Patent Application
20150064217
The present disclosure relates to treating cancers derived from each of the embryonic germ layers, screening subjects suitable for treatment, compositions of matter, methods and kits.
Cancer is distinguished by the lack of effective immune response against the cancer. Lack of immune response can result, for example, from the fact that many tumor antigens are “self-antigens,” from lack of expression of MHC by the tumor cells and consequent lack of presentation of tumor antigens by the tumor cells, from the association of macrophages with tumors where the macrophages express cytokines that reduce immune response, and from the immunosuppressive activity of T regulatory cells (Tregs). Lack of immune response against tumors also results from the fact that tumor cells tend not to express molecules that stimulate innate immune response, that is, molecules that stimulate toll-like receptors (TLRs) or nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors). Cancer encompasses solid tumors as well as the hematological cancers, such as the leukemias and the myelodysplastic syndromes.
The embryonic germ layers are endoderm, mesoderm, ectoderm, and neural crest. Neural crest is derived from ectoderm, but is sometimes considered to be a fourth germ layer. Neoplastic cells can be identified as being derived from one of these germ layers. For example, breast cancer, sarcoma, and colon cancer, arise in tissues derived from embryonic ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm, respectively (Singer et al (1997) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol. 82:1917-1922). The present disclosure provides reagents that stimulate immune response against cancers derived from tissues arising from each of the embryonic germ layers, as well as against tumors of mixed embryological origin.
The immune system encompasses cellular immunity, humoral immunity, and complement response. Cellular immunity includes a network of cells and events involving dendritic cells, CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T cells; cytotoxic lymphocytes), and CD4+ T cells (helper T cells). Dendritic cells (DCs) acquire polypeptide antigens, where these antigens can be acquired from outside of the DC, or biosynthesized inside of the DC by an infecting organism. The DC processes the polypeptide, resulting in peptides of about ten amino acids in length, transfers the peptides to either MHC class I or MHC class II to form a complex, and shuttles the complex to the surface of the DC. When a DC bearing a MHC class I/peptide complex contacts a CD8+ T cell, the result is activation and proliferation of the CD8+ T cell. Regarding the role of MHC class II, when a DC bearing a MHC class II/peptide complex contacts a CD4+ T cell, the outcome is activation and proliferation of the CD4+ T cell (Munz, et al. (2010) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 22:89-93; Monaco (1995) J. Leukocyte Biol. 57:543-547; Robinson, et al (2002) Immunology 105:252-262). Although dendritic cells presenting antigen to a T cell can “activate” that T cell, the activated T cell might not be capable of mounting an effective immune response. Effective immune response by the CD8+ T cell often requires prior stimulation of the DC by one or more of a number of interactions. These interactions include direct contact of a CD4+ T cell to the DC (by way of contact the CD4+ T cell's CD40 ligand to the DC's CD40 receptor), or direct contact of a TLR agonist to one of the dendritic cell's toll-like receptors (TLRs).
Humoral immunity refers to B cells and antibodies. B cells become transformed to plasma cells, and the plasma cells express and secrete antibodies. Naïve B cells are distinguished in that they do not express the marker CD27, while antigen-specific B cells do express CD27 (Perez-Andres, et al. (2010) Cytometry Part B 78B (Suppl. 1) S47-S60). The secreted antibodies can subsequently bind to tumor antigens residing on the surface of tumor cells. The result is that the infected cells or tumor cells become tagged with the antibody. With binding of the antibody to the infected cell or tumor cell, the bound antibody mediates killing of the infected cell or tumor cell, where killing is by NK cells. Although NK cells are not configured to recognize specific target antigens, in the way that T cells are configured to recognize target antigens, the ability of NK cells to bind to the constant region of antibodies, enables NK cells to specifically kill the cells that are tagged with antibodies. The NK cell's recognition of the antibodies is mediated by Fc receptor (of the NK cell) binding to the Fc portion of the antibody. This type of killing is called, antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC). NK cells can also kill cells independent of the mechanism of ADCC, where this killing requires expression of MHC class I to be lost or deficient in the target cell (see, e.g., Caligiuri (2008) Blood 112:461-469).
The technique of “delayed type hypersensitivity response” can be used to distinguish between immune responses that mainly involve cellular immunity or mainly involve humoral immunity. A positive signal from the delayed type hypersensitivity response indicates a cellular response (see, e.g., Roychowdhury, et al. (2005) AAPS J. E834-E846).
Autophagy is a homeostatic process by which cytosolic components and organelles are delivered to the lysosome for degradation. Autophagy is also associated with innate and adaptive immune responses to intracellular pathogens whereby cytosolic antigens are loaded onto major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules for CD4+ T-cell recognition.
As used herein, including the appended claims, the singular forms of words such as “a,” “an,” and “the” include their corresponding plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. All references cited herein are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, published patent application, and sequence listing, as well as figures and drawings in said publications and patent documents, was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure provides a population of mammalian dendritic cells comprising: cancer-specific peptides from cancer cells taken from a subject that has a cancer; wherein the cancer-specific peptides are acquired in vitro by dendritic cells from said cancer cells; wherein the cancer cells are not treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein the majority of the cancer cells are not treated in vitro with a interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein less than about 40 percent of the cancer cells are treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein less than about 30 percent of the cancer cells are treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein less than about 20 percent of the cancer cells are treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein less than about 10 percent of the cancer cells are treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein less than about 5 percent of the cancer cells are treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein less than about 1% percent of the cancer cells are treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein greater than 60 percent (%) of said cancer cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, are autophagic and non-apoptotic, and wherein the dendritic cells and cancer cells are from the same subject; wherein greater than 70 percent (%) of said cancer cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, are autophagic and non-apoptotic, and wherein the dendritic cells and cancer cells are from the same subject; wherein greater than 80 percent (%) of said cancer cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, are autophagic and non-apoptotic, and wherein the dendritic cells and cancer cells are from the same subject; wherein greater than 90 percent (%) of said cancer cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, are autophagic and non-apoptotic, and wherein the dendritic cells and cancer cells are from the same subject.
In some exemplars wherein IFN-gamma is required to not be added the disclosure refers to significant or substantial amounts. The requirement, stated in a different way, is that at least 60% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In some instances, at least 70% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In some instances, at least 80% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In some instances, at least 90% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In some instances, at least 95% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In some instances, at least 98% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In some instances, at least 99% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In some instances, at least 100% of the cancer cells are not treated (or exposed to) IFN-gamma. In the above context, “treated” and “exposed” refer to exogenously added IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic. Thus, where an instruction or protocol mandates that at least 60% of the cancer cells are not treated, a user who follows that protocol and who treats only 30% of the cells in IFN-gamma, will have complied successfully with the requirements of the protocol. However, where the user who follows the protocol makes a mistake and treats 62% of the cells with IFN-gamma, the user will have failed to meet the requirements of the protocol. The present disclosure does not set forth any particular concentration of the added IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic or the amount of cancer cells treated or not treated. The present disclosure does not set forth any particular time frame of exposure, where the added IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic contact cancer cells. The present disclosure does not set forth any requirement for efficacy of the added IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic.
The present disclosure provides a population of mammalian dendritic cells comprising: cancer-specific peptides from cancer cells taken from a subject that has a cancer; wherein the cancer-specific peptides are acquired in vitro by dendritic cells from said cancer cells; wherein the cancer cells are not treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with IFN-gamma mimetic; wherein greater than 60 percent (%), or greater than 70%, or greater than 80%, or greater than 90%, or greater than 95%, or greater than 98%, or greater than 99%, of said cancer cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, are autophagic and non-apoptotic, and wherein the dendritic cells and cancer cells are from the same subject.
In those instances where IFN-gamma is required to be added such as a population of dendritic cells from a subject comprising: cancer-specific peptides from cancer cells taken from a subject that has a cancer, wherein said cancer-specific peptides are acquired in vitro by dendritic cells from said cancer cells that are treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, wherein greater than 60 percent (%) of said cancer cells that are treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are autophagic and non-apoptotic, and wherein the dendritic cells and cancer cells are from the same subject. In other embodiments, what can be required is greater than 65%, greater than 70%, greater than 75%, greater than 80%, greater than 90%, greater than 95%, greater than 98%, greater than 99%, or 100%, of the cancer cells are autophagic and non-apoptotic. While the above exemplary protocol (where IFN-gamma is required to be added) does not expressly set forth a requirement for the percentage of the total cancer cells that are treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, does not set forth any requirement for concentration of IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, does not set forth any requirement that added IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic have any particular level of efficacy on the cancer cells. However, in alternate exemplary embodiments (where IFN-gamma is required to be added), what can be required is that at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, at least 99%, or 100%, of the cancer cells be exposed to (or be contacted with) the exogenously added IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic. The “population” can be defined in terms of residence in a flask, beaker, bioreactor, well of a titer plate, all wells of a given titer plate, bottle, lot number, particular tumor biopsy where the cancer cells originated, date and time at which a particular batch of cancer cells was first subjected to maintenance culture or to growth culture, and the like. In exclusionary embodiments, the present disclosure can exclude cells, cancer cells, dendritic cells, or dendritic cells treated with tumor antigen, that are not from the desired flask, beaker, bioreactor, specific tumor biopsy, maintenance culture batch, growth culture batch, and the like.
Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein the cancer is from a tissue of one or more of endodermal origin, mesodermal origin, or ectodermal origin. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein the cancer is from a tissue of neural crest origin, and wherein the neural crest is of ectodermal origin. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein the cancer is from a tissue of one or more of endodermal origin, mesodermal origin, or ectodermal origin, and where the cancer is melanoma of neural crest origin, colon cancer of endoderm origin, renal cancer of mesoderm origin, glioblastoma of ectoderm origin, or ovarian cancer of mixed mesoderm plus extra-embryonic origin.
Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein greater than 80% of said cancer cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, are autophagic and non-apoptotic. Also provided is a vaccine for the above subject, comprising the above population of dendritic cells. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells of, wherein essentially all of the cancer cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are incapable of cell division. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein essentially all of the cancer cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are irradiated and incapable of cell division. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein at least 80% of the cancer cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are irradiated and incapable of cell division. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells of, wherein at least 80% of the cancer cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are treated with a nucleic acid cross-linker and are incapable of cell division.
Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells of claim 1 that comprise one or more peptides derived from a melanoma-specific antigen that is S-100, HMB-45, Mel-2, Melan-A, Mel-5, MAGE-1, MART-1, or Tyrosinase, and wherein the cancer is melanoma. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein the given subject is a human subject. Also provided is the above population of dendritic cells, wherein the given subject is a mammal that is not human. In a vaccine embodiment, what is provided is a cancer vaccine comprising: at least one mature dendritic cell from a subject that has cancer; wherein the at least one mature dendritic cell had been contacted with at least one cancer tumor cell from the same subject, wherein the at least cancer tumor cell that is contacted with the at least one mature dendritic cell is non-dividing, autophagic, and non-apoptotic. Also provided is a method for stimulating immune response against a cancer-specific antigen, comprising administering an immune-stimulatory amount of the above population of dendritic cells to the subject.
Also provided is the above method, wherein the immune response that is stimulated comprises one or more of CD4+ T cell response, CD8+ T cell response, and B cell response. Also provided is the above method, wherein the CD4+ T cell response, CD8+ T cell response, or B cell response, can be measured by ELISPOT assays, by intracellular cytokine staining assays, by tetramer assays, or by detecting antigen-specific antibody production. Also provided is the above method, wherein the immune response comprises a survival time that comprises 2-year overall survival (OS), and where the 2-year overall survival is at least 60%. Also provided is the above method, wherein the administration comprises subcutaneous injections of the vaccine. Also provided is the above method, wherein the administration comprises injections of the vaccine given weekly for three months and then monthly for five months. Also provided is the a method for preparing a dendritic cell vaccine, involving cancer cells and dendritic cells from the same subject, the method comprising: one or more cancer cells is treated with an agent that prevents cell division; the one or more cancer cells are not treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with an IFN-gamma mimetic; cancer cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic are selected; cancer cells that are non-autophagic and apoptotic are rejected; and, wherein the cancer cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic are provided to one or more autologous dendritic cells, or, wherein peptides derived from the cancer cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic are provided to one or more autologous dendritic cells.
The following provides a composition embodiment. What is provided is a composition comprising: at least one cancer cell that is not treated with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) from a first subject, and at least one antigen presenting cell (APC) from the same first subject, wherein the cancer cell is: autophagic; and non-apoptotic. Also provided is the above composition, wherein the cancer cell is MHC class II-expressing. Also provided is the above composition, wherein the APC is a dendritic cell, a macrophage, or a B cell. Also provided is the above composition, wherein the at least one cancer cell comprises cancer-specific peptides, and wherein the cancer specific-peptides are substantially not contained in said APCs and are substantially not processed by said APCs. Also provided is the above composition, wherein the cancer cells comprise cancer-specific peptides, and wherein the cancer specific-peptides are substantially contained in said APCs and are partially or substantially processed in said APCs.
Also provided is the above composition, wherein the cancer cell is loaded into the APC. Also provided is the above composition, wherein the cancer cell is not loaded into the APC. Also provided is the above composition, wherein autophagy is demonstrated by a test that assays microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3). Also provided is the above composition, wherein the cells are demonstrated to be non-apoptotic using at least one of the reagent, 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-ADD), or the reagent, annexin. In a methods embodiment, what is provided is a method of stimulating immune response in a subject having a cancer and comprising cancer cells, wherein the subject is the same subject as the first subject, comprising administering an immunology effective amount of the above composition. Also provided is the above composition, wherein at least 90% of the cancer cells are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma, and less than 10% of the cancer cells are treated in vitro with IFN-gamma.
The following provides a method of manufacturing embodiment. What is provided is a method for manufacturing the above vaccine or the above composition, comprising contacting at least one cancer tumor cell to at least one antigen presenting cell (APC), wherein the at least one cancer tumor cell is from a first human subject, and wherein the at least one APC is from the same first human subject. What is also provided, is a method for preparing a dendritic cell vaccine, comprising: treating cancer cells acquired from a first subject with an agent that prevents cell division; wherein the cancer cells are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or an IFN-gamma mimetic; selecting cancer cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic; and, contacting the selected cancer cells with autologous dendritic cells from the same first subject. What is also provided, is a composition that comprises a dendritic cell vaccine, as prepared by the above method. Also, what is provided is a method for stimulating immune response against a cancer-specific antigen, comprising administering the above composition to a subject that has cancer.
Disclosed is a population of mammalian dendritic cells comprising melanoma-specific peptides from a given subject that has melanoma and comprises melanoma cells; wherein said melanoma-specific peptides are acquired in vitro by dendritic cells from said melanoma cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic, wherein greater than 60 percent (%) of said melanoma cells that are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are autophagic and non-apoptotic, and wherein the dendritic cells and melanoma cells are from the same subject.
Also disclosed is the above population of mammalian dendritic cells, wherein: greater than 80% of said melanoma cells are autophagic and non-apoptotic.
What is disclosed are the above dendritic cells, wherein essentially all of the melanoma cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are incapable of cell division; as well as the above dendritic cells wherein essentially all of the melanoma cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are irradiated and incapable of cell division; as well as the above dendritic cells, wherein at least 80% of the melanoma cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are irradiated and incapable of cell division; as well as the above dendritic cells wherein at least 80% of the melanoma cells that are not treated with IFN-gamma or IFN-gamma mimetic are treated with a nucleic acid cross-linker and are incapable of cell division.
Also disclosed is a vaccine comprising the above population of the above mammalian dendritic cells.
Also disclosed, are the above dendritic cells, wherein essentially all of the melanoma-specific peptides are from melanoma cells that are incapable of cell division
Furthermore, what is disclosed are the above dendritic cells, wherein essentially all of the melanoma-specific peptides are from melanoma cells that are incapable of cell division because the melanoma cells are irradiated.
Disclosed are the above dendritic cells, wherein essentially all of the melanoma-specific peptides are from melanoma cells that are incapable of cell division because the chromosomes of the melanoma cells are cross-linked by a nucleic acid cross-linking agent.
Also disclosed are the above dendritic cells, comprising melanoma-specific peptides that are from melanoma cells that are treated with radiation.
Disclosed are the above dendritic cells, comprising melanoma-specific peptides, wherein all of said peptides are from melanoma cells that are treated with radiation.
Also disclosed are the above dendritic cells, that comprise one or more peptides derived from a melanoma-specific antigen that S-100, HMB-45, Mel-2, Melan-A, Mel-5, MAGE-1, MART-1, or Tyrosinase.
What is disclosed, are the above dendritic cells, wherein essentially all of the melanoma-specific peptides are from melanoma cells that are treated in vitro to be incapable of cell division.
Also disclosed, are the above dendritic cells, wherein the given subject is a human subject.
Disclosed are the above dendritic cells, wherein the given subject is a mammal that is not human.
Disclosed is a melanoma vaccine comprising at least one mature dendritic cell from a subject that has melanoma, wherein the at least one mature dendritic cell had been contacted with at least one melanoma tumor cell from the same subject, wherein the at least melanoma tumor cell that is contacted with the at least one mature dendritic cell is non-dividing, autophagic, and non-apoptotic.
Also disclosed is a method for stimulating immune response against a melanoma-specific antigen, comprising administering an immune-stimulatory amount of the dendritic cells of claim 1 to a subject.
What is disclosed is wherein the subject has melanoma and does comprise melanoma cells.
What is disclosed is the above method, wherein the immune response that is stimulated comprises one or more of CD4+ T cell response, CD8+ T cell response, and B cell response.
What is disclosed is the above method, wherein the CD4+ T cell response, CD8+ T cell response, or B cell response, can be measured by ELISPOT assays, by intracellular cytokine staining assays, by tetramer assays, or by detecting antigen-specific antibody production.
Also disclosed is the above method, wherein the immune response comprises a survival time that comprises 2-year overall survival (OS), and where the 2-year overall survival is at least 60%.
What is disclosed is the above method, wherein the administration comprises subcutaneous injections of the vaccine.
What is disclosed is the above method, wherein the administration comprises injections of the vaccine given weekly for three months and then monthly for five months.
Also disclosed is the above method for preparing a dendritic cell vaccine, involving melanoma cells and dendritic cells from the same subject, the method comprising: one or more melanoma cells is treated with an agent that prevents cell division; the one or more melanoma cells are not treated in vitro with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) or with an IFN-gamma mimetic; melanoma cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic are selected; melanoma cells that are non-autophagic and apoptotic are rejected; and, wherein the melanoma cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic are provided to one or more autologous dendritic cells, or, wherein peptides derived from the melanoma cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic are provided to one or more autologous dendritic cells.
What is disclosed is a composition comprising: at least one melanoma cell that is not treated with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) from a first subject, and at least one antigen presenting cell (APC) from the same first subject, wherein the melanoma cell is: autophagic; and non-apoptotic.
Also, what is disclosed is the above composition, wherein the melanoma cell is MHC class II-expressing.
Also disclosed is the above composition, wherein the APC is a dendritic cell, a macrophage, or a B cell.
Disclosed is the above composition, wherein the at least one melanoma cell comprises melanoma-specific peptides, and wherein the melanoma specific-peptides are substantially not contained in said APCs and are substantially not processed by said APCs.
Also disclosed is the above composition, where the melanoma cells comprise melanoma-specific peptides, and wherein the melanoma specific-peptides are substantially contained in said APCs and are partially or substantially processed in said APCs. Also disclosed is the above composition, wherein the melanoma cell is loaded into the APC. What is disclosed is the above composition wherein the melanoma cells are not loaded into the APC.
Disclosed is the above composition, wherein autophagy is demonstrated by a test that assays microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3).
Disclosed is the above composition, wherein the cells are demonstrated to be non-apoptotic using at least one of the reagent, 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-ADD), or the reagent, annexin.
What is disclosed is a method of stimulating immune response in a subject having melanoma and comprising melanoma cells, wherein the subject is the same subject as the first subject, comprising administering an immunology effective amount of the above composition.
What is disclosed is the above composition, wherein at least 90% of the melanoma cells are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma, and less than 10% of the melanoma cells are treated in vitro with IFN-gamma.
What is disclosed is a method for manufacturing the above vaccine or the above composition, comprising contacting at least one melanoma tumor cell to at least one antigen presenting cell (APC), wherein the at least one melanoma tumor cell is from a first human subject, and wherein the at least one APC is from the same first human subject.
What is disclosed is a method for preparing a dendritic cell vaccine, comprising: treating melanoma cells acquired from a first subject with an agent that prevents cell division; wherein the melanoma cells are not treated in vitro with IFN-gamma or an IFN-gamma mimetic; selecting melanoma cells that are autophagic and non-apoptotic; and, contacting the selected melanoma cells with autologous dendritic cells from the same first subject.
What is disclosed is a composition that comprises a dendritic cell vaccine, as prepared by the above method.
Disclosed is a method for stimulating immune response against a melanoma-specific antigen, comprising administering the above composition to a subject that has melanoma.
Disclosed is a composition comprising at least one melanoma cell from a first subject, and at least one antigen presenting cell (APCs) from the same first subject, wherein the melanoma cell is: autophagic; non-apoptotic; and MHC class II-expressing. In the present disclosure an IFN-gamma-treated melanoma cell is not loaded into the APC, and wherein an IFN-gamma treated melanoma cell is not loaded into the APC. In another aspect, what is embraced is the above composition wherein the melanoma cell is from a subject with Stage I, Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV melanoma. Additionally, what is contemplated is the above composition, related kits, and related methods, wherein the APC comprises at least one dendritic cell.
In one aspect, the pharmaceutical composition, reagent, and related methods, of the present disclosure uses a preparation of cancer cells that, is 7-AAD negative and annexin V negative. This population can be, e.g., about 99% 7-AAD negative and about 99% annexin V negative, or at least 95% 7-AAD negative and at least 95% annexin V negative, or at least 90% 7-AAD negative and at least 90% annexin V negative, to provide non-limiting examples.
Furthermore, what is embraced is the above composition, wherein autophagy is demonstrated by a test that assays microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3); and the above composition, wherein the cells are demonstrated to be non-apoptotic using at least one of the reagent, 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD), or the reagent, annexin.
In methods aspects, what is provided a method of manufacturing the above-disclosed composition, comprising removing at least one melanoma cell from the first subject, removing at least one APC from the first subject, and allowing the melanoma cell to contact the APC; as well as a method for stimulating immune response against a melanoma in a subject or patient, comprising administering the above composition of to a subject.
In a kit aspect, the present disclosure provides a kit for testing immune response against a tumor antigen in a subject, wherein the subject is treated by one or more of the above methods, and wherein the kit comprises a reagent that detects humoral immune response, cellular immune response, or innate immune response.
Immune-stimulatory amount, without limitation, can be an amount that increases ELISPOT assay results by a measurable amount, that increases ICS assay results by a measurable amount, that increases tetramer assay results by a measurable amount, that increases the blood population of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells by a measurable amount, that increases the blood population of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by a measurable amount, or where the increase is by at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 1.5-fold, 2.0-fold, 3.0-fold, and the like, when compared to a suitable control. A suitable control can be a control vaccine, where dendritic cells are not loaded with melanoma cells, or are not loaded with peptide derived from melanoma cells.
Where a particular sentence repeatedly refers to a “cancer,” it will be assumed, unless specified otherwise, that the cancer is the same type of cancer. For example, where it is recited that, “cancer-specific peptides from cancer cells taken from a subject that has a cancer,” it means the following. If the subject with the cancer has melanoma, the peptides are melanoma-specific peptides, and that the cancer cells are melanoma cells.
The term “melanoma-specific antigen,” to provide the non-limiting example of melanoma, encompasses antigens that are frequently associated with melanoma, and where the antigen is considered to be unique to melanoma, as opposed to being associated with other cancers, and in addition, the term “melanoma-specific antigens” encompasses antigens that are frequently associated with melanoma, and where the antigen is also associated with other types of cancer, such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and the like.
“Irradiated,” in the context of irradiating melanoma cells for the present disclosure, is preferably by gamma-irradiation, but also encompasses irradiation by x-rays, electrons, neutrons, protons, electromagnetic irradiation, visible light, ultraviolet light, and so on. In one aspect, the irradiation functions to prevent cell division of the melanoma cells. In another aspect, the irradiation prevents cell division, but also denatures cellular proteins. As an alternative to irradiation, the present disclosure prevents cell division of melanoma cells by way of physical disruption, e.g., sonication, cavitation, dehydration, ion depletion, or by toxicity from exposure to one or more salts.
The term “percent,” as in “greater than 60% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the number of peptide molecules, and not to the number of different antigenically distinct peptides. The term “percent,” as in “greater than 80% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the number of peptide molecules, and not to the number of different antigenically distinct peptides. The term “percent,” as in “less than 40% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the number of peptide molecules, and not to the number of antigenically distinct peptides. The term “percent,” as in “less than 20% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the number of peptide molecules, and not to the number of antigenically distinct peptides, and the like.
The term “peptides,” as in “greater than 60% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the sum of the number of peptide molecules, oligopeptides molecules, and polypeptide molecules. The term “peptides,” as in “greater than 80% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the sum of the number of peptide molecules, oligopeptides molecules, and polypeptide molecules. The term, “peptides,” as in “less than 40% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the sum of the number of peptide molecules, oligopeptides molecules, and polypeptide molecules. The term, “peptides,” as in “less than 20% of the melanoma-specific peptides,” refers to the sum of the number of peptide molecules, oligopeptides molecules, and polypeptide molecules, and the like.
“Derived from,” in the context of peptides derived from one or more cancer cells, encompasses the following. The cancer cell can be broken, for example, by a homogenizer or by osmotic bursting, resulting in a crude extract. Peptides, oligopeptides, and polypeptides of the crude extract can be exposed to dendritic cells, followed by processing of the peptides by the dendritic cells. Derived from also encompasses providing dendritic cells with intact cancer cells, where the cancer cells are living, or where the cancer cells have been treated with irradiation but are still metabolically active, or where the cancer cells have been treated with a nucleic acid cross-linking agent but are still metabolically active. “Derived from” includes mixtures of cancer cell debris, free cancer cell proteins, and irradiated cancer cells, that are taken up by dendritic cells, and therefore are derived from the cancer cells.
“Administration” as it applies to a human, mammal, mammalian subject, animal, veterinary subject, placebo subject, research subject, experimental subject, cell, tissue, organ, or biological fluid, refers without limitation to contact of an exogenous ligand, reagent, placebo, small molecule, pharmaceutical agent, therapeutic agent, diagnostic agent, or composition to the subject, cell, tissue, organ, or biological fluid, and the like. “Administration” can refer, e.g., to therapeutic, pharmacokinetic, diagnostic, research, placebo, and experimental methods. Treatment of a cell encompasses contact of a reagent to the cell, as well as contact of a reagent to a fluid, where the fluid is in contact with the cell. “Administration” also encompasses in vitro and ex vivo treatments, e.g., of a cell, by a reagent, diagnostic, binding composition, or by another cell.
An “agonist,” as it relates to a ligand and receptor, comprises a molecule, combination of molecules, a complex, or a combination of reagents, that stimulates the receptor. For example, an agonist of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can encompass GM-CSF, a mutein or derivative of GM-CSF, a peptide mimetic of GM-CSF, a small molecule that mimics the biological function of GM-CSF, or an antibody that stimulates GM-CSF receptor. An antagonist, as it relates to a ligand and receptor, comprises a molecule, combination of molecules, or a complex, that inhibits, counteracts, downregulates, and/or desensitizes the receptor. “Antagonist” encompasses any reagent that inhibits a constitutive activity of the receptor. A constitutive activity is one that is manifest in the absence of a ligand/receptor interaction. “Antagonist” also encompasses any reagent that inhibits or prevents a stimulated (or regulated) activity of a receptor. By way of example, an antagonist of GM-CSF receptor includes, without implying any limitation, an antibody that binds to the ligand (GM-CSF) and prevents it from binding to the receptor, or an antibody that binds to the receptor and prevents the ligand from binding to the receptor, or where the antibody locks the receptor in an inactive conformation.
Unless expressly stated otherwise, or dictated otherwise by the context, the term “expression” encompasses the following. Expression encompasses the biosynthesis of mRNA, polypeptide biosynthesis, polypeptide activation, e.g., by post-translational modification, or an activation of expression by changing the subcellular location or by recruitment to chromatin. In other words, “increased expression” encompasses increased biosynthesis, or increased activity that is caused by phosphorylation, or an increased activity that is caused by migration from the cytosol to the nucleus.
Antigen presenting cells (APCs) are cells of the immune system used for presenting antigen to T cells. APCs include dendritic cells, monocytes, macrophages, marginal zone Kupffer cells, microglia, Langerhans cells, T cells, and B cells (see, e.g., Rodriguez-Pinto and Moreno (2005) Eur. J. Immunol. 35:1097-1105). Dendritic cells occur in at least two lineages. The first lineage encompasses pre-DC1, myeloid DC1, and mature DC1. The second lineage encompasses CD34++CD45RA-early progenitor multipotent cells, CD34++CD45RA+ cells, CD34++CD45RA++ CD4+ IL-3Ralpha++ pro-DC2 cells, CD4+CD11c−plasmacytoid pre-DC2 cells, lymphoid human DC2 plasmacytoid-derived DC2s, and mature DC2s (see, e.g., Gilliet and Liu (2002) J. Exp. Med. 195:695-704; Bauer, et al. (2001) J. Immunol. 166:5000-5007; Arpinati, et al. (2000) Blood 95:2484-2490; Kadowaki, et al. (2001) J. Exp. Med. 194:863-869; Liu (2002) Human Immunology 63:1067-1071; McKenna, et al. (2005) J. Virol. 79:17-27; O'Neill, et al. (2004) Blood 104:2235-2246; Rossi and Young (2005) J. Immunol. 175:1373-1381; Banchereau and Palucka (2005) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5:296-306).
“Effective amount” encompasses, without limitation, an amount that can ameliorate, reverse, mitigate, prevent, or diagnose a symptom or sign of a medical condition or disorder. Unless dictated otherwise, explicitly or by context, an “effective amount” is not limited to a minimal amount sufficient to ameliorate a condition. The severity of a disease or disorder, as well as the ability of a treatment to prevent, treat, or mitigate, the disease or disorder can be measured, without implying any limitation, by a biomarker or by a clinical parameter. Biomarkers include blood counts, metabolite levels in serum, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid, tumor cell counts, cancer stem cell counts, tumor levels. Tumor levels can be determined by the RECIST criteria (Eisenhauer, et al. (2009) Eur. J. Cancer. 45:228-247). Expression markers encompass genetic expression of mRNA or gene amplification, expression of an antigen, and expression of a polypeptide. Clinical parameters include progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, disease-free survival (DFS), time to progression (TTP), time to distant metastasis (TDM), and overall survival, without implying any limitation.
A composition that is “labeled” is detectable, either directly or indirectly, by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, isotopic, or chemical methods. For example, useful labels include 32P, 33P, 35S 14C, 3H, 125I, stable isotopes, epitope tags fluorescent dyes, electron-dense reagents, substrates, or enzymes, e.g., as used in enzyme-linked immunoassays, or fluorettes (see, e.g., Rozinov and Nolan (1998) Chem. Biol. 5:713-728).
The following generally concerns toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, agents that deplete T regulatory cells (Tregs), agents that can enhance activity of CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells, and other agents that modulate the immune system. The present disclosure provides reagents, methods of administration, methods of diagnosis, and methods for stimulating immune response against tumor antigens, that use one or more, as well as combinations thereof, of the following reagents.
The present disclosure provides immune adjuvants and other immune system modulating agents for use with dendritic cell vaccine. What is provided are toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, such as the following. Imidazoquinolines, such as imiquimod and resiquimod, are TLR7 or TLR8 agonists. Stimulation of TLR7 of plasmacytoid dendritic cells results in expression of IFN-alpha. Stimulation of TLR7 of myeloid dendritic cells results in expression of interleukin-12, and the consequent Th1-type immune response. CpG oligonucleotides (CpG ODNs) are TLR9 agonists. CpG ODNs occur in three classes, CpG-A, CpG-B, and CpG-C. CpG-A stimulates NK cells, owing to its IFN-alpha producing effect on plasmacytoid DCs. CpG-B induces IFN-alpha, and upregulates co-stimulatory markers on pDCs and B cells. TLR3 agonists include polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid (poly I:C), which is an analogue of viral double stranded RNA (dsRNA). TLR4 agonists include monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), which is a derivative of Salmonella minnesota lipopolysaccharide, and which is used as part of a vaccine against human papillomavirus. Attenuated bacteria are used in anti-cancer therapy. Mycobacterium bovis stimulates TLR2, and TLR4, and TLR9. Listeria monocytogenes stimulates various TLRs (US 2007/0207171 of Dubensky et al, which is incorporated herein by reference, in its entirety). See also, Galluzzi et al (2012) Oncolmmunology. 1:699-716; Adams (2009) Immunotherapy. 1:949-964.
Alpha-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer) is also provided (Schwaab and Ernstoff (2011) Therapy. 4:369-377). Alpha-GalCer provokes the activation of NKT cells that express certain T cell receptors (Lopez-Sagaseta et al (2012) PLoS Biol. 10:e1001412 (11 pages)). What is also provided are agonists of NOD receptors. NOD receptors include NOD1 and NOD2. NOD agonists include N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine (muramyldipeptide (MDP)), which binds to NOD 2. NOD agonists include gamma-D-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic acid (iE-DAP), which binds to NOD1. NOD agonists include desmuramylpeptides (DMP), which binds to NOD1. See, e.g., Uehara et al (2006) J. Immunol. 177:1796-1804). NOD agonists are derived from fragments of peptidoglycan.
Also provided are agents that inhibit T regulatory cells (Tregs). These agents include cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, and antibodies that deplete Tregs (see, e.g., Le and Jaffee (2012) Cancer Res. 72:3439-3444; Klages et al (2010) Cancer Res. 70:7788-7799). Gemcitabine reduces the immunosuppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) (Le et al (2009) Int. Immunopharmacol. 9:900-909). Anti-CD25 antibodies can deplete Tregs, and have been used in the treatment of cancer (Klages et al (2010) Cancer Res. 70:7788-7799). Daclizumab is an anti-CD25 antibody, which blocks binding of interleukin-2 (IL-2) to CD25, thereby blocking a signal needed for Treg maintenance. Some Tregs express high levels of CTLA4 (CD45RA+ Tregs). Anti-CTLA4 antibodies, such as ipilimumab, target CTLA4. Ipilimumab is used for treating melanoma (Rech et al (2012) Immunotherapy. 4:1103-1105).
Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) blocking agents, such as anti-LAG-3 antibodies or soluble LAG-3 (e.g., LAG-3 lg), can enhance immune response to cancers or infections. Anti-LAG-3 antibodies reduce the activity of Tregs (see, e.g., Huang, et al. (2004) Immunity 21:503-513; Triebel (2003) Trends Immunol. 24:619-622).
Antibodies are available that directly target CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells. These antibodies include those that target costimulatory receptors (4-1 BB, OX40 and GITR) or the blockade of co-inhibitory receptors (CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1). GITR is glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein. See, e.g., Schaer et al (2010) Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs. 11:1378-1386). Anti-GITR can stop the suppressive function of Tregs, thus explaining anti-GITR's efficacy in anti-cancer therapy (Coe et al (2010) Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 59:1367-1377). DTA-1 is an anti-GITR antibody.
The present disclosure also provides ELISPOT assays, intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), and tetramer assays, for characterizing immune response (see, e.g., of US 2007/0190029 of Pardoll; Chattopadhyay (2008) Cytometry A. 2008 73:1001-1009; Vollers (2008) Immunology. 123:305-313; Lalvani, et al. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186:859-865; Waldrop (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99:1739-1750; Hudgens (2004) J. Immunol. Methods 288:19-34; Goulder (2001) J. Virol. 75:1339-1347; Goulder (2000) J. Exp. Med. 192:1819-1831; Anthony (2003) Methods 29:260-269; Badovinac and Harty (2000) J. Immunol. Methods 238:107-117). Immune response in a patient can be assessed by endpoints that are used in oncology clinical trials, including objective response (RECIST criteria), overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival, time to distant metastasis, 6-month PFS, 12-month PFS, and so on.
Glioblastoma-specific antigens include PTPRZ1; EGFR; SEC61G; TNC; HER2; TRP-2; gp100; MAGE-1; IL13Ralpha2; AIM-2 (Phuphanich et at (2013) Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 62:125-135; Neidert et al (2012) J. Neurooncol.). Colorectal cancer-specific antigens include SPARC, CEA, Cep55/c10orf3 (Inoue et al (2010) Int. J. Cancer. 127:1393-1403, Parkhurst et at (2011) Mol. Ther. 19:620-626; Inoda et al (2011) Exp. Mol. Pathol. 90:55-60). Renal cancer-specific antigens include carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX), MUC-1, and NYESO-1, and 5T4 (Tykodi et at (2012) J. Immunother. 35:523-533). Ovarian cancer-specific antigens include WT1, mesothelin, NY-ESO-1, p53, p53 carrying specific mutations, HER-2/neu, folate receptor-alpha, IGFBP; MUC1, MUC4, MUC16, EpCAM; CTA (Dohi et al (2011) Anticancer Res. 31:2441-2445; Vermeij et at (2012) Curr. Pharm. Des. 18:3804-3811; Preston et al (2011) Immunother. 3:539-556). Specificity can arise from the amino acid sequence of the antigen, from the degree of expression of that antigen by the tumor cell, from post-translational modification of the antigen, and the like. Specificity to a certain type of cancer cell can also arise from a particular fingerprint of a plurality of tumor antigens. Specificity can also arise, from the fact that a particular antigen, while expressed by a wide variety of tumor cells, has particular use in immunotherapy against a smaller number of tumor types. Specificity can also arise from the fact that a particular collection of MHC class I presentable and MHC class II presentable epitopes exist, on a particular polypeptide or polypeptide fragment. Also, specificity in an administered antigen can arise by omitting one or more peptides that can provoke immunotolerance. The skilled artisan can easily locate the relevant nucleic acid and polypeptide sequences, e.g., on the U.S. government's web site, at ncbi.nlm.nih.
A vaccine of the present disclosure can be purely preventative, it can be used for treating an existing cancer or pre-neoplastic disorder, or it can be used for preventing recurrence of a previously treated cancer. Dendritic cell vaccine of the present disclosure can be administered by intradermal, intranodal, mucosal, or subcutaneous routes, or any combination of the above. Each dose can comprise about 10×103 dendritic cells, 20×103 cells, 50×103 cells, 100×103 cells, 200×103 cells, 500×103 cells, 1×106 cells, 2×106 cells, 20×106 cells, 50×106 cells, 100×106 cells, 200×106, 500×106, 1×109 cells, 2×109 cells, 5×109 cells, 10×109 cells, and the like. Administration frequency can be, e.g., once per week, twice per week, once every two weeks, once every three weeks, once every four weeks, once per month, once every two months, once every three months, once every four months, once every five months, once every six months, and so on. The total number of days where administration occurs can be one day, on 2 days, or on 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 days, and so on. It is understood that any given administration might involve two or more injections on the same day. In one aspect, the disclosure involves loading dendritic cells with whole tumor cells, where at least 10%, where at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99%, of the melanoma cell-derived protein that is loaded into the dendritic cells resides in whole tumor cells. In non-limiting embodiments, dendritic cell vaccine is held in a flask, in a vial, in a bottle, in a syringe, in a catheter, in a cannula, and so on. For administration, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 99%, of the dendritic cells that are administered are mature dendritic cells.
In embodiments, the disclosure provides a vaccine comprising dendritic cells that contain melanoma peptides derived from in vitro loading, where the vaccine comprises dendritic cells (sum of DCs containing melanoma peptide, and DCs not containing melanoma peptides) at a ratio of dendritic cells/melanoma cells of at least 5/95, 10/90, 20/80, 30/70, 40/60, 50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, 90/10, 95/5, 98/2, 99/1, and the like. Also provided, is a vaccine comprising dendritic cells that contain melanoma peptides derived from in vitro loading, where the vaccine comprises dendritic cells (sum of DCs containing melanoma peptide, and DCs not containing melanoma peptides) at a ratio of [dendritic cells]/[cells that are neither DCs nor melanoma], of at least 5/95, 10/90, 20/80, 30/70, 40/60, 50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, 90/10, 95/5, 98/2, 99/1, and the like. The disclosure provides a compartmented container, where a first compartment contains melanoma cells, and a second compartment contains dendritic cells. The two compartments can be separated by a membrane, filter, valve, conduit, coupler, which prevents the melanoma cells from contacting the dendritic cells, but where manual transfer, or where removal of the membrane or opening of the valve allows the melanoma cells to contact the dendritic cells, allowing loading of melanoma cells, melanoma cell fragments, and/or melanoma peptides, on the dendritic cells.
The present disclosure encompasses mimetics, for example, interferon-gamma mimetics, such as mimetic peptide 95-132 (Ahmed (2007) J. Immunol. 178:4576-4583; Fulcher (2008) FEBS Lett. 582:1569-1574). IFN-mimetic encompasses, e.g., an antibody that has the same agonist activity of interferon-gamma.
The present disclosure provides compositions and methods, where cancer cells are inactivated, for example, by radiation or by way of nucleic acid cross-linkers. Exemplary cross-linkers, have the ability to cross-link DNA but to leave proteins unmodified. A nucleic acid alkylator can be beta-alanine, N-(acridin-9-yl), 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]ethyl ester. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid targeted compound is a psoralen compound activated by UVA irradiation. For instance, the nucleic acid targeting compound can be 4′-(4-amino-2-oxa)butyl-4,5′,8-trimethylpsoralen (also referred to herein as “S-59”). Cells can be inactivated with 150 micromolar of psoralen S-59 and 3 J/cm2 UVA light (FX 1019 irradiation device, Baxter Fenwal, Round Lake, Ill.). The inactivation with S-59 is referred to as photochemical treatment and results in complete inactivation of the cells. Various concentrations of nucleic acid cross-linked agent can be tested for efficacy in inactivating cells, for example, for efficacy in preventing cell division. S-59 is distinguished by its ability to cross-link nucleic acids, but to leave proteins intact an unmodified. Cells can be suspended in 5 mL of saline containing 0, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 nM of psoralen S-59. Each sample can be irradiated as follows. The S-59 can be added at a concentration of 100 nM. Samples can be UVA irradiated at a dose of approximately 2 J/cm2 (FX1019 irradiation device, Baxter Fenwal, Round Lake, Ill.). Each sample can then transferred to a 15 mL tube, centrifuged, and the supernatant removed, and then washed with 5 mL saline, centrifuged and the supernatant removed and the final pellet suspended in 0.5 mL of saline (U.S. Pat. No. 7,833,775 of Dubensky and U.S. Pat. No. 7,691,393 of Dubensky).
Enriching for Cancer Cells that are Non-Apoptotic
A population of melanoma cells can be enriched in melanoma cells that are non-apoptotic, for example, by use of the technique that separates non-apoptotic and autophagic cells from cells that are non-autophagic and apoptotic, where separation is by the adhesion of the autophagic and non-apoptotic cells to a surface, where the other cells are floating. A population enriched in non-apoptotic melanoma cells can also be acquired by removing apoptotic cells by way of an antibody specific for phosphatidyl serine. Techniques for removing cells by way of immobilized antibodies are available (Onodera (1998) Ther. Apher. 2:37-42). Antibodies specific for phosphatidylserine are available (e.g., EMD Millipore, Billerca, Mass.). Also, bulk population of melanoma cells can be labeled with fluorescent anti-phosphatidylserine antibodies, where the tagged apoptotic melanoma cells are removed by flow cytometry, affinity chromatography, immunomagnetic separation (see, e.g., Hoeppener (2012) Recent Results Cancer Res. 195:43-58; Dainiak (2007) Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 106:1-18). This technique is generally applicable to enriching in cancer cells that are melanoma cells, and also for cancer cells that are not melanoma cells.
Z-VAD (Z-VAD-fmk), an inhibitor of apoptosis, can be acquired from, e.g., Enzo Life Sciences (Exeter, UK), R & D Systems (Minneapolis, Minn.), Tocris Biosciences (Bristol, UK), BioMol (Plymouth Meeting, Pa.), and EMD Chemicals (Gibbstown, N.J.). Z-VAD-fmk is a synthetic peptide, Z-Val-Ala-Asp(OMe)-CH2F. Caspases are cysteine-aspartic acid-specific members of the protease family. Caspases are activated by a death receptor ligation, e.g., TRAIL, FAS, by DNA damage, stress, serum starvation and in some cell types, interferons. Caspases play a critical role in the highly regulated process of apoptosis that includes nuclear fragmentation, chromatin condensation, and loss of cytoplasmic integrity. The pan-capase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk (carbobenzoxy-valyl-alanyl-aspartyl-[O-methyl]-fluoromethylketone) irreversibly binds the catalytic site of caspase proteases and inhibits their function in inducing apoptosis. Inhibiting the ability of cells to undergo apoptosis in response to IFN-gamma can be a means by which cells that are non-apoptotic but autophagic and be generated without the steps of selection by the washing to remove floating apoptotic cells.
The disclosure provides pharmaceuticals, reagents, kits including diagnostic kits, that wherein the pharmaceuticals, reagents, and kits, comprise dendritic cells, antibodies, or antigens. What is also provided are methods for administering compositions that comprise at least one dendritic cell and at least one antigen, methods for stimulating antibody formation, methods for stimulating ADCC, methods for stimulating complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and methods and kits for determining patient suitability, for determining patient inclusion/exclusion criteria in the context of a clinical trial or ordinary medical treatment, and for predicting response to the pharmaceutical or reagent. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity is described (see, e.g., Goodman, et al. (1990) J. Clin. Oncol. 8:1083-1092; Cheson (2010) J. Clin. Oncol. 28:3525-3530). The pharmaceutical compositions, reagents, and related methods, of the disclosure encompass CD83 positive dendritic cells, where CD83 is induced by loading with IFN-gamma-treated cancer cells. In a CD83 aspect of the disclosure, the CD83 is induced by at least 2%, at least 3%, at least 4%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, and the like.
In one aspect, the disclosure excludes non-autologous tumor cells for loading dendritic cells, and excludes methods of using non-autologous tumor cells for loading dendritic cells.
Dendritic cells were generated by plastic adherence method of ficoled apheresis products (Choi, et al. (1998) Clin. Cancer Res. 4:2709-2716; Luft, et al. (1998) Exp. Hematol. 26:489-500; Cornforth, et al. (2011) Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 60:123-131), in antibiotic-free AIM-V medium (Invitrogen, Grand Island, N.Y.) supplemented with 1,000 IU/mL each of IL-4 (CellGenix, Freisberg, Germany) and GM-CSF (Berlex, Seattle, Wash.) (DC medium). The flasks were then cultivated for 6 days prior to loading with IFN-gamma treated, irradiated autologous tumor cells.
Pure tumor cells were generated according to Cornforth, et al. (Cornforth, et al. (2011) Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 60:123-131; Dillman, et al. (1993) J. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 14:65-69; Dillman, et al. (2000) Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 15:161-168). The tumor cells were then incubated with 1,000 U/mL of interferon-gamma (InterMune, Brisbane, Calif.) for 72 h, irradiated with 100 Gy from a cesium source and cryopreserved (Selvan, et al. (2007) Int. J. Cancer 122:1374-1383; Selvan, et al. (2010) Melanoma Res. 20:280-292). The IFN-gamma treated and irradiated tumor cells were recovered from cryopreservation, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and then added to the cultivated dendritic cells (DCs) and then incubated for about 24 h. The antigen-loaded DCs were harvested by gentle scraping with a rubber policeman and cryopreserved. Aliquots of IFN-gamma treated or untreated tumor cells and loaded DCs were obtained for flow cytometry evaluation and trypan-blue exclusion assay.
The pharmaceutical or reagent of the disclosure can be administered to melanoma patients, where melanoma is diagnosed at Stage I, Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV (Mohr, et at (2009) Ann. Oncology (Suppl. 6) vi14-vi21). Stage I, for example, refers to patients with primary melanomas without evidence of regional or distant metastasis. Stage II includes patients without evidence of lymphatic disease or distant metastases, where the patients are further characterized, e.g., by lesions greater than 1 mm and less than or equal to 2 mm thick with ulceration of the overlying epithelium, or by lesions greater than 2 mm and less than or equal to 4 mm thick with epithelial ulceration. Stage III melanoma includes lesions with pathologically documented involvement of regional lymph nodes or in-transit or satellite metastases, where patients may have, e.g., one, two, three, or four or more affected lymph nodes. Stage IV melanoma is defined by the presence of distant metastases, where the metastasis is located only in distant skin, subcutaneous tissues, or lymph nodes, where the metastasis involves lung metastases, or where the metastasis involves all other visceral sites.
The disclosure encompasses methods for administration that are preventative, that is, for use with subjects not yet or never diagnosed with a melanoma. What is encompassed are methods for administration where a subject had earlier been diagnosed with a melanoma, and had earlier been successfully treated to eradicate the melanma (or had experienced a spontaneous complete remission), and where following eradication the administration is used preventatively.
Without implying any limitation, melanoma cells of the disclosure express one or more of Mage, Mart-1, Mel-5, HMB45, S100, or tyrosinase (Dillman, et al. (2011) Cancer Biotherapy Radiopharmaceuticals 26:407-415). In one aspect, detection of tumor antigen uses cells that were not exposed to IFN-gamma while, in another aspect, detection of tumor antigen is conducted on cells that were treated with IFN-gamma (see, e.g., Cornforth, et al. (2011) Cancer Biotherapy Radiopharmaceuticals 26:345-351). What is encompassed are melanoma cells expressing one or more melanoma antigens, or compositions comprising one or more isolated melanoma antigens, as disclosed by US2007/0207171 of Dubensky, et al, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Apoptosis can be detected or measured with a number of reagents, e.g., fluorochrome-labeled annexin, by staining with dyes such as propidium iodide and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD), by determining loss of mitochondrial inner memebrane potential, by measuring activation or cleavage of caspases. See, e.g., George, et al. (2004) Cytometry Part A. 59A:237-245. An early event in apoptosis is exposure of phosphatidyl serine on the outer surface of the plasma membrane, which can be detected by fluorochrome-labeled annexin. The available methods can distinguish between live cells, necrotic cells, early apoptotic cells, and late apoptotic cells. The disclosure uses melanoma cells that are not apoptotic by 7-ADD assay, not apoptotic by annexin V assay, not apoptotic by an assay for apoptosis after IFN-gamma treatment (Dillman, et al. (2011) Cancer Biotherapy Radiopharmaceuticals 26:407-415), or not apoptotic by one or more of the biomarkers Bcl-2, caspase-3, P53, or survivin (Karam, et al. (2007) Lancet Oncol. 8:128-136). The pharmaceutical compositions, reagents, and related methods, of the disclosure exclude IFN-gamma-treated melanoma cells that are apoptotic, where apoptosis is determined, e.g., according to U.S. Pat. No. 7,544,465 issued to Herlyn, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,109 issued to Thorpe, et al, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Autophagy is a naturally occurring process that is used for the degradation of many proteins and some organelles. Autophagy mediates protein and organelle turnover, starvation response, cell differentiation, cell death, and so on. Microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) is to monitor autophagy. In one approach, autophagy can be detected by measuring the conversion of LC3, which involves conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II. The amount of LC3-II is correlated with the number of autophagosomes. In detail, LC3 is cytosolic and soluble, while LC3-II is present on membranes. LC3-II has a greater molecular weight because it is conjugated with a lipid. LC3 processing can be measured, e.g., by western blots, while autophagy, autophagic vesicles, and autophagosomes, can be measured by microscopy. Autophagy can be quantitated, e.g., by detecting processed LC3-II, by the ratio between early to late autophagic compartments, or by autophagic volume. See, (Mizushima and Yoshimori (2007) Autophagy 3:542-546:634-641; Tanida, et al. (2008) Methods Mol. Biol. 445:77-88; Eng, et al. (2010) Autophagy 6:634-641). In one aspect, the present disclosure uses autophagy as a screening tool, for selecting appropriate autophagic cancer cells, where the cells can be selected according to occurrence of autophagy in one or more particular stages. These autophagy stages include: (1) sequestering of cytosolic compartments by the autophagosome, (2) fusion of the autophagosome with the lysosome to form the autolysosome, and (3) degradation of the autophagosomal contents by proteases within the lysosome. In another aspect, the present disclosure includes mainly cells displaying the first stage, mainly the second stage, mainly the third stage, mainly the first and second stage, mainly the second and third stage, or mainly cells displaying all three stages. In yet another aspect, the disclosure comprises cells displaying the first stage, the second stage, the third stage, the first and second, the second and third stage, or cells displaying all three stages.
IFN-gamma (type II interferon) signaling depends on expression of a number of genes, e.g., IFN-gamma receptor, STAT1, STAT2, STAT1 homodimers, STAT1/STAT2 heterodimers, IRF-1, GAS, and IRF-E. Studies have shown that IFN-gamma signaling is dependent on IFN-gamma receptor (IFNGR1 chain; IFNGR2 chain). Low expression of IFNGR on the cell surface can block some aspects of IFN-gamma signaling (Schroder, et al. (2004) J. Leukocyte boil. 75:163-189). In one aspect, the present disclosure excludes using cancer cells that show low surface expression of IFNGR. In another aspect, the present disclosure screens cancer cells for those that express the STAT1 homodimer, uses these cells, and substantially excludes cells that do not express STAT1 homodimer. In yet another aspect, the disclosure contemplates screening cells for those with STAT1 phosphorylation (serine-727). What is also contemplated, is excluding cancer cells from patients having loss of function mutations in the STAT1 gene (see, e.g., Dupuis, et al. (2001) Science 293:300-303; Schroder, et al. (2004) J. Leukoc. Biol. 75:163-189). The following concerns the IRF gene family. IRF-1, IRF-2, and IRF-9, all participate in IFN-gamma signaling. The disclosure embraces using cancer cells that express one or more of these IRF gene family genes, or excluding cancer cells that do not express one or more of these genes.
The present disclosure embraces biologic material, compositions, reagents, and methods that require using a melanoma cell, or pre-neoplastic melanoma cell, that responds to IFN-gamma. The melanoma cell can be identified, distinguished, and selected, by an assay for the expression of one or more IFN-gamma-responsive genes. A number of IFN-gamma-responsive genes have been identified (see, e.g., Halonen, et al. (2006) J. Neuroimmunol. 175:19-30; MacMicking (2004) 11:601-609; Boehm, et al. (1997) 15:749-795). Said assay can involve removing one or more melanoma cells from the patient, culturing the cell in the presence and absence of added IFN-gamma, and determining responsiveness to IFN-gamma. In the assay, IFN-gamma induced gene expression can be detected by assays sensitive to binding of a transcription factor to the promoter of an IFN-gamma induced gene, to expression of mRNA from an IFN-gamma induced gene, to expressed polypeptide, and the like. The IFN-gamma response gene can include, e.g., a gene used for immune response, encoding a transcription factor, a transport protein, an apoptosis gene, a gene used for cell growth or maintenance, a gene used for lipid metabolism, a gene that mediates endocytosis or exocytosis, an intracellular signaling gene, a glucose metabolism gene, a cell adhesion gene, as well as genes without an established function.
In one aspect, the disclosure excludes melanoma cells that, with IFN-gamma treatment, show reduced expression of MHC class II, show no detectable change in expression of MHC class II, show an increase of MHC class II expression of 10% or less, show an increase in MHC class II expression of 15% or less, show an increase in MHC class II expression of 20% or less, 25% or less, 30% or less, 40% or less, 50% or less, and the like. In one aspect, the value for percentage refers to the average expression value for the population of melanoma cells, residing in a biopsy or part of a biopsy, from a given subject or patient.
ab000677, JAB/SOCS1; m63961, IFN-gamma inducible protein (mag-1); m35590, Macrophage inflammatory protein 1-β; m19681, MCP-1 (JE); y07711, zyxin; M34815, Monokine induced by IFN-gamma (MIG); m33266, Interferon inducible protein 10 (IP-10); U44731, Purine nucleotide binding protein; U88328, Sup. of cytokine signalling-3 (SOCS-3); M21065, Interferon regulatory factor 1; M63630, GTP binding protein (IRG-47); U19119, G-protein-like LRG-47; L27990, Ro protein; M31419, 204 interferon-activatable protein; af022371, Interferon-inducible protein 203; U28404, MIP-1 alpha receptor; U43085, Glucocorticoid-attenuated response 39; x56123, Talin; m31419, 204 interferon-activatable protein; U53219, GTPase IGTP; I38444, T-cell specific protein; M31418, 202 interferon-activatable protein; d38417, Arylhydrocarbon receptor; m26071, Tissue factor (mtf); D13759, Cot proto-oncogene; M18194, Fibronectin; u59463, ICH-3; M13945, pim-1 proto-oncogene; L20450, DNA-binding protein (see, Gil, et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 98:6680-6685). The disclosure encompasses use of the IFN-gamma induced gene, CIITA (see, e.g., Chan, et al. (2010) J. Leukocyte Biol. 88:303-311; Kwon, et al (2007) Mol. Immunol. 44:2841-2849).
The present disclosure embraces measuring expression of one or more of the following IFN-gamma inducible genes, as a screening procedure for qualifying or selecting patients for administering a pharmaceutical. The genes include, (gene 1) FCGR1A, (gene 2) IL6R, (gene 3) CXCL9, (gene 4) CLCSF14, (gene 5) UBD, (gene 6) C/EBPalpha, and (gene 7) MHC2TA (CIITA) (see, Waddell, et al. (2010) PLoS ONE 5:e9753). Also embraced are use of specific clusters of these genes, in the qualifying procedure, such as, genes 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 4, 4 and 5, 5 and 6, 6 and 7, 1 and 3, 1 and 4, 1 and 5, 1 and 6, 1 and 7, 2 and 4, 2 and 5, 2 and 6, 2 and 7, 3 and 5, 3 and 6, 3 and 7, 4 and 6, 4 and 7, 5, and 7, and well as combinations of three genes, e.g., 1, 2, 3; or 3, 4, 5; or 4, 5, 6; or 5, 6, 7; or 1, 3, 4; or 1, 3, 5, or 1, 3, 6, or 1, 3, 7; or 1, 2, 4; or 1, 2, 5; or 1, 2, 6; or 1, 2, 7; and the like. (These gene numbers are arbitrary.)
What is excluded is a population of melanoma cells that is less than 90% are autophagic, less than 80% are autophagic, less than 70% are autophagic, less than 60% are autophagic, less than 50% are autophagic, less than 40% are autophagic, and the like.
What is excluded is a population of melanoma cells where, that is less than 90% are non-apoptotic, less than 80% are non-apoptotic, less than 70% are non-apoptotic, less than 60% are non-apoptotic, less than 50% are non-apoptotic, less than 40% are non-apoptotic, and the like.
What is excluded is a population of melanoma cells that is less than 90% are non-adherent, less than 80% are non-adherent, less than 70% are non-adherent, less than 60% are non-adherent, less than 50% are non-adherent, less than 40% are non-adherent, and the like.
Expression of MHC class II can be measured, for example, using antibodies or nucleic acid probes that are specific for MHC class II gene products. These MHC class II gene products include HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, as well as HLA-DM and HLA-DO (see, e.g., Apostolopoulos, et al. (2008) Human Vaccines 4:400-409).
For example, the present disclosure encompasses reagents, methods of treatment, and methods of diagnosis, that require the melanoma cells to express STAT1 and STAT2, to have an active STAT1-signaling pathway, to have an active STAT2-signaling pathway, or to have active STAT1 and STAT2-signaling pathways.
The disclosure provides a pharmaceutical composition or pharmaceutical reagent, related methods of administration, and methods of treatment, that result in survival data with a hazard ratio (HR) of less than 1.0, HR less than 0.9, HR less than 0.8, HR less than 0.7, HR less than 0.6, HR less than 0.5, HR less than 0.4, HR less than 0.3, and the like. The disclosure results in overall survival data, progression-free survival data, time to progression data, and so on. What is also provided is 6-month PFS of at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, and so on. Moreover, what is provided is 6-month overall survival of at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, and so on. Additionally, what is provided is 1-year (or 2-year) PFS of at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, and so on. Moreover, what is provided is 1-year (or 2-year) overall survival of at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, and so on (see, e.g., U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Clinical trial endpoints for the approval of cancer drugs and biologics (April 2005)).
Induction of autophagy after IFN-gamma treatment, as measured by increases in the expression of major histocompatibility class II complexes, can be used to determine response to systemic IFN-gamma treatment. If biopsied melanoma tumor cells, upon exposure to IFN-gamma in culture, undergo autophagy but not apoptosis, this indicates that these patients will respond favorably to systemic IFN-gamma treatment. Additionally, if successful cell lines are established from the biopsies, that patient would also benefit from cell-therapy products prepared from IFN-gamma treated purified tumor cells lines that are from autophagic but non-apoptotic adherent populations.
The disclosure embraces isolating and characterizing major histocompatiability complexes isolated from autophagic, non-apoptotic cells collected from tumor cell lines treated with interferon-gamma. Major histocompatibility complexes contain antigens specific for CD4+ T cells and have been associated with antibody mediated immune responses. The complexes would represent a large repertoire of antigens would not be present in non-autophagic cells due to the action of lysosomal mediated antigen processing induced in autophagic cells.
Non-apoptotic, autophagic tumor cells generated from IFN-gamma treated cell lines can be fused with dendritic cells to enhance the antigen presentation due to the high levels of major histocompatability complexes on the surface of the autophagic tumor cells. This process would yield a novel cellular product generated from the fusion of the two cell types.
The process of induction of autophagy in response to IFN-gamma may be induced in a manner that does not result in apoptosis. By combining the treatment of tumor cells with caspase inhibitors and interferon gamma, the process of cell death (and ultimately the formation of tolergeneic apoptotic cells) can be blocked without inhibiting the induction of autophagy or the increase in major histocompatibility class II complexes.
Procedure to Eliminate Apoptotic Cells, while Retaining Viable Autophagic Cells
Studies of melanoma demonstrated a correlation between the presence of apoptotic cells and poor survival in a clinical trial (Cornforth, et al. (2011) Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 60:123-131; Dillman, et al. (2011) Cancer Biother. Radiopharmaceuticals 26:407-415). The following study investigated the induction of autophagy, apoptosis and MHC class II molecules after IFN-gamma treatment of melanoma tumor cells in vitro.
The methodology of the study was as follows. Autologous and model melanoma tumor cell lines were incubated with 1000 IU/mL of IFN-gamma for 72 hours prior to assaying for autophagy, apoptosis and MHC class II expression. Autophagy was detected by immunobloting with antibodies against LC3 II and by flow cytometry with Enzo's CytoID® Autophagy Detection Kit. Apoptosis and MHC class II induction were assayed by flow cytometry using 7-AAD and annexin-V staining and antibodies against MHC class II, respectively. 7-AAD intercalates in dsDNA. 7-AAD is excluded by viable cells, and thus it can be used to detect dead cells.
The results from the study demonstrated that IFN-gamma induces both autophagic and apoptotic cell populations in melanoma cell lines. The apoptotic population was predominantly found in the non-adherent population while the autophagic cells remained adherent to the flask. Blocking of autophagy with the inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) inhibits the induction of MHC class II positive cells in response to IFN-gamma (39.4% IFN-gamma vs. 10.0% IFN-gamma+3-MA). Inhibition of caspase activity with the pan caspase inhibitor Z-VAD prevents apoptosis but does not perturb autophagy in IFN-gamma treated cells (2.75±0.15 IFN-gamma vs. 3.04±0.27 IFN-gamma+Z-VAD, fold change). To conclude, induction of apoptosis is associated with reduced levels of autophagy and MHC class II induction. This disclosure provides method or procedure to eliminate apoptotic cells while retaining viable autophagic cells after IFN-gamma treatment can enhance the effectiveness of this type of cell-based immunotherapy.
IFN-gamma has been associated with suppression of immune response against tumors (see, e.g., Hallermalm (2008) J. Immunol. 180:3766-3774; Romieu-Mourez (2010) Cancer Res. 70:7742-7747; Lee (2005) Clinical Cancer Res. 11:107-112).
A tumor can be a heterogeneous population of more or less differentiated cells. IFN-gamma treatment of melanoma cells of a tumor can act on some of the more differentiated cells that are more susceptible to apoptosis. By eliminating these cells from the antigen source, the result can be loss of some effect on the tumor bulk following vaccination, translated by slow or no apparent regression of tumor size. Studies have shown that apoptotic cells do not activate dendritic cells (Sauter (2000) J. Exp. Med. 191:423-434).
IFN-gamma may act to skew monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages. The amount of IFN-gamma in the preparation may influence the incomplete differentiation of DCs by skewing the phenotype to the less specialized macrophages.
IFN-gamma may be used to enhance the MHC Class II molecules, and have a direct presentation to the T cells. However, the co-induction of Ii protein (Calprotectin) with MHC Class II molecules prevents the presentation of endogenous tumor antigens from MHC Class II molecules.
Materials and Methods from First Study
Dendritic cells were generated by plastic adherence method as previously described (Choi (1998) Clin. Cancer Res. 4:2709-2716; Luft (1998) Exp. Hematol. 26:489-500). Briefly, autologous apheresis product was subjected to ficoll-hypaque (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) density gradient separation. The resulting peripheral blood mononuclear cells were placed in antibiotic-free AIM-V medium (Invitrogen, Grand Island, N.Y.) supplemented with 1,000 IU/mL each of IL-4 (CellGenix, Freisberg, Germany) and GM-CSF (Berlex, Seattle, Wash.) (DC medium) at 15×106 cells/mL in cell cultivation flasks (Corning-Costar, Corning, N.Y.). After one hour incubation, the non-adherent population was discarded and fresh DC medium was added to the flasks. The following morning, the non-adherent cells were discarded, the flasks were washed once with ambient temperature PBS, and fresh DC medium was added. The flasks were then cultivated for 6 days at which time flow cytometry evaluation is performed to determine the percentage and phenotype of DC generated by this approach (pre-load DC).
Pure tumor cells generated and characterized as previously reported were expanded to 200 million cells and then incubated with 1000 IU/mL of IFN-gamma (InterMune, Brisbane, Calif.) for 72 hours in 15% FBS/ECS in RPMI (complete medium), irradiated with 100 Gy from a cesium source and cryopreserved as previously described (Choi (1998) Clin. Cancer Res. 4:2709-2716; Luft (1998) Exp. Hematol. 26:489-500; Dillman (1993) J. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 14:65-69). The IFN-gamma treated and irradiated tumor cells were recovered from cryopreservation, washed 3× with PBS, and then added to the in vitro cultivated DC and incubated for ˜24 hours. The antigen loaded DC were harvested by gentle scraping with a rubber policeman and cryopreserved at equal amounts in 9-11 aliquots. An aliquot of cells was obtained for flow cytometry evaluation which represents the post-loaded DC cells.
Phenotypic characterization of the dendritic cell populations were performed using monoclonal antibodies against surface markers obtained from BD Pharmingen San Diego, Calif.: anti-MHC class II conjugated to PerCp, anti CD11c conjugated to APC, anti-CD80, anti-CD83, anti-CD86 conjugated to PE. Isotype controls were used to determine percent positive cells. Flow cytometry of tumor cells was conducted using antibodies against MHC class I and II conjugated to FITC, annexin-V-PE and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) from BD Pharmingen. CaliBRITE flow cytometry calibration (BD Pharmingen) was used prior to each run and the same instrument settings were used throughout the collection of flow cytometric data.
Cytoplasmic cell lysates were prepared with Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, Ill.) plus protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, Ind.) at 10,000 cells/uL on ice. Approximately 25 uLs/lane of cell lysates were separated on 12.5% tris-glycine gels, transferred to PVDF membrane and probed with antibodies against the following: calreticulin (MBL, Woburn, Mass.), Hsp-60, Hsp-70, Hsp-90 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.), HMBG-1 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Mass.), ICAM-1 (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, Calif.), Mel-4, Mart-1 (Signet, Emeryville, Calif.), tyrosinase (Upstate, Lake Placid, N.Y.) and GADPH (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany).
Expression of a panel antigens by melanoma lines were determined using immunocytochemical procedure. Cells were cultured in 8-chamber culture slides (Thermo Fisher, Rochester, N.Y.) in the presence or absence of 1000 IU/mL IFN-gamma. After 72 hours, the cells were washed 3 times with 1× Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and fixed in cold acetone. After blocking endogenous peroxidase, cells were incubated with appropriate primary antibodies against the antigens listed. Immunohistochemistry was performed using biotinylated anitmouse or rabbit immunoglobulins, Super Sensitive enzyme-conjugated streptavidin labeling and horse radish peroxidase chromogen, and substrate kits (Biogenex, San Ramon, Calif.). The reactivity of the following anti-human polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies was investigated with isotype matched control antibody: S-100 and HMB-45 (Biogenex, San Ramon, Calif.), Mel-2, Mel-5, Mart-1 (Signet, Dedham, Mass.), Tyrosinase and Mage-1 (Thermo Scientific, Fremont, Calif.), Melan-A, HLA-class I and HLA-class II (Dako, Denmark).
Student t-test of two-tailed, two samples of equal variance. Significant differences were determined by p value 0.05.
Results from the First Study
Cell death was differentially induced in the autologous melanoma tumor cells line in response to incubation with IFN-gamma for 72 hours in complete medium. Trypan-blue dye exclusion assay performed on cells either treated with IFN-gamma or not, revealed a significant trend toward lower viability in the IFN-gamma treated cells (89.1±6.8% vs. 84.9±9.3%, p=0.014, N=47). Analysis of a sample of four autologous melanoma cell lines by flow cytometry for apoptosis induction (
Lysates from cells that were incubated in the presence or absence of IFN-gamma were subjected to immunoblotting for a variety of molecules that may be important mediators of immunity (
The use of IFN-gamma results in the up-regulation of the major histocompatibility complexes, class I and class II (Bohn (1998) J. Immunol. 161:897-908). As shown in
A set of four representative autologous melanoma cell lines were incubated with IFN-gamma and loaded in equal amounts onto dendritic cells which were then assayed by flow cytometry for the expression of CD80, CD83, CD86 and MHC-class II. The results indicated that a small but appreciable increase in the percent positive population of dendritic cells expressing CD83 was seen upon the loading of the IFN-gamma treated melanoma cells (
As shown in
Discussion from First Study
Protocols for antigen loading, maturation, and administration, in the context of anti-tumor immunity, and guidance on dendritic cell (DC)-based immune therapy are practiced by the skilled artisan. This type of therapy encompasses use of purified autologous tumor cells as the source of antigen, and contains a patient-specific repertoire of tumor-associated antigens (Selvan (2010) Melanoma Res. 20:280-292; Dillman (2007) Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 22:309-321). Some clinical trials are using unpurified autologous bulk tumors. This source of antigen may have contaminating fibroblasts and necrotic tissue (O'Rourke (2007) Melanoma Res. 17:316-322). Tumor stem cell associated antigens may be present in the purified cell lines (Dillman (2006) New Engl. J. Med. 355:1179-1181). IFN-gamma treatment increases expression of MHC class II molecules. MHC class II molecules are important for response to dendritic cell-based therapy. Molecules present in phagocytosed material, such as calreticulin, HMGB-1, and heat shock proteins, may contribute to a maturation signal, where this contribution may be in addition to contributions by cytokine cocktails. The present preparation of DCs shows a trend toward maturation, which can be associated with the phagocytosis of late stage apoptotic cells (Ip (2004) J. Immunol. 173:189-196). Use of apoptotic cells has been correlated with the generation of dendritic cells that were more effective at stimulating lymphocyte IFN-gamma secretion versus dendritic cells loaded with either tumor cell lysates or necrotic cells suggesting that dendritic cells loaded with apoptotic cells may be more potent in vivo. Resistance to the proapoptotic effects of IFN-gamma may be associated with a better clinical outcome (Cornforth (2010) Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 60:123-131). Interleukin-12 (IL-12) secretion by mature DC can lead to robust cytotoxic lymphocyte (CTL; CD8+ T cells) activity. The issue of whether ex vivo maturation leads to lasting tumor immunity, has been addressed. The risk of induction of regulatory T cells, which can suppress antigen specific CTLs, by immature DC has also been shown to occur with cytokine matured DC. A re-evaluation of the sequence of signaling events that leads to maturation is being investigated to improve DC maturation protocols. Thus, the use of irradiated whole tumor cells as the antigen source in this study, without the necessity of ex vivo cytokine maturation, may be a more preferable method of DC immunotherapy since the evidence presented here indicates that the DC have begun the process of maturation. Upon injection, these “maturing” DCs may complete the process of maturation by secreting chemokines which will attract licensing, antigen-specific CD40L expressing CD4+ T cells. Serum chemokines, like CCL17/TARC produced by dendritic cells in response to the adjuvant GM-CSF, have been associated with better progression-free survival rates. In some contexts, activation of lymphocytes by dendritic cells may require the expression of co-stimulatory molecules like CD80 and CD86. As a marker of maturation, CD83, is expressed on mature dendritic cells and may correspond to dendritic cells that can induce a more potent immune response (Prazma (2008) Immunol. Lett. 115:1-8). This represents a fraction of all the cells in the pharmaceutical preparation. The number of mature DCs alone, in any one pharmaceutical regiment, may or may not be correlated with a better patient response.
Table from the First Study
The commercially available melanoma cell lines A375, SK-Mel-5 and SK-Mel-28 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Catalogue numbers: CRL-1619, HTB-70, and HTB-72). A375, SK-Mel-5, and SK-Mel-28 were maintained in 5% fetal bovine serum in RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen, catalogue number 11875-085). The pan-capase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk and its control compound, z-FA-fmk, were purchased from BD Pharmingen (Catalogue numbers: 550377 and 550411). Transfections of GFP-LC3 were performed as per manufacturer instructions (InvivoGen, catalogue numbers psetz-gfplc3 and lyec-12) and photomicrograph were taken on an Olympus BX-51 microscope using a DP72 digital camera. Tumor cells lines were incubated with 1000 U/mL of IFN-γ (InterMune, Cat #) for 72 hours prior to assaying. Patient-specific cell lines were generated as described (Hamai (2008) Cancer Res. 68:9854-9864; Tyring (1984) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 73:1067-1073) by enzymatic digestion of surgical tumor samples, cultivation in RPMI-1640 tissue culture media supplemented with fetal bovine and enriched calf serum (Omega Scientific, San Diego, Calif.) plus 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 mM glutamine and HEPES buffer. Phase contrast photomicrographs were taken on a Olympus CK-2 microscope using a Nikon DS-L1 digital microscope camera.
Dendritic cells were generated by plastic adherence method of ficoled apheresis products (Selvan (2007) Int. J. Cancer. 122:1374-1383; Cornforth (2010) Cancer Immunol. 60:123-131) in antibiotic-free AIM-V medium (Invitrogen, Cat#) supplemented with 1,000 IU/mL each of IL-4 (CellGenix, Cat#) and GM-CSF (Berlex, Seattle, Wash.) (DC medium). The flasks were then cultivated for 6 days prior to loading with IFN-gamma treated, irradiated autologous tumor cells.
Analysis of tumor cell death and changes in major histocompatibility class II expression in response to IFN-gamma were conducted by use of antibodies directed against MHC class II, annexin-V and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) and acquired on a Beckton-Dickenson FACS Calibur® flow cytometer.
Melanoma tumor cell lysates were resolved on 10-12.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with primary antibodies overnight prior to secondary antibody conjugation and development by Novex AP Chromogenic substrate (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) to develop bands. Antibodies against LC3-B antibodies (Cell Signaling Technologies, Boston, Mass.) and GADPH (EMD biosciences, Germany) were used at manufacturers recommended dilutions of 1:100 and 1:10,000, respectively.
What was investigated was the induction of autophagy, apoptosis and MHC class II molecules after IFN-gamma treatment of melanoma tumor cells in vitro. Autologous and model melanoma tumor cell lines were incubated with 1000 IU/mL of IFN-gamma for 72 hours prior to assaying for autophagy, apoptosis and MHC class II expression. Autophagy was detected by immunobloting with antibodies against LC3 II and by flow cytometry with Enzo's CytoID Autophagy Detection Kit. Apoptosis and MHC class II induction were assayed by flow cytometry using 7-AAD and annexin-V staining and antibodies against MHC class II, respectively.
The results demonstrated that IFN-gamma induces both autophagic and apoptotic cell populations in melanoma cell lines. The apoptotic population is predominantly found in the non-adherent population while the autophagic cells remain adherent to the flask. Blocking of autophagy with the inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) inhibits the induction of MHC class II positive cells in response to IFN-gamma (39.4% IFN-gamma vs. 10.0% IFN-gamma+3-MA). Inhibition of caspase activity with the pan caspase inhibitor Z-VAD prevents apoptosis but does not perturb autophagy in IFN-gamma treated cells (2.75±0.15 IFN-gamma vs. 3.04±0.27 IFN-gamma+Z-VAD, fold change). Induction of apoptosis is associated with reduced levels of autophagy and MHC class II expression. Patients receiving autologous tumor cell loaded dendritic cells that are non-apoptotic autophagic cells derived from interferon-gamma treated purified tumor cell lines have improved progression-free and overall survival (p 0.003 and p 0.002, respectively). A procedure to eliminate apoptotic cells while retaining viable autophagic cells after IFN-gamma treatment may enhance the effectiveness of this type of cell-based immunotherapy.
Autologous, proliferating, self-renewing tumor cells (putative tumor stem cells and/or early progenitor cells), are important to establishment of new depots of metastatic cancer, and may be excellent sources of antigen for vaccines. These studies addressed the impact on survival from immunizing with antigens from such cells.
Data was pooled from three successive phase II trials, all of which included patients with documented metastatic melanoma, who were treated in protocols that utilized antigens from cell cultures of autologous tumor cells. S.C. injections were given weekly for 3 weeks, then monthly for 5 months: 74 patients were injected with irradiated tumor cells (TC): 54 patients were injected with autologous dendritic cells (DC) that had been co-cultured with irradiated autologous tumor cells (NCI-V01-1646): in a randomized phase II trial, 24 patients were injected with TC, and 18 with DC.
Table 2 summarizes overall survival (OS) in each trial. In the pooled analysis there were 98 TC and 72 DC patients. Characteristics were similar in terms of age (51, 52), male gender (62%, 62%), no evidence of disease at the time of treatment (46%, 47%), and presence of M1c visceral disease at the time of treatment (13%, 14%). OS was longer in patients treated with DC (median 63.1 vs 20.2 months, 5-year OS 51% vs 26%, p=0.0002 Mantle-Cox log-rank test). The difference in OS in the randomized trial is also significant (p=0.007).
Patient-specific DC vaccines primed with antigens from autologous proliferating, self-renewing tumor cells are associated with encouraging long-term survival rates, and are superior to patient-specific TC vaccines in populations of patients who have been diagnosed with metastatic melanoma.
The survival curves from the three trials of patient specific vaccines are shown in
A non-limiting standard operating procedure for preparing dendritic cell vaccine includes the following (Table 3). Upon harvesting tumor cells after expansion, the following are to be made for each patient's tumor cell lot. What is needed is about 220 million cells to make the tumor cell vaccine lot. Any extra cells are to be cryopreserved as back up cells. Make stock cell suspension as 220×106 cells in 22 ml medium to distribute in the following manner (Table 3).
Trial #2: DC 2000-2006 (NCI-V01-1646). Phase II Trial of Autologous Dendritic Cells Loaded with Antigens from Irradiated Autologous Tumor Cells as Patient Specific Vaccines (BB-IND 8554): Dendritic Cell (DC) Vaccine. In the production of the vaccine for this trial, autologous proliferating tumor cells were co-incubated with IFN-gamma, cryopreserved, and then subsequently co-incubated with autologous dendritic cells. Each aliquot of cells was suspended in 500 micrograms of GM-CSF for injection
Trial #3: DC vs. TC 2007-2011 (NCT00436930): Randomized Phase II Trial Of Autologous Vaccines Consisting Of Adjuvant GM-CSF plus Proliferating Tumor Cells Versus GM-CSF Plus Dendritic Cells Loaded With Proliferating Tumor Cells In Patients With Metastatic Melanoma (BB-IND 8554 and BB-IND 5838): ‘MAC VAC.’ The third trial was a randomized trial to determine whether there was a difference in the two approaches noted above. IFN-gamma was not used in the production of the tumor cells. As in the DC trial above, all patients were randomized to receive either TC or DC injected s.c. with 500 micrograms of GM-CSF, weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for five months. The projected 72% 2-year survival rate for patients in the DC arm is comparable to the 71% observed 2-year survival observed in the previous 54-patient trial of DC in which the median survival was five years.
The following provides flow cytometry data from studies of colon cancer cells (endoderm), ovarian cancer cells (mixed mesoderm plus extra-embryonic), glioblastoma cells (ectoderm), and renal cancer cells (mesoderm). The embryological points of origin of each of these types of cells is indicated in parenthesis. Melanoma cells are of neurocrest origin. Table 3 summarizes the tumor cell types, while Table 4 summarizes the results from experiments on these cells, where the cells were treated with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma).
Tumor cells have various similarities with adult stem cells, such as potential to self-propagate and differentiate in more mature type of cells. The following data demonstrate that autophagia is phenomenon that can be induced to tumor cells derived from all embryonic layers. In addition to melanoma, which originated from cells derived from neurocrest, the present study involved tumors generated in tissue derived from endoderm (colon), mesoderm (kidney), ectoderm (glioblastoma) and mixed mesoderm plus extra-embryonic (ovarian).
Table 4 discloses the following results. Autophagy was shown to be induced in the tumor types examined based on the induction of MHC class II complexes in the absence of apoptosis (phosphatidylserine exposure) in the adherent cell populations upon interferon-gamma treatment.
Pure tumor cells were generated from colon, ovarian, glioblastoma, and renal cell carcinoma according to Dillman and Comforth, et al. (Cornforth, et al. (2011) Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 60:123-131; Dillman, et al. (1993) J. Immunother. Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 14:65-69; Dillman, et al. (2000) Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 15:161-168; Dillman, et al. (1999) 14:443-449; Dillman et al. (2000) 15:161-168).
Briefly, tumor biopsies from surgical samples were enzymatically processed into single cell suspensions and purified cell lines generated by differential attachment and serum starvation. The cell lines generated were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen, thawed and treated with or without interferon-gamma in 5% fetal bovine serum/RPMI media for 72 hours. After exposure to interferon-gamma, the non-adherent cells were analyzed separately from the adherent cells by flow-cytometry. The markers investigated were MHC class I, MHC class II, Annexin V (apoptosis), and 7-ADD (viability).
MHC class II molecules are normally expressed exclusively on specialized cells such as dendritic cells, mononuclear phagocytes, B lymphocytes, some endothelial cells and thymus. As shown in Table 4, the expression of MHC class II was found clearly expressed by all the investigated samples as the result of the described in-vitro manipulations. Some of the samples were more sensitive to IFN-gamma and resulted in induction of apoptosis which may be a feature associated with the expression of apoptotic pathway proteins such as caspases and bcl family proteins.
MHC class II molecule expression on the tumor cells after the described in vitro manipulations is the result of lysosomal processing, thus the results indicate that induction of autophagy occurs in the adherent, non-apoptotic population in tumor cell lines derived from all embryonic germ layers (ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm) exemplified here by colon, ovarian, glioblastoma and renal cell carcinoma. This response to the interferon-gamma is identical with the response seen with melanoma cells and suggests that this feature could be used as means to generate non-apoptotic autophagic cells populations that we show to be the key component in cell-based immunotherapy for cancer. The MHC class II presenting tumor cells as the result of autophagy can interact directly with the helper T lymphocytes (CD4+ T cells) and induce an immune response. The complex of dendritic cells and autophagic tumor cells induce a faster and more robust response in patients compared to other immune therapies that are based on dendritic cells alone, non-manipulated tumor cell population or cell lysate from tumors, as demonstrated by our clinical data.
The use of MHC class II expression as surrogate marker for autophagy in response to interferon-gamma treatment is well supported by the evidence presented here and in cited works that show that autophagy has been described to participate in the translocation of endogenous protein into the MHC class II loading compartment. This effect is revealed by the increase in the expression of MHC class II complexes on the surface of autophagic cells (see, e.g., Crotzer and Blum (2009) J. Immunol. 182:3335-3341). The present disclosure, or cited priority documents, demonstrates that the use of the autophagy inhibitor 3-methyl adenine resulted in the loss of MHC class II expression despite treatment with interferon-gamma. Thus, measurement of the induction of MHC class II can be used as a surrogate marker for autophagy.
Thus, while there have shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the disclosure as applied to an exemplary implementation and/or aspects thereof, it will be understood that various omissions, reconfigurations and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the exemplary implementations, disclosure and aspects thereof may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the disclosure and/or claims. For example, it is expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps which perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the disclosure. Moreover, it should be recognized that structures and/or elements and/or method steps shown and/or described in connection with any disclosed form or implementation may be incorporated in any other disclosed or described or suggested form or implementation as a general matter of design choice. It is the intention, therefore, to not limit the scope of the disclosure. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto.
All publications, patents, patent applications, references, and sequence listings, cited in this specification are herein incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein.
The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 CFR §1.72(b) to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. The Abstract is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims.
This application claims the full Paris Convention priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/594,304, filed on Feb. 2, 2012, the contents of which is incorporated by this reference, as if fully set forth in its entirety herein.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2013/024123 | 1/31/2013 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61594304 | Feb 2012 | US |
