The present invention relates generally to large multiple serving beverage containers, in particular, beer kegs.
Metal beer kegs primarily made of stainless steel have been the preferred method of transporting draft beer from the brewery to the retailer (i.e. restaurant, bar, store) for many years. They come in several sizes, between a sixth barrel and a half barrel.
Metal kegs are very durable and can give many years of service. However, they have a high initial purchase price and several additional costs during use. First, shipping an empty keg back to the brewery increases the actual cost of using stainless steel or metal beer kegs. Next, the keg must be prepared for refilling, including being emptied, inspected, pressure checked, precleaned with water, cleaned with a caustic rinse, steam sterilized and evacuated with CO2 before it can be refilled. Damaged kegs must also be repaired as needed at this time.
The high cost of stainless steel has made it profitable for thieves to steal empty kegs and sell them for scrap. The cost of lost or stolen kegs further increases the cost of using metal beer kegs.
A beer keg includes a container having a base and a wall extending upward from a periphery of the base. A liner within the container includes a base, sidewalls and a mouth. The base of the liner interlocks with the base of the container to prevent relative rotation therebetween. A valve is disposed over the mouth of the liner.
According to a method according to another aspect of the invention, the liner is pressurized with a gas before being filled with the liquid (beer). This internal pressure provides increased strength to the liner. The internal pressure may also assist in retaining the liner within the container, especially when inverted.
The wall 16 includes a pair of handle openings 20 extending through an upper portion of the outer wall 16. An annular rib 26 extends outward from the outer wall 16 above the handle openings 20 to increase the rigidity of the container mouth. An annular skirt 28 extends outward from the outer wall 16 below the handles 20 to increase the rigidity of the outer wall 16 and to provide additional grip points.
It should be noted that the container 12 is generally in the form of a pail, which provides several advantages as will be described below. It should be noted that, in general, the familiar form factor of the pail with removable lid provides many of the advantages of the present invention beer keg 10, including nestability of the containers 12 with one another, ease of carrying, removability and replacability of the lid 14, and reusability of the container 12 and lid 14. This also provides advantages to the extent that there are existing technologies for the manufacture, labeling and handling of pails generally. The container 12 and lid 14 may be HDPE, polypropylene or other suitable materials.
A valve/spear assembly 50 is secured to the mouth 46 of the PET bottle 40. The valve/spear assembly 50 includes a spear 52 extending downwardly to the bottom of the liner 40 from a valve 54 at the liner 40 mouth 46. The valve 54 and spear 52 are not shown in detail.
In
Referring to
In
The liner 40 is then filled by the filling valve 60. The filling valve 60 then lowers again. The liner 40 when full is pressurized and expanded against the outer wall 16 of the outer container 12. The friction between the liner 40 and outer wall 16 holds the liner 40 in the outer container 12 even when the liner 40 is full. Optionally, portions of the outer wall 16 could be made with a smaller inner diameter to increase the friction between the liner 40 and outer wall 16 after the liner 40 is pressurized. The filled keg 10 is then turned back to the upright position for shipping, sale and use.
Prior to filling, and after removal of an empty liner 40 by the user, empty containers 12 can be nested within one another, thus reducing their overall stacking height. Further, the lids 14 are also stackable and partially nestable. The used liners 40 and valve/spear assemblies 50 can be recycled. The empty outer containers 12 can be returned to be used with new liners 40, or recycled. The empty outer containers 12 can also be reused for other purposes.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes and jurisprudence, exemplary configurations described above are considered to represent a preferred embodiment of the invention. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope. Alphanumeric identifiers on method claim steps are for ease of reference in dependent claims and do not signify a required sequence unless otherwise specified.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/170,972, filed Apr. 20, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3140007 | Nettleship | Jul 1964 | A |
3825145 | Reynolds | Jul 1974 | A |
3827595 | Reynolds | Aug 1974 | A |
3908871 | Gottwald | Sep 1975 | A |
3952904 | Verlinden | Apr 1976 | A |
4032047 | Wilson | Jun 1977 | A |
4482067 | Saito et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491247 | Nitchman | Jan 1985 | A |
4519219 | Prepodnik et al. | May 1985 | A |
4531656 | Nitchman | Jul 1985 | A |
4867348 | Dorfman | Sep 1989 | A |
5129534 | Dunn | Jul 1992 | A |
5267669 | Dixon et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5597085 | Rauworth et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5897016 | Wheaton | Apr 1999 | A |
6196277 | Till et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6260823 | Weber | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6308858 | Koefelda | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343916 | Bougamont et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6415959 | Bougamont et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6626314 | McHenry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6666358 | Field | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6748789 | Turner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751981 | Burnette | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6805267 | Bougamont et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7134578 | Bougamont et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7174762 | Turner et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7455082 | Monzel | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7546935 | Wheaton | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7819286 | Antheil et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20040026461 | Bougamont et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20060049213 | Wheaton | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080251542 | Rossignol | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277001 | Wheaton | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090206505 | Monzel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090320264 | Berger et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100077790 | Apps | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110017737 | Apps | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110180535 | Apps | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 095 897 | May 2001 | EP |
1270499 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 947 029 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2281753 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2 665 688 | Feb 1992 | FR |
437 295 | Oct 1935 | GB |
2 182 319 | May 1987 | GB |
2188040 | Sep 1987 | GB |
2209740 | May 1989 | GB |
2283967 | May 1995 | GB |
9112196 | Aug 1991 | WO |
2004063087 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006110948 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2008013819 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008013819 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008083782 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100264140 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61170972 | Apr 2009 | US |