This application is a National Stage Application of PCT/EP2007/006363, filed Jul. 18, 2007, which claims benefit of Ser. No. 10 2006 036 459.7, filed Aug. 4, 2006 in Germany and which application(s) are incorporated herein by reference. To the extent appropriate, a claim of priority is made to each of the above disclosed applications.
The invention relates to a plug-in connector for telecommunications and data technology.
Such plug-in connectors are, for example, RJ45 sockets or plugs, such a generic RJ45 socket being described in WO 02/15339.
Furthermore, DE 298 19 314 U1 has disclosed a socket-type plug-in connector having a dielectric plug-in connector housing and contacts arranged in the plug-in connector housing for the purpose of producing a connection with the contacts of an associated plug-in connector which has been inserted into an insertion opening in the plug-in connector housing, and having external connection contacts for the purpose of producing an electrical connection with the socket-type plug-in connector, having an arrangement for the purpose of DC-decoupling the contacts for the associated plug-in connector from the external connection contacts and having a filter device, an element being provided which can be inserted essentially completely into the plug-in connector housing and holds both the contacts for the associated plug-in connector and the external connection contacts, and in which both the arrangement for the DC-decoupling and the filter device are arranged. The arrangement for the DC-decoupling and the filter device comprise inductances which are formed by coils having a ferrite ring core, whose center axes are aligned in each case parallel to one another. Transformers for the DC-decoupling act as a bandpass filter, which is disadvantageous in particular in the case of broadband transmissions in accordance with CAT6 and 10 gigabit/s Ethernet applications.
In the case of CAT6 or 10 gigabit/s Ethernet applications, in addition to the known crosstalk effects within a plug-in connector, such as NEXT (near end crosstalk) and FEXT (far end crosstalk), there is an increased influence of the so-called ANEXT (alien near end crosstalk) or AFEXT (alien far end crosstalk) in adjacent plug-in connectors. The influence of the ANEXT or AFEXT increases severely at higher signal transmission rates. This AXT (alien crosstalk) comprises the direct AXT between the plug-in connectors and the indirect AXT via the differential mode to common mode conversion of the plug-in connector, the common-mode coupling between the connected cables and the common mode to differential mode conversion in the plug-in connector which is subjected to the interference.
The invention is therefore based on the technical problem of providing a plug-in connector for telecommunications and data technology, by means of which the influence of the AXT is reduced at high transmission rates of CAT6 or 10 gigabit/s Ethernet.
In this regard, in each case one common-mode filter arrangement is assigned to all of the core pairs. An interfering common-mode signal is thereby attenuated in pairs, with the result that this attenuated common-mode component does not lead to AXT in an adjacent plug-in connector. At the same time, the common-mode filter arrangement also attenuates injected common-mode signals from other plug-in connectors.
In one preferred embodiment, the common-mode filter arrangement is in the form of a common-mode inductor, which is arranged on a printed circuit board for the first and second contacts, the common-mode inductor preferably being in the form of an SMD component, which allows for a compact design. The common-mode inductor is in this case preferably electrically connected between the first and second contacts.
As an alternative or in addition, the common-mode arrangement can be in the form of a ferrite sleeve, a dedicated ferrite sleeve being assigned to each core pair, whereas an individual ferrite sleeve would have virtually no effect for the entire cable. The reason for this is the fact that the common-mode signals on the different core pairs do not necessarily have the same direction. The common-mode interference therefore needs to be reduced separately for each core pair.
Various embodiments are now possible for connecting the ferrite sleeves to the plug-in connector or the plug-in connector housing.
In one embodiment, the ferrite sleeves are in the form of a separate component and are fixed, for example latched or adhesively bonded, to the plug-in connector housing. In addition it is also possible to provide a separate ferrite sleeve holder which holds the ferrite sleeves, the ferrite sleeve holder itself being held by the housing of the plug-in connector or the cores. In this case, the ferrite sleeve holder is preferably designed such that the individual ferrite sleeves do not come into contact with one another and therefore magnetic couplings are avoided. In addition to the actual plug-in connector housing, the ferrite sleeves can also be arranged on a cable manager of the plug-in connector.
In one alternative embodiment, the plug-in connector housing and/or a retainer and/or a cable manager consists at least partially of a ferrite material or contains ferrite material. It is thus possible, for example, for a cable manager to consist completely of a ferrite material, the core pairs then being passed through said cable manager in their respectively associated segment. As an alternative, the ferrite sleeves can be encapsulated by injection molding in the plug-in connector housing. It is also possible to admix ferrite powder to the plastic injection molding material.
A common-mode filter arrangement preferably takes place in the case of a plug-in connection both on the plug side and on the socket side, but the respective design of the common-mode filter arrangement may be different.
The invention will be explained in more detail below with reference to a preferred exemplary embodiment. In the figures:
As can be seen in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 036 459 | Aug 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/006363 | 7/18/2007 | WO | 00 | 2/2/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/014891 | 2/7/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5069641 | Sakamoto et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5456619 | Belopolsky et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5587884 | Raman | Dec 1996 | A |
5628653 | Haas et al. | May 1997 | A |
5766043 | Talend | Jun 1998 | A |
5872492 | Boutros | Feb 1999 | A |
5971813 | Kunz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6062908 | Jones | May 2000 | A |
6102741 | Boutros et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6276943 | Boutros et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302741 | Fasold et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319064 | Belopolsky et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6579116 | Brennan et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6663411 | Little | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6837732 | Pavlovic et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6926558 | Sasai et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953362 | Mossner et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7348862 | Norte | Mar 2008 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 03 321 | Aug 1991 | DE |
195 00 295 | Jul 1996 | DE |
197 04 317 | Sep 1997 | DE |
298 19 314 | Apr 2000 | DE |
0 844 697 | May 1998 | EP |
WO 9747083 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 0215339 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 2006078760 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100003861 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |