Patent Application
20170028787
This application claims priority of Japanese Patent Application No.: 2015-150098 filed on Jul. 29, 2015, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Technical Field
The present invention relates to a pneumatic tire.
In a pneumatic radial tire for a heavy load used for a vehicle such as a truck or a bus, it has been known that a belt layer arranged between a carcass and a tread portion includes a reinforcement belt with cords having a small inclination angle with respect to the tire-circumferential direction (cord angle) of 0 to, 5 degrees (see JP 2007-45334 A, JP 2005-104437 A, JP 2014-189243 A, Japanese Patent No. 5182455, JP 11-502166 A, for example). The reinforcement belt is intended to suppress a growth of the tire in the radial direction.
The small cord angle of the reinforcement belt ranging from approximately 0 to 5 degrees increases a force for holding a shape of the tread portion to reduce distortion at an end portion of the belt, and therefore is advantageous in view of belt durability.
However, the small cord angle of the reinforcement belt ranging from approximately 0 to 5 degrees causes an excessively large binding force in a tire-radial direction, thereby promoting an increased tendency in the deformation of a tire in the tire-width direction. The increased deformation in the tire-width direction increases the deformation of the tire at an area ranging from a bead portion to a portion having a largest width in a tire cross section. As a result, distortion in the bead portion is increased, causing lower resistance against a defect such as separation in the bead portion (bead durability).
It is an object of the present invention to provide a pneumatic tire where the bead durability is enhanced while ensuring an effect of suppressing a growth of the tire in a radial direction and belt durability.
An aspect of the present invention provides a pneumatic tire comprising a belt layer arranged between a carcass and a tread portion, wherein the belt layer comprises a first main working belt, a second main working belt arranged at an outer side of the first main working belt in a tire-radial direction, the second main working belt having a cord angle which differs from a cord angle of the first main working belt in a direction with respect to a tire-circumferential direction, and a reinforcement belt, a cord angle of the reinforcement belt is not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees, a width of the reinforcement belt is equal to or wider than 50% of a tire-section width and not wider than a width of a narrower one of the first and second main working belts, and the width of the reinforcement belt is equal to or wider than 30% of a periphery length of the carcass and not wider than 50% thereof.
In this specification, the term “cord angle” is defined an acute angle which a cord of a belt or a ply forms with respect to a tire-circumferential direction. When the cord extends in the tire-circumferential direction, the cord angle is 0 degrees.
The cord angle of the reinforcement belt is set to a value not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees, instead of setting the cord angle to a small angle such as an angle of not smaller than 0 degrees and not larger than 5 degrees (an angle substantially regarded as 0 degrees or an angle close to such angle). Such configuration can obviate a phenomenon where a binding force in a tire-radial direction generated by the reinforcement belt becomes excessively large, and therefore can suppress the excessively large deformation of the tire in the tire-width direction. As a result, the distortion generated in the bead portion can be suppressed, and therefore bead durability can be enhanced.
By setting the cord angle of the reinforcement belt to be not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees, as compared to a case where the cord angle of the reinforcement belt is set to a small angle such as an angle not smaller than 0 degrees and not larger than 5 degrees, it is possible to alleviate bending of the cord in the vicinity of a ground-contact surface, thereby effectively preventing cord breakage.
The cord angle of the reinforcement belt set to a value not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees reduces an effect of suppressing a growth of the tire in the tire-radial direction compared to the case where the cord angle is set to a value not smaller than 0 degrees and not larger than 5 degrees. However, the cord angle of the reinforcement belt is allowed to take 9 degrees at maximum, and therefore there is no possibility that a binding force in the tire-radial direction is excessively reduced. Further, the width of the reinforcement belt is equal to or wider than 50% of a tire-section width. That is, the reinforcement belt has a sufficiently wide width instead of the narrow width. Due to the above-mentioned reasons, the tire can ensure a desired effect of suppressing a growth of the tire in the radial direction. Further, the tire can acquire a sufficient force for holding a shape of the tread portion so that distortion at an end portion of the belt can be reduced whereby the tire can ensure required belt durability. The width of the reinforcement belt is not wider than either narrower one of the first and second main working belts. Accordingly, the distortion generated in the reinforcement belt can be reduced.
The width of the reinforcement belt is set to be not wider than the width of the narrower one of the first and second main working belts. Therefore, the cord is unlikely to be broken.
The width of the reinforcement belt is preferably equal to or wider than 30% of a periphery length of the carcass and not wider than 50% thereof.
The width of the reinforcement belt is set to be equal to or wider than 30% of the periphery length of the carcass. Therefore, an effect of suppressing a growth amount in the tire-radial direction is not reduced. Moreover, the width dimension of the reinforcement belt is set to be not wider than 50% of the periphery length of the carcass. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the generation of belt breakage.
As described above, according to the pneumatic tire of the present invention, it is possible to enhance partial abrasion resistance while ensuring suppression of a growth in the tire-radial direction and bead durability.
Preferably, the reinforcement belt is arranged between the first main working belt and the second main working belt.
Arranging the reinforcement belt between the first main working belt and the second main working belt can alleviate breakage of the cord in the vicinity of a road contact surface, and therefore cord breakage can be effectively prevented.
The cord angles of the first and second main working belts can be respectively 20±10 degrees. Further, the cord angles of the first and second main working belts can be respectively 17±5 degrees.
The belt layer can further comprise, a protection belt arranged at an outer side of the second main working belt in the tire-radial direction.
The belt layer can further comprise a buffer belt arranged at an inner side of the first main working belt in the tire-radial direction.
The pneumatic tire can have an aspect ratio of not larger than 70% and a nominal section width of not smaller than 365.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for manufacturing a pneumatic tire including a belt layer arranged between a carcass and a tread portion, the method comprising providing the belt layer which includes, in order from a tire inner diameter side, a first main working belt, a reinforcement belt having a cord angle not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees and having a belt width equal to or wider than 50% of a tire-section width and equal to or wider than 30% of a periphery length of the carcass and not wider than 50% thereof, and a second main working belt having a cord angle different from a cord angle of the first main working belt in a direction with respect to a tire-circumferential direction.
According to the present invention, it is possible to enhance partial abrasion resistance while ensuring an effect of suppressing a growth in the tire-radial direction and belt durability.
The foregoing and the other features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and drawings of an illustrative embodiment of the invention in which:
The tire 1 includes a tread portion 2, a pair of side portions 4, and a pair of bead portions 6. The bead portions 6 are respectively formed on inner edge portions of the side portions 4 in a tire-radial direction (edge portions of the side portions 4 opposite to the tread portion 2). A carcass 8 is arranged between the pair of bead portions 6. An inner liner (not shown in the drawing) is arranged in an innermost peripheral surface of the tire 1. A belt layer 10 is arranged between the carcass 8 and a tread surface of the tread portion 2. In other words, in the tread portion 2, the belt layer 10 is arranged at an outer side of the carcass 8 in the tire-radial direction. As described later in detail, in this embodiment, the belt layer 10 includes five belts 11 to 15.
The bead portion 6 includes a bead core 22, a bead filler 24, and a chafer 26. The bead core 22 is obtained by bundling a plurality of wires to form a hexagonal section. The bead core 22 is formed to have a sectional shape in which two opposed sides are longer than the other sides. The bead core 22 is arranged obliquely in such a manner that a direction in which the longest one of three diagonal lines (a first diagonal line 22a) extends is set to a lower side from an outer diameter side of the tire 1 toward an inner diameter side thereof. Around the bead core 22, an end portion of the carcass 8 in a tire-width direction is wound up from an inner side to an outer side in the tire-width direction along the bead filler 24. The chafer 26 is arranged around the bead filler 24 so as to be adjacent to an outer side of the end portion of the carcass 8.
Referring to
Referring to
The buffet belt 11 is arranged adjacently to an outer side of the carcass 8 in the tire-radial direction. The first main working belt 12 is arranged adjacently to an outer side of the buffer belt 11 in the tire-radial direction. The second main working belt 14 is arranged at an outer side of the first main working belt 12 in the tire-radial direction. The protection belt 15 is arranged adjacently to an outer side of the second main working belt 14 in the tire-radial direction.
The reinforcement belt 13 is arranged between the first main working belt 12 and the second main working belt 14. That is, the reinforcement belt 13 is arranged adjacently to the outer side of the first main working belt 12 in the tire-radial direction, and is also arranged adjacently to an inner side of the second main working belt 14 in the tire-radial direction.
A width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set in such a manner that a ratio W3/P to a periphery length P of the carcass 8 satisfies 0.3≦W3/P≦0.5. Herein, a linear distance between both outer ends of the reinforcement belt 13 in a tire meridian section is set to be the width W3 of the reinforcement belt in a state where the tire is assembled to a wheel at an internal pressure determined by the Tire and Rim Association, Inc (TRA). Moreover, the periphery length P of the carcass 8 is set to be a length in the tire meridian section in the state where the tire is assembled to the wheel at the internal pressure determined by TRA in the same manner. That is, a curve length connecting positions corresponding to inner ends of the bead core 22 of the carcass 8 (an intersection P2 with the first diagonal line 22a) (a length which is twice the curve length connecting P1 and P2 in
Main functions of the first and second main working belts 12 and 14 are to apply a binding force in the tire-radial direction to the carcass 8 (with a cord angle θ0 being set to 90 degrees). A main function of the reinforcement belt 13 is to compensate for the shortage in a binding force in the tire-radial direction which is applied to the tire 1 by the first and second main working belts 12 and 14. A main function of the protection belt 15 is to enhance external damage resistance of the tire 1 by protecting the first and second main working belts 12 and 14. A main function of the buffer belt 11 is to enhance impact resistance of the tire 1.
Each of these belts 11 to 15 is formed of a plurality belt cords 11a to 15a arranged parallel to each other and coated by a rubber layer.
Referring
In this embodiment, the cord angle θ2 of the belt cord 12a of the first main working belt 12 is set to 17 degrees (right upward direction). The cord angle θ2 can be set to any value which falls within a range of 20±10 degrees, and can preferably be set to a value which falls within a range of 17±5 degrees.
In this embodiment, the cord angle θ4 of the belt cord 14a of the second main working belt 14 is set to 17 degrees (left upward direction). The cord angle θ4 can be set to a value which falls within a range of 20±10 degrees, and can preferably be set to a value which falls within a range of 17±5 degrees.
The cord angles θ2 and θ4 of the first and second main working belts 12, 14 are set so that the belt cords 12a and 14a extend in different directions with respect to the center line Ce in the tire-width direction. That is, one of the cord angles θ2 and θ4 is set so that the belt cords extend in the right upward direction, and the other of them is set so that the belt cords extend in the left upward direction.
The cord angle θ3 of the belt cord 13a of the reinforcement belt 13 is set to 7 degrees (left upward direction) in this embodiment. The cord angle θ3 can he set to a value which falls within a range of not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees.
The cord angle θ1 of the belt cord 11a of the buffer belt 11 is set to 65 degrees in this embodiment. The cord angle θ1 can be set to a value which falls within a range of 60±15 degrees.
The cord angle θ5 of the belt cord 15a of the protection belt 15 is set to 20 degrees in this embodiment. The cord angle θ5 can be set to a value which falls within a range of 20±10 degrees.
Numerical values (including upper and lower limit values of a numerical value range) of the cord angles θ1 to θ5 can include substantially unavoidable errors, and are not necessarily geometrically precise values as long as that functions required for the belts 11 to 15 are satisfied. This is also applied to the cord angle θ0 of the carcass cords 8a.
The cord angles θ1 to θ5 of the belts 11 to 15 can be coordinated as shown in the following Table 1.
Main data except for the cord angles of the belts 11 to 15 in this embodiment are shown in the following Table 2
As shown in Table 2, in this embodiment, a width W4 (325 mm) of the second main working belt 14 which is arranged relatively outer side in the tire-radial direction is set narrower than a width W2 (370 mm) of the first main working belt 12 which is arranged relatively inner side in the tire-radial direction.
A width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set to a value equal to or wider than 50% of a maximum tire-section width Wt (W3≧0.5 Wt). In this embodiment, the maximum tire-section width Wt is a value set under conditions where the tire 1 is mounted on a predetermined rim (a rim 31 is schematically shown in
Moreover, the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set in such a manner that a ratio W3/T to a width T of the tread portion 2 satisfies 0.66≦W3/T≦0.95, preferably 0.66≦W3/T≦0.82. If W3/T is smaller than 0.66, an effect of suppressing a growth amount in a tire-radial direction and tire performance are reduced. If W3/T exceeds 0.82, particularly, 0.95, the tire performance is enhanced but belt breakage occurs.
Furthermore, the width W3 of the reinforcement belt. 13 is set in such a manner that a ratio W3/S to a maximum width S of the carcass 8 satisfies 0.60≦W3/S≦0.74. If W3/S is smaller than 0.60, the effect of suppressing a growth amount In the tire-radial direction and the tire performance are reduced. If W3/S exceeds 0.74, the tire performance is enhanced but the belt breakage occurs.
The cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is is set to an angle of not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees, instead of a small angle of not smaller than 0 degrees to not more than 5 degrees (an angle which can be substantially regarded as 0 degrees or an angle close to 0 degrees). Such configuration can prevent a binding force in a tire-radial direction generated by a reinforcement belt 13 from becoming excessively large, and therefore the excessively large deformation of the tire in the tire-width direction can be suppressed. Since the excessively large deformation of the tire in the tire-width direction can be suppressed, the distortion generated in the bead portion 6 can be suppressed, and therefore bead durability (resistance against the generation of a defect such as separation in the bead portion) can be enhanced.
As conceptually shown in
As described above, the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set narrower than the width W4 of the second main working belt 14 which is narrower one of the first and second main working belts 12, 14. Such configuration can also effectively prevent cord breakage of the belt cord 13a of the reinforcement belt.
As described above, the reinforcement belt 13 is arranged between the first main working belt 12 and the second main working belt 14. Due to such an arrangement, the reinforcement belt 13 is protected by the first and second main working belts 14, and therefore cord breakage of the belt cord 13a of the reinforcement belt 13 caused due to bending of the cord in the vicinity of the road contact surface 2a (symbols in
Due to these reasons, cord breakage of the reinforcement belt 13 can be effectively prevented.
By setting the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 to a value not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees, an effect of suppressing a growth of the tire 1 in the radial direction is reduced compared to the case where the cord angle θ3 is set to a value not smaller than 0 degrees and not larger than 5 degrees. However, the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is 9 degrees at maximum, and therefore there is no possibility that a binding force in the tire-radial direction is excessively reduced. Further, as described above, the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is equal to or wider than 50% of a maximum tire-section width Wt. That is, a width of the reinforcement belt 13 is not narrow but is sufficiently wide. Due to these reasons, the tire 1 can ensure a required effect of suppressing a growth of the tire 1 in the radial direction. Further, the tire can acquire a sufficient force for holding a shape of the tread portion 2 so that distortion at the end portion of the belt can be reduced whereby the tire can ensure required belt durability. The width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is narrower than a width of the narrower one of the first and second main working belts 12 and 14 (widths W2, W4). Accordingly, the distortion generated in the reinforcement belt 13 can be reduced.
As described above, according to the tire 1 of the present embodiment, bead durability can be enhanced while an effect of suppressing a growth of the tire 1 in the radial direction and belt durability are also ensured.
Tires according to Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and tires according to Examples 1 to 4 shown in the following Table 3 were subjected to an evaluation test performed for evaluating belt durability and bead durability. Assume that data which are not described particularly hereinafter are shared in common by the tires according to Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and the tires according to Examples 1 to 4. Particularly, in all of Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and the tires according to Examples 1 to 4, a tire size is set to 445/50R22.5.
A belt layer 10 according to Comparative Example 1 shown in
In the tire according to Comparative Example 2, a cord angle θ3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 0 degrees, which is smaller than a lower limit value of a range of a cord angle θ3 (not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) in the present invention.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 3, a cord angle θ3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 5 degrees, which is smaller than the lower limit value of the range of the cord angle θ3 not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) in the present invention.
In the tire of Comparative Example 4, a cord angle θ3 according to a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 10 degrees, which is larger than an upper limit value of the range of the cord angle θ3 (not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) in the present invention.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 5, a width W3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 180 mm. A tire 1 is mounted on a predetermined rim, the tire is filled with air until a tire internal pressure reaches a predetermined internal pressure, and a maximum tire-section width in an unloaded state is set to 440 mm. Accordingly, in Comparative Example 5, a ratio of the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 to a maximum tire section width Wt is 41%. Accordingly, the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 according to Comparative Example 5 is narrower than a lower limit value of a width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 (W3=0.5 Wt) in the present invention.
In the tire of Example 1, a cord angle θ3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 6 degrees, which is the lower limit value of the range of the cord angle θ3 (not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) in the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 2, a cord angle θ3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 7 degrees, which is a value close to a center value of the range of the cord angle θ3 (not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) in the present invention.
In the, tire according to Example 3, a cord angle θ3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 9 degrees, which is the upper limit value of the range of the cord angle θ3 (not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) in the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 4, a width W3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to 220 mm. As described later, a maximum tire-section width under the conditions of the evaluation test is set to 440 mm. Accordingly, a ratio of the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 in Example 4 to the maximum tire-section width Wt is 50%. That is, the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 in Example 4 is a lower limit value of the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 (W3=0.5 Wt) in the present invention.
In this evaluation test, belt durability and bead durability are evaluated.
In evaluating belt durability, each tire has a tire size of 445/50R22.5, the tire is mounted on a wheel having a rim size of 22.5×14.00 (specified rim), and the tire is filled with air having a pressure of 930 kPa (a value obtained by adding 100 kPa to 830 kPa which is an internal pressure determined by TRA). Each tire mounted on the wheel is mounted on a drum tester, and a traveling test is performed under conditions where a speed is set to 40 km/h and a load is set to 54.4 kN. In such a case, traveling distances of respective tires before the tires are broken are expressed as indexes respectively as shown in Table 3.
In evaluating bead durability, each tire has a tire size of 445/50R22.5, the tire was mounted on a wheel having a rim size of 22.5×14.00 (specified rim), and the tire was filled with air having a pressure of 900 kPa (a value obtained by adding 70 kPa to 830 kPa which is an internal pressure specified by TRA). Each tire mounted on the wheel was mounted on a drum tester, and a traveling test was performed under conditions where a speed is set to 40 km/h and a load is set to 72.5 kN. In such a case, traveling distances of respective tires before the tires were broken are expressed as indexes respectively as shown in Table 3.
An internal pressure of air filled in the tire and a load applied to the tire differ between the evaluation of belt durability and the evaluation of bead durability. The reason is that the condition that distortion is liable to be generated in the belt layer 10 is adopted in the evaluation of belt durability, while the condition that distortion is liable to be generated in the bead portion 6 is adopted in evaluation of bead durability.
In both belt durability and bead durability, assuming the performance of the tire according to Comparative Example 1 as 100, performances of tires according to the remaining Comparative Examples 2 to 5 and Examples 1 to 4 are indexed.
In all Examples 1 to 4, the indexes of belt durability are not smaller than 110, showing that all tires have favorable belt durability. In all Examples 1 to 4, indexes of bead durability are not smaller than 105, showing that the tires can have favorable bead durability.
In the tires according to Comparative Examples 2 and 3 where the cord angles θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 are lower than a lower limit value of the range of the cord angle θ3 (not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) in the present invention, although indexes of belt durability exceed 110, indexes of bead durability are lower than 105. That is, in the case where a cord angle θ3 of a reinforcement belt 13 is set to an angle smaller than a value which falls within the range of the cord angle θ3 according to the present invention, even when a tire has the same belt durability as the tires according to Examples 1 to 4, the tire cannot acquire sufficient bead durability.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 4 where the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 exceeds the upper limit value of the range of the cord angle θ3 (not smaller than 6 degrees and not larger than 9 degrees) of the invention, although an index of bead durability exceeds 105, an index of belt durability is lower than 110. That is, in the case where the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set to an angle larger than a value which falls within the range of the present invention, even when a tire has the same bead durability as the tires of Examples 1 to 4, the tire cannot acquire sufficient belt durability.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 5 where a ratio of a width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 to a maximum tire-section width Wt is lower than the lower limit value of the range (equal to or wider than 50% of maximum tire-section width) in the present invention, an index of bead durability is lower than 105, and an index of belt durability is lower than 110. That is, when the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is narrower than a value which falls within the range of the present invention, the tire cannot acquire sufficient bead durability and sufficient belt durability.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 4 in which the reinforcement belt 13 is arranged on an inner side of the first main working belt 12 in the tire-radial direction, although the index of the bead durability exceeds 105, the index of the belt durability is slightly lower than 110. Accordingly, in view of enhancement in the belt durability, it is preferable that the reinforcement belt 13 is arranged between the first main working belt 12 and the second main working belt 14 rather than on the inner side of the first main working belt 12 in the tire-radial direction.
As described above, by comparing the tires according to Comparative Examples 1 to 5 and the tires according to Examples 1 to 4, it is understood that, according to the present invention, bead durability can be enhanced while belt durability in the pneumatic tire is also ensured.
Moreover, tires according to Comparative Examples 11 to 18 and Examples 11 to 19 shown in the following Table 4 were subjected to an evaluation test performed for evaluating the partial abrasion resistance and the belt durability in the tread portion. Assume that data which are not described particularly hereinafter are shared in common by the tires according to Comparative Examples and the tires according to Examples. Particularly, in all of Comparative Examples and Examples, a tire size is set to 445/50R22.5. Moreover, except for Comparative Example 12 and Examples 12 and 13, the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set to 7 degrees.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 11, similarly to the tire according to Comparative Example 1, the belt layer does not include the reinforcement belt and is configured by four other belts (the buffer belt 11, the first main working belt 12, the second main working belt 14, and the protection belt 15).
In the tire according to Comparative Example 12, the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set to 0 degrees. As to the width W3 of the reinforcement belt 13, the ratio W3/P to the periphery length P of the carcass 8 is 0.38, the ratio W3/T to the width T of the tread portion 2 is 0.74, and the ratio W3/S to the maximum width S of the carcass 8 is 0.67.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 13, the ratio W3/P is 0.28, which is smaller than the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.66, which is the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.60, which is the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 14, the ratio W3/P is 0.52, which is larger than the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.82, which is the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.74, which is the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 15, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is an approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.62, which is smaller than the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.67, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 16, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is an approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.86, which is larger than the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.67, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 17, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is an approximately center value of the range not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.74, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.56, which is smaller than the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Comparative Example 18, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is an approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.74, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.78, which is larger than the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 11, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is an approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.74, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.67, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 12, the ratios W3/P, W3/T, and W3/S are the same as those in Example 11, except that the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set to 6 degrees.
In the tire according to Example 13, similarly to the tire according to Example 12, the ratios W3/P, W3/T, and W3/S are the same as those in Example 11, except that the cord angle θ3 of the reinforcement belt 13 is set to 9 degrees.
In the tire according to Example 14, the ratio W3/P is 0.30, which is the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T, is 0.67, which is a value close to the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.60, which is the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 15, the ratio W3/P is 0.50, which is the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.82, which is the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/5 is 0.74, which is the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 16, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is the approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.67, which is the value close to the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/5 is 0.67, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 17, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is the approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.82, which is the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.67, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 18, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is the approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.74, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.60, which is the lower limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In the tire according to Example 19, the ratio W3/P is 0.38, which is the approximately center value of the range (not smaller than 0.3 and not larger than 0.5) according to the present invention. Moreover, the ratio W3/T is 0.74, which is the center value of the range (not smaller than 0.66 and not larger than 0.82) according to the present invention. Furthermore, the ratio W3/S is 0.74, which is the upper limit value of the range (not smaller than 0.60 and not larger than 0.74) according to the present invention.
In this evaluation test, the partial abrasion resistance and the belt durability were evaluated.
In the evaluation of the partial abrasion resistance, a tire having a tire size of 44.5/50R22.5 was mounted on a wheel having a rim size of 22.5×14.00 (predetermined rim) and the tire was filled with air of 830 kPa. (internal pressure determined by TRA). A traveling test was performed under conditions where a speed is set to 80 km/h and a load is set to 4625 kg (TRA 100% load), and an abrasion energy ratio acting on a block on the center line Ce and a shoulder block was expressed as an index. The evaluation for the belt durability is performed in the same manner as described above.
In both the partial abrasion resistance and the belt durability in the tread portion 2, assuming the performance of the tire according to Comparative Example 11 as 100, the performance of tires according to the remaining Comparative Examples 12 to 18 and Examples 11 to 19 were indexed. As to the partial abrasion resistance, a partial abrasion is small within a range of an index of 90 to 110. Consequently, the partial abrasion resistance is excellent. When the index is lower than 100, an abrasion amount of the block on the centerline Ce side is larger than that of the shoulder block 43a. To the contrary, when the index exceeds 100, the abrasion amount of the shoulder block 43a is larger than that of the block on the center line Ce side. The partial abrasion occurs extremely with an index equal to or lower than 90 and equal to or greater than 110. Consequently, it is possible to determine that an improper state for the tire performance is brought. On the other hand, as to the belt durability, the index lower than 100 is improper for the tire performance, and the belt durability is more excellent if a numeric value is larger.
In all of Comparative Examples 11 to 18, there were problems in the tire performance and improper values were shown for the partial abrasion resistance. Moreover, in Comparative Examples 15 and 18, improper values were shown for the belt durability.
On the other hand, favorable tire performance was obtained in all of Examples 11 to 19. In Example 11, particularly, all of the ratios W3/P, W3/T, and W3/S were set to the center values of the set ranges. Consequently, the most favorable, results were obtained for both the partial abrasion resistance and the belt durability.
As described above, by comparing the tires according to Comparative Examples 11 to 18 and the tires according to Examples 11 to 19, it is understood that, according to the pneumatic tire of the present invention, both the partial abrasion resistance and the belt durability can be enhanced.
The tire according to the present invention is favorably applicable to a pneumatic tire (so-called super single tire) having an aspect ratio of not larger than 70% and a nominal section width of not smaller than 365. The tire according to the present invention is also applicable to a pneumatic tire having a small aspect ratio and falling outer side a range of a pneumatic radial tire for heavy load.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-150098 | Jul 2015 | JP | national |
