In processing metal coils, both ferrous and non-ferrous, slitting lines are used to reduce the width of an incoming coil by cutting it into a series of narrow coils. At the entry end of the line a coil is mounted on a mandrel and unwound. The unwound material is referred to as “strip”. The leading edge of the strip is passed through a slitting machine that slices the strip longitudinally into multiple widths (these portions are often referred to as “mults”) that are then rewound on a recoiling mandrel. The mults are then discharged and dealt with as individual narrow coils. The number of mults can vary from as little as two to as many as thirty or more.
Referring now to
The upper and lower arbors 10, 11 are tooled with the same spacing between adjacent knives but the arrangement is such that the upper knives versus the lower knives are offset to each other by essentially the width of a knife. As seen in
In a parallel fashion, one of the arbors 10, 11 is adjustable relative to the other arbor such that the vertical gap between the knives can be adjusted. Typically to make a cut, the vertical gap G between the upper and lower arbors has to be adjusted just right. If the gap is too wide, the strip S will not be cut. If the gap is too small, it may result in poor cut quality (i.e., bad edges). When the strip is “cut” the cut zone includes a zone of penetration and a zone of fracture through the thickness of the strip. The amount of penetration (i.e., knife gap) required to cause the fracture, depends on strip material properties.
When the strip is cut into mults, the leading edge of the strip can cause issues with threading the leading edge through the rest of the line downstream of the slitter.
For example, the individual mult leading edges want to curl up and down, each adjacent mult curls in the opposite direction of its neighbor, thus requiring special handling during the threading of the line.
To avoid this situation, it has become common practice for operators to vary the gap G between the slitting arbors. When the leading edge of the strip presents itself to the slitting machine, the gap between the upper and lower knives is adjusted too wide to effect the cut. After the leading edge is through the slitter, one of the slitter arbors is adjusted to close the gap between the upper and lower knives to a point where the material is “cut”. This technique leaves the leading edge of the strip with a length that is uncut and essentially one whole width of material thus making it much easier to thread the line. Once the line is threaded and the leading edge is close to the recoiler, the leading edge “uncut” zone is sheared off. This entire operator practice is often referred to as “plunge” slitting.
Plunge slitting is an improvement in threading the line, but it is an imperfect solution. The purpose of the present disclosure is to further improve the threading of slitting lines. In the process of slitting, in addition to the mults, the slitter also trims the outside edges (two edges) of the parent coil. This edge trimming accomplishes two things: 1) it establishes an exact width for the outermost two mults (one on each edge of the coil); and 2) it trims away bad edges from each edge of the parent coil (examples of bad edges or edges which could have cracks or could have material handling damage from prior handling of the parent coil).
Each edge trim includes a relatively narrow ribbon of scrap material. The scrap is removed from the line just downstream of the slitter. The two ribbons of scrap can be chopped into discrete scrap pieces (such was discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,901,271 related to scrap choppers which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) or the scrap could be wound onto scrap winders.
When operators use plunge slitting, the leading edge of the strip remains uncut and includes the “scrap” edges. This requires the operator to stop the line and enter the line to physically and manually cut the scrap away from the uncut zone thus allowing the scrap to be redirected to the scrap chopper chutes or to scrap winders. This practice reduces productivity and introduces an unsafe condition for the operator.
Another problem with existing slitters is that all of the knives are of a fixed size and same diameter. As a result, the edge trim and all of the mults are always cut. There is no existing way to only cut the edge trim without also cutting all of the mults.
Thus, there is a need for a method of improving the threading of slitting lines by incorporating knives of various diameters and sizes which overcomes the above mentioned deficiencies while providing better overall results.
The present disclosure relates to plunge slitting. More particularly, it relates to plunge slitting with improved scrap threading capability by using multiple size and multiple diameter knives. In accordance with one embodiment of the disclosure, a slitter and scrap chopper arrangement has knives of different sizes and diameters while stripper rubber sleeves are positioned on spacers between the knives.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the disclosure, a slitting machine for slitting metal strip has first and second arbors; a first set of rotary knives disposed on each of the first and second arbors having a first diameter; a second set of rotary knives disposed on each of the first and second arbors having a second diameter; where the second diameter is smaller than the first diameter.
In accordance with another embodiment of the disclosure, a method for threading metal strip through a slitting machine having provided first and second arbors including providing a first set of rotary knives having a first diameter disposed on each of the first and second arbors; providing a second set of rotary knives having a second diameter disposed on each of the first and second arbors; wherein said second diameter is smaller than the first diameter; and closing a gap between the first and second arbors to enable the first set of rotary knives to cut edge trim from the strip.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosure, the slitter arbors close while the strip is moving. This relates to the ratio of the rate of arbor closure vs strip travel and can be implemented as an automatic sequence controlled by the operator.
When the leading edge of the strip is at the nip of the slitter arbors, the arbor gap G is commanded to close at a predetermined rate while the strip advances (continues to feed past the slitter) at an appropriate line speed, such that by the time a couple of feet of strip has passed through the nip of the slitter arbors, the slitter arbor vertical gap G has closed to a point where the knife vertical gap is tight enough to cut through the strip. This can be a fully automated sequence or can be manual with the operator controlling the sequence. The key is the timing between the vertical closure of the arbors and the speed of advance of the strip.
As the arbor gap closes it is important for the strip to be advancing otherwise the separating force between the arbors would get quite large and possibly overload the slitter arbor bearings.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the disclosure, strip material is fed into the line and the slitter arbor gap G is preset too large to make the cut (i.e., during initial threading through the slitter). As the strip advances to the slitter, the slitter arbors are closed further at a closure speed that is appropriate to the strip advance speed.
If only an edge trim of the strip is desired, as the arbors are closed or “plunged”, the outer larger diameter knives cut or trim the outward edge of the strip, while the inner portion of the strip remains uncut due to the inner smaller diameter knives having a gap to large to cut the strip.
If the arbors are further closed or “plunged”, then the strip mults are cut by the inner knives, while the edge trim is cut by the outer knives. When strip has advanced far enough and slitter arbors are at their final cutting gap the strip will be cut all the way through including the mults and edge trim. Both outer edges of the strip have a trim width that will “automatically” thread itself into the scrap chutes and on into the scrap choppers or down to scrap winders.
In accordance with one embodiment of the disclosure, all the inwardly positioned knives on parallel slitter arbors, except the outer pairs, are of the same diameter.
In accordance with another embodiment of the disclosure, the outer pairs of knives; i.e., one pair at each of the two outside edges, are at a diameter which is larger than the diameter of the inner knives.
In accordance with another embodiment of the disclosure, there are preferably four knives of a larger diameter while there may be multiple pairs of knives of a smaller diameter dependent on the desired results.
In accordance with another embodiment of the disclosure, for a given gap between the upper and lower arbors, the gap between the larger diameter knives will be tighter than the gap between the smaller diameter knives.
In accordance with another embodiment of the disclosure, during plunge slitting, when the gap between the smaller diameter knives is too large to cut the strip, the gap at the larger diameter knives is small enough to cut through the strip.
Other aspects of the disclosure will become apparent upon a reading and understanding of the following detailed description.
The present disclosure relates to plunge slitting. More particularly, it relates to plunge slitting with improved scrap threading capability by using multiple size diameter knives.
The preferred embodiment of the disclosure in shown is
Stripper rubber sleeves 26 are positioned on spacers 28 between knives 30, 32. All the inwardly positioned knives 30 on the parallel slitter arbors 22, 24, except the outer pairs 32, are of the same diameter D1. The outer pairs of knives 32; i.e., one pair at each of the two outside edges, are at a diameter D2 which is larger diameter than D1. There are preferably four knives 32 of diameter D2 while there may be multiple pairs of knives 30 of diameter D1 dependent on the desired results. For a given gap between the upper and lower arbors 22, 24, the gap between the larger diameter knives 32 will be tighter than the gap between the smaller diameter knives 30.
In this manner, during plunge slitting, when the gap between the knives 30 is too large to cut strip 34, the gap at the knives 32 is small enough to cut through the strip. There can be multiple pairs of knives 30 dependent upon the number of mults formed on the strip. Thus the scrap (trim) is cut all the way through and threads itself into the scrap chutes. This overcomes the shortcomings of existing practice.
As the arbor gap G closes it is important for the strip 34 to be advancing otherwise the separating force between the arbors would get quite large and possibly overload the slitter arbor bearings.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the disclosure, strip material 34 is fed into the line and the slitter arbor gap G is preset too large to make the cut (i.e., during initial threading through the slitter). As the strip advances to the slitter, the slitter arbors are closed further at a closure speed that is appropriate to the strip advance speed.
If only an edge trim of the strip 34 is desired, as the arbors 22, 24 are closed or unplunged, the outer knives 32 cut or trim the outward edge of the strip, while the inner portions remains uncut due to the inner smaller diameter knives 30 not contacting the strip 24.
If the arbors are further closed or “plunged”, then the mults are cut by the inner knives 30, while the edge trim is cut the outer knives 32. When strip 34 has advanced far enough and slitter arbors are at their final cutting gap the strip will be cut all the way through including the mults and edge trim. Each edge has a trim width that will “automatically” thread itself into the scrap chutes and on into the scrap choppers or down to scrap winders.
Referring now to
Outer knives 32 are shown to be of diameter D1 which is larger than the diameter D2 of the inner knives 30. Spacers 28 with sleeves 26 are positioned between the knives on arbors 22, 24 (
Referring to
Referring to
The disclosure has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment. Obviously, modifications and alterations may occur to others while reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the disclosure includes all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the preceding description and appended claims.
This application claims priority from Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/447,613 filed on Jan. 18, 2017, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62447613 | Jan 2017 | US |