This disclosure relates generally to child care products, and, more particularly, to play gyms and methods of operating the same.
In recent years, portable play yards have become very popular. Portable play yards typically include a frame, a fabric enclosure supported by the frame, and a removable floor board or mat. The frame is largely or completely contained within the fabric enclosure so that there are few if any loose parts when the frame is collapsed or when the frame is erected. When collapsed, the portable play yard typically has a compact form factor to enable easy transport and storage of the play yard. Sometimes, the floor board is wrapped around the collapsed frame to prevent the frame from inadvertently leaving the collapsed state.
Sometimes, these portable play yards are provided with a portable bassinet. The portable bassinet is typically suspended within the top of the play yard by hooking the bassinet to the upper rails of the play yard frame and permitting the bassinet to extend downward into the enclosure of the play yard. With the exception of depth (which is significantly lower, often one-quarter to one half the depth of the play yard enclosure), the bassinet may have substantially the same size as the play yard enclosure (i.e., substantially the same width and length), or may be smaller than the play yard enclosure (e.g., substantially the same width but approximately one-half the length). The bassinet is used with infants. When the bassinet is installed, the play yard enclosure cannot be occupied by a child, although the area below the bassinet may sometimes be used for storage of inanimate objects. When the child grows sufficiently, the bassinet is removed from the play yard and the play yard is used to house the child.
The floor mat of the play yard may be used as the floor of the play yard and/or the bassinet. In examples in which the bassinet has a smaller floor area than the play yard that supports the bassinet, the floor board may be folded (e.g., doubled up) to be used as the floor of the bassinet and fully extended to be used as the floor of the play yard.
Mats for use on a floor with an over-arching play gym have also become popular in recent years. For instance, in a known prior art device, a play gym having two flexible arches for suspending objects such as toys or the like is coupled to the corners of a rectangular mat via snaps or the like. The arches cross and are snapped to one another roughly above the middle of the mat. A small child placed on the mat may be entertained by the suspended objects. Because the play gym's arches are flexible, the suspended objects tend to bounce and move in response to vibrations such as those that might be caused by the child batting his/her hands and/or feet at the objects.
The play yard 14 may be constructed in any manner. For example, it can be constructed like any of the portable play yards sold by such companies as Kolcraft Enterprises, Graco Children's Products, Evenflo, Cosco, etc. The play yard 14 may collapse into a rectangular package, may fold into a generally planar configuration (e.g., by folding in half), and/or may not be foldable. Although shown as a rectangular structure, the play yard 14 may have any other desired shape or configuration (e.g., square, triangular, round, etc.)
Similarly, the bassinet 12 may be constructed in any desired manner and/or shape. For example, the bassinet 12 may be constructed like any of the bassinets sold by such companies as Kolcraft Enterprises, Graco Children's Products, Evenflo, Cosco, etc. For instance, the bassinet 12 may be a framed or frameless bassinet that is removably suspended by hooks, snaps or any other type of fastening technique within the play yard 14. The bassinet 12 may have the same general shape and floor area as the play yard 14 as shown in
As mentioned above, in the illustrated example the floor mat 16 is adapted for use as a floor for the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14. Thus, the floor mat 16 is dimensioned to be positioned within at least one of the bassinet 12 and the play yard 14. Since, in the illustrated example, the play yard 14 and the bassinet 12 are not intended to be in use at the same time, one floor mat 16 is provided for use with both the play yard 14 and the bassinet 12 and, thus, the floor mat 16 is dimensioned to be used with both of those structures. Alternatively, two different floor mats 16 of the same or different size and/or construction may be provided.
As used herein, the terms “floor mat” and “floor board” are equivalent and interchangeable. The floor mat 16 may be implemented in any desired manner. For example, the floor mat 16 may be a completely flexible mat made of foam, cloth, plastic and/or other materials. In the illustrated example, however, the floor mat 16 is at least partially rigid to provide a substantially solid floor for the play yard 14 and/or bassinet 12 and to provide enhanced support for a child disposed on the mat 16. In examples in which the floor mat 16 is at least partially rigid, the floor mat 16 may include a pad secured to one or more boards. The pad and board(s) may be encased in a plastic sleeve as is conventional in portable play yards sold today such as the Travelin Tot play yard sold by Kolcraft Enterprises. If the floor mat 16 includes multiple boards, adjacent boards may be positioned along a seam to facilitate folding of the mat 16 in discrete sections. For example, the floor mat 16 may include four solid boards and be foldable in fourths for wrapping around the collapsed play yard 14 during storage and/or transport. In the illustrated example, the play yard 14 and the bassinet 12 have substantially the same floor space and the floor mat 16 is, thus, inserted into the play yard 14 and the bassinet 12 in substantially the same orientation (e.g., flat without folding). In examples in which the bassinet 12 and the play yard 14 have different sizes and/or shapes, the floor mat 16 may be folded (e.g., in half) for insertion into one or both of the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14.
The floor mat 16 may be removably secured in the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14 by any suitable fasteners. For example, the floor mat 16 may be secured to the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14 by Velcro strips. Alternatively, the floor mat 16 may be held in place by gravity without the benefit of fasteners.
The illustrated play gym 10 includes a hub 20 and four legs 22, although persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that no hub and/or fewer or more than four legs 22 may alternatively be employed. For instance, the play gym 10 may include only one leg that forms an arch over the mat 16, the bassinet 12, and/or the play yard 14 without the benefit of a hub. Alternatively, the play gym 10 may include two or more legs that cross near the center of the mat 16, the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14; again with or without the benefit of a hub. The legs may form crossing arches and the arches may be coupled to one another either directly or through a hub.
In the illustrated example, the legs 22 of the play gym 10 are flexible such that they can be bent into the arched position shown in
In the illustrated example, the legs 22 are pivotably coupled to the hub 20 such that they can be pivoted between a stored position wherein the legs 22 are positioned generally parallel to each other as shown in
To bias the legs 22 toward the hub 20, each of the legs is further provided with a spring 36. As shown in
To define the stored and extended positions of the legs 22, the hub 20 defines a plurality of cavities 40, 44. A first set of the cavities 40 is positioned to prevent the legs 22 from pivoting when the legs 22 are in the stored position. The second set of cavities 44 is positioned to prevent the legs 22 from pivoting when the legs 22 are in the extended position. Thus, each of the legs 22 is associated with a pair of cavities, namely, one of the cavities 40 from the first set and one of the cavities 44 from the second set.
More specifically, each of the cavities 40, 44 is dimensioned to receive an end of a respective one of the legs 22 when the leg 22 is in one of the stored position and the extended position. As discussed above, the springs 36 bias the legs toward the hub 20. This biasing force biases the legs 22 into engagement with respective ones of the cavities 40, 44. When the ends of the legs 22 are positioned in a corresponding cavity 40, 44, the walls of the cavity 40, 44 prevent the legs 22 from pivoting out of the cavity. Thus, when an end of a leg 22 is positioned in its first corresponding cavity 40, the walls of the cavity 40 prevent the leg 22 from pivoting out of the stored position. Similarly, when the end of the leg 22 is positioned in its second corresponding cavity 44, the walls of the cavity 44 prevent the leg from pivoting out of the extended position. As a result, when it is desirable to pivot a leg 22 between the extended and stored positions, a user must pull that leg 22 against the force of the spring 36 a distance away from the hub 20 such that the end of the leg 22 can be pivoted out of one of the cavities 40, 44 and into the other one of the cavities 40, 44 (see
To removably couple the play gym 10 to at least one of the bassinet 12 and the play yard 14, at least one of the mat 16, the bassinet 12 and the play yard 14 is provided with connectors 50. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that the connectors 50 may be implemented in any number of ways. In the illustrated example, the connectors 50 are implemented by fabric pockets 50 which are sewn or otherwise fastened adjacent the corners of the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14 (see
Preferably the legs 22 are selected such that, after being bent, the legs 22 will seek to return to their original, generally straight condition (see
While in the illustrated example the connectors 50 are located on the bassinet 12, connectors 50 could alternatively or additionally be located on the play yard 14 such that, if desired, the play gym 10 could be mounted to the play yard 14 without the bassinet 12. Alternatively, no connectors 50 may be located on the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14, and the play gym 10 can instead be coupled to the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14 via direct connection to the mat 16. In such an approach, the mat 16 may include non-pivoting connectors located within the perimeter of the mat 16 and accessible from the top of the mat 16 to permit the mat 16 to be inserted and/or withdrawn from the bassinet 12 and/or play yard 14 without interference from the connectors and possibly with the play gym 10 still attached to the mat 16.
To removably couple the play gym 10 to the mat 16, the mat 16 is further provided with a plurality of connectors 60. To removably join the legs 22 to the connectors 60, each of the legs 22 preferably terminates in a foot 68 having a diameter approximately equal to the diameter of the leg 22, and a reduced diameter ankle 70 located between the foot 68 and the leg 22 (see
As shown in
In the illustrated example, each of the connectors 60 is pivotably coupled to the mat 16 for movement between a first position wherein the plate 62 is entirely within the perimeter of the mat 16 and a second position wherein the plate 62 lies at least partially outside of the perimeter of the mat 16. In the illustrated example, the plate 62 is pivotably coupled to the underside of the mat 16 via a rivet 62 (see
Although in the illustrated example the connectors 60 are coupled to an undersurface of the mat 16, persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that the connectors 62 could alternatively be connected to other portions of the mat 16. For example, the connectors 62 may be adapted to move into and out of the side edges of the mat 16 or connected to a top surface of the mat 16. Alternatively, the connectors 62 may not be pivoted to the mat 16 and/or the connectors may be located within the perimeter of the mat 16 to permit coupling of the play gym 10 to the mat 16 when the mat 16 is located within the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14.
The enlarged ends of the slots of the apertures 64 are preferably located near the edges of the mat 16 when the connectors 60 are positioned in their extended positions outside of the perimeter of the mat 16. As a result, when the legs 22 are coupled to the connectors 60, they are inserted into the enlarged ends of the apertures 64 near the perimeter of the mat 16. When the legs 22 are released, they will attempt to move from their bent position toward a straight position as explained above. Therefore, the legs 22 are biased to slide away from the perimeter of the mat 16 and away from the enlarged ends of the apertures 64 such that the ankles 70 slide along the slots and the feet 68 run under the plates 62 to thereby secure the legs 22 to the mat 16.
Any or all of the legs 22 of the play gym 10 may be provided with straps 80 and/or split rings 82 to permit objects such as toys to be selectively attached and detached from the play gym 10. Example straps 80 and split rings 82 are shown in
In operation, a user wishing to use the play gym 10 may first erect a bassinet 12 and/or a play yard 14. Erecting the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14 may include positioning a floor mat 16 within one or both of the bassinet 12 and the play yard 14. The user may then secure the play gym 10 at least partially above one or both of the bassinet 12 and the play yard 14 by, for example, inserting the feet 68 of the legs 22 into the connectors 50 of the bassinet 12 and/or play yard 14 or into the connectors of the mat 16.
If the user wishes to use the play gym 10 apart from the bassinet 12 and the play yard 14, the user may remove the play gym 10 from the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14 by, for example, withdrawing the feet from the connectors 50. If the user desires to use the play gym 10 with the mat 16, the user may then remove the mat 16 from the bassinet 12 and/or the play yard 14 and position the mat 16 in a desired location of use. If pivotable connectors 60 are employed as in the illustrated example, the user may then pivot the connectors 60 out from their first positions within the perimeter of the mat 16 to their second positions outside the perimeter of the mat 16. The user may then secure the play gym 10 to the floor mat 16 by, for example, inserting the feet 68 of the legs 22 into corresponding ones of the apertures 64 of the connectors 60.
If the user desires to store the play gym 10, the user may remove the feet 68 of the legs 22 from the apertures 68 to thereby remove the play gym 10 from the floor mat 16. The user may then collapse the play gym 10 by moving the legs 22 from their extended positions (see
Although certain example methods and apparatus have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
This patent arises from a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/062,670, filed on Apr. 4, 2008, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/725,071, filed on Dec. 1, 2003, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,376,993, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/431,079, filed on May 7, 2003, now abandoned. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/062,670, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/725,071 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/431,079 are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Priority to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/062,670, 10/725,071 and 10/431,079 is hereby claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1574226 | Ackermann | Feb 1926 | A |
1630941 | Hood | May 1927 | A |
1826810 | Morishita | Oct 1931 | A |
2065225 | Kennedy | Dec 1936 | A |
2402861 | Winnick | Jun 1946 | A |
2433504 | Zimmermann | Dec 1947 | A |
2464866 | Holtz | Mar 1949 | A |
2475515 | Potter | Jul 1949 | A |
2498203 | Fischer | Feb 1950 | A |
D158030 | Wagner | Apr 1950 | S |
2681659 | Hrinsin | Jun 1954 | A |
2699794 | Potter | Jan 1955 | A |
2820468 | Park et al. | Jan 1958 | A |
2927331 | Ruiz | Mar 1960 | A |
2943287 | Kennedy, Jr. | Jun 1960 | A |
RE24845 | Heffernan et al. | Jul 1960 | E |
2948287 | Rupert | Aug 1960 | A |
2958084 | Kenney | Nov 1960 | A |
2962034 | Finlayson | Nov 1960 | A |
3223098 | Dole, Jr. | Dec 1965 | A |
3448748 | Walrave | Jun 1969 | A |
3546721 | Cleary | Dec 1970 | A |
3706105 | Nicholas et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3878570 | Donnelly | Apr 1975 | A |
3978610 | Stubbmann | Sep 1976 | A |
4015297 | Christian | Apr 1977 | A |
4043349 | Gays et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4073017 | Stevens | Feb 1978 | A |
4188745 | Harvey et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4192334 | Daws | Mar 1980 | A |
4556391 | Tardivel et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
D285880 | Griesenbeck | Sep 1986 | S |
4627588 | Block | Dec 1986 | A |
4637748 | Beavers | Jan 1987 | A |
4664640 | Shindo et al. | May 1987 | A |
4702643 | Thilmony | Oct 1987 | A |
4722713 | Williams et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4750509 | Kim | Jun 1988 | A |
D298768 | Dwosh et al. | Nov 1988 | S |
4790340 | Mahoney | Dec 1988 | A |
4811437 | Dillner et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4852598 | Griesenbeck | Aug 1989 | A |
4901481 | Seeley, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
4945584 | LaMantia | Aug 1990 | A |
5025821 | Page et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5069572 | Niksic | Dec 1991 | A |
5076520 | Bro | Dec 1991 | A |
5161269 | McLean et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5195551 | Ju | Mar 1993 | A |
D335046 | Diaz | Apr 1993 | S |
D339922 | Williams | Oct 1993 | S |
5293890 | Park et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5328286 | Lee | Jul 1994 | A |
5333634 | Taylor | Aug 1994 | A |
5339470 | Shamie | Aug 1994 | A |
5356132 | McEwan et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370570 | Harris | Dec 1994 | A |
D359869 | Oren | Jul 1995 | S |
5478268 | Au | Dec 1995 | A |
D366978 | Mariol | Feb 1996 | S |
D367788 | Lawhorn | Mar 1996 | S |
5517707 | LaMantia | May 1996 | A |
5553336 | Mariol | Sep 1996 | A |
D374692 | Stroud et al. | Oct 1996 | S |
5586345 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5672088 | Chinnis | Sep 1997 | A |
5697111 | Dillner et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5778465 | Myers | Jul 1998 | A |
5819342 | Williams | Oct 1998 | A |
5862548 | Gerhart | Jan 1999 | A |
5867850 | Mariol | Feb 1999 | A |
D408192 | Chiang | Apr 1999 | S |
5904344 | Pope et al. | May 1999 | A |
5928054 | Mast | Jul 1999 | A |
5930854 | O'Neill et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951360 | Fearon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5987822 | McNiff et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991943 | Morris | Nov 1999 | A |
6041455 | Raffo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067676 | Carnahan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6109280 | Custer | Aug 2000 | A |
6113455 | Whelan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123091 | Flynn et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
D435883 | Laosunthara et al. | Jan 2001 | S |
6178978 | Rieber | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192535 | Warner, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199230 | Parikh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200060 | Vernay | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6250837 | Mariol et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6296415 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301731 | Jakubowski et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305037 | Cheng | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336234 | Kuo | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345639 | Rousselle et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6357462 | Laosunthara et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6418575 | Cheng | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6464555 | Paduano | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467107 | Glover et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6510569 | Hu | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516823 | Glover et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6539563 | Hsia | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561823 | Konno | May 2003 | B1 |
6578211 | Tharalson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6604844 | Hussey | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640985 | Cheng | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6679643 | Ham | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702643 | Drosendahl et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711760 | Yang | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6735796 | Warner, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6785921 | Conforti | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810545 | Darling et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7036161 | Harrison et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7037170 | Pacella et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7040585 | Cheng et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7096874 | Forshpan | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7153181 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7376993 | Myers et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
8257229 | Myers et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20020023673 | Hussey | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20080188355 | Myers et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2650639 | Oct 2004 | CN |
2689824 | Apr 2005 | CN |
0930035 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0789526 | Oct 2002 | EP |
8400112 | Aug 1985 | NL |
Entry |
---|
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Complaint for Patent Infringement,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Jun. 3, 2009, 4 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Local Rule 3.4 Notice of Claims Involving Patents,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Jun. 3, 2009, 1 page. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Notification of Docket Entry,” issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Jul. 9, 2009, 1 page. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Notification of Docket Entry,” issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Aug. 5, 2009, 1 page. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant Chicco USA, Inc.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Complaint,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Aug. 20, 2009, 22 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant Chicco USA, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Aug. 20, 2009, 10 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant Chicco USA, Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to Transfer Venue,” with exhibits A-C, filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Aug. 20, 2009, 22 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Docket Entry Text,” issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Aug. 26, 2009, 1 page. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Plaintiffs Response to Chicco's Counterclaims,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Aug. 31, 2009, 7 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Plaintiffs Response to Defendant's Motion to Transfer,” case 1:09-cv-03339, document 30, filed Sep. 11, 2009, 9 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Declaration of Thomas N. Koltun Support of Plaintiffs Response to Defendant's Motion to Transfer,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Sep. 11, 2009, 3 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Sep. 14, 2009, 10 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Opinion and Order,” issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Oct. 23, 2009, 8 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant Chicco USA Inc.'s Motion to Stay the Proceedings Pending Reexamination of the Patent Suit,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Nov. 4, 2009, 2 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Notice of Motion,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Nov. 4, 2009, 1 page. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant Chicco USA, Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to Stay the Proceedings Pending Reexamination of the Patent Suit,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Nov. 4, 2009, 11 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Exhibits A and B,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Nov. 5, 2009, 6 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Notification of Docket Entry,” issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Nov. 13, 2009, 1 page. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 120 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit A, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 12 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit B, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 10 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit C, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 13 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit D, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 36 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit E, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 7 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit F, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 16 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit G, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 7 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit H, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 17 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit I, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 10 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit J, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 23 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit K, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 12 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit L, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 6 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit M, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 1 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit N, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 8 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit O, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 21 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit P, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 12 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit Q, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 14 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit R, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 7 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit S, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 16 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit T, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 15 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit U, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 8 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit V, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 7 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit W, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 3 pages. |
“Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit X, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 2, 2009, 4 pages. |
“Boppy 5-in-1,” from Sensational Beginnings catalog, p. 43 (1 page). |
“Gymini Deluxe—Black White Red,” from http://www.babyuniverse.com/pro.asp?id=5268&rc=qDTeQF8fpnOZAnH8OSY@&siteid=0041024721, May 2004 (1 page). |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Stipulation for Stay Proceedings Pending Outcome for Reexamination,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv-03339, filed Dec. 3, 2009, 3 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Notification of Docket Entry,” issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, case No. 09-cv03339, filed Dec. 10, 2009, 1 page. |
“Defendant Chicco USA, Inc.'s Identification of Known Prior Art,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Dec. 21, 2009, 8 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play Bassinet and Canopy,” Owners Manual, 1999, 10 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play,” Owners Manual, 2000, 15 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play,” Owners Manual, 2001, 20 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play,” Owners Manual 2002, 44 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play Canopy,” Owners Manual, 2003, 8 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play Playard,” Owners Manual, Oct. 2003, 28 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play Playard,” Owners Manual, Dec. 2005, 36 pages. |
Century, “Fold 'N Go Deluxe Bassinet,” Instruction Manual, Sep. 2000, 12 pages. |
Century, “Fold 'N Go,” retrieved Dec. 14, 2009, 1 page. |
Fisher Price, “Bounce and Play,” Instuction Manual, 12 pages. |
Babytrend Products, “Nursery Care Center and Playard,” retrieved Dec. 15, 2009, 1 page. |
Babytrend Products, “B. Trend Nursery Center,” retrieved Dec. 15, 2009, 1 page. |
Tiny Love Products, “Gymini 3-D Activity Gym,” retrieved Dec. 15, 2009, 1 page. |
Kids II, “Play to Learn Toys,” retrieved Dec. 15, 2009, 3 pages. |
Kids II, “Pooh Play Gym,” retrieved Dec. 15, 2009, 2 pages. |
Fisher Price, Kick 'n Crawl Barn, retrieved Dec. 15, 2009, 2 pages. |
Baby Product Research, “Essential Baby Products,” retrieved Aug. 25, 2009, 24 pages. |
Six Innovative New Products Now Available from Evenflo, Business Wire, Dec. 3, 2002, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Failure to Comply with Inter Partes Reexamination Request Filing Requirements,” mailed Dec. 11, 2009, 6 pages. |
Fisher Price, “Motion and Music Jungle Gym,” Model No. 74067, 2003, 8 pages. |
Graco, “Pack 'N Play,” Owners Manual, Nov. 2001, 21 pages. |
Century, “Playard with Bassinet/Changer,” Fold-n-Go Care Center, Instruction Manual, Jan. 1998, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Feb. 26, 2008, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Aug. 21, 2007, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Nov. 30, 2006, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed May 2, 2006, 11 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Nov. 8, 2005, 10 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Apr. 4, 2005, 17 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 15 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit A, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 17 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit B, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 9 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit C, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 26 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit D, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 22 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit E, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 8 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit F, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 16 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit G, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 9 pages. |
“Respondent Brief,” Exhibit H, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 8 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,670, mailed Jul. 26, 2012, 56 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,670, mailed Dec. 29, 2011, 31 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,670, mailed Jan. 24, 2011, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 12/062,670, mailed Apr. 28, 2010, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Inter Partes Reexamination Office Action Closing Prosecution” issued in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, mailed on Nov. 2, 2011, 50 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Inter Partes Reexamination Office Action Closing Prosecution” issued in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, mailed on Jul. 16, 2010, 59 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision Dismissing Petition” issued in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, mailed on Jul. 25, 2011, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Office communication concerning application control No. 95000514” mailed on Jul. 1, 2011, 2 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Inter Partes Reexamination Request Filing Date” issued in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, mailed on Jan. 15, 2010, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Assignment of Inter Partes Reexamination Request” issued in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, mailed on Jan. 15, 2010, 1 page. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision Dismissing Petition Under 37 C.F.R. 1.182” issued in connection with U.S. patent No. 7,376,993 B2, mailed on Oct. 28, 2010, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision Granting Petition for Extension of Time [37 C.F.R. 1.956(c)]” issued in connection with U.S. Patent No. 7,376,993, mailed Jul. 28, 2010, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Office communication concerning Inter Partes Examination” issued in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, mailed on May 12, 2010, 2 pages. |
“Corrected Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requester's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.947” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 27, 2010 in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 52 pages. |
“Corrected Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requester's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.947” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 18, 2011 in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 50 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requester's Emergency Petition Under 37 CFR 1.183 Requesting Waiver of the Page Limitation Requirement Under 37 CFR 1.943(B)” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 5, 2011 in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 117 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requester's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.947” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Feb. 23, 2011, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 117 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requester's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.947” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 12, 2010, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 65 pages. |
“Response to the Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2010,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Sep. 16, 2010, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 29 pages. |
“Rule 131 Declaration of Edward Bretschger filed in the Response to the Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2010,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Sep. 16, 2010, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 32 pages. |
Response to Inter Party Reexamination Office action dated Dec. 22, 2010, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 24, 2011, in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to U.S. Patent 7,376,993, issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, 22 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office Inter Party Reexamination Office action issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to U.S. Patent 7,376,993, issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Dec. 22, 2010, 52 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Report on the Filing of Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark,” filed with the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on Apr. 6, 2012, Case:1:09-cv-03339, Document #:114, referencing reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 1 page. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Statement,” filed with the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on Apr. 5, 2012, Case:1:09-cv-03339, Document #:113, referencing reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 2 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Notice of Issuance of Right to Appeal Notice in Reexamination,” filed with the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on Apr. 4, 2012, Case:1:09-cv-03339, Document #:111, referencing reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 2 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc, “Notice of Issuance of Right to Appeal Notice in Reexamination,” Exhibit 1, filed with the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on Apr. 4, 2012, Case:1:09-cv-03339, Document #:111-1, referencing reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 51 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Revised Discovery Plan,” filed with the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on Mar. 9, 2012, Case:1:09-cv-03339, Document #:97, referencing reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 6 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Graco Children's Products, Inc. and Chicco USA, Inc., “Notification of Docket Entry,” issued by the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on Mar. 7, 2012, Case:1:09-cv-03339, Document #:96, referencing reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 1 page. |
“Notice of Appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 18, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Right of Appeal Notice,” issued in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, mailed Mar. 21, 2012, 50 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 57 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 1, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 13 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 2, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 9 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 3, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 4 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 4, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 15 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 5, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 26 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 6, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 17 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 7, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 8 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 8, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 22 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 9, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 13 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 10, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 9 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 11, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 8 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 12, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 16 pages. |
“Appeal Brief of Third Party Requester Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 41.67,” Exhibit 13, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 15, 2012, in connection with reexamination control No. 95000514, corresponding to patent 7,376,993, 8 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc. d/b/a Artsana USA Inc., “Plaintiffs Final Response to Defendant's Final Invalidity Contentions,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, case No. 1:09-cv-03339, filed Sep. 25, 2012, 9 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc. d/bla Artsana USA Inc., “Artsana's Final Invalidity Contentions,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, case No. 1:09-cv-03339, served Aug. 28, 2012, filed Sep. 25, 2012, 19 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc. d/bla Artsana USA Inc., “Plaintiffs Final Response to Defendant's Final Invalidity Contentions,” Exhibit A, filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Easter Division, case No. 1:09-cv-03339, filed Sep. 25, 2012, 11 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc. d/bla Artsana USA Inc., “Plaintiffs Final Response to Defendant's Final Invalidity Contentions,” Exhibit B, filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Easter Division, case No. 1:09-cv-03339, filed Sep. 25, 2012, 9 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant's Brief in Support of the Terms of U.S. Patent 7,376,993 that Require Construction,” filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, case No. 1:09-cv-03339, document #146, filed Nov. 13, 2012, 30 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant's Brief in Support of the Terms of U.S. Patent 7,376,993 that Require Construction,” Exhibit A, filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, case No. 1:09-cv-03339, document #146-1, filed Nov. 13, 2012, 3 pages. |
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc., “Defendant's Brief in Support of the Terms of U.S. Patent 7,376,993 that Require Construction,” Exhibit B, filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division, case No. 1:09-cv-03339, document #146-2, filed Nov. 13, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 131 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit A, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 12 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit B, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 10 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit C, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 13 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit D, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 36 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit E, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 7 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit F, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 16 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit G, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 7 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit H, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit I, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 10 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit J, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 23 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit K, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 12 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit L, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 6 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit M, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 1 page. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit N, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 8 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit O, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 21 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit P, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 12 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit Q, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 14 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit R, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 7 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit S, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 16 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit T, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 15 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit U, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 8 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit V, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 7 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit W, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Replacement Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” Exhibit X, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 8, 2010, 4 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Request for Inter Partes Reexamination,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Feb. 12, 2010, 27 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Inter Partes Reexamination Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, mailed Feb. 12, 2010, 21 pages. |
“Response to the Office Action Dated Feb. 12, 2010,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, Mar. 12, 2010, 50 pages. |
“Response to the Office Action Dated Feb. 12, 2010,” Appendix A, Rule 131 Declaration of James A. Flight, with exhibits 1-7, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, Mar. 12, 2010, 12 pages. |
“Response to the Office Action Dated Feb. 12, 2010,” Appendix B, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, Mar. 12, 2010, 4 pages. |
“Response to the Office Action Dated Feb. 12, 2010,” Appendix C, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, Mar. 12, 2010, 4 pages. |
“Response to the Office Action Dated Feb. 12, 2010,” Appendix D, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, Mar. 12, 2010, 9 pages. |
“Response to the Office Action Dated Feb. 12, 2010,” Appendix E, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, Mar. 12, 2010, 12 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 39 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit Z, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-1, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,07, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 11 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-2, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 2 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-3, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-4, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071 filed Oct. 18, 2010, 2 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-5, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-6, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-7, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-8, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-9, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-10, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 6 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-11, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 3 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-12, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 12 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit AA, AA-13, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 5 pages. |
“Third Party Inter Partes Reexamination Requestor's Comments Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.947,” Exhibit BB, filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 95/000,514, corresponding to US patent 7,376,993 issued from U.S. Appl. No. 10/725,071, filed Oct. 18, 2010, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120309592 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12062670 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 13589777 | US | |
Parent | 10725071 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 12062670 | US | |
Parent | 10431079 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10725071 | US |