1. Field of Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to improvements in methods of and apparatus for checking out products in point-of-sale (POS) environments.
2. Brief Description of the State of Knowledge in the Art
The use of bar code symbols for product and article identification is well known in the art. Presently, various types of bar code symbol scanners have been developed for reading bar code symbols at retail points of sale (POS).
Also, over the years, electronic article surveillance (EAS) methods have been developed to prevent shoplifting in retail stores or pilferage of books from libraries. Special tags are fixed to merchandise or books. These tags are removed or deactivated by the clerks when the item is properly bought or checked out at a POS station. At the exits of the store, a detection system sounds an alarm or otherwise alerts the staff when it senses “active” tags. For high-value goods that are to be manipulated by the patrons, wired alarm clips may be used instead of tags.
Currently, several major types of electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems have been developed, namely: magnetic-based EAS systems, also known as magneto-harmonic; acousto-magnetic based EAS systems, also known as magnetostrictive; radio-frequency based EAS systems; and microwave-based EAS systems.
In magnetic-based EAS systems, the tags are made of a strip of amorphous metal (metglas), which has a very low magnetic saturation value. Except for permanent tags, this strip is also lined with a strip of ferromagnetic material with a moderate coercive field (magnetic “hardness”). Detection is achieved by sensing harmonics and sum or difference signals generated by the non-linear magnetic response of the material under a mixture of low-frequency (in the 10 Hz to 1000 Hz range) magnetic fields. When the ferromagnetic material is magnetized, it biases the amorphous metal strip into saturation, where it no longer produces harmonics. Deactivation of these tags is therefore done with magnetization. Activation requires demagnetization. This type of EAS system is suitable for items in libraries since the tags can be deactivated when items are borrowed and re-activated upon return. It is also suitable for low value goods in retail stores, due to the small size and very low cost of the tags.
These EAS systems are similar to magnetic-based EAS systems, in that the tags are made of two strips of metal, namely: a strip of magnetostrictive, ferromagnetic amorphous metal, and a strip of a magnetically semi-hard metallic strip, which is used as a biasing magnet (to increase signal strength) and to allow deactivation. These strips are not bound together, but are free to oscillate mechanically. Amorphous metals are used in such systems due to their good magneto-elastic coupling, which imply that they can efficiently convert magnetic energy to mechanical vibrations. The detectors for such tags emit periodic tonal bursts at about 58 kHz, the same resonance frequency as of the amorphous strips [3]. This causes the strip to vibrate longitudinally by magnetostriction, and to continue to oscillate after the burst is over. The vibration causes a change in magnetization in the amorphous strip, which induces an AC voltage in the receiver antenna. If this signal meets the required parameters (correct frequency, repetition etc.) the alarm is activated.
When the semi-hard magnet is magnetized, the tag is activated. The magnetized strip makes the amorphous strip respond much more strongly to the detectors, because the DC magnetic field given off by the strip offsets the magnetic anisotropy within the amorphous metal. The tag can also be deactivated by demagnetizing the strip, making the response small enough so that the detectors will not detect it. These tags are thicker than magnetic tags and are thus seldom used for books. However they are relatively inexpensive and have better detection rates (fewer false positives and false negatives) than magnetic tags.
The Series 304 RF EAS label is essentially an LC tank circuit that has a resonance peak anywhere from 1.75 MHz to 9.5 MHz. The most popular frequency is 8.2 MHz. Sensing is achieved by sweeping around the resonant frequency and detecting the dip. Deactivation for 8.2 MHz label tags is achieved by detuning the circuit by partially destroying the capacitor. This is done by submitting the tag to a strong electromagnetic field at the resonant frequency that will induce voltages exceeding the capacitor's breakdown voltage, which is artificially reduced by puncturing the tags.
Microwave Based EAS systems
These permanent tags are made of a non-linear element (a diode) coupled to one microwave and one electrostatic antenna. At the exit, one antenna emits a low-frequency (about 100 kHz) field, and another one emits a microwave field. The tag acts as a mixer reemitting a combination of signals from both fields. This modulated signal triggers the alarm. These tags are permanent and somewhat costly. They are mostly used in clothing stores.
Over the past decade, Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology has become increasingly popular in retail environments. A primary reason for this increase in popularity is it allows for the unique identification of product items, and the writing of data to RFID tags or labels, allowing the collection of item-level intelligence provider great visibility. RFID technology uses communication via radio waves to exchange data between a reader and an electronic tag attached to an object, for the purpose of identification and tracking Some RFID tags can be read from several meters away and beyond the line of sight of the reader. The application of bulk reading enables an almost parallel reading of tags.
Radio-frequency identification involves the use of interrogators (also known as readers), and tags (also known as labels) applied to objects. Most RFID tags contain at least two components. One component is an integrated circuit for storing and processing information, modulating and demodulating a radio-frequency (RF) signal, and other specialized functions. The other component is an antenna for receiving and transmitting the signal.
There are three types of RFID tags: passive RFID tags, which have no power source and require an external electromagnetic field to initiate a signal transmission; active RFID tags, which contain a battery and can transmit signals once an external source (‘Interrogator’) has been successfully identified; and battery-assisted passive (BAP) RFID tags, which require an external source to wake up, but have a significantly higher forward link capability providing greater range.
Today, there are UHF-based RFID hang tags, compliant with the EPC Gen 2 standard, that can be clipped or otherwise embedded within apparel items, and tracked quickly so that all the information about the garment (e.g. the product name, model number, place of origin to its location, etc) can be detected by an RFID (UHF) antenna and displayed on the host computer. The UHF EPC Gen 2 hangtag offers password protection to protect important data in the RFID tag. Using EPC Gen 2 tags, it is possible to better manage processes along the supply chain, in the distribution center, and at the point of sale. Currently, RFID tag products are sold by Checkpoint Systems, and Sensormatic/TYCO, and other vendors described at http://www.rfidtags.com
In an effort to exercise greater control over its supply chain operations, some large retailers, including Walmart, are seeking to require its vendors to apply low-cost RFID tags, encoded with the Electronic Product Code (EPC), to their products in accordance with the EPCglobal Tag Data Standard.
Also, some retail-based systems are now supporting dual or hybrid EAS-RFID tags, that include both (i) an EAS component for item-level security and (ii) an RFID component for real-time inventory control (i.e. visibility). The EAS component, which includes an electromagnetically detectable element, helps prevent theft in the retail store environment. The Item-level RFID component, which stores an electronic product code (EPC) within the tag, drives item level information/intelligence back into the supply chain—to improve existing store operations, increase product availability, and enhance the customer shopping experience.
While EAS tags, RFID tags and hybrid EAS-RFID tags (i.e. Electro-Magnetically Sensible or EMS tags) are often applied to products at the retail side of the value chain, EAS and RFID tags can be applied to products at the source, i.e. the supplier or manufacturer. This is called “source tagging” which, for the retailer, eliminates the labor expense needed to apply the EMS tags themselves, and reduces the time between receipt of merchandise and when the merchandise is ready for sale. For the supplier, the main benefit of source tagging is the preservation of the retail packaging aesthetics by easing the application of security tags within product packaging. Source tagging allows the EM tags to be concealed and more difficult to remove.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,172,123; 7,170,414; 6,788,205; 6,764,010 and 6,942,145 describe a number of POS-based checkout systems employing primarily EAS tag deactivation methods.
However, despite recent advances in EAS, RFID and hybrid EAS/RFID systems, shoplifters today can still easily steal an item by the ‘replacing’ or “switching” the barcode of a high-priced item with the barcode taken from a low-priced item, during product checkout operations at the POS station. This can be accomplished in one of several possible ways.
One way to switch prices at the POS station is by taking both a high-priced item and a low priced item to the self-checkout, or a cooperating cashier, and reading the barcode label on the low priced item, while simultaneously passing the high-priced item into the shopping bag (i.e. sweet-hearting).
Another way to switch prices at the POS station is to remove the barcode label from the low-priced item, and place it on the high-priced item, so that when the high-priced item is scanned, the low-priced item barcode will be scanned and read by the POS station.
In both cases described above, the thief is only charged for the low-priced item, and the retail merchant sustains a loss.
While U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,374,092 to Acosta et al., 7,495,564 to Harold et al. and 6,788,205 to Mason et al. each disclose the deployment of EAS tag deactivation coils (i.e. antennas) at the POS station, so that a product's EAS tag can be automatically deactivated upon the successful reading of its barcode label, such POS-based EAS systems fail to provide any way of preventing the above-described theft schemes described above.
Therefore, there is still remains a great need in the art for an improved POS-based bar code symbol reading checkout system which is capable of supporting improved levels of electronic article surveillance at the POS station, while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of prior art systems and methodologies.
Accordingly, a primary object of the present disclosure is to provide an improved POS-based checkout system and method that supports improved levels of product checkout and electronic article surveillance while products are being purchased in POS environments, while avoiding the shortcomings and drawbacks of prior art systems and methodologies.
Another object is to provide a POS-based system for carrying out a two-factor authentication process which involves the use of first and second factors for authentication purposes at the POS checkout system, wherein the first factor is a product identification code classification (i.e. special or non-special) applied to each product being sold in the retail environment, and wherein the second factor is a product security code classification (e.g. special or non-special) applied to each product being sold in the retail environment, and is used to carry out a security function in the retail environment.
Another object is to provide a POS-based checkout system that supports a two-factor authentication process using a database, a product identification code reading subsystem, a product security code reading subsystem, a data processing subsystem, and an information indication module.
Another object is to provided such a POS-based system, wherein the database is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that maintains information relating to the price of coded products offered for said retail environment and scanned at the POS-based checkout system, and also relating to whether or not any scanned coded product has been classified as a special product and applied a special security code, or a non-special product and applied a non-special security code, to assist in carrying out a two-factor authentication process supported at the POS-based checkout system, where coded products are purchased and theft activity might be pursued.
Another object is to provided such a POS-based system, wherein the product identification code reading subsystem is operably connected to the database, for reading product identification codes on coded products that are passed through a point of sale (POS), and generating code data for each product identification code read for the purpose of identifying the coded product, and determining the purchase price of the coded product.
Another object is to provide such a POS-based system, wherein the security classification code reading subsystem is operably connected to the database, for detecting product security codes (e.g. EAS tags, RFID tags, etc) passing through the POS during product checkout operations.
Another object is to provided such a POS-based system, wherein the data processing subsystem for processing data and determining whether or not each coded product being purchased satisfies the two-factor authentication process, and wherein the compliance indication module generates an indication when the two-factor authentication process is breached during the checkout of a product being purchased at the POS-based checkout system.
Another object is to provide a POS-based checkout system that supports a two-factor authentication process, wherein the first factor (i.e. product identification code) is realized as a unique bar code symbol on each product, while the second factor (i.e. product security code) is realized an EAS tag or label assigned to each high priced or high-security-risk class of products sold within a retail environment.
Another object is to provide a POS-based checkout system that supports a two-factor authentication process, where the first factor (i.e. product identification code) is realized as an EPC-encoded RFID tag or label (i.e. electronic code), provide product level identification to the POS-based checkout system, while the second factor (i.e. product security code) is realized an EAS tag or label assigned to each high priced or high-security-risk class of products sold within a retail environment.
Another object is to provide a POS-based checkout system that supports a two-factor authentication process, wherein the first factor (i.e. product identification code) is realized as a unique bar code symbol on each product, while the second factor (i.e. product security code) is realized an RFID tag or label (with appropriate coding) applied to high-priced products involved in the two-factor authentication process.
Another object is to provide such a POS-based checkout system equipped with a bar code symbol reader and an EAS tag detector and deactivator at the POS station so that the EAS tag detector can electromagnetically probe the area around the bar code reader for EAS tags when the bar code reader reads a bar code label on a product being scanned at the POS station.
Another object is to provide such a POS-based checkout system that automatically generates visual and/or audible security alerts (i.e. messages) to the checkout operator whenever the checkout system automatically detects a failure (i.e. breach) of the two-factor authentication process, based on real-time analysis of the product identification code and security code records maintained in a database supporting the POS-based checkout system.
Another object is to provide a POS-based checkout system that supports a two-factor authentication process, which reduces the likelihood of successful “sweet-hearting” attempted between a cashier and a customer in a retail checkout station.
These and other objects will become apparent hereinafter and in the Claims appended hereto.
In order to more fully understand the objects of the present disclosure, the following Detailed Description of the Illustrative Embodiments should be read in conjunction with the accompanying figure Drawings in which:
FIG. 1A1 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system of the present disclosure, illustrating Scenario No. 1, where a product has been assigned to the “special” product class (implying the product requires “special” security and/or handling measures) and where a special bar code symbol (e.g. label) is applied to the special product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is applied to the special product and detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication compliance signal;
FIG. 1A2 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, illustrating Scenario No. 2, when a product has been assigned to the special product class, and where a special bar code symbol is applied to a special product and detected at POS station, while a security tag is not applied to the special product or detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal;
FIG. 1A3 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, illustrating Scenario No. 3, when a product has been assigned to the special product class, and where a non-special bar code symbol is applied to a special product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is applied to the special product and detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal;
FIG. 1A4 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, illustrating Scenario No. 4, when a product has been assigned to the special product class, and where a non-special bar code symbol is applied to a special product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is not applied to the product or detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system incorrectly generates a two-factor authentication compliance signal (because the two-factor authentication process has been successfully thwarted by the thief);
FIG. 1A5 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, illustrating Scenario No. 5, when a product has been assigned to the “non-special” product class (implying the product does not require “special” security and/or handling measures) and where a non-special bar code symbol (e.g. label) is applied to the non-special product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is not applied to the product or detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication compliance signal;
FIG. 1A6 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, illustrating Scenario No. 6, when a product has been assigned to the non-special product class, and where a special bar code symbol is applied to a “non-special” product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is applied to the non-special product and detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system incorrectly generating a two-factor authentication compliance signal, as a result of store error, which may be detected by the customer in the event they believe they are being charged too much for the item;
FIG. 1A7 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, illustrating Scenario No. 7, when a product has been assigned to the non-special product class, and where a special bar-code symbol is applied to the non-special product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is not applied to the product or detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system correctly generate a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal;
FIG. 1A8 is a schematic representation of the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, illustrating Scenario No. 8, when a product has been assigned to the non-special product class, and where a non-special bar code symbol is applied to a non-special product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is applied to the product and detected at the POS station, and the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal;
FIGS. 1B1 and 1B2, taken together, present a flow chart describing the primary steps carried out during the method of two-factor authentication using the POS-based checkout system illustrated in FIGS. 1A1 through 1A8;
FIGS. 2G1 and 2G2, taken together, presents a flow chart setting forth the major steps in the two-factor authentication process carried out at the retail POS checkout system of the first illustrative embodiment shown in
FIGS. 3E1 and 3E2, taken together, presents a flow chart setting forth the major steps in the two-factor authentication process carried out at the retail POS checkout station of the second illustrative embodiment;
FIGS. 6A1 and 6A2, taken together, show a schematic block diagram describing the major system components of the hand-supportable POS checkout system illustrated in
Referring to the figures in the accompanying Drawings, the various illustrative embodiments of the apparatus and methodologies will be described in great detail, wherein like elements will be indicated using like reference numerals.
FIGS. 1 through 1A8 illustrate the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a point of sale (POS) in a retail environment using a generalized embodiment of the POS-based checkout system of the present disclosure. The two-factor authentication process involves the use of first and second factors for authentication purposes at POS checkout system where products are being purchased and theft activity might be pursued. The first factor is a product identification code (i.e. special or non-special classification) applied to each coded product being sold in the retail environment. The second factor is a product classification code (i.e. special or non-special classification) applied to each special product being sold in the retail environment, and is used to carry out a security function in the retail environment.
As shown, the product identification code reading subsystem is operably connected to the database, and reads product identification codes on coded products that are passed through a point of sale (POS), and generates code data for each product identification code read for the purpose of identifying each coded product, and determining the purchase price of the coded product. The product security code reading subsystem is also operably connected to the database, and detects security codes (e.g. special or non-special classification) passing through the POS during product checkout operations. The data processing subsystem processes product identification code data and security classification code data collected at the POS during product checkout operations, and determines whether or not each coded product satisfies the two-factor authentication process. The compliance indication module generates an indication of whether the product two-factor authentication process is breached during the checkout of each product being purchased at the POS-based checkout system.
In general, the two-factor authentication process and system of the present disclosure supports eight (8) unique scenarios described in detail below.
FIG. 1A1 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system of the present disclosure, operating in Scenario No. 1, where a product has been assigned to the “special” product class (implying the product requires “special” security and/or handling measures) and where a special bar code symbol (e.g. label) is applied to the special product and detected at the POS station, while a special security tag is applied to the special product and detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication compliance signal. This scenario describes to the situation where a special classified product is properly bar-coded and security tagged.
FIG. 1A2 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, operating in Scenario No. 2, where (i) a product has been assigned to the special product class, (ii) a special bar code symbol is applied to a special product and detected at POS station, and (iii) a security tag is not applied to the special product or detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal. This scenario describes to the situation where a special classified product is properly bar-coded but never had its security tag attached due to store error, or because the security tag was removed by a customer before presentation to the POS station.
FIG. 1A3 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, operating in Scenario No. 3, where (i) a product has been assigned to the special product class, (ii) a non-special bar code symbol is applied to a special product and detected at the POS station, and (iii) a special security tag is applied to the special product and detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal. This scenario describes to a potential theft situation where the bar code label on a special classified product has been altered by a customer, but who failed to remove its security tag.
FIG. 1A4 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, operating in Scenario No. 4, where (i) a product has been assigned to the special product class, (ii) a non-special bar code symbol is applied to a special product and detected at the POS station, and (iii) a special security tag is not applied to the product or detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system incorrectly generates a two-factor authentication compliance signal (because the two-factor authentication process has been successfully thwarted by the thief). This scenario describes the situation where a customer thief has defeated both authentication factors or where a special product has been improperly bar-coded and improperly security coded (i.e. tagged), and the two-factor authentication process has failed in error.
FIG. 1A5 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, operating in Scenario No. 5, where (i) a product has been assigned to the “non-special” product class (implying the product does not require “special” security and/or handling measures), (ii) a non-special bar code symbol (e.g. label) is applied to the non-special product and detected at the POS station, and (iii) a special security tag is not applied to the product or detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication compliance signal. This scenario describes to the situation where a non-special classified product is properly bar-coded and properly security coded (i.e. not tagged).
FIG. 1A6 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, operating in Scenario No. 6, where (i) a product has been assigned to the non-special product class, (ii) a special bar code symbol is applied to a “non-special” product and detected at the POS station, and (iii) a special security tag is applied to the non-special product and detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system incorrectly generates a two-factor authentication compliance signal. This scenario describes to the situation where a non-special classified product is improperly bar-coded and improperly security coded (i.e. tagged), but may be detected by the customer at the POS station (e.g. because the item price is apparent too high).
FIG. 1A7 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, operating in Scenario No. 7, where (i) a product has been assigned to the non-special product class, (ii) a special bar-code symbol is applied to the non-special product and detected at the POS station, and (iii) a special security tag is not applied to the product or detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal. This scenario describes to the situation where a non-special classified product is improperly bar-coded and properly security coded (i.e. not tagged), and the two-factor authentication process correctly generates a non-compliance signal.
FIG. 1A8 illustrates the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure being carried out at a POS in a retail environment using the POS-based checkout system, operating in Scenario No. 8, where (i) a product has been assigned to the non-special product class, (ii) a non-special bar code symbol is applied to a non-special product and detected at the POS station, and (iii) a special security tag is applied to the product and detected at the POS station. During this scenario, the POS checkout system correctly generates a two-factor authentication non-compliance signal. This scenario describes to the situation where a non-special classified product is properly bar-coded but improperly security tagged at the POS station, due to store error.
While the two-factor authentication process described above is not 100% fool proof, it does provide a superior way to detect POS theft detection, than provided by conventional 1-factor authentication techniques. Also, there are many possible ways of and means for implementing the two-factor authentication process described above at retail POS stations. Several different kinds of POS-based checkout systems with the capacity to carry out the two-factor authentication process above will be described in detail below.
In the illustrative embodiments, shown in
The flow chart set forth in FIGS. 1B1 and 1B2 describes the primary steps carried out during the method of two-factor authentication using the generalized POS-based checkout system illustrated in FIGS. 1A1 through 1A8.
As indicated at Block A in
As indicated at Block B in
As indicated at Block C, the method involves entering product identification code information into a database, identifying each special product and non-special product in the inventory.
As indicated at Block D, the method involves affixing a special security code to each special product.
As indicated at Block E, the method involves, for each coded product being purchased at the POS, using the product identification code reader to read the product identification code on each coded product passed through the POS, and simultaneously using the security code detector (i.e. product security code reader) to attempt to detect a special security code on the coded product passed through the POS.
As indicated at Block F, the method involves using the database to identify the coded product passed through the POS, and determining whether or not a special security code has been detected while a product identification code is read on each coded product being passed through the POS, and determining whether or not the coded product being checked out is in compliance with the two-factor authentication process.
As indicated at Block G, the logic presented in the table of
In the illustrative embodiments shown throughout
Preferably, the EAS tag detector and deactivator are integrated with the bar code symbol reader, and/or the RFID code reader, so that the two-factor authentication process is carried out in a transparent manner, unknown to customers and thieves within the retail environment. Each POS-based checkout system can be easily programmed and configured to carry out various illustrative embodiments of the two-factor POS checkout authentication process of the present disclosure, as required by any particular application. Such configurations provide flexibility in carrying out the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure.
In FIGS. 2 through 2F2, a retail point of sale (POS) checkout system of the first illustrative embodiment 1 is shown, employing: (i) digital-imaging techniques for reading bar code symbols 961, functioning as product identification codes, on products 960 presented at a POS station; (ii) electronic RFID reading/writing techniques for reading and writing to the memory of RFID tags 970 (and to the RFID component of hybrid RFID/EAS devices 972), functioning as product security codes, on products 960 presented at the POS station; and (iii) EAS tag detecting and deactivation techniques for detecting and deactivating EAS tags 971, functioning as product security codes, at the POS station, in accordance with the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure.
In FIGS. 3 through 3E2, a POS checkout system of the second illustrative embodiment 1′ is shown, employing: (i) laser-scanning techniques for reading bar code symbols, functioning as product identification codes, at a POS station; (ii) electronic RFID reading/writing techniques for reading and writing to the memory of RFID tags (and to the RFID component of hybrid RFID/EAS devices), functioning as product identification codes and/or product security codes, on products presented at the POS station; and (iii) EAS tag detecting and deactivation techniques for detecting and deactivating EAS tags, functioning as product security codes, at the POS station, in accordance with the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure.
In
In
In general, each of these retail POS-based systems 1, 1′, 1″ and 900 is particularly adapted for installation in a point of sale (POS) environment or station. Typically, the POS station includes a countertop-surface in which, or on which, the bar code symbol reading system can be installed and connected to a PC-based host system 91 and/or information processing and database (RDBMS) server 333, and other input/output devices 26, 27, 31, 35 and 36 as shown and described in greater detail below. However, the two-factor authentication based POS checkout system of the present disclosure can be installed in other types of retail POS environments, as shown in
In the first two illustrative embodiments, each POS-based checkout subsystem 1 and 1′ is equipped with audible and visual display capabilities, through an audible/visual information display module 300, shown in
EAS subsystem 28 (528) can be realized in any number of different ways using different types of EAS tag and system technologies described in the Background of Disclosure, including but not limited to: magnetic, also known as magneto-harmonic; acousto-magnetic, also known as magnetostrictive; radio frequency; and microwave electronic article surveillance technologies. In the illustrative embodiments, magneto-harmonic based EAS tag technology is used to illustrate the principles of the present disclosure, but it is understood that other types of EAS tag technologies can be used with excellent results.
While the complete two-factor authentication operation of the POS-based checkout system 1 is described in FIGS. 1A1 through 1A8, it will be helpful to briefly describe below operation of the POS-based checkout system in terms of its particular equipment.
For example, during Scenario No. 1, indicated in FIG. 1A2, when the bar code symbol reader and/or RFID code reader reads a product identification (bar) code symbol or label on a product for a high-priced (i.e. special) product, and does not detect the EAS tag of a high-priced product (i.e. assigned “special” product security code) at the POS-based station, then the POS checkout system of the illustrative embodiment automatically generates an audible and/or visual alert for the cashier or management, to recognize and take proper action in accordance with the policies set for an event of non-compliance of two-factor authentication process (i.e. due to store management failing to attach a special product security code, e.g. EAS tag, to the special classified product).
During Scenario No. 1A3, when the bar code reader and/or RFID code reader reads a product identification (bar) code for a low-priced or low-security (i.e. non-special) product, and the product security code detector detects the EAS tag of a high-priced or high-security (i.e. special) product at the POS station, then the POS-based checkout system of the illustrative embodiment automatically generates an audible and/or visual alert for the cashier, or management, to recognize and take proper action in accordance with the policies set for an event of non-compliance with the two-factor authentication process (i.e. due to a customer/thief removing the high-priced bar code label from a high-priced special product, but failing to remove the security tag).
Whenever the checkout system automatically detects a failure (i.e. breach) of the two-factor authentication process defined by the table of
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in the system diagram of
The primary function of each coplanar illumination and imaging station 15A through 15F is to capture digital linear (1D) images or narrow-area images along the field of view (FOV) of its coplanar illumination and imaging planes, using laser or LED-based illumination, depending on the system design, as taught in Applicants' U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,898,184 and 7,490,774. These captured digital images are then buffered, and decode-processed using linear (1D) type image capturing and processing based bar code reading algorithms, or can be assembled together and buffered to reconstruct 2D images for decode-processing using 1D/2D image processing based bar code reading techniques, as taught in Applicants' U.S. Pat. No. 7,028,899 B2, incorporated herein by reference.
As shown in
In order to support automated object recognition functions (e.g. vegetable and fruit recognition) at the POS environment, image capturing and processing based object recognition subsystem 21 (i.e. including Object Libraries etc.) cooperates with the multi-channel image processing subsystem 20 so as to (i) manage and process the multiple channels of digital image frame data generated by the coplanar illumination and imaging stations 15, (ii) extract object features from processed digital images, and (iii) automatically recognize objects at the POS station which are represented in the Object Libraries of the object recognition subsystem 21.
The bar code symbol reading module employed along each channel of the digital image processing subsystem 20 can be realized using SwiftDecoder® Image Processing Based Bar Code Reading Software from Omniplanar Corporation, New Jersey, or any other suitable image processing based bar code reading software. Also, the system provides full support for (i) dynamically and adaptively controlling system control parameters in the digital image capture and processing system, as disclosed and taught in Applicants' U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,607,581 and 7,464,877 as well as (ii) permitting modification and/or extension of system features and functions, as disclosed and taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,708,205, each said patent being incorporated herein by reference.
In general, different types of EAS technology can be used to implement the EAS subsystem, including magnetic-based systems, also known as magneto-harmonic based systems; acousto-magnetic-based systems, also known as magneto-strictive based systems; radio-frequency based systems; and microwave-based systems. However, for purposes of illustration, the EAS subsystem 28 is based on magneto-harmonic technology.
In
As shown, RFID subsystem 700 comprises: RFID antennas (e.g. reading/writing coil) 702 for generating an RFID tag reading and writing field within a 3D RFID/EAS tag reading/writing/detection/deactivation volume (i.e. 3D RFID/EAS volume) 600 which, preferably, spatially encompasses, in whole or in part, the 3D imaging volume 450 shown in
During RFID tag reading operations, the signal transceiver 706 supports the transmission and reception of data communication signals between the RFID tag 970 (or RFID/EAS tag 972) and the RFID data processor 703, under the control of host computer 91, to read data from memory within the RFID tag, as required for the type of RFID technology employed in any given application. During RFID tag writing operations, the signal transceiver 706 supports the transmission and reception of data communication signals between the RFID tag 970 and the RFID data processor 703, under the control of host computer 91, to write data into memory within the RFID tag 970, as required for the type of RFID technology employed in any given application.
In general, different types of EAS technology can be used to implement the EAS subsystem, including magnetic, also known as magneto-harmonic; acousto-magnetic, also known as magnetostrictive; radio frequency; microwave; and video surveillance systems. However, for purposes of illustration, the EAS subsystem 28 is based on magneto-harmonic technology.
As shown, EAS subsystem 28 comprises: EAS antennas 28B (e.g. detection/deactivation coil) for generating an EAS tag detection and deactivation fields within the 3D RFID/EAS volume 600 spatially encompassing the 3D imaging volume 450, as shown in
During EAS tag detection operations, power generation circuit 28D supplies coil 28B with electrical current through discharge switch 28C, under the control of host computer 91, to generate an EAS tag detection field (within RFID/EAS volume 600) having a magnetic field intensity sufficient to illuminate an EAS tag within the field, so that EAS tag detection circuit 28E can sense changes in field intensity (due to the EAS tag) by processing electrical signals detected by coil 28D, and generates a signal indicative of the detected EAS tag presence in the field. During EAS tag deactivation operations, power generation circuit 28D supplies coil 28B with electrical current through discharge switch 28C, under the control of host computer 91, to generate an EAS tag deactivation field (within RFID/EAS volume 600) having a magnetic field intensity sufficient to deactivate an EAS tag within the field.
The primary function of the EAS subsystem 28 within the POS-based checkout system is two-fold: (1) automatically detect EAS tags on bar coded product, and/or RFID coded products, while the coded products are being passed through, about or around the 3D imaging volume at the POS-based checkout station, and send this EAS tag information to the global control subsystem 37; and (2) automatically deactivate an EAS tag on the coded product being passed through the 3D imaging volume after the bar and/or RFID coded product has been identified, purchased (i.e. paid for), and the two-factor authentication process has been fully satisfied. Function (1) above is carried out while a bar and/or RFID coded product is being passed through the 3D imaging zone. Function (2) is carried out simultaneously as the coded product is being purchased, and the global control subsystem 37 sends a control signal to discharge switch 28B, allowing electrical energy to flow from the power generation circuit 28C through the discharge switch, into the deactivation coil 28B, and generating an electromagnetic field having an intensity sufficient to deactivate the EAS tag on the purchased product present within the 3D imaging volume.
The primary function of control subsystem 37 is not only to orchestrate the various subsystems in the POS-based checkout system 1, but also to process data inputs and determine whether or not each product scanned at the POS-based checkout system 1 complies with the two-factor authentication process, and if this two-factor authentication process is not satisfied, then automatically generates the necessary security alerts and notifications for the sales clerk, cashier and/or management to make proper and necessary action to thwart potential theft in the retail store environment. Notably, such alerts could also include automated and controlled activation or focusing of security cameras in the store on the POS station, at which a failure of two-factor authentication compliance has been automatically detected by the POS-based system.
Referring to FIGS. 2G1 and 2G2, a preferred method of authenticated product checkout, supported by the POS-based checkout system of the first illustrative embodiment, will now be described in detail.
As indicated at Block A in FIG. 2G1, the first step of the method involves, for a given inventory of bar and/or RFID coded products in a retail store environment, determining which class or classes or consumer products are to be classified as “special” products, either having a high price point, and/or security demand in the retail environment, and therefore, should be tagged with EAS tags for security measures. For purposes of illustration only, special products shall be high-priced products or products having a price exceeding a particular price threshold in the retail environment. Thus, at Block A in FIG. 2G1, the price threshold of such products shall be deemed to be classified in the high-price range of the store, and not in the non-high-price range. While this price threshold arbitrary, it needs to be entered into the product price database 333 so that products priced at or above the price threshold shall be indexed as high-priced items, and shall be affixed an EAS tag within the retail stored environment in a conventional manner known in the EAS tagging art. Products priced below the price threshold shall not be affixed any EAS tag, and shall only bear their UPC or UPC/EAN bar code symbol labels and/or EPC-encoded RFID tags, in a conventional manner. Preferably, the database 333 will be realized as a relational database management system (RDBMS) connected to the same network on which the POS-based checkout system 1 is connected using conventional networking techniques.
As indicated at Block B in FIG. 2G1, based on the high-price threshold determined at Block A, the second step of the method involves determining which products in the store's inventory should be assigned and affixed EAS tags. This involves analyzing data in the RDBMS 333 and making this determination.
As indicated at Block C in FIG. 2G1, the third step of the method involves affixing EAS tags near the bar code labels (and/or RFID labels if employed) on all coded products in the store that have been classified in the high-price range in Block B, and not affixing EAS tags to any coded product that has not been classified in the high-price range. This involves analyzing data in the RDBMS 333 and making this determination.
As indicated at Block D in FIG. 2G1, the fourth step of the method involves configuring the POS-based checkout system 1 so that (i) its bar code symbol reader is arranged to read the bar code symbols on bar-coded products passed through the 3D imaging volume 450, and/or (ii) the RFID reader is arranged to read RFID tags (i.e. functioning as product identification and/or security codes) on products passed through the RFID/EAS volume 600, while (iii) the EAS tag detector (Le. product security code reader) is arranged to detect EAS tags (i.e. functioning as product security codes) affixed to high-priced products passed through the 3D RFID/EAS volume 600, Which spatially overlaps the 3D imaging volume 450 of the POS-based checkout system 1.
As indicated at Block E in FIG. 2G1, the fifth step of the method involves using the POS-Based checkout system 1 to read the bar code symbol (e.g. UPC, EAN or SKU) and/or the EPC-encoded REIT) tag or label on each product passed through the 3D imaging volume, while the EAS tag detector simultaneously detects the presence of an EAS tag on high-priced products being moved through or about the checkout station.
As indicated at Block F in FIG. 2G2, the sixth step of the method involves using the RDBMS 333 to identify the product passed through the POS-based checkout system 1.
As indicated at Block G in FIG. 2G2, the seventh step of the method involves the POS-based checkout system 1 determining whether or not the coded product is a high-priced product and assigned an EAS tag.
As indicated at Block H in FIG. 2G2, the eighth step of the method involves the POS-based checkout system 1 determining whether or not the detected EAS tag matches with the price-range of the product identified by the product identification code read by the bar code reader and/or REID reader (i.e. product identification reader).
As indicated at Block I1 in FIG. 2G2, the ninth step of the method involves determining if the detected EAS tag matches with the price-range of the product code read, and if so, then the POS-based checkout system automatically generates product code data and sends same to the host system. Optionally, the POS-based system can be programmed to generate a compliance signal for informing the cashier and/or management about authentication compliance at the POS station.
As indicated at Block I2 in FIG. 2G2, the tenth step of the method involves determining if the detected EAS tag does not match with the price-range of the product code read, then automatically determining that the two-factor authentication process has not been satisfied and generating a visible and/or audible alert or alarm to the cashier, clerk and/or his or her manager, to inform about a detected mis-match condition, indicating non-compliance of the two-factor authentication based checkout process. In addition, the checkout system can generate control signals which automatically activate digital cameras to capture, time-stamp and record video at the particular POS station in the retail environment.
In general, there are many different ways in which to display indications of two-factor authentication non-compliance and compliance.
In the event that the information display subsystem 300 supports the display of a bar or line graph type of visual display at the POS station, then there are a variety of different ways to visually display two-factor authentication compliance. For example, consider the case of visually displaying three different degrees of two-factor authentication compliance, namely: (i) when two-factor authentication compliance fails, an LED of a particular color (e.g. RED) is driven to illuminated RED light, or an LED at a particular location driven to illuminate a particular color of light; (ii) when two-factor authentication compliance is satisfied, an LED of a particular color (e.g. GREEN) is driven to illuminated GREEN light, or an LED at a particular location driven to illuminate a particular color of light; and (iii) when two-factor authentication compliance is not clear (questionable for whatever reason), an LED of a particular color (e.g. YELLOW) is driven to illuminated YELLOW light, or an LED at a particular location driven to illuminate a particular color of light. This visual-type information display subsystem 300 can be realized using a single LED capable of generating three different colors of visible illumination, or by three discrete LEDs 301 located at different relative display positions, and possibly capable different colors of light. In this illustrative embodiment, a range of two-factor authentication compliance will be assigned to a corresponding LED color or LED position, supported by the three-state visual display indication the system, described above.
As an alternative, or in addition to color information, the information display subsystem can also employ different types of visual information such as, but not limited to, textures on a LCD display 302, and well as audio information to indicate two-factor authentication compliance.
In the event that information display subsystem 300 supports an audible/acoustical display at the POS station, then there are a variety of ways to acoustically display two-factor authentication compliance. For example, consider the case if audibly/acoustically displaying three different degrees of two-factor authentication compliance, namely: (i) when two-factor authentication compliance fails, the transducer is driven to produce a first discernible sound having a first pitch P1; (ii) when two-factor authentication compliance is satisfied, the transducer is driven to produce a second discernible sound having a second pitch P2; and (iii) when two-factor authentication compliance is questionable, an acoustical transducer is driven to produce a third discernible sound having a third pitch P3. This acoustical-type information display subsystem 300 can be realized using a single piezo-acoustic transducer 303 capable of generating three different sounds of different pitch, or by three discrete piezo-electric transducers 303 each designed to generate sounds of different pitch. In this illustrative embodiment, a range of two-factor authentication compliance (or non-compliance) will be assigned to a corresponding pitch, supported by the three-state acoustical display indication system, described above.
In yet other embodiments of the information display subsystem 300, both visual and acoustical display capabilities can be combined into a single information display subsystem having one or more modes of operation, in which either visual, or acoustical display capabilities are carried out, or both visual and acoustical display capabilities are carried out simultaneously, as desired or required by the particular application at hand.
In
As shown in
As shown in
In this illustrative embodiment, a pair of IR object detection fields 120A and 120B are projected outside of the limits of the horizontal and vertical scanning windows of the system housing, and spatially co-incident therewith, for sensing in real-time the motion of objects passing therethrough during system operation.
As shown in
In
As shown, RFID subsystem 700 comprises: RFID antennas (e.g. reading/writing coil) 702 for generating an RFID tag reading and writing field within a 3D RFID/EAS tag detection/writing/detection/deactivation zone (i.e. 3D RFID/EAS volume 600″) that spatially encompasses the 3D imaging volume 450 shown in
During RFID tag reading operations, the signal transceiver 706 supports the transmission and reception of data communication signals between the RFID tag and the RFID data processor 703, under the control of host computer 91, to read data from memory within the RFID tag, as required for the type of RFID technology employed in any given application. During RFID tag writing operations, the signal transceiver 706 supports the transmission and reception of data communication signals between the RFID tag and the RFID data processor 703, under the control of host computer 91, to write data into memory within the RFID tag, as required for the type of RFID technology employed in any given application.
In general, different types of EAS technology can be used to implement the EAS subsystem, as including magnetic, also known as magneto-harmonic; acousto-magnetic, also known as magnetostrictive; radio frequency; microwave; and video surveillance systems. However, for purposes of illustration, the EAS subsystem 428 is based on magneto-harmonic technology.
As shown, EAS subsystem 428 comprises: EAS antennas (e.g. detection/deactivation coil) 428B for generating an EAS tag detection and deactivation fields within a 3D RFID/EAS volume 600 that spatially encompasses the 3D scanning volume 460, as shown in
During EAS tag detection operations, power generation circuit 428D supplies coil 28B with electrical current through discharge switch 428C, under the control of host computer 91, to generate an EAS tag detection field (within the RFID/EAS zone 600) having a magnetic field intensity sufficient to illuminate an EAS tag within the field. The EAS tag detection/reading circuit 428E senses changes in field intensity (due to the EAS tag) by processing electrical signals detected by coil 428D, and generates a signal indicative of the detected EAS tag presence in the field. During EAS tag deactivation operations, power generation circuit 428D supplies coil 428B with electrical current through discharge switch 428C, under the control of host computer 91, to generate an EAS tag deactivation field (also within RFID/EAS volume 600) having a magnetic field intensity sufficient to deactivate an EAS tag within the field.
The primary function of the EAS subsystem 428 within the POS-based checkout system is two-fold: (1) to automatically read EAS tags on bar and/or RFID coded products while being passed through, about or around the 3D scanning volume 460, and send this EAS tag information to the global control subsystem 437; and (2) to automatically deactivate an EAS tag on the coded product being passed through the 3D imaging volume after (ii) the bar and/or RFID coded product has been identified, purchased (i.e. paid for), and the two-factor authentication process has been fully satisfied. Function (1) above is carried out while a bar and/or RFID coded product is being passed through the 3D scanning volume 460. Preferably, function (2) is carried out simultaneously as the coded product is being purchased, and the global control subsystem 437 sends a control signal to discharge switch 428B, allowing electrical energy to flow from the power generation circuit 428C through the discharge switch, into the deactivation coil 428B, generating an electromagnetic field having an intensity sufficient to deactivate the EAS tag on the purchased product present within the 3D imaging volume.
The primary function of control subsystem 437 is not only to orchestrate the various subsystems in the POS-based checkout system 1′, but also to process data inputs and determine whether or not each bar-coded product scanned at the POS-based checkout system 1′ satisfies or complies with the two-factor authentication process specified by the logic set forth in
In general, the IR-based object motion detection fields 120A and 120B can be generated in various ways, including from a plurality of IR Pulse-Doppler LIDAR motion/velocity detection subsystems 300 installed within the system housing. In the illustrative embodiments of
While the two-factor authentication operation of the POS-based checkout system 1′ is described in FIGS. 1A1 through 1A8, it will be helpful to briefly describe the general operation of this the POS-based checkout system in terms of its particular equipment.
Referring to FIGS. 3E1 and 3E2, a preferred method of authentication-based product checkout, supported by the POS-based checkout system of the second illustrative embodiment, will now be described in detail.
As indicated at Block A in FIG. 3E1, the first step of the method involves, for a given inventory of identity coded products in a retail store environment, determining which class or classes or consumer products are to be classified as “special” products, either having a high price point, and/or security demand in the retail environment, and therefore, should be tagged with EAS tags for security measures. For purposes of illustration only, special products shall be high-priced products or products having a price exceeding a particular price threshold in the retail environment. Thus, at Block A in FIG. 3E1, the price threshold of such products shall be deemed to be classified in the high-price range of the store, and not in the non-high-price range. While this price threshold arbitrary, it needs to be entered into the product price database 333 so that identity-coded products (i.e. products bearing UPC, EAN or SKU bar codes and/or EPC-encoded RFID tags) which are priced at or above the price threshold shall be indexed as high-priced items, and shall be affixed an EAS tag within the retail stored environment in a conventional manner known in the EAS tagging art. Similarly, coded products priced below the price threshold shall not be affixed any EAS tag, and shall only bear their UPC or UPC/EAN bar code symbol labels or RFID code tags, in a conventional manner. Preferably, the database 333 will be realized as a relational database management system (RDBMS) connected to the same network on which the POS-based checkout system 1′ is connected using conventional networking techniques.
As indicated at Block B in FIG. 3E1, based on the high-price threshold determined at Block A, the second step of the method involves determining which products in the store's inventory should be assigned and affixed EAS tags. This involves analyzing data in the RDBMS 333 and making this determination.
As indicated at Block C in FIG. 3E1, the third step of the method involves affixing EAS tags to all bar and/or RFID coded products in the store that have been classified in the high-price range in Block B, and not affixing EAS tags to any coded product that have not been classified in the high-price range. This involves analyzing data in the RDBMS 333 and making this determination.
As indicated at Block D in FIG. 3E1, the fourth step of the method involves configuring the POS-based checkout system 1′ so that (i) the bar code symbol reader is arranged to read the bar code symbols of each coded product passed through the 3D scanning volume, and/or the RFID reader 700 is arranged to read an EPC-encoded RFID tag on each coded product passed through the RFID/EAS volume 600, while (ii) the EAS tag detector is arranged to detect an EAS tag affixed to a high-priced coded product passed through the 3D RFID/EAS volume 600, spatially overlapping the 3D scanning volume of the POS-based checkout system.
As indicated at Block E in FIG. 3E1, the fifth step of the method involves using the POS-based checkout system 1′ to read the product code on each product passed through checkout system, while the EAS tag detector simultaneously detects EAS tags on products through or about the checkout system.
As indicated at Block F in FIG. 3E2, the sixth step of the method involves using the RDBMS 333 to identify the product passed through the POS-based checkout system.
As indicated at Block G in FIG. 3E2, the seventh step of the method involves the POS-based checkout system 1′ determining whether or not the coded product in the 3D RFID/EAS volume has been EAS-tagged as a high-priced product.
As indicated at Block H in FIG. 3E2, the ninth step of the method involves the POS-based checkout system 1′ determining whether or not the detected EAS tag matches with the price-range of the product identified by the product code read by the bar code symbol reader, and/or the RFID code reader.
As indicated at Block I1 in FIG. 3E2, the ninth step of the method involves determining if the detected EAS tag matches with the product code read, indicating two-factor authentication process compliance, and if so, then the POS-based checkout system 1′ automatically generates product code identification data and sends same to the host system.
As indicated at Block I2 in FIG. 3E2, the tenth step of the method involves determining if the detected EAS tag does not match the product code read, then automatically determines that the two-factor authentication process has not been satisfied and generates a visible and/or audible alert or alarm to the cashier and/or his or her manager, to inform about a detected mis-match condition. In addition, the checkout system can generate control signals which automatically activate digital cameras to capture, time-stamp and record video at the particular POS station in the retail environment.
In all respects, the information display subsystem 300 operates in system 10B as described in connection with the POS checkout system 1′.
Referring now to FIGS. 4 through 6A2, a third illustrative embodiment of a hand-supportable POS-based checkout system 1″ will be described in detail.
As shown in
The hand-supportable POS-based checkout system 1″ can be used in both hand-supportable and counter-top supportable modes of operation, in manually-triggered and automatically-triggered modes of operation, and for (i) reading optically-encoded symbols (e.g. bar code symbols) and electronically-encoded devices (e.g. RFID tags), and (ii) detecting and activating EAS tags that have been applied to objects such as high-valued consumer products.
As shown in FIG. 6A1, the POS-based system 1″ comprises a number of subsystem components, namely: an image formation and detection (i.e. camera) subsystem 521 having image formation (camera) optics 534 for producing a field of view (FOV) upon an object to be imaged and a CMOS or like area-type image detection array 35 for detecting imaged light reflected off the object during illumination operations in an image capture mode in which at least a plurality of rows of pixels on the image detection array are enabled; a LED-based illumination subsystem 522 employing an LED illumination array 532 for producing a field of narrow-band wide-area illumination 526 within the entire FOV 533 of the image formation and detection subsystem 521, which is reflected from the illuminated object and transmitted through a narrow-band transmission-type optical filter 540 realized within the hand-supportable and detected by the image detection array 35, while all other components of ambient light are substantially rejected; an object targeting illumination subsystem 531 for generating a narrow-area targeting illumination beam 570 into the FOV to help allow the user align bar code symbols within the active portion of the FOV where imaging occurs; an IR-based object motion detection and analysis subsystem 520 for producing an IR-based object detection field 532 within the FOV of the image formation and detection subsystem 521; an automatic light exposure measurement and illumination control subsystem 524 for controlling the operation of the LED-based illumination subsystem 522; an image capturing and buffering subsystem 525 for capturing and buffering 2-D images detected by the image formation and detection subsystem 521: a digital image processing subsystem 526 for processing 2D digital images captured and buffered by the image capturing and buffering subsystem 525 and reading 1D and/or 2D bar code symbols represented therein; an input/output subsystem 527 for outputting processed image data and the like to an external host system or other information receiving or responding device; an electronic article surveillance (EAS) subsystem 528 for generating EAS tag detection and deactivation fields under the supervision of host system 91; an RFID subsystem 700 for generating RFID tag reading and writing fields under the supervision of host system 91; a system memory 529 for storing data implementing a configuration table 529A of system configuration parameters (SCPs); a system control subsystem 530 integrated with the subsystems above, for controlling and/or coordinating these subsystems during system operation; a retail RDBMS server 333 interfaced with the input/output subsystem 527, for supporting POS product pricing and related POS services described hereinafter; and a Bluetooth communication interface, interfaced with I/O subsystem 527, and hand-held scanners, PDAs and the like.
As shown in FIGS. 5C and 6A2, the POS-based checkout system 1″ also comprises: an EAS-enabling faceplate bezel 900, disclosed in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/017,256 filed Jan. 13, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference, embodying the primary subcomponents of the EAS subsystem 528, and RFID subsystem 700 (e.g. EAS antennas 528B, RFID antennas 702 and interface circuit 970 allowing a flexible EAS/RFID cable 902 to pass the interfaces of the EAS module 528A and RFID module 701, as shown in
The primary function of the object targeting subsystem 531 is to automatically generate and project a visible linear-targeting illumination beam across the central extent of the FOV of the system in response to either (i) the automatic detection of an object during hand-held imaging modes of system operation, or (ii) manual detection of an object by an operator when s/he manually actuates the manually-actuatable trigger switch 505 (505A, 505B). In order to implement the object targeting subsystem 531, the OCS assembly 578 also comprises a fourth support structure for supporting the pair of beam folding mirrors above a pair of aperture slots, which in turn are disposed above a pair of visible LEDs arranged on opposite sides of the FOV optics 534 so as to generate a linear visible targeting beam 570 that is projected off the second FOV folding 575 and out the imaging window 503, as shown and described in detail in US Publication No. US20080314985 A1, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The primary function of the object motion detection and analysis subsystem 520 is to automatically produce an object detection field 532 within the FOV 533 of the image formation and detection subsystem 521, to detect the presence of an object within predetermined regions of the object detection field 532, as well as motion and velocity information about objects therewithin, and to generate control signals which are supplied to the system control subsystem 530 for indicating when and where an object is detected within the object detection field of the system. As shown in
The image formation and detection subsystem 521 includes image formation (camera) optics 534 for providing a field of view (FOV) 533 upon an object to be imaged and a CMOS area-type image detection array 535 for detecting imaged light reflected off the object during illumination and image acquisition/capture operations.
The primary function of the LED-based illumination subsystem 522 is to produce a wide-area illumination field 36 from the LED array 523 when an object is automatically detected within the FOV. Notably, the field of illumination has a narrow optical-bandwidth and is spatially confined within the FOV of the image formation and detection subsystem 521 during modes of illumination and imaging, respectively. This arrangement is designed to ensure that only narrow-band illumination transmitted from the illumination subsystem 522, and reflected from the illuminated object, is ultimately transmitted through a narrow-band transmission-type optical filter subsystem 540 within the system and reaches the CMOS area-type image detection array 535 for detection and processing, whereas all other components of ambient light collected by the light collection optics are substantially rejected at the image detection array 535, thereby providing improved SNR, thus improving the performance of the system.
The narrow-band transmission-type optical filter subsystem 540 is realized by (1) a high-pass (i.e. red-wavelength reflecting) filter element embodied within at the imaging window 3, and (2) a low-pass filter element mounted either before the CMOS area-type image detection array 535 or anywhere after beyond the high-pass filter element, including being realized as a dichroic mirror film supported on at least one of the FOV folding mirrors 574 and 575, shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The automatic light exposure measurement and illumination control subsystem 524 performs two primary functions: (1) to measure, in real-time, the power density [joules/cm] of photonic energy (i.e. light) collected by the optics of the system at about its image detection array 535, and to generate auto-exposure control signals indicating the amount of exposure required for good image formation and detection; and (2) in combination with the illumination array selection control signal provided by the system control subsystem 530, to automatically drive and control the output power of the LED array 523 in the illumination subsystem 522, so that objects within the FOV of the system are optimally exposed to LED-based illumination and optimal images are formed and detected at the image detection array 535.
As shown in
The primary function of the image capturing and buffering subsystem 525 is (1) to detect the entire 2-D image focused onto the 2D image detection array 535 by the image formation optics 534 of the system, (2) to generate a frame of digital pixel data for either a selected region of interest of the captured image frame, or for the entire detected image, and then (3) buffer each frame of image data as it is captured.
Notably, in the illustrative embodiment, the system has both single-shot and video modes of imaging. In the single shot mode, a single 2D image frame (31) is captured during each image capture and processing cycle, or during a particular stage of a processing cycle. In the video mode of imaging, the system continuously captures frames of digital images of objects in the FOV. These modes are specified in further detail in US Patent Application Publication No. US20080314985 A1, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The primary function of the digital image processing subsystem 526 is to process digital images that have been captured and buffered by the image capturing and buffering subsystem 525, during modes of illumination and operation. Such image processing operations include image-based bar code decoding methods as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,266, incorporated herein by reference.
In
As shown in
As shown in
During EAS tag detection operations, power generation circuit 528D supplies coil 28B with electrical current through discharge switch 528C, under the control of host computer 91, to generate an EAS tag detection field having a magnetic field intensity sufficient to illuminate an EAS tag within the field, so that EAS tag detection/reading circuit 528E can sense changes in field intensity (due to the EAS tag) by processing electrical signals detected by coil 528D, and generates a signal indicative of the detected EAS tag presence in the field. During EAS tag deactivation operations, power generation circuit 528D supplies coil 28B with electrical current through discharge switch 528C, under the control of host computer 91, to generate an EAS tag deactivation field having a magnetic field intensity sufficient to deactivate an EAS tag within the field.
During RFID tag reading operations, the signal transceiver 706 supports the transmission and reception of data communication signals between the RFID tag and the RFID data processor 703, under the control of host computer 91, to read data from memory within the RFID tag, as required for the type of RFID technology employed in any given application. During RFID tag writing operations, the signal transceiver 706 supports the transmission and reception of data communication signals between the RFID tag and the RFID data processor 703, under the control of host computer 91, to write data into memory within the RFID tag, as required for the type of RFID technology employed in any given application.
The primary function of the input/output subsystem 527 is to support universal, standard and/or proprietary data communication interfaces with host system 91 and other external devices, and output processed image data and the like to host system 91 and/or devices, by way of such communication interfaces. Examples of such interfaces, and technology for implementing the same, are given in U.S. Pat. No. 6,619,549, incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The primary function of the system control subsystem 530 is to provide some predetermined degree of control, coordination and/or management signaling services to each subsystem component integrated within the system, as shown. While this subsystem can be implemented by a programmed microprocessor, in the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, this subsystem is implemented by the three-tier software architecture supported on micro-computing platform, described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,266, incorporated herein by reference.
The primary function of the manually-actuatable trigger switch 505A integrated with the housing is to enable the user, during a manually-triggered modes, to generate a control activation signal (i.e. trigger event signal) upon manually depressing the same (i.e. causing a trigger event), and to provide this control activation signal to the system control subsystem 530 for use in carrying out its complex system and subsystem control operations, described in detail herein.
The primary function of the system configuration parameter (SCP) table 529A in system memory is to store (in non-volatile/persistent memory) a set of system configuration and control parameters (i.e. SCPs) for each of the available features and functionalities, and programmable modes of supported system operation, and which can be automatically read and used by the system control subsystem 530 as required during its complex operations. Notably, such SCPs can be dynamically managed as taught in great detail in co-pending US Publication No. US20080314985 A1, incorporated herein by reference.
As shown in
While the two-factor authentication operation of the POS-based checkout system 1″ is described in FIGS. 1A1 through 1A8, it will be helpful to briefly describe the general operation of the POS-based checkout system in terms of its particular equipment.
Referring to
As indicated at Block A in
As indicated at Block B in
As indicated at Block C in
As indicated at Block D in
As indicated at Block E in
As indicated at Block F in
As indicated at Block G in
As indicated at Block H in
As indicated at Block I1 in
As indicated at Block I2 in
While the two-factor authentication operation of the POS-based checkout system 900 is described in FIGS. 1A1 through 1A8, the general operation of mobile POS-based checkout system 900 is similar in many ways to the digital-imaging based POS checkout system 1″ shown in
In this alterative embodiment, the EAS module 528, RFID module 700 and rechargeable battery pack 905 and a wireless RF data communication module (e.g. Bluetooth communication interface) with antennas, are integrated into the compact base module 504A, detachably mounted beneath base portion 504, without adding significantly to the size or weight of the mobile hand-supportable system
As shown in
So equipped, mobile POS-based system 900 has the advantage of supporting the reading of 1D, 2D and datamatrix codes, as well as RFID codes, and also detecting and deactivating EAS tags and labels, virtually anywhere in diverse application environments, and carryout the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure, illustrated in
Modifications That Come To Mind
While the illustrative embodiments described above involves the use of bi-optic POS imagers, bi-optic laser scanners, hand-supportable and mobile digital imagers, it is understood that the systems and methods of the present disclosure can be implemented using code reading systems having other form factors, including hand-held lasers and imagers, mobility products, code symbol reading engines, hands-free devices, and the like.
In the illustrative embodiments described above, (i) bar codes and/or RFID codes were used to realize the first factor, or the product identification code, employed in the authentication process, while (ii) EAS tags or labels were used as the second factor, or the security classification code, employed in the two-factor POS checkout authentication process. However, it is understood that alternative combinations of such factors can be used to practice the two-factor authentication method.
For example, alternatively, the first factor (i.e. product identification code) could be realized as a unique bar code symbol on each product, while the second factor (i.e. security classification code) could be realized as an RFID tag or label (with appropriate coding) applied to high-priced products in the authentication process. In this alternative embodiment, data can be automatically written to the memory of the RFID tag or label on each high-priced product, and when the bar code symbol on the product also has an encoded RFID tag or label, consistent with data stored in the RDBMS, the system automatically “deactivates” the RFID tag or label from setting off an alarm or alert at a security point (e.g. exit) in the retail environment, by writing data to the memory of the RFID tag to effectively disable it from generating alarms or alerts in retail store environment. In this case, the specially-encoded RFID tag or label functions or emulates an EAS security tag, while also providing item-level intelligence to retailers operating the POS-based checkout system.
Another alternative embodiment of the two-factor authentication process, the first factor (i.e. product identification code) can be an EPC-encoded RFID tag or label (i.e. electronic code), providing product level identification to the POS-based checkout system, while the second factor (i.e. security classification code) is realized as an EAS tag or label assigned to each high priced or high-security-risk class of products sold within a retail environment. In this alternative embodiment, optically read types of bar code symbols or dataforms are not used to identify consumer products; and instead, only EPC-encoded RFID tags or labels are used as the first factor, in the two-factor authentication process of the present disclosure.
Several modifications to the illustrative embodiments have been described above. It is understood, however, that various other modifications to the illustrative embodiment will readily occur to persons with ordinary skill in the art. All such modifications and variations are deemed to be within the scope of the accompanying Claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/741,779 for a Point Of Sale (POS) Based Checkout System Supporting a Customer-Transparent Two-Factor Authentication Process During Product Checkout Operations, filed Apr. 24, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61741779 | Apr 2012 | US |