This invention relates to the field of data security. In particular, the invention relates to a platform and method that protects an identity of the platform through creation and use of pseudonyms.
Advances in technology have opened up many opportunities for applications that go beyond the traditional ways of doing business. Electronic commerce (e-commerce) and business-to-business (B2B) transactions are now becoming popular, reaching the global markets at a fast rate. Unfortunately, while electronic platforms like computers provide users with convenient and efficient methods of doing business, communicating and transacting, they are also vulnerable for unscrupulous attacks. This vulnerability has substantially hindered the willingness of content providers from providing their content in a downloaded, digital format.
Currently, various mechanisms have been proposed to verify the identity of a platform. This is especially useful to determine if the platform features a “trusted” device; namely, the device is configured to prevent digital content from being copied in a non-encrypted format without authorization. One verification scheme involves the use of a unique serial number assigned to a platform for identification of that platform. Another verification scheme, performed either independently from or cooperatively with the previously described verification scheme, involves the use of a permanent key pair. The permanent key pair includes (i) a unique public key that identifies the platform and (ii) a private key that is permanently stored in memory of the trusted device. The private key is confidential and is not provided outside the trusted device. However, these verification schemes pose a number of disadvantages.
For example, each of these verification schemes is still subject to data aggregation attacks. “Data aggregation” involves the collection and analysis of data transmitted from a platform over a period of time. Thus, the use of platform serial numbers and permanent keys for identification purposes has recently lead to consumer privacy concerns. Also, for both verification mechanisms, a user cannot easily and reliably control access to and use of the platform identity on a per-use basis.
The features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the present invention in which:
The present invention relates to a platform and method for protecting the identity of the platform through the creation and use of pseudonyms. Herein, certain details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It is apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art, however, that the present invention may be practiced through many embodiments other that those illustrated. Well-known circuits and cryptographic techniques are not set forth in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
In the following description, terminology is used to discuss certain features of the present invention. For example, a “platform” includes hardware and/or software that process information. Examples of a platform include, but are not limited or restricted to any of the following: a computer (e.g., desktop, a laptop, a hand-held, a server, a workstation, etc.); data transmission equipment (e.g., a router, switch, facsimile machine, etc.), wireless equipment (e.g., cellular base station, telephone handset, etc.); or television set-top box. “Software” includes code that, when executed, performs a certain function. “Information” is defined as one or more bits of data, address, and/or control.
With respect to cryptographic functionality, a “cryptographic operation” is an operation performed for additional security on information. These operations may include encryption, decryption, hash computations, and the like. In certain cases, the cryptographic operation requires the use of a key, which is a series of bits. For asymmetric key cryptography, a device is associated with unique, permanent key pair that includes a public key and a private key.
In addition, asymmetric key cryptography normally utilizes a root certificate. A “root certificate” is a public key at the origination of a digital certificate chain and provides a starting point for all subsequent digital certificates. In general, a “digital certificate” includes information used to authenticate a sender of information. For example, in accordance with CCITT Recommendation X.509: The Directory—Authentication Framework (1988), a digital certificate may include information (e.g., a key) concerning a person or entity being certified, namely encrypted using the private key of a certification authority. Examples of a “certification authority” include an original equipment manufacturer (OEM), a software vendor, a trade association, a governmental entity, a bank or any other trusted business or person. A “digital certificate chain” includes an ordered sequence of two or more digital certificates arranged for authorization purposes as described below, where each successive certificate represents the issuer of the preceding certificate.
A “digital signature” includes digital information signed with a private key of its signatory to ensure that the digital information has not been illicitly modified after being digitally signed. This digital information may be provided in its entirety or as a hash value produced by a one-way hash operation.
A “hash operation” is a one-way conversion of information to a fixed-length representation referred to as a “hash value”. Often, the hash value is substantially less in size than the original information. It is contemplated that, in some cases, a 1:1 conversion of the original information may be performed. The term “one-way” indicates that there does not readily exist an inverse function to recover any discernible portion of the original information from the fixed-length hash value. Examples of a hash function include MD5 provided by RSA Data Security of Redwood City, Calif., or Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA-1) as specified a 1995 publication Secure Hash Standard FIPS 180-1 entitled “Federal Information Processing Standards Publication” (Apr. 17, 1995).
Referring to
Referring now to
Herein, device 150 comprises a processing unit 200 and a persistent memory 210 (e.g., non-volatile, battery-backed random access memory “RAM”, etc.). Processing unit 200 is hardware that is controlled by software that internally processes information. For example, processing unit 200 can perform hash operations, perform logical operations (e.g. multiplication, division, etc.), and/or produce a digital signature by digitally signing information using the Digital Signature Algorithm. Persistent memory 210 contains a unique asymmetric key pair 220 programmed during manufacture. Used for certifying pseudonyms, asymmetric key pair 220 includes a public key (PUKP1) 230 and a private key (PRKP1) 240. Persistent memory 210 may further include a public key 250 (PUKP2) of second platform 120, although it may be placed in volatile memory (e.g., RAM, register set, etc.) within device 150 if applicable.
In this embodiment, device 150 further comprises a number generator 260 such as a random number generator or a pseudo-random number generator. Number generator 260 is responsible for generating a bit stream that is used, at least in part, to produce one or more pseudonyms. A “pseudonym” is an alias identity in the form of an alternate key pair used to establish protected communications with another platform and to identify that its platform includes trusted device 150. The pseudonym also supports a challenge/response protocol and a binding of licensing, secrets and other access control information to the specific platform. It is contemplated, however, that number generator 260 may be employed externally from device 150. In that event, the greater security would be realized by platform 110 if communications between number generator 260 and device 150 were protected.
Referring to
Once a pseudonym has been produced and allocated for use in communications with a remote platform, this pseudonym represents the persistent platform identity for that platform/platform communications, so long as the user chooses to retain the pseudonym (blocks 340, 350 and 360).
Referring now to
Thereafter, the certificate hash value undergoes a transformation similar to that described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,759,063 and 4,759,064 to create a “blinded”certificate hash value (block 415). In particular, the certificate hash value is multiplied by a pseudo-random number (e.g., a predetermined number raised to a power that is pseudo-randomly select). The pseudo-random power is maintained in confidence within the first platform (e.g., placed in persistent memory 210 of
A certification request, including at least the transformed (or blinded) certificate hash value, is created (block 420). The certification request is digitally signed with the private key (PRKP1) of the first platform (block 425). A device certificate, namely a digital certificate chain that includes the public key (PUKP1) of the first platform in one embodiment, is retrieved or generated to accompany the signed certificate request (block 430). In this embodiment, the device certificate features a high-level certificate including PUKP1 and a lowest level certificate including the root certificate. Of course, the device certificate may be a single digital certificate including PUKP1. Both the signed certificate request and device certificate are encrypted with the public key (PUKP2) of the second platform and then transferred to the second platform (blocks 435 and 440).
At the second platform, the signed certificate request and device certificate are recovered after being decrypted using the private key (PRKP2) of the second platform (block 445). The public key (PUKP1) of the first platform may be obtained using a public key of the certification authority responsible for signing the device certificate (block 450). If the second platform can recover the certificate request, the second platform verifies the device certificate back to the root certificate (blocks 455 and 460). If the certificate request is recovered and the device certificate is verified, the transformed (or blinded) certificate hash value is digitally signed to produce a “signed result” (block 465). Otherwise, if either the transformed (or blinded) certificate hash value cannot be determined or the device certificate cannot be verified, an error message is returned to the first platform (block 470).
Upon receipt of the signed result from the second platform, the first platform performs an inverse transformation on the signal result. For example, in this illustrative embodiment, the first platform divides the signed result by an inverse of the pseudo-random number (e.g., the predetermined number raised to an inverse of the pseudo-random power) to recover a digital signature of the certificate hash value (blocks 475 and 480). The digital signature is stored with one or more pseudonyms for use in subsequent communications with other platforms to identify that the first platform includes a trusted device.
While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, which are apparent to persons skilled in the art to which the invention pertains are deemed to lie within the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/605,605, filed Jun. 28, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,162.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3699532 | Schaffer et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3996449 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4037214 | Birney et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4162536 | Morley | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4207609 | Luiz et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4247905 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4276594 | Morley | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4278837 | Best | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4307447 | Provanzano et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4319323 | Ermolovich et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4347565 | Kaneda et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4366537 | Heller et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4403283 | Myntti et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4419724 | Branigin et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4430709 | Schleupen et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4521852 | Guttag | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4571672 | Hatada et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4621318 | Maeda | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4759063 | Chaum | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4759064 | Chaum | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4795893 | Ugon | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4802084 | Ikegaya et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4825052 | Chemin et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4907270 | Hazard | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4907272 | Hazard | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4910774 | Barakat | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4975836 | Hirosawa et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5007082 | Cummins | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5022077 | Bealkowski et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5075842 | Lai | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5079737 | Hackbarth | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5187802 | Inoue et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5230069 | Brelsford et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5237616 | Abraham et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5255379 | Melo | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5287363 | Wolf et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5293424 | Hotley et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295251 | Wakui et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5317705 | Gannon et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5319760 | Mason et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5361375 | Ogi | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5386552 | Garney | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5421006 | Jablon et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5434999 | Goire et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437033 | Inoue et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5442645 | Ugon et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5455909 | Blomgren et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459867 | Adams et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459869 | Spilo | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5469557 | Salt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5473692 | Davis | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5479509 | Ugon | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5504922 | Seki et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5506975 | Onodera | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511121 | Yacobi | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511217 | Nakajima et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5522075 | Robinson et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5528231 | Patarin | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5533126 | Hazard | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5555385 | Osisek | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5555414 | Hough et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5560013 | Scalzi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5564040 | Kubala | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5566323 | Ugon | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568552 | Davis | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574936 | Ryba et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5582717 | Di Santo | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5604805 | Brands | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5606617 | Brands | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5615263 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5628022 | Ueno et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633929 | Kaliski, Jr. | May 1997 | A |
| 5657445 | Pearce | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5668971 | Neufeld | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5684948 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5706469 | Kobayashi | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5717903 | Bonola | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720609 | Pfefferle | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721222 | Bernstein et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5729760 | Poisner | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5737604 | Miller et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5737760 | Grimmer, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740178 | Jacks et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5752046 | Oprescu et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5757919 | Herbert et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5764969 | Kahle et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5796835 | Saada | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796845 | Serikawa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5805712 | Davis | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809546 | Greenstein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5825875 | Ugon | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825880 | Sudia et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835594 | Albrecht et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5844986 | Davis | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852717 | Bhide et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854913 | Goetz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867577 | Patarin | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872844 | Yacobi | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872994 | Akiyama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878138 | Yacobi | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5890189 | Nozue et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5900606 | Rigal | May 1999 | A |
| 5901225 | Ireton et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5903752 | Dingwall et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5919257 | Trostle | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5935242 | Madany et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935247 | Pai et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5937063 | Davis | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944821 | Angelo | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5953502 | Helbig, Sr. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956408 | Arnold | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970147 | Davis | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978475 | Schneier et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5978481 | Ganesan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987557 | Ebrahim | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6014745 | Ashe | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6035374 | Panwar et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044478 | Green | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052467 | Brands | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055637 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058478 | Davis | May 2000 | A |
| 6061794 | Angelo | May 2000 | A |
| 6075938 | Bugnion et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085296 | Karkhanis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6088262 | Nasu | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6092095 | Maytal | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093213 | Favor et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6101584 | Satou et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108644 | Goldschlag et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115816 | Davis | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6125430 | Noel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6131166 | Wong-Insley | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6148379 | Schimmel | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158546 | Hanson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6173417 | Merrill | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6175924 | Arnold | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6175925 | Nardone et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178509 | Nardone | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182089 | Ganapathy et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6188257 | Buer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192455 | Bogin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199152 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6205550 | Nardone et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212635 | Reardon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222923 | Schwenk | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6249872 | Wildgrube et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252650 | Nakaumra | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6269392 | Cotichini et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272533 | Browne et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6272637 | Little et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6275933 | Fine et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282650 | Davis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282651 | Ashe | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282657 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6292874 | Barnett | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6301646 | Hostetter | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308270 | Guthery et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6314409 | Schneck et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
| 6321314 | Van Dyke | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327652 | England et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330670 | England et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6339815 | Feng | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6339816 | Bausch | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6357004 | Davis | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363485 | Adams | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6374286 | Gee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374317 | Ajanovic et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378068 | Foster | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378072 | Collins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389537 | Davis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397242 | Devine et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397379 | Yates, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6412035 | Webber | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6421702 | Gulick | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6435416 | Slassi | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445797 | McGough et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6463535 | Drews et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6463537 | Tello | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6499123 | McFarland et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505279 | Phillips et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507904 | Ellison et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6526509 | Horn et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529909 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535988 | Poisner | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6557104 | Vu et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6560627 | McDonald et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6609199 | DeTreville | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6615278 | Curtis | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633963 | Ellison et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6633981 | Davis | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6651171 | England et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6678825 | Ellison et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6684326 | Cromer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6871276 | Simon | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 7023994 | Dupre | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 20010021969 | Burger et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027511 | Wakabayashi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027527 | Khidekel et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037450 | Metlitski et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020007456 | Peinado et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020023032 | Pearson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147916 | Strongin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166061 | Falik et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169717 | Challener | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030018892 | Tello | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074548 | Cromer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115453 | Grawrock | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126442 | Glew et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126453 | Glew et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030159056 | Cromer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188179 | Challener et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196085 | Lampson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040117539 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266523 | Gentles et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050066164 | Simon | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4217444 | Dec 1992 | DE |
| 0473913 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 0600112 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0602867 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0755136 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 0892521 | Jan 1999 | EP |
| 0930567 | Jul 1999 | EP |
| 0961193 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 0965902 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1030237 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1055989 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1056014 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1085396 | Mar 2001 | EP |
| 1146715 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1209563 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1271277 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 2000076139 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| WO9524696 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO9729567 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO9812620 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO9834365 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO9844402 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9908466 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO9905600 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO9909482 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO9918511 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| 0021238 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO0062232 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO0127723 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO0127821 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO0163994 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO0175564 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO0175565 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO0175595 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO0201794 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO0217555 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO02060121 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO02086684 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO03058412 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060080528 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09605605 | Jun 2000 | US |
| Child | 11289747 | US |