This application claims priority from European Patent Application No. EP09008867.5, filed Jul. 7, 2009, the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates to a plate for the treatment of bone fractures.
2. Description of the Related Art
To aid the treatment and healing process of fractured bones, it is known to use plates, screws, pins and wire cerclages as internal fixation means. For complicated fractures the bone and the bone fragments have to be fixated securely by use of plates. However, a stiff plate increases the risk of mal-union or non-union due to the stress-shielding effect.
To reduce the risk of mal-union or non-union due to the stress-shielding effect, one has to reduce the stiffness of the plate. However, this reduces the strength of the plate and in some cases can lead to fatigue failure of the plate. Thus a plate for the treatment of bone fractures with an ideal ratio between the strength and the stiffness of the metal plate is desired. In addition to other advantageous properties, the subject matter described in the claims can also satisfy these demands.
The plate for the treatment of bone fractures has a first surface and a second surface. The second surface is opposed to the first surface and is adapted and suited to face a bone surface, with at least one of the first and second surfaces defining at least one generally linearly shaped portion of a boundary of at least one cross section of the plate.
Conventional plates used in osteosynthesis typically have a cross-section formed by two concentric radii. In contrast to this cross-section, the plate of the present disclosure has an increased strength and a lower stiffness for a given thickness and width as compared to a conventional circle segmented design. The increased strength has the advantage that it reduces the probability of fatigue failure of the plate, and the reduced stiffness advantageously reduces the risk of mal-union or non-union due to the stress-shielding effect. The fact that the second surface is adapted and suited to facing the surface of the bone at the fracture site enables a more secure fixation of the plate at the fracture site. Moreover, the manufacturing process is improved, as the conventional cross-section having two concentric radii is more costly and work intensive.
In a further aspect, the boundary of the cross section of the plate defines the longer sides of a rectangle within which the boundary of the cross section is inscribed, the second surface defining a non-linearly shaped middle portion which lies inside the rectangle and which is positioned between two generally linearly shaped lateral portions forming a part of one of the longer sides of the rectangle, and the first surface defining a middle portion which forms a part of the other longer side of the rectangle and which is positioned between two lateral portions lying inside the rectangle.
This is particularly advantageous in practice, as a rectangular cross-section has an increased strength and lower stiffness for the same thickness and width as a conventional circle segmented design. This reduces the probability of fatigue failure of the plate and reduces the risk of mal-union or non-union. Also, using a rectangular bar as raw material further reduces the cost of manufacture of the bone fracture plate.
In an aspect of the plate for the treatment of bone fractures, the plate defines a plane and the at least one generally linearly shaped portion is parallel to this plane. Advantageously, the plate can be manufactured from a section of raw material, either in a press or in other suitable machines, reducing the cost of manufacture of the plate.
In a further aspect, the plate has at least one generally linearly shaped portion which is adjacent to at least one non-linearly shaped portion. This is particularly advantageous during the fixation of the plate to the bone, as a flat surface is more firmly held in place, such as by tools, as compared to a non-flat surface.
In another aspect of the plate, the non-linearly shaped portion defines a generally concave or a generally convex part of the boundary of the cross section. This is particularly advantageous, as a generally convex or generally concave non-linearly shaped portion can be easily manufactured by providing either a convex cut out in a generally rectangular bar or by cutting concave parts from a rectangular bar of raw material.
In a further aspect, the non-linearly shaped portion is curved, and in particular has the shape of a circular arc. This is particularly advantageous during the manufacture of the plate, as most cutting and forming tools are adapted to produce circular surfaces and/or cut outs. Moreover, curved surfaces are particularly advantageous as they help to prevent the tissue surrounding the bone at the fracture site from being damaged which shortens the healing time and increases the well being of the patient after surgery.
In an even further aspect of the plate for the treatment of bone fractures, the non-linearly shaped middle portion which is defined by the second surface is adapted to be matched to a contour of the bone surface. This has the advantage that the placement of the second surface onto the bone surface during surgery is enhanced and therefore provides improved attachment of the plate to the bone surface.
In a further aspect of the present disclosure, the first surface of the plate is of generally convex shape. This advantageously provides the plate of the present disclosure with sufficient thickness and, therefore, with sufficient strength.
In a further aspect of the plate of the present disclosure, the first surface defines a generally linearly shaped middle portion. During surgery this has the advantage that it facilitates the use of tools to hold the plate in situ during surgery to improve the attachment of the plate to the bone surface.
In a further aspect of the plate for the treatment of bone fractures, the generally linearly shaped middle portion defined by the first surface is essentially parallel to the generally linearly shaped lateral portions of the second surface. This is particularly advantageous as this leads to an increased strength for a reduction in stiffness, and prevents fatigue failure of the plate used in osteosynthetic surgical procedures. Moreover, the tools used to attach the plate to the bone surface are easier to use, thereby improving the attachment of the plate to the bone and consequently improving the healing process and comfort of the patient during the same.
In a further aspect of the plate, the lateral portions defined by the first surface are curved or generally linearly shaped in the cross section of the plate. These curved or generally linearly shaped portions are easy to manufacture, and they help prevent damage to the tissue at the site of the bone plate.
In a further aspect, the plate has an elongated shape defining a longitudinal extent. Moreover, the cross section of the plate is generally perpendicular to the longitudinal extent. Thus the cross section of the plate is generally perpendicular to the bone surface at every point along the length of the plate. This is particularly useful, as the cross-section of a bone can vary significantly along the longitudinal length of the bone and has a generally bigger cross-section at the end of the bone compared to the generally thinner cross-section of the central part of the bone, thus the generally non-planar shaped middle part of the plate can have different sized cross-sections along the length of the bone.
In a further aspect of the plate, along the longitudinal extent at substantially every cross section of the plate, at least one of the first and second surfaces defines at least one generally linearly shaped portion. Thus, the generally rectangular cross section of the plate is maintained for substantially every section of the plate.
In a further aspect of the present disclosure, the longitudinal extent of the plate is non-linear. This is particularly advantageous if the bone to be fixed is not straight but curved. Moreover, as the cross-section of a bone varies significantly along the longitudinal length of the bone and has a generally bigger cross-section at the end of the bone compared to the generally thinner cross-section of the central part of the bone, the generally non-linearly shaped longitudinal extent of the plate can have different sized cross-sections along the length of the bone. This is advantageously achieved by having a bone plate which extends non-linearly along the surface of the bone.
In a further aspect of the present disclosure at least one hole for a bone screw is provided in the plate extending between the first surface and the second surface, with the bone screw being adapted for fixing the plate to the bone. This leads to an improved attachment means for the bone plate to the bone, and depending on the size of the fracture, and/or the number of fractured bone segments aids the healing process advantageously.
The different aspects described above of the plate in accordance with the independent claim and the features realized there can naturally be combined with one another.
Further aspects of the disclosure are also recited in the dependent claims, the description and the drawings.
Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples are intended for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure in any way.
The present disclosure will be explained in more detail and become fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein
The following description of the embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the disclosure, its application, or uses.
In the following the same reference numerals are used for like features, such as features that are either similar in design or fulfill the same technical function.
Referring to
As best seen in
Referring generally to
Referring now to
Turning now to
Referring to
Referring still to
Returning to
Top surface 2 has overall width Z in head portion 42, with linear portion 16′ defining a linear portion width Z′ in head portion 42 as shown in
Referring now to
Top surface 2 has overall width C in tail portion 40, with linear portion 16′ defining a linear portion width C′ in tail portion 40 as shown in
Moreover, because widths C′, Z′ of linear portion 16′ vary depending on the particular chosen cross-section of plate 10, linear portion 16′ may also be described as covering a portion of the total area of top surface 2 in both tail portion 40 and head portion 42. The area of coverage of linear portion 16′ in tail portion 40, expressed as a percentage of the overall area of top surface 2 in tail portion 40, may form as little as 8%, 12% or 16% and as much as 24%, 28% or 32%, or within any range defined by any of the foregoing values. In the illustrated embodiment of
Referring still to
Referring now to
Plate 10 of
In this respect it should be noted, that the width of plate 10 is defined by the separation between the centers of side walls 22, 24 of plate 10, and that the width of plate 10 is also adapted to correspond with the contour of bone surface 6. It should also be noted that side walls 22, 24 need not necessarily be perpendicular to the generally planar outer sections 8 or the generally linearly shaped middle portions 16, nor do side walls 22, 24 have to be linear in shape, but can also be convex or concave. However, the fact that the generally linearly shaped middle portion 16 and the generally linearly shaped lateral portions 8 are parallel to one another still permit the bone healing plate 10 of the present disclosure to be described as having a generally rectangular cross-section, with the generally linearly shaped lateral portions 8 and the generally linearly shaped middle portion 16 forming parts of the longer sides of the rectangle 38.
Moreover, a length of plate 10 can be defined by the separation between the geometric centers of end walls 26, 28 (see
The cross-section of plate 10 shown in
The width of plate 10 is approximately 2 to 20 times larger than the diameter of hole 14, and the thickness of plate 10 is approximately ½ to 18 times the diameter of hole 14. The material of plate 10 can be any material typically used in osteosynthetic surgical procedures and be selected from the group including titanium, surgical steel, surgical synthetic materials, composite synthetic polymeric materials or even biodegradable surgical materials.
As can be seen in
If one were to make several sectional illustrations along the longitudinal extent of plate 10, then in many of the sectional illustrations, such as the majority or substantially every sectional illustration, at least one of first and second surfaces 2, 4 would define at least one generally linearly shaped portion 8, 16. This does not exclude the existence of cross sections perpendicular to the longitudinal extent in which—due to the specific design of the plate—neither of the first or second surfaces 2, 4 have a generally linearly shaped portion 8, 16 at a portion of the plate, for example, in the region of holes 14.
As can be seen in
In the embodiment illustrated in
Plate 10 of
The non-linearly shaped portion 12 is a generally convex part of the boundary of the cross section of plate 10, and the non-linearly shaped parts 32 are generally concave parts of the boundary. As can be seen from rectangle 38 of
If required, a plurality of grooves may be provided along the generally non-linearly shaped middle portion 12 of
The structure of the surface of the generally non-linearly shaped middle portion 12 can include any type of geometry which is beneficial for the healing process of the bone.
Furthermore, non-linearly shaped portions 12, 32 can be of any geometric shape, i.e. a straight line, a curve, a saw tooth shaped portion etc. It should be noted, however, that this geometric shape does not lie in the same plane as the linearly shaped portions, but rather intersects this plane.
Moreover, the point of transition between linearly shaped middle portion 16 of the first surface 2 and each of the two lateral portions 32 (non-linearly shaped portions 32) can be defined by a change of the radius of curvature or by a change of the gradient (slope) of first surface 2. Should lateral portions 32 be substantially straight lines intersecting the substantially straight line of middle portion 16, then there is a kink at the point where the two lines meet.
One could consider providing the surface of linearly middle portion 16 with a slight curve, with lateral portions 32 then also being curved but having a different radius of curvature, hence a change of the radius occurs at the transition between the two curved portions.
The description of the disclosure is merely exemplary in nature, and, thus, variations do not depart in the gist of the disclosure are intended to be within the scope of the disclosure. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit in the scope of the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09008867 | Jul 2009 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4429690 | Angelino-Pievani | Feb 1984 | A |
4524765 | de Zbikowski | Jun 1985 | A |
4549540 | Caspari et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4573458 | Lower | Mar 1986 | A |
4776330 | Chapman et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4838252 | Klaue | Jun 1989 | A |
4867144 | Karas et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4903691 | Heinl | Feb 1990 | A |
4905679 | Morgan | Mar 1990 | A |
4913413 | Raab | Apr 1990 | A |
5002544 | Klaue et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006120 | Carter | Apr 1991 | A |
5015248 | Burstein et al. | May 1991 | A |
5041114 | Chapman et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053036 | Perren et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5151103 | Tepic et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5364398 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5403319 | Matsen, III et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5437672 | Alleyne | Aug 1995 | A |
5462547 | Weigum | Oct 1995 | A |
5601553 | Trebing et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5709686 | Talos et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718705 | Sammarco | Feb 1998 | A |
5772662 | Chapman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5807396 | Raveh | Sep 1998 | A |
5810823 | Klaue et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
D402032 | Stone | Dec 1998 | S |
5871018 | Delp et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5938664 | Winquist et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6093201 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096040 | Esser | Aug 2000 | A |
D443060 | Benirschke et al. | May 2001 | S |
6283969 | Grusin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309393 | Tepic et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6348052 | Sammarco | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364882 | Orbay | Apr 2002 | B1 |
D458374 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
D458683 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
D458684 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
D458996 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
D463557 | Bryant et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
D463558 | Bryant et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
D463559 | Bryant et al. | Sep 2002 | S |
6454770 | Klaue | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D464136 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
D464731 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
D469532 | Bryant et al. | Jan 2003 | S |
D469533 | Bryant et al. | Jan 2003 | S |
D469534 | Bryant et al. | Jan 2003 | S |
6506191 | Joos | Jan 2003 | B1 |
D469874 | Bryant et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D469875 | Bryant et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D470588 | Bryant et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D479331 | Pike et al. | Sep 2003 | S |
6623486 | Weaver et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645208 | Apfelbaum et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6712820 | Orbay | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6755832 | Happonen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786909 | Dransfeld et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6821278 | Frigg et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6866665 | Orbay | Mar 2005 | B2 |
D505205 | Freid | May 2005 | S |
6890335 | Grabowski et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
D520637 | Kay et al. | May 2006 | S |
7052499 | Steger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7128744 | Weaver et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D536453 | Young et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
7318825 | Butler et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7341589 | Weaver et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D576731 | Strnad et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
D580056 | Orthner | Nov 2008 | S |
D580057 | Ramadani | Nov 2008 | S |
7479143 | Suh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
D594123 | Haidukewych et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
7648508 | Lutz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8246664 | Terrill et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20020188296 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030130665 | Pinczewski et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040097937 | Pike et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102775 | Huebner | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111183 | Sutherland | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116930 | O'Driscoll et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153073 | Orbay | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040220572 | Michelson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225291 | Schwammberger et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050049595 | Suh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090825 | Pfefferle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060173458 | Forstein et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217722 | Dutoit et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235402 | Celli et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241607 | Myerson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070055253 | Orbay et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070239163 | Strnad et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270853 | Leung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080021477 | Strnad et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051786 | Jensen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080132960 | Weaver et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183172 | Fritzinger | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200955 | Tepic | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234676 | Schulze et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300637 | Austin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018587 | Bottlang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024171 | Leone | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090318920 | Jacobs | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100234896 | Lorenz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8213228 | Aug 1982 | DE |
8628766 | Dec 1986 | DE |
0515828 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0934731 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1477124 | Nov 2004 | EP |
2405062 | May 1979 | FR |
2405706 | May 1979 | FR |
2517536 | Jun 1983 | FR |
2517536 | Jun 1983 | FR |
11299804 | Nov 1999 | JP |
WO9938448 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO2004089233 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005122916 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2007006430 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007138062 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007137437 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007138062 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008019511 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2009009521 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2011004266 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/EP2005/052751. |
International Preliminary Examination Report issued Oct. 6, 2006 in International Application No. PCT/EP2005/052751. |
Kienzle et al. “Total Knee Replacement” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, New York, vol. 14, No. 3, May 1, 1995, pp. 301-306. |
Intrauma, Periprosthetics, Product Brochure, Feb. 2010. |
LaPlaque Femoral Anatomique, Lefevre et al., Maitrise Orthopedique No. 164, May 2007. |
Synthes DHS/DCS System Including LCP DHS and DHS Blade, Technique Guide, Synthes 2007. |
Synthes Distal Femur Plates. Shape Based on Distal Femur LISS Plate Design, Product Brochure, Synthes Inc. 2007. |
Synthes Locking Attachment Plate. For Treatment of Periprosthetic Fractures, Technique Guide, Synthes Inc. Dec. 2009. |
Synthes Locking Compression Plate (LCP) System. Locking Screw Technology and Conventional Plating in one System, Product Brochure, Synthes Inc. 2003. |
Synthes Trochanter Stabilization Plate for DHS, Technique Guide, Synthes USA 2000. |
Synthes Universal Locking Trochanter Stabilization Plate (ULTSP). For Use with the DHS/DCS and LCP DHHS Systems, Technique Guide, Synthes Inc. 2007. |
Product Brochure—Zimmer NCB Plating System, A locking plate system that expands a surgeon's options in trauma surgery, 97-2370-001-00 5 ML, 2006 Zimmer, Inc. |
Surgical Technique—Zimmer NCB Distal Femoral Plating System, The right locking option for tough fractures. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/001995, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 10, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/001995, International Search Report mailed Nov. 5, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/IB2010/001995, Written Opinion mailed Nov. 5, 2010”, 4 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110004252 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |