ of the largest spacing d5.
The outer contour AK5 of the nozzle cap 5 is not circular/rotationally symmetrical about the longitudinal axis M1.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c5 directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 is observed above and below the nozzle cap bore 5.1. This means that in this example the arrangement has exactly two smallest spacings c5 directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle cap bore 5.1 of the nozzle cap 5 and the outer contour AK5.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK5 is configured such that the smallest spacing c5 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that the nozzle cap 5 has exactly one smallest spacing c5 directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 in one direction. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK5 has at least one largest spacing d1 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle cap bore 5.1 of the nozzle cap 5 and the outer contour AK5 which is directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle cap bore 5.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c5 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c5 here amounts by way of example to 13 mm and the largest spacing d5 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c5 thus amounts to less than ¾ of the largest spacing d5.
The outer contour AK5 of the nozzle cap 5 is not circular/rotationally symmetrical about the longitudinal axis M1.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c8 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 is observed to the left and right of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1. This means that in this example in the arrangement exactly two smallest spacings c8 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 are observed between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 of the nozzle protective cap 8 and the outer contour AK8.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK8 is configured such that the smallest spacing c8 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that the nozzle protective cap 8 has exactly one smallest spacing c8 in a direction directed radially to the nozzle cap bore 8.1. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK8 has at least one largest spacing d8 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 of the nozzle protective cap 8 and the outer contour AK8 which is directed radially to the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c8 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c8 here amounts by way of example to 14 mm and the largest spacing d8 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c8 thus amounts to less than ¾ of the largest spacing d8.
The outer contour AK8 of the nozzle protective cap 8 is not circular/rotationally symmetrical.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c9 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1 is observed above and below the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1. This means that in this example the arrangement has exactly two smallest spacings c9 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1 of the nozzle protective cap holder 9 and the outer contour AK9 in two directions.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK9 is configured such that the smallest spacing c9 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that exactly one smallest spacing c9 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1 is observed in one direction at the nozzle protective cap holder 9. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK9 has at least one largest spacing d9 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1 of the nozzle protective cap holder 9 and the outer contour AK9 which is directed radially to the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle protective cap holder bore 9.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c9 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c9 here amounts by way of example to 14 mm and the largest spacing d9 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c9 thus amounts to less than ¾ of the largest spacing d9.
The outer contour AK9 of the nozzle protective cap holder 9 is not circular/rotationally symmetrical about the longitudinal axis M1.
The nozzle protective cap 8 has a section tapering conically at the angle γ8, here 100° by way of example, toward the nozzle protective cap tip in the direction of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1.
A respective exactly one smallest spacing c9 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 is observed above and below the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1. This means that in this example the arrangement has exactly two smallest spacings c9 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 of the nozzle protective cap 8 and the outer contour AK9.
An angular range α does not exist in this embodiment or it amounts to 0°. It is, however, also possible that the outer contour AK9 is configured such that the smallest spacing c9 extends in an angular range α of a maximum of 120° or, better, of a maximum of 70°. It is equally possible that exactly one smallest spacing c9 directed radially to the nozzle protective cap holder bore 8.1 is observed in one direction in the arrangement with nozzle protective cap holder 8 and nozzle protective cap holder 9. A pictorial illustration was dispensed with here; however, it can be deduced from the examples of
The outer contour AK9 has at least one largest spacing d9 between the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 of the nozzle protective cap 8 and the outer contour AK8 which is directed radially to the nozzle protective cap holder 8.1 in the angular range which is rotated axially to the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 to the right or to the left to the virtual connection line of the smallest spacing c9 between the minimum angle βmin of 60° and the maximum angle βmax of 120°. The angular range rotated to the right by βmin to βmax is shown.
The smallest spacing c9 here amounts by way of example to 14 mm and the largest spacing d9 by way of example to 19 mm. The smallest spacing c9 thus amounts to less than ¾ of the largest spacing d9.
The outer contour AK9 of the arrangement of nozzle protective cap holder 9 and nozzle protective cap 8 is not circular/rotationally symmetrical.
The nozzle protective cap is shown by way of example here in
An arrangement of nozzle protective cap 8 and nozzle protective cap holder 9 is shown in
In this respect, the smallest spacings c as well as the largest spacings d are indicated by way of example. Examples are shown in
The angular range α is only present above the nozzle protective cap bore 8.1 in
Asymmetrical embodiments are equally shown by way of example in
It is in this respect the plasma cutting torches 1 shown in
It is furthermore shown in
This is required for the cutting of chamfers for the weld seam preparation which are required for the different angles of the cutting edges produced during cutting. Examples for this are explained inter alia in DIN EN ISO 9692-2. The cutting of a so-called Y seam is shown in
The cutting of such chamfers is only meaningful from a workpiece thickness of 10 mm onward and can also amount to 50 mm depending on the application. The material thickness which a suitable plasma cutting torch can cut is considerably larger in dependence on the angle 61 and can amount to 1.5 fold, that is 15 mm or also 75 mm. The electric current during plasma cutting with which such material thicknesses can be cut productively amounts to at least 200 A. The nozzle bores 4.1 of the nozzles 4 then have a diameter of at least 1.7 mm, better 2.0 mm up to 2.4 mm. For larger material thicknesses, cutting takes place with higher currents, e.g. 400 A, and also larger diameters of the nozzle bores, e.g. having with diameters larger than 3 mm. The plasma cutting torches and their construction shapes therefore have to be suitable to be able to transmit such electric currents reliably and simultaneously to be able to be arranged as closely as possible next to one another to achieve a contour accuracy which is as high as possible of the desired shape of the workpiece to be cut during cutting. At least one wear part of such plasma cutting torches, in particular the electrode 2, the nozzle 4 and/or the nozzle cap 5, can, as already shown in
Plasma cutting torches in accordance with the prior art have a circular outer contour having a diameter of 50 mm in this current range, as shown in
At least one virtual connection line of at least one smallest spacing c, which is observed between the outer contour AK and the longitudinal axis M1 extending through the center of the nozzle bore 4.1 of the nozzle 4, which is inclined from the axis feed direction v of the plasma cutting torch with respect to the workpiece 20 by an angle E of a maximum of 30°, preferably a maximum of 15°, particularly preferably of a maximum of 5°, and very particularly preferably is aligned parallel therewith. This is shown in
It is in this respect the plasma cutting torches 3 shown in
It is furthermore shown in
This is required for the cutting of chamfers for the weld seam preparation for which the different angles of the cutting edges produced during cutting are required. Examples for this are explained inter alia in DIN EN ISO 9692-2. The cutting of a so-called DY seam is shown in
The kerf F1 having the width f1 is formed by the plasma cutting torch 1.1 arranged almost perpendicular to the workpiece and the oblique kerf F2 having the width f2 is formed by the plasma cutting torch 1.2 inclined by the angle δ1. This result is then, as the right part of the workpiece 20 in
The cutting of these chamfers is only meaningful from a workpiece thickness t of 16 mm onward and can also amount to 50 mm depending on the application. The material thickness which the inclined plasma cutting torch has to be cut is much larger in dependence on the angles 61 and 62 and can amount to 1.5-fold, that is 24 mm to 75 mm. The electric current in plasma cutting at which such material thicknesses can be cut productively amounts to at least 200 A; the nozzle bores 4.1 of the nozzles 4 then have a diameter of at least 1.7 mm, better 2.0 mm up to 2.4 mm. For larger material thicknesses, cutting takes place with higher electrical currents, e.g. 400 A, and also larger diameters of the nozzle bores, e.g. with diameters larger than 3 mm. The plasma cutting torches and their construction shapes therefore should be suitable to be able to transmit such electrical currents reliably and simultaneously to be able to be arranged as closely as possible next to one another to achieve a contour accuracy which is as high as possible of the desired shape of the workpiece to be cut during cutting.
At least one wear part of such plasma cutting torches, in particular the electrode 2, the nozzle 4 and/or the nozzle cap 5, are, as already shown in
Plasma cutting torches in accordance with the prior art have a circular outer contour having a diameter of 50 mm in this electrical current range, as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14167330.1 | May 2014 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2015/059841 | 5/5/2015 | WO | 00 |