Pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6286469
  • Patent Number
    6,286,469
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 24, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 11, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A two-stroke internal combustion engine having a compressed air assisted fuel injection system. The injection system has an accumulator that uses scavenged air from the crankcase as the compressed air source. The injection system has a valve connected to an exit from the accumulator. The valve is connected to a diaphragm with two diaphragm pressure chambers on opposite sides of the diaphragm. Both diaphragm pressure chambers are connected to pressure in the crankcase; one of the diaphragm pressure chambers by a flow restrictor.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to fuel injection systems for internal combustion engines and, more specifically, to a pneumatically controlled system for a two-stroke engine.




2. Prior Art




IAPAC direct fuel injection systems which use a cam to control introduction of scavenged compressed air from a crankcase have been used in the past to reduce pollutant emissions and fuel consumption in two-stroke engines. European Patent Office patent publication No. EP 0789138 discloses a camless IAPAC system (now known as SCIP) which uses a diaphragm connected to a valve, a spring, pressure from the engine crankcase, and pressure from combustion expansion gases in the combustion chamber to delay movement of the valve.




A problem exists with the cam driven IAPAC system in that added components increase cost to the engine. A problem exists with the SCIP system in that misfires in the combustion chamber result in no combustion expansion gases to delay movement of the valve. Misfires in a two-stroke engine can happen as often as one out of every three piston cycles. Thus, injection of fuel and air into the combustion chamber using a SCIP system can result in a substantial number of premature injections; about one-third of the time.




Several alternatives for the pressurized air utilized in the injection are known; a separate air pump may be utilized, the air source may be derived from the cylinder of the engine during the compression or the expansion stroke, or the air may be derived from the crankcase pumping of the engine. In low cost applications it is desired to utilize the air source from the crankcase or the cylinder, so as to avoid the added cost and complexity of the separate air pump. In the application of pneumatic injection to larger cylinder sized engines, in general larger than 50 cc displacement, it is generally desirable to utilize injection pressure derived from the cylinder pressure because a high gas pressure may be obtained for injection. In smaller engines this tapping utilizes a disproportionate quantity of the cylinder charge gases and, thus, adversely affects the performance of the engine. It is therefore more practical to utilize the crankcase pumping source in such cases.




It is most beneficial to inject the fuel into the cylinder near to or slightly after the bottom dead center position of the piston. This injection timing avoids introducing the fuel into the early phase of the cylinder scavenging, and thus avoiding short circuit loss to the exhaust. Further, the fuel is introduced into the cylinder when the pressure in the cylinder in near atmospheric pressure, allowing the best use of the limited injection pressure to spray and therefore atomize the fuel charge. Thus, it is desirable to have a pneumatic injection timing near to the bottom dead center timing of the piston and that this timing be relatively constant with changing engine operational parameters such as speed and throttle position or load.




Several methods for operating an injection valve are taught in the prior art. U.S. Pat. No. 4,693,224 teaches the use of an electronic solenoid to operate the injection valve. This is generally unacceptable for application to small high speed engines because of the necessity of an engine control unit to operate the valve and the relatively high power requirement to drive the high speed solenoid, both adding prohibitive costs to the engine. The most common method of operating the valve as taught by the prior art is the use of some form of kinematic valve linkage driven from the crank shaft of the engine. These valves take the form of oscillating valves driven by cams as taught by a system called “PROJECT” described in an article “Pro-Ject Air-Assisted Fuel Injection System For Two-Stroke Engines”, SAE 940397 from Universita di Pisa and a system from L'Institut Francais du Petrole described in an article “A New Two-Stroke Engine With Compressed Air Assisted Fuel Injection For High Efficiency Low Emissions Applications” by Duret et al. in SAE 880176, or rotating type valves as taught by Honda in an article “An Experimental Study of Stratified Scavenging Activated Radical Combustion Engine” by Ishibashi, SAE 972077. A problem exists with all the forms of kinematically driven valves in that they need precision surfaces and high quality materials for both the sealing members of the valve and the running portions of the drive. Valves mounted such that they are exposed to combustion gases must also be fashioned from expensive heat resistant materials. Additionally, many parts require lubrication which is not presently available in the simple two-stroke engine. Thus, the mechanical type valve arrangements add significant costs and complexity to the construction of the engine. Therefore, it is desirable to fashion an injection control valve that may be made of inexpensive materials and need not be manufactured to high tolerance, the valve and drive mechanism most preferably would require no high temperature capability or additional lubrication.




Further, an additional problem is commonly known to exist in the application of oscillating valves to high speed engines. The problem is that of the greatly increasing drive force required as the engine speed increases. For a fixed valve opening amplitude or lift, the acceleration required of the valve increases in proportion to the square of the valve opening frequency and therefore the engine speed. Further, the force required to drive the valve increases in proportion to the acceleration. Thus, the force required to drive the valve increases in proportion to the square of the engine speed. For single acting valve trains, that is valves actively driven in only one direction, these high drive forces lead to the use of large return springs to over come the valve inertial forces and prevent valve float, and consequently even more elevated drive forces. It is desirable to drive the valve in both directions, both open and closed, to avoid the use of large spring members and the associated high forces, while still attaining high speed operation. Mechanical means can be applied to drive the valve in both directions, however, this requires an even higher degree of precision and leads to even greater cost and complexity of the engine.




The final method of driving the injection valve is to operate the valve pneumatically. Pneumatic operation is affected by driving a piston through the use of a differential gas pressure across the two opposing faces of the piston. This piston in turn drives the valve. The use of pneumatic operation is common practice in gas flow control, in such devices as flow regulators and flow control valves such as spool valves. In engine operation pneumatically controlled valves are commonly utilized in carburetor operation for flow control, regulation of pressures and various operations such as driving liquid injections and opening addition flow paths. Examples of such use are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,377,637; 5,353,754; 5,197,417; 5,197,418; 4,846,119 and 4,813,391. In their application to engines where limited motion is required the piston is often in the form of a diaphragm, acting as the piston seal, and diaphragm plates functioning as the drive piston.




The use of pneumatic valve operation for control of a pneumatic injection system is taught in WO 96/07817 and EP 0789138A1. These systems utilize an injection valve placed in the head of the combustion chamber and operated on by pressures derived from various locations of the engine to influence the valve mi motion.




WO 96/07817 teaches a pneumatic valve that is opened when the injection pressure as derived from the crankcase of the engine overcomes the pressure from the valve closing spring and a delayed pressure wave derived from the crankcase. A problem exists in such a system that the injection pressure as derived from the crankcase is highly dependent on the engine operating condition. The peak pressure attained by the crankcase in a small two stroke engine varies with the throttle position. At wide open throttle (WOT) the peak pressure may reach 6 to 7 pounds per square inch above atmospheric pressure (psig), while at low throttle opening the peak pressure only reaches 1.5 to 2 psig. Thus the injection pressure available to open the valve is highly dependent on operating condition and thus, the injection timing is dependent on operating conditions. Further, in a small high speed engine the area of the valve is severely limited by the available space in the engine. This small area and the relatively low injection pressure available to act on that area lead to a small available force for valve opening. This coupled with the previously mention phenomenon of the required high force at high speed severely limit the use in the small high speed application. Thus it is desirable to have a valve actuation system that is largely independent of injection pressure, further it is desired that the primary motive force be derived from the diaphragm or drive piston such that the valve operation is largely independent of valve area.




A further problem exists with WO 96/07817. The wave used to control the injection is derived from the crankcase pressure through a long ‘delay’ line. The delay line is used to control the time of arrival of the pressure wave at the valve. The transit time in seconds of the pressure wave is fairly constant, however the transit and arrival timing in terms of crankshaft position, and therefore piston position, is highly dependent on engine speed. Thus, the injection timing is highly dependent on engine speed. Further the delay line also acts to attenuate the pressure wave, this attenuation is more acute with increasing engine speed. The attenuation coupled with the relatively weak crankcase wave render an inadequate control pressure in high speed/high load operation. It is desired to fashion a valve control system that is largely independent of engine speed.




Other embodiments of the art teach the use of controlling crank ‘cheeks’ and additional delay lines to further control the pressure waves. These controlling cheeks must be made as precision valve surfaces to control the small flows associated with the valve control and thus add significant cost to the engine. The additional delay lines impart further speed dependence on the injection timing.




These deficiencies in WO 96/07817 are also pointed out in EP 0789138A1. EP 0789139A1 teaches the use of a valve as in the previous patent where the wave utilized to delay the injection is derived from the cylinder expansion gases. The expansion wave is again delivered to the valve control diaphragm through a delay line. In some embodiments the opening force available is enhanced by the use of longer delay lines from either the cylinder expansion gases or the crankcase wave and is delivered to the opposite side of the actuating diaphragm. Although this embodiment does enhance the opening force and improve on the problem of low pressure of the crankcase wave, the deficiency of the injection timing being highly dependent on engine speed is further introduced. Thus the injection behavior may only be optimized for a specific engine speed.




A further and critical problem is introduced through the use of the expansion gases to control the valve motion. Small two-stroke engines mostly exhibit poor combustion characteristics with misfire or partial combustion occurring every couple of strokes. During misfire there are no combustion expansion gases to be utilized to delay the injection. Further, due to ring seal leakage, the pressure during the late stages of the normal expansion stroke after misfire is often sub-atmospheric, thus further advancing the injection timing. Therefore, as often as every third stroke the injection occurs at, or before, the beginning of the fresh air scavenging of the cylinder, thereby short circuiting both the unburned charge from the misfired stroke and a large portion of the early injected charge for the following stroke. It is therefore desirable to fashion an injection control system that is largely independent of combustion expansion gases from combustion of an individual piston cycle.




In both of the aforementioned publications the primary motive force for the closure of the valve is a spring positioned in the diaphragm chamber. This spring must be of sufficiently low force to allow the valve to be opened by the low injection pressures or diaphragm drive forces available. This low force combined with the increasing inertial forces of the valve at high speed lead to later and later valve closure and eventually valve float. Again it is desirable to fashion a double acting valve drive system that drives the valve both open and closed in a positive way.




A normal feature of small two-stroke engines is the lack of a separate lubrication system. The lubricant is commonly delivered to the crankcase components and the piston-cylinder unit through being mixed with the fuel. In direct injected engines, including pneumatically injected engine, of the prior art the fuel with no lubricant is delivered to the combustion chamber. This requires the addition of a separate lubrication supply pump and system for the crankcase and piston-cylinder unit, thus adding cost and complexity to the engine. It is therefore desirable to have the injection system supply a limited but significant quantity of fuel oil mixture to the crankcase to meet the engine lubrication requirement with limited additional complexity or cost.




It is an object of the present invention to have a double acting valve that is positively driven towards both the open and closed position.




It is an object of the present invention to have a valve that operates largely independently of injection pressure.




It is an object of the present invention to have a valve timing that is largely independent of operational conditions of the engine, specifically speed influences and throttle position/load influences.




It is an object of the present invention to provide a valve that is predominantly open, thereby providing lubrication without additional systems.




It is an object of the present invention to fashion a valve and drive that does not require the use of high temperature capable materials.




It is an object of the present invention to fashion a valve and drive that may be manufactured by presently utilized techniques and materials of the mass production industry.




It is an object of the present invention to provide a valve not requiring precision ground sealing surfaces.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention an internal combustion engine is provided comprising a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system. The injection system has a valve connected to a diaphragm. Two diaphragm chambers are located on opposite sides of the diaphragm. Both of the diaphragm chambers are connected to pressure from a crankcase of the engine. A second one of the diaphragm chambers is connected to the crankcase pressure through a flow restrictor. Pressure in the second diaphragm chamber is thus an attenuated averaged pressure relative to the crankcase pressure.




In accordance with one method of the present invention, a method of determining timing of movement of a valve in a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system for an internal combustion engine is provided. The method comprises steps of sensing pressure inside a crankcase of the engine; determining when crankcase blowdown has substantially completed based upon the sensed pressure inside the crankcase; and allowing movement of the valve to an open position only after substantial completion of crankcase blowdown has been determined.




In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a two-stroke internal combustion engine is provided comprising a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system. The injection system has a source of compressed air and a valve connected to an exit from the source of compressed air. The injection system further comprises means for maintaining the valve in an open position during a rotation of a crankshaft of the engine of about 270° to about 220°.




In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention a two-stroke internal combustion engine is provided comprising an engine displacement size of between about 16 cc to about 38 cc, a low pressure fuel metering system, and a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system connecting the fuel metering system to a cylinder of the engine. The injection system is adapted to inject air and fuel at a timing such that operating hydrocarbon emissions from the engine are less than 50 gm/bhp*hr.




In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention an internal combustion engine is provided comprising a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system. The injection system has a valve connected to a diaphragm across a first diaphragm pressure chamber. The first diaphragm pressure chamber is in communication with a crankcase of the engine such that crankcase pressure is provided to the diaphragm pressure chamber. Pressure in the diaphragm pressure chamber both pushes on the diaphragm to locate the valve at a closed position and pulls on the diaphragm to locate the valve at an open position as crankcase pressure varies.




In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention an internal combustion engine is provided having a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system. The injection system has a valve connected to a diaphragm and two diaphragm chambers on opposite sides of the diaphragm. The diaphragm chambers are connected to at least one location of the engine that generates varying gas pressures substantially separate and independent of combustion expansion gases from combustion in an individual piston cycle.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing aspects and other features of the invention are explained in the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of an internal combustion engine incorporating features of the present invention;





FIG. 1A

is a partial schematic view of an alternate embodiment of the engine shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 2

is a diagram illustrating valve position and fuel inlet piston porting relative to piston location based upon crankshaft rotation;





FIG. 3A

is a graph of pressures in the two diaphragm pressure chambers shown in

FIG. 1

at a first engine speed at wide open throttle;





FIG. 3B

is a graph of pressure in the accumulator shown in

FIG. 1

at the first engine speed at wide open throttle;





FIG. 4A

is a graph of pressures in the two diaphragm pressure chambers as in

FIG. 3A

at a closed throttle;





FIG. 4B

is a graph of pressure in the accumulator as in

FIG. 3B

at a closed throttle;





FIG. 5A

is a graph of pressures in the two diaphragm pressure chambers shown in

FIG. 1

at a second higher engine speed at wide open throttle;





FIG. 5B

is a graph of pressure in the accumulator shown in

FIG. 1

at the second higher engine speed at wide open throttle;





FIG. 6A

is a cross-sectional view of a first unit of a fuel injection system incorporating features of the present invention;





FIG. 6B

is a cross-sectional view of the first unit shown in

FIG. 6A

taken along line


6


B—


6


B;





FIG. 6C

is a cross-sectional view of the first unit shown in

FIG. 6A

shown attached to a crankcase piece of the engine;





FIG. 7A

is a cross-sectional view of a second unit of a fuel injection system, attached to a cylinder, for use with the first unit shown in

FIGS. 6A and 6B

;





FIG. 7B

is a cross-sectional view of the second unit shown in

FIG. 7A

taken along line


7


B—


7


B;





FIG. 7C

is a front elevation view of the second unit shown in

FIG. 7A

;





FIG. 8

is a partial schematic view of an alternate embodiment of an internal combustion engine incorporating features of the present invention;





FIG. 9

is a partial schematic view of another alternate embodiment of an internal combustion engine incorporating features of the present invention;





FIG. 10

is a diagram illustrating valve position and fuel inlet piston porting relative to piston location based upon crankshaft rotation for the engine shown in

FIG. 9

;





FIG. 11A

is a graph of pressures in the two diaphragm pressure chambers shown in

FIG. 9

at the first speed and wide open throttle;





FIG. 11B

is a graph of pressure in the accumulator shown in

FIG. 9

at the first speed and wide open throttle;





FIG. 12

is a schematic flow control diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention with cylinder charging;





FIG. 13

is a schematic flow control diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention with crankcase charging;





FIG. 14

is a schematic flow control diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention with cylinder charging on the compression stroke of the piston;





FIG. 15

is a schematic flow control diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention with cylinder charging on the expansion stroke of the piston;





FIG. 16

is a schematic flow control diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention with an expansion closer system to close the injection valve earlier;





FIG. 17

is a schematic flow control diagram of a system as in

FIG. 13

with a spool valve;





FIG. 18

is a schematic flow control diagram of a system as in

FIG. 13

with a poppet valve;





FIG. 19

is a graph of crankcase pressure and average crankcase pressure for a full cycle of a piston;





FIG. 20

is a graph as in

FIG. 19

showing effects of opening bias and closing bias on valve movement timing;





FIGS. 21A

,


21


B, and


21


C are graphs as in

FIG. 19

for a system with read valve induction at idle throttle, half throttle and wide open throttle positions, respectively; and





FIGS. 22A

,


22


B and


22


C are graphs as in

FIG. 19

for a system with piston port induction at idle throttle, half throttle and wide open throttle positions, respectively.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring to

FIG. 1

, there is shown a schematic view of an internal combustion engine


10


incorporating features of the present invention. Although the present invention will be described with reference to the embodiments shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present invention can be embodied in many alternate forms of embodiments. In addition, any suitable size, shape or type of elements or materials could be used.




The engine


10


is a two-stroke engine having a cylinder


12


, a piston


14


, a crankshaft


16


, a crankcase


18


, a fuel metering system


20


, and a fuel injection system


22


. The present invention relates to the control of a low pressure pneumatic injection of an internal combustion engine. A particular field of application of the invention is a two-stroke internal combustion engine. The specific application described is to a small high speed two-stroke engine, such as utilized in handheld power equipment such as leaf blowers, string trimmers and hedge trimmers, also in wheeled vehicle applications such as mopeds, motorcycles and scooters and in small outboard boat engines. The small two stroke engine has many desirable characteristics, that lend themselves to the above applications, including: simplicity of construction, low cost of manufacture, high power-to-weight ratios, high speed operational capability and, in many parts of the world, ease of maintenance with simple facilities.




The prominent draw back of the simple two-stroke engine is the loss of a portion of the fresh unburned fuel charge from the cylinder during the scavenging process. This leads to poor fuel economy and, most importantly, high emission of unburned hydrocarbon, thus rendering the simple two-stroke engine incapable of compliance with increasingly stringent governmental pollution restrictions. This draw back is typically relieved by separating the scavenging of the cylinder, with fresh air, from the charging of the cylinder, with fuel. This separation can be achieved by injecting the liquid fuel into the cylinder or more preferably by pneumatically injecting the fuel charge by utilizing a pressurized air source, separate from the fresh air scavenge, to spray the fuel into the cylinder. In a preferred embodiment the displacement size of the engine is about 16 cc to about 100 cc, but could be larger or smaller. These sizes of engines are used for such things as string trimmers, chain saws, leaf blowers, and other hand held power tools. The engine could also be used on a tool such as a lawn mower, snow blower or motor boat outboard engine. The cylinder


12


has a spark plug (not shown) connected to its top, a bottom connected to the crankcase


18


, an air inlet


24


, a combustion chamber


26


, an exhaust outlet


28


, and a fuel inlet


30


into the combustion chamber. The fuel metering system


20


could be any suitable type of system, such as a carburator or electronic fuel injector. However, an advantage of the present system is that there is no need for high precision timing or spray quality for the fuel metering system. A relatively simple metering system that delivers drops of fuel could be used. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1A

the fuel inlet


30


is open; i.e.: with no flow check valve into the combustion chamber


26


. However, an alternate embodiment is shown in

FIG. 1A

which has a flow check valve at its fuel inlet. In this alternate embodiment the fuel inlet


31


has a reed valve


32


that functions as the check valve, but any suitable check valve could be used. The inlet


31


is located in a side wall of the cylinder


12


and is shaped to input fuel and air in an upward direction towards the top of the cylinder head. However, in alternate embodiments the inlet could be located in the top of the cylinder head or be shaped to direct fuel towards the top of the piston


14


.




Referring back to

FIG. 1

, the fuel injection system


22


is a compressed air assisted system. The injection system


22


comprises an accumulator


34


, a diaphragm and valve assembly


36


, and a housing


37


. The accumulator


34


, in this embodiment, has an inlet


38


connected to pressure inside the crankcase


18


and an exit


40


. The accumulator


34


functions as a collector and temporary storage area for compressed air. In this embodiment the source of the compressed air is air scavenged from the crankcase


18


. The piston


14


compresses the air in the crankcase


18


on the piston's downward stroke. A reed valve


39


is provided at the inlet


38


to allow scavenged air to flow in only one direction through the inlet. However, any suitable flow check valve could be used. The diaphragm and valve assembly


36


comprises a valve


42


and a diaphragm


44


. The valve


42


has a valve head


46


that is longitudinally movable to open and close the accumulator exit


40


. The diaphragm


44


has the valve


42


connected thereto and establishes two diaphragm pressure chambers


48


,


50


formed in the housing


37


on opposite sides of the diaphragm


44


. Conduits or channels


52


,


54


lead through the housing


37


from the crankcase


18


to the chambers


48


,


50


. A flow restrictor


56


is provided in the channel


54


to the outer chamber


50


. In a preferred embodiment the restrictor


56


merely comprises a narrowed hole. However, any suitable type of flow restrictor to delay flow of air therethrough could be provided. The valve


42


extends from the diaphragm


44


across the inner chamber


48


to the accumulator exit


40


. A spring


58


is provided in the outer chamber


50


to bias the diaphragm towards the inner chamber


48


. Because the valve


42


is connected to the diaphragm


44


, this biases the valve


42


towards an open position with the valve head


46


in an open spaced position at the exit


40


. In an alternate embodiment the spring could be located in the inner chamber


48


. In another embodiment no spring need be provided. A channel


60


extends from the exit


40


to the fuel inlet


30


. The fuel metering system


20


is connected to the channel


60


to insert fuel into the channel


60


which is subsequently mixed with a pressure pulse of air from the accumulator


34


and injected into the combustion chamber


26


through the inlet


30


.




Referring also to

FIG. 2

, opening and closing of the valve


42


relative to other events during a single full piston cycle (which results from a 360° rotation of the crankshaft


16


) will be described.

FIG. 2

is intended to illustrate the line of events as a 360° chart corresponding to piston location as based upon angular position of the crankshaft


16


starting at top dead center (TDC) position of the piston


14


. At TDC the valve inlet


30


is blocked by the side of the piston head. Area A indicates when the piston head blocks the inlet


30


. The piston head uncovers the inlet


30


at about 45° of rotation of the crankshaft after TDC (ATDC). Shortly after this the air inlet


24


is closed by the piston head at point IC. Area B indicates when the valve


42


is moved to a closed position by the diaphragm


44


in an engine at 3200 RPM at wide open throttle (WOT). From TDC to about 90° after TDC the valve


42


is at an open position. The valve


42


is moved to its closed position by pressure of gases in the crankcase


18


. The valve


42


is kept closed until about 10° after bottom dead center (BDC). The valve


42


then remains in its open position as the piston moves back up to TDC. At about 45° before TDC (BTDC) the head of the piston


14


closes the inlet


30


again as indicated by H in area A. EO indicates when the head of the piston


14


moves down enough to open the combustion chamber to the exhaust outlet


28


. TO indicate when the head of the piston moves down enough to open access from the combustion chamber to the transfer channel


27


. TC indicates when the transfer channel


27


is closed by the head of the piston as the piston head moves back up. EC indicates when the exhaust outlet


28


is closed by the head of the piston. IO indicates when the air intake


24


is opened to the crankcase as the head of the piston moves towards TDC. With this embodiment the valve


42


is located at its open position for about 260° of rotation of the crankshaft. The valve


42


is located at its closed position for about 100° of rotation of the crankshaft; between about 90° after TDC to about 10° after BDC. Area B′ shows the closed position for the valve


42


at an idle position of the engine if the pressure in chamber


50


was not provided. The valve


42


closes at about 115° after TDC and opens again at about 165° after TDC. Area C shows the closed position for the valve


42


when the fuel inlet has a check valve as indicated by the reed valve


39


at induction inlet


38


. Area B shows the closed position of the valve


42


for an embodiment without the reed value


39


. Preferably, the system is adapted to keep the valve in its open position during a period of time corresponding to about 220° to about 270° of rotation of the crankshaft.




Referring also to

FIG. 3A

, the pressures inside the two diaphragm pressure chambers


48


,


50


will be discussed for a wide open throttle (WOT) at 3200 RPM relative to crank angle after TDC. These sample pressures were taken for a system as illustrated in

FIG. 1

without the reed valve


32


; i.e.: the piston ported embodiment with the valve closure as indicated by area B in FIG.


2


. Line D illustrates the pressure in chamber


48


. Line E illustrates the pressure in chamber


50


. The pressure D in the inner chamber


48


is substantially the same as the pressure inside the crankcase


18


. The left side of the chart is gage pressure measured in pounds per square inch (psi) and 0 (zero) in the chart represents atmospheric pressure. The pressure D varies between about 3 psi above and below atmospheric pressure. The pressure E varies between about 1 psi above and below atmospheric pressure. The flow restrictor is sized and shaped to provide the pressure E with a minimum attenuation of about one-third of the crankcase pressure. However, other ratios could be provided. The pressure in the crankcase


18


changes based upon opening and closing of the air inlet


24


by the head of the piston


14


and by the head of the piston compressing the air inside the crankcase


18


on its downward stroke. As seen in

FIG. 3A

, when the air inlet


24


is closed by the head of the piston


14


at IC (about 50° ATDC) pressure D in the inner chamber


48


increases. At about 130° ATDC the transfer channel


27


opens (TO). Thus, pressure in the crankcase and pressure D drops to atmospheric pressure until the transfer channel


27


closes again (TC) at about 240° ATDC. Pressure in the crankcase and pressure D then drops below atmospheric pressure, because of vacuum created by the upward movement of the piston head, until the air intake


24


opens (IO). Pressure in the crankcase and pressure D then rises.




Pressure E in the outer diaphragm pressure chamber


50


, even though also in communication with pressure from the crankcase


18


, is very different from the pressure D. As noted above, outer chamber


50


is connected to pressure from the crankcase


18


by the flow restrictor


56


. The flow restrictor functions to attenuate and phase shift pressure D and average it to provide a more uniform pressure. Thus, where pressure D can fluctuate greatly between TO and IO, the pressure E varies much less. However, pressure E still varies based upon crankcase pressure. Crankcase pressure can vary based upon atmospheric pressure variations, speed of the engine (RPMs), and throttle position.

FIGS. 4A and 4B

show the pressures D and E and the accumulator pressure for 3200 RPM at a closed throttle.

FIGS. 5A and 5B

show the pressures D and E and the accumulator pressure for 7500 RPM at a wide open throttle. Pressure E is thus dynamically variable as an attenuated, phase shifted, average of the crankcase pressure. These two pressures D, E, which are both driven and formed by crankcase pressure, determine when the valve


42


should be moved between open and closed positions and drive the valve's movement. The timing of the valve's movement to an open position is preferably based upon when crankcase blowdown is completed. More specifically, the injection system preferably allows the valve to move from a closed position to an open position only upon a sensed crankcase pressure indicating a substantial completion or full completion of crankcase blowdown. In an alternate embodiment an electronic sensor could sense pressure inside the crankcase and, when crankcase blowdown had been determined by this sensed pressure, the valve would then be allowed to move to its open position; after substantial or full completion of crankcase blowdown had been determined. Crankcase blowdown is completed at about BDC when the piston stops its downward movement which stops the pushing of air out of the crankcase


18


by the piston


14


. Thus, the fuel injection system


22


opens the valve


42


at point G close to when crankcase blowdown is completed. By basing operation of the fuel injection system upon completion of crankcase blowdown, timing of the valve opening and closing does not change significantly at speed variations.




Referring back to

FIGS. 1

,


2


,


3


A and


3


B, at TDC (0°) the two pressures are about the same. However, because the spring


58


has been provided, the valve


42


would be biased at its open position. At point F (about 90° after TDC) the pressure in the inner chamber


48


is sufficiently greater than the pressure in the outer chamber


50


to overcome the spring


58


and move the diaphragm rearward. This moves the valve


42


to seat the head


46


in the accumulation exit


40


and thereby close the exit


40


.

FIG. 3B

is a graph of corresponding pressure in the accumulator


34


measured in pounds per square inch (psi) above atmospheric pressure (i.e.: 0 (zero) in the left hand side of the chart represents atmospheric pressure). Pressure in the accumulator


34


in this piston ported system is greatest at area A between points H and I shown in

FIG. 2

(between about 45° BTDC-45° ATDC) because compressed gases from the piston moving upward towards TDC exert pressure through the open inlet


30


and into the accumulator. The open inlet


30


is then piston ported to a closed position as the head of the piston


14


covers the inlet


30


. Thus, the pressure in the accumulator


34


remains substantially the same between about 45° BTDC and about 45° ATDC. The pressure in the accumulator


34


drops when fuel inlet


30


is opened at 45° ATDC until point F at about 90° ATDC. At F the valve


42


is closed by pressure differences in the chambers


48


,


50


as indicated above. Pressure in the accumulator


34


then remains about the same until point G at about 190° ATDC. Point G is when the crankcase pressure and pressure in chamber


48


decreases sufficiently relative to the pressure in outer chamber


50


to allow the valve


42


to move back to its normally open position. With the valve


42


now in its open position the pressurized air in the accumulator


34


can travel out the fuel inlet


30


into the combustion chamber


26


taking with it fuel received from the fuel metering system


20


. At EC (exhaust


28


closed) the accumulator pressure stops falling and starts to increase due to compression of air in the combustion chamber


36


by upward movement of the head of the piston


14


. This stops at point H when the head of the piston once again closes the fuel inlet


30


. Points F and G can be adjusted by selecting different force springs for the spring


58


and/or changing the size of the restrictor


56


.




As noted above, the fuel inlet


30


is located in the side wall of the cylinder


12


. The fuel for a two-stroke engine comprises a fuel, such as gasoline, and a lubricant (oil). The longitudinal location or height of the inlet on the side wall has been selected to provide certain benefits. Proper location of the inlet


30


can allow for the advantage of eliminating the need for a separate lubrication system for the crankshaft and piston assembly in a system which nonetheless delivers the fuel to the combustion chamber above the piston without the fuel first going through the crankcase. In old style two-stroke systems fuel was passed through the crankcase so that oil in the fuel could lubricate the parts in the crankcase. Alternatively, a separate lubrication system would be needed. The present system uses the features of keeping the valve


42


in an open position while the piston


14


moves between just after an air inlet open position (IO) to top dead center (TDC) to provide lubrication for the parts in the crankcase and the piston. As the piston head passes the inlet


30


during this period, oil in the fuel from the outlet is sucked onto the side of the piston head and is transported by the piston head into the crankcase. Thus, unlike the old two-stroke system in which all the fuel passed through the crankcase, in the present system only a small amount of the fuel gets into the crankcase


18


. However, this small amount nonetheless provides adequate lubrication. Apart from the cost savings from the fact that no separate lubrication system is needed, the present invention provides two other advantages. First, tolerances for the piston/cylinder fit can relaxed, but nonetheless not increase hydrocarbon emissions when compared to the old style fuel-through-crankcase system. In the old system, in order to meet governmental regulatory agency hydrocarbon emission standards, tolerances for piston/cylinder fit needed to be very fine in order to minimize or prevent fuel from seeping between the piston and cylinder during the downstroke of the piston (when the crankcase was being pressurized by the downstroke of the piston). However, with the present system, because fuel is not primarily being channeled through the crankcase


18


, seeping of fuel between the piston and cylinder from the crankcase


18


is no longer a substantial factor on hydrocarbon emissions. Thus, piston/cylinder fit tolerances can be less precise. Manufacturing using larger tolerances results in a less expensive piston and cylinder manufacturing process. The second other advantage is reduced hydrocarbon emissions. Even with larger piston/cylinder fit tolerances, because fuel is not primarily being channeled through the crankcase


18


, hydrocarbons do not substantially seep from the crankcase directly to the combustion chamber while the crankcase is being pressurized from the piston downstroke. The relatively small fuel that is transported from the inlet


30


to the side of the piston head and into the crankcase provides a relatively small hydrocarbon emissions problem.




Referring now to

FIGS. 6A and 6B

, a cross-sectional view of a first unit


70


of a specific embodiment of the general fuel injection system of

FIG. 1

is shown. The first unit


70


is intended to be used with a second unit


72


of the system which is shown in

FIGS. 7A and 7B

. The first unit


70


generally comprises a housing


74


and a diaphragm and valve assembly


76


. The housing


74


has three housing pieces


78


,


79


,


80


comprised of molded plastic. A first section


82


of the housing


74


has the inlet


38


. Referring also to

FIG. 6C

, the first section


82


has an exterior shape that is sized and shaped to form part of the crankcase for the engine. More specifically, the engine has a crankcase piece


86


with end wall having an opening


88


. In this engine the crankshaft


16


is a half-crank type crankshaft similar to that shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,333,580 where the crankweight


90


is only on one side of the piston push rod


92


. The shaft


94


of the crankshaft


16


is rotatably supported on the crankcase piece


86


by a bearing


96


. The first section


82


fits inside the opening


88


to thereby seal off the opening. Thus, this eliminates the need for a separate end cap that was used in the opening in the prior art. The inlet


38


of the first unit housing


74


is, thus, located at the chamber formed by the crankcase


18


. The housing need not function as part of the crankcase as an end cap, such as when the engine is a full crankweight engine having crankweights on both sides of the piston push rod.




The housing


74


forms the accumulator


34


, the conduit


52


, exit


40


from the accumulator, and, in combination with the diaphragm


102


, the two diaphragm chambers


48


,


50


. The housing


74


has a channel


98


from the exit


40


to a tube mount exit


100


from the housing


74


. The diaphragm


102


in this embodiment has a hole


104


therethrough that connects the two chambers


48


,


50


to each other. The hole


104


functions as the flow restrictor


56


thereby eliminating the need for the channel


54


. The valve


106


is preferably made of a lightweight material such as plastic with an O-ring seal


108


. By using a lightweight material for the valve


106


, valve float at high speed engine operation, such as 9000 RPM-15000 RPM, can be eliminated. Valve float is a condition that occurs when the weight or mass of the valve has an inertia that does not allow the valve to move fast enough to correspond to pressures in the diaphragm chambers. Thus, at such a high speed, a relatively heavy valve would remain in an open position (biased by the spring


58


) and not close when it was designed to close. By making the valve


106


from a lightweight material, such as molded plastic, valve float can be eliminated. One of the reasons why molded plastic can be used is because the first unit


70


is connected to the crankcase


18


away from the cylinder


12


. The cylinder


12


gets hot during engine operation. If the first unit


70


was connected to the cylinder, heat from the cylinder could melt the plastic valve


106


. Thus, spacing the first unit


70


away from the cylinder


12


allows the valve


106


to be manufactured from lightweight plastic without risk of the valve melting and, without having to use a heavier material with a higher melting point that could cause valve float. The valve and the diaphragm can both be made of less expensive material than more expensive high temperature tolerant materials.




Referring now to

FIGS. 7A-7C

, the second unit


72


is shown. The second unit


72


is preferably made of metal pieces and is attached directly to the side wall


110


of the cylinder


12


. In this embodiment the second unit


72


has a reed valve


32


as in the embodiment shown in FIG.


1


A. The second unit


72


has a first frame piece


112


and a second frame piece


114


. A scavenged air tube


116


(see

FIG. 7C

) extends between the tube mount exit


100


of the first unit housing


74


(see

FIG. 6B

) to the second frame piece


114


. The tube


116


functions as the conduit


60


shown in

FIG. 1A. A

fuel supply tube


118


extends from the fuel metering device to the second frame piece


114


. The second frame piece


114


has mounting holes (not shown), air inlet hole


120


, and air pulse hole


122


. The first frame piece


112


also has mounting holes (not shown), a first section


124


, and a second section


126


. The second section


126


has an air inlet hole


128


and a pulse hole


130


. The side wall


110


of the cylinder


12


has an air inlet hole


132


, a positioning and fuel entry hole


134


, and a pressure pulse hole


136


. The first section


124


of the first frame piece


112


is located in the positioning and fuel entry hole


134


. The positioning and fuel entry hole


134


has an upwardly sloped wall


137


that ends at a top hole that forms the air and fuel inlet


31


. The front end of the first section


124


has an outward upward pitch. The first section


124


has a conduit


138


that opens into the hole


134


and is adapted to be closed by the reed valve


32


. The conduit


138


connects with a tube section


140


in the second section


126


. A swirl chamber


142


circumferentially surrounds the tube section


140


and has an entrance ramp


144


. A gap


146


is provided between the end of the tube section


140


and the inner side of the second frame piece


114


for the fuel/air mixture to move from the swirl chamber


142


into the conduit


138


. An end of the scavenged air tube


116


is located at the entrance ramp


144


. An end of the fuel supply tube


118


is located at the swirl chamber


142


. Thus, fuel is deposited in the swirl chamber


142


by the tube


118


and subsequently atomized and entrained with air from the tube


116


as the air swirls around the swirl chamber


142


. The swirl chamber


142


allows the engine to be orientated at any position (even upsidedown) and still deliver a substantially uniform fuel/air mixture to the combustion chamber


26


. However, in alternate embodiments other designs or configurations of the second unit


72


could be provided. In this embodiment the three air inlet holes


120


,


128


,


132


form the air inlet


24


. The three pulse holes


122


,


130


,


136


form a conduit from the crankcase to the fuel metering device


20


to drive the device via crankcase pressure pulses. However, these holes


122


,


130


,


136


need not be provided if the fuel metering device is driven in another fashion or if a conduit separate from the second unit


72


is provided. By locating the two holes


132


,


134


on the same side


110


of the cylinder


12


, manufacturing the two holes can be accomplished relatively easily with a single die piece in the cylinder molding process such that location of the two holes relative to each other is relatively precise. However, the holes


132


,


134


need not be on the same side and the first section


124


with its conduit


138


could be separate and spaced from a part having an air inlet hole.




Referring now to

FIG. 8

, a schematic view of an alternate embodiment of the present invention is shown. The engine


200


is similar to the engine


10


shown in FIG.


1


. The engine


200


comprises a cylinder


202


, a piston


204


, a fuel metering system


206


, and a fuel injection system


208


. In this embodiment the fuel inlet


210


to the cylinder


202


is open for piston porting by the head of the piston


204


, but it could have a flow check valve. The fuel metering system


206


could be any type of system. However, in this embodiment the fuel metering system


206


delivers fuel directly into the accumulator


212


. The accumulator


212


has an exit


214


at the fuel inlet


210


and is connected to a source of compressed air


216


. The source of compressed air


216


could be a conduit from the crankcase for obtaining scavenged air, a conduit from the exhaust


218


for obtaining expansion gases, a conduit from the combustion chamber


220


for obtaining compression gases as the piston


204


moves towards TDC, or an auxiliary compressed air source. The fuel from the fuel metering system


206


and the air from the compressed air source


216


are mixed into a fuel/air mixture at the accumulator


212


. The fuel injection system


208


also comprises a diaphragm and valve assembly


222


, an inner diaphragm pressure chamber


224


, an outer diaphragm pressure chamber


226


, two conduits


228


,


230


from the crankcase


232


, and a flow restrictor


234


. In this embodiment the diaphragm


236


is not biased by a separate spring, but a biasing spring could be provided. Because the exit


214


from the accumulator


212


is located at the fuel inlet


210


to the cylinder


202


, the accumulator


212


and diaphragm and valve assembly


222


are directly connected to the side of the cylinder


202


rather than at the crankcase


232


. They could also be located at the top wall


238


of the cylinder. In addition, although the valve


240


has generally been illustrated as a rigid rod-like structure with a valve head, alternative valve structures could be used. Thus, the accumulator could be located at the cylinder, but the diaphragm could be located proximate the crankcase or otherwise spaced from the cylinder.




Referring now to

FIG. 9

a schematic view of another alternate embodiment will be described. In this embodiment the engine


300


is similar to the engine


200


shown in FIG.


8


. The engine


300


comprises a cylinder


302


, a piston


304


, a fuel metering system


306


, and a fuel injection system


308


. In this embodiment the fuel inlet


310


to the cylinder


302


is open for piston porting by the head of the piston


304


, but it could have a flow check valve. The fuel metering system


306


could be any type of system. However, in this embodiment the fuel metering system


306


delivers fuel directly into the fuel entry conduit


311


to the fuel inlet


310


. The accumulator


312


has an exit


314


and an entrance


315


. A reed valve


316


is connected to the accumulator


312


proximate the entrance


315


. The valve


318


has a head


320


with a forward valve seating surface and a rearward valve seating surface. An intake conduit


322


extends from the cylinder


302


to a chamber in which the valve head


320


moves; proximate the entrance


315


. The valve


318


is able to reciprocatingly move between two positions. In a rearward position of the valve the rearward valve seating surfaces seats against and seals the accumulator exit


314


. Thus, air can pass through intake conduit


322


, into the entrance


315


, past the valve


316


, and be stored in the accumulator


312


. This stored air is compressed air from the up stroke of the piston


304


. In a forward position of the valve


318


the forward valve seating surface seats against and seals the rear end of the intake conduit


322


. The exit


314


from the accumulator is open in this forward valve position. Therefore, air from inside the accumulator


312


can travel out the exit


314


, through the entry conduit


311


, entrain fuel in the conduit


311


, and exit the fuel inlet


310


into the combustion chamber


324


. The valve


318


is driven between its forward and rearward sealing positions by the diaphragm


326


and pressures in the two diaphragm pressure chambers


328


,


330


. Both chambers


328


,


330


are pressure loaded by pressure from the crankcase


332


with the outer chamber


330


being connected to the crankcase pressure by the flow restrictor


334


. The diaphragm


326


and/or valve


318


may or may not be spring loaded in a forward or rearward position.




Referring also to

FIG. 10

, similar to

FIG. 2

, movement of the valve


318


relative to other events during a single full piston cycle (which results from a 360° rotation of the crankshaft) will be described.

FIG. 10

is intended to illustrate the line of events as a 360° chart corresponding to piston location as based upon angular position of the crankshaft


16


starting at TDC (0°) of the piston


14


. At TDC the fuel inlet


310


is blocked by the side of the head of the piston


304


. Area A′ indicates when the piston head blocks the conduit


322


. The piston head uncovers the conduit


322


about 45° of rotation of the crankshaft after TDC (ATDC). Because the intake conduit


322


is located above the fuel inlet


310


, expansion gases from combustion push the valve


318


into its rearward position before the fuel inlet


310


is unblocked by the piston head. Area B″ indicates when the valve


318


is at its rearward position because of expansion gases pressing against the front face of the valve. Referring also to

FIGS. 11A and 11B

, sample pressures from an engine running at 3200 RPM at wide open throttle are shown from angles ATDC. B in

FIG. 10

indicates when, because of a pressure difference between pressures D and E in chambers


328


and


330


, respectively, the valve


318


would be in its rearward position. Point F, movement of the valve


318


from its forward position to its rearward position can actually vary because, as indicated by B″, the valve is kept rearward by expansion gases until point J which corresponds to open porting of the fuel inlet


310


with the combustion chamber by the piston head. With this embodiment pressure differences in the two chambers


328


,


330


will cause the valve to move forward at point G and allow air in the accumulator to travel out the entry conduit


311


. At point K the piston


304


closes the fuel inlet


310


. Pressure from compression in the combustion chamber


324


by the piston


304


presses against the front end of the valve


318


and moves the valve to its rearward position at area B′″. Thus, the combination of A′, B″ and B′″ indicates when the fuel inlet


310


is blocked from the combustion chamber


324


by the piston


304


. This embodiment illustrates that movement of the injection valve could be configured to move by more than just crankcase pressure. However, use of crankcase pressure to drive pressures in two opposite diaphragm pressure chambers in preferred.




The system as described above is generally intended for use with two-stroke engines having a low pressure fuel metering system, such as below 300 psi and preferably about 6 psi. A high pressure fuel metering system, on the other hand, would operate at pressures of about 3000 to 6000 psi. The pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system as described above (open ported) has been tested with a low pressure fuel metering system and, for an engine displacement size of 25 cc had operating hydrocarbon emissions less than 50 gm/bhp*hr (grams per brake horse power hour) and, more specifically, 39-43 gm/bhp*hr and 32.9-37.5 gm/bhp*hr at WOT.




In the system as described above an open cycle injection is used; i.e.: fuel injection when the exhaust and intake are both open. Injection of scavenged air occurs at the end of scavenging. A fresh air buffer is used in front of the fuel delivery; between TO and G. Unlike a SCIP system that would have early injection of fuel into the combustion chamber when a misfire occurs (and a resulting increase in hydrocarbon emissions), the system as described above would not have an early injection of fuel into the combustion chamber after a misfire. Crankcase pressure is used to both measure and drive the timing of the movement of the valve, but could be used for measurement only if a different drive system is provided. Crankcase pressure is used to control timing of fuel injection; not the fuel metering system. An averaged pressure from the crankcase pressure is used to render the valve movement timing independence of throttle condition.





FIG. 12

is a schematic diagram of a cylinder charged system


400


with a bias spring


402


. The system


400


has an accumulator


404


, a valve


406


, a conduit


408


, a diaphragm


410


, two diaphragm chambers


412


,


414


and a flow restrictor


416


. The valve


406


has a first section


418


for closing the path through the conduit


408


and a second section


420


for opening the path. The spring


402


biases the valve


406


towards its open position. The conduit


408


extends between the accumulator


404


and the side wall of the cylinder


401


. When the valve


406


is in its open position the accumulator


404


can either be charged to its injection pressure P


i


, by expansion gases or a cylinder compression from the cylinder


401


or, alternatively, discharge its fuel/gas mixture into the combustion chamber of the cylinder


401


. The valve


406


is moved by the spring


402


and the diaphragm


410


. The outer chamber


412


receives pressure pulses from the crankcase. The crankcase pressure in the outer chamber


412


is attenuated and averaged into a relatively constant pressure in the inner chamber


414


by the restrictor


416


which varies slightly with engine operation conditions, based upon engine operation parameters such as speed and throttle position.





FIG. 13

is a schematic diagram of a crankcase charged system


430


. The system


430


has an accumulator


432


, spring


402


, valve


406


, conduit


408


, diaphragm


410


, two diaphragm chambers


412


,


414


and the flow restrictor


416


. A conduit


434


is connected from the crankcase of the engine to the outer chamber


412


and the inlet to the accumulator


432


. A check valve


436


is provided at the conduit


434


proximate the inlet to the accumulator


432


. A second check valve


438


is provided at the conduit


408


proximate the inlet to the cylinder


401


.





FIG. 14

is a schematic diagram of a cylinder charged system


440


which charges on the compression stroke of the piston and which has separate charge and injection paths. The system


440


has an accumulator


442


, a valve


444


, spring


402


, conduit


408


, diaphragm


410


, two diaphragm chambers


412


,


414


, flow restrictor


416


, and conduit


446


. The valve


444


has two


448


,


450


open and closed valve sections that are aligned with the two conduits


408


,


446


, respectively. Both sections


448


,


450


are either at an open position at the same time or at a closed position at the same time. Check valves


438


,


452


help to control flow between the injection port


454


and charging port


456


in the side wall of the cylinder


458


.





FIG. 15

is a schematic diagram of a cylinder charged system


460


similar to system


440


, but which charges on the expansion stroke of the piston rather than on the compression stroke. The valve


462


is configured such that the two sections


464


,


466


are alternatively at opened or closed positions.





FIG. 16

is a schematic diagram of a cylinder charged system


480


with an expansion closer mechanism to close the valve early. The system


480


has the accumulator


404


, a valve


482


, conduit


408


, diaphragm


410


, diaphragm chambers


412


,


414


and flow restrictor


416


. The valve


482


has an end


484


that is in communication with conduit


486


. Expansion gases from combustion can pass through the conduit


486


to press against the end


484


and move the valve


482


to its closed position. The end


484


may comprise a second diaphragm which forms a seal that separates combustion gases in conduit


486


from a fuel and air mixture in conduit


408


intended to be injected into the cylinder. In this embodiment inner chamber


414


is connected by a conduit


488


to crankcase pressure. This type of embodiment causes earlier closure of the valve


482


, but does not effect the timing of opening of the valve.





FIG. 17

is a schematic diagram of a system


500


similar to the system


430


shown in FIG.


13


. In this embodiment the valve


502


is a spool valve with a closure section


504


and an open annular channel section


506


. By use of a spool valve injection pressure has no effect on timing of movement of the valve


502


.





FIG. 18

is a schematic diagram of a system


510


similar to the system


430


shown in FIG.


13


. In this embodiment the valve


512


is a poppet valve. The area at the base


514


of the valve head is greater than the diameter of the conduit aperture


516


. Injection pressure P


i


in the accumulator


432


has an effect on timing of movement of the valve


512


, but this effect is minimal.





FIG. 19

is a schematic graph of crankcase pressure similar to

FIG. 3A

with an engine at wide open throttle and having reed valve induction. The dashed horizontal line L is the average crankcase pressure for a single full piston cycle. Area M above line L is representative of differential pressure between the average crankcase pressure L and the actual crankcase pressure D available to hold the injection valve closed. Areas N


1


and N


2


below line L are representative of differential pressure available to hold the injection valve open. Referring also to

FIG. 20

, the effect of a biasing force, such as by a spring, on the injection valve can be seen. In

FIG. 19

“0” is representative of when the valve is closed; i.e., when the crankcase pressure D is above the average pressure L. In

FIG. 20

O


1


is representative of when the injection valve is closed with a system that has an additional opening bias. O


2


is representative of when the injection valve is closed with a system that uses an additional closing bias. The opening bias P


1


and closing bias P


2


are effective bias pressures and, for a biasing spring and diaphragm embodiment, would be the force of the spring divided by the area of the diaphragm.





FIGS. 21A

,


21


B,


21


C represent crankcase pressure D and average crankcase pressure L for a reed valve induction system at idle throttle, half throttle and wide open throttle, respectively. The average crankcase pressure L increases with throttle position and speed of the engine. The same is true for a piston port induction system as seen in

FIGS. 22A

,


22


B and


22


C, respectively, but to a lesser extent.




It should be understood that the foregoing description is only illustrative of the invention. Various alternatives and modifications can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances which fall within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. In an internal combustion engine having a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system with a valve connected to a diaphragm, wherein the improvement comprises:the injection system further comprising a system for moving the valve to a closed position comprising means for using an expansion wave from combustion in a cylinder of the engine to aid in affecting an early movement of the valve to the closed position.
  • 2. An engine as in claim 1 wherein the cylinder has a port through which combustion gas from the cylinder is tapped and presses against the valve to move the valve towards its closed position.
  • 3. An engine as in claim 2 wherein the port is located at a side wall of the cylinder and wherein a piston of the engine shields the port, at least partially, from relatively high combustion gas pressures and temperatures near a top dead center position of the piston in the cylinder.
  • 4. An engine as in claim 2 wherein the injection system further comprises a seal which separates combustion gases from a fuel and air mixture intended to be injected into the cylinder.
  • 5. An engine as in claim 4 wherein the seal is a second diaphragm.
  • 6. In an internal combustion engine having a pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system, wherein the improvement comprises:the injection system comprising a compressed air accumulator with an injection port into a cylinder of the engine and a first valve between the accumulator and the injection port, wherein the valve is adapted to be moved, at least partially, by a combustion expansion wave into the injection port from combustion in the cylinder.
  • 7. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the injection port extends through a lateral side wall of the cylinder.
  • 8. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the injection system comprises a fuel metering system having an exit directly into the accumulator.
  • 9. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the accumulator is connected directly to a lateral side of the cylinder.
  • 10. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the injection system comprises a first conduit between the injection port of the cylinder and a first side of a head of the valve and a second conduit between the cylinder and a second side of the head of the valve.
  • 11. An engine as in claim 10 wherein the first and second conduits are alternatively connected to the accumulator based up positioning of the valve.
  • 12. An engine as in claim 6 further comprising a second valve at an entrance into the accumulator from the valve.
  • 13. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the injection system comprises a second valve between the accumulator and the injection port.
  • 14. An engine as in claim 13 wherein the second valve is a diaphragm driven valve.
  • 15. An engine as in claim 14 wherein the diaphragm driven valve comprises a diaphragm having two sides exposed to crankcase pressure.
  • 16. An engine as in claim 13 wherein the second valve is interposed in a flow path between the first valve and the accumulator.
  • 17. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the injection system comprises a first conduit between the injection port into the cylinder and the accumulator and a second conduit between the accumulator and the cylinder.
  • 18. An engine as in claim 17 wherein the injection system further comprises a second valve assembly extending into the first conduit between the first valve and the accumulator.
  • 19. An engine as in claim 18 wherein the second valve assembly also extends into the second conduit.
  • 20. An engine as in claim 19 wherein the injection system further comprises a third valve located in the second conduit between the second valve assembly and the cylinder.
  • 21. An engine as in claim 19 wherein the second valve assembly is adapted to concurrently open or close pathways through the first and second conduits as the second valve assembly is moved.
  • 22. An engine as in claim 19 wherein the second valve assembly is adapted to alternatingly open and close pathways through the first and second conduits as the second valve assembly is moved.
  • 23. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the injection system is adapted to charge the accumulator on a compression stroke of a piston of the engine.
  • 24. An engine as in claim 6 wherein the injection system is adapted to charge the accumulator on an expansion stroke of a piston of the engine.
  • 25. A method of moving a valve in an internal combustion engine pneumatically controlled compressed air assisted fuel injection system comprising steps of:providing the injection system with a compressed air accumulator and a valve at an injection port from the accumulator into a cylinder of the engine; opening the valve to allow compressed air from the accumulator to exit the injection port into the cylinder; and closing the valve by a combustion expansion wave from combustion in the cylinder entering the injection port and pressing against the valve to move the valve to a closed position.
Parent Case Info

This Appln is a Div of Ser. No. 09/065,374 filed Apr. 23, 1998, U.S. Pat. No. 6,079,379.

US Referenced Citations (67)
Number Name Date Kind
3263701 Johnson Aug 1966
3265050 Tuckey Aug 1966
3353525 Nutten et al. Nov 1967
3441010 Barr et al. Apr 1969
3633557 Tuckey Jan 1972
3640512 Morgenroth Feb 1972
3738623 Tuckey Jun 1973
3743254 Tuckey Jul 1973
3765657 Du Bois Oct 1973
3870025 Anderson et al. Mar 1975
3933949 Woody Jan 1976
4159012 Pizzuto et al. Jun 1979
4210105 Nohira et al. Jul 1980
4455266 Gerhardy Jun 1984
4627390 Antoine Dec 1986
4628881 Beck et al. Dec 1986
4628888 Duret Dec 1986
4693224 McKay Sep 1987
4700668 Schierling et al. Oct 1987
4716877 Duret Jan 1988
4770132 Sougawa Sep 1988
4781164 Seeber et al. Nov 1988
4794902 McKay Jan 1989
4813391 Geyer et al. Mar 1989
4846119 Geyer et al. Jul 1989
4917073 Duret Apr 1990
4944255 Duret Jul 1990
4995349 Tuckey Feb 1991
5027759 Luo Jul 1991
5027765 Duret Jul 1991
5060602 Maissant Oct 1991
5105775 Maissant Apr 1992
5197417 Tuckermann et al. Mar 1993
5197418 Wissmann et al. Mar 1993
5203310 Gatellier Apr 1993
5215064 Monnier et al. Jun 1993
5273004 Duret et al. Dec 1993
5284111 Geyer et al. Feb 1994
5285753 Duret et al. Feb 1994
5351668 Gatallier Oct 1994
5353754 Wissmann et al. Oct 1994
5365893 Wissmann et al. Nov 1994
5377637 Leighton et al Jan 1995
5377650 Warner Jan 1995
5392828 Watson et al. Feb 1995
5419289 Duret et al. May 1995
5438968 Johnson et al. Aug 1995
5441030 Satsukawa Aug 1995
5443045 Marconi Aug 1995
5477822 Haghgooie et al. Dec 1995
5477833 Leighton Dec 1995
5483943 Peters Jan 1996
5483944 Leighton Jan 1996
5546902 Paluch et al. Aug 1996
5551638 Caley Sep 1996
5558070 Bell et al. Sep 1996
5579735 Todero et al. Dec 1996
5588408 Kurihara Dec 1996
5609137 Rembold et al. Mar 1997
5622155 Ellwood et al. Apr 1997
5628295 Todero et al. May 1997
5645026 Schlessmann Jul 1997
5685273 Johnson et al. Nov 1997
5735250 Rembold et al. Apr 1998
5740767 Kaku et al. Apr 1998
5794600 Hill Aug 1998
5809949 Duret Sep 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
0302045 Feb 1989 EP
397695 Jun 1994 EP
WO 9607817 Mar 1996 FR
77105061 Jul 1988 JP
WO 9600843 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9702424 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9722852 Jun 1997 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
A Trial For Stabilizing Combustion in Two-Stroke Engines at Part Throttle Operation, Y. Ishibashi et al., A New Generation of Two-Stroke Engines for the Future?, 1993, pp. 113-124.
“IAPAC Two-Stroke Engine for High Efficiency Low Emissions Scooters”, G. Monner et al., A New Generation of Two-Stroke Engines for the Future?, 1993, pp. 101-111.
“The IAPAC Fluid Dynamically Controlled Automotive Two-Stroke Combustion Process”, P. Duret et al., A New Generation of Two-Stroke Engines for the Future?, 1993, pp. 77-98.
SAE Technical Paper Series, “Development of a Fuel Injected Two-Stroke Gasoline Engine”, D. Plohberger et al., Paper No. 880170, 1988, 17 pages.
“Recent Research Activities on Small Diesel and Gasoline Engines”, K. Landfahrer, C372/018, 5 pages.
Advertisement, “AVL SDIS, Semi Direct Injection System”, AVL List GmbH, 1 page.
Le Moteur A Deux-Temps, A Injection Electronique, Ingenieurs de L'automobile, Nov. 1977, 26 pages by Jaulmes et al., pp 717-729, and 30 page translation of Ingenieurs de l'Automobile.
Development of A Pumpless Air Assisted Injection System for Two-cycle, S.I. Engines, R. Gentili et al., SAE, 1994, pp. 87-100.
IAPAC Compressed Air Assisted Fuel Injection for High Efficiency Low Emissions Marine Outboard Two-Stroke Engines, G. Monnier et al., SAE Paper 911849, 1991, pp. 123-135.
Delayed Charging: A Means to Improve Two-Stroke Engine Characteristics, P. Rochelle, SAE Paper 941678, 1994, pp. 1-9.
The OCP Small Engine Fuel Injection System For Future Two-Stroke Marine Engines, S. Leighton et al., SAE Paper 941687, 1994, pp. 115-122.
Diaphragm Injection Carburettor (DIC) for Stratified-Scavenging of Small Two-Stroke Gasoline Engine, X. Yang et al., SAE Paper 960364, 1996, pp. 55-62.
Diaphragm Fuel Injection System (DFI) for Stratified-Scavenging of Small Two-Stoke Gasoline Engine, X. Yang et al., SAE Paper 960365, 1996, pp. 63-71.
Improving The Exhaust Emission of Two-Stroke Engines by Applying the Activated Radical Combustion, Y. Ishibashi et al., SAE Paper 960742, 1996, pp. 113-123.
Pro-Ject Air-Assisted Fuel Injection System for Two-Stoke S.I. Engines, R. Gentili et al., SAE Paper 960360, pp. 1-6.
Application of Direct Air-Assisted Fuel Injection to a SI Cross-Scavenged Two-Stroke Engine, R. G. Kenny, et al., SAE Paper 932396, 1993, pp. 37-50.
“The Orbital Combustion Procss for Future Small Two-Stroke Engines”, S. Leighton et al., A New Generation of Two-Stroke Engines for the Future?, 1993, pp. 195-206.
New Developments for Clean Marine Outboard Two-Stroke Engines, P. Duret, A New Generation of Two-Stroke Engines for the Future?, 1993, pp. 125-145.
SCIP: A New Simplified Camless IAPAC Direct Injection for Low Emission Small Two-Strike Engines, J. Dabadie, SAE Paper, 10 pages.
“Emission and Fuel Consumption Reduction in a Two-Stroke Engine Using Delayed-Charging” by Rochelle, SAE Paper 951784, 1995, pp. 217-226.
RedMax Scores With Air head Engine, Power Equipment Trade, Jul. 1998, p. 74.
“Tanaka Meets CARB Tier II With New PureFire Engine” By Ken Morrison, Power Equipment Trade, Jul. 1998, pp. 16-22 and 116.