The present patent application relates to a plug construction comprising a hydraulic crushing body as given in the preamble of the subsequent claim 1.
To use explosive charges to remove plugs that have been temporarily placed to close off a well, a drill hole or the like, is well known. As a rule, such an explosive charge is either placed on top of the inserted plug, but it can also in some cases be placed in the centre of the plug. Today many different mechanisms are used to trigger such explosive charges.
Today's systems with explosive charges leave behind unwanted residues and also the explosive charges constitute a potential risk for the user in the handling of the plug.
Also well known are solutions where one goes down into the well itself and crushes such plugs with mechanical effects, blows or drilling which do not involve explosive charges.
Also known is a solution where individual plug bodies are mounted in their separate seat in the plug, for example as disclosed in the International patent publication WO 2007/108701 (Bjoergum Mekaniske).
This solution is based on a non-compressible fluid being filled between each plug body which at a signal for opening is drained out into a separate atmospheric chamber. By draining this fluid out into the atmospheric chamber the plug elements shall collapse with the help of the hydrostatic pressure. However, if there is a leak in the atmospheric chamber, this would not function as the fluid can not be drained. Another disadvantage with this solution is that the plug construction must be weaker than one wants as it requires that the different plug bodies must be thin enough to rupture with the help of the well pressure only.
The aim of the present invention is to provide a method for removal of the plug without the use of explosives and which does not have the disadvantages described above.
Furthermore it is an aim of the invention to avoid the limitations which today's solutions without explosives place with regard to the plug construction, such as the thickness of the plug element and the risk of damage to the well formation with the opening under pressure higher than the hydrostatic pressure in the well.
The plug for carrying out tests of a well, a pipe or the like, is comprised of one or more plug bodies of a material able to disintegrate or crush, set up to rupture by an internally supplied effect, is characterised in that the plug comprises an internal hollow space designed to be in fluid connection with an external pressure exerting body, and the plug is set up to be blown apart by the supply of fluid to the internal hollow space so that the pressure in the hollow space exceeds an external pressure to a level so that the plug is blown apart.
The preferred embodiments of the invention appear in the dependent claims 2-16.
It is preferred that the plug is composed of one or more elements, i.e. two or more plug layers the one placed on top of the other. This composite plug element is then pressurised in the internal volume with the help of preferably an axially arranged circular piston which is released by a release mechanism.
The pressure which is created by this piston is preferably much higher than the well pressure and the plug will rupture as a consequence of the internal pressure.
This piston preferably functions in an integrated chamber in the wall section of the plug. This piston preferably has a larger piston area on the well side than on the side which pressurises the inner volume of the plug element.
This piston element is preferably inserted in the plug wall and held in place by a casing which also holds the plug element in place.
The plug elements have preferably a plane surface towards the well side and a gentle arch shape (concavity) is ground out towards the centre of the plug.
This weakness which the arch constitutes against pressure from the inside will preferably be of such type that one can control which of the plug elements which shall be ruptured.
It is also preferred that one can vary the thickness of the plug elements to have the same control over which plug element shall rupture when the plug is pressurised from the inside.
So called “squibs” (pyrotechnical units also found in airbags) can preferably be used which are electrically triggered to create the increased internal pressure which is required to crush/fracture the plug elements.
In a preferred embodiment, pre-compressed gas is used to drive a piston as described earlier. Alternatively, the compressed gas can be under pressure which in itself provides an effect large enough to crush and fracture the plug element when it is released directly into the controlled internal volume.
When such a system with hydraulic crushing is applied one avoids the problems of explosives and the associated safety risk. Also avoided are the remains of the housings of the explosives in the well. This will constitute a considerable improvement to be able to provide crushable plugs to all types of wells.
It is essential that the crushing occurs from a space or a volume established internal in the centre of the plug as this is a volume that can be controlled and pressurised to a much higher level than the rest of the pipe in which the plug is fitted. In testing, hydraulic crushing from the centre space provided very good results for glass and ceramic plugs.
The crushing system can be constructed so that it requires very little of the internal diameter (ID) of the plug and thus a good OD/ID ratio can be obtained. OD is a term for the external diameter. It is possible to make plugs with hydraulic crushing with a large ID without explosives for the crushing, something which is not possible today. Thereby, it is a considerable advantage to remove the explosive charges from the present systems, and replace them by a system that crushes the plug without use of these explosive charges.
A good effect is obtained in particular with glass and ceramic materials. These materials can be formed so that they can withstand a high pressure from one side and a low pressure from the other side. This is not problematic with respect to the strength of the plug as it will be crushed from the inside and after crushing of a body the remaining parts do not withstand much pressure before they rupture and these will then be easy to crush at a relatively low pressure from the well fluid.
The system will also be far cheaper to produce in that the expensive component which the explosives represent is omitted. As a consequence, transport and logistics will also be much simpler.
The solution according to the present invention functions in that a liquid fluid under a pressure is let into a hollow space between the different plug bodies or plug discs. Alternatively, this fluid under pressure is let into an adapted hollow space in an individual or single plug body. This pressure of the fluid can be provided via a hydraulic piston which works in a boring in the axial direction through the plug sleeve in that a pre-compressed gas in an accumulator chamber is released.
Alternatively, a pyrotechnic unit can be started to give a suitable strong pressure pulse to crush the plug element.
The hollow space is safeguarded with the help of gaskets protected against fluid pressure influences from the well side and the top side of the plug against pressure influences from the pump test operations from the rig. These gaskets are made so that they can withstand much higher fluid pressure than the plug bodies themselves. Thus, the fluid under pressure which shall be let in will only escape by crushing one or more plug bodies.
This pressure of the fluid can be created as the axially orientated piston is set up in a casing and has such a shape that the piston area is larger on the side of the plug that can be pressurised from either the well side of the plug or from the top side of the plug via a valve. The reduced piston area which functions against the internal hollow space of the plug bodies that are filled with a liquid when the hollow space is pressurised, will get an increased pressure in relation to the top side or the bottom side of the plug because of this area difference.
This increased fluid pressure creates a pressure difference between the internal pressure in between the plug bodies (discs) and the hydrostatic pressure on top of the plug bodies and also against the well pressure. When the plug bodies rupture as a consequence of this fluid pressure difference, it is possible with the help of fluid pressure from the rig applied to the top of the plug to rupture any plug bodies that are still intact as the plug body alone is not strong enough to withstand the maximum fluid pressure of the pipe in which the plug is fitted.
The number and thickness of the plug bodies placed one on top the other, are adjusted so that they can not withstand the maximum fluid pressure of the pipe as a single body. For plugs where an internal volume is constructed for crushing of an individual plug body, this internal volume of the plug body will be adapted so that the plug can withstand the maximum pressure from the top side and bottom side of the plug, but not from the inside. This can be achieved, for example, by grinding to form an internal roman bridge which brings the load force from externally supplied pressure out towards the outer edge of the plug body and thereby withstand pressure form the outside.
In this embodiment there is only one plug body and when this is crushed any residual parts of the plug can easily be forced out.
The movement of the piston is released by either an electric signal, ultrasound, acoustic signals or hydraulic pulses in a well which is received by a mechanical or electrical system.
The present solution also leads to a good solution with regard to the contingency opening of the plug as it does not contain explosives that can get lost.
In an alternative embodiment the gas can be compressed in advance to a given pressure so that this gas is released either directly into the hollow space in the plug or in at the top of the piston so that the required pressure is reached.
The desired pressure can also be created by electrically or mechanically starting a squib which is in connection with the hollow space between the plug bodies and will thereby increase the pressure to the level where at least one of the plug bodies rupture. The created hydraulic pressure from the squib can be used in the same way as for the gas, either directly into the hollow space or via a piston which can further increase the pressure.
With the present solution with explosives, there is always a risk that explosives can be left live (undetonated) in the well after use of “contingency”. Such plugs where explosives lie inside the plug material are thus a problem today and are not acceptable for the user, even if this risk is relatively small.
With the present solutions with several plug elements arranged on top of each other and liquid in between the elements the corresponding crushing effect can be obtained without the use of explosives.
This solution is based on the controlled liquid in between the plug elements not being able to be compressed and through this the uppermost plug element will get help to take the axial load in the system of the below-lying elements.
The disadvantage with this system is that it is subjected to potential damages in the upper plug element when the other elements are dropped into the well, as the uppermost plug element can not withstand a large mechanical load alone and is easily crushed. As a consequence, the plug will open up without control and at a wrong time. Furthermore, this system leads to a risk for possible leaks of liquid out between the plug elements something which will also lead to a premature opening of the plug.
In order to ensure that the plug ruptures after the liquid between the elements has drained out in a controlled fashion, the plug elements have to be so thick that they are crushed at moderate pressures. Such a solution is unwanted. Glass, which is a material of current interest, has a recommended safety factor of 3, something which can lead to that the plug does not crush in unfortunate situations at the low pressures one operates at after an opening of the plug.
The term “safety factor 3” means that a glass plug constructed for a differential pressure of 345 bar will need to withstand a pressure of up to three times said differential pressure, i.e. 345×3=1035 bar to maintain recommended safety factor for glass.
Another disadvantage is that the fluid pressure must be increased in the well after the opening system of the plug is activated. This can lead to a risk of damage of the reservoir when the plug collapses under higher pressure than the hydrostatic pressure in the well.
The invention shall now be explained in more detail with reference to the enclosed figures, in which:
Initially, reference is made to
The plug 20, hereafter only termed a glass plug, is inserted in the well 30 to carry out pressure testing of the well to control that all parts are sufficiently leak proof and can hold a given pressure of fluid.
When these tests have been carried out, the plug 20 is removed in that it is exploded with the two explosive charges 13,14. The explosion can take place in many ways. A normal way is that well fluid, with a given pressure, is let into the inner parts of the explosive charge housing 15,16 so that an ignition pin 19 is pushed down and hits an ignitor 123,17,18 which initiates the ignition of the underlying explosive charge 13,14. The glass is thus burst into a fine dust that does not cause any damage in the well. The elements 15,16 themselves are also exploded into small fragments. Explosion elements of the type shown in
The plug is inserted in the well to temporarily close the fluid flow through the well, such as during pressure testing of the well, to ensure that all parts thereof are sufficiently leak proof and can retain a given pressure.
The above considerations are not required to be made in the solution (not shown) when the explosives are placed in the centre of the plug element, but this also has all the disadvantages with possibilities for residues after explosives and also transportation problems and otherwise the risks of handling that are associated with the use of explosives.
It is an aim of the invention to provide a solution where the plug is crushed without the need for explosives and also to avoid the limitations which today's solutions without explosives place on such things as thickness of the plug element and danger of damage to the well formation at the opening under higher pressure than the hydrostatic pressure in the well.
The present invention is characterised in that a plug body has an internal hollow space 1 which can be pressurised to an internal pressure, which internal pressure one or more plug bodies 2 that the main plug body, can not withstand, so that a crushing/pulverisation of the plug occurs.
The hollow space 1 communicates with the pipe fluid passage 201 via a system of channels 203,20,21,4 designed in the wall of the pipe section 22. The entrance to the channel system is shown at 203, and passes further downward as a boring 4 which is in connection with the hollow space 1. A hydraulic operated elongated piston 5 is arranged in the channel downstream of a valve 7, and is held in place by shear pin 31. Thus the glass plug body 2a,2b is protected against unintentional rupturing due to normal pressure fluctuations in the channel system.
The valve 7 is arranged to open for fluid pressure into a hollow space 20 in such a way that the piston area in the annular space 20 which is pressurised via a valve 7, is larger than the area of the boring/annular space 4. The valve is arranged to open for fluid flow by a signal. Then the shear pin 31 breaks and the piston 5 is forced downwardly thus increasing the fluid pressure through the fluid channel 4 and further increasing pressure into the hollow space 1 of the glass plug body 2a,2b and starting the crushing process removing the glass plug body 2. The upper portion 5a of the piston 5 (
The present invention is characterised in that the fluid pressure in the hollow space 1 and the boring 4 which is in connection with the hollow space 1 is provided by means of a hydraulic piston which is arranged in a horizontally set up casing in the plug body (or housing) 9 in such a way that the piston area in the annular space 20 which is pressurised via a valve 7, is larger than the area of the boring/annular space 4. Thus, one obtains that when the annular space 20 is pressurised, a difference arises between the pressure in the chamber/annular space 4 and 12. As a consequence of the area difference of piston 5, the fluid pressure in the boring/annular space 4 will be higher than the supplied fluid pressure in the annular space 20.
A premise is that the annular space 21 has either atmospheric pressure or is drained out into an accumulator (accumulator chamber not shown).
According to the invention, it is preferred that the piston 5 is powered by the hydraulic pressure of the well. Alternatively, this can, for example, be replaced by compressed gas. According to the invention, it is also preferred that the piston 5 is set up horizontally in the casing 5. In an alternative embodiment, several borings are provided to a number of pistons which influence several gates in towards the hollow space 1. These pistons can be moved inwards or outwards from the centre line of the plug 4 according to need.
In the
The length or extent of the plug section of the invention is indicated (see also
When the valve 7 opens for fluid pressure into the hollow space 20, the piston 5 moves axially downwards and creates a higher pressure in the hollow space 4 which is transferred to the hollow space 1. The axial movement of the piston 5 which travels downwards occurs because the annular space 21 is pressurised atmospherically. This extra pressure in the hollow space 1 leads to the plug bodies being blown apart hydraulically. If required, a calibrated pressure can be pressurised in advance in the hollow space 1 through a plugged gate 33 in the plug body 9 by installing special tools for this in the gate 33 (tool not shown).This pressure which is installed in advance must lie below the rupturing pressure of the plug body 2. The higher pressure which is created when piston 5 moves downwards can only be released by crushing the plug body 2, as the plug body 2 has a high-pressure seal 3,13 and 11 which can withstand the pressure and will not yield to the pressure before the plug body 2 ruptures.
In
In
In
Alternatively, there can be other embodiment forms of controlled rupturing, for example, by varying the thickness of the plug bodies 2a and 2b.
A hydrocarbon formation 100 is penetrated by a well 102 to bring the hydrocarbons to the surface 140 for further utilization. An installation to handle the hydrocarbons at the surface is shown at 130. A hydrocarbon production pipe 13 is arranged through the well 102. The end section of the production pipe 13 may optionally be closed by a blind plug 25. After the pressure testing has ceased the pipe may be perforated adjacent to the hydrocarbon containing formation or formations, in order to allow for in-flow of hydrocarbons into the production pipe.
The plug 25 is fitted at the end of the pipe 27 where a gasket is shown between pipe 27 and pipe 28 to seal the space between the production pipe and the external well wall. Thereby, pipe 27 can be pressure tested against the test plug 25. After the pressure testing of pipe 25 and its upper components has been conducted, plug 25 can be opened by sending in, for example, signals to an opening system fitted into the plug 25. The signal can, for example, be hydraulic pressure pulses, an electric signal, an acoustic signal or ultrasound.
With the present invention, a considerable technical step forward has been made in this area which relates to test plugs in a disintegrate able/crushable material.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2008 1735 | Apr 2008 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2009/000138 | 4/8/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/25/2010 |