1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a plasma display panel, and more particularly, to a plasma display panel having less impedance in the sink discharge current path.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Cathode ray tubes (CRTs) have been widely used as TV displays and excel in resolution and picture quality. However, the depth and weight of a CRT sharply increases as screen size increases. A CRT also has other disadvantages such as high power consumption, image flickering and possible health hazard after long-term use. Therefore, in order to obtain a planar, full-color, high-resolution TV with a large screen size, the plasma display panel (PDP) having a large screen size and a short depth has been developed. The PDP is advantageous in possible reduction in thickness thereof, and also in its large contrast in display without substantial image flickering as well as in possible enlargement of its screen. The PDP is further advantageous in high response speed and realizing a multicolor display by utilizing a fluorescent material illuminated by plasma discharges. In recent years, the PDP has been used widely in various fields of displays for computers and color displays. The PDP can be categorized into two types depending on the driving method. The first type is an alternating current (AC) PDP operated by an AC discharge indirectly between electrodes coated with dielectric films. The second type is a direct current (DC) PDP operated by a DC discharge directly between electrodes exposed to a discharge space. The AC PDP has been regarded as mainstream because of lower power consumption and longer lifetime.
A customary surface-discharge AC type PDP is composed of a display panel and a driving circuit. The PDP includes a plurality of discharge units, each having three electrodes. The driving circuit is for driving the three electrodes of each discharge unit, respectively, in accordance with the driving method and the driving procedures. The three electrodes in each discharge unit include an address electrode and two sustain electrodes: an X-electrode and a Y-electrode, respectively. In a PDP of a three-electrode lateral discharge structure, address electrodes are arranged intersecting the two parallel sustain X-electrode and Y-electrode, in a discharge space formed by barriers. In this structure, discharging for generating wall charges occurs between the address electrodes and the Y electrode in order to select a pixel, and then discharging for displaying an image is repeated for a predetermined period of time between the Y electrode and the X electrode. The barriers not only form the discharge space but also shield light generated when discharge occurs to prevent crosstalk between neighboring pixels. A plurality of unit structures obtained as above is formed on a substrate in a matrix form, and a fluorescent material is coated on each unit structure to construct one pixel. A plurality of pixels formed in this manner form a PDP. A commercially available surface-discharge AC type PDP is constructed in such a manner that discharging occurs in each pixel, and ultraviolet rays generated according to the discharge excite fluorescent material coated on the inner wall of each pixel to produce a desired color.
The circuit characteristic of the PDP is somewhat equivalent to a capacitor-like load. The driving method is to impose a high-voltage and high-frequency alternating voltage on both ends of the capacitor-like load so that the charges in the plasma display unit are driven back and forth. The driving sequence of a conventional surface-discharge AC type PDP has the following periods: (1) reset period, (2) scan period, and (3) sustaining period. In the reset period, the PDP imposes a large potential difference on the X and Y sustaining electrodes of which the primary purpose is to generate the same amount of wall charges in each of the display units so that image data can be correctly recorded in the subsequent scan period. The dischargeable gas in the plasma display unit can be excited and ionized in the sustaining period so as to discharge and result in image display.
During a sustain period of a PDP driving circuit, a sustain pulse of Vsus is alternately applied to the sustain electrodes X and the sustain electrodes Y, resulting in a large voltage difference between electrodes and high discharge currents in the PDP driving circuit. When a sustain pulse of a positive voltage Vsus is applied to the sustain electrodes X and the sustain electrodes Y is set to ground, the resulting discharge current is called a sink discharge current.
Path 1: S8(channel)→Cp→S1 (diode)→S3(channel)→S4→S5(channel)→S7(channel); and
Path 2: S8(channel)→Cp→S2(channel)→S4→S5(channel)→S7(channel).
Since the sink discharge current pass through many MOSFETs, the impedances of the sink diode discharge current paths are also considerable. Since higher path impedances downgrade the performance of the PDP, it is desirable to lower the impedances of the sink diode discharge current paths in the PDP driving circuit.
It is therefore an objective of the claimed invention to provide a plasma display panel having less impedance in the sink discharge current path.
The claimed invention discloses a plasma display panel comprising a panel capacitor having a first end and a second end, a first switch having a first end coupled to the first end of the panel capacitor and a second end coupled to a voltage source, a second switch having a first end connected to the first end of the panel capacitor and a second end coupled to a negative voltage source, a third switch having a first end coupled to the second end of the first switch and a second end, and a fourth switch having a first end coupled to the second end of the second switch and a second end coupled to the second end of the third switch.
The claimed invention also discloses a plasma display panel comprising a panel capacitor having a first end and a second end, a first switch having a first end coupled to a first end of the panel capacitor and a second end coupled to a positive voltage source, a second switch having a first end coupled to the first end of the panel capacitor and a second end, and a third switch having a first end coupled to the second end of the first switch and a second end coupled to the second end of the second switch.
These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment that is illustrated in the various figures and drawings.
Please refer to
Path 3: S18(channel)→Cp→S11(diode)→S13(diode)→S15(channel)→S17(channel)
Path 4: S18(channel)→Cp→S12(channel)→S15(channel)→S17(channel)
Since in the PDP 30, the sink discharge current paths Path 3 and 4 include fewer devices than the sink discharge current paths Path 1 and 2 of the prior art PDP 10, the impedance of the sink discharge current paths can be lowered. Therefore, the PDP 30 has better performance. Also, the PDP 30 utilizes a diode for the switch S13 instead of a MOSFET with a body diode, so it can lower the cost for a heat sink for heat dissipation and a high-voltage integrated circuit (HVIC) for controlling the switch. In the prior art PDP 10, reducing device cost cannot be achieved with the same method. If the switch S3 in the prior art PDP 10 is a diode instead of a MOSFET with a body diode, the switch S3 will be conducting during the scan period when a negative voltage VscL is applied, and the PDP will not be able to function normally during this period. But in the PDP 30 of the present invention, the negative voltage source −VscL is not required. Therefore, the PDP 30 does not require an intermediate switch S4 for preventing the switch S13 from conducting when a negative voltage VscL is applied during the scan period.
Please refer to
Path 5: S18→Cp→S11→S13→S17
Path 6: S18→Cp→S12→S15→S17
Please refer to
Path 7: S18→Cp→S11→S13→S17
Path 8: S18→Cp→S12→S17
Please refer to
Path 9: S18→Cp→S11→S13→S15→S17
Path 10: S18→Cp→S12→S14→S15→S17
Since the sink discharge current paths Path 9 and 10 of the PDP 60 include fewer devices than the sink discharge current paths Path 1 and 2 of the prior art PDP 10, the impedance of the sink discharge current paths can be lowered. Therefore, the PDP 60 has better performance. Also, the PDP 60 utilizes a diode for the switch S13 instead of a MOSFET with a body diode, so it can lower the cost for a heat sink for heat dissipation and a HVIC for controlling the switch. As mentioned before, reducing device cost cannot be achieved with the same method in the prior art PDP 10. However in the PDP 60 of the present invention, the diode used for the switch S13 is coupled to the VscL through the switch S14 which is a MOSFET with a body diode. The switch S14 prevents the switch S13 from conducting when a negative voltage VscL is applied to the PDP 30 during the scan period.
Please refer to
Path 11: S18→Cp→S11→S13→S17
Path 12: S18→Cp→S12→S14→S15→S17
Please refer to
Path 13: S18→Cp→S11→S13→S17
Path 14: S18→Cp→S12→S14→S17
Please refer to
Path 15: S18→Cp→S11→S13→S17
Path 16: S18→Cp→S12→S14→S17
Compared to the sink discharge current paths Path 1 and 2 in the prior art PDP, the sink discharge current paths Path 3-16 include fewer devices and therefore have less impedance. Also, the present invention utilizes a diode for the switch S13 instead of a MOSFET with a body diode. Thus the cost for a heat sink for heat dissipation and HVIC for controlling the switch can be reduced. In conclusion, the present invention not only reduces manufacturing cost of a PDP, it also provides better control and easier design for the devices of the PDP.
Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.