Embodiments of the invention are directed, in general, to Power Line Communication (PLC) systems and, more specifically, encoding frame control header in PLC systems.
Various OFDM-based standards exist for narrowband power-line communications, such as the G3-GENA, G.hnem, IEEE-P1901.2 standards.
Power line communications (PLC) include systems for communicating data over the same medium that is also used to transmit electric power to residences, buildings, and other premises, such as wires, power lines, or other conductors. In its simplest terms, PLC modulates communication signals over existing power lines. This enables devices to be networked without introducing any new wires or cables. This capability is extremely attractive across a diverse range of applications that can leverage greater intelligence and efficiency through networking. PLC applications include utility meters, home area networks, lighting, and solar.
PLC may also serve as an important enabling technology for the mass deployment of solar equipment by providing a communication channel to solar inverters for monitoring and managing power across the grid by utility companies. While radio frequency (RF) communications have made some progress in solar installations, PLC offers an ideal means for connecting equipment with high reliability and at a low cost on DC or AC lines.
PLC is a generic term for any technology that uses power lines as a communications channel. Various PLC standardization efforts are currently in work around the world. The different standards focus on different performance factors and issues relating to particular applications and operating environments. Two of the most well-known PLC standards are G3 and PRIME. G3 has been approved by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). IEEE is developing the IEEE P1901.2 standard that is based on G3. Each PLC standard has its own unique characteristics. PRIME is designed for low voltage lines with low noise and targets higher data rates. On the other hand, G3 is designed for medium voltage lines and targets lower data rates.
Having thus described the invention(s) in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. One skilled in the art may be able to use the various embodiments of the invention.
Described are methods for discriminating between two types of encoding schemes for the frame control header (FCH) used in G3-type and P1901.2 narrow band OFDM communications OFDM communications. The two modes for encoding are:
Table 1 summarizes the different possibilities for FCH encoding format.
IEEE P1901.2 encodes the FCH symbols with respect to the preamble (DP or “coherent” mode). ITU-T G9903 may encode it either differentially with respect to the previous symbol (DS) or encode it with respect to the preamble (DP).
IEEE P1901.2 encodes the FCH (G3) symbols with respect to the preamble (DP or “coherent” mode). ITU-T G9903 may encode it either differentially with respect to the previous symbol (DS) or encode it with respect to the preamble (DP).
An OFDM signal is generated and provided to a power line circuit, such as a medium voltage (MV) or low voltage (LV) power line. This is done thorough analog front end (AFE) and coupling circuitry. The coupling circuitry may include, for example, line drivers, transformers, filters, and MV/LV couplers.
Two types of encoding schemes are used in mapper 160. DS is differential with respect to the previous symbol and DP is differential with respect to the preamble. This mode is sometimes referred to as “coherent” mode.
where
φk(m): denotes the phase of the symbol at the output of the constellation encoding block corresponding to the kth subcarrier in the mth FCH OFDM symbol
θk(m): denotes the phase of the symbol that is mapped to the kth subcarrier in the mth FCH OFDM symbol.
In both cases, the constellation encoding for the FCH is chosen from the transmit constellation set {+1,−1} 200 as shown in
The constellation encoding rule and modulation mapping rule may also be described as in Tables 1a and 1b below
In Table 1b, for DP encoding, ψk has the same definition as
1st FCH symbol (m=1): ψk=
Subsequent FCH symbols (m>1):
A key point to note is that since φε{0,π} this implies
Therefore, if a receiver does not know a prioiri that the FCH is DS or DP encoded, it cannot determine which method was used until it has decoded the full FCH frame and checked to see whether the frame check sequence (CRC) passed. As the FCH consists of multiple OFDM symbols (13 symbols in the CENELEC-A band and 12 symbols in the FCC band), this results in increased processing and memory requirements.
Modem 304 includes a processor (e.g., a digital signal processor, (DSP)) 304a coupled to an associated memory 305 that that stores a disclosed FCH detector algorithm which provides code for the FCH detector algorithm.
Memory 305 comprises non-transitory machine readable storage, for example, static random-access memory (SRAM). In operation, the processor 304a is programmed to implement the FCH detector algorithm. Modem 304 includes a timer 307, such as for ACK transmission, Carrier Sense Multiple Access/collision avoidance (CSMA)/CA) back-off and data transmission purposes.
The PLC transceiver (TX/RX) 306 is communicably coupled to the modem 304 for coupling of the communications device 300 to the shared powerline 340. Transceiver 306 facilitates communications with other SNs and the BN on the powerline 340.
The modem 304 is shown formed on an integrated circuit (IC) 320 comprising a substrate 325 having a semiconductor surface 326, such as a silicon surface. Memory 305 may be included on the IC 320. In another embodiment the modem 304 is implemented using 2 processor chips, such as 2 DSP chips. Besides the DSP noted above, the processor 304a can comprise a desktop computer, laptop computer, cellular phone, smart phone, or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
Disclosed modems 304 and disclosed communications devices 300 may be used in a PLC network to provide a networked device that in service is connected to a powerline via a power cord. In general, the “networked device” can be any equipment that is capable of transmitting and/or receiving information over a powerline. Examples of different types of networked devices include, but are not limited or restricted to a computer, a router, an access point (AP), a wireless meter, a networked appliance, an adapter, or any device supporting connectivity to a wired or wireless network.
In order to allow for the receiver to discriminate between DP and DS type FCH encoding without having to decode the whole FCH frame, a modified constellation is used with DP, which allows for simple detection mechanisms to be used at the receiver (rx).
The following embodiments describe different ways in which the modulation set is modified for the FCH when doing DP encoding (differential with respect to the preamble). The key idea is that the constellation set is modified to include complex symbols that lie on the unitary circle thus allowing the symbol phases φk(m) to be more than just 0 and π.
If FCH is encoded using DP, the modulation constellation on each of the subcarriers for the FCH is chosen from the transmit constellation set {+j, −j} 400 as shown in
Some examples of mapping rules that generate the above constellation are shown below:
If FCH is encoded using DP, the modulation on each of the subcarriers for the FCH is chosen from the transmit constellation set {+1,+j, −1, −j} 500 as shown in
Note that the above constellation may be generated by using the mapping rule as shown in table 5 below
One example of constellation encoding rules that generate the above constellation is given in Table 6 below together with the corresponding modulation mapping rule
If DP encoding is done on the FCH, the modulation on each of the subcarriers for the FCH is chosen from the transmit constellation set
600 as shown in
One example of constellation encoding rules that generate the above constellation is given in Table 7 below together with the corresponding modulation mapping rule
In some embodiments, the output of the modulation mapper 160 may be further multiplied by a cover sequence 710 as shown in
Note that the effect of the cover sequence 710 is to introduce a phase change of 0 or pi on θk(m). The phase change may be independent from subcarrier to subcarrier; be the same for a subset of subcarriers, or be the same for all the subcarriers in a given OFDM symbol.
FCH Mode Detection at Receiver
A receiver such as communication device shown in
Hence, one embodiment for an FCH mode detector at the receiver is to count the number of demodulated symbols in regions bb and dd and compare this to the number of demodulated symbols in region cc and aa. If the count in bb and dd is more than the count in cc and aa, the FCH is declared to be DP encoded.
As noted in the introduction, if DS encoding is over the {−1, +1} constellation then
On the other hand if we modify the DP encoding to be over the {−j, +j} constellation, then φk(m)ε{−π/2,π/2} (unless stated otherwise throughout the remaining of this section we will assume that DP encoding is done with {−j, +j} constellation in order to illustrate the Encoding-Detection (ED) methodology). This allows a receiver to intelligently detect whether the FCH follows DP or DS encoding by determining where the majority of the demodulated symbols lie.
Let
yk(m)=hk(m)ejθ
Pk=hkejψ
where yk(m) is the received signal in the mth FCH symbol and kth subcarrier, Pk is the received syncP preamble symbol in the kth subcarrier, hk(m) denote the channel gain, ejθ
If the detector at the receiver is a DP detector unless, the following intermediate metric is first constructed in order to remove the phase rotation due to preamble
yk1(m)=(Pk)*yk(m) (4)
In case the detector at the receiver is a DS detector, the intermediate metric is
yk1(m)=(Pk)*yk(m) for m=1
yk1(m)=(yk(m−1))*yk(m) for m>1 (5)
Then based on
|Re(yk1(m))|>|Im(yk1(m))|−>{−1,1}
Re(yk1(m))|<|Im(yk1(m))|−>{−j,j} (6)
where Re implies the real operation, Im implies the imaginary operation and |. | implies taking the absolute value. The above decision rule can be generalized by first defining the metric:
ζk(m)=α1|Re(yk1(m))|α
where (α1,β1,α2,β2,λ) are constants. Then the decision rule is given by
ζk(m)>0−>{−1,1}
ζk(m)<0−>{−j,j} (8)
Note that (8) is a special case of (6) with (α1=1, β1=1, α2=1, β2=1, λ=1). Table 8 is illustrative of the expected constellation output in the ideal (no noise, ideal channel) scenario for the different combinations of receiver detectors and transmitted FCH format.
From Table 8 it is clear that if the Rx metric is based on (4), then subcarrier outputs from all the FCH symbols may be used to make a decision. Whereas if the Rx metric is based on (5) then subcarrier outputs from only the first FCH symbol may be used to make a decision.
Variations of Metric and Decoding Rules:
It is assume in this section unless otherwise stated that the intermediate metric yk1(m) is based on Equation (4).
In some embodiments analogous to hard decision decoding, the decision metric ζk(m) for each subcarrier may first be quantized to a +1 or −1 value
ζk(m)>0−>{tilde over (ζ)}k(m)=1
ζk(m)<0−>{tilde over (ζ)}k(m)=−1 (9)
followed by averaging across subcarriers and symbols i.e,
and then running the decision rule
{tilde over (ζ)}>0−>{−1,1}
{tilde over (ζ)}<0−>{−j,j} (11)
The number of symbols to average over may be predefined or it may be adaptive. An example of an adaptive system is whereby once |{tilde over (ζ)}|>metricThreshold, then the decision is forced. The number of subcarriers to average over may be predefined or the averaging may only be done over a group of subcarriers with an SNR exceeding an SNR threshold value. The SNR can be computed based on the preamble.
In some embodiments analogous to soft decision decoding, no quantization may be done on the subcarrier metric ζk(m) before averaging i.e., the decision metric is constructed as follows
and then running the decision rule given in (11).
In yet another embodiment, ζk(m) may be weighted based on the symbol number or subcarrier number. As an example in cases where there is high residual frequency offset, the reliability of metric ζk(m) may decrease with increasing symbol number. Hence the following decision metric can be constructed
where ƒ(k,m) is a weighting function that depends on subcarrier number and symbol number. The weighting function may also take into account the unreliability of tones where intereferers are detected (i.e., the information in these tones is less and the weighting function thus assigns less weight)
From equations (3)-(6), it is clear that the phase estimate of the preamble will also affect the performance. In order to reduce the impact of noise, the preamble estimates can also be smoothed or averaged over time. Smoothing can also be done over frequency.
In some embodiments, the subcarrier metric can also be re-defined to be
where f is any monotonically increasing or decreasng function e.g., arctangent, log etc. . . .
The decision rule in this case is then given by
ζk(m)>α−>{−1,1}
ζk(m)<α−>{−j,j}
where α is a constant.
All combinations the previously discussed ideas are also valid i.e.,
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this invention pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions, and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/715,675, which is titled “Encoding Method for Frame Control Header (FCH)” and was filed on Oct. 18, 2012, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7376075 | Petranovich | May 2008 | B1 |
20070110108 | Kang | May 2007 | A1 |
20090041166 | Patel | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100272210 | Kwon | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100316140 | Razazian et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110043340 | Kim | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120327987 | Dabak | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Yonge, Larry, Jose Abad, Kaywan Afkhamie, Lorenzo Guerrieri, Srinivas Katar, Hidayat Lioe, Pascal Pagani, Raffaele Riva, Daniel M. S. “An Overview of the Homeplug AV2 Technology,” Power-line Communications: Smart Grid, Transmission and Propagation. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Aug. 3, 2012, pp. 35-54 (pp. 1-20 for article). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140112397 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61715675 | Oct 2012 | US |