The present invention pertains to a wear assembly, and especially to a wear assembly for use with mining, excavating and earthmoving equipment. The inventive design is particularly well suited for an excavating tooth, but may also be used for the support of other wear members.
In mining and construction, wear members are typically provided along the digging edge of the equipment to protect the bucket or the like and/or to engage and break up the ground to be gathered. Accordingly, the wear parts are subjected to highly abrasive conditions and experience considerable wearing. The wear parts must then be replaced on a periodic basis.
In order to minimize the loss of material due to replacement of worn parts, the wear assemblies are typically manufactured as two or more separable components including an adapter and a wear member. The adapter is attached to the digging edge by welding, mechanical attachment, or being cast along an edge of the excavating device so as to present a forwardly projecting nose for supporting the wear member. The wear member has a socket that is received over the nose, and a forward working end. In a point, the working end is typically a narrowed digging edge. The wear member substantially envelops the adapter nose and thereby tends to protect the nose from wear. For example, depending on a variety of factors, generally five to twenty points can be successively mounted on a single adapter before the adapter becomes worn and in need of replacement. To accommodate replacement of the wear member in the field, the wear member is usually secured to the adapter nose by a removable lock (e.g., a lock pin).
Wear assemblies used in mining, excavation and construction, and particularly excavating tooth systems, are subjected to large and varied forces applied in all directions. As a result, points and other wear members must be firmly secured to the adapter to withstand the axial, vertical, reverse and lateral loads as well as impacts, vibrations and other kinds of forces. Vertical loads have been particularly troublesome in that large moment forces are generated that tend to “rotate” the wear members forward on the adapter and at times result in the ejection of the member. While the walls of the adapter nose provide support for the wear member, the lock in most cases also plays a large role in retaining the point and resisting loads, particularly moment and reverse forces.
In a conventional tooth system 1 (
In the present example of a central downward load P, the vertical component of reaction force A, in general, equals the downward load P plus the vertical component of reaction force B. However, because of the converging walls of the nose, the horizontal component of each of the reaction forces A and B is in a forward direction that tends to urge the point off the nose. To the extent these forces are not resisted directly by the geometry and friction of the nose and socket, they are resisted as shear loads by the lock pin. The repeated application of high shear loads can place unacceptably high stresses on the lock pin and result in its breakage.
Further, in such conventional teeth, the lock pin is typically hammered into place and tightly held by frictional forces applied primarily by the placement of the holes in the point relative to the hole in the adapter nose. However, wearing of the point and adapter will tend to loosen the connection and increase the risk of losing the lock pin. Accordingly, the lock pin is often initially set very tightly in the defined opening so as to put off the time when excessive looseness develops. The lock pin must then be driven into and out of the opening by repeated blows of a large hammer. This can be a troublesome and time-consuming task, especially in the larger sized teeth.
A take-up elastomer has often been placed in front of the lock pin in an effort to maintain a tight fit between the point and adapter when wearing begins to develop. While the elastomer functions to pull the point onto the adapter, it also reduces the lock's ability to resist the applied moment and reverse forces. These loads tend to place more stress on the elastomer than it can withstand. As a result, during use, overworking of the elastomer can result in its premature failure and loss of the lock pin, which then results in loss of the point.
The loss of a point due to pin failure, looseness or elastomer problems not only results in premature loss of the point and wearing of the adapter nose, but also in possible damage to machinery that may be processing the excavated material, particularly in a mining operation. Moreover, since the adapter is often welded in place, replacement of an adapter usually results in significant down time for the digging equipment.
A variety of different point and nose designs have been developed to increase the stability of the point-adapter coupling, reduce the forces tending to eject the point, and lessen loading on the lock.
In one tooth design 1′ (
In another design, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,709,043 to Jones et al., the nose and socket are each provided with a front squared section and rear bearing surfaces that are substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tooth. In this construction, the combined effect of the front stabilizing flats and parallel bearing surfaces create reaction forces at the tip and base of the nose that are generally only vertical. Such vertical reaction forces will in general not generate substantial horizontal components. Accordingly, this construction greatly reduces the forces tending to push the point off of the adapter. Such stabilizing of the point also reduces shifting and movement of the point on the adapter nose for reduced wearing. Nevertheless, multiple other factors (such as impacts, etc.) as well as reverse forces can still apply high shear forces to the lock.
In one other design, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,353,532 to Hahn, the point and adapter are each provided with a helical turn or thread so that the point is rotated about its longitudinal axis when mounted on the adapter nose. On account of the threads, the point rotates about the longitudinal axis of the tooth and generally presses the lock against the adapter nose when ejection forces are applied. The lock is much less likely to fail when under these kinds of compression forces as opposed to the high shear forces applied in conventional teeth. While this construction provides great strength and retention benefits, the nose and socket are complex and more expensive to manufacture.
The present invention pertains to a wear assembly that provides a stable coupling which is able to resist heavy loading without placing undue stress on the lock.
In one aspect of the invention, a wear assembly includes bearing surfaces that are formed such that the wear member is tightened onto the adapter with the application of certain loads on the wear member. In one preferred construction, the bearing surfaces are oriented such that the horizontal components of reaction forces generated to resist, for example, centrally applied vertical loads are directed rearward so as to push the wear member more tightly onto the adapter nose.
In another aspect of the invention, the wear member rotates on and off of the adapter about its longitudinal axis to better resist ejection forces. In a preferred embodiment, the rotation is accomplished with generally linear rails and grooves that are easy and inexpensive to manufacture. These complementary rails and grooves enable the assembly to have a more slender profile than otherwise possible with helical threads for better penetration in excavation uses and less use of metal. Such grooves and rails also avoid the generation of high stress risers due to the use of relatively sharp grooves used to form helical threads.
In another aspect of the invention, the adapter nose or socket of the wear member is formed with rails that diverge as they extend rearward. The complementary nose or socket then includes grooves that matingly receive the rails. In a preferred embodiment, the vertical divergence of the rails precludes an axial mounting of the wear member and requires the wear member to twist as it is moved onto or off of the adapter nose.
In another aspect of the invention, the adapter includes two bearing surfaces positioned on opposite sides of the longitudinal axis and facing in opposite directions. In a preferred embodiment, these bearing surfaces reduce wear on the extreme fibers on the top and bottom of the nose. Moreover, the bearing surfaces are preferably formed as part of rails on the adapter so as to form a generally Z-shaped cross-section.
In another aspect of the invention, the adapter nose and socket of the wear member widen as they extend forwardly. In a preferred embodiment, the adapter and socket include complementary rails and grooves that diverge to require twisting of the wear member during installation. This construction provides sufficient clearance to receive the forwardly widened nose into the socket to better resist ejection of the wear member.
In another aspect of the invention, the lock is tapered to fit into a complementary channel to reduce frictional forces and ease the insertion and removal of the lock. In this configuration, the length of the lock does not frictionally slide through aligned openings, but rather engages the sides of the channel at or near the place of engagement. Hammering of the lock as it is inserted or removed is avoided. In a preferred embodiment, the lock includes a lock member to secure the lock in the channel to prevent unwanted loss or ejection.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
a is a perspective view of the lock shown in
b is a side view of the lock shown in
a is a perspective view of the lock shown in
b is a perspective view of the lock shown in
The present invention is directed to a wear assembly for protecting a wear surface. In particular, the wear assembly is especially adapted for use in excavating, mining, construction and the like. The wear assembly is well suited for use in forming an excavating tooth system, but could also be used to form other wear members.
For purposes of illustration, the present application describes the inventive construction as an excavating tooth system. The production of other wear parts (e.g., a shroud) would utilize the same nose and socket constructions, but could have different working and mounting ends. For the sake of description only, terms such as upper, lower, vertical, etc. are used in this specification and are to be understood as pertaining to the tooth system as oriented in
In a preferred construction, a tooth system 10 comprises a point 12, adapter 14 and lock 16 (
The nose is generally wedge shaped and formed by converging walls 24, 26, sidewalls 28, 30, and a front bearing surface 32. Bearing surface 32 is adapted to receive axially directed loads applied to the wear member 12. The converging walls 24, 26 are preferably formed with a gentle transverse curve for enhanced strength and durability (
The sidewalls 28, 30 of the nose 18 are each formed with a flank 34 and a rail 35 having an outer surface 36 and a lateral surface 37 (
In a preferred construction, one rail extends adjacent and substantially parallel to each converging wall 24, 26. Accordingly, an outside edge of each converging wall 24, 26 defines the top or bottom of the adjacent rail while lateral surface 37 extends generally parallel to the rearward extension of the converging wall. Nevertheless, variations are possible. For example, the lateral surfaces may have a non-linear shape or an extension that is not parallel to the converging wall. Further, the rails may be spaced from the converging walls such that they could have a second lateral surface (not shown) apart from the converging walls 24, 26.
The outer surface 36 of each rail 35 is substantially vertical. Preferably, the lateral surface 37 and flank 34 are inclined to form a generally V-shaped recess 40 (
The point 12 has a generally wedge-shaped configuration defined by converging walls 43, 45 and sidewalls 47, 49 (
The socket 53 is preferably shaped to matingly receive the adapter nose 18 (
While the nose is preferably on the adapter and the socket in the point to minimize the amount of metal needed in the wear member, a rearwardly extending nose could be provided on the point to be received in a socket defined in the adapter. Also, the socket and nose constructions could be reversed so that internal rails (not shown) could be provided in the socket with mating grooves provided on the nose (not shown).
On account of the diverging rails 35 and grooves 65, the point 12 must be turned or rotated as it is fit onto the adapter nose 18. In the preferred construction, the point rotates on the order of an eighth of a turn as it is installed. As a result, the point fits onto the adapter nose in much the same way as if the point and adapter were formed with helical threads rather than with straight rails and grooves. The point 12 is mounted to the nose 18 by first orienting the point 12 with respect to the nose 18 so that the rear portion 73 of each groove 65 is located adjacent to the front portion 75 of a corresponding rail 35 in order to receive the rail, as shown in
The present invention thus achieves certain advantages provided by the earlier wear assemblies provided with helical threads (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,353,532), but with a simpler and less expensive geometry to manufacture. The opposing rails of the present invention are easier to cast than the helical thread assemblies. In addition, the use of larger rails and grooves instead of sharper helical grooves lowers the stress risers in the nose for enhanced strength and durability.
The present invention also achieves other advantages over the conventional helical thread assemblies. The present invention does not use a conical base for the nose, but rather uses a more slender profile wedge shape. Thus, the height of the nose (between the top and bottom surface) is not restricted by a conical base, and therefore the height of the nose may be adjusted according to need. The nose of the present invention may therefore be used to form tooth systems with more slender profiles than those provided with helical threads. The more slender profile tooth system provides for better penetration during digging and requires less metal to make.
In addition, the degree of twist can be varied by changing the angle defining the divergence of the rails. In general, the greater the angle, the greater the amount of twist the point undergoes during installation and removal.
With this construction, the point 12 is stably positioned on the adapter nose 18. As compared to a conventional tooth, a centrally applied vertical load P1 on the free end 51 of the point 12 generates a smaller ejection force on account of the horizontal components of the reaction forces A1 and B1 (
In another preferred construction, the front free end 42 of the nose 18a is formed to have a generally rectangular configuration with upper and lower stabilizing flats 44, 46 (
In the preferred tooth system 10a, a centrally applied downward load P2 on the free end of the point 12a creates a substantially vertical reaction force A2 with generally no horizontal component acting as an ejection force (
This construction provides a substantial improvement in point stability. The generation of the resultant tightening forces will lessen loading on the lock pin and reduce the risk of point loss. The resultant tightening forces will also tend to reduce the movement of the point on the adapter nose, which in turn will reduce the wearing of the tooth construction. Moreover, because the system is tightened while under most predominant or normal vertical and axial loading, the manufacturing tolerances can be loosened for easier and less expensive manufacturing, the use of take-up style lock pins (with load bearing elastomers) can be eliminated, and gauging requirements can be reduced without shortening the useful life of the tooth. Instead, the tooth will have enhanced durability.
In a conventional tooth system (see
As an alternative, because of the rotation used to install and remove the tooth system, the front end of the nose and corresponding socket can actually be wider than the rear end of the nose; that is, the sidewalls can be tapered to diverge slightly at an angle up to about 5 degrees as they extend forward. This expansion of the nose and socket widths at the front of the nose will tend to restrict the paths for removing the point from the nose to the designed rotation even as wearing occurs. As a result, this construction provides increased resistance to forces tending to remove the point and especially reverse forces.
As another alternative, the nose can be provided with longitudinally extending rails 80 that include outer faces 81 and lateral bearing faces 83 (
In regard to all of the embodiments, the nose and points are preferably formed to be rotationally symmetrical about the longitudinal axis X so that the points can be reversibly mounted on the nose. Nevertheless, asymmetrical nose and/or points could be used in this invention.
The point and adapter assembly of the present invention can be used with a wide variety of different locks to resist removal of the point from the adapter. Because the lock 16 withstands compression forces at least partially in lieu of shear forces (and thus experiences reduced shear loading) in resisting the ejection of point 12 from nose 18, the lock need not be as robust as locks used with other conventional point and adapter assemblies applying substantially only shear loads on the locks. The placement of the lock 16 is preferably along one side of the nose 18, as shown in
In the preferred construction, a tapered locking pin 16′ is provided to secure the point to the adapter. Referring more particularly to
The locking pin 16′ has a corresponding tapered shape to fit within the tapered channel 103 (
The nose 18′ defines a slot 113 in communication with the channel 103 to allow the lug 93′ and ear 91′ to pass along the side of the nose to a position within the channel. The pin 16′ defines a recess 115 behind the rear surface 107 and proximate to the web 111 for receiving a portion of the lug 93′. The locking pin 16′ may be formed from any conventional method, such as by casting.
The lock pin 16′ is preferably retained in the channel 103 through the use of a locking member. In the embodiment shown in
The lock pin 16′ could also be used in conjunction with other wear assemblies. For example, as shown in
Alternatively, other locking members may be provided, such as an elastomer backed detent to resist removal of the pin from the groove. In addition, while the embodiment of
As examples of alternatives, lock pins 131,133 (
One of the advantages of a tapered pin is that it is easier to install and remove than a conventional drive-through pin. The tapered surfaces allow the locking pin to be inserted without encountering any resistance from the surface of the point or nose until the locking pin is almost entirely inserted into the channel. The tapered locking pin may be removed using a pry tool, rather than being hammered because the pin need only travel a short distance before it is free from the channel. Once free, the lock pin may be removed by hand. In contrast, with a conventional drive-through lock pin, the two bearing surfaces of the pin are nearly parallel in order to ensure good bearing contact between the point and the nose. Consequently, the drive-through locking pin encounters significant resistance along the entire distance of travel as it is inserted into or removed from the wear assembly.
Another advantage of the tapered lock pin of the present invention is that the force required to remove the lock with the lock member engaged is greater than that required to remove a conventional drive-through locking pin. The tapered locking pin is prevented from moving downward because the groove narrows or terminates, and the locking member, such as the set screw, prevents the lock pin from moving upward out of the groove. The lock pin thus relies on mechanical interference, rather than a tight fit, to prevent removal of the tapered locking pin once installed.
The above discussion concerns the preferred embodiments of the present invention. Various other embodiments as well as many changes and alterations may be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspects of the invention as claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
821215 | Cantlebery et al. | May 1906 | A |
1729889 | McNinch | Oct 1929 | A |
2032875 | Graham | Mar 1936 | A |
2040085 | Fykse et al. | May 1936 | A |
2124230 | Hosmer et al. | Jul 1938 | A |
2145663 | Reynolds | Jan 1939 | A |
2419677 | Daniels et al. | Apr 1947 | A |
2483032 | Baer | Sep 1949 | A |
2846790 | Davis et al. | Aug 1958 | A |
2896345 | Peklay | Jul 1959 | A |
2982035 | Stephenson | May 1961 | A |
2987838 | Stratton | Jun 1961 | A |
3082555 | Hill | Mar 1963 | A |
3117386 | Ferwerda | Jan 1964 | A |
3453756 | Schroeder | Jul 1969 | A |
3496658 | Eyolfson | Feb 1970 | A |
4103442 | Zepf | Aug 1978 | A |
4136469 | Zepf | Jan 1979 | A |
4326348 | Emrich | Apr 1982 | A |
4335532 | Hahn et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4391050 | Smith et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4404760 | Hahn et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4470210 | Hahn | Sep 1984 | A |
4481728 | Mulder et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4577423 | Hahn | Mar 1986 | A |
4761900 | Emrich | Aug 1988 | A |
4811505 | Emrich | Mar 1989 | A |
4965945 | Emrich | Oct 1990 | A |
5018283 | Fellner | May 1991 | A |
5068986 | Jones | Dec 1991 | A |
5074062 | Hahn et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5148616 | Maguina-Larco | Sep 1992 | A |
5152087 | Maguina-Larco | Oct 1992 | A |
5152088 | Hahn | Oct 1992 | A |
5177886 | Klett | Jan 1993 | A |
5272824 | Cornelius | Dec 1993 | A |
5325615 | Hutchins et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5423138 | Livesay et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5469648 | Jones et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5561925 | Livesay | Oct 1996 | A |
5564206 | Ruvang | Oct 1996 | A |
5709043 | Jones et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718070 | Ruvang | Feb 1998 | A |
5778571 | Pasqualini et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5802752 | Quarfordt | Sep 1998 | A |
5868518 | Chesterfield et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5918391 | Vinas Peya | Jul 1999 | A |
5937550 | Emrich | Aug 1999 | A |
5956874 | Ianello et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5992063 | Mack | Nov 1999 | A |
6018896 | Adamic | Feb 2000 | A |
6030143 | Kreitzberg | Feb 2000 | A |
6047487 | Clendenning | Apr 2000 | A |
6108950 | Ruvang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6158917 | Wolin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6247255 | Clendenning | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6374521 | Pippins | Apr 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2162474 | Dec 1971 | DE |
1048792 | Nov 2000 | EP |
2 545 122 | Nov 1984 | FR |
469561 | Jul 1993 | SE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060265916 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10714884 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 11498407 | US | |
Parent | 09899535 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10714884 | US |