This disclosure relates to a turbine blade rotor assembly. In particular, the disclosure relates to an assembly for which a platform adjacent to the turbine blade is provided by a separate structure.
Typical turbine blades for a gas turbine engine are constructed from a nickel alloy. Multiple turbine blades are arranged circumferentially about a rotor and secured thereto by their roots. Typically, turbine blades include integral platforms extending circumferentially from both the high and low pressure sides of the airfoil near the root. The platforms act as flow guides that divert airflow along a desired flow path.
It is desirable to increase turbine rotor speed to improve the performance and efficiency of gas turbine engines. The turbine rotor speed is limited by the loads on the turbine blades. In particular, the turbine blades, which are typically constructed from nickel alloy, speed can be limited by the attached platforms, which curl and crack under loads.
In an effort to reduce turbine blade cooling flows, it has been suggested that turbine blades could be constructed from a ceramic matrix composite (CMC). This design approach endeavored to eliminate the use of nickel in the turbine blade and substitute a high temperature CMC. The layered construction of the CMC blade favors a direct connection between the attachment feature and the airfoil itself. To simplify the construction, the platforms are provided by separate structure that is secured to the rotor because providing an integral platform to a CMC blade is very difficult.
The current state of the art cooling schemes for nickel alloy blade have improved the thermal capability such that alternative material such as CMC may not offer significant benefits. However, the problem of blade platform capability remains. Thus, it is desirable to utilize a nickel alloy blade that does not have platforms that crack at increased turbine rotor speeds.
A turbine blade rotor assembly is disclosed for a gas turbine engine. The assembly includes a rotor having nickel alloy turbine blades secured thereto. Each of the blades includes a root and an airfoil. The roots are supported by the rotor. A ceramic matrix composite platform separate from the turbine blades is supported between each pair of the turbine blades adjacent to the airfoils. In one example, the airfoil includes a perimeter. A shroud having an aperture receives the airfoil with a single shroud substantially surrounding the airfoil at the perimeter. In one example, the turbine blade includes high and low pressure sides opposite one another that extend from a tip to a root. The airfoil is free from any protrusions extending from the high and low pressure sides on a portion of the blade axially outward from the root.
These and other features of the disclosure can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
An example turbine blade rotor assembly 10 is shown in
The airfoil 20 includes pressure and suction sides 22, 24 that extend between leading and trailing edges 26, 28. The airfoil 20 includes a perimeter 30 about which one or more platforms 34 are arranged to direct airflow in a desired path. The platforms 34 are constructed from a ceramic material, such as a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) or a monolithic ceramic. The platforms 34 include a base 36 that is secured to the rotor 12. In the example shown in
In the example shown in
Referring to
A cross-section of various platforms are shown in
Another example arrangement between the protrusions 70 and platform 536 is shown in
Referring to
Although example embodiments have been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine their true scope and content.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3694104 | Erwin | Sep 1972 | A |
4501053 | Craig et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
5030063 | Berger | Jul 1991 | A |
5240377 | Farr | Aug 1993 | A |
5310317 | Bailey et al. | May 1994 | A |
6190131 | Deallenbach | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6478539 | Trutschel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6951447 | Cherolis et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7007382 | Mantel | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7094021 | Haubert | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7255536 | Cunha et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261518 | Golinkin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7874804 | Brown | Jan 2011 | B1 |
20070020102 | Beeck et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070041838 | Charbonneau et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070148000 | Marusko et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070189901 | Dundas et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196693 | Steibel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/220,291, “Platform Mate Face Contours for Turbine Airfoils”, filed Sep. 6, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090257875 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |