Plasticizer compositions and methods for making plasticizer compositions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10077355
  • Patent Number
    10,077,355
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 27, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 18, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
The present disclosure is directed to a plasticizer composition, polymeric compositions containing the plasticizer composition, and conductors coated with the polymeric composition. The plasticizer composition includes a first plasticizer comprising epoxidized fatty acid alkyl esters and a second plasticizer comprising an epoxidized natural oil. The plasticizer composition, first plasticizer, and/or second plasticizer can undergo one or more color-reducing treatment processes, such as distillation, filtration, and/or peroxide treatment.
Description
FIELD

Various embodiments of the present invention relate to plasticizers derived from natural oils (e.g., oils derived from biological sources). Other aspects of the invention concern a process for producing such plasticizers.


INTRODUCTION

Plasticizers are compounds or mixtures of compounds that are added to polymer resins to impart softness and flexibility. Phthalic acid diesters (also known as “phthalates”) are known plasticizers in many flexible polymer products, such as polymer products formed from polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) and other vinyl polymers. Examples of common phthalate plasticizers include di-isononyl phthalate, diallyl phthalate, di-2-ethylhexyl-phthalate, dioctyl phthalate, and diisodecyl phthalate. Other common plasticizers, used for high temperature applications, are trimellitates and adipic polyesters. Mixtures of plasticizers are often used to obtain optimum properties.


Phthalate plasticizers have recently come under intense scrutiny by public interest groups that are concerned about the negative environmental impact of phthalates and potential adverse health effects in humans (especially children) exposed to phthalates.


Epoxidized methyl ester of soybean oil (e.g., epoxidized fatty acid methyl ester, or “eFAME”) can be used as a plasticizer for polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) and other polymers (natural rubber, acrylate, etc.) or alternately, it can be used as a primary or secondary plasticizer in a plasticizer blend (such as with epoxidized soybean oil (“ESO”)). However, eFAME often contains various impurities that may cause color in plasticized compositions. Accordingly, improvements in such plasticizers are desired.


SUMMARY

One embodiment is a plasticizer composition comprising: a first plasticizer comprising epoxidized fatty acid alkyl esters; and a second plasticizer comprising an epoxidized natural oil, wherein said first plasticizer comprises fatty acid dimers in a concentration of less than 0.1 weight percent based on the entire weight of said first plasticizer.


Another embodiment is a method for producing a treated plasticizer, said method comprising:

    • (a) combining a first plasticizer and a second plasticizer to thereby form a plasticizer composition, wherein said first plasticizer comprises epoxidized fatty acid alkyl esters, wherein said second plasticizer comprises an epoxidized natural oil; and
    • (b) subjecting said first plasticizer, said second plasticizer, and/or said plasticizer composition to one or more color-reducing treatment processes to thereby produce said treated plasticizer,
    • wherein said color-reducing treatment process is selected from the group consisting of:
      • (i) contacting at least a portion of said first plasticizer, said second plasticizer, and/or said plasticizer composition with a peroxide;
      • (ii) filtering at least a portion of said first plasticizer, said second plasticizer, and/or said plasticizer composition;
      • (iii) distilling at least a portion of said first plasticizer prior to said combining of step (a); and
      • (iv) mixtures of two or more thereof.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments of the present invention concern plasticizers derived from natural oils. In one or more embodiments, the plasticizer includes an epoxidized natural oil (“eNO”). Additionally, the plasticizer includes a natural oil that has been epoxidized and esterified forming epoxidized fatty acid alkyl esters (“eFAAE”). In preparing such plasticizers, the eNO, eFAAE, and/or combinations thereof can undergo one or more color treatment processes. Such plasticizers can be employed with a variety of polymeric resins and in the making of various articles of manufacture.


Plasticizer


The present disclosure provides a plasticizer composed of an epoxidized fatty acid alkyl ester and an epoxidized natural oil. A plasticizer is a substance that can lower the modulus and tensile strength, and increase flexibility, elongation, impact strength, and tear strength of a polymeric resin (typically a thermoplastic polymer) to which it is added. A plasticizer may also lower the melting point of the polymeric resin, which lowers the glass transition temperature and enhances processability of the polymeric resin to which it is added. In an embodiment, the present plasticizer is a phthalate-free plasticizer, or is otherwise void or substantially void of phthalate.


The plasticizer includes an epoxidized fatty acid alkyl ester. The alkyl moiety of the ester may be, for example, a methyl group, an ethyl group, a propyl group, or a 2-ethylhexyl group. In an embodiment, the epoxidized fatty acid alkyl ester is an epoxidized fatty acid methyl ester (or “eFAME”). An “epoxidized fatty acid methyl ester” is a C4-C24 (saturated or unsaturated) carboxylic acid methyl ester with at least one epoxide group. An “epoxide group” is a three-member cyclic ether (also called oxirane or an alkylene oxide) in which an oxygen atom is joined to each of two carbon atoms that are already bonded to each other. Epoxidation reactions are typically performed with percarboxylic acids or other peroxy compounds.


The present plasticizer also includes an epoxidized natural oil (“eNO”). A “natural oil,” as used herein, is an oil composed of fatty acid triglycerides and derived from a microbe (algae, bacteria), a plant/vegetable, and/or a seed. In an embodiment, natural oil includes genetically-modified natural oil. In another embodiment, the natural oil excludes petroleum-derived oil. Non-limiting examples of suitable natural oils include beef tallow oil, canola oil, castor oil, corn oil, fish oil, linseed oil, palm oil, rapeseed oil, safflower oil, soybean oil, sunflower oil, tall oil, tung oil, and any combination thereof.


The term “epoxidized natural oil,” as used herein, is a natural oil wherein at least one fatty acid moiety contains at least one epoxide group. Epoxidation may occur by way of reaction of the natural oil with percarboxylic acid and/or other peroxy compounds.


Non-limiting examples of suitable eNO include epoxidized algae oil, epoxidized beef tallow oil, epoxidized canola oil, epoxidized castor oil, epoxidized corn oil, epoxidized fish oil, epoxidized linseed oil, epoxidized palm oil, epoxidized rapeseed oil, epoxidized safflower oil, epoxidized soybean oil, epoxidized sunflower oil, epoxidized tall oil, epoxidized tung oil, and any combination thereof.


In an embodiment, the epoxidized natural oil is an epoxidized soybean oil (“eSO”).


In an embodiment, the plasticizer contains relative amounts of eNO (e.g., eSO) to eFAAE (e.g., eFAME) in a weight ratio in the range of from greater than (“>”) 0:less than (“<”) 100 to <100:>0, more typically from 10:90 to 90:10, more typically from 20:80 to 80:20, and even more typically from 30:70 to 70:30. Weight ratios are based on total weight of the plasticizer.


In an embodiment, the plasticizer can undergo one or more color-reducing treatment processes. Such color-reducing treatment processes include distillation, filtration, treatment with a peroxide, and mixtures of two or more thereof.


In an embodiment, the color-reducing treatment includes distilling the above-described eFAAE (e.g., eFAME) prior to combining it with the eNO. Conventional distillation techniques are employed. For example, distillation can be performed with a wiped film evaporator (“WFE”) and a condenser. In an embodiment, the distillation is performed employing a WFE at a temperature ranging from 120 to 180° C., from 140 to 170° C., or from 150 to 160° C. The condenser can have a temperature of 20° C.


In an embodiment, the color-reducing treatment includes filtering at least a portion of the eNO, the eFAAE, and/or the blended plasticizer composition. Conventional filtration techniques are employed. Illustrative examples of suitable filter media include Magnesol D60™ (available from The Dallas Group of America, Inc), Pure Flow B80™ (available from Oil Dri Corporation of America), activated alumina (available from Sigma-Aldrich or Delta adsorbents), fuller's earth clay (available from Sigma-Aldrich), and perlite (e.g., PF60™, available from The Schundler Company). In an embodiment, the plasticizer or blended plasticizer is stirred with the filtration medium for a time (e.g., 60 minutes) at elevated temperature (e.g., 40° C.). As used herein, the term “elevated temperature” denotes any temperature greater than ambient temperature. Thereafter, the mixture is filtered using, for example, a 1 micrometer (“μm”) filter paper over an 11 μm filter paper, applying vacuum to accelerate filtration.


In an embodiment, the color-reducing treatment includes contacting at least a portion of the eNO, the eFAAE, and/or the blended plasticizer composition with a peroxide. In various embodiments, the plasticizer or plasticizer blend can be treated with peroxide solution at a concentration of from 1 to 3 wt % based on the combined weight of the peroxide solution and plasticizer. The mixture can then be stirred for a time (e.g., 60 minutes). The peroxide can be any peroxide known in the art. Peroxides generally have a structure R1OOR2, where R1 and R2 can be the same or different, and can be hydrogen, aliphatic, or aromatic groups. In various embodiments, the peroxide solution can be hydrogen peroxide (“H2O2”). The peroxide solution can be, for example, a 30% by weight aqueous solution.


In various embodiments, the eFAAE (e.g., eFAME) of the treated plasticizer comprises fatty acid dimers in a concentration of less than 0.1, less than 0.05, or less than 0.02 weight percent based on the entire weight of the eFAAE. Fatty acid dimer content can be determined by chromatographic analyses, as described in the Test Procedures below. Fatty acid dimers include molecules having two combined fatty acid aliphatic chains. The fatty acid aliphatic chains can be saturated, unsaturated, and/or epoxidized. Non-limiting examples of fatty acid dimers include molecules having structures such as:




embedded image


In various embodiments, the eFAAE (e.g., eFAME) of the treated plasticizer comprises fatty acid trimers in a concentration of less than 0.1, less than 0.05, or less than 0.02 weight percent based on the entire weight of the eFAAE. Fatty acid trimer content can be determined by chromatographic analyses, as described in the Test Procedures below. Fatty acid trimers include molecules having three combined fatty acid aliphatic chains (e.g., triglycerides). The fatty acid aliphatic chains can be saturated, unsaturated, and/or epoxidized. Non-limiting examples of fatty acid trimers include molecules having structures such as:




embedded image


In various embodiments, the eFAAE (e.g., eFAME) of the treated plasticizer comprises a combined concentration of fatty acid dimers and fatty acid trimers in total amount of less than 0.1, less than 0.05, or less than 0.02 weight percent based on the entire weight of the eFAAE.


In various embodiments, the treated eFAAE, the treated eNO, and/or the treated combination thereof can have an American Public Health Association (“APHA”) color index value of less than 100, less than 90, less than 80, less than 70, less than 60, less than 50, less than 40, or less than 30 upon heat aging at 190° C. for 60 minutes. Heat aging is performed according to the procedure described in the following Examples. APHA color is determined according to ASTM standards E1209 and E313.


Polymeric Composition


The present disclosure provides a polymeric composition. In an embodiment, a polymeric composition is provided which includes a polymeric resin and the present plasticizer as disclosed above.


Non-limiting examples of suitable polymeric resins include polysulfides, polyurethanes, acrylics, epichlorohydrins, nitrile rubber, chlorosulfonated polyethylene, chlorinated polyethylene, polychloroprene, styrene butadiene rubber, natural rubber, synthetic rubber, EPDM rubber, propylene-based polymers, ethylene-based polymers, and vinyl chloride resins. The term, “propylene-based polymer,” as used herein, is a polymer that comprises a majority weight percent polymerized propylene monomer (based on the total amount of polymerizable monomers), and optionally may comprise at least one polymerized comonomer. The term, “ethylene-based polymer,” as used herein, is a polymer that comprises a majority weight percent polymerized ethylene monomer (based on the total weight of polymerizable monomers), and optionally may comprise at least one polymerized comonomer.


The term “vinyl chloride resin,” as used herein, is a vinyl chloride polymer, such as polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”), or a vinyl chloride copolymer such as vinyl chloride/vinyl acetate copolymer, vinyl chloride/vinylidene chloride copolymer, vinyl chloride/ethylene copolymer or a copolymer prepared by grafting vinyl chloride onto ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer. The vinyl chloride resin can also include a polymer blend of the above-mentioned vinyl chloride polymer or vinyl chloride copolymer with other miscible or compatible polymers including, but not limited to, chlorinated polyethylene, thermoplastic polyurethane, olefin polymers such as a methacryl polymer or acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymer.


In an embodiment, the vinyl chloride resin is PVC.


In an embodiment, the polymeric composition includes from 40 wt % to 50 wt % PVC, from 5 wt % to 20 wt % eFAAE, from 5 wt % to 20 wt % eNO, and from greater than 0 wt % to 35 wt % filler.


Additives


The polymeric composition may include one or more of the following optional additives: a filler, a flame retardant, a heat stabilizer, an anti-drip agent, a colorant, a lubricant, a low molecular weight polyethylene, a hindered amine light stabilizer, a UV light absorber, a curing agent, a booster, a retardant, a processing aid, a coupling agent, an antistatic agent, a nucleating agent, a slip agent, a viscosity control agent, a tackifier, an anti-blocking agent, a surfactant, an extender oil, an acid scavenger, a metal deactivator, and any combination thereof.


In an embodiment, the polymeric composition includes PVC, the present plasticizer, a filler (calcium carbonate, clays, silica, and any combination thereof), metal soap stabilizers (zinc stearate or mixed metal stabilizers containing Ca, Zn, Mg, Sn, and any combination thereof), a phenolic or related antioxidant, and a processing aid.


Coated Conductor


The present disclosure provides a coated conductor. The coated conductor includes a conductor and a coating on the conductor, the coating formed from the polymeric composition described above.


A “conductor,” as used herein, is one or more wire(s) or fiber(s) for conducting heat, light, and/or electricity. The conductor may be a single-wire/fiber or a multi-wire/fiber and may be in strand form or in tubular form. Non-limiting examples of suitable conductors include metals such as silver, gold, copper, carbon, and aluminum. The conductor may also be optical fiber made from either glass or plastic.


The coated conductor may be flexible, semi-rigid, or rigid. The coating (also referred to as a “jacket” or a “sheath” or “insulation”) is on the conductor or on another polymeric layer around the conductor.


Definitions

As used herein, the term “and/or,” when used in a list of two or more items, means that any one of the listed items can be employed by itself or any combination of two or more of the listed items can be employed. For example, if a composition is described as containing components A, B, and/or C, the composition can contain A alone; B alone; C alone; A and B in combination; A and C in combination; B and C in combination; or A, B, and C in combination.


“Natural oil” means an oil derived from one or more biological sources (e.g., seeds, vegetables, fish, animal fats, bacteria, or algae), as opposed to an oil derived from petroleum or other mineral source.


“Epoxidation” means a process of forming an epoxide, also known as an oxirane or alkylene oxide.


“Fatty acid” means a carboxylic acid composed of an aliphatic chain typically containing 4 to 24 carbon atoms with a terminal carboxyl group (—COOH). The fatty acid can be saturated or unsaturated, branched or unbranched, and may or may not include one or more hydroxyl group(s).


“Epoxidized fatty acid ester” means a compound with at least one fatty acid ester moiety which contains at least one epoxide group.


“Wire” means a single strand of conductive metal, e.g., copper or aluminum, or a single strand of optical fiber.


“Cable” means at least one wire or optical fiber within a sheath (e.g., an insulation covering or a protective outer jacket). Typically, a cable is two or more wires or optical fibers bound together, typically in a common insulation covering and/or protective jacket. The individual wires or fibers inside the sheath may be bare, covered or insulated. Combination cables may contain both electrical wires and optical fibers. The cable can be designed for low, medium, and/or high voltage applications. Typical cable designs are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,246,783, 6,496,629 and 6,714,707.


TEST METHODS

APHA Color Measurement


Measure liquid color according to ASTM standards E1209 and E313 using a BYK Gardner LCS III™ instrument and measure in APHA units. Set up the bench-top instrument and perform calibration check to insure the instrument is working within specifications. Measure sample color using the protocol listed below:

    • Set LCS III to measure Hazen/Alpha indices;
    • Measure each sample via syringe (10 mL) into individual calibrated cuvettes;
    • Place each loaded cuvette into the LCS III and press the test button; a Hazen/Alpha number is generated. Record this number, remove the sample and place back into the LCS III to measure a second time (record data). Repeat for a third time (record data).
    • Remove the loaded cuvette and set aside; reset the LCS III to measure Yellowness Index, measure the same cuvette for Yellowness Index (record three measurements).


      Heat Aging


Heat each plasticizer sample in a type II convection oven at 190° C. Collect samples at time intervals indicated in the following Examples and rest on a table top to cool. After 24 hours, measure APHA values of each sample.


Distillation


Distillation Method for eFAME: Samples 1a-e


Employing a 2 inch molecular still, degas the sample under the following conditions:









TABLE 1





Degassing (Pass 1):


















Wiped Film Evaporator (“WFE”)
120



Temperature (° C.)




System Pressure (Torr)
8.000



Condenser Temp. (° C.)
15



Wiper Speed (rpm)
400



Distillate Recovered (g)
0.0



Residue Recovered (g)
975.0



Total Recovered (g)
975.0



Sampling Time (min.)
140



Feed Rate (g/hr.)
418



Distillate Recovered (wt %)
0.0



Residue Recovered (wt %)
100.0










Use the residue stream from Pass 1 as feed for the distillation in Pass 2.









TABLE 2







Distillation (Pass 2):












Sample:
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e















WFE Temperature (° C.)
150
160
170
140
145


System Pressure (Torr)
0.035
0.035
0.035
0.035
0.035


Condenser Temp. (° C.)
20
20
20
20
20


Wiper Speed, rpm
400
400
400
400
400


Distillate Recovered (g)
105.0
138.0
111.0
80.0
101.0


Residue Recovered (g)
40.0
25.0
6.0
100.0
40.0


Total Recovered (g)
145.0
163.0
117.0
180.0
141.0


Sampling Time (min.)
20
25
20
28
26


Feed Rate (g/hr.)
435
391
351
386
325


Distillate Recovered (wt %)
72.4
84.7
94.9
44.4
71.6


Residue Recovered (wt %)
27.6
15.3
5.1
55.6
28.4










Distillation Method for TeFAME: Samples 2a-e


Employing a 2 inch molecular still, degas the sample under the following conditions:









TABLE 3





Degassing (Pass 1):


















WFE Temperature (° C.)
120



System Pressure (Torr)
8.000



Condenser Temp. (° C.)
15



Wiper Speed (rpm)
400



Distillate Recovered (g)
3.0



Residue Recovered (g)
980.0



Total Recovered (g)
983.0



Sampling Time (min.)
110



Feed Rate (g/hr)
536



Distillate Recovered (wt %)
0.3



Residue Recovered (wt %)
99.7










Use the residue stream from Pass 1 as feed for the distillation in Pass 2.









TABLE 4







Distillation (Pass 2):












Sample:
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e















WFE Temperature (° C.)
140
145
150
160
170


System Pressure (Torr)
0.063
0.065
0.064
0.067
0.065


Condenser Temp. (° C.)
20
20
20
20
20


Wiper Speed (rpm)
400
400
400
400
400


Distillate Recovered (g)
143.0
154.0
122.0
145.0
148.0


Residue Recovered (g)
37.0
33.0
13.0
10.0
7.0


Total Recovered (g)
180.0
187.0
135.0
155.0
155.0


Sampling Time (min.)
22
22
17
19
20


Feed Rate (g/hr.)
491
510
476
489
465


Distillate Recovered (wt %)
79.4
82.4
90.4
93.5
95.5


Residue Recovered (wt %)
20.6
17.6
9.6
6.5
4.5










Electrical Performance Testing


A Baur DTL C™ oil tester is used to measure electrical performance. Before testing each fluid, the dielectric test cell is thoroughly cleaned with Heptane. The empty cell is then calibrated to obtain the empty cell capacitance and check for contamination. The cell is filled with the test fluid and heated to the appropriate test temperature, typically 25° C. The εr and tan δ are measured first according to ASTM D924, in which the test voltage is 2000 V (1000V/mm). The direct current resistivity is measured after εr/tan δ so as to prevent any effects of polarization on the following measurements. The resistivity is measured per ASTM D1169, in which 500 V of positive polarity is first applied and the resistivity measured followed by a discharging of the cell and subsequent measurement with negative polarity. The data is then reported as an average of the two readings.


Chromatographic Analyses


The samples were analyzed using a gas chromatography (“GC”) system with the following conditions:

    • Instrument: Agilent 6890 GC™
    • Column: RTx-Biodiesel TG™ (Restek), 15 m×0.32 mm×0.1-μm film
    • Injection: Split, Restek precision double wool liner
    • Injection Volume: 1.0 μL
    • Detection: flame ionization (FID)
    • Carrier Gas: He
    • Carrier Pressure: 8 psi, constant pressure
    • Split flow: 123 mL/min
    • Split ratio: 40
    • Hydrogen: 30 mL/min
    • Air: 350 mL/min
    • Makeup: 25 mL/min
    • Injector Temp: 340° C.
    • Detector Temp: 350° C.
    • Temperature Program: Initial Temp: 60° C. for 1 min.
    • Ramp Rate: 15° C./min
    • Final Temp: 350° C. for 20 min
    • Data System: Thermo Atlas v 8.2


      Filtration


With a sample size of 100 mL, stir the sample with the filtration medium for 60 minutes at 40° C. Thereafter, filter the solution using a 1 micrometer (“μm”) filter paper over an 11 μm filter paper, applying vacuum to accelerate filtration. Filtration media are as follows:

    • Magnesol D-60™ (available from the Dallas Group of America, Inc.)—synthetic magnesium silicate.
    • Pure Flow B-80™ bleaching clay (available from Oil Dri Corporation of America)—mixture of montmorillonite type clay with fuller's earth clay and small levels of quartz.
    • Activated alumina (available from Sigma-Aldrich)—alumina, highly porous with surface area over 200 m2/g. Produced from aluminum hydroxide.
    • Fuller's earth clay (available from Sigma-Aldrich)—extraction: 100% naturally occurring quarry mined (intergrowth of hormite and smectite minerals). Typical mineral content: silica (70.85%); sapphire crystal (14.06%); magnesium oxide (5.71%); iron oxide (5.34%), calcium oxide (1.62%).
    • Perlite PF-60™ (available from The Schundler Company)—Perlite is essentially an amorphous, hydrated glassy volcanic rock of rhyolitic composition, consisting primarily of fused sodium potassium aluminum silicate.


      Peroxide Treatment


As indicated below, add either 1 or 3 wt % of 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution to the neat plasticizer sample and stir for about 60 minutes with a magnetic stir bar and stirrer. Weight percent of hydrogen peroxide is based on the combined weight of the neat plasticizer sample and the hydrogen peroxide. Perform reaction in a jar.


EXAMPLES
Example 1—Initial Color Analyses of Distilled Samples

Sample 1 Comp is an undistilled eFAME comparative sample. Distill eFAME Samples 1a through 1e according to procedure outlined above. Prior to distillation, the epoxidized samples are prepared according to the following general procedure for epoxidation. If the starting raw material is a fatty acid methyl ester (“FAME”), then epoxidation leads to eFAME; if the starting raw material is soybean oil, then epoxidation leads to ESO.


Typically ester or soybean oil, peroxide, and formic acid are combined in 1:2:0.5 proportions, respectively. 50 g of ester (or soybean oil) and corresponding amount of formic acid are weighed in a 3-necked round-bottomed flask (“RBF”) equipped with a mechanical stirrer, condenser and a dropper for controlled addition of H2O2. The mixture of ester and formic acid are stirred at a speed of 400 rpm at 30° C. Calculated amount of hydrogen peroxide (30 or 50 wt %) is added at the rate of 10 mL/hr and then slowly increasing the rate to the required flow rate depending on the exothermicity of the reaction. Addition is generally completed within an hour. The reaction temperature is then raised to 40 or 50° C. and the reaction is continued until the oxirane oxygen value does not increase further. Stirring is stopped and layers are separated. Oil layer is first washed with water followed by dilute potassium hydroxide and again with water or brine. The oil layer is then dried under vacuum.


Sample 2 Comp is an undistilled TeFAME comparative sample. Distill TeFAME Samples 2a through 2e according to the procedure outlined above. The TeFAME samples are prepared according to the following general procedure. Oleic acid (60 g), methanol or any other alcohol (33.92 g), and sulfuric acid (1 wt % of acid, 0.6 g) are weighed in a 2 necked RBF equipped with condenser and temperature sensor. The reaction mixture is heated in an oil batch at 65° C. under nitrogen flow for 6 hours. In some reactions water may form during the reaction, which can be azeotropically removed using toluene. After the reaction, the mixture is washed with water and potassium carbonate to remove unreacted oleic acid, followed by wash with water or brine. Excess alcohol is removed using a rotary evaporator. The final product is dried under vacuum.


Following distillation, analyze each sample for color according to the procedure outlined above.









TABLE 5







Initial Color of Distilled Samples












Average Color



Sample
WFE Temperature (° C.)
(APHA)
Std. Dev.













1 Comp

8
1


1a
150
4
1


1b
160
4
2


1c
170
6
1


1d
140
3
1


1e
145
3
2


2 Comp

249
1


2a
140
18
0


2b
145
19
1


2c
150
22
2


2d
160
31
2


2e
170
41
1









Example 2—Heat Aged Color Analyses of Distilled Samples

Heat age each sample as prepared in Example 1 according to the heat aging procedure outlined above. Analyze each sample for color according to the procedure outlined above.









TABLE 6







Heat Aged Color of Distilled Samples












WFE
Heat Aging
Average




Temperature
(@190° C.)
Color



Sample
(° C.)
Time (min.)
(APHA)
Std. Dev.














1

0
8
1


Comp






1

10
10
1


Comp






1

25
11
1


Comp






1

45
32
2


Comp






1

60
112
1


Comp






1a
150
0
4
1


1a
150
10
7
1


1a
150
25
10
1


1a
150
45
15
1


1a
150
60
37
1


1b
160
0
4
2


1b
160
10
6
1


1b
160
25
11
1


1b
160
45
18
2


1b
160
60
48
1


1c
170
0
6
1


1c
170
10
9
1


1c
170
25
16
2


1c
170
60
78
1


1d
140
0
3
1


1d
140
10
7
1


1d
140
25
10
2


1d
140
45
13
1


1d
140
60
27
1


1e
145
0
3
2


1e
145
10
10
1


1e
145
25
8
1


1e
145
45
14
2


1e
145
60
22
1


2

0
249
1


Comp






2

10
305
1


Comp






2

25
469
1


Comp






2

45
746
1


Comp






2

60
1000
0


Comp






2a
140
0
18
0


2a
140
10
19
1


2a
140
25
22
2


2a
140
45
24
1


2a
140
60
25
0


2b
145
0
19
1


2b
145
10
18
1


2b
145
25
25
1


2b
145
45
23
2


2b
145
60
27
1


2c
150
0
22
2


2c
150
10
21
1


2c
150
25
25
1


2c
150
45
32
1


2c
150
60
33
1


2d
160
0
31
2


2d
160
10
30
1


2d
160
25
40
1


2d
160
45
56
1


2d
160
60
56
2


2e
170
0
41
1


2e
170
10
43
1


2e
170
25
51
1


2e
170
45
90
2


2e
170
60
85
2









All distilled samples show decreased color upon heat aging as compared to undistilled control samples, particularly at longer aging times (e.g., 60 minutes).


Example 3—Electrical Performance of Distilled Samples

Analyze each sample as prepared in Example 1 according to the electrical performance testing procedure outlined above.









TABLE 7







Electrical Performance of Distilled Samples












Insulation
Insulation





Resistance
Resistance
Test
Test


Sample
(Rho+)
(Rho−)
Voltage (V)
Temp (° C.)














1 Comp
6.67E+07
6.14E+07
500
25.2


1a
3.00E+08
3.29E+08
500
25.3


1b
1.94E+08
2.15E+08
499.8
25.2


1c
1.03E+08
1.07E+08
499.8
25.1


1d
5.11E+08
5.45E+08
500
25.3


1e
3.02E+08
3.24E+08
499.8
25.3


2 Comp
1.64E+08
1.66E+08
499.8
25.6


2a
4.44E+08
4.64E+08
499.8
25.1


2b
5.11E+08
5.14E+08
499.8
25.2


2c
3.26E+08
3.32E+08
500
25.3


2d
2.06E+08
2.10E+08
500
25.2


2e
1.54E+08
1.56E+08
499.8
25.5









Distillation of the eFAME and TeFAME samples increased insulation resistance in all samples except for 2e.


Example 4—Chromatographic Analyses of Distilled and Control eFAME Samples

Prepare samples for injection as follows: weigh 100 μL of sample and 100 μL of pentadecane internal standard into a vial. Add approximately 5 mL of tetrahydrofuran (“THF”) and mix the resulting solution thoroughly. Place an aliquot of this solution in a 2-mL autosampler vial and analyze using the GC conditions and Samples 1 Comp and 1a-e, described above.









TABLE 8







Chromatographic Analyses of Distilled and Control eFAME Samples














Sample
Palmitate
Stearate
Monoepoxy
Diepoxy
Triepoxy
Dimers



Name
(wt %)a
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
Total

















1 Comp
10.69
4.60
22.51
49.03
8.63
0.53
95.98


Residue
0.18
0.10
3.85
55.34
22.66
2.74
84.87


Sample 1a









Residue
0.05
0.08
2.40
28.49
32.05
7.99
71.06


Sample 1b









Residue
0.04
0.07
2.19
19.32
24.36
16.48
62.46


Sample 1c









Residue
0.02
0.25
13.79
60.76
12.99
1.28
89.09


Sample 1d









Residue
0.01
0.04
4.76
55.01
21.25
2.62
83.69


Sample 1e









Distillate
15.10
5.83
29.25
45.50
2.84
n.d.b
98.53


Sample 1a









Distillate
12.19
4.73
24.55
49.71
4.91
n.d.
96.09


Sample 1b









Distillate
11.45
4.44
23.16
49.06
6.45
n.d.
94.54


Sample 1c









Distillate
25.19
9.46
34.37
31.84
1.35
n.d.
102.21


Sample 1d









Distillate
15.63
5.98
29.34
44.59
2.55
n.d.
98.08


Sample 1e













aWeight percents reported as an average of two injections




bNot detected







Example 5—Initial Color Analyses of Filtered Samples

Employing a blend of ESO and eFAME plasticizers, each prepared according to the procedure outlined in Example 1, prepare five filtered samples according to the procedure outlined above and employing the following weight ratios:









TABLE 9







Filtered Sample Preparation














Sample:
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e


















ESO
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5



eFAME
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5



Magnesol D60
5







Pure Flow B-80

5






Activate alumina


5





Fuller's earth clay



5




Perlite PF-60




5










Analyze each sample for color according to the procedure outlined above. Sample 3 Comp is an unfiltered comparative sample with a 50/50 wt/wt blend of ESO and eFAME.









TABLE 10







Initial Color of Filtered Samples










Sample
Color (APHA)







3 Comp
44



3a
30



3b
40



3c
32



3d
65



3e
54










Samples treated with Magnesol D 60™, Pure Flow B-80™ and activated alumina show a decline in initial color.


Example 6—Heat Aged Color Analyses of Filtered Samples

Heat age each sample as prepared in Example 5 according to the heat aging procedure outlined above. Analyze each sample for color according to the procedure outlined above.









TABLE 11







Heat Aged Color of Filtered Samples












Heat Aging
Average

Percent Increase in



(@190° C.)
Color

Color upon Aging


Sample
Time (min.)
(APHA)
Std. Dev.
(%)














3
0
44
2
0


Comp






3
10
54
1
24


Comp






3
15
74
2
70


Comp






3
25
91
4
108


Comp






3
40
209
2
379


Comp






3
60
410
1
840


Comp






3
80
562
3
1187


Comp






3
100
577
3
1221


Comp






3a
0
22
3
0


3a
10
26
2
16


3a
25
19
1
−15


3a
40
61
3
172


3a
60
341
1
1428


3a
90
445
1
1894


3a
120
536
1
2299


3b
0
31
7
0


3b
10
36
2
17


3b
25
38
1
24


3b
40
64
4
108


3b
60
314
1
912


3b
90
437
1
1309


3b
120
549
2
1671


3c
0
30
1
0


3c
10
29
1
−2


3c
25
29
1
−3


3c
40
61
6
102


3c
60
303
1
909


3c
90
447
3
1390


3c
120
581
2
1837


3d
0
61
1
0


3d
10
63
2
3


3d
25
61
1
0


3d
40
97
1
59


3d
60
365
1
495


3d
90
546
0
790


3d
120
674
4
998


3e
0
52
2
0


3e
10
53
1
2


3e
25
54
3
3


3e
40
92
1
75


3e
60
344
1
557


3e
90
509
7
873


3e
120
642
1
1126









All samples showed significant reduction in color formulation during elevated thermal aging cycle with up to 60% reduction in color after 40 minutes of aging at 190° C.


Example 7—Heat Aged Color Analyses of Peroxide-Treated Samples

Prepare the following samples according to the peroxide treatment described above. Samples 4 Comp, 5 Comp, and 6 Comp are left untreated as comparative samples. Weight percent of peroxide is based on combined weight of H2O2 solution and plasticizer.









TABLE 12







Peroxide-treated Sample Preparation












Plasticizer
Peroxide Treatment



Sample
type
Amount (wt %)







4 Comp
eFAME




4a
eFAME
1



4b
eFAME
3



5 Comp
eFAME




5
eFAME
1



6 Comp
ESO




6
ESO
1










Heat age each sample according to the heat aging procedure outlined above. Analyze each sample for color according to the procedure outlined above.









TABLE 13







Heat Aged Color of Peroxide-treated Samples












Heat Aging
Average

Percent Increase in



(@190° C.)
Color

Color upon Aging


Sample
Time (min.)
(APHA)
Std. Dev.
(%)














4
0
85
0
0


Comp






4
10
95
3
11


Comp






4
25
117
2
38


Comp






4
40
143
1
69


Comp






4
60
195
6
129


Comp






4
90
264
4
211


Comp






4
120
265
1
212


Comp






4a
0
72
0
0


4a
10
77
2
6


4a
25
83
2
16


4a
40
79
2
10


4a
60
89
1
24


4a
90
238
1
230


4a
120
463
3
544


4b
0
80
3
0


4b
25
67
2
−16


4b
60
60
1
−25


4b
120
649
1
712


5
0
11
2
0


Comp






5
10
18
3
66


Comp






5
15
25
1
137


Comp






5
25
46
2
328


Comp






5
40
135
1
1163


Comp






5
60
294
4
2659


Comp






5
80
441
1
4031


Comp






5
100
460
1
4212


Comp






5
0
7
1
0


5
10
10
1
41


5
25
14
0
91


5
40
30
2
314


5
60
265
1
3518


5
90
561
2
7550


5
120
929
3
12568


6
0
17
1
0


Comp






6
10
22
5
31


Comp






6
25
96
3
467


Comp






6
40
243
2
1327


Comp






6
60
658
2
3769


Comp






6
90
1000
0
5782


Comp






6
120
1000
0
5782


Comp






6
0
100
2
0


6
10
95
1
−5


6
25
89
3
−10


6
40
86
4
−14


6
60
96
3
−4


6
120
444
13
346









Color improvements can be seen during initial cycle of heat aging (i.e., up to 60 minutes) at 190° C. for samples 4a, 4b, and 5, in comparison to comparative samples 4 Comp and 5 Comp. Color improvements are seen over a longer period of the heat aging cycle for sample 6 in comparison to comparative sample 6 Comp.

Claims
  • 1. A method for producing a treated plasticizer, said method comprising: (a) combining a first plasticizer and a second plasticizer to thereby form a plasticizer composition, wherein said first plasticizer comprises epoxidized fatty acid alkyl esters, wherein said second plasticizer comprises an epoxidized natural oil; and(b) subjecting said first plasticizer, said second plasticizer, and/or said plasticizer composition to one or more color-reducing treatment processes to thereby produce said treated plasticizer,wherein said color-reducing treatment process is selected from the group consisting of:(i) contacting at least a portion of said first plasticizer, said second plasticizer, and/or said plasticizer composition with a peroxide;(ii) filtering at least a portion of said first plasticizer, said second plasticizer, and/or said plasticizer composition;(iii) distilling at least a portion of said first plasticizer prior to said combining of step (a); and(iv) mixtures of two or more thereof,wherein said color-reducing treatment process comprises process (iii), wherein said distillation is performed at a temperature in the range of from 120 to 180° C.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said epoxidized fatty acid alkyl esters are epoxidized fatty acid methyl esters, wherein said epoxidized natural oil is an epoxidized soybean oil.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said color-reducing treatment process further comprises process (i), wherein said peroxide is hydrogen peroxide.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said color-reducing treatment process further comprises process (ii), wherein said filtering is performed by passing at least a portion of said first plasticizer, said second plasticizer, and/or said plasticizer composition through a filter media selected from the group consisting of synthetic magnesium silicate, bleaching clay, montmorillonite clay, fuller's earth clay, activated alumina, perlite, and mixtures of two or more thereof.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said first plasticizer has an APHA value of less than 100 upon heat aging at 190° C. for 60 minutes following said color-reducing treatment process.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said plasticizer composition has an APHA value that is less than the APHA value of an identical reference plasticizer composition that has not undergone any of said color-reducing treatment processes of step (b) upon heat aging both said plasticizer composition and said reference plasticizer composition at 190° C. for 60 minutes.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/370,883, which was a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2013/023362 filed on Jan. 28, 2013, which claimed priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/596,432 filed on Feb. 8, 2012 entitled “PLASTICIZER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR MAKING PLASTICIZER COMPOSITIONS,” the teachings of each of which are incorporated by reference herein, as if reproduced in full hereinbelow.

US Referenced Citations (76)
Number Name Date Kind
2397592 Blades Apr 1946 A
2403215 Foster Jul 1946 A
2458484 Terry et al. Jan 1949 A
2500918 Rueter et al. Mar 1950 A
2618622 Grummit et al. Nov 1952 A
2666752 Grummit et al. Jan 1954 A
3138566 Arnold Jun 1964 A
3409580 Alzner Nov 1968 A
3639318 Tijunelis et al. Feb 1972 A
3668091 French et al. Jun 1972 A
3712875 Tijunelis Jan 1973 A
3778465 Bamstorf Dec 1973 A
3780140 Hammer Dec 1973 A
3868341 Sauer et al. Feb 1975 A
3872187 Fath Mar 1975 A
3891694 Mills et al. Jun 1975 A
4083816 Frankel et al. Apr 1978 A
4346145 Choi et al. Aug 1982 A
4421886 Worschech et al. Dec 1983 A
4426477 Yasumatsu et al. Jan 1984 A
4556694 Wallace Dec 1985 A
4605694 Walker Aug 1986 A
4612192 Scheuffgen et al. Sep 1986 A
4613533 Loomis et al. Sep 1986 A
4627993 Loomis Dec 1986 A
4670494 Semenza, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4689429 Mertz Aug 1987 A
4857600 Gross et al. Aug 1989 A
5225108 Bae et al. Jul 1993 A
5227417 Kroushl, III Jul 1993 A
5246783 Spenadel et al. Sep 1993 A
5270366 Hein Dec 1993 A
5278236 Case et al. Jan 1994 A
5430108 Schlosberg et al. Jul 1995 A
5454806 Shinonome Oct 1995 A
5464903 Hofmann Nov 1995 A
5466267 Baillargeon et al. Nov 1995 A
5575965 Caronia et al. Nov 1996 A
5736605 Oshima Apr 1998 A
5756570 Hoch et al. May 1998 A
5886072 Linsky et al. Mar 1999 A
6063846 Weng et al. May 2000 A
6114425 Day et al. Sep 2000 A
6274750 Sato et al. Aug 2001 B1
6417260 Weng et al. Jul 2002 B1
6437170 Thil et al. Aug 2002 B1
6451958 Fan et al. Sep 2002 B1
6495033 Talboom Dec 2002 B1
6496629 Ma et al. Dec 2002 B2
6608142 Weng et al. Aug 2003 B1
6706815 Marchand et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714707 Rossi et al. Mar 2004 B2
6734241 Nielsen et al. May 2004 B1
6797753 Benecke et al. Sep 2004 B2
6849694 Hata Feb 2005 B2
6949597 Nielsen et al. Sep 2005 B2
7700675 Bueno de Almeida et al. Apr 2010 B2
8557139 Eaton Oct 2013 B2
20020013396 Benecke et al. Jan 2002 A1
20040122159 Mhetar et al. Jun 2004 A1
20050090590 Nielsen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050203230 Kadakia et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060025544 Koube et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060276575 Hamaguchi et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070100049 Ishizuka May 2007 A1
20070135562 Freese et al. Jun 2007 A1
20080200595 Hinault et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227993 Zuckerman Sep 2008 A1
20090149585 De Quadros Junior et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090149586 De Quadros Junior et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090312478 Hasegawa et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010127 Barki et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100256278 Harada et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110076502 Chaudhary et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110272174 Chaudhary Nov 2011 A1
20130005937 Cramail et al. Jan 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (55)
Number Date Country
1188445 Jun 1985 CA
1341681 Mar 2002 CN
101108982 Jan 2006 CN
101070510 Nov 2007 CN
101376631 Mar 2009 CN
101591588 Dec 2009 CN
101824193 Sep 2010 CN
101914219 Dec 2010 CN
0192961 Sep 1986 EP
0358179 Mar 1990 EP
0364717 Apr 1990 EP
0 393 813 Oct 1990 EP
0473915 Mar 1992 EP
0565984 Oct 1993 EP
0986606 Mar 2000 EP
1218443 Jul 2002 EP
1361039 Nov 2003 EP
1624014 Feb 2006 EP
2070977 Jun 2009 EP
2245089 Nov 2010 EP
1437722 May 1966 FR
499931 Jan 1939 GB
790314 Feb 1958 GB
910543 Nov 1962 GB
934689 Aug 1963 GB
1022920 Apr 1964 GB
1102506 Feb 1968 GB
1341623 Dec 1973 GB
2155021 Sep 1985 GB
S44-007131 Mar 1969 JP
S61-016950 Jan 1986 JP
04-059851 Feb 1992 JP
H04-085354 Mar 1992 JP
H04-261452 Sep 1992 JP
2000-319468 Nov 2000 JP
2003-064233 Mar 2003 JP
2003-297149 Oct 2003 JP
2004311064 Nov 2004 JP
2010-042669 Feb 2010 JP
9730115 Aug 1997 WO
0114466 Mar 2001 WO
0198404 Dec 2001 WO
2004052977 Jun 2004 WO
2007006489 Jan 2007 WO
2008081330 Jul 2008 WO
2008081332 Jul 2008 WO
2008122364 Oct 2008 WO
2009102877 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2009102877 Aug 2009 WO
2011041380 Apr 2011 WO
2011041388 Apr 2011 WO
2011041372 Apr 2011 WO
2011041380 Apr 2011 WO
2011041388 Apr 2011 WO
2013003225 Jan 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (55)
Entry
CN 101376631 A, 03-2009m Derwent Ab.
PCT/US2010/050699 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 8, 2010.
PCT/US2011/035143 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 30, 2011.
PCT/US2011/041557 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 7, 2011.
PCT/US2011/045653 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 8, 2011.
PCT/US2012/043740 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 28, 2013.
PCT/US2012/055070 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 10, 2012.
Danisco, Grindsted Soft-n-Safe brochure 2007/2008.
Barnicoat, C.R. 1945. Reactions and properties of annatto as a cheese colour. Part II. J. Dairy Res. 14: 59-63.
Bizzari, S.N. et al (2003), Plasticizers. CEH Marketing Research Report, 38-64, Retrieved from http://www.sriconsulting.com.
Campanella A. et al.; High Yield Epoxidation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters with Performic Acid Generated In Situ; Chemical Engineering Journal, 144 (2008) 466-475 (Elsevier B.V.).
Chuanshang Cai, et al.; Studies on the Kinetics of In Situ Epoxidation of Vegetable Oils; Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 2008, 110, 341-346 (Wiley-VCH GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).
Corrigan, Brian Oil purification, filtration and reclamation, Iron Age (1947) 159(14).
Danisco, Grindsted Soft-n-Safe brochure pp. 1-8, 2007/2008.
Du G., et al., Catalytic Epoxidation of Methyl Linoleate, JAOCS, vol. 81, No. 4 (2004).
Freedman, F., Butterfield, R., and Pryde, E.H. Transesterification Kinetics of Soybean Oil. JAOCS, 63(10) p. 1375 (1986).
Gan, L. H., et al (1994) Epozidized esters of palm olein as plasticizers for poly (vinyl chloride). European Polymer Journal, 31(8), 719-724.
Greenspan, F. P. et al (1953) Epoxy fatty acid ester plasticizers. Indstrial and Engineering Chemistry, 445(12), 2722-2726.
Greenspan, F.P. et al (1956), Epoxy fatty acid ester plasticizers. Preparartion and properties, The Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 33, 391-394.
Grummitt O. and Fleming H. Acetylated Castor Oil Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 37, No. 5, May 1945, pp. 485-491.
Haas, Michael J. Improving the Economics of biodiesel production through the use of low value lipids as feedstocks: vegetable oil soapstock, Fuel Processing Technology 86 p. 1087-96 (2005).
Jensen, R.G. Purification of Triglycerides with an Aluminca Column, Lipids, 451-452 (1966).
Morgenstern, B. “Epoxidized Fatty Acid Esters as Plasticizers for PVC” dated Apr. 22, 2005.
Morgenstern, B. Epoxidized Fatty Acid Esters as Plasticizers for PVC, presented at the 7th Freiberg Polymer Conference, Apr. 21 and 22, 2005.
Morgenstern, B. Use of Modified Fatty Acid Esters as Plasticizers for PVC, dated Sep. 12, 2003.
Opposition to patent EP2245089, Dated Jan. 9, 2013.
Orellana-Coca et al., Lipase Mediated Simultaneious Esterification and Epoxidation of Oleic Acid for the Production of Alkylepoxystearates. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 44 (2007) 133-137.
Stuart, A et al., Polym. Bull. (2010) 65:589-598.
Rehberg, C. et. Al. Plasticizers from Lactic Esters and Biabasic Acids Ind. Eng. Chem., 1952, 44 (9), pp. 2191-2195.
Santacesaria E. et al.; A Biphasic Model Describing Soybean Oil Epoxidation with H2O2 in a Fed-Batch Reactor; Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 173, Issue 1, Sep. 1, 2011, pp. 198-209 (Elsevier B.V.).
Sen{hacek over (z)}ana S. et al.; Kinetics of In Situ Epoxidation of Soybean Oil in Bulk Catalyzed by Ion Exchange Resin; Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 78, No. 7 (2001) 725-731 (AOCS Press).
Sheehan, J et al. “A Look Back at the U.S. Department of Energy's Aquatic Species Program: Biodiesel from Algae”, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, Jul. 1998, pp. 1-294.
Taylor, D. R. Proceedings of the World Conference on oilseed technology and utilization, Adsorptive Purification, American Oil Chemists Society, Champaing, 1992, p. 152-165.
Tekin A., and Hammond E. Factors Affecting the Electrical Resistivity of Soybean Oil, JAOCS, vol. 75(6) 1998.
XP002657062 Vertellus Performance Materials Inc.; Flexricin P-8 Technical Data Sheet, Nov. 2006.
XP002669860, Thomson Scientific, Mar. 13, 2009, London, GB.
PCT/ US2009/033935, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Aug. 26, 2010.
PCT/US2009/033935 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 18, 2009.
PCT/US2010/050654 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 9, 2010.
PCT/US2010/050676 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 12, 2011.
PCT/US2010/050690 International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 12, 2012.
PCT/US2010/050690 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 2, 2011.
PCT/US2011/035143 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 26, 2011.
PCT/US2011/041557 International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Aug. 31, 2012.
PCT/US2011/041557 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 5, 2011.
PCT/US2011/045653 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 7, 2011.
PCT/US2012/043740 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 23, 2013.
PCT/US2012/055070 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 3, 2012.
PCT/US2013/023362 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 28, 2013.
PCT/US2013/023362, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Aug. 12, 2014.
PCT/ US2009/033935, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated May 27, 2009.
PCT/ US2009/033935, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated May 18, 2009.
PCT/US2010/050654 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 12, 2010.
PCT/US2010/050690 International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 1, 2012.
PCT/US2010/050690 International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 24, 2012.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170088695 A1 Mar 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61596432 Feb 2012 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14370883 US
Child 15335532 US