Patent Grant
8301371
1. Field of Invention The present invention relates to a system and method for providing the capability for spatial searches used to find and rate points of interest (POI) information and items associated with various POIs, such as for finding the best restaurant, or for finding a specific book in a highly rated bookstore in the surrounding area.
2. Description of the Related Art
Current rating search systems are based on static non-spatial searches that provide users with the ability to select only categorical searches that deal with specific inputted preferences. For instance, typical Internet-based rating systems allow users to search regions for restaurants based on name, cost, and/or area. These search systems can provide information that is based on only broad spatial inputted information, such as a given city or zip code. Also, prior art search systems are limited in the type of POIs they can search against. Typically users can rate and search, using standard personal computers with static Internet connections, only restaurants.
Additionally, map programs are well known in the art, which provide a graphical representation of a set of geographical coordinates, such as streets and highways. These map programs can also be purchased with geocoded POI information, such as restaurants and movie theaters. Current map programs provide search capability for finding the desired POI information nearest to a given inputted geographical coordinate information, such as an address of a house.
Navigational devices are typically defined as devices that provide a unit's local position and a way of planning a course around the unit's local position, sometimes to a remote position, as in the case of an in-vehicle navigational device, also well known in the art. Typically, an in-vehicle navigation device consists of a display screen, processing unit, storage unit, and user input mechanism. The storage system typically contains, for example, maps and travel information used for navigational purposes. Travel information may include POIs such as local restaurants, theaters, municipality locations, and the like.
Determining one's position using a navigational device has typically been accomplished by integrating or connecting a Global Positioning System (GPS) device with various types of computing devices, such as a personal computer or handheld GPS unit. New positioning determination systems include network-assisted wireless location systems, such as Time-of-Arrival (TOA), and network-assisted GPS systems for determining the navigational device's position. The unit's location is then displayed on the device and is available for various applications, such as in the case of a commuter seeking the shortest route to a location in a specific area or a user wanting to find the nearest gas station.
A need exists for users to have the ability to rate and conduct a spatial search for all POI information, such as golf courses, restaurants, home addresses, hotels, hair salons, bowling allies, etc., and items associates with various POIs based on the users' current position information and utilizing various search metric queries. These search metric queries can include, for example, searching based on one's own personally highest-rated choices, searching for ratings compiled by various other users, such as people with a common interest about a particular POI, or searching based on an aggregate average user rating response. Thus, there is a need for providing these spatial searches and rating capabilities based on various metrics, all of which is configurable by the user. These spatial searches and ratings are based on the knowledge of the user's position information and can provide the means to navigate to such desired POI's location, since the user may require the best travel route possible from the user's current position. Routes can be calculated using real-time traffic information and the highest speed-rated street or highway with the fewest stops to determine the shortest possible travel route.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a plurality of methods for searching various POIs within a given search zone, such as a radial search, boxed boundary search, or a zip code or city search, based on position information from a navigational device. The search method incorporates a categorical rating metrics search engine for providing the searcher with an indexed response of the highest rated POI information within the spatial search zone based on the user's search criteria. The POI ratings are based on various quantitative factors or user's experiences, such as decor, service, food, location, etc., or based on various pricing structures, such as the estimated cost of the POI service, such as an average restaurant meal price or typical amusement park gate fee.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for allowing a user to rate POIs based on various quality factors, such as décor, service, food, price, location, etc. In one embodiment, a user can rate a POI based on a simple rating metric, such as a scale of 1-40, where 1 represents the worst overall user experience and 40 represents the best overall user experience. The user can also drill down into more specific rating categories that represent more granularity of the overall POI rating, for example the quality of service or décor. Additionally, not all POIs preferably incorporate the same rating metrics. For example, a food establishment rating metric might include average price per entrée or general price categories, such as inexpensive, moderate, very expensive, etc., while for a business bank such a field is inappropriate.
It is another object of the invention to provide a method to compensate for various POIs that have not been rated by any or enough users, such that the results of a search for a particular POI would not be as reliable as compared to a large number of users having rated a single POI. In one embodiment, this compensation is provided, when necessary, by assigning greater rating value to known professional critics' reviews, or the like, as compared to that of an individual user's reviews, such that the search results for a given POI are valid for this initial special case until sufficient individual users have rated a particular POI to average out any individual user's bias of a particular POI contrary to the mean users' rating values.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a plurality of methods for searching various items associated with various POIs within a given search zone, such as a radial search, boxed boundary search, or a zip code or city search, based on position information. The search method can incorporate various rating search methods, such as a categorical rating metrics search for providing the searcher with an indexed response of the highest rated POIs within a given area that are associated with a specific searched item. In one embodiment, a user wanting to find the highest rated stores (i.e., POIs) in a given area that carry a particular item that he or she wishes to purchase or view may want the search to be based on his or her current position information, such as by utilizing a navigational device or manually inputted address information, and possibly determine if the specific rated stores have the item in stock and how many are remaining. Examples of such searches may include a search for a theater playing a desired movie, a computer store selling a desired software application, or a store selling video game consoles within a given price range, This search can be accomplished utilizing any computing device, such as a standard personal computer, and it is not limited to navigational devices, such that a user could specify a general area or location using various methods, such as selecting an area on a map or entering various address information fields.
It is yet another object of the invention to search for POI ratings by location or to notify a user about a POI rating based on his or her location without having to initiate a detailed search to find various POIs using a navigational device. In one embodiment, users can have the mobile device notify them that there are ratings about a particular POI based on their proximity to the POI. For instance, if a user is in or near a particular restaurant, the system can notify the user that one or more ratings exist for that restaurant so that the user can view such ratings. This allows users to read various ratings about a POI without having to initiate a search for the POI, which can be cumbersome and difficult on any device, especially a mobile device.
It is another object of the invention to allow a means to identify a user through an authentication and authorization procedure, in order to, for instance, ensure that a user is correctly identified as authorized to submit ratings to the overall system or allowed to access the rating system search engine for a particular type of search field or within a given spatial zone.
It is another object of the invention for the user to have access to the online networked rating search engine, such as through a wireless, wired, infrared, or optical connection acting as the physical layer for the cases where a network connection is required or appropriate.
It is another object of the invention to provide a means for the user to obtain real-time search queries from the online networked rating search engine on various devices, such as using a networked navigational device, or by caching POI rating information for a given region, such as a city, county, state, or nation, when using a mobile device without connectivity to the online networked server. Additionally, rating information that the user compiled while the device was disconnected from the online networked rating search engine can be uploaded to the online networked rating search engine once the device is connected to the Internet, such as by using a technique called hot synching, where a device interfaces to a computer with an Internet connection, or by connecting the device to a dialup modem with an established Internet connection, or a similar method as commonly known to a person in the art.
It is another object of the invention to enable the request and delivery of such rating search queries and responses via various local device or network-enabled server means, such as by using a numeric, alphanumeric, or speech-enabled interface, a graphical user interface (GUI) display, or a software Application Program Interface (API), or the like. Additionally, the search results can be delivered over a network connection from the online networked rating search engine to the client by means of a Voice-Over-IP (VoIP) connection (e.g., H.323 protocols) using a server-sided Text-To-Speech (TTS) implementation, or by using a streaming audio format to the client. The information can also be delivered over different physical layers, such as an additional RF connection using an AM (Amplitude Modulated) or FM (Frequency Modulated) standard format for transmitting the appropriate data.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a method for enabling users that are at or near a specific POI to rate only that POI, taking into consideration the user's position information provided by various means, such as by a navigational device. For example, this precludes users from blindly rating all POIs that are considered franchises or chains in a given region, or nationally, if they had a particular experience at a local POI that may not apply to other POIs of the same franchises or chain.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a method for searching, using various search methods, an entire chain or franchise based on various quality factors, such as store locations, and enabling the user to check if a POI associated with the chain or franchise is within a given area. Additionally, directions can be provided to the desired POI based on the user's position information. In one embodiment, this search allows users to search specifically for a chain or franchise, which may offer better nationwide return policies, or user satisfaction, for example, and this search can also indicate the store branch near a given location. Users can also obtain real-time driving directions from their current position to the desired store with the use of a navigational device. In another embodiment, a user may ask, “Find me the best rated electronic store chain that has stores in New Jersey and California.” This would be useful for a user living in New Jersey who is going to buy a TV, but knows he or she will be living in California in a few months and may want to return it or have it repaired in California if it breaks.
It is still another object of the invention to enable users to update their previously submitted ratings after reconsidering his or her original submission. In one embodiment, the rating re-submission may not require the user to be located within a nearby POI, and thus can be done from anywhere.
It is still another object of the invention to provide various rating searches, such as 1). Best Categorical Rating Search, 2). Aggregate Average Population Rating Search, 3). Personal—Favorites Rating Search, 4). Similar User-Rating Search.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a method that allows for the storage and easy retrieval of various POIs, reviews, and other additional information about various POIs, in a user's preferences, such as the ‘Personal—Favorites Rating Search’ provides. Additionally, maps of varying resolution and size can be displayed of such stored POIs.
It is still another object of the invention to provide geo-triggered notifications to a navigational device based on the stored POI's position information and the navigational device's position. In one embodiment, a user on travel may want to plan the trip by using various rating searches or address information to identify various POIs, such as a historical landmark, famous restaurant, etc. Once these various POIs are stored into the system, locally, on the navigational device, or on the online networked system server, the system would apprise or alert the user when he or she is near these various stored POIs, such as within the POI's city of location or a block away from the POI's location, based on the system's or user's pre-defined notification boundary or range settings.
It is still another object of the invention to provide geo-triggered notifications to POIs based on the user's real-time position information. In one embodiment, users that store favorite POIs can receive special coupons from the specific POI based on the user's location relative to the POI and the triggering area set by the POI. The users can then opt-in at any time to receive such geo-triggered coupons.
It is yet still another object of the invention to provide a searched indexed POI response that can provide, as in the form of a link to another display or within the same display, a detailed user review of a specific POI, thus allowing users to read what they or other users have written about a specific POI. Additionally, this also provides the ability to read a review from a professional critic known in the specific field of the POI, such as a food critic rating a restaurant.
It is yet still another object of the invention to allow users to store personal note information about a specific geographical POI, or chain or franchise of POIs, for their own review anytime. In one embodiment, after choosing a desired restaurant POI in a given location, users may want to recall their favorite entrée that they had ordered when they previously visited the restaurant POI, and users may want to recall, for example, not to get the spaghetti with white sauce, but with red sauce, and to add seafood to the entrée. Additionally, for example, a user may customize specific notes about specific destination POIs prior to actually being located in the region of the specific POIs. The personalized POI note information can be stored locally on the navigational device, or uploaded to the online networked rating search engine, and later accessed, which in one embodiment, can all be done utilizing authorization and authentication procedures. This custom note creation and its access can be accomplished via any computing device, such as a personal computer, and it is not limited to navigational devices.
It is yet still another object of the invention to provide users directions from their current location to a desired POI that was provided from a search query. These directions can be provided in various formats, such as text, voice (i.e., speech directions), mapping of varying resolutions, etc., and may encompass additional information that may add to the accuracy of the provided direction information. In one embodiment, a user in a vehicle may require routable driving directions from their present location to the desired POI which incorporates various additional information that will aid in the accuracy and efficiency of the direction information, such as real-time traffic information and appropriate highway ramp or street turn restrictions that can be time dependent (i.e., right turn only from 7 AM to 5 PM). As an additional example, directions for a hiker seeking a POI, such as a camp ground, might require a routable hiking trail or directional information, such as the ability to provide azimuth, elevation, altitude, altitude difference, line-of-sight (LOS) distance, and curved earth LOS distance measurements, between the user and the destination POI, which can be delivered to the user in various formats, such as text, voice (i.e., speech directions), mapping of varying resolutions, etc.
It is yet still another object of the invention to provide a method of indexing desired POIs based on their location relative to a pre-defined route and the user's current position information provided by a navigational device, such that POIs that are closer to the pre-defined route are given a higher priority index than POIs that are off the current pre-defined route and would require a considerable detour from the pre-defined route, or near the pre-defined route, but that have been passed by the navigational device. In one embodiment, a user that has defined a route from point A to point B and is navigating on the predefined route would want to find the highest rated restaurant in the nearby area for dinner within an area between point A and point B. Using a variety of aforementioned search methods, the search may return 4 restaurants that all have equal ratings and are all approximately the same driving distance from the navigational device's current position. However, only one restaurant's position is directly ahead on the pre-defined route of the navigational device, while 1 of the other 3 restaurants is behind the navigational device on the pre-defined route, and the other 2 are off the route on either side of the navigational device. Thus, the restaurant that is located nearest to the pre-defined route, closest to the navigational device, and on a portion of the pre-defined route which has not already been traversed and requires minimal or no deviation from the pre-defined route will have the highest indexed response, and is displayed in a rating window relative to the other restaurant ratings. In another embodiment, the system can provide the total off-route driving time necessary to reach the POI and then back to the pre-defined route for each indexed POI.
It is yet still another object of the present invention to provide a method for providing a plurality of stopover POIs when defining a route from a START position to an END position. The search method can incorporate various search methods, such as the ‘Personal—Favorites Rating Search’ for providing the searcher with an indexed response of various POIs for use in planning a route. In one embodiment, a user will search for various POIs based on a variety of preferences that the user wishes to incorporate in the search parameters. The searcher would then add a single or plurality of POIs to be included in the route to be calculated. The route engine would then calculate the route based on various factors, such as traffic information, speed limits, turn restrictions, etc., and user preferences, such as preferred streets or highways to use or avoid, while incorporation the selected POIs as stopover points during the route. In one embodiment, a user on travel wishing to visit an amusement park would search for a selected amusement park by name, and then add the POI to the preferred route and specify that the START and END positions are the same, the user's home address. The system would then calculate the route to and from the amusement park. Additionally, the user can add a plurality of POIs to be used in the route calculation and have the START and END points at different locations. Also, the user can identify which POIs they would like to visit in any specific order, or the system can determine the optimal order based on the location of the various identified POIs and the START and END positions for the route calculation.
It is yet still another object of the invention to provide these aforementioned capabilities on various devices, such as personal/workstation/tablet computing devices, personal digital assistance (PDA) devices, telephone (both wired and wireless) devices, or various devices with Voice-Over-IP (VoIP) capability and including any VoIP derivatives, such as Voice-Over-DSL (VoDSL), in which all devices have access to various forms of position information, such as GPS or network-based positioning techniques, such as Time-Of-Arrival (TOA) implementations.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a system of obtaining various forms of position information, such as with a navigational device, and a method of searching POIs or items associated with POIs based on a rating scale, in order to find the most preferred POI or item, and using various search criteria selected by the user, software or hardware application, or the like. This method allows users to search for desirable POIs using various spatial search methods, such as the ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’, ‘Aggregate Average Population Rating Search’, ‘Personal—Favorites Rating Search’, or ‘Similar User-Rating Search’.
In one embodiment, the ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’ is based on the selection of a specific category or sub-category according to a user's set of preferences, such as searching for nearby Italian food with an overall rating of 32 or better (given a total scale of 40). In another embodiment, the ‘Personal—Favorites Rating Search’ allows users to compile and store their own personal ratings for various POIs in various user defined formats, such as personalized folders, which can be stored locally on the mobile device and/or remotely on the online networked rating search engine server. This enables a user to use his or her POI rating information both locally and remotely, such as when on travel, as the subset of POIs on which to perform a search, or as a ranking system that affects the indexing of displayed search results. In another embodiment, a user traveling in an unfamiliar area may want to use his or her preferred ratings when searching a specific area for a favorite restaurant chain or franchise. Should an exact match not be found, the user may then search the unfamiliar area for the nearest fast food restaurant that is similar to the user's favorite fast food restaurants in the user's local familiar area that are the highest-rated by the user. In another embodiment, the ‘Personal—Favorites Rating Search’ allows users to use their core set of POIs as a subset from which to search for the nearest POI, such that POIs that the users have not previously rated are not included in the search. Both POI sets, the user's core set of POIs as well as the complete set of POIs, can be searched upon, and when the search results are displayed, the POIs can be indexed by two methods. The search results can be indexed with more weight on the user's own ratings, such as a displayed result that ranks first a POI that the user has rated 95% in the display index and the aggregate user population rated 90%, and ranks second a POI that the aggregate user population rated 98% and the user rated less than 95% or not at all. Conversely, the search results can also be indexed with more weight on the aggregate user population rating, rather than the user's own personal ratings as in the previous example, so that the POIs' indices in the previous example are reversed.
The ‘Aggregate Average Population Rating Search’ consists of the average user ratings compiled for various top-level categorical searches. In one embodiment, the average user ratings for the best restaurant in a given area uses the base of the global community of users all having rated various POIs within the overall category and area, and can be used to search for the best-rated restaurant. For example, the best overall restaurant in a given area, which includes all types of restaurants (i.e. all restaurant sub-categories, such as Seafood, Asian, Italian, Indian, etc.), would display the indexed response of the overall best-rated restaurants in the user-defined area, regardless of subcategory, such as cuisine.
In another embodiment, the ‘Similar User Rating Search’ allows users to correlate their own preferred POI information with the complete compiled user-rating database, thus providing the best match of unknown POIs that the user would most probably prefer. In one embodiment, the search will match a searcher's rating history with those of users that on average have similar ratings for various categories previously rated by the searcher. The search then compiles a new subset of users that have similar ratings for the POIs that the searcher has previously rated or identified, and can then extrapolate POIs that the searcher has not rated should the searcher seek POI rating information for unknown POIs in a given area based on the searcher's position information. In one embodiment, a user that typically stays at one specific type of hotel, while on travel, may find that his/her favorite or typical hotel is not available or nearby. Thus, utilizing this form of search would enable a user to compare his/her own personal preferences with people of similar personal preferences that have rated various POIs unknown to the user initiating the search. The user is now able to utilize a POI rating search for unknown POIs based on his/her known preferences, thereby helping to narrow down the search to specific POIs that are unknown to the user, but that the user would probably like.
The embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems for enabling a navigational device to search, rate, and navigate to various POIs from a navigational device's current position. The POI spatial rating search allows users to search for desired POIs based on a specified rating metric. In one embodiment, a user may want to find the closest seafood restaurant that is generally most popular with users that have previously rated such restaurants in the area. Additionally, that user may want to have real-time driving directions to the desired POI of interest, where the driving directions take into consideration street speed limits, traffic information, and street turn restrictions.
The present invention also provides a method and system for allowing users to rate specific POIs based on their current location and various rating categories, such as quality of service or décor, or average price per entrée. In one embodiment, a user that has visited a POI can rate the POI based on the aforementioned rating categories, such as various quantitative factors or user experiences including décor, service, food, location, etc., or based on various pricing structures, such as the estimated cost of the POI service, average restaurant meal price, or a typical amusement park gate fee. Additionally, the system can prevent users from rating POIs that are outside of their current location. This prevents a user from rating a specific POI chain or franchise based on a particular experience at a local branch. Users would be able to update their rating for any POI after they have entered a particular rating, regardless of their current location.
The present invention is preferably functional with or without a real-time network connection to an Online Database and Application Rating Server Search Engine (ODARSSE). When there is no network connection possible, a local version of the ODARSSE can be loaded onto the device to enable such searches. This local version of the ODARSSE is known as the Local Database and Application Rating Search Engine (LDARSE). In one embodiment, a user can specify an area, such as a city, town, county, state, etc., that they expect to be traveling within. This allows the user to download data specific to a given region that enables a standalone spatial search engine without the need for real-time network connectivity. The only caveat is that the data that is used to calculate POI searches may not be current or may be outdated. In one embodiment, the user would download the data necessary for the local search engine by means of a CD-ROM, data file, or hot synching operation with a local computing device, which can be connected to the Internet and thus the ODARSSE. Additionally, the user would still be able to rate specific POIs, and that rating information could be incorporated into the user's personal searches, but would not be collectively available to other users until such data is transferred to the ODARSSE via a network connection. When connected to the ODARSSE, the system provides authentication and authorization protocols to establish that a user is genuine and to verify the level of authority each user is granted, such as for differentiating services provided by the ODARSSE.
The system provides various methods for obtaining driving directions to any specific POI and delivering them to the user, such as by a graphical user interface display or by using a speech interface device, or other various interfaces. In one embodiment, after a user has searched a specific POI with some preferred indexed rating, the user may obtain driving directions, or other navigable directions, such as azimuth, elevation, and distance directions, to the desired POI. This is possible via either a networked connection to the ODARSSE, or using a standalone navigational device with a local storage device, such as a memory device or hard disk.
When a user wants to locate a preferred POI for a given location, using a navigational device 101, a user can search various POIs based on specified preferred search criteria and the user's position information. When a user initiates a search, as illustrated in
After a preferred search method has been identified, as illustrated in
After the user selects 406 the sub-category list, again typically using an icon pointer 901, that information is loaded into local memory 407. The system then displays 408 the appropriate distance search region, which can be stored as a user preference to avoid its selection every time a search is done. The search distance display 904 shows various forms of search criteria, such as various search radius distances, zip code search, city-town search, or neighboring city-town search, as well as various user inputted radiuses and user-described zones. Once again, this information is typically selected using an icon pointer 901, such as a mouse, but can be done using other forms of user input, such as a keyboard. Once the region information has been selected 409, the search region information is loaded into local memory 410 for later use. The system then displays 411 the search sort order 905 for listing the returned search results, such as by 1). Highest Rating, 2). Distance From Current Location, or 3). Alphabetically, amongst others sorting preferences. The user preferably then selects 412 the preferred method to sort the return search response, which is typically done using an icon pointer 901. Additionally, this information can be also stored in the user's preferences information or dynamically changed once the search information has been returned. The indexed sort information is also loaded into local memory 413 for later use.
Once the appropriate search criteria is selected by the user, the system checks 500, as illustrated in
Since the data can exist both locally and over the network, as shown in
The search results can be displayed 607 in many formats, including, for example, audio format. As shown in
In one embodiment, for each indexed POI, the results preferably provide the user with the POI's name 1001, telephone number 1005, professional critic's review 1006, individual user's reviews 1004, and a link to initiate a ‘door-to-door’ driving direction calculation 1101 with display 1100 (
While the search results display 1000 is active, the system is searching for events that occur, such as various link click events or an exit event. Some of the most important links are the ‘Get Driving Directions’ 1003, ‘Telephone Number’ 1005, and ‘Exit Screen’ 1008 events. This event loop is illustrated in
In one embodiment, after a desired POI has been chosen and a user requires real-time driving directions to such desired POI, the system will calculate the necessary driving directions, as illustrated in
If the navigational device has network connectivity, the device preferably incorporates both the current position and remote position information 707 in the calculation of a route by the network server system (ODARSSE 107). Additionally, further preference information 708 can be included in the route query, such as real-time traffic information, or street turn restrictions. The system then sends 705 all of the appropriate information necessary for generating a route to the ODARSSE 107 across the network. The information is then displayed 711 to the user, in real-time, on a GUI display appropriate for the specific client device that initiated the search. The system then determines 712 if the navigational device has reached the desired POI by correlating its current position information 702 with the POI position information 605 or 602. If they are the same 712, then the user has reached the destination POI, the route has been completed, and the system starts over. If they are not the same, the system then starts the route loop over 701 based on an event change.
When there is no network availability, the system preferably computes 706 the route using locally cached data 709 and the current position information 702 with the POI position information 605 or 602, in addition to certain route preferences 708. The route calculation can use the route preferences 708 incorporating real-time traffic updates only when network connectivity is available. Real-time traffic information is not incorporated in the route calculation when there is no network connectivity.
As illustrated in
As shown in
The system is also capable of finding POIs based on ratings and incorporating the current route information 1303 that the navigational device is using to index search results for optimal overall route efficiency, such as shown in
When a device is traveling a pre-defined route, the system identifies if a current route is enabled 1400 (see
The system preferably periodically checks 1408 to verify if the device has reached the desired POI, in which such a calculation often involves the incorporation of positional error information, which may be produced by multi-path error or Selectivity Availability (SA) error sometimes present in GPS receiver systems, and its correlation with the POI's location information and the navigational device's position information. If the device is not at the desired POI location, the loop starts again by updating the sub-route information and position information function 1406, or else the loop terminates since the navigational device has reached the desired POI location. The same function is used to return to the desired route, except the destination is the closest point on the pre-defined route, and utilizes current map information and real-time route information to calculate the route. Once the navigational device has returned to the pre-defined route, the previous function executes as normal until its desired route destination has been reached.
Various forms of searches are disclosed for the invention including, without limitation, Best Categorical Rating Search, Aggregate Average Population Rating Search, Personal—Favorites Rating Search, and Similar User Rating Search.
The ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’ allows the searching of various forms of ratings for a given end-category, such as a sub-category or category with no more sub-categories beneath itself. For instance, the restaurant category has various sub-categories beneath it, such as American (New), American (Traditional), Argentinean, Armenian, Asian, etc. These subcategories (e.g., Pizza) are defined as end-categories. Another category, such as Typewriters (i.e., Typewriter Stores) does not have a sub category beneath it, and is thus defined as an end-category. Additionally, various forms of quality factors are referenced for various forms of categories and sub-categories.
These rating quality factors preferably include décor, service, food, location (e.g., surrounding area condition), and various pricing structures, such as the estimated cost of the POI service, such as an average restaurant meal price or typical amusement park gate fee. The ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’ allows a user to search these end-categories based on various quality factors. In one embodiment, quality factors may include: Overall Customer Experience; Décor; Service (Quality & Speed); Food Quality; Surrounding Location (Cleanliness, Waterfront Location, Scenic View, etc.); Cost (such as Very Expensive ($$$$$), Expensive ($$$$), Moderate ($$$), Average ($$), Inexpensive ($)); Price Range ($50+$30-$40, $20-$30, $10-$20, under $10. Etc.); Atmosphere—Dress Code (such as Formal, Casual, Sports, Live Music, etc.); and others.
A user preferably initiates 1500 the ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’ and search area, as illustrated in
Where SR=Specific Rating; CR=Critic Rating; NoU=Number of Users that Rated POI Quality Factor (Range=[0,100]); AUR=Average User Ratings.
Thus, a Critic's Rating would hold more weight when the Number of Users that have rated the given quality factor for the POI is small, but as the number grows, the critic's rating is less weighted and the users' average rating is more heavily weighted. The system then returns the specific rating results to the user 1504. The search can also incorporate the critic's rating information, regardless of the number of users in the aggregate ratings count, to provide a better method of rating various POIs.
Additionally, the spatial searches for various search methods can incorporate many techniques. In one embodiment, a radial search using the ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’ method involves the location of the user initiating the search, the category to search within, the radius of the search window, and the various quality factors needed to perform the search. For instance, in one embodiment, a user wants to search for a seafood restaurant that has an overall average user rating of 37 or better within a given radius, where the origin of the search is the user's current position. As illustrated in
The ‘Aggregate Average Population Rating Search’ is similar to the ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’, except that the end-category is not defined. This implies that sub-categories beneath the main top-level category, such as restaurants, need not be defined or selected. For the example of restaurant categories, a user would not need to specify what type of cuisine (i.e. Italian, American, etc.) the restaurant should serve. The search process is similar to that of the ‘Best Categorical Rating Search’, as illustrated in
The ‘Personal—Favorites Rating Search’ allows users search within their customized POI favorites list using the various other search methods, such as the ‘Aggregate Average Population Rating Search’. Users can save various favorite POIs into various customized personal categories, or all grouped together, depending on the user's preferences. This search allows users to compile and store their own personal ratings for various POIs in various user-defined formats, such as personalized folders, which can be stored locally on the mobile device and/or remotely on the online networked rating search engine server. This enables a user to use his/her preferences both locally and remotely, such as when on travel. As with any POI search or identification, once a POI has been identified, its information can be saved for later use.
Since the new favorite POI, named ‘Divine Cucina’, has been added to the favorite list 1604 under the Favorite Restaurant folder, the user is able to get, using the icon pointer 1605, various information about a specific POI as shown in
Additionally, with any search a user can add reviews, such as personal, critic's, or other users' reviews to their personal storage area, either locally or on the network server, for retrieval at any time.
The ‘Similar User Rating Search’ allows users to use their own preferred POI information, compiled and correlated with the complete user-rating database, to search for the best match of unfamiliar POIs that the user would most probably prefer. In one embodiment, the search method is similar to the other search methods, except that a user is searching for unknown POIs that the user would, with a strong likelihood, prefer, in which the search is based on their previous rated or favorite POIs. The efficacy of this search increases as the number of personally-rated POIs increases, such that having 10 or more previously-rated POIs per category will aid in this search method, but having only 1 or more previously-rated POIs is preferably required for this search method.
As illustrated in
For instance, in Line 17.3 of
Every user that uses the search system, such as ‘User—1’ 1700, as shown in
The present invention allows users to store personal note information about any POI, such as a franchise or chain, for their review anytime. A user can update this note information by means of any computing device, such as a personal computer, and it is not limited to only navigational devices. The note information can be stored locally on the device or uploaded and stored on the network for retrieval from any location and on any device. As illustrated in
The ISP 1810 preferably has a connection 1809 to the Internet, Intranet, or Extranet 1800 and then is connected 1804 to the ISP 1803 that is connected 1802 to the database server 1801. Therefore, any user can store local POI note information, or, by using a network connection and various protocols, such as TCP/IP or UDP, store, read, or update note information on the database server 1801. The note information for various POIs is defined 1813 as shown in
Users can be apprised that they are near any POI based on various zone boundaries, such as a radial or box-boundary defined area of either the user or the POI. As illustrated in
For instance, Joyce's Restaurant 1915 is the first POI 1907, still within range 1912, to be triggered and displayed 1913 & 1914, followed by the Chart House 1916 & 1909, Lacie Park 1917 & 1908, and Arroyo Park Golf Course 1918 & 1910. Note that the display 1913 shows a recently triggered POI 1906 in the history list 1919 as Houston's Restaurant 1920. Additionally, each triggered response 1915 & 1916 & 1917 & 1918 & 1920 can be activated by, for instance, an icon pointer 1921 to get additional information about the POI, such as Favorite associated information, driving directions, etc.
For any given POI, as chosen in a variety of methods including the various aforementioned search methods, a user can create an optimal route based on POI location or POI location and order. In one embodiment, a user can select various POIs, such as the ‘Personal—Favorites Rating Search’ provides, to be incorporated into a route (see
It should be noted that the present invention may be embodied in forms other than the preferred embodiments described above without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The specification contained herein provides sufficient disclosure for one skilled in the art to implement the various embodiments of the present invention, including the preferred embodiment, which should be considered in all aspect as illustrative and not restrictive; all changes or alternatives that fall within the meaning and range or equivalency of the claim are intended to be embraced within.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/947,719, entitled “Point of Interest Spatial Rating Search Method and System,” filed on Nov. 29, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,014,939; which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/450,171, entitled “Point of Interest Spatial Rating Search,” filed on Jun. 8, 2006, now U.S. Pat. 7,321,826; which in turn is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/222,450, entitled “Point of Interest Spatial Rating Search Method and System,” filed on Aug. 16, 2002, now U.S. Pat. 7,082,365; which in turn claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. provisional application No. 60/313,010 filed Aug. 16, 2001, all four of which are specifically incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4939662 | Nimura | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5389934 | Kass | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5557254 | Johnson | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5636122 | Shah | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5684951 | Goldman | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5689269 | Norris | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5689809 | Grube | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5727057 | Emery | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5774824 | Streit | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5801700 | Ferguson | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5802492 | DeLorme | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5904727 | Prahakaran | May 1999 | A |
| 5926118 | Hayashida | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5944768 | Ito | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5948040 | DeLorme | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5982301 | Ohta | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6049718 | Stewart | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6084951 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091957 | Larkins | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6138003 | Kingdon | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6169516 | Watanabe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182006 | Meek | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182227 | Blair | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185426 | Alperovich | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6188957 | Bechtolsheim | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6204844 | Fumarolo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208934 | Bechtolsheim | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6226367 | Smith | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6317684 | Roeseler | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321158 | DeLorme | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6331825 | Ladner | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6353664 | Cannon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366782 | Fumarolo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6366856 | Johnson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377210 | Moore | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6415224 | Wako | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6441752 | Fomukong | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442384 | Shah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442391 | Johansson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6459782 | Bedrodian | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466788 | Carlsson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6529143 | Mikkola | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6539080 | Bruce | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6563824 | Bhatia | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571174 | Rigazio | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6621423 | Cooper | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6640185 | Yokota | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6643516 | Stewart | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6665715 | Houri | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6674849 | Froeberg | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6721716 | Gross | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6766174 | Kenyon | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6775371 | Elsey | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6801850 | Wolfson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6810405 | LaRue | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6816782 | Walters | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6819919 | Tanaka | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829532 | Obradovich | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6839630 | Sakamoto | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6842696 | Silvester | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6885874 | Grube | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6895329 | Wolfson | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6898516 | Pechatnikov | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6910818 | McLoone | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6925603 | Naito | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934705 | Tu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6944535 | Iwata | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6970871 | Rayburn | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 7058506 | Kawase | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7082365 | Sheha et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7089110 | Pechatnikov | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7142196 | Connor | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7142205 | Chithambaram | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7167187 | Scott | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7202801 | Chou | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7266376 | Nakagawa | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7321826 | Sheha et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7565157 | Ortega | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7653544 | Bradley | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7739033 | Murata | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7751614 | Funakura | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7774003 | Ortega | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7822823 | Jhanji | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 8014939 | Sheha et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 20010015756 | Wilcock | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010016849 | Squibbs | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020032036 | Nakajima | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052786 | Kim | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059201 | Work | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069239 | Katada | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086683 | Kohar | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169539 | Menard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030014487 | Iwakawa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036949 | Kaddeche | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045327 | Kobayashi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030061211 | Shultz | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078054 | Okuda | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125064 | Koskinen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126250 | Jhanji | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149526 | Zhou | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008225 | Cambell | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186880 | Yamamoto | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040204829 | Endo | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229595 | Laursen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050062636 | Conway | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125148 | Van Buer | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219067 | Chung | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050242168 | Tesavis | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019724 | Bahl | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268120 | Funakura | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004461 | Bathina | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070032244 | Counts | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083911 | Madden | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208687 | O'Conor | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080077324 | Hatano | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080129475 | Breed | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220747 | Ashkenazi | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288166 | Onishi | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090113346 | Wickramasuriya | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090328163 | Preece | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100004993 | Troy | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042592 | Stolz | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100268848 | Maurya | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120011137 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60313010 | Aug 2001 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11450171 | Jun 2006 | US |
| Child | 11947719 | US | |
| Parent | 10222450 | Aug 2002 | US |
| Child | 11450171 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11947719 | Nov 2007 | US |
| Child | 13137639 | US |
