The present invention relates generally to large multiple serving beverage containers, in particular, beer kegs.
Metal beer kegs primarily made of stainless steel have been the preferred method of transporting draft beer from the brewery to the retailer (i.e. restaurant, bar, store) for many years. They come in several sizes, between a sixth barrel and a half barrel.
Metal kegs are very durable and can give many years of service. However, they have a high initial purchase price and several additional costs during use. First, shipping an empty keg back to the brewery increases the actual cost of using stainless steel or metal beer kegs. Next, the keg must be prepared for refilling, including being emptied, inspected, pressure checked, precleaned with water, cleaned with a caustic rinse, steam sterilized and evacuated with CO2 before it can be refilled. Damaged kegs must also be repaired as needed at this time.
The high cost of stainless steel has made it profitable for thieves to steal empty kegs and sell them for scrap. The cost of lost or stolen kegs further increases the cost of using metal beer kegs.
Most bottle or can beer is pasteurized, which is why it can be stored and sold at room temperature. The pasteurization also gives it a longer shelf life. Outside of the U.S., it is more common for keg beer to be pasteurized. In the U.S., most keg beer is not pasteurized. This means it must be kept cold from the time the keg is filled to the time it is emptied. Thus, there is another additional cost to the system to keep the keg beer refrigerated during transport and storage.
Beer spoils quickly once it is exposed to air. A keg that uses air for draft pressure will typically spoil within a few days. Commercial systems and the better home systems use CO2 as the preferred gas to pressurize the kegs and force the beer to flow. CO2 does not react with the beer and allows beer to remain fresh over several weeks.
Although draft beer is often available at restaurants and bars, however, it is difficult to sell draft beer for home consumption at a reasonable price. One obstacle to providing draft beer for the home market is the weight of a full keg of beer. A standard keg weighs approximately 160 pounds full and a pony keg (quarter barrel) weighs about 87 pounds full. Most stores also require an expensive deposit for the keg, which further inhibits the take-home market. The shape and size of kegs makes it difficult for the home user to refrigerate the keg without specialized coolers or refrigerators. Also, a typical home user does not have a CO2 system, which is required if the beer is to be consumed over longer than a weekend.
There are some proposed designs for one-way kegs. One design uses a combination of a PET bottle and a cardboard box with a valve/spear design. Another design uses a similar concept but replaces the valve/spear assembly with a bag. Neither design is all plastic.
One plastic one-way beer keg includes a blow-molded PET container (bottle), which contains the beer. A spear/valve assembly allows the keg to be filled and dispensed. A blow-molded outer container protects the bottle from damage and allows the package to be transported. A lid securely attaches to the valve and outer and inner containers to form a rigid package that protects the beer inside. The design looks like a traditional metal keg and works with existing equipment that interfaces with metal kegs. However, this design is still expensive, and much more expensive than returnable kegs. Further, the inner and outer shells act together as an insulation barrier. For pasteurized beer, which may be warm when purchased, this makes it much more difficult for the consumer to cool the beer. In addition, due to the shape of the liner and outer/inner shell combination, the beer volume is roughly half that of a similarly sized metal keg.
The present invention provides a consumer friendly plastic keg. The keg includes an outer container body having a base. Tapered walls extend upwardly from a periphery of the base to a container mouth. Empty outer containers are nestable with one another to facilitate warehousing and transportation. A liner or bottle is received within the outer container.
A lid may be removably secured to an upper end of the outer container, thereby enclosing the liner. Handles may be provided to facilitate carrying and transport.
According to another feature of the present invention, there may be at least one vertical gap between the liner and the container. Thus, the lid can be removed during use and ice can be placed inside the outer container between the outer container wall and the liner, thus providing more direct cooling of the beer inside the liner. Alternatively, the gap provides increased airflow for cooling. In one embodiment of the present invention, portions of the walls of the outer container are stepped inward to provide the gaps. In another embodiment, portions of the liner are stepped to provide gaps. In another embodiment, the container has a cross section with corners which provide gaps.
After use, the liner can be removed and recycled. The remaining outer container and lid can be used for storage of other items by the consumer. Alternatively, empty outer containers can be nested with one another and returned for reuse, or recycled.
These and other features of the application can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
The wall 16 includes a pair of first recesses 20 extending upward approximately half the height of the container 12. Each of the first recesses 20 has an upper end 22. A pair of second recesses 24 extend from the base 18 up to a skirt 28. A pair of annular ribs 26 extend outward from the wall 16 above the skirt 28 to increase the rigidity of the container mouth. A handle 30 is formed in the skirt 28 above each of the second recesses 24. A handle attachment wall 34 is formed between the skirt 28 and one of the annular ribs 26 for attachment of a pivoting handle 36.
It should be noted that the container 12 is generally in the form of a pail, which provides several advantages as will be described below. The recesses 20, 24 also provide particular advantages in the context of the beer keg 10. It should be noted that, in general, the familiar form factor of the pail with removable lid and pivoting handle provides many of the advantages of the present invention beer keg 10, including nestability of the containers 12 with one another, ease of carrying, removability and replacability of the lid 14, and reusability of the container 12 and lid 14. This also provides advantages to the extent that there are existing technologies for the manufacture, labeling and handling of pails generally. The container 12 and lid 14 may be HDPE, polypropylene or other suitable materials.
A valve/spear assembly 50 is secured to the mouth 46 of the PET bottle 40. The valve/spear assembly 50 includes a spear 52 extending downwardly to the bottom of the liner 40 from a valve 54 at the liner 40 mouth 46.
The liner 40 is shown by itself in
Alternatively, the gaps can be eliminated by eliminating the corrugations 21, and increasing the size of the liner 40 to match the inner diameter of the container 12. This would increase the volume of beer within the liner 40, for applications where rapid cooling is not necessary, such as commercial applications where plastic kegs would be stored in coolers.
As shown in
As shown in
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes and jurisprudence, exemplary configurations described above are considered to represent a preferred embodiment of the invention. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope. Alphanumeric identifiers on method claim steps are for ease of reference in dependent claims and do not signify a required sequence unless otherwise specified.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2090403 | Murray et al. | Aug 1937 | A |
2104466 | Marzolf | Jan 1938 | A |
2447390 | Brand | Aug 1948 | A |
3768706 | Hill | Oct 1973 | A |
3825145 | Reynolds | Jul 1974 | A |
3827595 | Reynolds | Aug 1974 | A |
3908871 | Gottwald | Sep 1975 | A |
3952904 | Verlinden | Apr 1976 | A |
4032047 | Wilson | Jun 1977 | A |
4482067 | Saito et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491247 | Nitchman | Jan 1985 | A |
4519219 | Prepodnik et al. | May 1985 | A |
4531656 | Nitchman | Jul 1985 | A |
4775072 | Lundblade et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4867348 | Dorfman | Sep 1989 | A |
5129534 | Dunn | Jul 1992 | A |
5267669 | Dixon et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5375741 | Harris | Dec 1994 | A |
5597085 | Rauworth et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5897016 | Wheaton | Apr 1999 | A |
6196277 | Till | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6260823 | Weber | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6308858 | Koefelda | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343916 | Bougamont et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6415959 | Bougamont et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6626314 | McHenry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6666358 | Field | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6748789 | Turner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751981 | Burnette | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6805267 | Bougamont et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7044292 | Nall | May 2006 | B2 |
7134578 | Bougamont et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7174762 | Turner et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7455082 | Monzel | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7546935 | Wheaton | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20040026461 | Bougamont et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20060049213 | Wheaton | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080251542 | Rossignol | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277001 | Wheaton | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090206505 | Monzel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090320264 | Berger et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100264140 | Apps | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110017737 | Apps | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110180535 | Apps | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1095897 | May 2001 | EP |
1947029 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2281753 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2665688 | Feb 1992 | FR |
437295 | Oct 1935 | GB |
2182319 | May 1987 | GB |
2188040 | Sep 1987 | GB |
2209740 | May 1989 | GB |
2283967 | May 1995 | GB |
9112196 | Aug 1991 | WO |
2004063087 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2006110948 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2008013819 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008083782 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for EP Application No. 09171548.2, Dec. 15, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100077790 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |