The present invention concerns a plug connector according to the preamble of patent claim 1. Such plug connectors principally find application in airbag triggering systems.
The highest requirements are placed on the reliability of such plug connectors and the plug connections produced with them. On the one hand, these requirements involve their reliability over a long period of time and, on the other hand, undefined stress states on the trigger must be avoided in producing the plug connector. For example, it must be assured that, it is abundantly clear to the operator that the plug connector is correctly seated in its final position in the counter-plug, which is conventionally assured by a lock or a catch, and, on the other hand, it must be assured that this final position is not abandoned unintentionally when the vehicle is operated and in particular, during repair operations on the motor vehicle. This is achieved by a secondary lock, i.e., the locking of catch arms in their locked position, so that the plug connection can no longer by disengaged unintentionally.
Known plug connectors for airbag triggering systems, as are known, for example, from DE 125,295 A1 of the patent applicant, use secondary locks which can only be activated if the plug connector is already plugged into the corresponding counter-plug. That is, in the mounted position, the secondary lock is found locked in an intermediate position, from which it is brought into its final position after producing the plug connection with the counter-plug. The plug connector is thus delivered with a secondary lock in an intermediate position, whereby it may happen during delivery or in the handling of the plug connector that the secondary lock is found unintentionally already in its final position, as if the plug connection has been produced, but in this case, connection is prevented. The secondary lock can be disengaged again, but additional time is required and an optional automatically produced installation is made impossible. In addition, after the plug connection has been produced, one may forget to also lock the secondary lock, so that it cannot be excluded with certainty that the plug connection can be disengaged again.
The object of the invention is to extensively improve a plug connector of the given type, so that a secondary locking need no longer be made separately after the connection with a counter-plug has been made, but can be made simultaneously when the plug connector and counter-plug are connected.
This object is solved according to the claim.
Preferred configurations of the plug connector according to the invention are characterized in the subclaims. The principle of the present invention consists of the fact that the radial tilting movement of a locking tab by catching under the corresponding shoulder in the counter-plug is used for controlling the movement of secondary locking tabs, which are prestressed during the process of plugging in, so that when the locking tabs are locked in, the path is made free for the secondary locking tabs to move by their free ends behind the locking tabs in order to make impossible a disengagement of the locking tabs.
The invention will be explained in more detail in the following based on the description of embodiment examples with reference to the drawing, in which the following are shown:
a, 4b: the plugging-in process of the plug connector according to
a and 4b show the plugging-in process of plug connector 1 into a counter-plug 3. Only one inlet is shown of counter-plug 3, which is cut open in the region of the locking tabs 2, in order to show the plug part of the plug connector 1.
This bending of locking tabs 2 leads to the circumstance that projection 2d (see
In the locked state, i.e., plug connector 1 is completely plugged into counter-plug 3, the locking tabs 2 spring back again into their initial position, after they have projected over the (not shown) catching shoulder in counter-plug 3. Simultaneously, they again release the space 5 in the region of the free ends 4c, 4d of the secondary locking tabs 4a, 4b and thus a bearing surface is not longer offered, so that, due to the elastic bending of the secondary locking tabs 4a, 4b they spring behind the locking tabs 2 into space 5, as this is shown in
The preceding description of an example of embodiment of the present invention is not to be understood as limiting, but serves only for illustration of the invention defined in the claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102 24 757 | Jun 2002 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP03/05760 | 6/2/2003 | WO | 00 | 7/26/2004 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO03/103102 | 12/11/2003 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5275575 | Cahaly et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5314345 | Cahaly et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5720623 | Polenick et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 6004158 | Ward | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6705886 | Brown | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6811424 | Seminara et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6945801 | Brown | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 20010027043 | Shiraki et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020081888 | Regnier et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111060 | Challis et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1006621 | Apr 1957 | DE |
| 4317344 | Dec 1994 | DE |
| 4430358 | Apr 1995 | DE |
| 197 04 991 | Aug 1997 | DE |
| 19621616 | Dec 1997 | DE |
| 100 25 295 | Jan 2002 | DE |
| 1130692 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1207591 | May 2002 | EP |
| 2 310 087 | Jun 1997 | GB |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040248454 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |