1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to flow control devices for establishing temporary obstructions within a tubing string. In certain aspects, the invention also relates to devices and methods for pressure testing of production tubing within a hydrocarbon production well or for operating hydraulic tools within a tubing string.
2. Description of the Related Art
After a production well is drilled, cased, and, if required perforated, a string of production tubing is run into the cased wellbore. Hydrocarbons from a downhole formation are then drawn into the production tubing, under impetus of a surface-based pump, and brought to the surface of the well. After the production tubing is run into the wellbore, it is desirable to test the pressure integrity of the tubing before drawing production fluid from the formation. Leaks in the production tubing string result in inefficient production and can be costly to repair after production has begun.
In order to pressure test the production tubing, it is necessary to create a temporary plug or obstruction within the tubing string. Fluid is then introduced above the obstruction and pressurized so that any leakage can be detected. After testing, the obstruction must be removed from the tubing string. In other instances, it may be desirable to establish a temporary obstruction within the tubing string in order to actuate a hydraulic tool within the tubing string above the obstruction.
Unfortunately, current temporary plug flow control devices are problematic or less than reliable in practice. U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,696 issued to Jeffree et al. describes a rupture disk arrangement wherein a rupture disk, typically formed of nickel, is incorporated into the tubing string prior to running the tubing string into the wellbore. This type of device is also known commercially as a “well test membrane.” This arrangement is unsatisfactory for some purposes since it does not allow passage of fluid or tools through the tubing string while the tubing string is being tripped into the wellbore. The intact rupture disk prevents such passage.
The Model E Hydro Trip pressure sub, by Baker Oil Tools, is another flow control device that is used to establish a temporary blockage within a tubing string. This device uses collet fingers to provide a restricted-diameter ball seat upon which a plugging ball is seated to establish a fluid blockage. Upon the application of a predetermined amount of pressure within the tubing string above the plugging ball, several shear screws are sheared, permitting a sleeve within the tubing string to slide downwardly within the flowbore so that the collet fingers can retract back into a matching recess in the flowbore wall, thereby allowing the plugging ball to fall into the well sump below and result in an unplugged condition. This device may malfunction if the shear screws do not shear at the intended fluid pressure, or do not all shear at the same time, thereby causing the sliding sleeve to become stuck or to slide prematurely. In addition, this arrangement can only be used a single time. Once the shear screws have been sheared, no other plugging ball will be supported upon the ball seat unless the tubing string is first removed from the wellbore and then reset. This, of course, is costly and time consuming.
Also known is a shear-out ball seat sub that provides a temporary blockage of a portion of the tubing string when a ball-shaped plug is dropped into a tubing string and then seated upon a seating arrangement that is provided by a frangible member. The blockage is later removed by shearing away a frangible member to allow the plug to drop into the well sump. Unfortunately, this type of arrangement can only be located at the lower end of the tubing string and no other points along the tubing string, thereby limiting its usefulness. This arrangement, of course, is also limited to a single use.
The present invention addresses the problems of the prior art.
The invention provides devices and methods for fluid flow control within a production tubing string wherein a temporary flow blockage is established and selectively removed from the tubing string so that pressure testing or operation of a hydraulic tool within the string may be performed. The flow control device does not require frangible members, such as shear screws to operate and may be reusable. Fluids and tools may be passed through the device as the device is tripped in.
In an exemplary embodiment, the flow control device includes a housing that defines a flowbore therethrough with a restricted diameter portion. The restricted diameter portion presents a seating surface for a plug member and is provided by an annular shell that is shaped to project convexly inwardly. The shell may be fashioned of metal, elastomer or another suitable material, and it is capable of yielding to permit passage of a plug member upon application of a suitably great amount of fluid pressure. In operation, a plugging member is dropped in to the tubing string from the surface of the well and seats upon the seating surface. The tubing string is then pressured up to a first fluid pressure level for testing, tool operation, or the like, and the pressuring up will urge the plugging member against the plug seat in order to effect a fluid seal.
When it is desired to remove the plugging member from the tubing string, and reestablish fluid flow through the tubing string, fluid pressure above the plugging member is raised to a second, overpressure level. The plug is then urged through the restricted diameter portion and expelled from the device to the wellbore sump below.
The production tubing string 18 is made up of a series of individual tubing sections 22, which are affixed to one another by threading, as is known in the art. The tubing string 18 also includes a plug and expel device 24 that is constructed in accordance with the present invention.
The structure and operation of the plug and expel device 24 is better appreciated with reference to
The shell 38 is secured within the flowbore 32 by press fitting, such as cryogenic fitting, or by other methods known in the art. As is apparent from
In operation, the plug and expel device 24 is integrated into the string of production tubing 18 and then run into the wellbore 12. Fluids and tools are able to pass through the tubing string 18 and the flowbore 32 of the plug and expel device 24, as necessary. Once the production tubing string 18 is run in so that the device 24 is disposed at a desired depth, the tubing string 18 can be prepared for testing by dropping the tripping ball 36, or other suitable plugging member, into the tubing string 18 from the surface 20. The ball 36 will become seated upon the seating surface 46. The tubing string 18 may then be pressure tested by increasing fluid pressure within the tubing string 18 at the surface and, as a result, above the ball 36. The fluid pressure is increased only to a first level, which is suitable for pressure testing the tubing string 18 but not sufficient to dislodge the ball 36 from the restricted throat portion 34 of the flow control device 24. Those of skill in the art will recognize that, in lieu of pressure testing of the tubing string 18, the pressure might also be increased within the tubing string 18 in order to operate a hydraulic tool, inflate a packer, or the like.
Upon application of a predetermined overpressure, the tripping ball 36 will be urged through the restricted throat portion 34 and fall into the sump (not shown) at the bottom of the well 10. The shell 38 is elastically deformed by the tripping ball 36 and portions of the shell 38 will yield by moving radially outwardly to accommodate passage of the ball 36. The ball 36 is thereby expelled from the flow control device 24 and will then drop into the sump (not shown) at the bottom of the wellbore 12.
It is noted that the flow control device 24 may also be reused after the ball 36 has been expelled from the restricted throat 34 since the shell 38 will tend to return to its undeformed shape, thereby again presenting the seating surface 46 for a second tripping ball 36 to be landed thereupon. The second tripping ball 36 may be selectively expelled from the device 24 in the manner described previously. The reuseable nature of the device 24 is highly advantageous since it permits, for example, pressure tests to be performed after some period of production operation.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the exemplary designs and embodiments described herein and that the invention is limited only by the claims that follow and any equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2829719 | Clark, Jr. | Apr 1958 | A |
3054415 | Baker et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
4474241 | Freeman | Oct 1984 | A |
4566541 | Moussy et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4606408 | Zunkel et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4823882 | Stokley | Apr 1989 | A |
4828037 | Lindsey et al. | May 1989 | A |
4893678 | Stokley et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5146992 | Baugh | Sep 1992 | A |
5244044 | Henderson | Sep 1993 | A |
5413172 | Laurel | May 1995 | A |
5762142 | Connell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797454 | Hipp | Aug 1998 | A |
5890538 | Beirute et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5996696 | Jefree et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6102060 | Howlett et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
20010045288 | Allamon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020162261 | Krauss et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040262016 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |