Plug counter, fracing system and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9188235
  • Patent Number
    9,188,235
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 5, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 17, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
A valve includes a tubular having at least one port, and a sleeve in operable communication with the tubular configured to uncover the at least one port in response to moving from a first position to a second position. The valve also has a seat that is configured to be passed a selected number of times without shifting the sleeve from the first position to the second position and is further configured to be passed one additional time after the selected number of times after shifting the sleeve from the first position to the second position.
Description
BACKGROUND

In the Drilling and completion industries it is often desirable to affect tools or formations at a great distance from a surface located facility such as a rig. One example of an operation intended to affect a formation is a fracturing operation often referred to as fracing. In order to perform such an operation, hydraulic pressure is built within a tubing string until the pressure exceeds formation capability for holding that pressure and fractures the formation. This type of operation is most effective if done in small incremental sections of a borehole for reasons related to control and distribution of fractures to serve the ultimate purpose of the borehole. Such purposes include hydrocarbon production and Carbon Dioxide sequestration, for example.


In the art, fracturing discrete locations of the borehole tends to require a number of tools related to the pressuring of discrete locations. Where multiple fracturing locations are contemplated, generally a staged system must be built and administered correctly for it to work. One such system uses progressively larger seat diameters from the toe back to surface and then corresponding progressively increasing diameter plugs or balls. While the system works well, it is limited by the number of different size balls that can be used. Tolerance is also required in any system (due to such things as irregular shape of tubing secondary to borehole irregularity), which therefore further limits the number of diameters usable in a particular system.


Since fracturing and other operations where it is desirable to isolate discrete locations continue to become more prevalent and ubiquitous, alternate systems for accessing and manipulating the downhole environment are always well received.


SUMMARY

Disclosed herein is a plug counter. The plug counter includes a seat receptive of a plug in a first position and capable of passing the plug in a second position. A first sleeve is in operable communication with the seat and is longitudinally movable in response to movement of the seat between the first position and the second position. A second sleeve is in operable communication with at least one of the first sleeve and the seat and is configured to index upon passage of the plug. A key is in operable communication with the seat and is configured to prevent movement of the seat to the second position after a selected number of plugs have passed the seat. A third sleeve is in operable communication with the first sleeve, and a release member is in operable communication with the third sleeve and is configured to move the third sleeve with the first sleeve after it is released.


Further disclosed is a method of fracing multiple zones. The method includes, running a plurality of plugs having substantially the same dimensions, indexing a plurality of plug counters with each of the plurality of plugs run, opening a fracing valve with one of the plurality of plug counters with the running of a first one of the plurality of plugs, and plugging one of the plurality of plug counters with the running of the first one of the plurality of plugs. Also included is pressuring up and fracing a formation through the opened fracing valve, running more of the plurality of plugs, further indexing some of the plurality of plug counters with each of the plurality of plugs run, opening another fracing valve with the running of a second one of the plurality of plugs, plugging one of the plurality of plug counters with the running of the second one of the plurality of plugs, and pressuring up and fracing a formation through the opened fracing valve.


Further disclosed is a fracing system which includes a plurality of same sized plugs and a plurality of clusters of fracing valves, wherein each of the plurality of clusters is controllable by the plurality of same sized plugs to open at least one of the plurality of the fracing valves within each cluster and plugging an outlet of each cluster to allow fracing thereof separately from each of the other clusters of the plurality of clusters.


Further disclosed is a valve including a tubular having at least one port, and a sleeve in operable communication with the tubular configured to open the at least one port in response to moving from a first position to a second position. Also included is a defeatable seat in operable communication with the sleeve, wherein the valve is configured to pass a selected number of same sized plugs without shifting the sleeve from the first position to the second position and to pass a next one of the same sized plugs after the selected number of same sized plugs only after shifting the sleeve from the first position to the second position.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:



FIGS. 1-4 illustrate a cross sectional view of one embodiment of a portion of the tool disclosed herein in four different positions;



FIGS. 5-8 illustrate in partial transparent view a counter portion of the tool disclosed herein in four different positions corresponding to the positions shown in FIGS. 1-4;



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of an alternate moveable seat substitutable in the tool;



FIG. 10 is a schematic view of a portion of an alternate housing of the tool 10 shown in FIG. 1;



FIGS. 11A-11C depict a cross sectional view of an embodiment of a plug counter disclosed herein; and



FIG. 12 depicts a magnified cross sectional view of a telescoping port disclosed herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIGS. 1-4, a portion of plug counter tool 10 is illustrated in longitudinal cross section in four different positions to make apparent not only its structural constituents but its operation as well. It is initially noted that the term “plug” as used herein is intended to encompass tripping balls, darts, and similar structures that can be propagated through a borehole and/or tubing string to reach remote locations therewithin. The plug counter tool embodiments disclosed herein facilitate the use of a single size plug for multiple actuation sequences. For example, where multiple fracture points are desired in a borehole, traditional fracturing would require a number of different diameter plugs used sequentially from smaller to larger as operations progress up the hole. With the tool embodiments described herein only one size plug is needed.


Referring directly to FIG. 1, an outer housing 12 includes a support 14 to support a moveable plug seat 16, which in the case of FIG. 1 is presented by a set of collet fingers 18. The support 14 and movable seat 16 operate together to catch a plug 20 after which the plug is passed or denied passage as discussed hereunder. The fingers 18 are supported by support 14 while the collet fingers are in a first position shown in FIG. 1. Support for the fingers 18 is dependent upon the position of collet 22, which is dependent upon the ability of a spring 24 to hold the collet 22 in the first position shown in FIG. 1. More specifically, when a plug is seated in the seat 16 pressure can and will in operation be built uphole of the plug. The spring rate of the spring 24 selected dictates the amount of fluid pressure that can be resisted before the collet 22 moves in a downhole direction and the fingers 18 become unsupported. The spring 24 is a compression spring and as illustrated is a coil spring. It will hold the collet 22 in the illustrated first position until a plug 20 engages the seat 16 and sufficient fluid pressure uphole of the plug overcomes the spring force of spring 24 and compresses the same. As the spring 24 is overcome by fluid pressure, the collet 22 moves in a downhole direction (to the right in the Figure) and moves the fingers 18 off of the support 14 to a second position. Just downhole of the support 14 is a plug passage recess 28 that will allow radial expansion of the fingers 18 (see FIG. 2) by an amount sufficient to allow passage of the plug 20 through the seat 16. After passage of the plug 20, fluid pressure equalizes across the seat 16 and the collet 22 returns to the first position of FIG. 1 under the bias of the spring 24.


Connected to the collet 22 is j-slot sleeve 30. Sleeve 30 moves axially of the tool 10 along with the collet 22. At a downhole end of the housing 12, an anti-rotation sleeve 32 is attached to the housing 12. Sleeve 32 does not move relative to housing 12 in any way once the tool is assembled. Anti-rotation sleeve 32 includes one or more pin openings 34 into which one or more pins 36 will be individually inserted. Each pin 36 will thus be fixed to the anti-rotation sleeve 32 and extend into an alignment groove 38 of which there will be one or more in the j-slot sleeve 30. The one or more pins 36 and respective alignment grooves 38 ensure that the j-slot sleeve 30 is not rotatable but is permitted to move only axially during operation of the tool 10. Upon movement of the collet 22 induced by fluid pressure uphole of plug 20 as described above, the j-slot sleeve 30 will cycle back and forth axially of the tool 10.


Radially inwardly of the anti-rotation sleeve 32 and rotatable relative thereto is a helix sleeve 40 exhibiting a helical track 42 at an outside surface thereof. The helix sleeve 40 includes one or more j-slot followers 44 (one shown), which may be a part of the helix sleeve 40 or may be a separate component that is engaged with the helix sleeve 40. In either event, the j-slot follower(s) 44 are configured to contact angled surfaces 46 and 48 of a j-slot 50 (see FIG. 5) disposed at the j-slot sleeve 30 upon axial movement of the j-slot sleeve 30. Because followers 44 are fixed to the helix sleeve 40, the helix sleeve 40 will move rotationally about the j-slot sleeve 30 as the followers 44 move along each angled surface 46 or 48. The impetus for this movement is the axial cycling of the j-slot sleeve 30 as described above. Each time a plug 20 lands at the seat 16, thereby allowing pressure to build from uphole against the plug 20, and hence urging the collet 22 to a position aligning the fingers 18 with recess 28, the followers 44 will contact and slide along one of the angled surfaces 46. This will cause a measured or indexed rotation of the helix sleeve 40. Because the spring 24 is compressed during this pressure induced axial movement, energy is stored that will be used to urge the followers 44 along the next adjacent angled surface 48 pursuant to the j-slot sleeve 30 moving uphole under spring bias, causing another measured or indexed rotation of the helix sleeve 40. The spring 24 induces such movement only after the plug 20, against which fluid pressure had been applied, is released.


As the helix sleeve 40 rotates, a key 52 that is engaged with the helical track 42 moves leftward in the drawing closer to an end 54 of a keyway 56. It is to be appreciated that although the illustrated embodiment moves in an uphole direction, the tool 10 can easily be configured to allow movement of the key 52 in a downhole direction by reversing the helix angle of the helical track 42 and reversing the surface angles of surfaces 46 and 48. As illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 5, the key 52 is in a position that will allow the greatest number of plugs to pass before preventing passage of the next plug to be seated. FIGS. 4 and 8 show the key in the position where the next plug to seat will not pass.


As configured the tool 10 will pass a number of plugs and then prevent further passage of plugs because the helix sleeve 40 is prevented from rotating by the contact between key 52 and an end 54 of keyway 56. The prevention of rotation of the helix sleeve 40 correspondingly prevents the j-slot sleeve 30 from cycling downhole sufficiently to allow the fingers 18 to reach the recess 28. Consequently the plug 20 cannot pass. This position is illustrated best in FIG. 8 where key 52 is at end 54 and follower 44 is at surface 46 but it cannot slide on surface 46 because the key will no longer allow rotation of the helix sleeve 40 due to having run out of helical track 42. It is to be understood, then, that the maximum number of plugs that are passable through tool 10 are fixed by design during manufacture by the length of the helical track 42 and the keyway 56. This is not to say however that this maximum number of plugs is the only number of plugs that will be passable before a plug is denied passage. Rather, because the key is placable in the keyway 56 as the tool is being run into the hole, at any point on the helical track 42 that is exposed to the keyway 56, any number from the maximum number down to a single plug may be selected.


More specifically, the key 52 is a component of the tool 10 that is removable and replaceable at any point along the keyway 56 where the helical track 42 crosses the keyway 56. The helix sleeve 40 itself may be marked to show how many plugs will pass before denying passage to make it a simple operation in the field for a rig worker to place the key in the keyway 56 to select a number of plug passages to facilitate a particular operation. It should be noted that because of the high pressures generally encountered in the wellbore for operations related to seating plugs and the potential operations that might be effected by pressuring up on such a plug, for example fracturing at about 10,000 psi, the key 52 should be robust in size and construction as it is, in the end, the key that stops movement of the balance of the components.


Referring to FIGS. 9 and 10, an alternate embodiment of a portion of plug counter tool 110 is illustrated. The embodiment operates similarly to the tool 10 and identically operating components are not discussed again. The tool is distinct in that a dog-based seat structure 122, having a plug seat 116, is substituted for the collet 22 in the FIG. 1 embodiment. For clarity, numerals are mimicked in the 100 series. In normal operation, dogs 118 function as do the fingers 18 from the previous embodiment. The housing 112 is also distinct in that an additional plug passage recess 150 is provided uphole of the support 114 so that in reverse flow, the one or more dogs 118 can be moved into alignment with the recess 150 to allow passage of one or more plugs 20 in the uphole direction as part of a reverse circulation operation to remove the plugs 20 from the borehole. In order for the structure 122 to move uphole, a plug that had been passed in normal operation of the tool 110 is moved in reverse circulation into a seat 117 on the backside of seat 116. The pressure of reverse circulation acts on the plug in the same manner as in the original operation but in the opposite direction. A spring 152 is disposed uphole of the structure 122 and will be compressed against a top sub 154 at a selected force from fluid pressure on the plug. Movement of the structure 122 in the uphole direction mirrors that of movement in the downhole direction and aligns the dogs 118 with the recess 128, which allows the plug to pass. While an embodiment could eliminate spring 152 and simply allow the structure 122 to stay in the uphole position, including the spring 152 provides the added benefit that the device will automatically revert to a functional state after passage of the plug in the uphole direction so that normal operation of the tool 110 could be resumed if desired. Since reverse circulating has specifically been addressed with respect to this embodiment, it is further noted that a dissolvable or disintegratable plug can be used thereby obviating the need for reverse circulation to remove the plug. Such dissolvable or disintegratable plugs can be used in each embodiment of the invention, if desired.


Referring to FIGS. 11A-11C, an embodiment of a plug counter 210, disclosed herein, is illustrated that incorporates features of the tools 10 and 110 therein. The tool 210 includes a helical counter arrangement 214, similar to that disclosed in FIGS. 1-8 therefore the same reference characters are employed here. A plug seat 216 that is passable is also included. The plug seat 216 has one or more dogs 218 that are radially expandable into a recess 226 in a tubular 230 upon longitudinal movement that causes the dogs 218 to align with the recess 226. Although this embodiment employs a single passable seat arrangement it should be understood that any passable seat arrangement could be employed including the plugs seat 16 described in FIGS. 1-4.


A primary difference in the plug counter 210 from that of tools 10 or 110 is what occurs after the selected plug has caused the key 52 to prevent further longitudinal movements of the plug seat 226. Unlike the above embodiments, in the embodiment of counter 210 the plug 20 is still allowed to pass but only after failure of a release member 264 also disclosed herein as a force failing member (shown in FIG. 11C only) illustrated herein as shear pins.


To achieve this the plug counter 210 is configured to index the helical counter 214 each time one of the plugs 20 passes. Doing so entails building pressure against the plug 20, seated against the seat 216, until sufficient pressure is achieved to compress biasing member 24 thereby allowing j-slot sleeve 30 to move relative to housing 12 (in a rightward direction in the Figures). Since the recesses 226 are on the housing 12, the plug 20 is allowed to pass the seat 216 when the j-slot sleeve 30 has moved to the point where the dogs 218 reach the recess 226. As mentioned, each time one of the plugs 20 passes in this manner the helical counter 214 indexes.


After passing the selected number of plugs 20 to cause the helical counter to max out the key 52 prevents the J-slot sleeve 30 from moving at the same force that previously caused it to move. The force increases, in response to pressure increasing uphole of the seated plug 20, until sufficient force is generated to fail a force failing member 232 that holds the housing 12 in position relative to a tubular 236 within which the housing 12 and all the other components discussed previously are positioned. The force failing member 232, shown herein as a shear pin, is shown in an already sheared condition and thus is in two separate pieces.


Longitudinal movement of the housing 12, made possible by failure of the force failing member 232, allows the uncovering of one or more ports 240 formed in a wall 244 of the tubular 236. These ports 240 when uncovered are configured to provide fluidic communication between an inside 248 and an outside 252 of the tubular 236. The ports 240 may, however, be plugged at least for a time as will be discussed further below. The ports 240 disclosed herein are fracing ports that allow fluid pumped therethrough to fracture a formation on the outside 252 of the tubular 236.


Longitudinal movement of the housing 12 relative to the tubular 236 is limited by contact between an end 256 of the housing 12 and a shoulder 260 of the tubular 236. Pressure is again allowed to increase resulting in increased forces in response to the housing 12 not moving. Another force failing member 264 preventing additional travel between the J-slot sleeve 30 and the housing 12 fractures when sufficient force is applied. In this embodiment, this second force failing member 264 is the key 52 itself. Once the key 52 is fractured the J-slot sleeve 30 is again allowed to move relative to the housing 12 until the plug seat 216 aligns with the recess 226, thereby allowing the plug 20 to pass. In order to assure that the ports 240 are uncovered before the plug 20 passes, the first force failing member 232 needs to be set to fail at a lower force than the second force failing members 264.


The foregoing construction allows for any number of the plug counters 210 to be employed for opening fracing ports 240 upon the running of a selected number of plugs 20. A fracing operation can also be carried out just by altering the force need to fail one of the force failing member 232 or 264 at one of the plug counters 210 downhole of the other plug counters 210. The higher threshold need only be set to a pressure higher than is needed to perform a fracing operation to assure that the fracing can take place.


Having a plurality of the ports 240 above a plug counter 210 open can make generating pressure sufficient to fail either force failing member 232, 264 of the downstream plug counter 210 difficult. One way to address this concern is to plug the ports 240 with material that can be removed at a desired later time. For example, a disintegratable material 268 can be used to plug the ports 240 until the ports are exposed to fluid from the inside 248, for example. By fluidically sealing the disintegratable material 268 with a rupturable material 272 on an outer surface thereof, the onset of disintegration can be delayed until the housing 12 has been moved to thereby expose the disintegrable material 268 to the reactive fluids on the inside 248. Alternately, the disintegrable material 268 can be set to disintegrate in response to other stimulus such as changes in temperature and pressure for example.


Yet another method of removing a blockage from the ports 240 at a desired time is by using just the rupturable material 272 without the disintegratable material 268. To do so one need set a pressure at which the rupturable material 272 ruptures at pressures greater than is required to fail the force failing members 232, 264 of all the plug counters 210 that are to be opened for fracing and less than a pressure to fail a force failing member 232, 264 of the plug counter 210 being used to plug the downstream end of the tubular 236.


Referring to FIG. 12, another embodiment of a port disclosed herein that could allow sufficient pressure to build to fail either force failing member 232, 264 is illustrated at 280. The port 280 includes a nozzle 284 with an opening 288 sized to generate backpressure in response to flow therethrough. A dimension of the opening 288 can be selected based upon the number of the ports 284 that will be open at a given time and flow rates available to generate a backpressure sufficient to fail the applicable force failing member 232, 264. The ports 284 in this embodiment have three optional telescoping sleeves 292A, 292B and 292C, although any number of the sleeves 292 could be employed. The telescoping sleeves 292A, 292B and 292C are configured to extend relative to one another such that a radially outer surface 296 is radially extendable in response to the sleeve 292A moving relative to the sleeve 292B, and the sleeve 292B moving relative to the sleeve 292C. This configuration allows the sleeve 292A to move into sealing contact with a wall (not shown) of a formation, for example, to facilitate inject of fluid pumped through the port 280, under pressure, directly into the formation. The telescoping sleeves 292A, 292B and 292C can be set to telescope at pressures less than what is required to fail either of the force failing members 232 or 264.


With such a set up a plurality of clusters of plug counters 210 could be positioned along a single tubular 236. Working from the cluster furthest from surface first, each cluster could in sequence be opened and fraced through, all with the same sized plug 20.


While one or more embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A valve, comprising; a tubular usable downhole having at least one port;a sleeve in operable communication with the tubular configured to uncover the at least one port in response to moving from a first position to a second position; anda seat being configured to be passed by plugs a selected number of times without shifting the sleeve from the first position to the second position and being further configured to be passed one additional time by an additional plug after the selected number of times after shifting the sleeve from the first position to the second position.
  • 2. The valve of claim 1, wherein the valve is a treating valve.
  • 3. The valve of claim 1, wherein the valve is a fracturing valve.
  • 4. The valve of claim 1, wherein the plugs and the additional plug seatingly engagable with the seat have at least one dimension that is substantially the same.
  • 5. The valve of claim 1, wherein the plugs and the additional plug seatingly engagable with the seat are substantially the same size in all dimensions.
  • 6. The valve of claim 1, wherein the plugs and the additional plug seatingly engagable with the seat are balls.
  • 7. The valve of claim 1, wherein the at least one port is plugged for at least a period of time after being uncovered by the sleeve.
  • 8. The valve of claim 7, wherein the at least one port is plugged with a disintegratable material.
  • 9. The valve of claim 7, wherein the at least one port is plugged with a rupturable material.
  • 10. The valve of claim 7, wherein the at least one port includes a nozzle with an opening sized to generate backpressure in response to flow therethrough.
  • 11. The valve of claim 7, wherein the at least one port includes at least one telescoping sleeve.
  • 12. The valve of claim 1, further comprising: a first force failing member, the valve being configured to allow the sleeve to move from the first position to the second position after failure of the first force failing member; anda second force failing member in operable communication with the seat, the valve being configured such that the seat is passable after the sleeve has moved to the second position after the second force failing member has failed.
  • 13. The valve of claim 12, wherein the first force failing member fails at loads less than loads required to fail the second force failing member.
  • 14. The valve of claim 12, wherein the second force failing member is configured to fail at loads above pressures needed to allow fracturing to take place.
US Referenced Citations (201)
Number Name Date Kind
2277816 Brown Mar 1942 A
2376594 Hite May 1945 A
2448423 Dodge Aug 1948 A
2562455 Gridley Jul 1951 A
2769454 Bletcher et al. Nov 1956 A
2812717 Brown Nov 1957 A
2822757 Colberly Feb 1958 A
2973006 Nelson Feb 1961 A
3007527 Nelson Nov 1961 A
3013612 Angel Dec 1961 A
3117797 Buck Jan 1964 A
3148731 Holden Sep 1964 A
3211232 Grimmer Oct 1965 A
3263752 Conrad Aug 1966 A
3358771 Berryman Dec 1967 A
3510103 Carsello May 1970 A
3517939 Jaehn Jun 1970 A
3566964 Livingston Mar 1971 A
3583714 Weltzer et al. Jun 1971 A
3599998 Kiwalle et al. Aug 1971 A
3667505 Radig Jun 1972 A
3669462 Parsons Jun 1972 A
3703104 Tamplen Nov 1972 A
3727635 Todd Apr 1973 A
3761008 Goulder Sep 1973 A
3797255 Kammerer, Jr. et al. Mar 1974 A
3901315 Parker et al. Aug 1975 A
3954138 Miffre May 1976 A
3997003 Adkins Dec 1976 A
4067358 Streich Jan 1978 A
4160478 Calhoun et al. Jul 1979 A
4176717 Hix Dec 1979 A
4190239 Schwankhart Feb 1980 A
4246968 Jessup et al. Jan 1981 A
4260017 Nelson et al. Apr 1981 A
4291722 Churchman Sep 1981 A
4292988 Montgomery Oct 1981 A
4355685 Beck Oct 1982 A
4390065 Richardson Jun 1983 A
4423777 Mullins et al. Jan 1984 A
4433726 Preston, Jr. et al. Feb 1984 A
4438811 Patel Mar 1984 A
4448216 Speegle et al. May 1984 A
4474241 Freeman Oct 1984 A
4478279 Puntar et al. Oct 1984 A
4513822 Gilbert Apr 1985 A
4537383 Fredd Aug 1985 A
4554981 Davies Nov 1985 A
4566541 Moussy et al. Jan 1986 A
4576234 Upchurch Mar 1986 A
4583593 Zunkel et al. Apr 1986 A
4655290 Smith, Jr. Apr 1987 A
4657078 Fraser, III et al. Apr 1987 A
4662785 Gibb et al. May 1987 A
4669538 Szarka Jun 1987 A
4711326 Baugh et al. Dec 1987 A
4714116 Brunner Dec 1987 A
4715445 Smith, Jr. Dec 1987 A
4726425 Smith, Jr. Feb 1988 A
4729432 Helms Mar 1988 A
4762447 Marantette Aug 1988 A
4823882 Stokley et al. Apr 1989 A
4826135 Mielke May 1989 A
4856591 Donovan et al. Aug 1989 A
4893678 Stokley et al. Jan 1990 A
4944379 Haaser Jul 1990 A
4949788 Szarka et al. Aug 1990 A
4979561 Szarka Dec 1990 A
4991653 Schwegman Feb 1991 A
4991654 Brandell et al. Feb 1991 A
5020946 Nann Jun 1991 A
5029643 Winslow et al. Jul 1991 A
5029644 Szarka et al. Jul 1991 A
5056599 Comeaux et al. Oct 1991 A
5117913 Themig Jun 1992 A
5207274 Streich et al. May 1993 A
5230390 Zastresek et al. Jul 1993 A
5244044 Henderson Sep 1993 A
5297580 Thurman Mar 1994 A
5305837 Johns et al. Apr 1994 A
5325917 Szarka Jul 1994 A
5335727 Cornette et al. Aug 1994 A
5343946 Morrill Sep 1994 A
5343954 Bohlen et al. Sep 1994 A
5381862 Szarka et al. Jan 1995 A
5394941 Venditto et al. Mar 1995 A
5398947 Cook Mar 1995 A
5425424 Reinhardt et al. Jun 1995 A
5529126 Edwards Jun 1996 A
5551512 Smith Sep 1996 A
5567093 Richmond Oct 1996 A
5609178 Hennig et al. Mar 1997 A
5620050 Barbee Apr 1997 A
5695009 Hipp Dec 1997 A
5704393 Connell et al. Jan 1998 A
5762142 Connell et al. Jun 1998 A
5775421 Duhon et al. Jul 1998 A
5775428 Davis et al. Jul 1998 A
5813483 Latham et al. Sep 1998 A
5890540 Pia et al. Apr 1999 A
5960881 Allamon et al. Oct 1999 A
6050340 Scott Apr 2000 A
6053250 Echols Apr 2000 A
6056053 Giroux et al. May 2000 A
6079496 Hirth Jun 2000 A
6102060 Howlett et al. Aug 2000 A
6155350 Melenyzer Dec 2000 A
6173795 McGarian et al. Jan 2001 B1
6220350 Brothers et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227298 Patel May 2001 B1
6253861 Carmichael et al. Jul 2001 B1
6293517 Cunningham Sep 2001 B1
6378609 Oneal et al. Apr 2002 B1
6474412 Hamilton et al. Nov 2002 B2
6530574 Bailey et al. Mar 2003 B1
6547007 Szarka et al. Apr 2003 B2
6571880 Butterfield, Jr. et al. Jun 2003 B1
6626244 Powers Sep 2003 B2
6634428 Krauss et al. Oct 2003 B2
6644412 Bode et al. Nov 2003 B2
6666273 Laurel Dec 2003 B2
6668933 Kent Dec 2003 B2
6681860 Yokley et al. Jan 2004 B1
6712145 Allamon Mar 2004 B2
6712415 Darbishire et al. Mar 2004 B1
6763891 Humphrey et al. Jul 2004 B2
6834726 Giroux et al. Dec 2004 B2
6866100 Gudmestad et al. Mar 2005 B2
6896049 Moyes May 2005 B2
6907936 Fehr et al. Jun 2005 B2
6948561 Myron et al. Sep 2005 B2
6983795 Zuklic et al. Jan 2006 B2
7150326 Bishop et al. Dec 2006 B2
7210534 Hayter et May 2007 B2
7322408 Howlett Jan 2008 B2
7322417 Rytlewski et al. Jan 2008 B2
7325617 Murray Feb 2008 B2
7337847 McGarian et al. Mar 2008 B2
7350578 Szarka et al. Apr 2008 B2
7367399 Steele et al. May 2008 B2
7377321 Rytlewski May 2008 B2
7387165 Lopez de Cardenas et al. Jun 2008 B2
7416029 Telfer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7467664 Cochran et al. Dec 2008 B2
7503390 Gomez Mar 2009 B2
7503392 King et al. Mar 2009 B2
7520336 Mondelli et al. Apr 2009 B2
7703510 Xu Apr 2010 B2
7730953 Casciaro Jun 2010 B2
7798212 Bolze et al. Sep 2010 B2
7832472 Themig Nov 2010 B2
7909120 Slack Mar 2011 B2
7971883 Soroka et al. Jul 2011 B2
8061429 Du et al. Nov 2011 B2
8291988 King Oct 2012 B2
8393389 Brisco et al. Mar 2013 B2
8443894 Coghill et al. May 2013 B2
8684096 Harris et al. Apr 2014 B2
8727010 Turner et al. May 2014 B2
9074451 Themig et al. Jul 2015 B2
20010007284 French et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020170717 Venning et al. Nov 2002 A1
20040007365 Hill et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040221984 Cram Nov 2004 A1
20050061372 McGrath et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050072572 Churchill Apr 2005 A1
20050126638 Gilbert Jun 2005 A1
20050205264 Starr et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060124310 Lopez de Cardenas et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060169463 Howlett Aug 2006 A1
20060175092 Mashburn Aug 2006 A1
20060213670 Bishop et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060243455 Telfer et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070007007 Themig et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070012438 Hassel-Sorensen Jan 2007 A1
20070023087 Krebs et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070095538 Szarka et al. May 2007 A1
20070272413 Rytlewski et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070289749 Wood et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080066924 Xu Mar 2008 A1
20080093080 Palmer et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080190620 Posevina et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080217025 Ruddock et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080308282 Standridge et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090032255 Surjaatmadja et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044944 Murray et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044946 Schasteen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044948 Avant et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044955 King et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090056934 Xu Mar 2009 A1
20090056952 Churchill Mar 2009 A1
20090101330 Johnson Apr 2009 A1
20090107680 Surjaatmadja Apr 2009 A1
20090159289 Avant et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090308588 Howell et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100294514 Crow et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110048723 Edwards Mar 2011 A1
20110073330 Radford Mar 2011 A1
20110108284 Flores et al. May 2011 A1
20110174500 Davies et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180274 Wang et al. Jul 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2760107 Nov 2010 CA
2731161 Jun 2013 CA
0427422 May 1991 EP
2281924 Mar 1995 GB
63174808 Jul 1988 JP
0015943 Mar 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (28)
Entry
Baker Hughes, Baker Oil Tools, Conventional Fishing Technical Unit; Pump Out Sub Product Family No. H14061, Jun. 7, 2005, 1 page.
Boscan, J., et al., “Successful Well Testing Operations in High-Pressure/High-Temperature Encironment; Case Histories,” SPE 84096, Oct. 2003, pp. 1-15.
Brad Musgrove, Multi-Layer Fracturing Solution Treat and Produce Completions, Nov. 12, 2007, pp. 1-23, Schlumberger, U.S.A.
G.L. Rytlewski, A Study of Fracture Initiation Pressures in Cemented Cased-Hole Wells Without Perforations, May 15, 2006, pp. 1-10, SPE 100572, Society of Petroleum Engineers, U.S.A.
Hoch, Ottmar, Marty Stromquist et al., “Multiple Precision Hydraulic Fractures of Low Permeability Horizontal Openhole Sandstone Wells,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 5-8, 2003, Denver Colorado.
Hoffman, C.R., “One-Trip Sand-Control/Liner Hangar/ Big-Bore Completion System,” SPE 101086, Sep. 2006, pp. 1-10.
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/034752, dated Jan. 27, 2011, pp. 1-3.
International Search Report with Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2011/029622; International Filing Date: Nov. 8, 2010; 9 pages.
International Search Report, Feb. 11, 2009 pp. 1-3, PCT/US2008/072732, Korean Intellectual Property Office.
International Search Report, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-3, PCT/US2008/072734, Korean Intellectual Property Office.
International Search Report, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-3, PCT/US2008/072735, Korean Intellectual Property Office.
International Search Report, Jan. 19, 2009, pp. 1-3, PCT/US2008/072470, Korean Intellectual Property Office.
RFID Keystone Module, RFID & Intelligent Products, Petrowell retrieved online on May 27, 2009 from: http://www.petrowell.co.uk/index2.php?option=com—docman&task=doc—view&gid=15&Itemid=26.
Ross, C. M., et al., “Current Materials and Devices for Control of Fluid Loss,” SPE 54323, Apr. 1999, pp. 1-16.
StageFRAC Maximize Reservoir Drainage, 2007, pp. 1-2, Schlumberger, U.S.A.
TAP Completion System, Schlumberger, 4 pages, Dec. 2007.
International Search Report; PCT/US2010/044399; International Searching Authority KIPO; Mailed Mar. 21, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2010/044378; Mailed Mar. 17, 2011.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2010/044856; Mailed Apr. 15, 2011.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2010/044383; Mailed Apr. 15, 2011.
International Search Report; PCT/US2010/033737; Korean Intellectual Property Office; Mailed Jan. 24, 2011.
International Search Report; Date of Mailing Jan. 24, 2011; International Appln No. PCT/US2010/034736; 3 pages.
International Search Report; Date of Mailing Jan. 24, 2011; Internatiaonal Appln. No. PCT/US2010/034735; 3 pages.
Nternational Search Report and Written Opinion; Date of Mailing Feb. 11, 2011; International Appln No. PCT/US2010/041049; International Search Report 5 pages and Written Opinion 3 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2010/054487; International Searching Authority; KIPO; Mailed Jun. 3, 2011.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2010/049810; International Searching Authority KIPO; Mailed Apr. 25, 2011.
International Search Report and Written Opinion; Date of Mailing Aug. 29, 2011; International Application No. PCT/US2011/022523; International Filing Date Jan. 26, 2011; Korean Intellectual Property Office; International Search Report 5 pages; Written Opinion 3 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2011/041663; Korean Intellectual Property Office; Mailed Dec. 14, 2011; 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150075639 A1 Mar 2015 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12862128 Aug 2010 US
Child 14296674 US