The present technology relates to a pneumatic tire suitable as a tire used for driving on unpaved roads, and more specifically relates to a pneumatic tire providing enhanced driving performance on unpaved roads and enhanced wear resistance performance.
For pneumatic tires used for driving on unpaved roads such as uneven ground, muddy ground, snowy roads, sandy ground, and rocky areas, a tread pattern is generally employed that is based on lug grooves or blocks including many edge components and that has a large groove area. For such a tire, driving performance on unpaved roads is improved by biting into mud, snow, sand, stone, rock, or the like (hereinafter, referred to collectively as “mud or the like”) on a road surface to achieve traction performance and preventing grooves from being blocked with mud or the like (for example, see Japan Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2009-220779).
However, in such a tire, the groove area is set to a large value in order to sufficiently bite into mud or the like, or a sipe is formed in each block in order to increase the number of edge components. Thus, there is a problem in that block rigidity is likely to decrease, leading to difficulty in providing both improved driving performance on unpaved roads (in particular, traction performance and starting performance) and ensured wear resistance of the blocks in a compatible manner to a high degree. Thus, there is a demand for measures for effectively biting into mud or the like via grooves to improve driving performance (mud performance) on unpaved roads (in particular, muddy roads), while ensuring sufficient wear resistance of the blocks, and providing such performances in a well-balanced, compatible manner.
The present technology provides a pneumatic tire, which is suitable as a tire used for driving on unpaved roads and provides enhanced driving performance on unpaved roads and enhanced wear resistance performance.
A pneumatic tire according to the present technology includes a tread portion extending in a tire circumferential direction and having an annular shape, a pair of sidewall portions arranged on both sides of the tread portion, and a pair of bead portions arranged inward of the pair of sidewall portions in a tire radial direction, wherein the tread portion includes a plurality of longitudinal grooves extending in the tire circumferential direction, a plurality of lateral grooves extending in a tire lateral direction, and a plurality of blocks defined by the plurality of longitudinal grooves and the plurality of lateral grooves, notch portions are formed in portions of a freely-selected pair of blocks adjacent to each other across a longitudinal groove, the portions facing the longitudinal groove, the notch portions face with each other across the longitudinal groove, and the notch portion has a notch width and a notch depth larger on a center side in an extension direction of the longitudinal groove than on an outer side in the extension direction of the longitudinal groove.
In the present technology, for the tire, which includes the blocks as its basis and is provided to enhance driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance), the pair of notch portions facing with each other across the longitudinal groove are further formed in the pair of blocks adjacent to each other in the tire lateral direction, as described above. Thus, when the pair of blocks are deformed toward the longitudinal groove side while traveling, mud or the like in an area surrounded by the pair of notch portions is compressed, and a high shear force can be obtained. As a result, driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) can be enhanced effectively. In this case, the notch width and the notch depth are larger on the center side in the extension direction of the longitudinal groove than on the outer side in the extension direction. Thus, even when the notch portion is provided, wear resistance can be maintained satisfactorily.
In the present technology, each of the plurality of blocks preferably has a sipe having a groove width of 1.5 mm or less extending in the tire lateral direction or a shallow groove having a groove depth of 2 mm or less, the shallow groove being provided with a sipe with a groove width of 1.5 mm or less in the groove, and only the sipe or only the sipe and the shallow groove preferably communicate with the notch portion. As described above, only the sipe or only the combination of the sipe and the shallow groove is caused to communicate with the notch portion. As a result, an edge effect due to the sipe or the shallow groove can be imparted, which is advantageous in enhancing driving performance on unpaved roads.
In the present technology, the notch width of the notch portion preferably falls within a range from 10% to 25% of a tire lateral direction length of the block. By setting the notch width as described above, the size of the notch portion is optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner.
In the present technology, a portion of the notch portion, which has the largest notch depth, is preferably positioned at 35% or greater of a maximum groove depth of the longitudinal groove from the groove bottom of the longitudinal groove. With this, the notch depth can be optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner.
In the present technology, a ratio of an area of the notch portion on the road contact surface of the block with respect to a projected area of the road contact surface of the block preferably falls within a range from 3% to 16%. By setting the area of the notch portion as described above, the size of the notch portion is optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner.
In the present technology, the notch length of the notch portion preferably falls within a range from 40% to 75% of a tire circumferential direction length of the block provided with the notch portion. By setting the notch length as described above, the size of the notch portion is optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner.
In the present technology, the notch portion preferably has a bottom portion formed of a surface parallel with the road contact surface of the block. By providing the bottom portion as described above, the notch portion can compress mud or the like efficiently, and a shear force can further be enhanced. This is advantageous in enhancing driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance).
In the present technology, the dimensions are dimensions on the tread contact surface unless otherwise noted. “Road contact surface” of each block is a surface portion of each block actually contacting a plane on which the tire is placed vertically when a regular load is applied under a state in which a tire is mounted on a regular rim and inflated to a regular internal pressure, and does not include, for example, a chamfered portion that does not actually contact the plane. Additionally, “ground contact edge” refers to both ends in the tire axial direction in this state. “Regular rim” is a rim defined by a standard for each tire according to a system of standards that includes standards on which tires are based, and refers to a “standard rim” in the case of JATMA (Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association, Inc.), refers to a “design rim” in the case of TRA (The Tire and Rim Association, Inc.), and refers to a “measuring rim” in the case of ETRTO (European Tire and Rim Technical Organization). “Regular internal pressure” is an air pressure defined by standards for each tire according to a system of standards that includes standards on which tires are based, and refers to a “maximum air pressure” in the case of JATMA, refers to the maximum value in the table of “TIRE ROAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES” in the case of TRA, and refers to the “INFLATION PRESSURE” in the case of ETRTO. “Regular internal pressure” is 180 kPa for a tire on a passenger vehicle. “Regular load” is a load defined by standards for each tire according to a system of standards that includes standards on which tires are based, and refers to “maximum load capacity” in the case of JATMA, refers to the maximum value in the table of “TIRE ROAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES” in the case of TRA, and refers to “LOAD CAPACITY” in the case of ETRTO. “Regular load” corresponds to 88% of the loads described above for a tire on a passenger vehicle.
Configurations of embodiments of the present technology will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As illustrated in
A carcass layer 4 is mounted between the left-right pair of bead portions 3. The carcass layer 4 includes a plurality of reinforcing cords extending in the tire radial direction, and is folded back around a bead core 5 arranged in each of the bead portions 3 from a vehicle inner side to a vehicle outer side. Additionally, bead fillers 6 are arranged on the periphery of the bead cores 5, and each bead filler 6 is enveloped by a main body portion and a folded back portion of the carcass layer 4. On the other hand, in the tread portion 1, a plurality of belt layers 7 (two layers in
The present technology may be applied to such a general pneumatic tire, however, the cross-sectional structure thereof is not limited to the basic structure described above.
As illustrated in
In the illustrated example, the block group 14 formed of the blocks 13 is present on a table-like platform 15, which is raised from a groove bottom of the lateral groove 12 and has a flat top surface. On the top surface, the blocks 13 and the longitudinal grooves 11 can be arranged. In this case, the longitudinal grooves 11 positioned between the blocks 13 forming each of the block groups 14 are also present on the platform 15. The groove bottoms of the longitudinal grooves 11 are flush with the top surface of the platform 15, or are positioned on the block road contact surface side with respect to the top surface of the platform 15. Each of the platforms 15 has a shape protruding toward both sides in the tire circumferential direction with respect to at least three blocks 13 forming each of the platforms 15, as viewed from the block road contact surface side. A contour line of each of the platforms 15 is bent along contour lines of at least three blocks 13 forming each of the platforms 15.
In addition, in the illustrated example, on a groove bottom of the longitudinal groove 11 adjacent to the shoulder block 13s, a raised bottom portion 16 raised from the groove bottom of the longitudinal groove 11 is provided. Further, the raised bottom portion 16 connects the shoulder block 13s and the middle block 13m.
The present technology relates to a notch portion 20 described later, which is provided to each of the blocks 13. Thus, as long as the blocks 13 adjacent to each other across the longitudinal grooves 11 are present, the shape of the entire tread pattern is not limited to the illustrated mode. Note that the tread pattern in
In the present technology, as illustrated in
The pair of notch portions 20 facing with each other across the longitudinal groove 11 are formed in the pair of blocks 13 adjacent to each other in the tire lateral direction as described above. Thus, when the pair of blocks 13 are deformed toward the longitudinal groove 11 side (the arrow directions in
In this case, when the notch portion 20 is provided in only one of the pair of blocks 13, the notch portions 20 do not face with each other, or the notch portion 20 does not have the above-mentioned shape, the notch portion 20 cannot compress mud or the like sufficiently. As a result, an effect of enhancing driving performance on unpaved roads is limited.
In addition to the above-mentioned notch portion 20, each of the blocks 13 may be provided with a sipe 21 that extends in the tire lateral direction and communicates with the notch portion 20. Alternatively, there may be provided a combined groove 23 formed of a shallow groove 22 that extends in the tire lateral direction and communicates with the notch portion 20 and a sipe that is formed in a groove bottom of the shallow groove 22, extends along the shallow groove 22, and communicates with the notch portion 20. Note that, in the present technology, “sipe” is a fine groove with a groove width of 1.5 mm or less, and “shallow groove” is a groove with a groove depth of 2 mm or less. Any of
As described above, the notch portion 20 in the present technology compresses mud or the like. In order to compress mud or the like more efficiently, a bottom portion 20a formed of a surface parallel with the road contact surface of the block 13 may be provided as illustrated in
In any of the cases described above, the notch width Wc of the notch portion 20 preferably falls within a range from 10% to 25% of a tire lateral direction length Wb of the block. By setting the notch width Wc as described above, the size of the notch portion 20 is optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner. When the notch width Wc is smaller than 10% of the tire lateral direction length Wb of the block, the notch portion 20 is excessively small, and hence an effect of enhancing driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) is limited. When the notch width Wc is larger than 25% of the tire lateral direction length Wb of the block, the notch portion 20 is excessively large, and hence block rigidity is degraded, which makes it difficult to maintain wear resistance.
Further, a portion of the notch portion 20, which has the largest notch depth Dc, is preferably positioned at 35% or greater, more preferably, a range from 36% to 53% of a maximum groove depth Dg of the longitudinal groove 11 from the groove bottom of the longitudinal groove 11. In other words, assuming that a height H is a distance from the groove bottom of the longitudinal groove 11 to the portion with the largest notch depth Dc, a ratio of the height H with respect to the maximum groove depth Dg of the longitudinal groove 11 is preferably 35% or greater, more preferably, falls within a range from 36% to 53%. With this, the notch depth Dc can be optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner. Note that, when the bottom portion 20a is present in the notch portion 20, the portion with the largest notch depth Dc corresponds to the bottom portion 20a. When the position of the portion with the largest notch depth Dc is present on the groove bottom side with respect to 35% of the maximum groove depth Dg of the longitudinal groove 11, the notch portion 20 is excessively large, and block rigidity is degraded, which makes it difficult to maintain wear resistance.
Moreover, the notch length Lc of the notch portion 20 preferably falls within a range from 40% to 75% of a tire circumferential direction length Lb of the block 13 provided with the notch portion 20. By setting the notch length Lc as described above, the size of the notch portion 20 is optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner. When the notch length Lc is smaller than 40% of the tire circumferential direction length Lb of the block 13, the notch portion 20 is excessively small, and an effect of enhancing driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) is limited. When the notch length Lc is larger than 75% of the tire circumferential direction length Lb of the block 13, the notch portion 20 is excessively large, and block rigidity is degraded, which makes it difficult to maintain wear resistance. Note that the notch length Lc is a distance in the tire lateral direction between both end points of the notch portion 20 in the tire circumferential direction on the road contact surface of the block 13.
In the present technology, as described above, the notch portion 20 compresses mud or the like. Thus, when the groove width of the longitudinal groove 11 is extremely large, it is difficult to compress mud or the like effectively. In view of this, the groove width of the longitudinal groove 11 between the notch portions 20 facing with each other is preferably set to fall within a range of from 7 mm to 13 mm. When the groove width of the longitudinal groove 11 is smaller than 7 mm, the groove volume is reduced, which may affect original driving performance. When the groove width of the longitudinal groove 11 is larger than 13 mm, the blocks 13 are away from each other. Thus, an effect of enhancing a shear force, which is exerted by the notch portion 20 compressing mud or the like, is limited. Note that the groove width of the longitudinal groove 11 is a distance along the tire lateral direction between a freely-selected point on one groove wall of the longitudinal groove 11 and an intersection point between the other groove wall and a straight line drawn from the freely-selected point along the tire lateral direction on the road contact surface of the block 13.
Further, in addition to the above-mentioned dimensions, a ratio of an area of the notch portion 20 on the road contact surface of the block 13 with respect to a projected area of the road contact surface of the block 13 preferably falls within a range from 3% to 16%. By providing the area of the notch portion 20 as described above, the size of the notch portion 20 is optimized, which is advantageous in achieving driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) and wear resistance in a well-balanced, compatible manner. When the ratio of the area of the notch portion 20 is less than 3%, the notch portion 20 is excessively small, and an effect of enhancing driving performance on unpaved roads (for example, mud performance) is limited. When the ratio of the area of the notch portion 20 is greater than 16%, the notch portion 20 is excessively large, and block rigidity is degraded, which makes it difficult to maintain wear resistance. Note that, as illustrated in
Twenty-five types of pneumatic tires in Conventional Example 1, Comparative Example 1, and Examples 1 to 23 were produced. Each of the pneumatic tires had a tire size of 35×12.50 R17, had a basic structure exemplified in
Note that Conventional Example 1 is an example without a notch portion, and is a mode in which the notch portion of each of the blocks was removed from the tread pattern in
The row “elements other than the notch portion” in each of Tables 1 to 3 shows a type of an element other than the notch portion, which was provided to each of the blocks. “Sipe” is a fine groove with a groove width of 1.5 mm or less, and “shallow groove” is a groove with a groove depth of 2 mm or less. “Combined groove” is a groove obtained by providing the sipe in the groove bottom of the shallow groove as in the examples in
Mud performance and wear resistance of those pneumatic tires were evaluated by the following evaluation methods. The results are also shown in Tables 1 to 3.
Mud Performance
The test tires were assembled on wheels with a rim size of 17×10.0 J, inflated to an air pressure of 240 kPa, and mounted on a test vehicle (four wheel drive vehicle). A test driver performed sensory evaluation on acceleration performance and escape performance on a mud road surface. Evaluation results are expressed as index values with Conventional Example 1 being assigned the index value of 100. Larger index values indicate superior mud performance. Note that the index value less than “102” is substantially equivalent to the conventional case (the case without a notch portion), and indicates that an effect of enhancing mud performance was not obtained. The index value of “107” or greater indicates particularly excellent mud performance.
Wear Resistance
The test tires were assembled on wheels with a rim size of 17×10.0 J, inflated to an air pressure of 240 kPa, and mounted on a test vehicle (four wheel drive vehicle). After driving on a paved road for 30000 km, the wear amount after the drive was measured. Evaluation results are expressed as index values with a multiplicative inverse of a measurement value of Conventional Example 1 being assigned the index value of 100. Larger index values indicate less wear amounts and superior wear resistance. Note that the index value of “95” or greater indicates that wear resistance at the level in the related art (equivalent to the case without a notch) was maintained. The index value of “97” or greater indicates that particularly satisfactory wear resistance was exerted.
As can be seen from Table 1, any of Examples 1 to 23 provided enhanced mud performance while maintaining wear resistance as compared to Conventional Example 1. Particularly, Examples 1 to 3, 8 to 9, 12 to 13, 16 to 17, and 20 to 22 provided such performance in a well-balanced manner to a high degree. Note that only the mud performance on muddy road surfaces was evaluated but that, even in a case where the vehicle travels on other unpaved roads (snowy roads, sandy ground, rocky areas, or the like), the tire according to the embodiment of the present technology provides the same functions for snow, sand, stone, rock, or the like on road surfaces as the functions for mud on muddy road surfaces, and thus favorably exhibits superior driving performance on unpaved roads and high damage resistance.
In contrast, in Comparative Example 1, the notch portions did not face with each other, and hence mud and the like could not be compressed sufficiently. Thus, an effect of enhancing mud performance could not be obtained.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2017-145126 | Jul 2017 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2018/027875 | 7/25/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/022129 | 1/31/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5031680 | Kajikawa et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
6408911 | Tanabe | Jun 2002 | B1 |
20040238092 | Colombo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20120241061 | Maehara | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130206294 | Akashi | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130263988 | Minoli | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140041778 | Rubber | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20170015143 | Nagase | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170066290 | Fujioka | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20190118581 | Suzuki | Apr 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102689568 | Sep 2012 | CN |
1213160 | Jun 2002 | EP |
H02-053608 | Feb 1990 | JP |
H07-164827 | Jun 1995 | JP |
2001-277815 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2004-098943 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005-193702 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2007-331656 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2009-006870 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-220779 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009-286276 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2011-068316 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2012-076597 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2013-035346 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2014-034334 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2015134578 | Jul 2015 | JP |
WO 03013881 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2012053559 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
JP 2009006870 Machine Translation; Itakura, Keisuke (Year: 2009). |
JP 2015134578 Machine Translation; Ichiyanagi, Yutaka (Year: 2015). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2018/027875 dated Oct. 30, 2018, 4 pages, Japan. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210086563 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |