1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to methods, devices and materials for use in treating pleural effusion.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the thoracic cavity, a layer of visceral pleura covers the surface of the lung, and a layer of parietal pleura lines the inner surface of the thoracic cavity, including the inside of the ribs and diaphragm. These smooth membranes normally contain a small amount of clear, plasma-like pleural fluid that helps reduce the friction between the lung surface and its surroundings as the lung expands and contracts with respiration. The accumulation of an abnormal amount of fluid between the visceral and parietal pleuras is called pleural effusion. For example, a patient with lung cancer can have a plurality of parietal or visceral lesions that produce clear fluid that gets into the pleural space.
The etiology of pleural effusions is varied and includes congestive heart failure, pneumonia, and pulmonary malignancies among others. Patients with pleural effusion often present with dyspnea, minimal to moderate chest pain, dullness on percussion and possible pleural friction rub and/or mediastinal shift. The existence of an effusion can generally be confirmed with chest radiography or CT. There is significant potential for morbidity and mortality due to the tendency for the volume of the pleural effusion fluid to compress the lungs, thereby restricting their expansion.
If the pleural effusion is recurring or is caused by a progressive pulmonary malignancy, pleurodesis is generally indicated. Pleurodesis is a therapeutic procedure involving drainage of the pleural fluid and introduction of a sclerosing agent between the two pleural membranes to cause a scarring reaction, which effectively fuses the two layers to one another. The goal is to close the pleural space and preclude fluid from entering it again. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,401, which describes some prior treatments for pleural effusion. Current treatments include, for example, surgical intervention to drain the fluid, distribute talc into the pleural space, draw a vacuum, and then monitor the patient in the hospital.
A variety of agents are currently used to perform chemical pleurodesis, including radioactive isotopes, tetracycline, chemotherapeutic agents and talc. Two things are necessary for a successful pleurodesis: (1) The sclerosing agent must be evenly distributed across the pleural surfaces; and (2) the lung must still be able to expand effectively after the procedure.
Treatment for pleural effusion currently involves introduction of a chest tube through the chest wall into the pleural space, followed by drainage of the fluid. The chest tube is then clamped, allowing the lung to partially collapse. A syringe containing a sclerosing agent is attached to the chest tube, and the agent is insufflated into the pleural space. The chest tube is unclamped, allowing the lung to inflate fully and to pull the agent further into the pleural space. The patient is rotated in bed over the following few hours to assist in the equal distribution of the agent. The chest tube is removed when there is less than 100 cm3 of fluid per day removed from the pleural space. This pleurodesis procedure may be done at the bedside.
The sclerosing agents irritate the pleural membranes, eventually causing them to become inflamed and scarred, which fuses the layers together. Talc is the most commonly used sclerosing agent and has a reported 90% success rate. Although talc has demonstrated a high rate of success, there are complications associated with the procedure, most of which are caused by the sclerosing agent and the nature of its action. Patients commonly experience pain during the installation of the agent, which is very irritating and inflammatory, and a narcotic is therefore usually administered prior to the procedure. Also, fever is common in more than 30% of patients undergoing talc pleurodesis, possibly due to the pleuritis it causes. The fever generally lasts for approximately 48 hours.
It is difficult to evenly distribute most sclerosing agents, especially talc, because they do not flow. Talc does not mix well with saline and has a tendency to clump. Incomplete lung expansion due to a partially trapped lung can occur when pleurodesis is only partially successful.
Additionally, pleurodesis is performed over several days. While waiting for the full effects of the scarring action to take place, the patient is in danger of partial or full respiratory failure. Thus, hospitalization and close monitoring is required during this period.
What is needed, therefore, is a device for distributing sclerosing agents which reduces the risk of partial or full respiratory failure.
The present invention provides methods, materials and devices for treating pleural effusions. Other methods and compositions are also provided in U.S. patent applications entitled “Lung Device with Sealing Features” application Ser. No. 11/178,243 filed Jul. 8, 2005; “Intra-Bronchial Lung Volume Reduction System,” application Ser. No. 11/153,235 filed Jun. 14, 2005; “Targeting Damaged Lung Tissue Using Compositions,” application Ser. No. 11/008,577, filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Targeting Damaged Lung Tissue,” application Ser. No. 11/008,092, filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Targeting Sites of Damaged Lung Tissue Using Composition,” application Ser. No. 11/008,094 filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Targeting Sites of Damaged Lung Tissue,” application Ser. No. 11/008,578, filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Imaging Damaged Lung Tissue Using Compositions,” application Ser. No. 11/008,649, filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Imaging Damaged Lung Tissue,” application Ser. No. 11/008,777, filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Lung Volume Reduction Using Glue Compositions,” application Ser. No. 11/008,093, filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Glue Composition for Lung Volume Reduction,” application Ser. No. 11/008,087 filed Dec. 8, 2004; “Glue Composition for Lung Volume Reduction,” application Ser. No. 11/008,580 filed Dec. 8, 2004; and “Lung Volume Reduction Using Glue Composition,” application Ser. No. 11/008,782 filed Dec. 8, 2004.
One aspect of the invention provides a method of treating a patient for pleural effusion comprising percutaneously delivering an adhesive material to a pleural space of the patient. The delivering step can also comprise ejecting the adhesive material from a delivery device into the pleural space and further comprising mixing components of the adhesive material in the delivery device prior to the ejecting step. In some embodiments, while performing the method of the invention, the delivery device converts from a delivery configuration to an operational configuration. A further embodiment of the method can include percutaneously inserting a pleural space access member into the patient. Suction can be applied to the pleural space prior to delivering the adhesive material to the pleural space in performing the method of an embodiment of the invention. When suction is applied, the suction can be applied through the pleural space access member. Further, the delivering step of the method can comprise delivering the adhesive material through the pleural space access member. An embodiment of the method can also include delivering adhesive material to the pleural space without delivering a fibrosis inducing material to the pleural space. The adhesive material can be spread within the pleural space. The adhesive materials suitable for any of the embodiments of the methods of the invention have strength values up to 1.5 psi, or more; preferably having a strength value between 0.2-0.6 psi. In addition, the adhesive material suitable for any of the embodiments of the methods of the invention have viscosity levels of 1.1 centipoise and higher. Further, materials suitable for performing any of the methods of the invention can be selected from the group comprising hydrogels, proteins, polymers and cross-linking agents. The hydrogel adhesive may include material selected from the group consisting of hyalurons, hyaluronic acid, alginates, chitins, chitosans, and derivatives thereof. The protein material comprises material that can be selected from the group consisting of albumins, porcine albumin, collagens and gelatins. The polymer material comprises material selected from the group consisting of poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolide). The cross-linking agent material comprises material that may be selected from the group consisting of glutaraldehyde and stable polyaldehyde.
Another aspect of the invention includes a pleural effusion treatment apparatus comprising an adhesive material adapted to adhere pleural membranes defining a pleural space and a pleural space access member adapted to deliver the adhesive material to the pleural space. In an embodiment of the apparatus, the pleural space access member comprises an adhesive material delivery device. Further, the adhesive material delivery device can comprise a syringe. Adhesive materials suitable for the embodiments of the invention comprise two or more components, the delivery device comprising a mixing element adapted to mix the two components prior to injection of the adhesive material into the patient. The pleural space access member of an embodiment of the invention can comprise a chest tube. Additionally, an apparatus of the invention can comprise a suction apparatus. Where a suction apparatus is provided, the apparatus can be adapted to apply suction through the pleural space access member. A spreading element can also be provided that is adapted to spread adhesive material within the pleural space. For example, the pleural space access member can be a catheter. Various shapes of the pleural space access member can be employed including, but not limited to, a loop, an S shape, a V shape. Additionally, the shape can have an actuator forming a bend, a pull wire, and/or a memory element incorporated therein. Further, materials suitable for use in the adhesives suitable for the apparatus of the embodiments of the invention can be selected from the group comprising hydrogels, protein, and cross-linking agents. Polymer such as poly(lactic acid), poly(glycolide) can also be provided.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
The invention provides methods, materials and devices for treating a pleural effusion by gluing the pleura together using a suitable adhesive, such as glue, as a sealant to prevent the passage of liquid or gas. The materials used in the method include a fast-acting adhesive that cures in less than three days, more preferably less than two days, even more preferably less than one day, and most preferably less than one hour. A specific cure time may be tunable to allow for glue distribution before curing fully. Some glue formulations may require ancillary light sources, primers, catalysts, radiofrequency energy, electrical energy or radiation to cause the glue to cure.
Glue formulations for use with this invention may include solids, semi-solids, hydrogels, foams, agars, or sol-gels. Some glue formulations work in wet or dry tissue surface conditions. Some glue formulations may also stop active bleeding (i.e., provide hemostasis). The glues are preferably biocompatible and can successfully fuse tissue in wet conditions. The glues adhere the pleura without causing fibrosis, inflammation or scarring of the pleural tissue. The glues are flexible and conformable to tissue geometry, and they possess high tensile strength. Solvents can be used to deliver the glue in order to drive the glue into the tissue.
One preferred embodiment is a glue formulation that crosslinks (chemically bonds) to the biological tissue it is applied to. More specifically, the adhesive either crosslinks to collagen or promotes the crosslinking of collagen at two adjoining tissue surfaces to be fused and allow for high adhesion.
Another preferred embodiment is a glue formulation that has a radiopaque component so that the glued boundary can be identified using x-ray-based imaging techniques during or after the procedure. Additives may include tantalum, platinum, bismuth, radiopaque metals, and polymers. Polymers can include, for example, poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolide). Agents and drugs can also be added as primers.
Although many alternative glue formulations may be suitable to achieve these goals, one preferred glue formulation consists of a combination of a cross-linking agent, such as glutaraldehyde or stable polyaldehyde, and a protein, such as albumin, including porcine albumin and collagen, with or without additional additives. One such material suitable for pleural fusion is described in US Patent Application Publ. No. 2004/0081676. It works uniquely as a biologic glue that typically cures within a few minutes to fuse pleural layers without causing or requiring inflammation or heat. The glue's intrinsic viscosity can be tuned to allow for fast or slow spreading across target lung regions. The glue may be used for other purposes as well, such as anastomosis of blood vessels and bronchi/bronchioles and to seal pulmonary structures from air leaks, bleeding, or fluid leaks. Another adhesive that may be suitable is a cyanoacrylate adhesive.
Alternative glue formulations may be suitable to achieve these goals such as a combination of any one of the previously described components in combination with other additives that may include elastin, fibrin, glycoprotein, liposomes, thrombin, calcium, neuroleptics, vitamins, growth factors, glucocorticosteroids, steroids, antibiotics, antibacterial compounds, bacteriocidal and bacteriostatic compounds, antiviral compounds, antifungal compounds, antiparasitic compounds, tumoricidal compounds, tumoristatic compounds, toxins, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, proteins, peptides, minerals, neurotransmitters, lipoproteins, glycoproteins, immunomodulators, immunoglobulins and fragments thereof, dyes, radiolabels, radiopaque compounds, fluorescent compounds, fatty acids, polysaccharides, cell receptor binding molecules, anti-inflammatories, antiglaucomic compounds, mydriatic compounds, anesthetics, nucleic acids, and polynucleotides.
The glue can be packaged sterile, in a single part or in two liquid parts in an applicator. Upon delivery of a two-part formulation, liquid components can be mixed as they are delivered, by an applicator or stirring or mixing nozzle device. After application, the formulation may quickly or slowly solidify into a flexible solid glue. The glue can also be premixed and then applied. The glue may be formulated as a two part solution that can be applied independently. In doing so, the first part may be applied and allowed for spread time before the second is applied.
Devices for use with the invention preferably introduce or spread the glue evenly over the surfaces of the visceral and parietal pleurae. The pleural effusion glue may be applied in an aerosol form to cover large organ surfaces more effectively or as a liquid, via a syringe, a catheter (e.g., through the patient's chest tube), or other applicator.
A delivery catheter 24 having a plurality of holes 26 at its distal end is inserted through chest tube 16 into the pleural space. A two-part syringe 28 may be used to deliver an adhesive material through delivery catheter 24 into the pleural space. As described above, the adhesive material is preferably a glue that does not contain any fibrosis-inducing or inflammatory material. Curing of the glue causes pleurae 14 and 12 to adhere, thereby reducing the likelihood that the pleural space will again be filled with excess fluid.
To ensure adequate adhesion of the pleurae, more than one device may be used to introduce adhesive material to the pleural space. For example, a second syringe 30 and delivery catheter 32 may be used together with the device of
The arrangement of the holes in the delivery catheter may be modified to help provide even distribution of adhesive material within the pleural space. For example,
As an alternative to a delivery catheter with multiple adhesive material delivery holes, the delivery catheter may have a single delivery port. For example, the delivery catheter 120 shown in
Some adhesives may be formed as two-part compositions.
As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the delivery device can be used by using a single tube to drain fluid within the pleural space and then deliver the adhesive material which acts as a sealant to prevent the passage of liquid or gas. Alternatively, the fluid can be left within the pleural space, the delivery device can be inserted between the pleural layers and then maneuvered into place before delivering the sealant. In this scenario, it may be desirable to drain the fluid from the pleural space before delivering the sealant. Suitable sealants will cure within, approximately, 20 seconds to 1 minute, to enable the curing process to proceed without being effected by movement of the lungs during breathing.
Although many alternative sealant formulations may be suitable for this purpose, a preferred sealant would consist of primarily a combination of stable polyaldehyde, albumin and collagen with or without additional additives. The sealant can also have agents that initiate or accelerate the clotting cascade so the sealant can be used as a hemostatic agent. For example, a suitable material is described in US Patent Application Publ. No. 2004/0081676. This sealant works as a biologic glue that cures within a few minutes to seal pleural layers without causing inflammation or heat. The glue's intrinsic viscosity can be tuned to allow for fast or slow delivery through a delivery system, such as those shown above and includes glue viscosity more than 1.1 centipoise. This glue formulation is appropriate for use with all lung tissue and structures within the pulmonary system as well as pulmonary vasculature. It can also be formulated and used for any adhesive or anti-adhesion purpose including anastomosis of blood vessels and bronchi/bronchioles and to seal pulmonary structures from air leaks, bleeding or fluid leaks. Ideally, the sealant will cure within a few minutes, works well in a damp or wet environment, and blocks air or fluid from entering the pleural cavity. Typically, the glues are composed of a condensation product of glutaraldehyde that consists of cross-linked albumin, including porcine albumin. Adhesion values for the glue can be up to 1.5 psi, more preferably between 0.2-0.6 psi.
As described above, two-part sealants may be used with this invention. Sealant components for this application may include fibrin/thrombin, activated PEG/PEG-diamine, albumin/PEG, and albumin/glutaraldehyde sealants. The sealant is an implantable material that may contain hemostatic agents such as chitin derivatives including but not limited to carboxymethyl chitin and chitosan (1-100% deacetylated). The sealant components may also contain additives that affect viscosity, set time, adhesion, and biocompatibility. The albumin component may be formulated in weight to weight ratios of 10-50% where the remaining mass balance is aqueous solutions of salts, buffers, and additives or combinations thereof. The other component of the sealant is a cross-linker containing glutaraldehyde or derivatives thereof in weight to volume ratios of 1-25% where the remaining balance is an aqueous solution with or without additives, salts, or buffers or combinations thereof. These solutions may be applied from dispensers that deliver a ratio of 1 unit volume of protein solution per 1 unit volume of cross-linker solution (1:1 protein:cross-linker) and may be applied in ratios up to 10 unit volumes of protein solution per unit volume of cross-linker solution. Furthermore, mixing may occur by passing the solutions through a static mixing tip with helical or other geometrical devices that enhance the mixing efficiency. Sealants prepared from these solutions contain 5-45% protein and 0.5-14% crosslinker.
Other suitable sealants and other agents are described in US Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2004/0052850; US Pat. Appl. Publ. No. 2004/0081676; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,577; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,092; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,094; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,578; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,649; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,777; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,087; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,093; U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,580; and U.S. Ser. No. 11/008,782.
Materials that solidify such as glue compositions form a structure that is typically stiffer than the intrinsic stiffness of lung tissue. Specifically, pull tests of lung parenchyma (comprised of alveolar sacks and collagen) sections show that the composite stiffness is very low. When agents are combined that form a stiffer structure than the underlying biomaterial or lung tissue, the modulus mismatch causes irritation, inflammation, tissue thickening, fibrosis, a remodeling cascade and adhesions that will promote and maintain lung volume reduction. Compositions that dry out or maintain viscosity levels above 2 centipoise (a measure of dynamic viscosity) generate shear and cause this stiffness mismatch to promote adhesions. Agents and hydrogel materials thicker than 10 centipoise work better. The glutaraldehyde glue technology employed can produce compositions that have 15 centipoise viscosity and higher levels up to and beyond 150 centipoise. By increasing the glue cross-linking properties, agents can be delivered that solidify to a gel or harder substance. Materials that gel to produce solids with a modulus greater than 10-20 centimeters of H2O will produce this same effect. Materials that are stiffer in a range between 20 and 100 centimeter of H2O are better. Materials that are stiffer than 100 cm H2O are preferable. Implantable materials with viscosity enhancing agents to promote these effects can be manufactured.
Many of these agents cause tissue binding to form localized adhesions or a bio-response that will help maintain permanent pleurae bonding. Introduction of these materials instigates one or more elements of a tissue remodeling cascade process. The process includes tissue polymer decomposition and/or necrosis that leads to recruitment of cellular respondents that include one or more of the following: Neutrophils, white blood cells, macrophages, CD8+, MMP's, Interlukens, cytokins and protocylins. The tissue then remodels to initiate tissue formation and thickening that culminates in the formation of tissue adhesions.
Other materials that can initiate this effect are cadmium, smoke artifacts, tars, materials that irritate tissue such as alcohols, solvents, organic solvents, acids, materials that are basic and materials that are acidic. These materials include compounds or compositions that have pH levels between 1 and 6.9 with materials closest to 1 being a preferable acid material. Additionally, compounds or materials that have pH levels between 7.5 and 14 work very well; materials closest to 14 work best.
When applying an adhesive material of the present invention, such as an implantable hydrogel comprised of a biocompatible material, or an implantable liquid that undergoes a physical transition from a liquid to a gel or other solid such as solid adhesives, control of deposition is very important. Ways of controlling deposition include localized dispensing of the sealant through a suitable device containing a lumen, and also through the addition of agents that increase the viscosity of one or more components of the implantable material. Such agents include biocompatible materials with viscosities that are greater than those of water, and include glycerol, polymeric materials such as proteins, carbohydrate-based polymers and derivatives thereof, synthetic materials including polyethylene glycols (PEG), polyethylene oxides (PEO), polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), polyvinyl alcohol and other components described in the “United States Pharmacopeia” and the “Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients”, edited by A. H. Kibbe. Other materials for controlling viscosity include oils, lipids, and fatty acids, including oleic acid, and phosphocholines. Phase separation can be controlled with emulsifiers including poly sorbate. For sealants prepared by mixing two or more components, the viscosities of one or more of the components can be modified by adding an appropriate agent to control spreading after application. Viscosities of these components can range from 1 to 1000 centistokes (a measure of kinematic viscosity).
Deposition and control of spreading of sealants containing two or more components are also affected by the gel time, or set time, of the mixed sealant. Sealants with short set times are preferable to those with longer set times. Set time can be controlled by the addition of set time modifiers, including agents that reduce or increase the set time relative to the corresponding formulation lacking the set time modifier. An example of an agent that decreases the set time is carboxymethyl cellulose. An example of an agent that increases the set time is glycerol.
Glutaraldehyde, as currently processed and used in some commercial sealants, undergoes reversible reactions that cause reoccurring inflammation. These properties can be improved by chemical modification of the glutaraldehyde. One such modification includes glutaraldehyde condensation reactions, as described in “Bioconjugate Techniques” by G. T. Hermanson. This condensation involves the formation of derivatives of glutaraldehyde in aqueous solutions containing acid or base. This reaction can be monitored by ultraviolet spectroscopy at or near 280 and 234 nanometers. At 280 nanometers, pure glutaraldehyde has significant absorbance, and little or no absorbance at 234 nanometers when measured as an aqueous solution at 0.5% weight to volume. When glutaraldehyde is chemically modified, it has significant absorbance at 234 nanometers. These derivatives are effective cross-linking agents when used with nucleophilic substrates such as proteins, including albumins. Furthermore, sealants prepared from glutaraldehyde derivatives are adhesive in vivo, through chemical or mechanical means, or a combination of chemical and mechanical means.
Implantable materials are adhesives, glues and sealants. For the present invention implantable materials include agents administered into tissue, including sealants, which may be comprised of hydrogels, proteins, or other biocompatible materials, that can be implanted into compromised tissue to benefit the patient. Examples of hydrogels include those prepared from natural sources including carbohydrate-based materials. Such materials include hyaluronans, hyaluronic acid, alginates, chitins, chitosans, and derivatives thereof. Proteins that enable the present invention include albumins, including porcine albumins, collagens, gelatins, and other proteins that can be cross-linked or that form solutions with viscosities greater than water. Other implantable materials include those prepared by mixing two or more components so that a viscous solution, gel, or solid is formed. Such implantable materials are prepared from a protein substrate where the protein is derived from natural, synthetic, or semi-synthetic processes. The protein may also be derived from recombinant DNA technology and may be isolated from cell-culture processes, as well as from transgenic plants and animals. Examples of proteins include albumins, collagens, and gelatins. Cross-linkers employed as part of the implantable material precursors include aldehydes, polyaldehydes, esters, and other chemical functionality suitable for cross-linking protein(s). Examples of homobifunctional cross-linking agents are described in “Bioconjugate Techniques” by G. T. Hermanson.
Materials of the invention, e.g., the cross-linked protein adhesives and heat-treated glutaraldehyde glues, when subjected to a swell test, have values in a percentile range lower than 100. To determine the swell test value, the material is placed in water and allowed to hydrate. The hydrated material is then weighed. Following the step of weighing the hydrated material, the hydrated material is then dried (e.g. by heating) and weighed again to determine a dry weight. The ratio of these two weights (hydrated vs. dry) comprises the result of the swell test and indicates how much moisture a material can take on in a percentage of its weight. Thus, for example, most non-glutaraldehyde glues typically have a swell test of 100-150%, which makes the glue come apart in a moist environment. Fibrin based glues have an even higher swell test value. Cross-linked albumin based glues of this invention have a lower swell test value which enables the glues to perform well in moist environments, with a swell test value ranging from −50% to 100%.
The implant components, including the cross-linking agent and the substrate, can be formulated at a pH in the range of 5-10 by adjusting the pH and/or by adding suitable buffers in the range of 1-500 mM. Examples of buffers include phosphate, carbonate, bicarbonate, borate, or imidazole, or mixtures thereof. Additionally, additives or stabilizers may be added to improve the stability of one or more of the components. Furthermore, imaging agents may be added to allow for detection of the material. Such agents include iodine, iodine compounds, metals such as gadolinium, radioisotopes, and other compounds for gamma scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, fluoroscopy, CT, SPECT and other imaging modalities. Additionally, the material may be formulated such that the mechanical properties are suitable for applications in the specific tissue to which the implantable material is applied. Such properties include elasticity, modulus, stiffness, brittleness, strain, cohesion, adhesion, and stress. Agents for modifying the properties include fillers, plasticizers, and adhesion modifiers. Furthermore, the implant may induce a natural adhesive mechanism with or without the addition of chemical agents which may be added to the implant to induce a natural response. Such agents include particles in the range of 100 nm to 1 millimeter. Agents include chemical or biochemical agents (proteins or nucleic acids) that induce a natural response. Examples of such agents include bleomycin, cytokines and chemokines, and single stranded RNA molecules.
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to use bioabsorbable sealants that expand or swell in the presence of aqueous fluids such as biological fluids. A commonly used sealant of this type includes both natural and synthetic hydrogels. Synthetic hydrogels can be prepared from the following classes of polymers and these are generally considered to be non-biodegradable: poly (hydroxyalkyl methylacrylates) such as poly(glyceryl methacrylate)poly(acrylamide) and poly(methacrylamide) and derivativespoly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone)anionic and cationic hydrogelspoly(vinyl alcohol)poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate and derivatives from block copolymers composed of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) blocks, respectively. All of these materials can be cross-linked with agents such as ethylene glycol dimethacrylate or methylene-bis-acrylamide. Biodegradable synthetic hydrogels can be prepared from polymers such as those listed above by incorporating one or more of the following monomers: Glycolide, Lactide, e-Caprolactone, p-Dioxanone and Trimethylene Carbonateln addition. Exemplary hydrogels based on natural products include polypeptides such as gelatin and polysaccharide such as starch and dextran. These natural products can be further processed by cross-linking with formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and various other dialdehydes.
The biologically compatible sealant of the present invention may also comprise a detectable label. The detectable labels suitable for use in the present invention include any composition detectable by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, electrical, optical or chemical means. A wide variety of appropriate detectable labels are known in the art, which include luminescent labels, radioactive isotope labels, and enzymatic labels. In preferred embodiments, one will likely desire to employ a fluorescent dye or label. These exemplary labels may be incorporated by a number of means well known to those of skill in the art. For instance, the label can be mixed with the sealant. Alternatively, labels can be chemically conjugated to the sealant molecules.
The use of a detectable label is particularly desirable for imaging the pleural region. The specific imaging means will depend on the particular type of label being used. For instance, radioactive labels can be detected by X-ray imaging. Fluorescent labels can be detected by an array of fluoroscopic equipment commonly employed by artisans in the field.
Ideally the composition of the sealant enables it to perform in a wet tissue environment. As is known in the art and discussed above, fibrin glue alone does not operate well in a wet environment and has been abandoned for use in many medical applications because of its inability to perform in a wet environment. The sealants used herein, in combination with the devices and methods, provide high adhesion in a wet environment. The adhesion of the sealant is beyond a low threshold that fibrin provides in wet tissue.
In determining an appropriate sealant to use with the devices and methods, two pieces of thin collagen based tissue (e.g. 1 inch wide by 2 inches long) are submerged into water (H2O) or saline. The glue or sealant to be tested is then applied to the surface of one of the pieces and the two pieces are placed together in the water bath. The testing environment and materials are maintained at 67-69° F. The glue or sealant joint between the two layers of collagen is formed within 2 minutes of removing the tissue from the fluid without benefit of drying. The test section is 1 square inch of overlapped tissue that is glued with the excess tissue extending out both ends so that the two pieces can be gripped independently. The ends are gripped and pulled in opposite directions to test the force to shear the 1 inch section apart. The result is measured as shear stress or shear pressure and is recorded as pounds force per unit area. Currently available fibrin glues tested using this method fail at approximately 0.0-0.2 pounds force per square inch. Sealants and glues with a composition suitable for this invention fail at levels above 0.2 to well above 3.0 depending on the formulation.
In determining an appropriate sealant to use in another embodiment, the sealant is tested for biocompatibility based on MEM Elusion tests and the Agar Overlay tests.
In the MEM Elusion test, solids with uniform surface area and thickness of around <0.5 mm: 120 cm2, solids with uniform surface area and thickness >0.5 mm: 60 cm2, solids without uniform surface area of 4 grams, or liquids up to 10 mL are tested. The samples are extracted in a serum-supplemented mammalian cell culture media (MEM). Extractions may be performed in 0.9% saline or cell culture media without serum if desired. Samples are then extracted for 24-25 hours at 37±1° C. in 5±1% CO2. The extracts are then filtered and placed in contact with a monolayer of L-929 cells (mouse fibroblasts). The cells are incubated at 37±2° C. in 5±1% CO2 for 48±3 hours, 72±3 hours or whatever incubation time is desired. The cells are then scored for cytopathic effect. The L929 cell line is the most commonly used for the test, however, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, other cell lines may be suitable as well.
Agar Overlay tests typically are used for solids of 300 mm2 or 300 mg and liquids of 3 mL. In the Agar Overlay test, a layer of agarose mixed with cell culture media is placed on top of a monolayer of L929 cells (mouse fibroblasts). The samples are placed on top of the agar layer. The cells are incubated for a minimum of 24 hours at 37±1° C. in 5±1% CO2. The cells are scored for cytopathic effect. The L929 cell line is most commonly used for testing. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, other cell lines can be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
Using either the MEM Elusion test or the Agar Overlay test result, the sealant should have a cytotoxicity, on a scale from 0-4, of 0 or 1, even if the sealant has glutaraldehyde to improve adhesion in the composition.
The amount of pharmacologically active ingredient administered and the dosing regimen used will, of course, be dependent on the particular drug selected, the age and general condition, or the pharmacological condition of the subject being treated, the severity of the subject's condition, and the judgment of the prescribing physician.
The above descriptions with reference to certain illustrated embodiments and certain exemplary practices are provided as a guide to a practitioner of ordinary skill in the art, and are not meant to be limiting in any way.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/586,887, filed Jul. 8, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3527841 | Wicker, Jr. et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3559652 | Banitt et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3722599 | Robertson et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3940362 | Overhults | Feb 1976 | A |
3995641 | Kronenthal et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4013080 | Froning | Mar 1977 | A |
4153058 | Nehme | May 1979 | A |
4233984 | Walling | Nov 1980 | A |
4418052 | Wong | Nov 1983 | A |
4479792 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4532935 | Wang | Aug 1985 | A |
4656254 | Shearer et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4702260 | Wang | Oct 1987 | A |
4739760 | Chin et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4766906 | Wang | Aug 1988 | A |
4769017 | Fath et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4880015 | Nierman | Nov 1989 | A |
5008245 | Digenis et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011686 | Pang | Apr 1991 | A |
5024829 | Berger et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5056529 | de Groot | Oct 1991 | A |
5084012 | Kelman | Jan 1992 | A |
5108368 | Hammerslag et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5162307 | Digenis et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165420 | Strickland | Nov 1992 | A |
5186167 | Kolobow | Feb 1993 | A |
5190546 | Jervis | Mar 1993 | A |
5219895 | Kelman | Jun 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5261889 | Laine et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5283173 | Fields et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292362 | Bass et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312329 | Beaty et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312331 | Knoepfler | May 1994 | A |
5315992 | Dalton | May 1994 | A |
5328687 | Leung et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334183 | Wuchinich | Aug 1994 | A |
5354287 | Wacks | Oct 1994 | A |
5385606 | Kowanko | Jan 1995 | A |
5423830 | Schneebaum et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5478925 | Wallach et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484401 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514371 | Leung et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514372 | Leung et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514536 | Taylor | May 1996 | A |
5526821 | Jamshidi | Jun 1996 | A |
5549904 | Juergensen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5575997 | Leung et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582834 | Leung et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583114 | Barrows et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599294 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5660175 | Dayal | Aug 1997 | A |
5660185 | Shmulewitz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663299 | Remold-O'Donnell | Sep 1997 | A |
5667973 | Fields et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5697365 | Pell | Dec 1997 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5736132 | Juergensen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739288 | Edwardson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5750657 | Edwardson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5827672 | Remold-O'Donnell | Oct 1998 | A |
5846235 | Pasricha et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5916210 | Winston | Jun 1999 | A |
5916212 | Baust et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928611 | Leung | Jul 1999 | A |
5938635 | Kuhle | Aug 1999 | A |
5954636 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957919 | Laufer | Sep 1999 | A |
5964770 | Flomenblit et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972026 | Laufer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978697 | Maytal et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981621 | Clark et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010714 | Leung et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6080113 | Heneveld et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083255 | Laufer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087325 | Meers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6174323 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183498 | DeVore et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200333 | Laufer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6258100 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267732 | Heneveld et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273907 | Laufer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283988 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283989 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287290 | Perkins et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287304 | Eggers et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293951 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299633 | Laufer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310036 | Browdie | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310166 | Hickey et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312428 | Eggers et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315737 | Skinner | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328689 | Gonzalez et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328701 | Terwilliger | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329337 | Morita et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6352716 | Janoff et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372229 | Ollerenshaw et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375926 | Barnes et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379373 | Sawhney et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387044 | Tachibana et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390967 | Forman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398775 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402701 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402754 | Gonzalez | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411852 | Danek et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416554 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443944 | Doshi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447534 | Cragg et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464648 | Nakamura | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478730 | Bala et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485407 | Alferness et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485436 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488673 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491706 | Alferness et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494844 | Van Bladel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494896 | D'Alessio et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494897 | Sterman et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500461 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6509031 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512023 | Malofsky et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514290 | Loomas | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6514522 | Domb | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527761 | Soltesz et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537195 | Forman | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537314 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540694 | Van Bladel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540716 | Holm | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549800 | Atalar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551255 | Van Bladel et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551302 | Rosinko et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552172 | Marx et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558337 | Dvorak et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565842 | Sojomihardjo et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6568387 | Davenport et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569166 | Gonzalez | May 2003 | B2 |
6577893 | Besson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585639 | Kotmel et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589161 | Corcoran | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592559 | Pakter et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592594 | Rimbaugh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599311 | Biggs et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610043 | Ingenito | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622731 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629951 | Laufer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632222 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632239 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632243 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634363 | Danek et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638275 | McGaffigan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652516 | Gough | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652520 | Moorman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653525 | Ingenito et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663624 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679264 | Deem et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682520 | Ingenito | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685626 | Wironen | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689072 | Kaplan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6690976 | Fenn et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692494 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6694979 | Deem et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695791 | Gonzalez | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709401 | Perkins et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709408 | Fisher | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709456 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712812 | Roschak et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716180 | Fontenot | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723095 | Hammerslag | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730044 | Stephens et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734006 | Xiao et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736822 | McClellan et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749606 | Keast et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752767 | Turovskiy et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752812 | Truwit | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753164 | Ni et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768425 | Flaherty et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770066 | Weaver et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6770070 | Balbierz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774216 | Ruben et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784153 | Rajotte et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789545 | Littrup et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790172 | Alferness et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790185 | Fisher et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6797001 | Mathis et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6807446 | Fenn et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6808525 | Latterell et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817973 | Merril et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825091 | Bae et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827086 | Shuman | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6830756 | Hnojewyj | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840243 | Deem et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840948 | Albrecht et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840952 | Saker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843767 | Corcoran et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849262 | Ollerenshaw et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852108 | Barry et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860847 | Alferness et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6863676 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875209 | Zvuloni et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6878106 | Herrmann | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6878141 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886558 | Tanaka | May 2005 | B2 |
6901927 | Deem et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902526 | Katzman | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902536 | Manna et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6904909 | Andreas et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908440 | Fisher | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918881 | Miller et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6936014 | Vetter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942627 | Huitema | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945942 | Van Bladel et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962587 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964662 | Kidooka | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967673 | Ozawa et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20010031948 | Cruise et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047187 | Milo et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007831 | Davenport et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022588 | Wilkie et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026188 | Balbierz et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042564 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042565 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062120 | Perkins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071843 | Li et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077593 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086842 | Plank et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086852 | Cantor et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091379 | Danek et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106411 | Wironen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111620 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112729 | DeVore et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128647 | Roschak et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138074 | Keast et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141966 | Dang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147462 | Mair et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161399 | Cruise et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176893 | Wironen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183244 | Ollerenshaw et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183838 | Liddicoat et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188171 | Alferness et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030017150 | Torphy | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018318 | Melsky | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029452 | Suki et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050648 | Alferness et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051733 | Kotmel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055331 | Kotmel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030064050 | Malik et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069488 | Alferness et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070676 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070682 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070683 | Deem et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030075170 | Deem et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083671 | Rimbaugh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100921 | Addis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109866 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113369 | Martin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127090 | Gifford et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130657 | Tom et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138481 | Zadi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154988 | DeVore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158515 | Gonzalez et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159700 | Laufer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181356 | Ingenito | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181922 | Alferness | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183235 | Rimbaugh et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191496 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194797 | Young et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195385 | DeVore | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195511 | Barry | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199440 | Dack et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212337 | Sirokman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212412 | Dillard et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216321 | Lawrence et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224430 | Xiao | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232019 | Basu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232048 | Yang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233099 | Danaek et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009122 | Klaveness et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009217 | Martin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010209 | Sirokman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010289 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024356 | Tanaka | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030262 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031494 | Danek et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038868 | Ingenito | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040555 | Tanaka | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043407 | Chen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047855 | Ingenito | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040048302 | Chen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049187 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052850 | Schankereli | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055606 | Hendricksen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059263 | DeVore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063613 | Rolke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040072756 | Wilkie et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073155 | Laufer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073191 | Soltesz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073201 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073241 | Barry et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078054 | Biggs et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081648 | Afeyan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081676 | Schankereli et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086896 | Carman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087778 | Feige et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106633 | Lu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120849 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120979 | Roessler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040121362 | Whitney et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124185 | Patel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040126777 | Bhatt et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133168 | Salcudean et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158228 | Perkins | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172058 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176801 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210248 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211434 | Loomas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220556 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225254 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231674 | Tanaka | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234575 | Horres et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237966 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244802 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244803 | Tanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004599 | McNally-Heintzelman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015106 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043751 | Phan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043752 | Phan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049615 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060041 | Phan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060042 | Phan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050061322 | Freitag | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085801 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096529 | Cooper et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107783 | Tom et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119614 | Mesky | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050281739 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281740 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281796 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281797 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281798 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281799 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281800 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281801 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281802 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282748 | Gong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288549 | Mathis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288550 | Mathis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288684 | Aronson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288702 | McGurk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004400 | McGurk et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009748 | Mathis | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025815 | McGurk et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060167416 | Mathis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070221230 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0367514 | May 1990 | EP |
0529719 | Mar 1993 | EP |
1070049 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1378518 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1433486 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2840796 | Dec 2003 | FR |
2324729 | Jan 2002 | GB |
WO 9610418 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9964446 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0013592 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0017227 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0113839 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0200270 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0200275 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0202158 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02072751 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02072769 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02072788 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 03010327 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03064639 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03077768 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03090682 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004001060 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004020620 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004031235 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004031253 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004045634 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004052236 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053117 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004054556 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004062505 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004086977 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060009801 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60586887 | Jul 2004 | US |