The present invention relates generally to phase locked loops used as frequency synthesizers, and more particularly, to phase-locked loop that operate to reduce acquisition time.
More and more communication systems support multiple standards and protocols. These systems rely on compressed operating modes that divide timing frames into sub periods and assign these periods to different protocols. The sub periods allow probing and setting up of new communication links. These require an advanced radio transceiver and, more often than not, duplicate frequency synthesizers to support fast switching.
Frequency synthesizers based on phase-locked loops (PLL) use a feedback loop to create an agile, low-noise signal. The feedback loop helps to minimize noise in track mode but tends to increase the switching time in acquisition mode, making it difficult to optimize the phase-locked loop's overall performance. As such, it would therefore be advantageous to adjust the parameters associated with the phase-locked loop and optimize them according to its mode of operation.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus capable of reducing the switching and settling time of a phase-locked loop, thereby enabling its performance to be optimized for a variety of applications.
In one aspect the present invention relates to a divider apparatus for use within a phase-locked loop having an output terminal at which an output frequency is produced. The apparatus includes a prescalar circuit configured to produce a prescaled signal by dividing the output frequency in accordance with a defined divider value. The prescalar circuit includes at least a resynchronization element and a prescalar front-end configured to generate an intermediate signal characterized by a 50% duty cycle. The apparatus further includes a first programmable counter operatively connected to an output of the prescalar circuit, and a second programmable counter disposed to receive the prescaled signal and to produce a divided signal utilized within the phase-locked loop.
In another aspect the present invention pertains to a divider apparatus for use within a phase-locked loop having an output terminal at which an output frequency is produced. The apparatus includes a prescalar circuit configured to produce a prescaled signal by dividing the output frequency in response to a mode select signal. A first programmable counter is disposed to receive the prescaled signal and to produce the mode select signal. In addition, a second programmable counter is disposed to receive the prescaled signal and to produce a divided signal utilized by the phase-locked loop. The apparatus further includes a control circuit connected to the first programmable counter and to the second programmable counter, the control circuit providing a first resynchronization signal to the first programmable counter and a second resynchronization signal to the second programmable counter.
In yet another aspect the present invention is directed to a signal frequency division method for use within a phase-locked loop having an output terminal at which an output frequency is produced. The method includes dividing the output frequency in accordance with a defined divider value so as to produce a prescaled signal wherein the dividing includes generating, in accordance with a mode select signal, an intermediate signal characterized by a 50% duty cycle. The method further includes generating the mode select signal based upon the prescaled signal. Counting operations are performed using the prescaled signal so as to produce a divided signal utilized within the phase-locked loop.
The present invention also generally relates to a phase-locked loop module having a voltage-controlled oscillator for generating an output signal of a frequency determined by a control voltage. A divider circuit divides the output signal to produce a frequency-divided signal, the divider including a prescalar circuit configured to produce a prescaled signal by dividing the frequency of the output signal in accordance with a defined divider value wherein the prescalar circuit includes at least a resynchronization element and a prescalar front-end configured to generate an intermediate signal characterized by a 50% duty cycle. The module further includes a phase/frequency detector disposed to compare phases between an input reference signal and the frequency-divided signal and to produce a phase error signal. A charge pump circuit produces a charge pump signal in response to the phase error signal. A loop filter then produces the control voltage in response to the charge pump signal.
Another aspect of the invention is directed to a phase-locked loop module having a voltage-controlled oscillator for generating an output signal of a frequency determined by a control voltage. A divider circuit divides the output signal to produce a frequency-divided signal, the divider including a prescalar circuit configured to produce a prescaled signal by dividing the frequency of the output signal, a first programmable counter and a second programmable counter connected to an output of the prescalar circuit, and a control circuit operatively coupled to the first programmable counter and the second programmable counter. The module further includes a phase/frequency detector disposed to compare phases between an input reference signal and the frequency-divided signal and to produce a phase error signal. A charge pump circuit produces a charge pump signal in response to the phase error signal. A loop filter then produces the control voltage in response to the charge pump signal.
For a better understanding of the nature of the features of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
A conventional phase-locked loop (PLL) used to synthesize signals at radio frequencies is shown in
The phase-locked loop incorporates feedback that minimizes the phase difference between a very accurate reference signal and the output signal. It operates to generate an output signal at a frequency given by
fVCO=NfREF
where fvco is the frequency of the output signal produced by the VCO, N is the value of the feedback counter, and fREF is the frequency of the reference signal. Note that the frequency resolution or equivalently the minimum frequency step (Δf) is simply fREF for an integer-N phase-locked loop.
A mathematical model of the PLL is shown in
vout(t)=Ac cos(ωfreet+Kvco∫vctrl(t)dt)
where ωfree is the free-running frequency of the oscillator and Kvco is its associated gain. The gain Kvco describes the relationship between the excess phase of the carrier Φout(s) and the control voltage vctrl
where Kvco is in rads/V. The N counter simply divides the output phase Φout(s) by N. When the phase-locked loop is locked, the phase detector and charge pump circuits generate an output signal iCP(s) that is proportional to the phase difference Δθ between its two input signals (the reference signal REF and the divider output signal DIV). The signal iCP(s) shifts positive to advance the VCO frequency and phase while it shifts negative to slow the VCO signal. The output signal iCP(s) can therefore be expressed as
where Kpd is in A/radians and Δθ is in radians. A simple integration filter, consisting of resistor R1 and capacitors C1-C2 as shown in
where a zero (at 1/R1C1) has been added to stabilize the second order system and the capacitor C2 has been included to reduce any ripple on the output voltage. Combining the above relations yields the composite open-loop transfer function
which has two poles at the origin (due to the voltage-controlled oscillator and the integration filter). This system is referred to as a type II phase-locked loop.
The open-loop transfer function GH(s) is used to analyze the stability of the feedback loop. Its magnitude and phase response—shown in FIG. 4—indicate the phase margin of the system. Ideally, the phase margin approaches 45°, providing a loop with adequate stability while minimizing acquisition time.
The closed-loop response of the system is simply
which shows the zero and two complex poles. Not surprisingly, both the open-loop and closed-loop responses of the phase-locked loop depend on the integration filter components (R1, C1-C2), the charge pump current ICP, and the gain of the voltage-controlled oscillator, Kvco. Mapping the denominator of the above expression to the characteristic equation of a second order system reveals
s2NR1C1C2+s[N(C1+C2)+KPDKVCOR1C1]+KPDKVCO=s2+2ζωns+ωn2
with the critical frequency ωn equal to
and the damping factor ζ given by
Note that the damping factor is usually set to 0.707—the condition for critical damping and 45° phase margin.
The step response of the PLL second order system in essence determines the acquisition time tacq of the frequency synthesizer. As such, it depends on the above PLL parameters (ωn and ζ) as well as the programmed step size (Δf) and required settling accuracy (α), with
where fVCO is the initial frequency. From this relationship it's clear that the critical frequency ωn sets the PLL's settling time. It follows then that to reduce settling time, the critical frequency must be increased. This can be accomplished by increasing the charge pump current iCP, reducing the R1C1 product, reducing N, or any combination thereof.
The step response of the phase-locked loop and the corresponding switching behavior are both dynamic and discrete. This is primarily due to the phase/frequency detector. It compares the reference signal REF and N counter output signal DIV. (Note the N counter essentially divides the phase of the VCO signal.) In practice, the N counter is a swallow counter such as the one shown in
N=A(P+1)+(B−A)P
which simplifies to
N=BP+A
The architecture of the swallow counter allows the value of N to change in steps of one via the A counter value.
The dual-modulus prescalar is formed using a divide-by-2/divide-by-3 front-end and-successive divide-by-2 stages as shown in
With the mode input HI, the AND gate is forced to follow the output of FF2. The resulting signal is delayed by FF1 (by one clock cycle) to keep the output of the NOR gate LO for two clock cycles. As a result, the output of FF2 pulses HI every third cycle of the clock signal and lacks symmetry as seen in the timing diagram of
To operate properly, the phase/frequency detector triggers only on the leading edges of REF and DIV signals to generate an output signal proportional to their phase difference Δθ. This allows a digital circuit such as the one shown in
The UP and DN pulses drive the charge pump circuit and feed the integration filter shown in
The charge pump sources or sinks charge (iCPΔt) to or from the integration filter and thereby moves the control voltage vctrl applied to the VCO. This in turn shifts the frequency and phase of the VCO until the phase of the DIV signal (output of the N counter) aligns with the phase of the reference signal REF. Note that it takes a finite time to accumulate enough charge to move the control voltage appropriately.
The charge pump directs charge to or from the integration filter with each UP and DN pulse created by the phase/frequency detector. In practice, these pulses align with the leading edge of the reference and divided signals (REF and DIV).
The inventive PLL system shown in
At the heart of the novel N counter is a new prescalar front-end with 50% duty cycle. It's shown in
A detailed view of the divide-by-2 circuit with selectable delay is shown in
A variation on the prescalar front-end with 50% duty cycle is shown in
The output of the prescalar front-end drives multiple divide-by-2 stages that form the A and B counters. The half-cycle delay permits the prescalar to generate an output signal triggered by either edge of the VCO—even for odd values of P. The resynchronization flip-flop aligns the output signal to the input clock signal and thereby removes the delay variation of the prescalar to reduce system phase noise. The PMOD signal depends on the value of P—it's pulsed for each sequence of the prescalar when P is odd (to achieve the half-cycle delay).
The A and B counters typically consist of programmable flip-flops that decrement to zero such as the one shown in
A modified counter capable of triggering off either clock edge (prescalar output) is shown in
Using both clock edges makes the system more complicated and requires a control circuit to track the active edge for the A and B counters. With both A and B even, the leading edge always resynchronizes the output as expected. With only A odd, resynchronization always occurs on the trailing edge to create the half-cycle delay. This is because the B counter starts and terminates on the leading edge. Since the A counter starts at the same instant as the B counter, the trailing edge always corresponds to a half-cycle delay. With only B odd, a simple control circuit toggles the active edge of both the A and B resynchronization flip-flops. This happens because the start time of the B counter (and consequently, the A counter) alternates between the leading and trailing edges. With both A and B odd, the control circuit toggles only the B counter resynchronization signal. The behavior of this control circuit is summarized in Table 1 and is implemented with some simple, low-speed logic.
a and 13b respectively illustrate the PLL settling response with a typical phase/frequency detector and with the innovative PLL system designed for dual-edge sensitivity. The acquisition time is literally halved by the modifications to the feedback counter and phase/frequency detector. In effect, detecting both edges of the VCO signal reduces N to
which simplifies to
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. In other instances, well-known circuits and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessary distraction from the underlying invention. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed; obviously many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the following Claims and their equivalents define the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/657,833, entitled PLL WITH DUAL EDGE SENSITIVITY, filed Mar. 1, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,856,205, entitled VCO WITH AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4263560 | Ricker | Apr 1981 | A |
4430627 | Machida | Feb 1984 | A |
4769588 | Panther | Sep 1988 | A |
4816772 | Klotz | Mar 1989 | A |
4926135 | Voorman | May 1990 | A |
4965531 | Riley | Oct 1990 | A |
5006818 | Koyama et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015968 | Podell et al. | May 1991 | A |
5030923 | Arai | Jul 1991 | A |
5289136 | DeVeirman et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5331292 | Worden et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5399990 | Miyake | Mar 1995 | A |
5491450 | Helms et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5508660 | Gersbach et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5548594 | Nakamura | Aug 1996 | A |
5561385 | Choi | Oct 1996 | A |
5581216 | Ruetz | Dec 1996 | A |
5631587 | Co et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648744 | Prakash et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5677646 | Entrikin | Oct 1997 | A |
5739730 | Rotzoll | Apr 1998 | A |
5767748 | Nakao | Jun 1998 | A |
5818303 | Oishi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834987 | Dent | Nov 1998 | A |
5862465 | Ou | Jan 1999 | A |
5878101 | Aisaka | Mar 1999 | A |
5880631 | Sahota | Mar 1999 | A |
5939922 | Umeda | Aug 1999 | A |
5945855 | Momtaz | Aug 1999 | A |
5949286 | Jones | Sep 1999 | A |
5990740 | Groe | Nov 1999 | A |
5994959 | Ainsworth | Nov 1999 | A |
5999056 | Fong | Dec 1999 | A |
6011437 | Sutardja et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018651 | Bruckert et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031425 | Hasegawa | Feb 2000 | A |
6044124 | Monahan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052035 | Nolan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057739 | Crowley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060935 | Shulman | May 2000 | A |
6091307 | Nelson | Jul 2000 | A |
6100767 | Sumi | Aug 2000 | A |
6114920 | Moon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6163207 | Kattner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173011 | Rey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191956 | Foreman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204728 | Hageraats | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211737 | Fong | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229374 | Tammone, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246289 | Pisati et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255889 | Branson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259321 | Song et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288609 | Brueske et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298093 | Genrich | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333675 | Saito | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370372 | Molnar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392487 | Alexanian | May 2002 | B1 |
6404252 | Wilsch | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6476660 | Visocchi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515553 | Filiol et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6559717 | Lynn et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560448 | Baldwin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571083 | Powell, II et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577190 | Kim | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583671 | Chatwin | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583675 | Gomez | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6639474 | Asikainen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6664865 | Groe et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683509 | Albon et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693977 | Katayama et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703887 | Groe | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711391 | Walker et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724235 | Costa et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734736 | Gharpurey | May 2004 | B2 |
6744319 | Kim | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751272 | Burns et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6753738 | Baird | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763228 | Prentice et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774740 | Groe | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777999 | Kanou et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781425 | Si | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795843 | Groe | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798290 | Groe et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801089 | Costa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6845139 | Gibbons | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856205 | Groe | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870411 | Shibahara et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6917791 | Chadwick | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6940356 | McDonald, II et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943600 | Craninckx | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975687 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985703 | Groe et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990327 | Zheng et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7062248 | Kuiri | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065334 | Otaka et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7088979 | Shenoy et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7123102 | Uozumi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142062 | Vaananen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7148764 | Kasahara et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171170 | Groe et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215215 | Hirano et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20020071497 | Bengtsson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020193009 | Reed | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030078016 | Groe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092405 | Groe et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030118143 | Bellaouar et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030197564 | Humphreys et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040017852 | Redman-White | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040051590 | Perrott et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050093631 | Groe | May 2005 | A1 |
20050099232 | Groe et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60657833 | Mar 2005 | US |