1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to oil and gas production operations, and more particularly to gas-lift plunger devices for lifting production fluids to the surface to restore production to shut in wells.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Gas lift plunger apparatus has been in use for many decades and has a long history of development. In one recent example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,438,125, Victor, a bypass assembly of a plunger lift device employs a bypass valve assembly having both an internal cage and an outer cage. The internal cage, when rotated using an adjustment performed with tools at the surface, operates to vary the size of the bypass orifices of the bypass valve and thus vary the bypass fluid volume. In addition a clutch within the lower part of the outer cage is used to maintain the valve push rod in a fixed position within the valve assembly until the push rod is forced to change the valve from an open (bypass) configuration to a closed (no bypass) configuration. The clutch tension is provided by a plurality of small metal coil springs wrapped around the clutch bobbin that surrounds the push rod. Some disadvantages of this design are its complexity that increases its cost and the effects of corrosion which predisposes the clutch assembly to premature failure. Another drawback is that the bypass orifices are cut at right angles through the inner and outer cages, which impedes the flow of fluid through the plunger as it descends through the tubing.
In another example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0294507, Tanton (See also U.S. Pat. No. 6,467,541, Wells) discloses two different free piston embodiments in which one or both of their components are made of materials that are at least partly buoyant. One embodiment is a simple combination of a sleeve having a seat to receive a ball at its lower end, as in a ball-check valve. In operation the ball is allowed to fall through the fluid in the well bore, followed by the sleeve at some time interval. The ball reaches the bottom of the well first. When the sleeve arrives it contacts the ball, which seals the well bore. Gas pressure can then lift the ball and sleeve together to the surface, pushing the production fluid ahead of them upward through the well bore. The other embodiment eliminates the separate ball or plug and closes the lower end of the sleeve, thus presenting a closed face to whatever material is in the well casing during descent. While simple in configuration, the first lacks predictability because the sleeve and ball operate independently until they reach the bottom of the well bore, and the second lacks broad utility because of its buoyancy and is not able to bypass fluids as it descends to the bottom of the well. Variations in the ball-check valve concept have been in the art for decades, as for example is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 2,001,012 patented May 14, 1935.
What is needed is an improved plunger bypass valve mechanism for a gas lift plunger device that is simple and durable, as well as reliable in operation and low in cost to manufacture.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a clutch assembly for a plunger lift bypass valve having an axial valve stem slidingly disposed within a valve cage attached to a plunger lift, the clutch assembly comprising a split bobbin sized to surround less than 360 degrees of the perimeter of the valve stem; a resilient tension band formed of synthetic rubber and surrounding the split bobbin; and a predetermined surface roughness applied to the valve stem. In another aspect the tension band may be configured as two or more tension bands used together.
In another embodiment there is provided an improved bypass valve assembly for a plunger lift apparatus, comprising a bypass valve cage with at least one elongated opening or port formed through a side wall of the bypass valve cage, the opening outwardly relieved at a lower end thereof; a valve stem disposed within a longitudinal bore of the valve cage and having a predetermined surface roughness; and a split bobbin clutch assembly including a resilient tension band formed of a synthetic rubber having an A Scale durometer characteristic between 60 and 90, the clutch assembly disposed around the valve stem.
In yet another embodiment of the invention there is provided a plunger lift apparatus having an improved bypass valve assembly, comprising a plunger body having a plurality of annular sealing rings and a full diameter upper body portion with shortened taper at an upper end thereof, the plunger body configured at a lower end thereof for threadable engagement with the bypass valve assembly; and a bypass valve assembly comprising a valve cage and a valve stem having a clutch assembly disposed there around, the valve stem disposed within a longitudinal bore of the valve cage, the clutch assembly configured as a split bobbin having a synthetic rubber or elastomer tension band disposed around the split bobbin, and the valve stem surface configured with a predetermined surface roughness.
The drawings that accompany the following description depict several views of a bypass valve assembly for a gas lift plunger apparatus according to one embodiment of the rotary bypass plunger apparatus provided by the present invention. It has been discovered that significant improvements can be made to the bypass valve assembly that utilizes a clutch-controlled “dart” or valve stem that reciprocates within a bypass valve “cage” and provides a mechanism for sealing the fluid passages through the bypass valve. One of the functions of the bypass valve is to allow fluid to flow through the valve in a controlled manner to control descent of the plunger assembly to the bottom of the well. Another function of the bypass valve assembly is to switch the valve configuration to seal the passages that allow the flow-through of fluid so that the plunger acts as a piston to seal the well bore and permit the gas pressure in the well to force the piston and accumulated fluids above it to the surface so that production from the well can resume.
The present invention incorporates design features that substantially improve the performance and durability of the bypass valve assembly in a gas lift plunger. Descent of the plunger assembly is faster and better controlled, which cuts the shut-in time approximately in half, thus more quickly restoring the well to production. Moreover, the superiority of the valve stem and clutch assembly configuration that is disclosed herein, which enables the switch from plunger bypass/descent to gas lift/ascent at the bottom of the well, is confirmed by performance in the field. The success of the improved design of the present invention is demonstrated by sales volume exceeding 1200 units during the first six months of its availability, without a single reported instance of failure. In addition, the reliability and durability of the plunger and the bypass valve assembly is extended by the features to be described herein, thereby reducing downtime and maintenance costs.
To achieve the aforementioned advantages, the following features are preferably and most advantageously used in combination in the bypass valve assembly described herein: (a) elongated bypass openings or ports that are relieved at the upper and lower ends at an angle to reduce turbulence and improve flow as the plunger descends, providing a smoother and a more rapid descent; (b) helical disposition of the bypass openings around the body of the bypass valve assembly to impart a torque to the plunger, causing it to spin within the well casing as it descends, ensuring more uniform wear and longer life while providing a smoother descent; (c) a valve stem clutch with an elastomeric tension band (or bands) that is more resistant to high temperatures and corrosive chemicals than metal and thus much less prone to failure; (d) calibrated surface roughness of the valve stem surface to improve the friction characteristics of the valve stem clutch as it arrives at the bottom of the well and configures the plunger for its ascent to the surface; (e) machined grooves on the inner surface of the clutch bobbin to allow sand particles to be flushed away from within the clutch, thereby preventing undesired lock-up; and (f) shortened taper of the upper end of the plunger body that utilizes the improved bypass valve assembly, to ensure a more complete seal with minimum leakage of production fluids during ascent of the plunger to the surface.
Variations in the above features are contemplated to adapt the bypass valve assembly to different well circumstances. For example, the number of bypass openings or slots may be varied to provide different flow rates. The tension in the tension band (or bands) of the clutch assembly may be varied or adjusted to adapt the clutch clamping force to different descent velocities as the plunger contacts the bumper at the well bottom. The helical pitch may be varied within narrow limits to control the amount of spin imparted to the plunger. The profile of the machined grooves in the clutch bobbin may be varied to accommodate different sand particle sizes. The surface roughness of the valve stem may be varied to optimize the friction applied by the clutch. The tapered profile of the plunger body at the upper end may be varied to optimize ascending performance with different fluid viscosities, etc. Persons skilled in the art will understand that the bypass valve assembly described herein—the assembly of the cage, valve stem and clutch—may be constructed in a variety of combinations of the above features and interchanged with other combinations to suit particular conditions of individual oil or gas wells. For example, the plunger and bypass valve assembly may be produced in several diameters for use in different size well tubing. Also, different length plungers may be provided. For example, a shorter bypass plunger is better able to negotiate well tubing that have curves or elbows, and because of its lower weight, it places less stress on the bumper spring at the bottom in wells that are relatively dry. A longer casing falls more easily through more fluid and provides a better sealing action. This adaptability is yet another advantage of the present invention. As is well known, performance of a gas lift plunger may be reduced if the configuration of the plunger is not well-matched to the conditions of a particular well.
One important component of the clutch assembly to be described herein is the elastomer tension band. In this description the use of the singular form of the term “tension band” is intended to mean that the tension band may be composed of one such band or a plurality of individual bands used together. The tension band (or bands) may be fabricated of an elastomeric material, a broad category of synthesized polymer materials that are commonly known as synthetic rubber. Among the properties required in the tension band is resistance to high temperatures and corrosion, elasticity, reversibility—ability to return to and maintain its unstressed or relaxed configuration after being stressed, and excellent stability. Some examples of such materials include neoprene, buna-N, respectively polychloroprene and acrylonitrile butadiene. An alternative is hydrogenated nitrile rubber. Another example, preferred for the present invention, is a fluoroelastomer such as a fluoronated hydrocarbon better known as Viton®, a registered trademark of the E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company or its affiliates of Wilmington, Del., USA. In particular, the preferred material will have a Shore A durometer of 60 to 90, and for most applications a Shore durometer of 75 on the A scale is preferred. In some applications where the tension band needs to be thicker or wider (greater cross sectional area), the durometer figure may be reduced. Similarly, if the tension band needs to be thinner or narrower (lesser cross sectional area), the durometer figure should be increased.
When installed on the valve stem, the split bobbin segments are disposed around the valve stem shaft, held in a clamping action against the valve stem shaft by the action of the elastomer tension band. The elastomer tension band has been found during tests to provide superior durability in down-hole conditions to other ways such as metal springs to provide the needed clamping force. The clamping force provided by the tension band resists by friction of the bobbin segment against the valve stem the movement of the valve stem through the clutch assembly. This friction arises because of the clamping force from the tension band and the predetermined surface roughness formed into the surface of the valve stem shaft along the greater portion of its length. The function of the clutch assembly is to ensure that the valve stem remains in either (a) the lower-most position within the valve cage during descent of the plunger so that the plunger will fall freely through the fluid in the well casing and cause it to rotate smoothly during the descent; and (b) the upper-most position within the valve cage during ascent of the plunger to seal the bypass valve assembly so that the gas pressure in the well will cause the plunger to rise through the well casing, pushing the production ahead of it. The clutch assembly enables the valve stem to be held in the appropriate position during descent and ascent, and also to change the position of the valve stem from the lower-most position to the upper-most position when the plunger reaches the bottom of the well to configure the plunger for its ascent.
In the drawings to be described each structural feature is identified with a reference number. A feature bearing the same reference number in more than one figure may be assumed to be the same feature. Turning now to
The rotary bypass valve assembly 14 (also: bypass valve 14) includes a valve cage 30, and end cap 34, and a valve stem 102. The body 32 of the valve cage 30 may be threaded (See
Also clearly visible in
Continuing with
Preferred materials for fabricating the rotary bypass plunger 10 described herein include the use of type 416 heat treated stainless steel for the bypass valve stem 102 and the clutch bobbin segments 72A/72B. The remaining parts—plunger body 16, valve cage 30, and end cap 34 may be fabricated of type 4140 heat treated alloy steel. In alternative embodiments, the 416 heat treated stainless steel may be used to fabricate all of these parts. Both materials are readily available as solid “rounds” in a variety of diameters, as is well known in the art.
This nominal 45° angle results in an inward slope of the ends 54, 56 of the port 46 with both ends 54, 56 oriented toward the upper end 18 of the bypass plunger 10 as it is positioned within a well casing. This relief of the ends 54, 56 of the port 46 facilitates the flow of fluid through the port(s) 46 as the bypass plunger 10 falls through the well casing by gravity. In alternate embodiments, this nominal angle of 45° may be varied to suit a particular implementation of the bypass valve assembly 14. For example, the angle may be different at opposite ends of the port(s) 46, they may be larger or smaller acute angles relative to the longitudinal axis 60, the angled surfaces may be rounded in profile for even smoother flow through the port(s) 46, etc. An additional relieved area, called ramp 58, further smooths the path for fluid flow at the lower end 54 of each port 46.
The surface of the ramp 58 shown in
Continuing with
The combination of the helical orientation of the ports 46, preferably disposed at several uniform radial positions around the body of the valve cage 30, each having the relieved ends 54, 56, 58, provides a rotary gas lift plunger that outperforms known bypass plungers by providing smoother, faster descent along with more uniform wear and extended life in the field.
Continuing with
Also depicted in
Moreover, the synthetic rubber material used in the tension band 76 is essentially impervious to the corrosive effects of most of the materials in the fluids found in oil and gas wells. These properties are unlike the use of small diameter coil springs, for example, which, being made of metal, are susceptible to such corrosion. Such corrosion requires additional maintenance—and down time—to replace and restore the tension of the springs or other metal components used to provide the necessary tension in the clutch 70. The tension band 76 is preferably fabricated of a synthetic rubber material having a durometer of between 60 and 90 on the Shore “A” Scale. This requirement provides for sufficient tension when the tension band 76 is stretched over the rims 82, 84 of the split bobbin 72 to secure the clutch assembly 70 around the valve stem 102. In the embodiments described herein, the clutch assembly 70 is designed to resist a linear pull on the valve stem 102 of approximately 2.8 to 3.6 lb. in this example, although adjustments to the tension may generally vary from 1.0 to 6.0 lb. in other examples but are not so limited because some applications mat require the clutch to satisfy clamping forces beyond this range. The performance of the clutch assembly 70 is also dependent on the finish applied to the valve stem 62, as will be described with
Suitable materials for the tension band 76 for the clutch assembly 70 include neoprene and buna-N, respectively polychloroprene and acrylonitrile butadiene. An alternative is hydrogenated nitrile rubber. Another example, preferred for the present invention, is a fluoroelastomer such as a fluoronated hydrocarbon better known as Viton®, a registered trademark of the E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company or its affiliates of Wilmington, Del., USA. In particular, the preferred material will have a Shore A durometer of 60 to 90, and for most applications a Shore durometer of 75 on the A scale has been found to work the best.
In other embodiments, the bobbin may be lengthened to cover a greater portion of the valve stem 102. Further, the bobbin may be split into three or more segments (not shown), although two segments are adequate for this purpose and somewhat simpler to manufacture and handle during assembly. The split bobbin 130 illustrated in
Continuing with
Also depicted in
The materials suitable for the tension bands 134, 136 in
Returning now to
While the invention has been shown in only one of its forms, it is not thus limited but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/871,642 filed Apr. 26, 2013 by the same inventors and entitled PLUNGER LIFT APPARATUS, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/720,451 filed Oct. 31, 2012 by the same inventors and entitled PLUNGER LIFT APPARATUS.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1932992 | Sherman et al. | Oct 1933 | A |
2001012 | Burgher | May 1935 | A |
2001552 | Scott | May 1935 | A |
2013111 | Scott | Sep 1935 | A |
2018204 | Evans et al. | Oct 1935 | A |
2237408 | Burgher | Apr 1941 | A |
2301319 | Peters | Nov 1942 | A |
2312789 | Appleby | Mar 1943 | A |
2539000 | Williams | Jan 1951 | A |
2642002 | Knox et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
2661024 | Knox | Dec 1953 | A |
2676547 | Knox | Apr 1954 | A |
2699121 | Knox | Jan 1955 | A |
2714855 | Brown | Aug 1955 | A |
2821142 | Knox | Jan 1958 | A |
2878754 | McMurry | Mar 1959 | A |
2884861 | Vincent et al. | May 1959 | A |
2918015 | Knox | Dec 1959 | A |
2962978 | Reeves | Dec 1960 | A |
2970547 | McMurry | Feb 1961 | A |
3012513 | Knox | Dec 1961 | A |
3020852 | Roach et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
3031971 | Roach | May 1962 | A |
3082825 | Hanner, Sr. | Mar 1963 | A |
3090315 | Milton | May 1963 | A |
3095819 | Brown et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3146725 | Harris | Sep 1964 | A |
3147808 | McCarvell et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3329211 | Roach | Jul 1967 | A |
3473611 | Gregston | Oct 1969 | A |
3601191 | McMurray | Aug 1971 | A |
3827491 | Dinning | Aug 1974 | A |
3968839 | Swihart, Sr. | Jul 1976 | A |
4150721 | Norwood | Apr 1979 | A |
4211279 | Isaacks | Jul 1980 | A |
4352376 | Norwood | Oct 1982 | A |
4410300 | Yerian | Oct 1983 | A |
4417858 | Stout | Nov 1983 | A |
4451209 | Phillips | May 1984 | A |
4502843 | Martin | Mar 1985 | A |
4596516 | Scott et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4889473 | Krueger | Dec 1989 | A |
4898235 | Enright | Feb 1990 | A |
4921048 | Crow et al. | May 1990 | A |
4923372 | Ferguson et al. | May 1990 | A |
5132904 | Lamp | Jul 1992 | A |
5146991 | Rogers, Jr. | Sep 1992 | A |
5253713 | Gregg et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5427504 | Dinning et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5551512 | Smith | Sep 1996 | A |
5984013 | Giacomino et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6041874 | Lee | Mar 2000 | A |
6045335 | Dinning | Apr 2000 | A |
6059040 | Levitan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6148923 | Casey | Nov 2000 | A |
6176309 | Bender | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6209637 | Wells | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6354373 | Vercaemer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6467541 | Wells | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6644399 | Abbott et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6688385 | Moe | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6719060 | Wells | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7128170 | Russell et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7270187 | Shulyatikov et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7383878 | Victor | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7438125 | Victor | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7669651 | Carstensen | Mar 2010 | B1 |
8181706 | Tanton | May 2012 | B2 |
8464798 | Nadkrynechny | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8627892 | Nadkrynechny | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9068443 | Jefferies | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20030155117 | Gray et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040026085 | Vacik et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040168832 | Russell et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050161212 | Leismer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050178543 | Giacomino | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050230105 | Valenti | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230119 | McGarian et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230120 | Victor | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050241819 | Victor | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050274527 | Misselbrook et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060024928 | Seebauer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054329 | Chisholm | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060185853 | Bender | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070267189 | Wells | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090020293 | Richards | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100294507 | Tanton | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2070278 | Dec 1996 | RU |
63138 | Nov 1943 | SU |
171351 | Jan 1965 | SU |
182634 | Jan 1966 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,642, filed Apr. 26, 2013, pp. 1-8. |
Author Unknown, “Installing Plunger Lift Systems In Gas Wells”, Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners United States Environmental Protection Agency, Oct. 2006, pp. 1-14. |
E. Beauregard et al., “Introduction to Plunger Lift: Application, Advantages and Limitations”, Presented at the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, Apr. 23-24, 1981, pp. 1-10. |
Dan Phillips et al., “Plunger lift with wellhead compression boosts gas well production”, World Oil, Oct. 1986, pp. 96-100. |
Dan Phillips et al., “How to optimize production from plunger lift systems”, World Oil, Apr. 1998, pp. 110-120. |
Dan Phillips et al., “How to optimize production from plunger lift systems”, World Oil, May 1998, pp. 67-72. |
A.A. Popov, “Experience in Introducing Plunger Lift at Fields of the Ukhta Complex”, Gazovoe delo, No. 9, 1968, pp. 23-26. |
I. Shulyatikov et al., “Removing Liquid from Gas Wells by Well Shuttles”, Corrosion & Prevention—2001, Sep. 29-Oct. 2, 2002, pp. 1-7. |
James Lea et al., “Gas Well Dequalification Solutions to Gas Well Liquid Loading Problems”, Gulf Drilling Guides, 2003, pp. 1-321. |
James Lea et al., “Gas Well Dequalification Second Edition”, Gulf Drilling Guides, 2008, pp. 1-605. |
G.V. Chilingarian et al., “surface operations in petroleum production, I”, Developments in Petroleum Science, 19A, 1987, pp. 466-476, 515-517, and 529-530. |
Author Unknown, Pacemaker Plungers, IPS Pacemaker, brochure, no print date available, pp. 1-2. |
Author Unknown, Plunger Lift Systems, NOV Monoflo, 2013, pp. 1-8. |
Author Unknown, IPS (Integrated Production Services) Catalog, pp. 1-42. |
Arie Janssens et al., Clinton Sandstone Papers, Presented at The Ohio Oil and Gas Association Winter Meetings 1961 to 1978, Abridged Reprint, 1985, pp. 1-215. |
Author Unknown, “How to Make More Production with Plunger Lift”, Harbison-Fischer Opti-Miser Well Control System, Developing Unconventional Gas Technical Workshop, Mar. 29, 2010, pp. 1-29. |
David Cosby, P.E., “Introduction to Plunger Lift”, Gas Well Dequalification Workshop, Feb. 24-26, 2014, pp. 1-43. |
Divyakumar O. Garg, B.E., “New Modeling Techniques for Two-Piece Plunger Lift Components”, A Thesis in Petroleum Engineering, Texas Tech Univerisity, Dec. 2004, pp. 1-103. |
Author Unknown, Subsurface Equipment—Plungers, Ferguson Beauregard, web page, http://www.fbdover.com/products/plungers/subsurface-equipment, accessed Mar. 27, 2014, 1 page. |
Author Unknown, Shuttle Ball Plunger, Pro-Seal Lift Systems, 2013, http://prosealinc.com/plunger-lift/suttle-ball-plunger/, accessed Feb. 21, 2014, 1 page. |
Author Uknown, Bypass Plungers, Pro-Seal Lift Systems, 2013, http://prosealinc.com/plunger-lift/bypass-vs-non-bypass/, accessed Feb. 21, 2014, 1 page. |
Author Unknown, “Which plunger is right for my well?”, Shale Tec, LLC, 2014, http://www.shaletec.com/faq/which-plunger-is-right-for-my-well/, accessed Feb. 21, 2014, pp. 1-4. |
Shulyatikov et al., “Improved Technology of Removing Liquid from Wells of Gas and Gas-Condensate Fields at Declining Production Period by Flying Valves”, 22nd World Gas Conference, 2003, pp. 1-4. |
G.I. Zadora, “Gas Production Operator”, Recommended by the Central Scientific and Methodological Office of the Ministry of Gas Industry as a Textbook to Train and Develop Industry Personnel, Moscow, Nedra, 1980, pp. 1-10 (including translation). |
Lufkin, “Plunger Lift Systems, International Lift Systems”, website products brochure; copyright 2011, www.lufkin.com, 28 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Flow-Thru Plungers”, PCS/Production Control Services, product website, www.pcslift.com, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150300136 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61720451 | Oct 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13871642 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14754382 | US |